Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 2 cited by

$^{88}$Sr Reference Data

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper consolidates the physical and optical properties of bosonic strontium-88 into a single, source-traceable dataset for planning cold-atom, clock, and quantum-information experiments.

desk verdict Useful 88Sr compilation, but the 707 nm repump entry is off by ~2.8 GHz against the paper's own level closure—fix the sign and the citation and it will earn its place. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.10487 v2 pith:C2XJRT76 submitted 2025-07-14 physics.atom-ph cond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph

Sebastian Pucher , Sofus Laguna Kristensen , Ronen M. Kroeze This is my paper
classification physics.atom-phcond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph PACS 32.70.Cs32.10.-f
keywords strontium-88atomicreferencedataopticallatticeclocklasercoolingtransitionfrequencieslifetimesRabiisotopeshifts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper assembles a consolidated, source-traceable dataset for the atomic and optical properties of bosonic strontium-88, the isotope at the center of many cold-atom, optical-clock, and quantum-computing experiments. It tabulates transition frequencies, wavelengths, excited-state lifetimes, linewidths, branching ratios, oscillator strengths, saturation intensities, and Rabi frequencies for the blue cooling line at 461 nm, the red intercombination line at 689 nm, the clock line at 698 nm, the 671 nm magnetic-quadrupole line, and the three repump lines through the $^3S_1$ state. Measured values are combined by inverse-variance weighting with a Birge-ratio adjustment when sources disagree, and derived values come from explicit conversion equations. The intended payoff is a single reference an experimentalist can use to plan and evaluate $^{88}\mathrm{Sr}$ experiments and to locate primary sources when higher accuracy is required.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is a chain of standard atomic-physics identities anchored by measured frequencies and lifetimes. Equation (42) links the Einstein A coefficient to oscillator strength; Eq. (43) turns a total decay rate into a dipole matrix element; and Eq. (44), via the Wigner-Eckart theorem, promotes that to the reduced matrix element $\langle J \| e r \| J' \rangle$ using a branching ratio $\beta_i$. Saturation intensity follows from Eqs. (87)-(88), and the Rabi frequency for specified power, beam diameter, and polarization is assembled by Eq. (69). Every derived table entry in Tables 6-12 is a direct output of this chain, so the tables inherit uncertainties from the input lifetimes, frequencies, and branching ratios.

What would settle it

Measure the $^3S_1 \to {}^3P_{0,1,2}$ branching ratios directly, for example by driving each repump transition in a cold $^{88}\mathrm{Sr}$ cloud and comparing photon-scattering rates, and compare them with the theoretical values used here. A disagreement beyond the quoted 1-2 percent uncertainties on $\beta_i$ would require rederiving all the transition-dependent entries in Tables 8-10.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the tables give accurate, properly referenced values for every quantity an experimenter needs to drive and detect the main $^{88}\mathrm{Sr}$ transitions, with uncertainties that faithfully reflect the source data. For each transition the authors report the absolute frequency in hertz, the vacuum and air wavelengths, transition energy, natural linewidth, recoil and Doppler parameters, and the relevant matrix elements. Where multiple measurements exist, they report an inverse-variance weighted mean and enlarge the uncertainty by the Birge ratio when the scatter is too large; where a quantity is not directly measured, such as the $^3S_1$ branching ratios and several polarizabilities, they take theoretical values and say so. The clock transition frequency is taken from the value recommended as a secondary representation of the SI second.

Load-bearing premise

The derived entries in Tables 8-10 rest on branching ratios taken from a single theoretical calculation; if those ratios are wrong, the partial decay rates, reduced matrix elements, and Rabi frequencies built from them are wrong in the same proportion.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The tabulated clock frequency, 429 228 066 418 007.01(9) Hz, can be quoted directly in clock papers and compared across experiments without reopening the primary measurements.
  • The $^3P_1$ lifetime, linewidth, and saturation intensity set the red-MOT Doppler limit at 179.5(4) nK, fixing the expected floor for two-stage cooling.
  • Rabi frequencies listed at 1 mW through a 1 mm beam convert to any experimental geometry by the power and beam-diameter scaling in Eq. (69).
  • The clock Rabi frequency and quadratic Zeeman shift coefficients show at a glance how much magnetic field is worth trading against clock-laser intensity.
  • For the blue 461 nm line, the absence of a direct high-precision frequency measurement means the quoted frequency still rests on a 1936 measurement, and users needing better than the stated uncertainty should measure it themselves.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the theoretical $^3S_1$ branching ratios are later superseded by a direct measurement, Tables 8-10's partial decay rates, reduced matrix elements, and Rabi frequencies would shift proportionally, while the total lifetime and linewidth entries would not.
  • The same combination and conversion machinery could be applied to $^{87}\mathrm{Sr}$, but hyperfine structure would require splitting every line into its $F$-components; the paper already does part of this to infer the $^{88}\mathrm{Sr}$ 707 nm repump frequency.
  • A natural test of the dataset would be to measure the 461 nm transition frequency with modern comb-based techniques; if it moved outside the quoted uncertainty, the affected derived entries such as wavelength, recoil, and Doppler parameters would need revision.
  • Because the derived matrix elements are linear in the branching ratios, small fractional errors in $\beta_i$ become the dominant term in the fractional uncertainty of the repump Rabi frequencies, which are otherwise limited by the lifetime spread.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper is a Steck-style reference compilation for bosonic 88Sr. It consolidates measured and theoretical values for the atomic level structure, scattering lengths, transition frequencies, lifetimes, linewidths, saturation intensities, reduced matrix elements, Rabi frequencies, and isotope shifts for the 1S0→1P1, 1S0→3P0,1,2, and 3P0,1,2→3S1 transitions. The statistical treatment is explicit (weighted means with Birge-ratio uncertainty inflation), and the derived quantities are connected to the input data through a sequence of formulas, most of which are standard and clearly sourced. The abstract claims that the tables provide an up-to-date, accurately referenced dataset for experiments with 88Sr.

