Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 82 references

Modular Hamiltonian and entanglement entropy in the BMS free fermion theory

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For two disjoint intervals in the BMS free fermion model, the modular Hamiltonian is a local geometric-flow term plus a bi-local mixing term, and the multi-interval entanglement entropy in the highest-weight vacuum matches the chiral-CFT…

desk verdict First explicit two-interval modular Hamiltonian for BMS free fermions, with a solid core derivation, but the advertised general n-interval entropy formula rests on an unproven WLOG reduction that the authors themselves flag as an ansatz. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.10503 v1 pith:3NP4WP5V submitted 2025-07-14 hep-th

Peng-Xiang Hao , Wen-Xin Lai , Wei Song , Zehua Xiao This is my paper
classification hep-th PACS 03.65.Ud11.25.Hf
keywords BMSfreefermionCarrollianconformalfieldtheorymodularHamiltonianentanglemententropyuniformizationmapdisjointintervalscoherentstatesswingsurface
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper derives the modular Hamiltonian and the entanglement entropy of the BMS-invariant free fermion model, a two-dimensional Carrollian conformal field theory whose symmetry algebra is the BMS$_3$ algebra. The central result is an explicit modular Hamiltonian for two disjoint intervals, given in Eq. (3.67), which is a sum of a local term that generates a geometric modular flow and a bi-local term that mixes fermion operators between the two intervals. The paper also establishes the general relation $S = -\operatorname{tr}[(1-C)\log(1-C)+C\log C]$ between entanglement entropy and the fermion Wightman function $C$, using both coherent states and diagonalization. In the highest-weight vacuum this yields an $n$-interval entropy $S = \frac{1}{6}\bigl[\sum_{i,j}\log|b_i-a_j| - \sum_{i

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the uniformization map $z(x)=-\prod_i(x-a_i)/\prod_i(x-b_i)$, $w=(dz/dx)\,y$, which sends a multi-interval region to a tilted half-line where the modular Hamiltonian is the BMS boost charge. For disjoint intervals the inverse map is multi-valued, so the paper passes to a two-sheeted cover with branch points $z_\pm$ and implements the resulting twisted boundary conditions by a background $\mathrm{U}(1)$ gauge field whose holonomy around each branch point is $\pm i$. Covariantizing the free fermion action with this background field shifts the stress tensor, producing the bi-local mixing term in the modular Hamiltonian and an additional phase in the modular flow. The entropy computation uses the resolvent of the Wightman-function operator, whose singular integral equations are solved with the uniformization map, together with the coherent-state identity $S=-\operatorname{tr}[(1-C)\log(1-C)+C\log C]$.

