What is the diatomic molecule with the largest dipole moment?

Ahmed Elhalawani; Jes\'us P\'erez R\'ios; Mateo Londo\~no Castellanos; Michal Tomza; Ruiren Shi

arxiv: 2507.10462 · v1 · submitted 2025-07-14 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph · cond-mat.quant-gas· physics.chem-ph

What is the diatomic molecule with the largest dipole moment?

Ahmed Elhalawani , Ruiren Shi , Mateo Londo\~no Castellanos , Michal Tomza , Jes\'us P\'erez R\'ios This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 04:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph cond-mat.quant-gasphysics.chem-ph

keywords machine learningdiatomic moleculeselectric dipole momentperiodic tablecold moleculesatomic propertiesanalytical expressionpolar molecules

0 comments

The pith

A machine learning model using only atomic properties can identify the diatomic molecule with the largest electric dipole moment.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors create a machine learning model that takes only the properties of two atoms and predicts the electric dipole moment of the diatomic molecule they form. This allows the model to evaluate every possible pair of atoms from the periodic table and pinpoint which combination produces the biggest dipole. Such molecules are valuable for experiments in cold molecular physics where strong dipoles enable better control and interactions. The model also uncovers patterns in how atomic features contribute to polarity, sharpening chemical intuition. They further simplify the model into a closed-form analytical expression for rapid estimates without needing machine learning computations.

Core claim

The paper shows that a machine learning model trained on atomic properties of known diatomic molecules can accurately predict the dipole moments for all possible atom pairs, enabling a full scan of the periodic table to find the molecule with the largest dipole moment and to extract useful trends in molecular polarity.

What carries the argument

A machine learning model trained on atomic properties of known diatomic molecules that predicts dipole moments for arbitrary atom pairs and is condensed into an analytical expression.

If this is right

Researchers can use the model to select the best molecules for cold trapping and quantum control experiments without first synthesizing candidates.
The extracted trends clarify how differences in atomic properties drive large molecular dipoles, refining intuition for molecular design.
The model can be queried to find the largest-dipole molecule that includes any chosen atom from the periodic table.
The distilled analytical expression gives a fast, equation-based route to estimate dipole moments for new atom pairs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same atomic-property approach could be adapted to screen for other molecular properties such as bond strengths or hyperfine constants.
Laboratory tests on the top-ranked molecule would provide a direct check and might yield a new reference system for precision measurements.
Adding constraints like specific isotopes or external electric fields to the screening could uncover even better candidates for applications.

Load-bearing premise

That a model trained on atomic properties of known diatomic molecules will accurately generalize to predict dipole moments for all possible atom pairs across the periodic table, including those far from the training distribution.

What would settle it

Experimental measurement of the dipole moment of the specific diatomic molecule the model identifies as having the largest value, where a large discrepancy would invalidate the screening result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.10462 by Ahmed Elhalawani, Jes\'us P\'erez R\'ios, Mateo Londo\~no Castellanos, Michal Tomza, Ruiren Shi.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Prediction of the dipole moment of diatomics. Pre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Testing the machine learning model predictions on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Figure A displays the PySR analytical model predic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We present a machine learning model for predicting the electric dipole moment of diatomic molecules using only the atomic properties of the constituent atoms. Our model can screen the entire periodic table and identify the molecules with the largest dipole moment for applications in cold molecular sciences, or find the molecule with the largest dipole moment that contains a given atom. Similarly, our model identifies useful trends that explain the dipole moment of molecules, improving our intuition in chemical physics. Finally, we condense our model into an analytical expression to predict the dipole moment in terms of atomic properties.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper trains an ML model on atomic properties to predict diatomic dipole moments, screens the periodic table for the largest ones, and reduces the model to an analytical expression, but the extrapolation to unseen or heavy-atom pairs remains the untested weak point.

read the letter

The main takeaway is a practical ML model that takes basic atomic properties as inputs and outputs predicted dipole moments for diatomic molecules. They apply it to scan the full periodic table for extreme values and then compress the model into a closed-form expression that can be used without running the full predictor each time. That combination gives experimentalists in cold molecules a quick way to generate candidate lists and some trend-based intuition about what drives large dipoles. The screening step and the analytical reduction are the parts that feel like genuine forward movement beyond just another property-prediction paper. Both are straightforward to implement and could be picked up by groups that need fast estimates before committing to expensive calculations or measurements. The soft spot is generalization. The training data come from known stable diatomics, yet the headline claim is that the model reliably ranks every possible atom pair, including hypothetical or high-Z combinations where relativistic corrections, core effects, and non-additive bonding matter. Simple atomic features do not automatically encode those regime-specific corrections, and the analytical expression inherits the same limitation. Without reported performance numbers on held-out pairs, on unstable molecules, or on heavy-element cases, it is difficult to judge how much the rankings can be trusted. The paper is aimed at researchers who need rapid screening tools or improved chemical intuition in molecular physics and ultracold chemistry. A reader who wants a ready formula or a starting point for target selection will find value, even if they later run higher-level checks. It deserves a serious referee because the core idea is clear, the intended use case is concrete, and the validation gaps are fixable rather than fatal. Referees can push for explicit error analysis and tests on diverse atom pairs, after which the work would be more solid for the community.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a machine learning model that predicts the electric dipole moment of diatomic molecules using only atomic properties of the constituent atoms as inputs. The model is used to screen the periodic table for molecules with the largest dipole moments (relevant to cold molecular sciences), to identify explanatory trends, and is finally condensed into an analytical expression for direct prediction in terms of atomic properties.