Significance. If the numerical entries are correct, this would be a genuinely useful community reference, filling a gap analogous to the alkali D-line data sheets for an alkaline-earth species. The paper's strengths are its transparent statistical method, the clear separation of measured and derived quantities, and the explicit formulas that allow readers to recompute every derived number. The use of CODATA constants and the careful citation of primary sources for most entries are also valuable. However, the central value of the paper is the reliability of the tables, and there are internal inconsistencies and equation-level errors that currently undermine that claim. These issues are local and correctable, but they must be addressed before the dataset can serve as the reference the abstract promises.

major comments (4)
  1. [§5.1, Eq. (35); Table 10] The sign in the hyperfine-to-center-of-gravity conversion in Eq. (35) is reversed. For a measured transition between lower level L and upper level U, the center-of-gravity frequency is ν_CG = ν_meas + Δ_L − Δ_U (equivalently ν_CG = ν_meas − Δ_U + Δ_L); Eq. (35) implements ν_CG = ν_meas − Δ_L + Δ_U. With the quoted 87Sr hyperfine shifts for 3P2 and 3S1, this reverses the sign of the correction and produces the wrong inferred 88Sr frequency. The error is visible internally: using the paper's own absolute frequencies, ν(3P0→3S1) from Table 8 plus ν(1S0→3P0) from Table 11 minus ν(1S0→3P2) from Table 12 closes to 423.913 575 014 THz, whereas Table 10 lists 423.916 34(3) THz. The discrepancy is roughly 2.765 GHz, orders of magnitude larger than the quoted uncertainty, so this entry violates the reference's core accuracy claim. Also, the text attributes the 87Sr input frequency to Ref. [40], but the title of Ref. [40] indicates a measurement of the 1S0→3P2 transition rather than the 3P2→3S1 transition; the source attribution needs to be corrected.
  2. [§4.2.2, Eq. (28)] Eq. (28) is dimensionally inconsistent as printed. Γ_3P1 has units of s^-1, μ_C^2 B^2 has units of J^2, and Δ_10^2 has units of s^-2, so the right-hand side has units of J^2·s rather than s^-1. A factor of 1/ħ^2 is missing from the denominator. The quoted numerical example (Γ_clock of about 2π × 0.3 mHz at 1000 G) is consistent with the standard formula, but the printed equation cannot be evaluated as written and should be corrected.
  3. [§6.3, Eqs. (71) and (72)] The definition of the clock Rabi frequency is inconsistent between Eqs. (71) and (72). Eq. (71) contains both a scalar magnitude B multiplying the prefactor and a dot product (ϵ̂·B); if B is a vector field, the extra B in the prefactor makes the expression scale as B^2 for fixed intensity, while Eq. (72), together with the quoted value of α, requires Ω ∝ |B|√I cosθ. The notation should be repaired (for example, by replacing (ϵ̂·B) with cosθ or with ϵ̂·B̂, and removing the redundant scalar B) so that the two equations agree and the linear-in-B scaling is restored.
  4. [§5.3, Eq. (44); Tables 8-10] The reduced matrix elements, partial decay rates, and Rabi frequencies for the 3S1 decay channels are obtained by combining the measured total 3S1 lifetime with theoretical branching ratios β_i from Ref. [48], as stated at Eq. (44). No experimental measurement of these branching ratios is cited. The derived entries in Tables 8-10 are therefore model-dependent, and the quoted uncertainties reflect only the lifetime statistics and the stated uncertainty of β_i, not the accuracy of the theoretical model. I recommend that the table captions or a dedicated note in Section 5.3 label these entries as theory-dependent, particularly because the abstract promises values suitable for experiment planning.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Tables 6-10 and 12] The 'Natural Line Width' rows are written as '2π× ...', but Eq. (39) defines ∆ν_FWHM = Γ/(2π). As printed, the rows are ambiguous by a factor of 2π; either remove the 2π prefix or rename the row to Γ so that the entries match the definition in the text.
  2. [Table 5] The row for the 1S0–3P0–3P2(mJ=0) magic wavelength is visually merged with the preceding row in the current formatting; please reformat the table so that each magic-wavelength entry is clearly separated.
  3. [Throughout] There are several minor grammatical errors, including 'Several proposal' near Eq. (26), and some sentences in the MOT discussion in Section 5.4 are incomplete. These do not affect the technical content but should be cleaned up in a revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: all tabulated values are externally cited measurements or are computed from such measurements via standard stated formulas; the Table 10 frequency inconsistency is a correctness issue, not a circular self-derivation.

full rationale

The paper is a compilation: every numerical entry is either an externally cited measurement, a weighted mean of such measurements (Eqs. 1-6), or a value computed from those measured inputs by standard, stated formulas (Eqs. 29-46, 69, 87-88). The 3S1 branching ratios used in Tables 8-10 and Eq. (44) come from an independent theoretical database (Ref. [48]), not from the paper's own outputs, so the partial decay rates, reduced matrix elements, and Rabi frequencies are not self-defined. The two self-citations (Refs. [61], [96]) report separate experimental measurements and are not used to justify the paper's own derivation; they are load-bearing only in the sense that any external citation is. The 2.765 GHz discrepancy between Table 10's 3P2→3S1 frequency and the paper's own level-energy closure is a genuine internal-consistency error, plausibly a sign error in Eq. (35), but it does not make the derivation circular: the Table 10 value is still traced to an external 87Sr measurement plus isotope and hyperfine shifts. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no result is equivalent to its inputs by construction. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted in this paper and no new entities are introduced. The derived quantities are standard conversions from cited measurements; the main unstated dependencies are the statistical model and the theoretical branching ratios from Ref. [48].

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The combined measurements are independent and their quoted uncertainties are realistic.
    Section 2 uses inverse-variance weighting and a Birge-ratio correction; if source errors are underestimated, the reported uncertainties are biased.
  • standard math The Wigner-Eckart theorem and reduced-matrix-element formalism apply to the E1 and M2 transitions treated here.
    Used in Secs. 5.3 and 6.3 to convert lifetimes and branching ratios into reduced matrix elements and Rabi frequencies.
  • domain assumption The theoretical branching ratios of the 3S1 state from Ref. [48] are correct for 88Sr.
    Eq. (44) and Tables 8-10 use these beta values to split the measured 3S1 lifetime into partial decay rates.
  • domain assumption Edlen's equation gives the air refractive index under the stated standard conditions.
    Eq. (34) is used to produce all air wavelengths in Tables 6-12.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of $^{88}$Sr Reference Data." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/C2XJRT76

@misc{pith2026250710487,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: $^88$Sr Reference Data},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/C2XJRT76}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.10487}
}
abstract

Strontium-88 is a versatile atomic species often used in quantum optics, precision metrology, and quantum computing. Consolidated atomic data is essential for the planning, execution, and evaluation of experiments. In this reference, we present physical and optical properties of neutral $^{88}$Sr relevant to these applications. Here we focus on experimental results and supplement these with theoretical values. We present equations to convert values and derive important parameters. Tabulated results include key parameters for commonly used transitions in $^{88}$Sr ($^1\mathrm{S}_0 \rightarrow \, ^1\mathrm{P}_1$, $^1\mathrm{S}_0 \rightarrow \, ^3\mathrm{P}_{0,1,2}$, and $^3\mathrm{P}_{0,1,2} \rightarrow \, ^3\mathrm{S}_1$). This dataset serves as an up-to-date reference for studies involving bosonic $^{88}$Sr.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.10487 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Vapor pressure of strontium as a function of temperature, calculated using Eq. 7. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Data of the transitions discussed in this reference. Tables 6-12 list the frequencies, wavelengths, energies, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Polarization-dependent coupling factors for the transition between various Zeeman levels. (a) Wigner [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Neutral Sr I energy level diagram with selected optical transitions. Level energies and transition wave [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Dissipation Enables Strongly Detuning-Dependent Interference in Pulsed Dynamical Decoupling

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Relaxation during pulsed dynamical decoupling makes interference visibility grow linearly with detuning and flips the interference phase by π at resonance, as shown in strontium atoms and a transmon.

