Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 49 references

KPZ equation from a class of nonlinear SPDEs in infinite volume

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that weakly nonlinear Ginzburg-Landau SPDEs on the whole line converge to the KPZ equation, even from non-equilibrium initial data.

desk verdict Genuine new result—full-line non-equilibrium KPZ universality for a class of Ginzburg-Landau SPDEs—with one honest caveat: the abstract's 'essentially arbitrary initial data' outruns the entropy assumption the proof actually needs. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.10545 v4 pith:FSN7C7H2 submitted 2025-07-14 math.PR math-phmath.APmath.MP

Kevin Yang This is my paper
classification math.PRmath-phmath.APmath.MP MSC 60H1560K35
keywords KPZequationGinzburg-LandauSPDEstochasticheatCole-Hopftransformweakuniversalityinfinitevolumenon-equilibriuminitialdatakernel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that a broad class of space-discretized Ginzburg-Landau stochastic PDEs, with weak nonlinearity and starting from essentially arbitrary non-equilibrium initial data on the whole line, converge in the large-scale limit to the KPZ equation. The convergence is proved at the level of the Cole-Hopf variable: the microscopic exponential $Z^N_{t,x}$ converges locally uniformly in probability to the solution of the stochastic heat equation with the corresponding limiting initial data. A separate narrow-wedge construction shows that, after a deterministic normalization, the same Cole-Hopf variable converges to the narrow-wedge stochastic heat equation, and therefore the interface height has Tracy-Widom fluctuations in the double limit. If correct, the paper settles the full-line, non-equilibrium version of the KPZ universality problem for this class of regularizations.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a stochastic heat kernel for a linearly cutoff version of the equation satisfied by a smoothed Cole-Hopf variable. Starting from $Z^N_{t,x} = \exp(\lambda j^N_{t,x} - \lambda R_\lambda t)$, the paper derives an approximate lattice SHE whose error terms are local functions with vanishing jets. These errors are averaged over mesoscopic space-time boxes of length $n_{\mathrm{Av}} = N^{1-3\delta_S/2}$ and time $t_{\mathrm{Av}} = N^{-2/3-10\delta_S}$, where a CLT-type second moment estimate shows the averages are very small. The stochastic heat kernel $K^{N,\zeta}$ for the cut-off equation satisfies the weighted $\ell^1$ estimate $\sup_{s\le t}\sum_y \exp(\kappa|x-y|/N)|K^{N,\zeta}_{s,t,x,y}| \lesssim \exp(N^{-\beta}N^\zeta) N^\delta$, which lets one shrink a spatial cutoff parameter $\zeta$ until the problem is effectively compact and can be compared with a lattice SHE.

