Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 67 references

Data-insensitive cooling of polar molecules with Rydberg atoms

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proposes cooling hot polar molecules by resonantly swapping their vibrational phonons into cold Rydberg atoms through engineered state-insensitive interactions, leaving the molecular qubit intact.

desk verdict Good molecular engineering, but a fine-structure gap in the vdW scheme needs a quantitative check before the central claim is safe. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.10671 v2 pith:R2P6DVPJ submitted 2025-07-14 quant-ph physics.atom-ph

Jeremy T. Young , Ron Belyansky , Kang-Kuen Ni , Alexey V. Gorshkov This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.atom-ph
keywords polarmoleculesRydbergatomssympatheticcoolingphononswapstate-insensitiveinteractionshybridtweezerarraysvanderWaalsdipolar
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes a coherent sympathetic-cooling method for polar molecules trapped next to cold Rydberg atoms. By choosing molecular and Rydberg states so the interaction is effectively independent of the molecular qubit state, the motion of the two particles couples through a phonon-swap term, transferring the molecule's vibrational heat to the atom. The paper works out three concrete level schemes—van der Waals, microwave-dressed dipolar, and magnetic-field-tuned hyperfine—and estimates cooling ranges of roughly 1 micrometer without fields and 0.7 to 2 micrometers with fields for NaCs and LiCs. If the level engineering holds, this would let molecular quantum registers be cooled without measuring or resetting their stored quantum information.

What carries the argument

The central object is the state-insensitive phonon-swap Hamiltonian: when the molecule-atom potential is $\hat{V} = I_{\text{internal}} \otimes V(\hat{r})$, expanding in position fluctuations yields a beam-splitter-like coupling $G_{am}(\hat{a}^\dagger \hat{m} + \hat{m}^\dagger \hat{a})$ in the rotating frame, with $G_{am} = \partial_z^2 V(r_{am})/\sqrt{4 M_a M_m \omega_a \omega_m}$. The swap is resonant when the dressed trap frequencies match ($\Delta_{am}=0$), and the swap time is $\pi/(2G_{am})$. The level schemes enforce the required factorization through symmetry: $\pm m_N$ molecular qubit states, a Rydberg state in the symmetric superposition $(|m_J=-1/2\rangle + |m_J=+1/2\rangle)/\sqrt2$, microwave dressing to suppress leakage out of the qubit manifold, and hyperfine states whose interactions are nearly independent of nuclear spin projections.

What would settle it

For a single NaCs–Na pair at a separation near 1 micrometer, with the molecule in a superposition of $|N=2, m_N = \pm 2\rangle$ and the Rydberg atom in the symmetric $m_J$ superposition, run one phonon swap at the operating geometry $\theta = \pi/2$ and measure both the molecular qubit coherence and the atomic phonon occupation. If the molecular infidelity rises noticeably faster than $n_{\text{phonons}} \epsilon^2$, or the swap efficiency at the quoted $r_{0.95}$ falls below 95 percent, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that polar molecules can be sympathetically cooled by Rydberg atoms without disturbing the internal-state qubit, provided the molecule-atom interaction factorizes as $\hat{V} = I_{\text{internal}} \otimes V(\hat{r})$. Under this condition, the quadratic expansion of $V$ about the equilibrium separation produces a resonant phonon exchange at rate $G_{am} = \partial_z^2 V(r_{am})/\sqrt{4 M_a M_m \omega_a \omega_m}$, so after a swap time $t_{\text{swap}} = \pi/(2G_{am})$ the molecular vibrational quanta move into the cold auxiliary atom. The paper identifies three level-engineering routes—vdW interactions with qubit states $|N=2, m_N = \pm 2\rangle$ and a symmetric Rydberg $m_J$ superposition, microwave-dressed dipolar interactions, and magnetic-field-tuned hyperfine states—and computes phonon-swap ranges $r_{0.95}$ where $G_{am}/\gamma_r \approx 15$, reaching about 1 $\mu$m without fields and 0.7–2 $\mu$m with magnetic-field tuning for NaCs and LiCs. The qubit fidelity after a swap is bounded by an infidelity proportional to $n_{\text{phonons}} \epsilon^2$, with $\epsilon \lesssim 0.25\%$ for the hyperfine scheme.