What would settle it

Compute the entanglement entropy from the Wightman-function resolvent for a generic three-interval configuration whose endpoint $y$-coordinates do not satisfy the analogue of (3.34), and compare with formula (4.32); any mismatch would show that the assumed without-loss-of-generality BMS reduction fails for $n>2$. A more direct check is to numerically diagonalize the discretized two-point function restricted to such a three-interval region and compare the resulting $S$ from (4.23) with (4.32).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that for two disjoint intervals in the BMS free fermion model the modular Hamiltonian takes the compact double-integral form (3.67): the first line reproduces the chiral-fermion bi-local term, and the second line adds a BMS-specific contribution with $\delta(z(x)-z(x'))$ and $\delta(1/z(x)-1/z(x'))$ kernels weighted by $k_+$ and $k_-$. The local part generates a geometric flow along the uniformization coordinate, while the bi-local part mixes fields at the two points $x_1$ and $x_2=-ab/x_1$, the two branches of the inverse uniformization map. The paper further claims that the entanglement entropy in the highest-weight vacuum is given by Eq. (4.32), which coincides with the chiral-CFT formula for $c_L=1$, $c_M=0$, and that this result is compatible with the holographic swing surface proposal for single and two intervals in the relevant limits.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that every multi-interval endpoint configuration can, after a global BMS transformation, be brought to the symmetric family whose $y$-coordinates satisfy (3.34) and whose uniformization map is (3.68); the paper verifies the cross-ratio nontriviality for two intervals but extends the claim to $n>2$ by analogy with the chiral-fermion construction.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The modular Hamiltonian (3.67) gives an explicit realization of modular flow for disjoint intervals in a Carrollian CFT: local geometric transport plus a replica-mixing rotation with angle determined by the background gauge field.
  • The relation $S=-\operatorname{tr}[(1-C)\log(1-C)+C\log C]$ reduces entanglement entropy to the spectrum of the two-point function, so any free-fermion Carrollian model with known $C$ can be fed through the same computation.
  • For $n$ intervals in the highest-weight vacuum, the entropy (4.32) depends only on the $x$-separations of the endpoints and on $n$, with no $y$-dependence, because $c_M=0$; the single-interval case reproduces the generalized Rindler result (2.9).
  • The two-interval mutual information $I=\frac{1}{6}\log\bigl(4ab/(a+b)^2\bigr)$ vanishes as the intervals separate and diverges as they approach, qualitatively matching the holographic swing-surface phase structure.
  • In the induced vacuum the entanglement entropy vanishes for any interval, which the paper interprets as the induced vacuum being a pointwise product state.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper treats the reduction of arbitrary multi-interval configurations to the symmetric family (3.68) as without loss of generality, but only checks the cross-ratio invariants for two intervals; until a proof is supplied, the $n>2$ modular Hamiltonian (3.67) and entropy formula (4.32) are conditional on that reduction holding.
  • Because the entropy in the highest-weight vacuum depends only on $x$-separations, the BMS free fermion is entropically indistinguishable from a chiral free fermion in this state; a natural test is whether Rényi entropies or logarithmic negativity also coincide, or whether the bi-local term shows up in those finer quantities.
  • The coherent-state derivation is model-independent for any quadratic fermionic modular Hamiltonian, but the BMS free boson has a different algebra and would not be covered by the same entropy relation.
  • The background-field phase shift in the modular flow is a genuinely non-geometric effect; checking whether it survives in the exact KMS condition for unequal-time correlators on the physical plane would sharpen the distinction between the two-interval and single-interval dynamics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. This manuscript studies the modular Hamiltonian and entanglement entropy in the BMS-invariant free fermion model. Starting from the known half-line modular Hamiltonian, the authors use a uniformization map and a background U(1) gauge field to derive a modular Hamiltonian for two disjoint intervals, Eq. (3.67), which contains a local geometric-flow term and a bi-local term mixing the two intervals. They then propose a general quadratic ansatz for the modular Hamiltonian and use coherent-state and diagonalization methods to relate the entanglement entropy to the Wightman function, obtaining the n-interval entropy formula Eq. (4.32), which matches the chiral CFT result with c_L=1, c_M=0 and is qualitatively compatible with the swing-surface holographic proposal.