What would settle it

The central claim would be falsified by producing a potential $U$ and polynomial $F$ satisfying Assumption 2.2, and initial data satisfying the moment estimates in (2.10) but with density in Assumption 2.4 growing like $N^{1/3}\log N$, for which the second moment bound (6.20) fails; since (6.20) feeds directly into the stochastic heat kernel estimate (4.18), that failure would break the comparison between $Z^N$ and the lattice SHE.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the Cole-Hopf variable of the discretized Ginzburg-Landau SPDE converges to the stochastic heat equation even though the Cole-Hopf map does not exactly linearize the SPDE. Under Assumptions 2.2 and 2.4 and the initial-data estimates in (2.10), Theorem 2.6 states that $Z^N_{t,N X} - Z_{t,X} \to 0$ locally uniformly on $[0,1]\times\mathbb{R}$ in probability, where $Z$ solves the SHE with the limiting initial data. Theorem 2.7 constructs initial data for which a deterministic normalization $T_N$ satisfies $T_N Z^N_{t,N X} \to Z^{\mathrm{nw}}_{t,X}$ locally uniformly in probability, with $Z^{\mathrm{nw}}$ the narrow-wedge SHE; combining this with the known long-time behavior of $\log Z^{\mathrm{nw}}$ yields Tracy-Widom statistics after taking $N\to\infty$ first and then $t\to\infty$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is Assumption 2.4: the initial law, compared with the model's invariant product measure, must have a density bounded by a small power of $N$, essentially $N^{1/3-\gamma_{\mathrm{data}}}$; if the initial data is much farther from equilibrium than this, the local CLT bounds on the error terms and the stochastic heat kernel estimate that carry the whole proof are no longer guaranteed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The rescaled height $h^N = \alpha\beta^{-1}\log Z^N$ converges to the KPZ equation, so this SPDE class exhibits KPZ universality on the full line.
  • The narrow-wedge initial data gives Tracy-Widom fluctuations for the interface after the double limit $N\to\infty$ then $t\to\infty$, extending random-matrix behavior to non-equilibrium data of this model.
  • The limiting coefficients $\alpha$ and $\beta$ depend only on the quadratic piece of the nonlinearity $F$; all higher-degree terms disappear under the weak nonlinearity scaling.
  • The proof gives quantitative rates in $N$ (e.g., $|Z^N - Q^N| \lesssim N^{-\gamma_L}$ on compact sets), so the convergence statements are not merely qualitative.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the stochastic-heat-kernel approach appears to be transferable to other infinite-volume singular SPDEs whose noise term satisfies only a weak-type space-time CLT estimate, because the proof cleanly separates CLT cancellations from the analytic heat-kernel expansion.
  • Editorial inference: the entropy bound in Assumption 2.4 is probably not the true threshold; the paper notes that exponentially growing densities can be handled with the relative-entropy techniques of [48], so the load-bearing condition is likely a much weaker relative-entropy growth.
  • Editorial inference: the explicit $(\log N)^{1/9}$ scale in the deterministic $T_N$ suggests a testable prediction that any regularization of this family with a narrowing wedge initial condition produces the same Tracy-Widom law, independent of the shape of the potential $U$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proves that a class of space-discretized nonlinear Ginzburg-Landau SPDEs on Z, with explicit product invariant measures and a weak-nonlinearity scaling, rescales to the KPZ equation / stochastic heat equation on R. The main results are Theorem 2.6 (convergence of the Cole-Hopf variable Z^N to the SHE for continuous initial data under Assumptions 2.2, 2.4 and the moment estimates (2.10)) and Theorem 2.7 (convergence, after a deterministic normalization T_N, to the narrow-wedge SHE, yielding Tracy-Widom statistics in the large-N then large-time double limit). The proof is built around a stochastic heat kernel for a linearized version of the Cole-Hopf equation; the key estimate is Proposition 4.7, and the reduction to the compact setting is carried out in Lemmas 4.6, 4.9 and Proposition 4.10.