  2. Efficient photo-ionizing elimination of detrimental electric fields for Rydberg atoms

    physics.atom-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 6.5 of 10

    Photo-ionizing laser-cooled atoms in a MOT generates plasma that eliminates stray electric fields exceeding 10 V/cm, recovering stable coherent Rydberg excitation in a strontium tweezer array.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

115 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [40]

    Frequency of the Ultranarrow 1S0 → 3P2 Transition in 87Sr

    O. Onishchenko, S. Pyatchenkov, A. Urech, C.-C. Chen, S. Bennetts, G. A. Siviloglou, and F. Schreck, “Frequency of the Ultranarrow 1S0 → 3P2 Transition in 87Sr”, Physical Review A 99, 052503 (2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [48]

    Barakhshan, A

    P. Barakhshan, A. Marrs, A. Bhosale, B. Arora, R. Eigenmann, and M. S. Safronova,Portal for High-Precision Atomic Data and Computation (version 2.0) , University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.https://www.udel. edu/atom, Accessed May 25, 2025. Original data source cited where available. 2022

    work page 2025

  3. [1]

    D. A. Steck, Sodium D Line Data, Available online at http://steck.us/alkalidata, Revision 2.3.3, original revision posted 27 May 2000, 2024

    2000

  4. [2]

    D. A. Steck, Rubidium 85 D Line Data , Available online at http://steck.us/alkalidata, Revision 2.3.3, original revision posted 30 April 2008, 2024

    2008

  5. [3]

    D. A. Steck, Rubidium 87 D Line Data , Available online at http://steck.us/alkalidata, Revision 2.3.3, original revision posted 25 September 2001, 2024

    2001

  6. [4]

    D. A. Steck, Cesium D Line Data, Available online at http://steck.us/alkalidata, Revision 2.3.3, original revision posted 23 January 1998, 2024

    1998

  7. [5]

    The Calculation of Errors by the Method of Least Squares

    R. T. Birge, “The Calculation of Errors by the Method of Least Squares”, Physical Review 40, 207–227 (1932)

    1932

  8. [6]

    A Minimalistic and General Weighted Averaging Method for Inconsistent Data

    M. Trassinelli and M. Maxton, “A Minimalistic and General Weighted Averaging Method for Inconsistent Data”, Revised 21 Dec 2024 (v2), 10.48550/arXiv.2406.08293 (2024)

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.08293 2024

Show all 115 references
  1. [7]

    W. M. Haynes, ed., CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics , 97th ed., CRC Press (Boca Raton, Florida, 2016), p. 2670

    2016

  2. [8]

    CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2022

    P. J. Mohr, D. B. Newell, B. N. Taylor, and E. Tiesinga, “CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2022”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 97, 025002 (2025)

    2025

  3. [9]

    The AME 2020 Atomic Mass Evaluation (II): Tables, Graphs and References

    M. Wang, W. J. Huang, F. G. Kondev, G. Audi, and S. Naimi, “The AME 2020 Atomic Mass Evaluation (II): Tables, Graphs and References”, Chinese Physics C 45, 030003 (2021)

    2021

  4. [10]

    The NUBASE2020 Evaluation of Nuclear Physics Properties

    F. G. Kondev, M. Wang, W. J. Huang, S. Naimi, and G. Audi, “The NUBASE2020 Evaluation of Nuclear Physics Properties”, Chinese Physics C 45, 030001 (2021)

    2021

  5. [11]

    Atomic masses of strontium and ytterbium

    R. Rana, M. H¨ ocker, and E. G. Myers, “Atomic masses of strontium and ytterbium”, Physical Review A 86, 050502 (2012)

    2012

  6. [12]

    J. W. Arblaster, Selected Values of the Crystallographic Properties of the Elements , ASM International (Materials Park, Ohio, 2018)

    2018

  7. [13]

    Vapour Pressure Equations for the Metallic Elements: 298–2500K

    C. B. Alcock, V. P. Itkin, and M. K. Horrigan, “Vapour Pressure Equations for the Metallic Elements: 298–2500K”, Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly 23, 309–313 (1984)

    1984

  8. [14]

    Universality in Few-Body Systems with Large Scattering Length

    E. Braaten and H.-W. Hammer, “Universality in Few-Body Systems with Large Scattering Length”, Physics Reports 428, 259–390 (2006)

    2006

  9. [15]

    Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases

    C. Chin, R. Grimm, P. Julienne, and E. Tiesinga, “Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1225–1286 (2010)

    2010

  10. [16]

    Degenerate Quantum Gases of Strontium

    S. Stellmer, “Degenerate Quantum Gases of Strontium”, Dissertation; Institute of Experimental Physics & IQOQI, Austrian Academy of Sciences, (Faculty of Mathematics, Computer Science and Physics, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria, Jan. 2013)

    2013

  11. [17]

    Magnetoassociation of a Feshbach Molecule and Spin–Orbit Interaction between the Ground and Electronically Excited States

    Y. Takasu, Y. Fukushima, Y. Nakamura, and Y. Takahashi, “Magnetoassociation of a Feshbach Molecule and Spin–Orbit Interaction between the Ground and Electronically Excited States”, Physical Review A 96, 023602 (2017)

    2017

  12. [18]

    Pumping the Zeeman Slower

    J. Samland, “Pumping the Zeeman Slower”, Master’s thesis, (Van der Waals–Zeeman Institute, Institute of Physics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Apr. 15, 2019)

    2019

  13. [19]

    New Tools for Controlling Strontium Atoms with High Spectral and Spatial Resolution

    F. Wallner, “New Tools for Controlling Strontium Atoms with High Spectral and Spatial Resolution”, Master’s thesis, (Physics Department, Technical University of Munich and Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics, Munich, Germany, Dec. 15, 2020). 27 S. Pucher, S. L. Kristensen, ...