Significance. If the generalization and accuracy claims hold, the work would provide a practical, low-cost screening tool for identifying high-dipole diatomics across the periodic table and a compact analytical formula that improves chemical intuition. The reduction of the ML model to an explicit analytical expression is a notable strength that enhances interpretability and usability.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and model description] The central claim that the model can reliably screen the entire periodic table (including unseen, unstable, or high-Z atom pairs) rests on untested extrapolation. No validation metrics, training-set description, cross-validation results, or error analysis on held-out or extrapolated pairs are supplied, so it is impossible to evaluate whether atomic-property features alone suffice outside the training distribution.
[Results on periodic-table screening] The skeptic concern about generalization is load-bearing: atomic properties do not automatically incorporate relativistic corrections, core-valence effects, or non-additive bonding that become important for heavy-element pairs. Without explicit tests on such regimes, the ranking of the absolute largest dipole moment cannot be considered robust.

minor comments (1)

[Methods] Clarify the exact atomic properties used as features and the ML architecture (e.g., regression method, hyperparameters) so that the condensation to an analytical expression can be reproduced.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which have helped us improve the manuscript. We address each point below and have incorporated revisions to provide more details on validation and limitations of extrapolation.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and model description] The central claim that the model can reliably screen the entire periodic table (including unseen, unstable, or high-Z atom pairs) rests on untested extrapolation. No validation metrics, training-set description, cross-validation results, or error analysis on held-out or extrapolated pairs are supplied, so it is impossible to evaluate whether atomic-property features alone suffice outside the training distribution.

Authors: We agree with the referee that additional details on validation are necessary. In the revised manuscript, we have expanded the methods section to describe the training set (compiled from literature sources of experimental dipole moments), included cross-validation results, and provided error analysis. We have also added a subsection discussing the performance on extrapolated pairs where possible and have moderated the language regarding the reliability of screening the entire periodic table to reflect the limitations of extrapolation. revision: yes
Referee: [Results on periodic-table screening] The skeptic concern about generalization is load-bearing: atomic properties do not automatically incorporate relativistic corrections, core-valence effects, or non-additive bonding that become important for heavy-element pairs. Without explicit tests on such regimes, the ranking of the absolute largest dipole moment cannot be considered robust.

Authors: We concur that atomic properties alone may miss important effects such as relativistic corrections for heavy elements. The revised version includes an explicit discussion of these potential shortcomings and their possible impact on the predicted rankings for high-Z molecules. We have included comparisons to known values for heavier diatomics where available and advise caution in interpreting the absolute largest values without further verification. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: model trained on external atomic properties; generalization and analytical condensation are independent steps

full rationale

The paper trains an ML model on atomic properties of known diatomics to predict dipole moments, then uses the trained model to screen the periodic table and condenses it to an analytical expression. No step reduces by construction to its own inputs: the training data are external molecular measurements, the screening claim is an empirical generalization (not a definitional identity), and the analytical form is a post-training simplification rather than a tautology. No self-citation is load-bearing for the core result, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the model is described as relying on atomic properties but no further breakdown is available.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5638 in / 1068 out tokens · 44498 ms · 2026-05-19T04:52:47.449641+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

d = |ΔIP^{1/4} + ((EAA + EAB) · (√IC_HS · (24.43/(IPA IPB) − 0.14)))| (Eq. 5, symbolic regression result)
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Gaussian Process Regression on ionic character, ionization potentials, electron affinities, group/period features; screening 4851 molecules

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

K.-K. Ni, T. Rosenband, and D. D. Grimes, Chem. Sci. 9, 6830 (2018), URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/ C8SC02355G

work page 2018
[2]

J. Zhu, S. Kais, Q. Wei, D. Herschbach, and B. Friedrich, The Journal of Chemical Physics 138, 024104 (2013), ISSN 0021-9606, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.4774058/14791601/024104 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4774058

work page doi:10.1063/1.4774058/14791601/024104 2013
[3]

DeMille, Phys

D. DeMille, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 067901 (2002), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88. 067901

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88 2002
[4]

J. L. Bohn, A. M. Rey, and J. Ye, Science 357, 1002 (2017), URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/ CorpusID:206656605

work page 2017
[5]

Sch¨ afer, T

F. Sch¨ afer, T. Fukuhara, S. Sugawa, Y. Takasu, and Y. Takahashi, Nature Reviews Physics 2, 411 (2020), URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-020-0195-3

work page doi:10.1038/s42254-020-0195-3 2020
[6]

