REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 82 references
Multichannel topological Kondo models and their low-temperature conductances
T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read The paper establishes that the N-channel SO(M) topological Kondo model flows to an overscreened intermediate-coupling fixed point whose zero-temperature transconductance and leading temperature corrections are fixed exactly by boundary…
desk verdict New generic-N conductance formula for topological Kondo models, solidly cross-checked but built on a fixed-point existence assumption that is asserted, not proven. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The engine is the Kac-Moody current algebra of $SO(M)$ at level $2N$, together with the Affleck-Ludwig fusion hypothesis. The $N$ spinless channels provide $2N$ Majorana screening channels, so the conduction-electron current obeys the $SO(M)_{2N}$ Kac-Moody algebra, and the allowed representations are cut off by the inequalities of Eq. (12). The impurity spinor always satisfies this cut-off and is not trivially screened, which the paper takes as the definition of overscreening. Fusing the impurity representation with the free fixed-point primaries produces the Kondo fixed-point spectrum; the conductance is obtained by writing the channel currents in terms of singlet and symmetric-traceless densities $J^{(c)}$ and $J^{(d)}$, whose fixed-point correlation functions are fixed by the modular S-matrix ratio $S_N(M)$. The leading irrelevant operator is the first descendant of the adjoint primary, with dimension $\Delta_1$, and its selection rules determine the temperature exponent.
What would settle it
Measure or compute the two-lead transconductance of the $N=2$, $M=5$ topological Kondo device as a function of temperature: Eq. (28) with Eq. (31) pins the zero-temperature value, and Eq. (35) predicts a leading correction $T^{3/7}$. A controlled numerical solution of the lattice Hamiltonian Eqs. (1)-(2), or a transport experiment on a five-Majorana island with two leads, that instead shows a Fermi-liquid $T^2$ approach or a different zero-temperature value would falsify the fixed-point description.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The central claim is that the $N$-channel topological Kondo model, a Coulomb-blockaded island with $M$ Majorana modes coupled to $N$ spinless leads, is an overscreened Kondo model whose low-energy fixed point is described by the boundary conformal field theory of $SO(M)$ at level $2N$. At that fixed point the impurity is the spinor representation $R(S_A)$, namely $\mu_{m-1} \oplus \mu_m$ for even $M=2m$ and $\mu_m$ for odd $M=2m+1$, and the leading irrelevant boundary operator is the first descendant $\vec{J}_{-1} \cdot \vec{\phi}$ of the adjoint primary, with scaling dimension $\Delta_1 = 1 + (M-2)/(2N+M-2)$. The zero-temperature transconductance between two leads is $G_{12}/G_0 = (1 - S_N(M))/M$, Eq. (28), where $S_N(M)$ is a ratio of modular S-matrix entries of $SO(M)_{2N}$; this reproduces the $N=1$ value $(2/M)e^2/h$ and the large-$N$ result $\pi^2/(4N^2)$. The temperature correction is ruled by the fusion of the density operator $J^{(d)}$: for $N \geq 2$ it fuses to non-identity channels and the first-order correction $T^{\Delta_1-1}$ survives, whereas for $N=1$ it fuses only to the identity, forcing a second-order term $T^{2(\Delta_1-1)}$. For $M=4$ and $N=1$ the paper explicitly constructs the strong-coupling effective Hamiltonian, confirming the equivalence to the two-channel Kondo model.
Load-bearing premise
The argument assumes that an intermediate-coupling fixed point exists for every number of channels $N$ and Majorana flavors $M$ and is exactly described by the boundary conformal field theory built from $SO(M)$ at level $2N$; the paper verifies the strong-coupling side explicitly only for $N=1$ and in detail for $M=4$, with generic $N,M$ supported by large-$N$ evidence and the $M=3,4$ mappings rather than a direct proof.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- For any $M$ and $N$, the zero-temperature transconductance between two leads is exactly $G_{12}/G_0 = (1 - S_N(M))/M$, with closed trigonometric forms for $M=3,\dots,7$; the formula recovers the known $N=1$ value $(2/M)e^2/h$ and the large-$N$ limit $\pi^2/(4N^2)$.