Significance. If the proof closes, this is a substantial advance: it addresses open problem 6 from Hairer-Quastel 2018 for this class of regularizations, gives the first full-line non-equilibrium derivation of KPZ from a Ginzburg-Landau type SPDE, and combines with [4] to produce Tracy-Widom statistics from the microscopic dynamics. The paper has real structural strengths: the limiting parameters alpha, beta, lambda and the renormalization constant R_lambda are explicit functionals of U and F, not fitted quantities; the main estimates are stated as propositions with at least outline-level proofs; and the paper is transparent about its main assumption (Assumption 2.4), including where the assumption is used and that removing it is unclear. The stochastic heat kernel estimate (4.18) is a technically interesting object in its own right.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 6.3, Eq. (6.26), Lemmas 6.8 and 6.10] The chain of inequalities in (6.26) does not follow from the stated estimates. Lemma 6.8 with l_* ≍ ℓ and Lemma 6.10 give ℓ^3 · max_j E0|f_j|^2, and for f_j = Ψ[ℓ] − Ψ[2ℓ] the bound (6.25) gives max_j E0|f_j|^2 ≲ ℓ^{−3/2}; the product is ℓ^{3/2}, not O(1). The displayed proof drops this factor, but since the telescoping runs up to ℓ_i ≍ N^{1−ν}, the omitted factor is N^{3/2−o(1)}, which destroys the N^{−7/3} gain and invalidates the conclusion of Proposition 6.6 as written. The proof of Lemma 6.10 suggests that the correct second-moment bound after squaring the third term in (6.37) should be E0|Ψ[ℓ]|^2 ≲ ℓ^{−3}; if so, Eq. (6.25) and its use in (6.26) need to be corrected accordingly. This is load-bearing because Proposition 6.6 feeds directly into Proposition 4.7.
  2. [Assumption 2.4, Eq. (2.9); Remark 3.1; Proposition 6.6 Eq. (6.20); Proposition 4.7 Eq. (4.18)] The advertised claim of 'essentially arbitrary initial data' in the abstract and introduction overstates what is proved. The entropy bound (2.9) is load-bearing: the change-of-measure factor N^{1/3−γ_data} is exactly what produces the N^{−β} margin in (4.18). If (2.9) were weakened to a uniform density bound, Eq. (6.20) would lose its exponential-in-N margin in the sense that the RHS of (4.18) would become exp(N^ζ)N^δ rather than exp(N^{−β}N^ζ)N^δ, and the successive reductions of ζ in Lemma 4.9 and the comparison in Proposition 4.10 would break. The paper itself states after Assumption 2.4 and in Remark 3.1 that removing (2.9) is unclear. I recommend revising the abstract, introduction, and the statements of Theorems 2.6 and 2.7 so that the conditional nature of the result is explicit, and adding a discussion of what a relaxation of (2.9) would require.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 6.2, proof of Lemma 6.3] In the paragraph after (6.11), the text says 'as in the proofs of Lemmas 6.1 and 6.3'; the second reference should be to Lemma 6.2, not Lemma 6.3.
  2. [Section 2.1.2 and proof of Theorem 2.7] The statement that 'log Z^nw − log H converges weakly as t→∞ to the Tracy-Widom distribution' is missing the standard t^{1/3} scaling and centering from Corollary 1.3 of [4]; please correct the sentence and adjust the wording of the double-limit claim accordingly.
  3. [Section 4.5 and Section 8] Section 4.5 says 'In Section 8, we prove Lemma 4.6', but Section 8 is titled 'Proof of Lemma 4.9'; Lemma 4.6 is the elementary estimate stated in Section 4 with its proof omitted. The cross-reference should be corrected.
  4. [Introduction and Abstract] The phrase 'with essentially initial data' (in the introduction, near the description of the main results) appears to be missing the word 'arbitrary'; please correct the typo.
  5. [Section 7.1] The text refers to changes 'marked in red' and earlier to 'blue for emphasis'; since color may not survive production, please replace these references with explicit labels or fonts.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the KPZ/SHE limit is derived from explicit functionals of U and F, with the only substantive caveat being the stated, non-removable entropy hypothesis (2.9).

full rationale

The derivation chain is structurally self-contained. The limiting coefficients alpha, beta, lambda, and R_lambda are explicit functionals of U and F (Eqs. (2.6)-(2.8)), not fitted to the output, and the continuum SHE is not used to define the microscopic model. Theorem 2.6 is established by comparing Z^N to a lattice SHE Q^N through Proposition 4.10, with the final continuum stability argument delegated to the external Bertini-Giacomin result [5]. Theorem 2.7 uses external inputs [4] and [18] for the narrow-wedge solution, heat-kernel convergence, and Dirac-initial-data stability; the normalization T_N is constructed explicitly, of order (log N)^{1/9}. The main genuine caveat is Assumption 2.4: the stochastic heat-kernel estimate (4.18) and Proposition 6.6 rely on the entropy margin gamma_data > 0 in (2.9), and the paper itself states that removing (2.9) is unclear for general U (Section 2 after Assumption 2.4 and Remark 3.1). This makes the main theorems conditional, but the condition is a stated hypothesis entering the proof, not an output renamed as an input. Self-citations [47], [48], and [19] appear as contextual comparisons or as an alternative relaxation scheme and are not load-bearing for the proof of the kernel estimate or the SHE comparison. No step reduces, by the paper's own equations or by a self-citation chain, to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical particles, forces, fields, or conserved quantities. The stochastic heat kernel K^{N,zeta} is a mathematical construction, not an invented entity. No constants are fitted to data: alpha, beta, lambda and R_lambda are explicit functionals of U and F. The technical exponents delta_S and averaging scales are auxiliary choices required by the proof. The main paper-specific postulate is the relative entropy bound in Assumption 2.4, which the authors identify as likely hard to remove.