Load-bearing premise

The whole scheme rests on the molecule and the Rydberg atom feeling exactly the same force no matter which of the two molecular qubit states is occupied, with any leftover state-dependent coupling kept far off resonance.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Molecular motion in hybrid tweezer arrays can be cooled repeatedly without measurement or state reset, since the cold auxiliary atoms can be re-cooled or replaced.
  • The predicted cooling ranges of roughly 1 micrometer without fields and 0.7–2 micrometers with magnetic-field tuning make the scheme compatible with typical atom-molecule separations in tweezer arrays.
  • The qubit infidelity per swap scales as $n_{\text{phonons}} \epsilon^2$, so for the hyperfine scheme with $\epsilon \lesssim 0.25\%$, the molecular quantum information survives the cooling process.
  • Because the vdW interaction can be tuned to scale like the dipolar interaction via magnetic-field control, vdW and dipolar cooling achieve comparable range, extending the choice of viable Rydberg states.
  • The same state-insensitive interaction engineering supports non-destructive molecular state measurement and Rydberg-mediated molecule-molecule interactions, as the paper notes in its outlook.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: a practical test of the scheme is to measure molecular qubit coherence after one swap with a known phonon number; any infidelity substantially larger than $n_{\text{phonons}} \epsilon^2$ would signal residual state-dependent coupling.
  • Editorial inference: the magnetic-field-tuned hyperfine route likely becomes more favorable for molecules with smaller rotational constants, since the resonance condition allows higher principal quantum numbers and the cooling range grows with $n$.
  • Editorial inference: repeated swap cycles with continuously re-cooled auxiliary atoms could act as a continuous motion refrigerator, potentially extending molecular quantum simulation times beyond current heating-limited lifetimes.
  • Editorial inference: the fidelity calculation assumes coherent-state phonons; a direct extension would test swap fidelity for Fock states, which are more relevant when the molecule is initially in its motional ground state.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a method to sympathetically cool polar molecules using Rydberg atoms while preserving the molecules' internal quantum information. The central idea is to engineer molecule–Rydberg interactions that factorize as V̂ = I_internal ⊗ V(r̂), so that a resonant phonon swap between a hot molecule and a cold auxiliary atom transfers vibrational quanta without disturbing the molecular qubit. Three schemes are presented: van der Waals cooling using Rydberg S states with a symmetric mJ superposition, dipolar cooling via microwave dressing, and a hyperfine-cooling variant using nuclear spin states and magnetic-field tuning. Quantitative figures of merit (the 95% phonon-swap range r0.95 ≈ 1–2 μm for NaCs and LiCs) are computed from C6/C3 coefficients and tabulated in the supplement, together with derivations of the phonon Hamiltonian, 1D-chain numerics, CaF extensions, and a fidelity analysis for deviations from identity interactions.

Significance. If the state-insensitivity premise is quantitatively sound, this is a timely and useful proposal: extending the demonstrated state-insensitive Rydberg cooling framework from atoms to molecules would directly address a known bottleneck in molecule-based quantum computing and simulation. The paper is technically rich: the supplement contains complete derivations, exact 1D-chain numerics, parameter tables for multiple alkali dimers and CaF, and a clear fidelity analysis bounding the effect of residual internal-state-dependent terms. The foundation in Ref. [24] is published and externally benchmarked, so the phonon-swap mechanism itself is not in question. The main uncertainty is whether the proposed level engineering actually realizes the factorized interaction in practice; this is exactly where the paper's load-bearing assumptions need strengthening.