    2020

  14. [20]

    H. A. Bethe and E. E. Salpeter, Quantum Mechanics of One- and Two-Electron Atoms , Springer-Verlag (Berlin, Germany, 1957)

    1957

  15. [21]

    Hyperfine Structure in Intermediate Coupling

    G. Breit and L. A. Wills, “Hyperfine Structure in Intermediate Coupling”, Physical Review 44, 470 (1933)

    1933

  16. [22]

    Second-Order Hyperfine and Zeeman Corrections for an ( sl) Configu- ration

    A. Lurio, M. Mandel, and R. Novick, “Second-Order Hyperfine and Zeeman Corrections for an ( sl) Configu- ration”, Physical Review 126, 1758 (1962)

    1962

  17. [23]

    Nuclear Spin Effects in Optical Lattice Clocks

    M. M. Boyd, T. Zelevinsky, A. D. Ludlow, S. Blatt, T. Zanon-Willette, S. M. Foreman, and J. Ye, “Nuclear Spin Effects in Optical Lattice Clocks”, Physical Review A 76, 022510 (2007)

    2007

  18. [24]

    Properties of Metastable Alkaline-Earth-Metal Atoms Calculated Using an Accurate Effective Core Potential

    R. Santra, K. V. Christ, and C. H. Greene, “Properties of Metastable Alkaline-Earth-Metal Atoms Calculated Using an Accurate Effective Core Potential”, Physical Review A 69, 042510 (2004)

    2004

  19. [25]

    High Precision Spectroscopy of Strontium in an Optical Lattice: Towards a New Standard for Frequency and Time

    M. M. Boyd, “High Precision Spectroscopy of Strontium in an Optical Lattice: Towards a New Standard for Frequency and Time”, PhD thesis, JILA and Department of Physics, (University of Colorado Boulder, Aug. 2007)

    2007

  20. [26]

    Magnetic Field- Induced Spectroscopy of Forbidden Optical Transitions with Application to Lattice-Based Optical Atomic Clocks

    A. V. Taichenachev, V. I. Yudin, C. W. Oates, C. W. Hoyt, Z. W. Barber, and L. Hollberg, “Magnetic Field- Induced Spectroscopy of Forbidden Optical Transitions with Application to Lattice-Based Optical Atomic Clocks”, Physical Review Letters 96, 083001 (2006)

    2006

  21. [27]

    Entangling, controlling, and detecting individual strontium atoms in optical tweezer arrays

    I. S. Madjarov, “Entangling, controlling, and detecting individual strontium atoms in optical tweezer arrays”, PhD thesis, (California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA, Jan. 22, 2021)

    2021

  22. [28]

    The Refractive Index of Air

    B. Edl´ en, “The Refractive Index of Air”, Metrologia 2, 71–80 (1966)

    1966

  23. [29]

    Dispersion of Air

    E. R. Peck and K. Reeder, “Dispersion of Air”, Journal of the Optical Society of America 62, 958–962 (1972)

    1972

  24. [30]

    New Equations for Computing Vapor Pressure and Enhancement Factor

    A. L. Buck, “New Equations for Computing Vapor Pressure and Enhancement Factor”, Journal of Applied Meteorology 20, 1527–1532 (1981)

    1981

  25. [31]

    Buck Research Instruments, LLC, CR-1A Hygrometer with Autofill: Operating Manual , Buck Research In- struments, LLC (Boulder, CO, USA, May 2012)

    2012

  26. [32]

    Wavelengths, Transition Probabilities, and Energy Levels for the Spectrum of Neutral Strontium (Sr I)

    J. E. Sansonetti and G. Nave, “Wavelengths, Transition Probabilities, and Energy Levels for the Spectrum of Neutral Strontium (Sr I)”, Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data 39, 033103 (2010)

    2010

  27. [33]

    F. J. Sullivan, Strontium Lines in Arc and Solar Spectra , 3 (University of Pittsburgh Bulletin, 1936)

    1936

  28. [34]

    Accurate Spec- troscopy of Sr Atoms

    I. Courtillot, A. Quessada-Vial, A. Brusch, D. Kolker, G. D. Rovera, P. Lemonde, et al., “Accurate Spec- troscopy of Sr Atoms”, European Physical Journal D 33, 161–171 (2005)

    2005

  29. [35]

    Accuracy evaluation of an optical lattice clock with bosonic atoms

    X. Baillard, M. Fouch´ e, R. Le Targat, P. G. Westergaard, A. Lecallier, Y. Le Coq, G. D. Rovera, S. Bize, and P. Lemonde, “Accuracy evaluation of an optical lattice clock with bosonic atoms”, Opt. Lett. 32, 1812–1814 (2007)

    2007

  30. [36]

    Absolute measurement of the 1S0−3P0 clock transition in neutral 88Sr over the 330 km-long stabilized fibre optic link

    P. Morzy´ nski, M. Bober, D. Bartoszek-Bober, J. Nawrocki, P. Krehlik, L. ´Sliwczy´ nski, M. Lipi´ nski, P. Mas lowski, A. Cygan, P. Dunst, M. Garu´ s, D. Lisak, J. Zachorowski, W. Gawlik, C. Radzewicz, R. Ciury lo, and M. Zawada, “Absolute measurement of the 1S0−3P0 clock tra...

    2015

  31. [37]

    Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM), Recommended Value of the Frequency of the 1S0 → 3P0 Transition of 88Sr, (2021) https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/69375105/88Sr_429THz_2021.pdf/ fc359ab2-0e0f-5345-fd69-ba7d1a1b7327 (visited on 05/25/2025)

    2021

  32. [38]

    Consultative Committee for Time and Frequency (CCTF), Recommendation PSFS-2, 22nd meeting (session II – online), (2021) https://www.bipm.org/en/committees/cc/cctf/22-_2-2021 (visited on 05/21/2025)

    2021

  33. [39]

    The1S0–3P2 Magnetic Quadrupole Transition in Neutral Strontium

    J. Trautmann, D. Yankelev, V. Kl¨ usener, A. J. Park, I. Bloch, and S. Blatt, “The1S0–3P2 Magnetic Quadrupole Transition in Neutral Strontium”, Physical Review Research 5, 013219 (2023)

    2023

  34. [41]

    Hyperfine Structure of 87Sr in the 3P2 Metastable State

    S. M. Heider and G. O. Brink, “Hyperfine Structure of 87Sr in the 3P2 Metastable State”, Physical Review A 16, 1371–1374 (1977)

    1977

  35. [42]