free parameters (2)
  • delta_S = small > 0, independent of N
    Smoothing length-scale exponent in Definition 4.1; chosen sufficiently small to make estimates work. It is a technical parameter, not fitted to data.
  • t_Av, n_Av = t_Av = N^{-2/3-10 delta_S}, n_Av = N^{1-3 delta_S/2}
    Averaging scales in Definition 4.4; chosen so CLT cancellations dominate. Auxiliary technical scales, not physical fitted constants.
assumptions (8)
  • standard math Product measures P_sigma in (2.5) are invariant for the phi-dynamics (2.3).
    Proved in Appendix A.3 via generator computations; also standard from [20]. Used throughout for change-of-measure estimates.
  • domain assumption Infinite-dimensional SDE (2.3) is well-posed via torus approximation and sub-Gaussian invariant measure marginals.
    Invoked in Remark 2.3 following Appendix A of [20]; needed to define Z^N and to make all subsequent path-space arguments meaningful.
  • standard math Kipnis-Varadhan inequality, Lemma 2.4 of [37].
    Used in the proof of Lemma 6.8 to derive the CLT-type second-moment estimate for space-time block averages.
  • standard math Heat kernel estimates for H^N stated in Proposition A.1.
    These estimates are cited as following from (A.12), (A.24) of [18]; they underpin Lemma 7.2 and the kernel comparisons in Sections 7 and 9.
  • standard math Stability of SHE under spatial discretization, Theorem 2.1 of [5].
    Used to finish Theorem 2.6 after reducing Z^N to the lattice SHE Q^N; the proof is not reproduced.
  • domain assumption Existence and uniqueness of the narrow-wedge SHE solution [4].
    Used in Theorem 2.7 to identify the limiting object and, via Corollary 1.3 of [4], to obtain Tracy-Widom fluctuations.
  • ad hoc to paper Assumption 2.4: relative entropy bound ||dP_init/dP_0||_{L^infinity} <= C N^{1/3 - gamma_data}.
    This is an explicit new assumption introduced for the proof; it feeds into every change-of-measure step and the paper states it is unclear how to remove it.
  • ad hoc to paper The specific discretization (2.1) with explicit invariant measures is the model for which convergence is proved.
    The results do not cover general discretizations; the authors note this discretization also prohibits comparison principles, so the theorem is model-specific.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of KPZ equation from a class of nonlinear SPDEs in infinite volume." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FSN7C7H2

@misc{pith2026250710545,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: KPZ equation from a class of nonlinear SPDEs in infinite volume},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FSN7C7H2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.10545}
}
read the original abstract

We study a general class of nonlinear Ginzburg-Landau SPDEs in infinite volume under weak nonlinearity scaling and with non-equilibrium initial data. We derive the KPZ equation as a continuum limit of these equations. This makes rigorous the original derivation of the KPZ equation from physics in the full-space setting, which was a problem posed by Hairer-Quastel '18. Our analysis is based on a stochastic heat kernel for a linearization of said SPDEs.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [4]

    Probability distribution of the free energy of the continuum directed polymer model in (1+1)-dimensions