major comments (3)
  1. [Supplement Sec. IV, Eqs. (S10)–(S13)] The central factorization V̂ = I_internal ⊗ V(r̂) is not established for the vdW cooling scheme. At the operating geometry θ = π/2, the fine-structure asymmetry matrix M in Eq. (S12b) has a nonzero off-diagonal element M_12 = (1 − 3 cos 2θ)/180 = 1/45 that couples the symmetric Rydberg superposition |r⟩ = (|mJ = −1/2⟩ + |mJ = +1/2⟩)/√2 to the antisymmetric superposition. Using the stated symmetry relation for |N, ±N⟩ just below Eq. (S9), this coupling has opposite signs for the two molecular qubit states |N = 2, mN = ±2⟩. The off-diagonal contribution therefore cancels only if 2 C6^(1/2) + C6^(3/2) = 0, a relation that is neither derived nor evidently satisfied for the near-resonant states in Table S2 (e.g., Na 70S with δam ≈ 2π × 6 MHz, where fine-structure shifts are comparable to the detuning). The statement that "the remaining relevant contributions from M are all 0" appears to refer only to phonon-displacement couplings, not to the zeroth-order internal-state Hamiltonian, which creates a qubit-state-dependent Rydberg flip term. This term is not bounded by the ε ≲ 0.25% analysis of Supplement Sec. IX, and its effect on qubit coherence during the swap time must be quantified or explicitly suppressed by a demonstrated cancellation.
  2. [Main text, Dipolar cooling; Supplement Sec. V] For the dipolar cooling scheme, the paper assumes that "the other degenerate Rydberg states are detuned in some fashion, such as via another external drive" without providing a concrete level scheme or quantitative analysis. If this assumption fails, the microwave-dressed interaction need not reduce to the pure C3/r^3 (1 − 3 cos^2 θ) form quoted in Eq. (4), and additional state-dependent couplings to other mJ or molecular mN states can reappear. The supplement tabulates C3 and r0.95 values but does not demonstrate that the dressed-state construction eliminates all resonant flip channels; a specific detuning prescription and an estimate of the residual infidelity are needed to support the data-insensitivity claim for the dipolar scheme.
  3. [Tables S2, S3, S7 and Fig. 4] The central quantitative results — the r0.95 phonon-swap ranges — are reported without any uncertainty or sensitivity analysis, despite the values being derived from C6/C3 coefficients that inherit uncertainties from atomic data (ARC) and molecular constants. This is especially concerning for near-resonant entries such as Na 70S, where C6 = −3062 kHz μm^6 depends on a detuning δam = 2π × 6 MHz that is much smaller than typical fine-structure and hyperfine energy scales. Because r0.95 is a central advertised figure of merit, the authors should provide at least a sensitivity estimate with respect to detuning and molecular constants, or explicitly state the precision to which the required resonances must be controlled.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Main text, vdW Cooling] The phrase "ensuring that δmN > 2" should read "|δmN| > 2" to be mathematically precise, since mN differences can be negative.
  2. [Main text, Phonon exchange] The paper states "In the limit ω_z ≫ G" and then lists parameters in Table S2 for which Gam/2π can exceed the assumed trap frequency of 2π × 25 kHz (e.g., Na 70S at aLR/2 gives 442 kHz). It is clear from the discussion that the dressing fraction f can reduce both Gam and γr while keeping Gam/γr fixed, but the text should explicitly state that f is chosen to enforce ω_z ≫ f Gam for every entry.
  3. [Supplement Sec. VIII] There is a typo: "Ising-Teller limit" should be "Inglis-Teller limit" (two occurrences).
  4. [Supplement Tables S2, S3, S7] The column headers mixing square-bracket location markers with unit markers are hard to parse; for example, "Gam,z / 2π (kHz), [aLR/2]" is confusing because it is not immediately clear that the frequency is evaluated at the distance in brackets. A clearer table layout or a caption explaining the convention would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the phonon-swap mechanism is re-derived, and the molecular parameters come from external tabulated data.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The phonon-exchange Hamiltonian, Eqs. (1)-(2), and the coupling rate Gam are derived in the main text and Supplement Sec. I from a state-independent potential V (r), giving the beamsplitter interaction without invoking the target cooling result. The molecular and atomic parameters entering the calculations, such as rotational constants, dipole moments, C6 and C3 coefficients, and hyperfine constants, are taken from external sources (ARC, Aldegunde-Hutson, and other published data) rather than fitted to the claimed swap ranges or fidelities. The central state-insensitivity condition Vhat = I_internal (x) V(rhat) is an explicitly stated engineering premise, and the residual fine-structure asymmetry matrix M in Supplement Eq. (S12) is identified and then assumed to be off-resonant, which is a stated limitation rather than a re-importation of the conclusion. The self-citation to Ref. [24] for the original atomic phonon-swap scheme does not create circularity: the present paper re-derives the relevant Hamiltonian, and Ref. [24] is a parameter-free published derivation with stated assumptions that do not include the molecular results claimed here. The figure of merit r0.95 is defined as the distance where the computed Gam/gamma_r ratio reaches about 15 and is obtained by solving that crossover condition, not by fitting to a target dataset. No 'prediction' in the paper reduces by construction to an input parameter, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported solely through author self-citation. Therefore no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The quantitative claims rest on the phonon-swap mechanism from Ref. [24] (same group), on computed molecule-Rydberg interaction coefficients from published atomic (ARC 3.0) and molecular (Aldegunde-Hutson) data, and on the listed assumptions about resonance, perturbation validity, dissipation, and the rotating-wave approximation. No curve is fitted to any target outcome: r0.95 follows from the defining condition G_am/γ_r ≈ 15, and state choices are screened and reported in full tables rather than selected post hoc. The free parameters listed are standard experimental settings (trap frequency, drive strengths, field cap) plus the stated 95% |rr⟩ detuning design condition. No invented entities are introduced; all schemes use established Rydberg, rotational, and nuclear-spin states.