- The leading non-Fermi-liquid temperature correction has exponent $(M-2)/(2N+M-2)$ for $N\geq 2$ and twice that for $N=1$, resolving the apparent conflict between large-$N$ and single-channel results.
- The strong-coupling fixed point is unstable for all $N$, so the intermediate-coupling fixed point is the stable low-energy phase; the explicit $M=4$, $N=1$ computation shows the strong-coupling ground states form a new spinor impurity screened by the next site, mapping to the two-channel Kondo model.
- The same machinery applied to the symplectic $Sp(2k)$ Kondo model predicts a conductance correction $T^2$ for $k=2$ and $T^{2(k+1)/(k+2)}$ for $k\geq 3$, the latter being non-Fermi liquid.
- In the large-$M$ limit the fixed-point conductance vanishes as $2/(MN)$, a result the paper notes is not accessible from perturbation theory in the Kondo coupling.
Reading between the lines
- Extension not made in the paper: the same boundary theory should determine current noise and shot noise at the topological Kondo fixed point, since those are also fixed by the boundary correlators of $J^{(d)}$.
- Testable extension: a device with $M=5$ and $N=2$, for example, should show a $T^{3/7}$ approach to the predicted zero-temperature transconductance rather than a Fermi-liquid $T^2$ tail, providing a clean experimental discriminator.
- The $N=1$ versus $N\geq 2$ exponent switch suggests a general selection rule: if the observable's density operator fuses with itself only to the vacuum, first-order corrections from the leading irrelevant operator vanish and the exponent doubles; the conclusions already note the analogous charge-Kondo $N=2$ case, and the same rule may apply to other fusion categories.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper studies the N-channel topological Kondo model with M Majorana modes, an SO(M) impurity coupled to N spinless electron channels. It argues that the strong-coupling fixed point is unstable and that the flow reaches an intermediate-coupling fixed point described by boundary conformal field theory of SO(M) at level 2N, with the impurity represented by the spinor primary R(S_A) = mu_{m-1}+mu_m for even M and mu_m for odd M. Using the Affleck-Ludwig fusion construction, the paper derives the zero-temperature transconductance G12/G0 = (1 - S_N(M))/M in Eq. (28), where S_N(M) is a ratio of modular S-matrix elements, and the leading finite-temperature correction in Eq. (35): T^{Delta_1-1} for N>=2 and T^{2(Delta_1-1)} for N=1, with Delta_1 = 1 + (M-2)/(2N+M-2). The paper closes with a comparison to the topological symplectic Kondo model.
Significance. If the underlying fixed-point assumption is correct, this is a significant result: it provides the first generic-N,M formula for the universal zero-temperature conductance of the multichannel topological Kondo model, and it explains the qualitative difference between N=1 and N>=2 temperature exponents. The derivation is genuinely parameter-free: S_N(M) is computed from the modular S-matrix rather than fitted to data, and the result passes nontrivial consistency checks, including the known N=1 values, the M=3,4 mappings to SU(2) multichannel Kondo models, and the large-N perturbative limit of Ref. [37]. The explicit SO(4) strong-coupling calculation in Appendix B is a concrete and useful check. The main weaknesses are that the existence of the intermediate fixed point for generic N,M is not fully demonstrated and that one load-bearing fusion rule is asserted rather than computed.
major comments (3)
- [Section II, final paragraph; Appendix B] The demonstration that the strong-coupling fixed point is unstable is carried out explicitly only for N=1, M=4 in Appendix B, where the effective Hamiltonian Eq. (B53) is derived. For generic N, the paper states that "the multichannel case (N>1) with more screening is also an overscreened Kondo model" without generalizing the K-particle-sector decomposition of Eqs. (8)-(9) to the 2N-channel local Hilbert space and without deriving the analog of the effective coupling lambda' ~ t^2/lambda. Because the existence of the SO(M)_{2N} intermediate fixed point is the foundation for the conductance predictions in Eqs. (28) and (35), this is a load-bearing gap. I ask the authors either to provide the strong-coupling analysis for N>1 (at least for small N,M) or to state explicitly that the intermediate fixed point is an assumption, making the predictions conditional on that hypothesis.