    State- Dependent Optical Lattices for the Strontium Optical Qubit

    A. Heinz, A. J. Park, N. ˇSanti´ c, J. Trautmann, S. G. Porsev, M. S. Safronova, I. Bloch, and S. Blatt, “State- Dependent Optical Lattices for the Strontium Optical Qubit”, Physical Review Letters 124, 203201 (2020)

    2020

  36. [43]

    Lifetime measurement of the 5 s5p 1P1 state in strontium

    I. Pulji´ c, A. Cipriˇ s, D. Aumiler, T. Ban, and N. ˇSanti´ c, “Lifetime measurement of the 5 s5p 1P1 state in strontium”, Phys. Rev. A 111, 032809 (2025). 28 S. Pucher, S. L. Kristensen, R. M. Kroeze REFERENCES

    2025

  37. [44]

    Lifetime of the First 1P1 State of Zinc, Calcium, and Strontium

    A. Lurio, R. L. de Zafra, and R. J. Goshen, “Lifetime of the First 1P1 State of Zinc, Calcium, and Strontium”, Physical Review 134, A1198 (1964)

    1964

  38. [45]

    Hanle effect in the singlet excited states of the alkaline earths

    F. M. Kelly and M. S. Mathur, “Hanle effect in the singlet excited states of the alkaline earths”, Canadian Journal of Physics 58, 1416–1419 (1980)

    1980

  39. [46]

    Photoassociative Spectroscopy at Long Range in Ultracold Strontium

    S. B. Nagel, P. G. Mickelson, A. D. Saenz, Y. N. Martinez, Y. C. Chen, T. C. Killian, P. Pellegrini, and R. Cˆ ot´ e, “Photoassociative Spectroscopy at Long Range in Ultracold Strontium”, Physical Review Letters94, 083004 (2005)

    2005

  40. [47]

    Photoassociation Spectroscopy of Strontium: Re- construction of the Wave Function Near the Last Node

    M. Yasuda, T. Kishimoto, M. Takamoto, and H. Katori, “Photoassociation Spectroscopy of Strontium: Re- construction of the Wave Function Near the Last Node”, Physical Review A 73, 011403(R) (2006)

    2006

  41. [49]

    Alkaline-Earth Atoms in Optical Tweezers

    A. Cooper, J. P. Covey, I. S. Madjarov, S. G. Porsev, M. S. Safronova, and M. Endres, “Alkaline-Earth Atoms in Optical Tweezers”, Physical Review X 8, 041055 (2018)

    2018

  42. [50]

    Radiative Lifetimes, Diffusion and Energy Pooling of Sr(5s5p (3PJ )) and Sr(5s4d (1D2)) Studied by Time-Resolved Atomic Emission Following Pulsed Dye-Laser Excitation

    D. Husain and G. Roberts, “Radiative Lifetimes, Diffusion and Energy Pooling of Sr(5s5p (3PJ )) and Sr(5s4d (1D2)) Studied by Time-Resolved Atomic Emission Following Pulsed Dye-Laser Excitation”, Chemical Physics 127, 203–225 (1988)

    1988

  43. [51]

    Enhanced Magnetic Trap Loading for Atomic Strontium

    D. S. Barker, B. J. Reschovsky, N. C. Pisenti, and G. K. Campbell, “Enhanced Magnetic Trap Loading for Atomic Strontium”, Physical Review A 92, 043418 (2015)

    2015

  44. [52]

    Cooling and Trapping of Atomic Strontium

    X. Xu, T. H. Loftus, J. L. Hall, A. Gallagher, and J. Ye, “Cooling and Trapping of Atomic Strontium”, Journal of the Optical Society of America B 20, 968–976 (2003)

    2003

  45. [53]

    The Radiative Lifetime of the 1D2 State of Ca and Sr: A Core–Valence Treatment

    J. Bauschlicher C. W., S. R. Langhoff, and H. Partridge, “The Radiative Lifetime of the 1D2 State of Ca and Sr: A Core–Valence Treatment”, Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics 18, 1523 (1985)

    1985

  46. [54]

    Systematic Evaluation of an Atomic Clock at 2 × 10−18 Total Uncertainty

    T. L. Nicholson, S. L. Campbell, R. B. Hutson, G. E. Marti, B. J. Bloom, R. L. McNally, W. Zhang, M. D. Barrett, M. S. Safronova, G. F. Strouse, W. L. Tew, and J. Ye, “Systematic Evaluation of an Atomic Clock at 2 × 10−18 Total Uncertainty”, Nature Communications 6, 6896 (2015)

    2015

  47. [55]

    Measurement of the 3P1 Lifetime in Sr

    M. D. Havey, L. C. Balling, and J. J. Wright, “Measurement of the 3P1 Lifetime in Sr”, Physical Review A 13, 1269 (1976)

    1976

  48. [56]

    Radiative Lifetimes of the Lowest 3P1 Metastable States of Ca and Sr

    R. Drozdowski, M. Ignaciuk, J. Kwela, and J. Heldt, “Radiative Lifetimes of the Lowest 3P1 Metastable States of Ca and Sr”, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik D: Atoms, Molecules and Clusters 41, 125–131 (1997)

    1997

  49. [57]

    Lebensdauer des 5s 5p3P1-Zustands von Strontium

    I.-J. Ma, G. zu Putlitz, and G. Sch¨ utte, “Lebensdauer des 5s 5p3P1-Zustands von Strontium”, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik A: Hadrons and Nuclei 208, 276–285 (1968)

    1968

  50. [58]

    Lifetimes and Oscillator Strengths in the Sr I and Ca I Spectra

    U. Brinkmann, “Lifetimes and Oscillator Strengths in the Sr I and Ca I Spectra”, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik 228, 440–453 (1969)

    1969

  51. [59]

    Direct Measurements of Excited-State Lifetimes in Mg, Ca, and Sr

    M. D. Havey, L. C. Balling, and J. J. Wright, “Direct Measurements of Excited-State Lifetimes in Mg, Ca, and Sr”, Journal of the Optical Society of America 67, 488–491 (1977)

    1977

  52. [60]

    Natural Radiative Lifetimes in the1P1 and 1F3 Sequences of Sr I

    G. J¨ onsson, C. Levinson, A. Persson, and C.-G. Wahlstr¨ om, “Natural Radiative Lifetimes in the1P1 and 1F3 Sequences of Sr I”, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik A: Atoms and Nuclei316, 255–258 (1984)

    1984

  53. [61]

    Long-Lived Coherence on a µHz Scale Optical Magnetic Quadrupole Transition

    V. Kl¨ usener, S. Pucher, D. Yankelev, J. Trautmann, F. Spriestersbach, D. Filin, S. G. Porsev, M. S. Safronova, I. Bloch, and S. Blatt, “Long-Lived Coherence on a µHz Scale Optical Magnetic Quadrupole Transition”, Physical Review Letters 132, 253201 (2024)