free parameters (5)
  • molecular microwave drive strength Ω_max = 2π × 1 MHz
    Assumed for rotational dressing; underpins the dressed-state limit V ≪ Ω_max and the ≤0.25% identity-interaction deviation estimate (Supplement Secs. V and VI).
  • trap frequency ω_z = 2π × 25 kHz
    Used for all phonon rates and r0.95 entries in Tables S2, S3, S7, S8; since G_am ∝ 1/√(ω_a ω_m), the quoted ranges scale with this choice.
  • vdW detuning δ_am in hyperfine cooling = chosen so the pair state is 95% |rr⟩ at r_am
    This design condition fixes δ_am ∝ C3/r_am^3 and converts vdW scaling into dipolar-like scaling, which produces the improved r0.95 ∝ n behavior.
  • Rydberg dressing fraction f = tunable, not pinned
    Weak dressing with G_am → f G_am and decay f γ_r, so the swap figure of merit G_am/γ_r is f-independent; f is constrained by G ≪ ω and blockade radius below the lattice constant.
  • magnetic field cap = 100 mT
    Assumed bound for hyperfine cooling; sets which nS states are reachable in Table S7.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Second-order expansion of V(r̂) in phonon displacements, with (√(M_a M_m ω_a ω_m) r_am²)^{-1} ≪ 1
    Drops third- and higher-order terms of the molecule-atom potential; the paper checks this in Table S1 at 1 μm, where values are 0.003-0.07.
  • domain assumption Resonance condition Δ_am = ω_a,z + G_a,z - ω_m,z - G_m,z = 0
    All quoted swap rates assume exact resonance; the text states 'Throughout the text we assume Δ_am = 0' (main text, Phonon exchange section).
  • domain assumption Small pair-state admixture, i.e., validity of second-order perturbation theory for C6
    Underlies Supplement Eq. (S9); authors flag that near-resonances (70S Na, 47S Rb) violate it at short distances, with fmix ≈ 1.5 at aLR/2.
  • domain assumption Rydberg spontaneous decay is the dominant dissipation channel
    Swap efficiency is computed from the single rate γ_r (Supplement Sec. I.A); collisional, blackbody, and photoionization losses are not quantified.
  • domain assumption Rotating-wave approximation ω_z ≫ G_am
    Counter-rotating phonon terms are dropped in Eq. (1); numerically checked at ω_z = 10-50 G_am in Supplement Fig. S1 (swap efficiency 0.982-0.999).
  • standard math Wigner-Eckart theorem and standard angular momentum algebra
    Basis for the D-matrix and reduced-dipole derivations in Supplement Sec. IV; no exotic mathematics is invoked.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Data-insensitive cooling of polar molecules with Rydberg atoms." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/R2P6DVPJ

@misc{pith2026250710671,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Data-insensitive cooling of polar molecules with Rydberg atoms},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/R2P6DVPJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.10671}
}
read the original abstract

We propose a method to sympathetically cool polar molecules with Rydberg atoms without destroying the quantum information encoded in the polar molecules. While the interactions between the two are usually state-dependent, we show how to engineer state-insensitive interactions between the hot molecules and the cold atoms with a suitable choice of internal states and the application of external fields. The resulting interactions, which may be van der Waals or dipolar, induce a phonon swap interaction between the two species, thereby coherently cooling the polar molecules without affecting the internal state, a process which can be repeated if the atoms are cooled again or new cold atoms are brought in. Our cooling schemes open the possibility of extending quantum computation and simulation times in emerging hybrid tweezer arrays of polar molecules and neutral atoms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.10671 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic of cooling protocol. (a) Each hot polar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Level diagrams used for data-insensitive cooling of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Level diagram for utilizing nuclear states in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Phonon swap range for (a) NaCs and (b) LiCs when [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [24]