P´ erez-R´ ıos,An Introduction to Cold and Ultracold Chemistry (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 2020), ISBN 3030559351

J. P´ erez-R´ ıos,An Introduction to Cold and Ultracold Chemistry (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 2020), ISBN 3030559351

work page 2020
[7]

Kruckenhauser, L

A. Kruckenhauser, L. M. Sieberer, L. De Marco, J.-R. Li, K. Matsuda, W. G. Tobias, G. Valtolina, J. Ye, A. M. Rey, M. A. Baranov, et al., Phys. Rev. A 102, 023320 (2020), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevA.102.023320

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.102.023320 2020
[8]

Micheli, G

A. Micheli, G. K. Brennen, and P. Zoller, Nature Physics 2, 341 (2006), URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ nphys287

work page 2006
[9]

P´ erez-R´ ıos, F

J. P´ erez-R´ ıos, F. Herrera, and R. V. Krems, New Journal of Physics 12, 103007 (2010), URL https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1367-2630/12/10/103007

work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/10/103007 2010
[10]

L. D. Carr, D. DeMille, R. V. Krems, and J. Ye, New Journal of Physics 11, 055049 (2009), URL https:// doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/11/5/055049

work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/11/5/055049 2009
[12]

J. A. Blackmore, L. Caldwell, P. D. Gregory, E. M. Bridge, R. Sawant, J. Aldegunde, J. Mur-Petit, D. Jaksch, J. M. Hutson, B. E. Sauer, et al., Quan- tum Science and Technology 4, 014010 (2018), URL https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/aaee35

work page doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aaee35 2018
[13]

Smucker and J

J. Smucker and J. P´ erez-R´ ıos, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 26, 21513 (2024), URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/ D4CP01956C

work page 2024
[14]

K los, H

J. K los, H. Li, E. Tiesinga, and S. Kotochigova, New Journal of Physics 24, 025005 (2022), URL https://dx. doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ac50ea

work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ac50ea 2022
[15]

A. Marc, M. Hubert, and T. Fleig, Phys. Rev. A 108, 062815 (2023), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevA.108.062815

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.108.062815 2023
[16]

R. F. Garcia Ruiz, R. Berger, J. Billowes, C. L. Bin- nersley, M. L. Bissell, A. A. Breier, A. J. Brinson, K. Chrysalidis, T. E. Cocolios, B. S. Cooper, et al., Na- ture 581, 396 (2020), URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-020-2299-4

work page 2020
[17]

S. M. Udrescu, A. J. Brinson, R. F. G. Ruiz, K. Gaul, R. Berger, J. Billowes, C. L. Binnersley, M. L. Bissell, A. A. Breier, K. Chrysalidis, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 033001 (2021), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.033001

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.033001 2021
[18]

Pauling, Journal of the American Chemical Soci- ety 53, 1367 (1931), URL https://doi.org/10.1021/ ja01355a027

L. Pauling, Journal of the American Chemical Soci- ety 53, 1367 (1931), URL https://doi.org/10.1021/ ja01355a027

work page 1931
[19]

L. Pauling, The nature of the chemical bond and the structure of molecules and crystals : an introduction to modern structural chemistry (3rd ed.) (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y., 1986)

work page 1986
[20]

N. B. Hannay and C. P. Smyth, Journal of the American Chemical Society 68, 171 (1946), https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01206a003, URL https:// doi.org/10.1021/ja01206a003

work page doi:10.1021/ja01206a003 1946
[21]

M. Klessinger, Angewandte Chemie Inter- national Edition in English 9, 500 (1970), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/anie.197005001, URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10. 1002/anie.197005001

work page doi:10.1002/anie.197005001 1970
[22]

´Smia lkowski and M

M. ´Smia lkowski and M. Tomza, Phys. Rev. A 103, 022802 (2021), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevA.103.022802

work page 2021
[23]

Note1, the main difference is in HF since Pauling as- sumed a 63 % of partial ionic character whereas Hanny and Smyth assumed a 41 %

work page
[24]

C. A. Coulson, Valence (Clarendon Press, Oxford, Ox- ford, United Kingdom, 1952)

work page 1952
[25]

L.-R. Liu, M. Aguirre, S. R. Kane, B. K. Kendrick, and B. Hemmerling, Phys. Rev. A 111, 062810 (2025), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/hwwm-1mn7

work page doi:10.1103/hwwm-1mn7 2025
[26]

Zhang, T

R. Zhang, T. C. Steimle, L. Cheng, and J. F. Stanton, Molecular Physics 113, 2073 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2014.996619, URL https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2014.996619

work page doi:10.1080/00268976.2014.996619 2073
[27]

H. Wang, X. Zhuang, and T. C. Steimle, The Journal of Chemical Physics 131, 114315 (2009), ISSN 0021-9606, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.3226672/15853028/114315 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3226672

work page doi:10.1063/1.3226672/15853028/114315 2009
[28]