    2024

  54. [62]

    Feasibility of Cooling and Trapping Metastable Alkaline-Earth Atoms

    A. Derevianko, “Feasibility of Cooling and Trapping Metastable Alkaline-Earth Atoms”, Physical Review Letters 87, 023002 (2001)

    2001

  55. [63]

    Lifetime Measurement of the Metastable State of Strontium Atoms

    M. Yasuda and H. Katori, “Lifetime Measurement of the Metastable State of Strontium Atoms”, Physical Review Letters 92, 153004 (2004)

    2004

  56. [64]

    Corney, Atomic and Laser Spectroscopy, 1st ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press (Oxford, United Kingdom, 1977)

    A. Corney, Atomic and Laser Spectroscopy, 1st ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press (Oxford, United Kingdom, 1977)

    1977

  57. [65]

    Demtr¨ oder,Laser Spectroscopy: Volume 1: Basic Principles , 4th ed., Springer-Verlag (Berlin Heidelberg, 2008)

    W. Demtr¨ oder,Laser Spectroscopy: Volume 1: Basic Principles , 4th ed., Springer-Verlag (Berlin Heidelberg, 2008). 29 S. Pucher, S. L. Kristensen, R. M. Kroeze REFERENCES

    2008

  58. [66]

    Observation of Atoms Laser Cooled below the Doppler Limit

    P. D. Lett, R. N. Watts, C. I. Westbrook, W. D. Phillips, P. L. Gould, and H. J. Metcalf, “Observation of Atoms Laser Cooled below the Doppler Limit”, Physical Review Letters 61, 169–172 (1988)

    1988

  59. [67]

    A compact and efficient strontium oven for laser-cooling experiments

    M. Schioppo, N. Poli, M. Prevedelli, S. Falke, C. Lisdat, U. Sterr, and G. M. Tino, “A compact and efficient strontium oven for laser-cooling experiments”, Review of Scientific Instruments 83, 103101 (2012)

    2012

  60. [68]

    Repumping and Spectroscopy of Laser-Cooled Sr Atoms Using the (5 s5p) 3P2 → (5s4d) 3D2 Transition

    P. G. Mickelson, Y. N. Mart ´ ınez de Escobar, P. Anzel, B. J. DeSalvo, S. B. Nagel, A. J. Traverso, M. Yan, and T. C. Killian, “Repumping and Spectroscopy of Laser-Cooled Sr Atoms Using the (5 s5p) 3P2 → (5s4d) 3D2 Transition”, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Opti...

    2009

  61. [69]

    Reservoir spectroscopy of 5 s5p 3P 2–5snd 3D1,2,3 transitions in strontium

    S. Stellmer and F. Schreck, “Reservoir spectroscopy of 5 s5p 3P 2–5snd 3D1,2,3 transitions in strontium”, Phys. Rev. A 90, 022512 (2014)

    2014

  62. [70]

    Analyzing the optical pumping on the 5 s4d 1D2 −5s8p 1P1 transition in a magneto-optical trap of Sr atoms

    N. Okamoto, T. Aoki, and Y. Torii, “Analyzing the optical pumping on the 5 s4d 1D2 −5s8p 1P1 transition in a magneto-optical trap of Sr atoms”, 10.48550/arXiv.2508.04109 (2025)

    2025 doi

  63. [71]

    Ultracold collisions in atomic strontium

    S. B. Nagel, “Ultracold collisions in atomic strontium”, PhD thesis, (Rice University, Houston, TX, Feb. 2008)

    2008

  64. [72]

    Magnetic trapping of metastable 3P2 atomic strontium

    S. B. Nagel, C. E. Simien, S. Laha, P. Gupta, V. S. Ashoka, and T. C. Killian, “Magnetic trapping of metastable 3P2 atomic strontium”, Physical Review A 67, 011401 (2003)

    2003

  65. [73]

    Magneto-Optical Trapping and Cooling of Strontium Atoms down to the Photon Recoil Temperature

    H. Katori, T. Ido, Y. Isoya, and M. Kuwata-Gonokami, “Magneto-Optical Trapping and Cooling of Strontium Atoms down to the Photon Recoil Temperature”, Physical Review Letters 82, 1116 (1999)

    1999

  66. [74]

    Magnetic field control and laser frequency stabilization for strontium magneto-optical traps

    R. Gonz´ alez Escudero, “Magnetic field control and laser frequency stabilization for strontium magneto-optical traps”, Master’s thesis, (Fakult¨ at f¨ ur Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universit¨ at M¨ unchen and Max-Planck-Institut f¨ ur Quantenoptik, M¨ unchen, Germany, Sept. 15, 2016)

    2016

  67. [75]

    New Tools for Precision Measurement and Quantum Science with Narrow-Linewidth Optical Transitions

    M. A. Norcia, “New Tools for Precision Measurement and Quantum Science with Narrow-Linewidth Optical Transitions”, PhD thesis, (University of Colorado, Boulder (JILA), Boulder, CO, USA, 2019)

    2019

  68. [76]

    Narrow-Linewidth Superradiant Lasing with Cold 88Sr Atoms

    S. L. Kristensen, “Narrow-Linewidth Superradiant Lasing with Cold 88Sr Atoms”, PhD thesis, (Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, Dec. 2023)

    2023

  69. [77]

    Production of Quantum-Degenerate Strontium Gases

    S. Stellmer, R. Grimm, and F. Schreck, “Production of Quantum-Degenerate Strontium Gases”, Physical Review A 87, 013611 (2013)

    2013

  70. [78]

    Narrow Line Cooling: Finite Photon Recoil Dynamics

    T. H. Loftus, T. Ido, A. D. Ludlow, M. M. Boyd, and J. Ye, “Narrow Line Cooling: Finite Photon Recoil Dynamics”, Physical Review Letters 93, 073003 (2004)

    2004

  71. [79]

    I. V. Hertel and C.-P. Schulz, Atoms, Molecules and Optical Physics 2: Molecules and Photons – Spectroscopy and Collisions , 1st ed., Vol. 2, Graduate Texts in Physics, Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin, Heidelberg, 2015)

    2015

  72. [80]

    Optical Dipole Traps for Neutral Atoms

    R. Grimm, M. Weidem¨ uller, and Y. B. Ovchinnikov, “Optical Dipole Traps for Neutral Atoms”, in Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics , Vol. 42 (Academic Press, 2000), pp. 95–170

    2000

  73. [81]

    Dynamical polarizability of atoms in arbitrary light fields: general theory and application to cesium