    G. Amir, I. Corwin, J. Quastel, “Probability distribution of the free energy of the continuum directed polymer model in (1+1)-dimensions”, Communications in Pure and Applied Math, 64, 466-537, 2011

    work page 2011

  2. [1]

    AimPL: Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation and universality class, available at http://aimpl.org/kpzuniversality

    work page

  3. [2]

    An invariance principle for the 1D KPZ equation

    A. Adhikari, S. Chatterjee, “An invariance principle for the 1D KPZ equation”,Annals of Probability, 52, 6, 2019-2050, 2024

    work page 2019

  4. [3]

    Alberts, K

    T. Alberts, K. Khanin, and J. Quastel, ”The intermediate disorder regime for directed polymers in dimension 1+1”.Annals of Probability, 42, 3, 1212-1256, 2014

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Stochastic Burgers and KPZ Equations from Particle Systems

    L. Bertini, G. Giacomin, “Stochastic Burgers and KPZ Equations from Particle Systems”,Communications in Mathematical Physics, 183, 3, 571-606, 1997

    1997

  6. [6]

    Global well-posedness of the stochastic Abelian-Higgs equations in two dimensions

    B. Bringmann, S. Cao, “Global well-posedness of the stochastic Abelian-Higgs equations in two dimensions”, arXiv:2403.16878, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Uniform Poincare inequalities for unbounded conservative spin systems: the non-interacting case

    P. Caputo, “Uniform Poincare inequalities for unbounded conservative spin systems: the non-interacting case”,Stochastic Processes and Applications, 106, 2, 223-244, 2003

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    Fluctuations of one-dimensional Ginzburg-Landau models in nonequilibrium

    CC. Chang, HT. Yau. “Fluctuations of one-dimensional Ginzburg-Landau models in nonequilibrium”,Communications in Mathematical Physics, 145, 2, 209-234, 1992

    work page 1992

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    The Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation and universality class

    I. Corwin, “The Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation and universality class”,Random Matrices: Theory and Applications, 1, 1, 2012

    2012

  2. [10]

    Stochastic PDE Limit of the Six Vertex Model

    I. Corwin, P. Ghosal, H. Shen, L.-C. Tsai. “Stochastic PDE Limit of the Six Vertex Model”,Communications in Mathematical Physics, 375, 1945-2038, 2020. 58

    1945

  3. [11]

    Corwin, Y

    I. Corwin, Y . Gu, ”Kardar-Parisi-Zhang Equation and Large Deviations for Random Walks in Weak Random Environments”.Journal of Statistical Physics, 166, 150-168, 2017

    2017

  4. [12]

    Open ASEP in the weakly asymmetric regime

    I. Corwin, H. Shen, “Open ASEP in the weakly asymmetric regime”,Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 71, 10, 2065-2128, 2018

    2018

  5. [13]

    ASEP(q,j) converges to the KPZ equation

    I. Corwin, H. Shen, L.-C. Tsai, “ASEP(q,j) converges to the KPZ equation”,Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare, Probabilites et Statistiques, 54, 2, 995-1012, 2018

    2018

  6. [14]

    KPZ equation limit of higher-spin exclusion processes

    I. Corwin, L.-C. Tsai, “KPZ equation limit of higher-spin exclusion processes”,Annals of Probability, 45, 3, 1771-1798, 2017

    2017

  7. [15]

    SPDE Limit of Weakly Inhomogeneous ASEP

    I. Corwin, L.-C. Tsai, “SPDE Limit of Weakly Inhomogeneous ASEP”,Electronic Journal of Probability25, 1-55, 2020

    2020

  8. [16]

    S. Das, H. Drillick, S. Parekh, ”KPZ equation limit of sticky Brownian motion”.Journal of Functional Analysis, 287, 10, 2024

    2024

  9. [17]

    S. Das, H. Drillick, S. Parekh, ”KPZ equation limit of random walks in random environments”. arXiv:2311.09151, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Weakly asymmetric non-simple exclusion process and the KPZ equation