Significance. If the central results hold, the paper provides one of the first explicit multi-interval modular Hamiltonians in a Carrollian/CCFT model, going beyond single-interval symmetry arguments. The two-interval derivation is explicit and passes useful internal consistency checks (the single-interval limit recovers the Rindler result, and the modular correlators satisfy KMS). The entropy formula is essentially parameter-free apart from the UV cutoff, and the comparison with the swing-surface proposal, including the behavior of mutual information, is a valuable quantitative check. The main weakness is that the advertised generality of the results exceeds what is actually proven: the without-loss-of-generality reduction for two intervals and the n-interval extension rest on assertions rather than derivations, and one step in the coherent-state derivation is mathematically incorrect as written.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.2, Eqs. (3.31)-(3.35)] The claim that arbitrary two-disjoint-interval configurations can be mapped by global BMS transformations to the symmetric family (3.32)-(3.34) is not established. The observation that the two quantities in (3.35) are non-trivial only shows that these candidate invariants are not frozen; it does not prove that they form a complete set of invariants of the 6-parameter global BMS group on the 8-dimensional space of two-interval configurations, nor that the orbit of the 4-parameter symmetric family covers all configurations with the same invariants. This step is load-bearing because Eq. (3.67) is the paper's headline modular Hamiltonian. The KMS checks in Sec. 3.3 and the single-interval limit do not test this reduction. Please either give an explicit construction of the BMS transformation for generic endpoints or state precisely that (3.67) is derived only for the family (3.32)-(3.34) and its images, and adjust the abstract and introduction accordingly.
  2. [End of Sec. 3.2 and Sec. 4.3] The generalization to n intervals via the uniformization map (3.68) is asserted 'by analogy' with Ref. [65], but no derivation is given that a generic n-interval configuration can be mapped to a tilted half-line with constant k_+ and k_-. The map (3.68) with constant k_± imposes strong constraints on the endpoint y-coordinates; for large n, dimension counting (2n+2 interval-map parameters plus 6 global BMS parameters versus 4n endpoint coordinates) shows that the orbit of this family cannot cover all configurations. The entropy formula (4.32) is stated for general n without this qualification. Since the entropy is y-independent in the highest-weight vacuum (c_M=0), the entropy result may survive independently of the modular Hamiltonian derivation, but the manuscript should separate these two claims and specify the domain of validity of Eq. (3.67) for n>2.
  3. [Sec. 4.2, Eq. (4.16)] The operator identity e^{-\gamma^T H \beta} = 1 + \gamma^T(e^{-H}-1)\beta is not correct for a multi-mode quadratic Hamiltonian. For example, for H=\epsilon(\gamma_1\beta_1+\gamma_2\beta_2) the left-hand side contains a product term (e^{-\epsilon}-1)^2 n_1 n_2 that is absent from the right-hand side. Consequently, the subsequent claim that the H^{(11)} term in (4.1) does not contribute to the path integral and to the correlation function C is not established by the presented calculation. Because the explicit modular Hamiltonian (3.67) contains \psi_1\psi_1 terms, and because Eqs. (4.22)-(4.23) are used to obtain the entropy, this derivation needs to be repaired, for example by a proper normal-ordering/Bogoliubov argument or by a direct proof that the H^{(11)} terms drop out of the reduced density matrix and the entropy.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (3.35)] The notation x_{12}, y_{12}, etc., is used without definition; please define x_{ij}=x_i-x_j and y_{ij}=y_i-y_j before this equation.
  2. [Sec. 4.4, Eq. (4.37)] The holographic single-interval terms are written as c_L/6 log(b-a)^2 and c_L/6 log(4ab), while the previous equations include an explicit cutoff \epsilon; please specify the regulation used in (4.37) so that the comparison with (4.35) is unambiguous.
  3. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors, including 'Uniformazition' in the title of Sec. 3.1, 'uniformation' after Eq. (3.65), and 'The later of which' in Sec. 4.4; these should be corrected in a final version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the two-interval modular Hamiltonian and multi-interval entropy are genuine outputs of the derivation rather than renamings or fitted inputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular in the sense prohibited here. The input is the half-line modular Hamiltonian H = -∫ z L(z) dz (3.7), supported by Bisognano-Wichmann, together with the model's Wightman functions (2.17) from the prior BMS free-fermion construction. The two-interval modular Hamiltonian (3.67) is obtained by explicit uniformization (3.31), a replicated-fermion orbifold (3.39)-(3.44), and a background gauge field solving the holonomy conditions (3.49)-(3.50); none of these steps assumes the final expression (3.67). The entropy relation (4.23) is the standard free-fermion trace identity, and (4.32) follows by evaluating the resolvent with the given correlation kernel; it is not fitted to the symmetry formula (2.9), although the n=1 limit correctly reproduces that known result as a consistency check. The cited works involving one of the authors, e.g. [36,55,56], are used for comparison or for independent single-interval results, not as the load-bearing construction. The main logical weakness is the asserted 'without loss of generality' reduction in Sec. 3.2 and the n>2 generalization via (3.68), which are unproven reach claims; however, that is a correctness/completeness gap, not an equation-level circularity in which an output reduces to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central derivation rests on the prior BMS fermion model, the standard half-line modular Hamiltonian, a without-loss-of-generality reduction of interval configurations, an ansatz for the modular Hamiltonian kernel structure, and a quoted resolvent. None of these involve data fitting; the only regulator is the UV cutoff epsilon. The background gauge field A_z is a calculational device with no independent physical handle.