    Belyansky, J

    R. Belyansky, J. T. Young, P. Bienias, Z. Eldredge, A. M. Kaufman, P. Zoller, and A. V. Gorshkov, Nondestruc- tive Cooling of an Atomic Quantum Register via State- Insensitive Rydberg Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 213603 (2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [1]

    Endres, H

    M. Endres, H. Bernien, A. Keesling, H. Levine, E. R. Anschuetz, A. Krajenbrink, C. Senko, V. Vuletic, M. Greiner, and M. D. Lukin, Atom-by-atom assembly of defect-free one-dimensional cold atom arrays, Science 354, 1024 (2016)

    2016

  3. [2]

    Barredo, S

    D. Barredo, S. de L´ es´ eleuc, V. Lienhard, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, An atom-by-atom assembler of defect-free arbitrary two-dimensional atomic arrays, Science 354, 1021 (2016)

    2016

  4. [3]

    Browaeys and T

    A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms, Nat. Phys. 16, 132 (2020)

    2020

  5. [4]

    A. M. Kaufman and K.-K. Ni, Quantum science with optical tweezer arrays of ultracold atoms and molecules, Nat. Phys. 17, 1324 (2021)

    2021

  6. [5]

    Bluvstein, S

    D. Bluvstein, S. J. Evered, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li, H. Zhou, T. Manovitz, S. Ebadi, M. Cain, M. Kali- nowski, D. Hangleiter, J. P. Bonilla Ataides, N. Maskara, I. Cong, X. Gao, P. Sales Rodriguez, T. Karolyshyn, G. Semeghini, M. J. Gullans, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Logical quantum processor based on recon- figurable atom arrays, Nature (Lon...

    work page 2023

  7. [6]

    H. J. Manetsch, G. Nomura, E. Bataille, K. H. Leung, X. Lv, and M. Endres, A tweezer array with 6100 highly coherent atomic qubits, arXiv:2403.12021

    arXiv

  8. [7]

    L. R. Liu, J. D. Hood, Y. Yu, J. T. Zhang, N. R. Hutzler, T. Rosenband, and K. K. Ni, Building one molecule from a reservoir of two atoms, Science 360, 900 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 67 references
  1. [8]

    X. He, K. Wang, J. Zhuang, P. Xu, X. Gao, R. Guo, C. Sheng, M. Liu, J. Wang, J. Li, G. V. Shlyapnikov, and M. Zhan, Coherently forming a single molecule in an optical trap, Science 370, 331 (2020)

    2020

  2. [9]

    J. T. Zhang, L. R. B. Picard, W. B. Cairncross, K. Wang, Y. Yu, F. Fang, and K.-K. Ni, An optical tweezer array of ground-state polar molecules, Quantum Sci. Technol. 7, 035006 (2022)

    2022

  3. [10]

    Anderegg, L

    L. Anderegg, L. W. Cheuk, Y. Bao, S. Burchesky, W. Ketterle, K. K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, An optical tweezer array of ultracold molecules, Science 365, 1156 (2019)

    2019

  4. [11]

    Burchesky, L

    S. Burchesky, L. Anderegg, Y. Bao, S. S. Yu, E. Chae, W. Ketterle, K. K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, Rotational Co- 6 herence Times of Polar Molecules in Optical Tweezers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 123202 (2021)

    2021

  5. [12]

    Y. Bao, S. S. Yu, L. Anderegg, E. Chae, W. Ketterle, K. K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, Dipolar spin-exchange and entanglement between molecules in an optical tweezer ar- ray, Science 382, 1138 (2023)

    2023

  6. [13]

    C. M. Holland, Y. Lu, and L. W. Cheuk, On-demand entanglement of molecules in a reconfigurable optical tweezer array, Science 382, 1143 (2023)

    2023

  7. [14]

    D. K. Ruttley, A. Guttridge, S. Spence, R. C. Bird, C. R. Le Sueur, J. M. Hutson, and S. L. Cornish, Formation of Ultracold Molecules by Merging Optical Tweezers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 223401 (2023)

    2023

  8. [15]

    Guttridge, D

    A. Guttridge, D. K. Ruttley, A. C. Baldock, R. Gonz´ alez- F´ erez, H. R. Sadeghpour, C. S. Adams, and S. L. Cornish, Observation of Rydberg Blockade Due to the Charge-Dipole Interaction between an Atom and a Polar Molecule, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 013401 (2023)

    2023

  9. [16]