    A. Dembo, L.-C. Tsai, “Weakly asymmetric non-simple exclusion process and the KPZ equation”,Communications in Mathematical Physics, 341, 1, 219-261, 2016

    2016

  11. [19]

    KPZ-type equation from growth driven by a non-Markovian diffusion

    A. Dembo, K. Yang, “KPZ-type equation from growth driven by a non-Markovian diffusion”, arXiv:2311.16095, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  12. [20]

    The Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation as scaling limit of weakly asymmetric interacting Brownian motions

    J. Diehl, M. Gubinelli, N. Perkowski, “The Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation as scaling limit of weakly asymmetric interacting Brownian motions”,Communications in Mathematical Physics, 354, 549-589, 2017

    2017

  13. [21]

    Directed mean curvature flow in noisy environment

    A. Gerasimovics, M. Hairer, K. Matetski, “Directed mean curvature flow in noisy environment”,Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 77, 3, 1850-1939, 2024

    1939

  14. [22]

    Nonlinear Fluctuations of Weakly Asymmetric Interacting Particle Systems

    P. Goncalves, M. Jara, “Nonlinear Fluctuations of Weakly Asymmetric Interacting Particle Systems”,Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 212, 597-644, 2014

    2014

  15. [23]

    Stochastic Burgers equation from long range exclusion interactions

    P. Goncalves, M. Jara, “Stochastic Burgers equation from long range exclusion interactions”,Stochastic Processes and their Applica- tions, 127, 12, 4029-4052, 2017

    2017

  16. [24]

    A stochastic Burgers equation from a class of microscopic interactions

    P. Goncalves, M. Jara, S. Sethuraman, “A stochastic Burgers equation from a class of microscopic interactions”,Annals of Probability, 43, 1, 286-338, 2015

    2015

  17. [25]

    Energy solutions of KPZ are unique

    M. Gubinelli, N. Perkowski, “Energy solutions of KPZ are unique”,Journal of the AMS, 31, 427-471, 2018

    2018

  18. [26]

    The Hairer-Quastel universality result at stationarity

    M. Gubinelli, N. Perkowski, “The Hairer-Quastel universality result at stationarity”,RIMS Symposium on Stochastic Analysis on Large Scale Interacting System, B59, 101-115, 2016

    2016

  19. [27]

    Solving the KPZ equation

    M. Hairer, “Solving the KPZ equation”,Annals of Mathematics, 178, 2, 559-664, 2013

    2013

  20. [28]

    A Theory of Regularity Structures

    M. Hairer, “A Theory of Regularity Structures”.Inventiones Mathematicae, 198, 2, 269-504, 2014

    2014

  21. [29]

    Multiplicative stochastic heat equations on the whole space

    M. Hairer, C. Labbe, “Multiplicative stochastic heat equations on the whole space”,Journal of the EMS, 20, 4, 1005-1054, 2018

    2018

  22. [30]

    A class of growth models rescaling to KPZ

    M. Hairer, J. Quastel, “A class of growth models rescaling to KPZ”,Forum of Mathematics, Pi, 6, E3, 2018

    2018

  23. [31]

    A central limit theorem for the KPZ equation

    M. Hairer, H. Shen, “A central limit theorem for the KPZ equation”,Annals of Probability, 45, 4167-4221, 2017

    2017

  24. [32]

    Large scale limit of interface fluctuation models

    M. Hairer, W. Xu. “Large scale limit of interface fluctuation models”,Annals of Probability, 47, 6, 3478-3550, 2019

    2019

  25. [33]

    Theory of dynamic critical phenomena

    P. C. Hohenberg, B. I. Halperin, “Theory of dynamic critical phenomena”,Reviews of Modern Physics, 49, 435, 1977

    1977

  26. [34]

    Dynamic scaling of growing interfaces

    M. Kardar, G. Parisi, Y .-C. Zhang, “Dynamic scaling of growing interfaces”,Physical Review Letters56, 889, 1986

    1986

  27. [35]