free parameters (1)
  • UV cutoff epsilon = infinitesimal (not fitted)
    Introduced to regularize endpoint divergences in the entropy, Eq. (4.32). The coefficient of log epsilon is determined by the theory, so this is a standard regulator rather than a fitted parameter.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The BMS-invariant free fermion model of Refs. [43,51] with action (2.15), stress tensor (2.16) and two-point functions (2.17)-(2.18) is correct.
    All subsequent calculations start from this model and its correlation functions; the model itself is taken from prior work and not re-derived here.
  • standard math The modular Hamiltonian on the half-line R+ is H = -integral_0^infty z L(z) dz (Eq. 3.7).
    Bisognano-Wichmann and Rindler result used as the starting point for the uniformization construction; it is a standard input, not a new derivation.
  • ad hoc to paper Any two-disjoint-interval configuration can be mapped, by a global BMS transformation, to the symmetric endpoint family (3.32)-(3.34), and the n-interval map (3.68) covers the class of intervals studied.
    Asserted in Sec. 3.2 with only a cross-ratio check (3.35) for two intervals; the n>2 case is stated by analogy with Ref. [65] without proof.
  • ad hoc to paper The modular Hamiltonian for a general interval has the ansatz (4.1) with H^(22)=0, antisymmetric and self-adjoint kernels (4.2)-(4.4).
    Introduced in Sec. 4.1 as 'we take the following ansatz', motivated by the explicit two-interval result but not proven for arbitrary regions; it is needed to derive the general entropy formula (4.23).
  • standard math The resolvent R(lambda) in (4.30) solves the singular integral equation for the Wightman function on multi-intervals.
    Quoted from the theory of singular integral equations and Refs. [74,79,80]; the paper does not re-derive it in detail.
  • domain assumption The fermion transformation rule (3.83) under BMS transformations is the correct one for the two-component spinor.
    Used in Eq. (3.65) to map fields from the z-plane to the x-plane; it comes from the representation theory of the BMS fermion model and is not derived in this paper.
invented entities (1)
  • Background U(1) gauge field A_z = (1/(4i))(1/(z-z+) - 1/(z-z-)), Eq. (3.50)
    purpose: Implements the twisted boundary conditions on the two-sheeted cover via holonomy +/-i, converting the orbifold free-fermion action into a free action with a background field.
    It is a calculational device, not a new physical degree of freedom; its holonomy is fixed by the monodromy conditions (3.44). No falsifiable prediction outside the computation is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Modular Hamiltonian and entanglement entropy in the BMS free fermion theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3NP4WP5V

@misc{pith2026250710503,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Modular Hamiltonian and entanglement entropy in the BMS free fermion theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3NP4WP5V}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.10503}
}
read the original abstract

We study the modular Hamiltonian and the entanglement entropy of the BMS-invariant free fermion model. Starting from the modular Hamiltonian on a half-line interval, we calculate the modular Hamiltonian for a region consisting of two disjoint intervals using the uniformization map and a background field method. The resulting modular Hamiltonian contains a local term which generates a geometrical flow, and a bi-local term which mixes operators between the two intervals. We further derive a relation between Wightman functions and the modular Hamiltonian using both diagonalization and a coherent state method. This enables us to compute the entanglement entropy for multi-disjoint intervals. Our explicit results in the BMS free fermion model are compatible with earlier ones based on symmetry and holography.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [65]

    Gluing together Modular flows with free fermions

    G. Wong, Gluing together Modular flows with free fermions , JHEP 04 (2019) 045 [1805.10651]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  2. [1]

    L´ evy-Leblond,Une nouvelle limite non-relativiste du groupe de poincar´ e, in Annales de l’institut Henri Poincar´ e

    J.-M. L´ evy-Leblond,Une nouvelle limite non-relativiste du groupe de poincar´ e, in Annales de l’institut Henri Poincar´ e. Section A, Physique Th´ eorique, vol. 3, pp. 1–12, 1965

    1965

  3. [2]

    Sen Gupta, On an analogue of the galilei group , Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970) 44 (1966) 512

    N. Sen Gupta, On an analogue of the galilei group , Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970) 44 (1966) 512. – 31 –

    1966

  4. [3]

    Duval, G.W

    C. Duval, G.W. Gibbons and P.A. Horvathy, Conformal Carroll groups and BMS symmetry, Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 092001 [ 1402.5894]

    arXiv 2014

  5. [4]

    Duval, G.W

    C. Duval, G.W. Gibbons, P.A. Horvathy and P.M. Zhang, Carroll versus Newton and Galilei: two dual non-Einsteinian concepts of time , Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 085016 [ 1402.0657]

    arXiv 2014

  6. [5]