- [Section IV B, Eq. (36)] The fusion rule R(J^(d)) x R(J^(d)) = 0 for N=1 is asserted for general M without derivation, and this rule is the entire reason for the T^{2(Delta_1-1)} exponent in Eq. (35). For M>=5 the paper states that R(J^(d)) = 2 mu_1 in SO(M)_2, but it does not compute the Verlinde fusion 2 mu_1 x 2 mu_1 nor show that 2 mu_1 is a simple current with quantum dimension 1 whose square is the vacuum. A direct modular S-matrix calculation for M=5,6,7 or a reference establishing this fusion outcome is needed; without it, the N=1 piecewise exponent is not supported.
- [Section III A, around Eq. (12)] The paper defines overscreening as satisfying the representation cut-off Eq. (12) while not belonging to "trivial screening", where trivial screening is characterized only verbally as giving the free-fermion spectrum after fusion with conduction electrons. The paper asserts that R(S_A) satisfies this condition for all N>=1, but no calculation is shown that fusion with the electron representation actually produces a non-free spectrum for generic M. This is less central than the two issues above, but since the paper claims to verify the existence of the intermediate fixed point via this overscreening argument, a short explicit check or a citation would make the argument complete.
minor comments (5)
- [Section II, Eq. (3)] The definition J^A = -i(gamma_{alpha,R} gamma_{beta,R} + gamma_{alpha,I} gamma_{beta,I})/2 omits the channel index n on J^A, even though the Hamiltonian in Eq. (2) sums over channels; adding the index would prevent ambiguity in the subsequent overscreening argument.
- [Appendix B 1] There is a typo: "It is knowm that SO(4) ~ SU(2) x SU(2)" should read "known".
- [Appendix D 7] There is a typo: "becayse" should read "because" in the sentence about the leading irrelevant operator.
- [Section VI, Conclusions] The phrase "a first order correction exists for N>=3 but not for N=2" uses "exits" instead of "exists".
- [Section IV A, Eq. (34)] The printed formula for the SU(2)_k modular S-matrix has a typographical issue in the prefactor, which should read sqrt(2/(k+2)); as printed, "r 2 k+2" is hard to parse.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: the conductance formulas are computed from modular S-matrix data with no fitted parameters, and the central results are cross-checked against external benchmarks rather than built from self-citations.
full rationale
The derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular. The zero-temperature conductance, Eq. (28), is expressed in terms of S_N(M) defined in Eq. (25) from modular S-matrix elements of SO(M)_{2N}; no conductance data are fitted, and S_N(M) is not tuned to match any target. The finite-temperature exponent, Eq. (35), follows from the fusion rule in Eq. (36) for the operator J^(d), which is a representation-theoretic computation, and the piecewise N=1 versus N>=2 behavior is independently anchored by known results. The large-N limit of the new formula is compared with the authors' previous perturbative result in Ref. [37]; this is a consistency check rather than an input, and the formula is additionally validated externally by the N=1 topological Kondo conductance and by the mappings of SO(3) and SO(4) to SU(2) multichannel Kondo models. The main unsecured premise is that the microscopic RG flow lands on the SO(M)_{2N} intermediate-coupling fixed point with impurity representation R(S_A) for generic N and M. Section II establishes strong-coupling instability, and the M=4 effective Hamiltonian is derived explicitly, but the general existence of the fixed point is asserted rather than proven, and the Introduction itself states that it has not been fully demonstrated generally. This is a correctness or assumption risk, not circularity: no equation reduces the predicted conductance to the assumed fixed point by construction, and the conductance calculation would be a genuine prediction if the fixed-point hypothesis is granted. Self-citations appear only as background or as post-hoc consistency checks, not as the load-bearing justification for the central formulas.