    F. Le Kien, P. Schneeweiss, and A. Rauschenbeutel, “Dynamical polarizability of atoms in arbitrary light fields: general theory and application to cesium”, The European Physical Journal D 67, 92 (2013)

    2013

  74. [82]

    Scalar, Tensor, and Vector Polarizability of Tm Atoms in a 532-nm Dipole Trap

    V. V. Tsyganok, D. A. Pershin, E. T. Davletov, V. A. Khlebnikov, and A. V. Akimov, “Scalar, Tensor, and Vector Polarizability of Tm Atoms in a 532-nm Dipole Trap”, Physical Review A 100, 042502 (2019)

    2019

  75. [83]

    A Portal for High- Precision Atomic Data and Computation: Design and Best Practices

    P. Barakhshan, A. Bhosale, A. Kiruga, R. Eigenmann, M. S. Safronova, and B. Arora, “A Portal for High- Precision Atomic Data and Computation: Design and Best Practices”, arXiv preprint, 10. 48550/ arXiv. 2212.10665 (2022)

    2022 doi arXiv

  76. [84]

    Recoil-Free Spectroscopy of Neutral Sr Atoms in the Lamb-Dicke Regime

    T. Ido and H. Katori, “Recoil-Free Spectroscopy of Neutral Sr Atoms in the Lamb-Dicke Regime”, Physical Review Letters 91, 053001 (2003)

    2003

  77. [85]

    Microscopic Control and Detection of Ultracold Strontium in Optical-Tweezer Arrays

    M. A. Norcia, A. W. Young, and A. M. Kaufman, “Microscopic Control and Detection of Ultracold Strontium in Optical-Tweezer Arrays”, Physical Review X 8, 041054 (2018)

    2018

  78. [86]

    Magic Wavelengths of the Sr (5 s2 1S0– 5s5p 3P1) Intercombination Transition near the 5s5p 3P1–5p2 3P2 Transition

    G. Kestler, K. Ton, D. Filin, M. S. Safronova, and J. T. Barreiro, “Magic Wavelengths of the Sr (5 s2 1S0– 5s5p 3P1) Intercombination Transition near the 5s5p 3P1–5p2 3P2 Transition”, Physical Review A 105, 012821 (2022)

    2022

  79. [87]

    State-Insensitive Trapping of Alkaline-Earth Atoms in a Nanofiber-Based Optical Dipole Trap

    G. Kestler, K. Ton, D. Filin, C. Cheung, P. Schneeweiss, T. Hoinkes, J. Volz, M. S. Safronova, A. Rauschen- beutel, and J. T. Barreiro, “State-Insensitive Trapping of Alkaline-Earth Atoms in a Nanofiber-Based Optical Dipole Trap”, PRX Quantum 4, 040308 (2023). 30 S. Pucher, S....

    2023

  80. [88]

    Prospects for Optical Clocks with a Blue-Detuned Lattice

    M. Takamoto, H. Katori, S. I. Marmo, V. D. Ovsiannikov, and V. G. Pal’chikov, “Prospects for Optical Clocks with a Blue-Detuned Lattice”, Physical Review Letters 102, 063002 (2009)

    2009

  81. [89]

    Magic Wavelength at 477 nm for the Strontium Clock Transition

    X. Ma, S. Das, D. Wilkowski, and C. C. Kwong, “Magic Wavelength at 477 nm for the Strontium Clock Transition”, arXiv preprint, 10.48550/arXiv.2507.04532 (2025)

    2025 doi

  82. [90]

    Turquoise Magic Wavelength of the 87Sr Clock Transition

    G. Kestler, R. J. Sedlik, E. C. Trapp, M. S. Safronova, and J. T. Barreiro, “Turquoise Magic Wavelength of the 87Sr Clock Transition”, arXiv preprint, 10.48550/arXiv.2506.18958 (2025)

    2025 doi arXiv

  83. [91]

    An Optical Lattice Clock

    M. Takamoto, F.-L. Hong, R. Higashi, and H. Katori, “An Optical Lattice Clock”, Nature 435, 321–324 (2005)

    2005

  84. [92]

    Three-Dimensional Optical Lattice Clock with Bosonic Atoms

    T. Akatsuka, M. Takamoto, and H. Katori, “Three-Dimensional Optical Lattice Clock with Bosonic Atoms”, Physical Review A 81, 023402 (2010)

    2010

  85. [93]

    Magic Wavelength Measurement of the 87Sr Optical Lattice Clock at NIM

    Q. Wang, Y.-G. Lin, F. Meng, Y. Li, B.-K. Lin, E.-J. Zang, T.-C. Li, and Z.-J. Fang, “Magic Wavelength Measurement of the 87Sr Optical Lattice Clock at NIM”, Chinese Physics Letters 33, 103201 (2016)

    2016

  86. [94]

    Seconds-scale coherence on an optical clock transition in a tweezer array

    M. A. Norcia, A. W. Young, W. J. Eckner, E. Oelker, J. Ye, and A. M. Kaufman, “Seconds-scale coherence on an optical clock transition in a tweezer array”, Science 366, 93–97 (2019)

    2019

  87. [95]

    Realization of a Fast Triple-Magic All-Optical Qutrit in Strontium-88

    M. Ammenwerth, H. Timme, F. Gyger, R. Tao, I. Bloch, and J. Zeiher, “Realization of a Fast Triple-Magic All-Optical Qutrit in Strontium-88”, 10.48550/arXiv.2411.02869 (2024)

    2024 doi

  88. [96]

    Fine-Structure Qubit Encoded in Metastable Strontium Trapped in an Optical Lattice

    S. Pucher, V. Kl¨ usener, F. Spriestersbach, J. Geiger, A. Schindewolf, I. Bloch, and S. Blatt, “Fine-Structure Qubit Encoded in Metastable Strontium Trapped in an Optical Lattice”, Physical Review Letters132, 150605 (2024)

    2024

  89. [97]

    Auzinsh, D

    M. Auzinsh, D. Budker, and S. Rochester, Optically Polarized Atoms: Understanding Light–Atom Interactions (Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2010)

    2010

  90. [98]

    Towards an Optical Clock for Space: Compact, High-Performance Optical Lattice Clock Based on Bosonic Atoms

    S. Origlia, M. S. Pramod, S. Schiller, Y. Singh, K. Bongs, R. Schwarz, A. Al-Masoudi, S. D¨ orscher, S. Herbers, S. H¨ afner, U. Sterr, and C. Lisdat, “Towards an Optical Clock for Space: Compact, High-Performance Optical Lattice Clock Based on Bosonic Atoms”, Physical Review ...