    Duval, G.W

    C. Duval, G.W. Gibbons and P.A. Horvathy, Conformal Carroll groups , J. Phys. A 47 (2014) 335204 [ 1403.4213]

    arXiv 2014

  7. [6]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases , Rev. Mod. Phys. 80 (2008) 885 [ 0704.3011]

    arXiv 2008

  8. [7]

    Y. Zhou, K. Kanoda and T.-K. Ng, Quantum Spin Liquid States , Rev. Mod. Phys. 89 (2017) 025003 [ 1607.03228]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

Show all 82 references
  1. [8]

    Marangos, Slow light in cool atoms , Nature 397 (1999) 559

    J. Marangos, Slow light in cool atoms , Nature 397 (1999) 559

    1999

  2. [9]

    Hau, S.E

    L.V. Hau, S.E. Harris, Z. Dutton and C.H. Behroozi, Light speed reduction to 17 metres per second in an ultracold atomic gas , Nature 397 (1999) 594

    1999

  3. [10]

    Figueroa-O’Farrill, A

    J. Figueroa-O’Farrill, A. P´ erez and S. Prohazka,Carroll/fracton particles and their correspondence, JHEP 06 (2023) 207 [ 2305.06730]

    2023 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Bidussi, J

    L. Bidussi, J. Hartong, E. Have, J. Musaeus and S. Prohazka, Fractons, dipole symmetries and curved spacetime , SciPost Phys. 12 (2022) 205 [ 2111.03668]

    2022 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Bagchi, A

    A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, R. Basu, M. Islam and S. Mondal, Magic fermions: Carroll and flat bands , JHEP 03 (2023) 227 [ 2211.11640]

    2023 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Figueroa-O’Farrill, A

    J. Figueroa-O’Farrill, A. P´ erez and S. Prohazka,Quantum Carroll/fracton particles , JHEP 10 (2023) 041 [ 2307.05674]

    2023 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Bondi, M.G.J

    H. Bondi, M.G.J. van der Burg and A.W.K. Metzner, Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems , Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 269 (1962) 21

    1962

  8. [15]

    Sachs, Gravitational waves in general relativity

    R.K. Sachs, Gravitational waves in general relativity. 8. Waves in asymptotically flat space-times, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 270 (1962) 103

    1962

  9. [16]

    Barnich and G

    G. Barnich and G. Compere, Classical central extension for asymptotic symmetries at null infinity in three spacetime dimensions , Class. Quant. Grav. 24 (2007) F15 [gr-qc/0610130]

    2007 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Barnich and C

    G. Barnich and C. Troessaert, Aspects of the BMS/CFT correspondence , JHEP 05 (2010) 062 [ 1001.1541]

    2010 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Bagchi, Correspondence between Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes and Nonrelativistic Conformal Field Theories , Phys

    A. Bagchi, Correspondence between Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes and Nonrelativistic Conformal Field Theories , Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 171601 [1006.3354]

    2010 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Fareghbal and A

    R. Fareghbal and A. Naseh, Flat-Space Energy-Momentum Tensor from BMS/GCA Correspondence, JHEP 03 (2014) 005 [ 1312.2109]. – 32 –

    2014 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Cotler, K

    J. Cotler, K. Jensen, S. Prohazka, M. Riegler and J. Salzer, Soft gravitons in three dimensions, JHEP 07 (2025) 002 [ 2411.13633]

    2025 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Donnay, A

    L. Donnay, A. Fiorucci, Y. Herfray and R. Ruzziconi, Bridging Carrollian and celestial holography, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 126027 [ 2212.12553]

    2023 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Donnay, A

    L. Donnay, A. Fiorucci, Y. Herfray and R. Ruzziconi, Carrollian Perspective on Celestial Holography, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022) 071602 [ 2202.04702]

    2022 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Bagchi, S

    A. Bagchi, S. Banerjee, R. Basu and S. Dutta, Scattering Amplitudes: Celestial and Carrollian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022) 241601 [ 2202.08438]