Assumptions & free parameters
assumptions (6)
- domain assumption The topological Kondo model is described by H0 + HMCTK with M Majorana modes on a Coulomb-blockaded island and N spinless leads with isotropic Kondo coupling lambda.
- domain assumption The intermediate-coupling fixed point exists for all N and M and is described by boundary conformal field theory of SO(M) at level 2N.
- domain assumption Affleck-Ludwig fusion hypothesis: Kondo fixed-point spectrum and boundary operators are obtained by fusing free fixed-point primaries with the impurity representation.
- standard math Kac-Moody algebra SO(M) at level 2N with Sugawara Hamiltonian and modular S-matrix or Verlinde fusion rules.
- standard math Representation theory of SO(M): Dynkin labels, Casimir invariants, and the decomposition R(S_A) tensor R(J^{A,K}) in Appendix A.
- domain assumption The leading irrelevant operator at the fixed point is the first descendant of the adjoint primary, J_{-1} dot phi, with scaling dimension 1 + Delta0.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Multichannel topological Kondo models and their low-temperature conductances." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/R3HW7PCY
@misc{pith2026250711682,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Multichannel topological Kondo models and their low-temperature conductances},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/R3HW7PCY}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.11682}
}
abstract
In the multichannel Kondo effect, overscreening of a magnetic impurity by conduction electrons leads to a frustrated exotic ground state. It has been proposed that multichannel topological Kondo (MCTK) model involving topological Cooper pair boxes with $M$ Majorana modes [SO($M$) "spin"] and $N$ spinless electron channels exhibits an exotic intermediate coupling fixed point. This intermediate fixed point has been analyzed through large-$N$ perturbative calculations, which gives a zero-temperature conductance decaying as $1/N^2$ in the large-$N$ limit. However, the conductance at this intermediate fixed point has not been calculated for generic $N$. Using representation theory, we verify the existence of this intermediate-coupling fixed point and find the strong-coupling effective Hamiltonian for the case $M=4$. Using conformal field theory techniques for SO($M$), we generalize the notion of overscreening and conclude that the MCTK model is an overscreened Kondo model. We find the fixed-point finite-size energy spectrum and the leading irrelevant operator (LIO). We express the fixed-point conductance in terms of the modular S-matrix of SO($M$) for general $N$, confirming the previous large-$N$ result. We describe the finite-temperature corrections to the conductance by the LIO and find that they are qualitatively different for the cases $N=1$ and $N\geq2$ due to the different fusion outcomes with the current operator. We also compare the multichannel topological Kondo model to the topological symplectic Kondo model.
Figures
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[37]
G. Li, Y . Oreg, and J. I. V ¨ayrynen, Multichannel topological kondo effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 066302 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[1]
Kondo, Resistance minimum in dilute magnetic alloys, Progress of theoretical physics 32, 37 (1964)
J. Kondo, Resistance minimum in dilute magnetic alloys, Progress of theoretical physics 32, 37 (1964)
1964
-
[2]
and Blandin, A., Kondo effect in real metals, J
Nozi `eres, Ph. and Blandin, A., Kondo effect in real metals, J. Phys. France 41, 193 (1980)
1980
-
[3]
Goldhaber-Gordon, H