    2018

  91. [99]

    C. J. Foot, Atomic Physics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2004)

    2004

  92. [100]

    Table of experimental nuclear ground state charge radii: An update

    I. Angeli and K. P. Marinova, “Table of experimental nuclear ground state charge radii: An update”, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 99, 69–95 (2013)

    2013

  93. [101]

    Rydberg Series in Strontium Found in Absorption by Selectively Laser-Excited Atoms

    J. R. Rubbmark and S. A. Borgstr¨ om, “Rydberg Series in Strontium Found in Absorption by Selectively Laser-Excited Atoms”, Physica Scripta 18, 196–208 (1978)

    1978

  94. [102]

    Two-Photon Photoassociative Spectroscopy of Ultracold 88Sr2

    Y. N. Mart ´ ınez de Escobar, P. G. Mickelson, P. Pellegrini, S. B. Nagel, A. Traverso, M. Yan, R. Cˆ ot´ e, and T. C. Killian, “Two-Photon Photoassociative Spectroscopy of Ultracold 88Sr2”, Physical Review A 78, 062708 (2008)

    2008

  95. [103]

    Fourier-Transform Spectroscopy of Sr 2 and Revised Ground-State Potential

    A. Stein, H. Kn¨ ockel, and E. Tiemann, “Fourier-Transform Spectroscopy of Sr 2 and Revised Ground-State Potential”, Physical Review A 78, 042508 (2008)

    2008

  96. [104]

    The 1S +1 S Asymptote of Sr 2 Studied by Fourier-Transform Spec- troscopy

    A. Stein, H. Kn¨ ockel, and E. Tiemann, “The 1S +1 S Asymptote of Sr 2 Studied by Fourier-Transform Spec- troscopy”, European Physical Journal D 57, 171–177 (2010)

    2010

  97. [105]

    Spectroscopic Determination of the s-Wave Scattering Lengths of 86Sr and 88Sr

    P. G. Mickelson, Y. N. Mart ´ ınez de Escobar, A. D. Saenz, S. B. Nagel, Y. C. Chen, T. C. Killian, P. Pellegrini, and R. Cˆ ot´ e, “Spectroscopic Determination of the s-Wave Scattering Lengths of 86Sr and 88Sr”, Physical Review Letters 95, 223002 (2005)

    2005

  98. [106]

    Cooling of Sr to High Phase-Space Density by Laser and Sympathetic Cooling in Isotopic Mixtures

    G. Ferrari, R. E. Drullinger, N. Poli, F. Sorrentino, and G. M. Tino, “Cooling of Sr to High Phase-Space Density by Laser and Sympathetic Cooling in Isotopic Mixtures”, Physical Review A 73, 023408 (2006)

    2006

  99. [107]

    Photoionization Cross Sections of Ultracold 88Sr in 1P1 and 3S1 States at 390 nm and the Resulting Blue-Detuned Magic Wavelength Optical Lattice Clock Constraints

    M. Witkowski, S. Bilicki, M. Bober, D. Kovaˇ ci´ c, V. Singh, A. Tonoyan, and M. Zawada, “Photoionization Cross Sections of Ultracold 88Sr in 1P1 and 3S1 States at 390 nm and the Resulting Blue-Detuned Magic Wavelength Optical Lattice Clock Constraints”, Optics Express 30, 214...

    2022

  100. [108]

    Coherent Control of the Fine-Structure Qubit in a Single Alkaline-Earth Atom

    G. Unnikrishnan, P. Ilzh¨ ofer, A. Scholz, C. H¨ olzl, A. G¨ otzelmann, R. K. Gupta, J. Zhao, J. Krauter, S. Weber, N. Makki, H. P. B¨ uchler, T. Pfau, and F. Meinert, “Coherent Control of the Fine-Structure Qubit in a Single Alkaline-Earth Atom”, Physical Review Letters 132, ...

    2024

  101. [109]

    Kramida, Y

    A. Kramida, Y. Ralchenko, J. Reader, and N. A. Team, NIST Atomic Spectra Database (ver. 5.12) , Online at https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/ASD/ [Accessed June 1, 2025], 2024. 31 S. Pucher, S. L. Kristensen, R. M. Kroeze REFERENCES

    2025

  102. [110]

    Resonance Ionization Spectroscopy of Stable Strontium Isotopes and90Sr via 5s 2 1S0→5s5p 1P1→5s5d 1D2→5s11f 1F3→Sr+

    B. Bushaw and W. N¨ ortersh¨ auser, “Resonance Ionization Spectroscopy of Stable Strontium Isotopes and90Sr via 5s 2 1S0→5s5p 1P1→5s5d 1D2→5s11f 1F3→Sr+”, Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 55, 1679–1692 (2000)

    2000

  103. [111]

    Investigation of Isotope Shifts and Stark Shifts in the Stron- tium Rydberg State via 5s 2 1S0→5s5p 1P1→5p1/2→4d3/2 nl j n∗ = 39.4

    C. Zhang, R. Terabayashi, and S. Hasegawa, “Investigation of Isotope Shifts and Stark Shifts in the Stron- tium Rydberg State via 5s 2 1S0→5s5p 1P1→5p1/2→4d3/2 nl j n∗ = 39.4”, Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 225, 107118 (2025)

    2025

  104. [112]

    Precision Frequency Measurement of Visible Intercombination Lines of Strontium

    G. Ferrari, P. Cancio, R. Drullinger, G. Giusfredi, N. Poli, M. Prevedelli, C. Toninelli, and G. M. Tino, “Precision Frequency Measurement of Visible Intercombination Lines of Strontium”, Physical Review Letters 91, 243002 (2003)

    2003

  105. [113]

    Isotope-Shift Spectroscopy of the 1S0 → 3P1 and 1S0 → 3P0 Transitions in Strontium

    H. Miyake, N. C. Pisenti, P. K. Elgee, A. Sitaram, and G. K. Campbell, “Isotope-Shift Spectroscopy of the 1S0 → 3P1 and 1S0 → 3P0 Transitions in Strontium”, Physical Review Research 1, 033113 (2019)

    2019

  106. [114]

    Precise Determination of the Isotope Shift of 88Sr–87Sr Optical Lattice Clock by Sharing Perturbations

    T. Takano, R. Mizushima, and H. Katori, “Precise Determination of the Isotope Shift of 88Sr–87Sr Optical Lattice Clock by Sharing Perturbations”, Applied Physics Express 10, 072801 (2017)

    2017

  107. [115]

    Superradiant Lasers Based on Strontium-88

    M. Tang, “Superradiant Lasers Based on Strontium-88”, PhD thesis, (Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark, Nov. 2022)

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.