    2022 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Bagchi, P

    A. Bagchi, P. Dhivakar and S. Dutta, AdS Witten diagrams to Carrollian correlators, JHEP 04 (2023) 135 [ 2303.07388]

    2023 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Pasterski, S.-H

    S. Pasterski, S.-H. Shao and A. Strominger, Flat Space Amplitudes and Conformal Symmetry of the Celestial Sphere , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 065026 [ 1701.00049]

    2017 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Pasterski and S.-H

    S. Pasterski and S.-H. Shao, Conformal basis for flat space amplitudes , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 065022 [ 1705.01027]

    2017 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Bagchi and I

    A. Bagchi and I. Mandal, On Representations and Correlation Functions of Galilean Conformal Algebras, Phys. Lett. B 675 (2009) 393 [ 0903.4524]

    2009 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Bagchi, R

    A. Bagchi, R. Gopakumar, I. Mandal and A. Miwa, GCA in 2d , JHEP 08 (2010) 004 [0912.1090]

    2010 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Bagchi, Topologically Massive Gravity and Galilean Conformal Algebra: A Study of Correlation Functions, JHEP 02 (2011) 091 [ 1012.3316]

    A. Bagchi, Topologically Massive Gravity and Galilean Conformal Algebra: A Study of Correlation Functions, JHEP 02 (2011) 091 [ 1012.3316]

    2011 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Oblak, Characters of the BMS Group in Three Dimensions , Commun

    B. Oblak, Characters of the BMS Group in Three Dimensions , Commun. Math. Phys. 340 (2015) 413 [ 1502.03108]

    2015 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Poulias and S

    G. Poulias and S. Vandoren, On Carroll partition functions and flat space holography, JHEP 06 (2025) 232 [ 2503.20615]

    2025 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Bagchi, M

    A. Bagchi, M. Gary and Zodinmawia, Bondi-Metzner-Sachs bootstrap, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 025007 [ 1612.01730]

    2017 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Bagchi, M

    A. Bagchi, M. Gary and Zodinmawia, The nuts and bolts of the BMS Bootstrap , Class. Quant. Grav. 34 (2017) 174002 [ 1705.05890]

    2017 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Ammon, S

    M. Ammon, S. Gray, C. Moran, M. Pannier and K. W¨ olfl, Semi-classical bms-blocks from the oscillator construction , Journal of High Energy Physics 2021 (2021) 1

    2021

  28. [35]

    Bagchi, R

    A. Bagchi, R. Basu, D. Grumiller and M. Riegler, Entanglement entropy in Galilean conformal field theories and flat holography , Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 111602 [1410.4089]

    2015 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Jiang, W

    H. Jiang, W. Song and Q. Wen, Entanglement Entropy in Flat Holography , JHEP 07 (2017) 142 [ 1706.07552]

    2017 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Hijano and C

    E. Hijano and C. Rabideau, Holographic entanglement and Poincar´ e blocks in three-dimensional flat space, JHEP 05 (2018) 068 [ 1712.07131]. – 33 –

    2018 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Barnich and B

    G. Barnich and B. Oblak, Notes on the BMS group in three dimensions: I. Induced representations, JHEP 06 (2014) 129 [ 1403.5803]

    2014 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Barnich and B

    G. Barnich and B. Oblak, Notes on the BMS group in three dimensions: II. Coadjoint representation, JHEP 03 (2015) 033 [ 1502.00010]

    2015 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Chen, P.-X

    B. Chen, P.-X. Hao, R. Liu and Z.-F. Yu, On Galilean conformal bootstrap, JHEP 06 (2021) 112 [ 2011.11092]

    2021 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Chen, P.-x

    B. Chen, P.-x. Hao, R. Liu and Z.-f. Yu, On Galilean conformal bootstrap. Part II. ξ = 0 sector , JHEP 12 (2022) 019 [ 2207.01474]

    2022 arXiv

  35. [42]

    P.-x. Hao, W. Song, X. Xie and Y. Zhong, A BMS-invariant Free Scalar Model , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 125005 [ 2111.04701]

    2022 arXiv

  36. [43]

    P.-X. Hao, W. Song, Z. Xiao and X. Xie, BMS-invariant free fermion models , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 025002 [ 2211.06927]

    2024 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Barnich, A

    G. Barnich, A. Gomberoff and H.A. Gonz´ alez, Three-dimensional Bondi-Metzner-Sachs invariant two-dimensional field theories as the flat limit of Liouville theory , Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 124032 [ 1210.0731]