D. Goldhaber-Gordon, H. Shtrikman, D. Mahalu, D. Abusch- Magder, U. Meirav, and M. A. Kastner, Kondo effect in a single- electron transistor, Nature 391, 156 (1998)
1998
-
[4]
Pustilnik and L
M. Pustilnik and L. Glazman, Kondo effect in quantum dots, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 16, R513 (2004)
2004
-
[5]
R. M. Potok, I. G. Rau, H. Shtrikman, Y . Oreg, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Observation of the two-channel Kondo effect, Nature (London) 446, 167 (2007)
work page 2007
-
[6]
A. J. Keller, L. Peeters, C. P. Moca, I. Weymann, D. Mahalu, V . Umansky, G. Zar´and, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Universal Fermi liquid crossover and quantum criticality in a mesoscopic system, Nature (London) 526, 237 (2015)
work page 2015
-
[7]
Z. Iftikhar, S. Jezouin, A. Anthore, U. Gennser, F. D. Parmen- tier, A. Cavanna, and F. Pierre, Two-channel Kondo effect and renormalization flow with macroscopic quantum charge states, Nature (London) 526, 233 (2015)
work page 2015
Show all 82 references
-
[8]
Iftikhar, A
Z. Iftikhar, A. Anthore, A. K. Mitchell, F. D. Parmentier, U. Gennser, A. Ouerghi, A. Cavanna, C. Mora, P. Simon, and F. Pierre, Tunable quantum criticality and super-ballistic trans- port in a “charge” Kondo circuit, Science 360, 1315 (2018). 10
2018
-
[9]
Pouse, L
W. Pouse, L. Peeters, C. L. Hsueh, U. Gennser, A. Cavanna, M. A. Kastner, A. K. Mitchell, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Quantum simulation of an exotic quantum critical point in a two-site charge Kondo circuit, Nature Physics 19, 492 (2023)
2023
-
[10]
Affleck, Conformal field theory approach to the kondo effect, Acta Phys
I. Affleck, Conformal field theory approach to the kondo effect, Acta Phys. Polon. B26, 1869 (1995)
1995
-
[11]
P. L. S. Lopes, I. Affleck, and E. Sela, Anyons in multichannel kondo systems, Phys. Rev. B 101, 085141 (2020)
2020
-
[12]
Komijani, Isolating kondo anyons for topological quantum computation, Phys
Y . Komijani, Isolating kondo anyons for topological quantum computation, Phys. Rev. B 101, 235131 (2020)
2020
-
[13]
Gabay, C
D. Gabay, C. Han, P. L. S. Lopes, I. Affleck, and E. Sela, Multi- impurity chiral kondo model: Correlation functions and anyon fusion rules, Phys. Rev. B 105, 035151 (2022)
2022
-
[14]
Lotem, E
M. Lotem, E. Sela, and M. Goldstein, Manipulating non-abelian anyons in a chiral multichannel kondo model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 227703 (2022)
2022
-
[15]
T. Ren, E. J. K ¨onig, and A. M. Tsvelik, Topological quantum computation on a chiral kondo chain, Phys. Rev. B109, 075145 (2024)
2024
-
[16]
J. Gan, N. Andrei, and P. Coleman, Perturbative approach to the non-Fermi-liquid fixed point of the overscreened Kondo prob- lem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 686 (1993)
1993
-
[17]
Andrei and C
N. Andrei and C. Destri, Solution of the multichannel kondo problem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 364 (1984)
1984
-
[18]
Tsvelick and P
A. Tsvelick and P. Wiegmann, Exact solution of the multichan- nel kondo problem, scaling, and integrability, Journal of Statis- tical Physics 38, 125 (1985)
1985
-
[19]
V . J. Emery and S. Kivelson, Mapping of the two-channel kondo problem to a resonant-level model, Phys. Rev. B 46, 10812 (1992)
1992
-
[20]
A. M. Sengupta and A. Georges, Emery-Kivelson solution of the two-channel Kondo problem, Phys. Rev. B 49, 10020 (1994), arXiv:cond-mat/9312016 [cond-mat]
1994 arXiv
-
[21]
Coleman, L
P. Coleman, L. B. Ioffe, and A. M. Tsvelik, Simple formulation of the two-channel kondo model, Physical Review B 52, 6611 (1995)
1995
-
[22]
A. V . Rozhkov, Impurity entropy for the two-channel kondo model, International Journal of Modern Physics B 12, 3457 (1998)
1998