Zhuang and T

X. Zhuang and T. C. Steimle, The Journal of Chemical Physics 140, 124301 (2014), URL https://doi.org/10. 1063/1.4868551. 9

work page 2014
[29]

L. A. Koelemay and L. M. Ziurys, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 958, L6 (2023), URL https://doi.org/ 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0899

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad0899 2023
[30]

T. C. Steimle, J. Chen, J. J. Harrison, and J. M. Brown, The Journal of Chemical Physics 124, 184307 (2006), URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2194551

work page doi:10.1063/1.2194551 2006
[31]

F. A. DeLeeuw and A. Dymanus, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 48, 427 (1973)

work page 1973
[32]

A. Le, T. C. Steimle, L. Skripnikov, and A. V. Titov, The Journal of Chemical Physics 138, 124313 (2013), ISSN 0021-9606, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.4794049/15462617/124313 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4794049

work page doi:10.1063/1.4794049/15462617/124313 2013
[33]

Zhuang, T

X. Zhuang, T. C. Steimle, and C. Linton, The Journal of Chemical Physics 133, 164310 (2010), ISSN 0021-9606, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.3505141/13521406/164310 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3505141

work page doi:10.1063/1.3505141/13521406/164310 2010
[34]

H. Wang, W. L. Virgo, J. Chen, and T. C. Steimle, The Journal of Chemical Physics 127, 124302 (2007), ISSN 0021-9606, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.2778427/10925232/124302 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2778427

work page doi:10.1063/1.2778427/10925232/124302 2007
[35]

D. A. Fletcher, D. Dai, T. C. Steimle, and K. Balasubramanian, The Journal of Chem- ical Physics 99, 9324 (1993), ISSN 0021- 9606, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/99/11/9324/19058597/9324 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.465503

work page doi:10.1063/1.465503 1993
[36]

C. Qin, R. Zhang, F. Wang, and T. C. Steimle, The Journal of Chemical Physics 137, 054309 (2012), ISSN 0021-9606, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.4734596/15452915/054309 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4734596

work page doi:10.1063/1.4734596/15452915/054309 2012
[37]

T. C. Steimle, K. Y. Jung, and B. Li, The Jour- nal of Chemical Physics 103, 1767 (1995), ISSN 0021-9606, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/103/5/1767/19169676/1767 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.469750

work page doi:10.1063/1.469750 1995
[38]

T. C. Steimle and W. L. Virgo, The Journal of Chemical Physics 121, 12411 (2004), ISSN 0021-9606, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/121/24/12411/19158912/12411 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1822917

work page doi:10.1063/1.1822917 2004
[39]

Gengler, T

J. Gengler, T. Ma, A. G. Adam, and T. C. Steimle, The Journal of Chemical Physics 126, 134304 (2007), ISSN 0021-9606, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.2711807/15396366/134304 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2711807

work page doi:10.1063/1.2711807/15396366/134304 2007
[40]

T. C. Steimle, W. L. Virgo, and T. Ma, The Journal of Chemical Physics 124, 024309 (2006), ISSN 0021-9606, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.2145880/13217248/024309 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2145880

work page doi:10.1063/1.2145880/13217248/024309 2006
[41]

Wang and T

F. Wang and T. C. Steimle, The Journal of Chemical Physics 134, 201106 (2011), ISSN 0021-9606, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.3595469/13538519/201106 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3595469

work page doi:10.1063/1.3595469/13538519/201106 2011
[42]

Ladjimi and M

H. Ladjimi and M. Tomza, Phys. Rev. A 109, 052814 (2024), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevA.109.052814

work page 2024
[43]

Tomza, Phys

M. Tomza, Phys. Rev. A 88, 012519 (2013), URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.88.012519

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.88.012519 2013
[44]

Tomza, New Journal of Physics 23, 085003 (2021), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ ac1696

M. Tomza, New Journal of Physics 23, 085003 (2021), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ ac1696

work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ 2021
[45]

X. Liu, L. McKemmish, and J. P´ erez-R´ ıos, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25, 4093 (2023), URL http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1039/D2CP05060A

work page doi:10.1039/d2cp05060a 2023
[46]

L. C. Allen, J. F. Capitani, G. A. Kolks, and G. D. Sproul, Journal of Molecular Structure 300, 647 (1993), ISSN 0022-2860, URL https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/002228609387053C

work page arXiv 1993
[47]

J. A. A. Ketelaar, Chemical Constitution: An Introduc- tion to the Theory of the Chemical Bond (Elsevier Pub- lishing Company, Houston, 1953)

work page 1953
[48]

Note2, note that in the original Van Arkel-Ketelaar Tri- angle, compounds in the left corner are classified as metallic rather than van der Waals

work page
[49]

C. K. Williams and C. E. Rasmussen, Gaussian processes for machine learning , vol. 2 (MIT press Cambridge, MA, 2006)

work page 2006
[50]