    A. J. Park, L. R. Picard, G. E. Patenotte, J. T. Zhang, T. Rosenband, and K. K. Ni, Extended Rotational Co- herence of Polar Molecules in an Elliptically Polarized Trap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 183401 (2023)

    2023

  10. [17]

    D. K. Ruttley, A. Guttridge, T. R. Hepworth, and S. L. Cornish, Enhanced Quantum Control of Individual Ul- tracold Molecules Using Optical Tweezer Arrays, PRX Quantum 5, 020333 (2024)

    2024

  11. [18]

    L. R. B. Picard, G. E. Patenotte, A. J. Park, S. F. Ge- bretsadkan, and K.-K. Ni, Site-Selective Preparation and Multistate Readout of Molecules in Optical Tweezers, PRX Quantum 5, 020344 (2024)

    2024

  12. [19]

    Y. Lu, S. J. Li, C. M. Holland, and L. W. Cheuk, Raman sideband cooling of molecules in an optical tweezer array, Nat. Phys. 20, 389 (2024)

    2024

  13. [20]

    Y. Bao, S. S. Yu, J. You, L. Anderegg, E. Chae, W. Ket- terle, K.-K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, Raman Sideband Cool- ing of Molecules in an Optical Tweezer Array to the 3D Motional Ground State, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031002 (2024)

    2024

  14. [21]

    L. R. B. Picard, A. J. Park, G. E. Patenotte, S. Gebret- sadkan, D. Wellnitz, A. M. Rey, and K.-K. Ni, Entangle- ment and iSW AP gate between molecular qubits, Nature (London) 637, 821 (2025)

    2025

  15. [22]

    D. K. Ruttley, T. R. Hepworth, A. Guttridge, and S. L. Cornish, Long-lived entanglement of molecules in magic- wavelength optical tweezers, Nature (London) 637, 827 (2025)

    2025

  16. [23]

    S. L. Cornish, M. R. Tarbutt, and K. R. A. Hazzard, Quantum computation and quantum simulation with ul- tracold molecules, Nat. Phys. 20, 730 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    T. A. Savard, K. M. O’Hara, and J. E. Thomas, Laser- noise-induced heating in far-off resonance optical traps, Phys. Rev. A 56, R1095 (1997)

    1997

  18. [26]

    Jaksch, J

    D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, S. L. Rolston, R. Cˆ ot´ e, and M. D. Lukin, Fast Quantum Gates for Neutral Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2208 (2000)

    2000

  19. [27]

    Saffman and T

    M. Saffman and T. G. Walker, Analysis of a quantum logic device based on dipole-dipole interactions of opti- cally trapped Rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. A 72, 022347 (2005)

    2005

  20. [28]

    Saffman, T

    M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer, Quantum information with Rydberg atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2313 (2010)

    2010

  21. [29]

    Pichler, A

    H. Pichler, A. J. Daley, and P. Zoller, Nonequilibrium dynamics of bosonic atoms in optical lattices: Decoher- ence of many-body states due to spontaneous emission, Phys. Rev. A 82, 063605 (2010)

    2010

  22. [30]

    M. D. Barrett, B. DeMarco, T. Schaetz, V. Meyer, D. Leibfried, J. Britton, J. Chiaverini, W. M. Itano, B. Jelenkovi´ c, J. D. Jost, C. Langer, T. Rosenband, and D. J. Wineland, Sympathetic cooling of 9Be+ and 24Mg+ for quantum logic, Phys. Rev. A 68, 8 (2003)

    2003

  23. [31]

    Reichenbach and I

    I. Reichenbach and I. H. Deutsch, Sideband Cooling while Preserving Coherences in the Nuclear Spin State in Group-II-like Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 123001 (2007)

    2007

  24. [32]

    Zhang and M

    C. Zhang and M. Tarbutt, Quantum Computation in a Hybrid Array of Molecules and Rydberg Atoms, PRX Quantum 3, 030340 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    K. Wang, C. P. Williams, L. R. Picard, N. Y. Yao, and K.-K. Ni, Enriching the Quantum Toolbox of Ul- tracold Molecules with Rydberg Atoms, PRX Quantum 3, 030339 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    Kuznetsova, S

    E. Kuznetsova, S. T. Rittenhouse, H. R. Sadeghpour, and S. F. Yelin, Rydberg atom mediated polar molecule inter- actions: A tool for molecular-state conditional quantum gates and individual addressability, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 17115 (2011)

    2011

  27. [35]