    2013 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Barnich and H.A

    G. Barnich and H.A. Gonzalez, Dual dynamics of three dimensional asymptotically flat Einstein gravity at null infinity , JHEP 05 (2013) 016 [ 1303.1075]

    2013 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Barnich, H.A

    G. Barnich, H.A. Gonzalez and P. Salgado-Rebolledo, Geometric actions for three-dimensional gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 35 (2018) 014003 [ 1707.08887]

    2018 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Bagchi, S

    A. Bagchi, S. Chakrabortty and P. Parekh, Tensionless Strings from Worldsheet Symmetries, JHEP 01 (2016) 158 [ 1507.04361]

    2016 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Bagchi, A

    A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, S. Chakrabortty and P. Parekh, Inhomogeneous Tensionless Superstrings, JHEP 02 (2018) 065 [ 1710.03482]

    2018 arXiv

  42. [49]

    B. Chen, R. Liu and Y.-f. Zheng, On higher-dimensional Carrollian and Galilean conformal field theories , SciPost Phys. 14 (2023) 088 [ 2112.10514]

    2023 arXiv

  43. [50]

    Bagchi, A

    A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, S. Dutta, K.S. Kolekar and P. Sharma, Carroll covariant scalar fields in two dimensions , JHEP 01 (2023) 072 [ 2203.13197]

    2023 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Yu and B

    Z.-f. Yu and B. Chen, Free field realization of the BMS Ising model , JHEP 08 (2023) 116 [2211.06926]

    2023 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Banerjee, S

    A. Banerjee, S. Dutta and S. Mondal, Carroll fermions in two dimensions , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 125020 [ 2211.11639]

    2023 arXiv

  46. [53]

    de Boer, J

    J. de Boer, J. Hartong, N.A. Obers, W. Sybesma and S. Vandoren, Carroll stories , JHEP 09 (2023) 148 [ 2307.06827]

    2023 arXiv

  47. [54]

    Cotler, K

    J. Cotler, K. Jensen, S. Prohazka, A. Raz, M. Riegler and J. Salzer, Quantizing Carrollian field theories , JHEP 10 (2024) 049 [ 2407.11971]

    2024 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Apolo, H

    L. Apolo, H. Jiang, W. Song and Y. Zhong, Swing surfaces and holographic entanglement beyond AdS/CFT , JHEP 12 (2020) 064 [ 2006.10740]. – 34 –

    2020 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Apolo, H

    L. Apolo, H. Jiang, W. Song and Y. Zhong, Modular Hamiltonians in flat holography and (W)AdS/WCFT, JHEP 09 (2020) 033 [ 2006.10741]

    2020 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Hijano, Flat space physics from AdS/CFT , JHEP 07 (2019) 132 [ 1905.02729]

    E. Hijano, Flat space physics from AdS/CFT , JHEP 07 (2019) 132 [ 1905.02729]

    2019 arXiv

  51. [58]

    Nguyen and P

    K. Nguyen and P. West, Carrollian Conformal Fields and Flat Holography , Universe 9 (2023) 385 [ 2305.02884]

    2023 arXiv

  52. [59]

    Bagchi, P

    A. Bagchi, P. Dhivakar and S. Dutta, Holography in flat spacetimes: the case for Carroll, JHEP 08 (2024) 144 [ 2311.11246]

    2024 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Chen and Z

    B. Chen and Z. Hu, Bulk Reconstruction in Flat Holography , JHEP 03 (2024) 064 [2312.13574]

    2024 arXiv

  54. [61]

    P.-X. Hao, K. Shinmyo, Y.-k. Suzuki, S. Takahashi and T. Takayanagi, Bulk Reconstruction of Scalar Excitations in Flat 3/CCFT2 and the Flat Limit from (A)dS3/CFT2, 2505.20084

  55. [62]

    D. Basu, A. Chandra, V. Raj and G. Sengupta, Entanglement wedge in flat holography and entanglement negativity , SciPost Phys. Core 5 (2022) 013 [2106.14896]

    2022 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Setare and M

    M.R. Setare and M. Koohgard, The minimal entanglement wedge cross section in the GMMG/GCFT flat holography , 2203.08799

    arXiv

  57. [64]