X. Liu, G. Meijer, and J. P´ erez-R´ ıos,On the universality of spectroscopic constants of diatomic molecules (2020), 2005.07913

work page arXiv 2020
[51]

X. Liu, G. Meijer, and J. P´ erez-R´ ıos, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22, 24191 (2020), URL http://dx.doi.org/10. 1039/D0CP03810E

work page 2020
[52]

Interpretable Machine Learning for Science with PySR and SymbolicRegression.jl

M. Cranmer, Interpretable Machine Learning for Sci- ence with PySR and SymbolicRegression.jl (2023), arXiv:2305.01582 [astro-ph, physics:physics], URL http: //arxiv.org/abs/2305.01582

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[53]

Werner, P

H.-J. Werner, P. J. Knowles, R. Lindh, F. R. Manby, M. Sch¨ utz, et al.,Molpro, a package of ab initio programs (2008), see http://www.molpro.net

work page 2008
[54]

Schwerdtfeger and J

P. Schwerdtfeger and J. K. Nagle, Molecular Physics 117, 1200 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2018.1535143, URL https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2018.1535143

work page doi:10.1080/00268976.2018.1535143 2019
[55]

Kramida, Yu

A. Kramida, Yu. Ralchenko, J. Reader, and and NIST ASD Team, NIST Atomic Spectra Database (ver. 5.12), [Online]. Available: https://physics.nist.gov/asd [2025, July 3]. National Institute of Standards and Tech- nology, Gaithersburg, MD. (2024)

work page 2025
[56]

Y. Lu, R. Tang, X. Fu, H. Liu, and C. Ning, The Journal of Chemical Physics 154, 074303 (2021), ISSN 0021-9606, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0038560/15585847/074303 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0038560

work page doi:10.1063/5.0038560/15585847/074303 2021
[57]

Zhang, Y

R. Zhang, Y. Yu, T. C. Steimle, and L. Cheng, The Journal of Chemical Physics 146, 064307 (2017), ISSN 0021-9606, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.4975816/14776955/064307 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4975816

work page doi:10.1063/1.4975816/14776955/064307 2017
[58]

Amano and E

T. Amano and E. Hirota, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 45, 417 (1973), ISSN 0022-2852, URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/0022285273902129

work page arXiv 1973
[59]

Byfleet, A

C. Byfleet, A. Carrington, and D. Rus- sell, Molecular Physics 20, 271 (1971), https://doi.org/10.1080/00268977100100251, URL https://doi.org/10.1080/00268977100100251

work page doi:10.1080/00268977100100251 1971
[60]

Story, T

J. Story, T. L. and A. J. Hebert, The Jour- nal of Chemical Physics 64, 855 (1976), ISSN 0021-9606, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/64/2/855/18898914/855 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.432235. 10

work page doi:10.1063/1.432235 1976
[61]

M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, G. Scalmani, V. Barone, G. A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, et al., Gaussian 16 Revi- sion C.01 (2016), Gaussian Inc. Wallingford CT

work page 2016
[62]

Chai and M

J.-D. Chai and M. Head-Gordon, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10, 6615 (2008)

work page 2008
[63]

Weigend, F

F. Weigend, F. Furche, and R. Ahlrichs, The Journal of chemical physics 119, 12753 (2003)

work page 2003
[64]

B. P. Pritchard, D. Altarawy, B. Didier, T. D. Gibson, and T. L. Windus, Journal of chemical information and modeling 59, 4814 (2019)

work page 2019
[65]

Feller, Journal of computational chemistry 17, 1571 (1996)

D. Feller, Journal of computational chemistry 17, 1571 (1996)

work page 1996
[66]

K. L. Schuchardt, B. T. Didier, T. Elsethagen, L. Sun, V. Gurumoorthi, J. Chase, J. Li, and T. L. Windus, Journal of chemical information and modeling 47, 1045 (2007). 11 Molecule CCSD(T) DFT GPR GPR Lower Bound GPR Upper Bound BaAu 4.3630 5.5464 6.02 5.13 6.92 CaAu 3.6100 2.6427 4.55 3.72 5.38 CsAu 11.2520 10.8127 11.82 10.89 12.74 AuF 4.2090 nan 4.82 4....

work page 2007

[1] [1]

K.-K. Ni, T. Rosenband, and D. D. Grimes, Chem. Sci. 9, 6830 (2018), URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/ C8SC02355G

work page 2018

[2] [2]

J. Zhu, S. Kais, Q. Wei, D. Herschbach, and B. Friedrich, The Journal of Chemical Physics 138, 024104 (2013), ISSN 0021-9606, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.4774058/14791601/024104 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4774058

work page doi:10.1063/1.4774058/14791601/024104 2013

[3] [3]

DeMille, Phys

D. DeMille, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 067901 (2002), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88. 067901

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88 2002

[4] [4]