    B. Zhao, A. W. Glaetzle, G. Pupillo, and P. Zoller, Atomic Rydberg Reservoirs for Polar Molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 193007 (2012)

    2012

  28. [36]

    S. D. Huber and H. P. B¨ uchler, Dipole-Interaction- Mediated Laser Cooling of Polar Molecules to Ultracold Temperatures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 193006 (2012)

    2012

  29. [37]

    Kuznetsova, S

    E. Kuznetsova, S. T. Rittenhouse, H. R. Sadeghpour, and S. F. Yelin, Rydberg-atom-mediated nondestructive readout of collective rotational states in polar-molecule arrays, Phys. Rev. A 94, 032325 (2016)

    2016

  30. [38]

    Zeppenfeld, Nondestructive detection of polar molecules via Rydberg atoms, Europhys

    M. Zeppenfeld, Nondestructive detection of polar molecules via Rydberg atoms, Europhys. Lett. 118, 13002 (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    Patsch, M

    S. Patsch, M. Zeppenfeld, and C. P. Koch, Ryd- berg Atom-Enabled Spectroscopy of Polar Molecules via F¨ orster Resonance Energy Transfer, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13, 10728 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    Kuznetsova, S

    E. Kuznetsova, S. T. Rittenhouse, I. I. Beterov, M. O. Scully, S. F. Yelin, and H. R. Sadeghpour, Effective spin- spin interactions in bilayers of Rydberg atoms and polar molecules, Phys. Rev. A 98, 043609 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    Zhelyazkova and S

    V. Zhelyazkova and S. D. Hogan, Probing resonant en- ergy transfer in collisions of ammonia with Rydberg he- lium atoms by microwave spectroscopy, J. Chem. Phys. 147, 10.1063/1.5011406 (2017)

    2017 doi

  34. [42]

    Jarisch and M

    F. Jarisch and M. Zeppenfeld, State resolved investiga- tion of F¨ orster resonant energy transfer in collisions be- tween polar molecules and Rydberg atoms, New J. Phys. 20, 113044 (2018)

    2018

  35. [43]

    Gawlas and S

    K. Gawlas and S. D. Hogan, Rydberg-State-Resolved Resonant Energy Transfer in Cold Electric-Field- Controlled Intrabeam Collisions of NH3 with Rydberg He Atoms, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 83 (2020)

    2020

  36. [44]

    L. Zhu, J. Luke, R. Shaham, Y.-X. Liu, and K.-K. Ni, Probing dipolar interactions between Rydberg atoms and ultracold polar molecules, arXiv:2504.06977

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    Zhang, S

    C. Zhang, S. T. Rittenhouse, T. V. Tscherbul, H. R. Sadeghpour, and N. R. Hutzler, Sympathetic Cooling and 7 Slowing of Molecules with Rydberg Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 33001 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    See Supplemental Material for details

  39. [47]

    D. A. Fedorov, A. Derevianko, and S. A. Varganov, Ac- curate potential energy, dipole moment curves, and life- times of vibrational states of heteronuclear alkali dimers, J. Chem. Phys. 140, 184315 (2014)

    2014

  40. [48]

    Aldegunde and J

    J. Aldegunde and J. M. Hutson, Hyperfine structure of alkali-metal diatomic molecules, Phys. Rev. A 96, 042506 (2017)

    2017

  41. [49]

    Pupillo, A

    G. Pupillo, A. Micheli, M. Boninsegni, I. Lesanovsky, a nd P. Zoller, Strongly Correlated Gases of Rydberg-Dressed Atoms: Quantum and Classical Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 223002 (2010)

    2010

  42. [50]

    J. E. Johnson and S. L. Rolston, Interactions between Rydberg-dressed atoms, Phys. Rev. A 82, 033412 (2010)

    2010

  43. [51]

    Henkel, R

    N. Henkel, R. Nath, and T. Pohl, Three-Dimensional Ro- ton Excitations and Supersolid Formation in Rydberg- Excited Bose-Einstein Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 195302 (2010)

    2010

  44. [52]

    Y.-Y. Jau, A. M. Hankin, T. Keating, I. H. Deutsch, and G. W. Biedermann, Entangling atomic spins with a Rydberg-dressed spin-flip blockade, Nat. Phys. 12, 71 (2016)

    2016

  45. [53]

    Zeiher, R

    J. Zeiher, R. van Bijnen, P. Schauß, S. Hild, J.-Y. Choi, T. Pohl, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Many-body interferome- try of a Rydberg-dressed spin lattice, Nat. Phys. 12, 1095 (2016)