    Kipnis, C

    C. Kipnis, C. Landim,Scaling Limits of Interacting Particle Systems, Springer-Verlig Berlin Heidelberg, 320, 1999

    1999

  28. [36]

    An approximation of partial sums of independent RV’-s, and the sample DF. I

    J. Koml ´os, P. Major, G. Tusn´ady, “An approximation of partial sums of independent RV’-s, and the sample DF. I”,Zeitschrift f ¨ur Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete, 32, 111-131, 1975

    1975

  29. [37]

    Komorowski, C

    T. Komorowski, C. Landim, S. Olla,Fluctuations in Markov Processes: Time Symmetry and Martingale Approximation, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 1 Edition, 2012

    2012

  30. [38]

    Hairer-Quastel universality for KPZ – polynomial smoothing mechanisms, general nonlinearities and Poisson noise

    F. Kong, H. Wang, W. Xu, “Hairer-Quastel universality for KPZ – polynomial smoothing mechanisms, general nonlinearities and Poisson noise”, arXiv:2403.06191, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    A frequency-independent bound on trigonometric polynomials of Gaussians and applications

    F. Kong, W. Zhao, “A frequency-independent bound on trigonometric polynomials of Gaussians and applications”,Journal of Func- tional Analysis, 288, 3, 110705, 2025

    2025

  32. [40]

    A hierarchy of KPZ equation scaling limits arising from directed random walk models in random media

    S. Parekh, “A hierarchy of KPZ equation scaling limits arising from directed random walk models in random media”. arXiv:2401.06073, 2024

    2024

  33. [41]

    The KPZ equation on the real line

    N. Perkowski, T. Rosati, “The KPZ equation on the real line”,Electronic Journal of Probability, 24, 1-56, 2019

    2019

  34. [42]

    Introduction to KPZ

    J. Quastel, “Introduction to KPZ”,Current Developments in Mathematics, 2011, 1, 2011

    2011

  35. [43]

    Spohn,Large Scale Dynamics of Interacting Particles, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1 edition, 1991

    H. Spohn,Large Scale Dynamics of Interacting Particles, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1 edition, 1991

    1991

  36. [44]

    Vershynin,High-Dimensional Probability: An Introduction with Applications in Data Science, Cambridge University Press, 2018

    R. Vershynin,High-Dimensional Probability: An Introduction with Applications in Data Science, Cambridge University Press, 2018

    2018

  37. [45]

    Kardar-Parisi-Zhang Equation from Long-Range Exclusion Processes

    K. Yang, “Kardar-Parisi-Zhang Equation from Long-Range Exclusion Processes”,Communications in Mathematical Physics, 400, 1535-1663, 2023

    2023

  38. [46]

    Fluctuations for some non-stationary interacting particle systems via Boltzmann-Gibbs Principle

    K. Yang, “Fluctuations for some non-stationary interacting particle systems via Boltzmann-Gibbs Principle”,Forum of Mathematics, Sigma, 11, E32, 2023

    2023

  39. [47]

    Hairer-Quastel universality in non-stationarity via energy solution theory

    K. Yang, “Hairer-Quastel universality in non-stationarity via energy solution theory”,Electronic Journal of Probability, 28, 1-26, 2023

    2023

  40. [48]

    Time-inhomogeneous KPZ equation from non-equilibrium Ginzburg-Landau SDEs

    K. Yang, “Time-inhomogeneous KPZ equation from non-equilibrium Ginzburg-Landau SDEs”,Electronic Journal of Probability, 30, 1-155, 2025

    2025

  41. [49]

    Singular HJB equations with applications to KPZ on the real line

    X. Zhang, R. Zhu, X. Zhu, “Singular HJB equations with applications to KPZ on the real line”,Probability Theory and Related Fields, 183, 789-869, 2022. 59

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.