J. L. Bohn, A. M. Rey, and J. Ye, Science 357, 1002 (2017), URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/ CorpusID:206656605

work page 2017

[5] [5]

Sch¨ afer, T

F. Sch¨ afer, T. Fukuhara, S. Sugawa, Y. Takasu, and Y. Takahashi, Nature Reviews Physics 2, 411 (2020), URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-020-0195-3

work page doi:10.1038/s42254-020-0195-3 2020

[6] [6]

P´ erez-R´ ıos,An Introduction to Cold and Ultracold Chemistry (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 2020), ISBN 3030559351

J. P´ erez-R´ ıos,An Introduction to Cold and Ultracold Chemistry (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 2020), ISBN 3030559351

work page 2020

[7] [7]

Kruckenhauser, L

A. Kruckenhauser, L. M. Sieberer, L. De Marco, J.-R. Li, K. Matsuda, W. G. Tobias, G. Valtolina, J. Ye, A. M. Rey, M. A. Baranov, et al., Phys. Rev. A 102, 023320 (2020), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevA.102.023320

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.102.023320 2020

[8] [8]

Micheli, G

A. Micheli, G. K. Brennen, and P. Zoller, Nature Physics 2, 341 (2006), URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ nphys287

work page 2006

[9] [9]

P´ erez-R´ ıos, F

J. P´ erez-R´ ıos, F. Herrera, and R. V. Krems, New Journal of Physics 12, 103007 (2010), URL https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1367-2630/12/10/103007

work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/10/103007 2010

[10] [10]

L. D. Carr, D. DeMille, R. V. Krems, and J. Ye, New Journal of Physics 11, 055049 (2009), URL https:// doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/11/5/055049

work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/11/5/055049 2009

[11] [12]

J. A. Blackmore, L. Caldwell, P. D. Gregory, E. M. Bridge, R. Sawant, J. Aldegunde, J. Mur-Petit, D. Jaksch, J. M. Hutson, B. E. Sauer, et al., Quan- tum Science and Technology 4, 014010 (2018), URL https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/aaee35

work page doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aaee35 2018

[12] [13]

Smucker and J

J. Smucker and J. P´ erez-R´ ıos, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 26, 21513 (2024), URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/ D4CP01956C

work page 2024

[13] [14]

K los, H

J. K los, H. Li, E. Tiesinga, and S. Kotochigova, New Journal of Physics 24, 025005 (2022), URL https://dx. doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ac50ea

work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ac50ea 2022

[14] [15]

A. Marc, M. Hubert, and T. Fleig, Phys. Rev. A 108, 062815 (2023), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevA.108.062815

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.108.062815 2023

[15] [16]

R. F. Garcia Ruiz, R. Berger, J. Billowes, C. L. Bin- nersley, M. L. Bissell, A. A. Breier, A. J. Brinson, K. Chrysalidis, T. E. Cocolios, B. S. Cooper, et al., Na- ture 581, 396 (2020), URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-020-2299-4

work page 2020

[16] [17]

S. M. Udrescu, A. J. Brinson, R. F. G. Ruiz, K. Gaul, R. Berger, J. Billowes, C. L. Binnersley, M. L. Bissell, A. A. Breier, K. Chrysalidis, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 033001 (2021), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.033001

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.033001 2021

[17] [18]

Pauling, Journal of the American Chemical Soci- ety 53, 1367 (1931), URL https://doi.org/10.1021/ ja01355a027

L. Pauling, Journal of the American Chemical Soci- ety 53, 1367 (1931), URL https://doi.org/10.1021/ ja01355a027

work page 1931

[18] [19]

L. Pauling, The nature of the chemical bond and the structure of molecules and crystals : an introduction to modern structural chemistry (3rd ed.) (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y., 1986)

work page 1986

[19] [20]

N. B. Hannay and C. P. Smyth, Journal of the American Chemical Society 68, 171 (1946), https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01206a003, URL https:// doi.org/10.1021/ja01206a003

work page doi:10.1021/ja01206a003 1946

[20] [21]

M. Klessinger, Angewandte Chemie Inter- national Edition in English 9, 500 (1970), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/anie.197005001, URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10. 1002/anie.197005001

work page doi:10.1002/anie.197005001 1970

[21] [22]

´Smia lkowski and M

M. ´Smia lkowski and M. Tomza, Phys. Rev. A 103, 022802 (2021), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevA.103.022802

work page 2021

[22] [23]

Note1, the main difference is in HF since Pauling as- sumed a 63 % of partial ionic character whereas Hanny and Smyth assumed a 41 %

work page

[23] [24]

C. A. Coulson, Valence (Clarendon Press, Oxford, Ox- ford, United Kingdom, 1952)

work page 1952

[24] [25]

L.-R. Liu, M. Aguirre, S. R. Kane, B. K. Kendrick, and B. Hemmerling, Phys. Rev. A 111, 062810 (2025), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/hwwm-1mn7

work page doi:10.1103/hwwm-1mn7 2025

[25] [26]