    2016

  46. [54]

    Zeiher, J.-y

    J. Zeiher, J.-y. Choi, A. Rubio-Abadal, T. Pohl, R. van Bijnen, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Coherent Many-Body Spin Dynamics in a Long-Range Interacting Ising Chain, Phys. Rev. X 7, 041063 (2017)

    2017

  47. [55]

    Arias, G

    A. Arias, G. Lochead, T. M. Wintermantel, S. Helmrich, and S. Whitlock, Realization of a Rydberg-Dressed Ram- sey Interferometer and Electrometer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 053601 (2019)

    2019

  48. [56]

    Borish, O

    V. Borish, O. Markovi´ c, J. A. Hines, S. V. Rajagopal, and M. Schleier-Smith, Transverse-Field Ising Dynamics in a Rydberg-Dressed Atomic Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 063601 (2020)

    2020

  49. [57]

    Guardado-Sanchez, B

    E. Guardado-Sanchez, B. M. Spar, P. Schauss, R. Belyan- sky, J. T. Young, P. Bienias, A. V. Gorshkov, T. Iadecola, and W. S. Bakr, Quench Dynamics of a Fermi Gas with Strong Nonlocal Interactions, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021036 (2021)

    2021

  50. [58]

    M. J. Martin, Y.-Y. Jau, J. Lee, A. Mitra, I. H. Deutsch, and G. W. Biedermann, A Mølmer-Sørensen Gate with Rydberg-Dressed Atoms, arXiv:2111.14677

    arXiv

  51. [59]

    J. A. Hines, S. V. Rajagopal, G. L. Moreau, M. D. Wahrman, N. A. Lewis, O. Markovi´ c, and M. Schleier- Smith, Spin Squeezing by Rydberg Dressing in an Ar- ray of Atomic Ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 063401 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    W. J. Eckner, N. Darkwah Oppong, A. Cao, A. W. Young, W. R. Milner, J. M. Robinson, J. Ye, and A. M. Kaufman, Realizing spin squeezing with Rydberg inter- actions in an optical clock, Nature (London) 621, 734 (2023)

    2023

  53. [61]

    Weckesser, K

    P. Weckesser, K. Srakaew, T. Blatz, D. Wei, D. Adler, S. Agrawal, A. Bohrdt, I. Bloch, and J. Zeiher, Realiza- tion of a Rydberg-dressed extended Bose Hubbard model, arXiv:2405.20128

    arXiv

  54. [62]

    Stecker, R

    M. Stecker, R. Nold, L. M. Steinert, J. Grimmel, D. Pet- rosyan, J. Fort´ agh, and A. G¨ unther, Controlling the Dipole Blockade and Ionization Rate of Rydberg Atoms in Strong Electric Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 103602 (2020)

    2020

  55. [63]

    E. J. Robertson, N. ˇSibali´ c, R. M. Potvliege, and M. P. Jones, ARC 3.0: An expanded Python toolbox for atomic physics calculations, Comput. Phys. Commun. 261, 107814 (2021) . Supplemental Material: Data-insensitive cooling of polar molecules wi th Rydberg atom Jeremy T. You...

    2021

  56. [64]

    and choose the symmetric superpositions |+,m N,m I1,m I2 ð for the molecular qubit. Due to the energy shifts, the hyperfine st ructure will dress these with the antisymmetric superpositions |−,m N,m ′ I1,m ′ I2 ð with coefficients proportional to ϵ, which defines our new, perturbe...

  57. [65]

    95 |δam, 0. 05|/ 2π (mT) (kHz µmα ) (kHz) [ aLR/ 2] ( µm) ( µm) ( µm) ( µm) (MHz), [ aLR/ 2]1 76S 81.0 100 3 1003 43.2 138 0.93 1.45 2.25 118 Na 6 1101 53 188 0.93 1.54 2.56 126 33 2 68S 67.6 87 3 826 111 252 0.74 1.30 2.28 119 23Na133Cs 6 457 144 364 0.74 1.40 2.64 128 54 1 7...

    1998

  58. [66]

    95 truncated at the smaller of nB, nmax

  59. [67]

    95. VIII. DC COOLING In this section, we discuss in further detail how a DC electric fi eld could in principle be utilized for cooling. In this case, the electric field induces permanent dipole moments in the atomic and molecular states, realizing a direct 13 interaction between...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.