    Liu, Revisiting 3D Flat Holography: Causality Structure and Modular flow , 2309.05220

    Y. Liu, Revisiting 3D Flat Holography: Causality Structure and Modular flow , 2309.05220

    arXiv

  58. [66]

    L´ evy-Leblond,Une nouvelle limite non-relativiste du groupe de Poincar´ e, Annales de l’institut Henri Poincar´ e

    J.-M. L´ evy-Leblond,Une nouvelle limite non-relativiste du groupe de Poincar´ e, Annales de l’institut Henri Poincar´ e. Section A, Physique Th´ eorique3 (1965) 1

    1965

  59. [67]

    Hehl and Y.N

    F.W. Hehl and Y.N. Obukhov, Elie Cartan ’s torsion in geometry and in field theory, an essay , Annales Fond. Broglie 32 (2007) 157 [ 0711.1535]

    2007 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Cartan, On Manifolds with an Affine Connection and the Theory of General Relativity, Monographs and textbooks in physical science, Bibliopolis (1986)

    E. Cartan, On Manifolds with an Affine Connection and the Theory of General Relativity, Monographs and textbooks in physical science, Bibliopolis (1986)

    1986

  61. [69]

    Chen, P.-X

    B. Chen, P.-X. Hao and Z.-F. Yu, 2d Galilean Field Theories with Anisotropic Scaling, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 066029 [ 1906.03102]

    2020 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Barnich, Entropy of three-dimensional asymptotically flat cosmological solutions , JHEP 10 (2012) 095 [ 1208.4371]

    G. Barnich, Entropy of three-dimensional asymptotically flat cosmological solutions , JHEP 10 (2012) 095 [ 1208.4371]

    2012 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Bagchi, S

    A. Bagchi, S. Dutta, K.S. Kolekar and P. Sharma, BMS field theories and Weyl anomaly, JHEP 07 (2021) 101 [ 2104.10405]

    2021 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Baiguera, G

    S. Baiguera, G. Oling, W. Sybesma and B.T. Søgaard, Conformal Carroll scalars with boosts, SciPost Phys. 14 (2023) 086 [ 2207.03468]

    2023 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Bagchi, R

    A. Bagchi, R. Chatterjee, R. Kaushik, A. Saha and D. Sarkar, Non-Lorentzian Kaˇ c-Moody algebras, JHEP 03 (2023) 041 [ 2301.04686]. – 35 –

    2023 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Casini and M

    H. Casini and M. Huerta, Reduced density matrix and internal dynamics for multicomponent regions, Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009) 185005 [ 0903.5284]

    2009 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Castro, D.M

    A. Castro, D.M. Hofman and N. Iqbal, Entanglement Entropy in Warped Conformal Field Theories, JHEP 02 (2016) 033 [ 1511.00707]

    2016 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Ciambelli and C

    L. Ciambelli and C. Marteau, Carrollian conservation laws and Ricci-flat gravity , Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (2019) 085004 [ 1810.11037]

    2019 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Bisognano and E.H

    J.J. Bisognano and E.H. Wichmann, On the Duality Condition for Quantum Fields , J. Math. Phys. 17 (1976) 303

    1976

  70. [78]

    Casini and M

    H. Casini and M. Huerta, Entanglement entropy in free quantum field theory , J. Phys. A 42 (2009) 504007 [ 0905.2562]

    2009 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Mikhlin, Ni muskhelishvili, singular integral equations , Uspekhi Matematicheskikh Nauk 2 (1947) 235

    S.G. Mikhlin, Ni muskhelishvili, singular integral equations , Uspekhi Matematicheskikh Nauk 2 (1947) 235

    1947

  72. [80]

    Estrada and R

    R. Estrada and R. Kanwal, Singular Integral Equations , Birkh¨ auser Boston (2012)

    2012

  73. [81]

    Deser, R

    S. Deser, R. Jackiw and S. Templeton, Three-dimensional massive gauge theories , Physical Review Letters 48 (1982) 975

    1982

  74. [82]

    Bagchi, S

    A. Bagchi, S. Detournay and D. Grumiller, Flat-Space Chiral Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 151301 [ 1208.1658]. – 36 –

    2012 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.