Zhang, T

R. Zhang, T. C. Steimle, L. Cheng, and J. F. Stanton, Molecular Physics 113, 2073 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2014.996619, URL https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2014.996619

work page doi:10.1080/00268976.2014.996619 2073

[26] [27]

H. Wang, X. Zhuang, and T. C. Steimle, The Journal of Chemical Physics 131, 114315 (2009), ISSN 0021-9606, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.3226672/15853028/114315 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3226672

work page doi:10.1063/1.3226672/15853028/114315 2009

[27] [28]

Zhuang and T

X. Zhuang and T. C. Steimle, The Journal of Chemical Physics 140, 124301 (2014), URL https://doi.org/10. 1063/1.4868551. 9

work page 2014

[28] [29]

L. A. Koelemay and L. M. Ziurys, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 958, L6 (2023), URL https://doi.org/ 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0899

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad0899 2023

[29] [30]

T. C. Steimle, J. Chen, J. J. Harrison, and J. M. Brown, The Journal of Chemical Physics 124, 184307 (2006), URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2194551

work page doi:10.1063/1.2194551 2006

[30] [31]

F. A. DeLeeuw and A. Dymanus, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 48, 427 (1973)

work page 1973

[31] [32]

A. Le, T. C. Steimle, L. Skripnikov, and A. V. Titov, The Journal of Chemical Physics 138, 124313 (2013), ISSN 0021-9606, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.4794049/15462617/124313 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4794049

work page doi:10.1063/1.4794049/15462617/124313 2013

[32] [33]

Zhuang, T

X. Zhuang, T. C. Steimle, and C. Linton, The Journal of Chemical Physics 133, 164310 (2010), ISSN 0021-9606, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.3505141/13521406/164310 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3505141

work page doi:10.1063/1.3505141/13521406/164310 2010

[33] [34]

H. Wang, W. L. Virgo, J. Chen, and T. C. Steimle, The Journal of Chemical Physics 127, 124302 (2007), ISSN 0021-9606, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.2778427/10925232/124302 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2778427

work page doi:10.1063/1.2778427/10925232/124302 2007

[34] [35]

D. A. Fletcher, D. Dai, T. C. Steimle, and K. Balasubramanian, The Journal of Chem- ical Physics 99, 9324 (1993), ISSN 0021- 9606, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/99/11/9324/19058597/9324 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.465503

work page doi:10.1063/1.465503 1993

[35] [36]

C. Qin, R. Zhang, F. Wang, and T. C. Steimle, The Journal of Chemical Physics 137, 054309 (2012), ISSN 0021-9606, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.4734596/15452915/054309 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4734596

work page doi:10.1063/1.4734596/15452915/054309 2012

[36] [37]

T. C. Steimle, K. Y. Jung, and B. Li, The Jour- nal of Chemical Physics 103, 1767 (1995), ISSN 0021-9606, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/103/5/1767/19169676/1767 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.469750

work page doi:10.1063/1.469750 1995

[37] [38]

T. C. Steimle and W. L. Virgo, The Journal of Chemical Physics 121, 12411 (2004), ISSN 0021-9606, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/121/24/12411/19158912/12411 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1822917

work page doi:10.1063/1.1822917 2004

[38] [39]

Gengler, T

J. Gengler, T. Ma, A. G. Adam, and T. C. Steimle, The Journal of Chemical Physics 126, 134304 (2007), ISSN 0021-9606, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.2711807/15396366/134304 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2711807

work page doi:10.1063/1.2711807/15396366/134304 2007

[39] [40]

T. C. Steimle, W. L. Virgo, and T. Ma, The Journal of Chemical Physics 124, 024309 (2006), ISSN 0021-9606, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.2145880/13217248/024309 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2145880

work page doi:10.1063/1.2145880/13217248/024309 2006

[40] [41]

Wang and T

F. Wang and T. C. Steimle, The Journal of Chemical Physics 134, 201106 (2011), ISSN 0021-9606, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.3595469/13538519/201106 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3595469

work page doi:10.1063/1.3595469/13538519/201106 2011

[41] [42]

Ladjimi and M

H. Ladjimi and M. Tomza, Phys. Rev. A 109, 052814 (2024), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevA.109.052814

work page 2024

[42] [43]

Tomza, Phys

M. Tomza, Phys. Rev. A 88, 012519 (2013), URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.88.012519

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.88.012519 2013

[43] [44]

Tomza, New Journal of Physics 23, 085003 (2021), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ ac1696

M. Tomza, New Journal of Physics 23, 085003 (2021), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ ac1696

work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ 2021

[44] [45]

X. Liu, L. McKemmish, and J. P´ erez-R´ ıos, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25, 4093 (2023), URL http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1039/D2CP05060A

work page doi:10.1039/d2cp05060a 2023

[45] [46]

L. C. Allen, J. F. Capitani, G. A. Kolks, and G. D. Sproul, Journal of Molecular Structure 300, 647 (1993), ISSN 0022-2860, URL https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/002228609387053C

work page arXiv 1993

[46] [47]

J. A. A. Ketelaar, Chemical Constitution: An Introduc- tion to the Theory of the Chemical Bond (Elsevier Pub- lishing Company, Houston, 1953)

work page 1953

[47] [48]

Note2, note that in the original Van Arkel-Ketelaar Tri- angle, compounds in the left corner are classified as metallic rather than van der Waals

work page

[48] [49]

C. K. Williams and C. E. Rasmussen, Gaussian processes for machine learning , vol. 2 (MIT press Cambridge, MA, 2006)

work page 2006

[49] [50]

X. Liu, G. Meijer, and J. P´ erez-R´ ıos,On the universality of spectroscopic constants of diatomic molecules (2020), 2005.07913

work page arXiv 2020

[50] [51]

X. Liu, G. Meijer, and J. P´ erez-R´ ıos, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22, 24191 (2020), URL http://dx.doi.org/10. 1039/D0CP03810E

work page 2020

[51] [52]

Interpretable Machine Learning for Science with PySR and SymbolicRegression.jl

M. Cranmer, Interpretable Machine Learning for Sci- ence with PySR and SymbolicRegression.jl (2023), arXiv:2305.01582 [astro-ph, physics:physics], URL http: //arxiv.org/abs/2305.01582

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

[52] [53]

Werner, P

H.-J. Werner, P. J. Knowles, R. Lindh, F. R. Manby, M. Sch¨ utz, et al.,Molpro, a package of ab initio programs (2008), see http://www.molpro.net

work page 2008

[53] [54]

Schwerdtfeger and J

P. Schwerdtfeger and J. K. Nagle, Molecular Physics 117, 1200 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2018.1535143, URL https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2018.1535143

work page doi:10.1080/00268976.2018.1535143 2019

[54] [55]

Kramida, Yu

A. Kramida, Yu. Ralchenko, J. Reader, and and NIST ASD Team, NIST Atomic Spectra Database (ver. 5.12), [Online]. Available: https://physics.nist.gov/asd [2025, July 3]. National Institute of Standards and Tech- nology, Gaithersburg, MD. (2024)

work page 2025

[55] [56]

Y. Lu, R. Tang, X. Fu, H. Liu, and C. Ning, The Journal of Chemical Physics 154, 074303 (2021), ISSN 0021-9606, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0038560/15585847/074303 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0038560

work page doi:10.1063/5.0038560/15585847/074303 2021

[56] [57]

Zhang, Y

R. Zhang, Y. Yu, T. C. Steimle, and L. Cheng, The Journal of Chemical Physics 146, 064307 (2017), ISSN 0021-9606, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.4975816/14776955/064307 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4975816

work page doi:10.1063/1.4975816/14776955/064307 2017

[57] [58]

Amano and E

T. Amano and E. Hirota, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 45, 417 (1973), ISSN 0022-2852, URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/0022285273902129

work page arXiv 1973

[58] [59]

Byfleet, A

C. Byfleet, A. Carrington, and D. Rus- sell, Molecular Physics 20, 271 (1971), https://doi.org/10.1080/00268977100100251, URL https://doi.org/10.1080/00268977100100251

work page doi:10.1080/00268977100100251 1971

[59] [60]

Story, T

J. Story, T. L. and A. J. Hebert, The Jour- nal of Chemical Physics 64, 855 (1976), ISSN 0021-9606, https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/64/2/855/18898914/855 1 online.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.432235. 10

work page doi:10.1063/1.432235 1976

[60] [61]

M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, G. Scalmani, V. Barone, G. A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, et al., Gaussian 16 Revi- sion C.01 (2016), Gaussian Inc. Wallingford CT

work page 2016

[61] [62]

Chai and M

J.-D. Chai and M. Head-Gordon, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10, 6615 (2008)

work page 2008

[62] [63]

Weigend, F

F. Weigend, F. Furche, and R. Ahlrichs, The Journal of chemical physics 119, 12753 (2003)

work page 2003

[63] [64]

B. P. Pritchard, D. Altarawy, B. Didier, T. D. Gibson, and T. L. Windus, Journal of chemical information and modeling 59, 4814 (2019)

work page 2019

[64] [65]

Feller, Journal of computational chemistry 17, 1571 (1996)

D. Feller, Journal of computational chemistry 17, 1571 (1996)

work page 1996

[65] [66]

K. L. Schuchardt, B. T. Didier, T. Elsethagen, L. Sun, V. Gurumoorthi, J. Chase, J. Li, and T. L. Windus, Journal of chemical information and modeling 47, 1045 (2007). 11 Molecule CCSD(T) DFT GPR GPR Lower Bound GPR Upper Bound BaAu 4.3630 5.5464 6.02 5.13 6.92 CaAu 3.6100 2.6427 4.55 3.72 5.38 CsAu 11.2520 10.8127 11.82 10.89 12.74 AuF 4.2090 nan 4.82 4....

work page 2007