-
[23]
Hartman, C
N. Hartman, C. Olsen, S. L ¨uscher, M. Samani, S. Fallahi, G. C. Gardner, M. Manfra, and J. Folk, Direct entropy mea- surement in a mesoscopic quantum system, Nature Physics 14, 1083–1086 (2018)
2018
-
[24]
Child, O
T. Child, O. Sheekey, S. L ¨uscher, S. Fallahi, G. C. Gardner, M. Manfra, A. Mitchell, E. Sela, Y . Kleeorin, Y . Meir, and J. Folk, Entropy measurement of a strongly coupled quantum dot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 227702 (2022)
2022
-
[25]
C. Han, Z. Iftikhar, Y . Kleeorin, A. Anthore, F. Pierre, Y . Meir, A. K. Mitchell, and E. Sela, Fractional entropy of multichannel kondo systems from conductance-charge relations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 146803 (2022)
2022
-
[26]
ground- state degeneracy
I. Affleck and A. W. W. Ludwig, Universal noninteger “ground- state degeneracy” in critical quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 161 (1991)
1991
-
[27]
Affleck, A current algebra approach to the kondo effect, Nu- clear Physics B 336, 517 (1990)
I. Affleck, A current algebra approach to the kondo effect, Nu- clear Physics B 336, 517 (1990)
1990
-
[28]
Affleck and A
I. Affleck and A. W. Ludwig, The kondo effect, conformal field theory and fusion rules, Nuclear Physics B 352, 849 (1991)
1991
-
[29]
Affleck and A
I. Affleck and A. W. Ludwig, Critical theory of overscreened kondo fixed points, Nuclear Physics B 360, 641 (1991)
1991
-
[30]
Affleck and A
I. Affleck and A. W. W. Ludwig, Exact conformal-field- theory results on the multichannel kondo effect: Single-fermion green’s function, self-energy, and resistivity, Phys. Rev. B 48, 7297 (1993)
1993
-
[31]
A. W. Ludwig and I. Affleck, Exact conformal-field-theory re- sults on the multi-channel kondo effect: Asymptotic three- dimensional space-and time-dependent multi-point and many- particle green’s functions, Nuclear Physics B 428, 545 (1994)
1994
-
[32]
A. W. W. Ludwig and I. Affleck, Exact, asymptotic, three- dimensional, space- and time-dependent, green’s functions in the multichannel kondo effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 3160 (1991)
1991
-
[33]
Parcollet, A
O. Parcollet, A. Georges, G. Kotliar, and A. Sengupta, Over- screened multichannel SU(N ) Kondo model: Large- N solu- tion and conformal field theory, Phys. Rev. B58, 3794 (1998)
1998
-
[35]
B ´eri and N
B. B ´eri and N. R. Cooper, Topological kondo effect with majo- rana fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 156803 (2012)
2012
-
[36]
B ´eri, Majorana-klein hybridization in topological supercon- ductor junctions, Phys
B. B ´eri, Majorana-klein hybridization in topological supercon- ductor junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 216803 (2013)
2013
-
[38]
Bollmann, J
S. Bollmann, J. I. V ¨ayrynen, and E. J. K ¨onig, Topological kondo effect with spinful majorana fermions, Phys. Rev. B110, 035136 (2024)
2024
-
[39]
G. Li, E. J. K ¨onig, and J. I. V ¨ayrynen, Topological symplectic kondo effect, Phys. Rev. B107, L201401 (2023)
2023
-
[40]
E. J. K ¨onig and A. M. Tsvelik, Exact solution of the topologi- cal symplectic kondo problem, Annals of Physics 456, 169231 (2023)
2023
-
[42]
J. I. V ¨ayrynen, A. E. Feiguin, and R. M. Lutchyn, Signatures of topological ground state degeneracy in majorana islands, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 043228 (2020)
2020
-
[43]
qiang Bao and F
Z. qiang Bao and F. Zhang, Quantum hall charge kondo criti- cality (2017), arXiv:1708.09139 [cond-mat.str-el]
2017 arXiv
-
[44]
A. W. Ludwig, Field theory approach to critical quantum impu- rity problems and applications to the multi-channel kondo ef- fect, International Journal of Modern Physics B 8, 347 (1994)
1994
-
[45]
Lotem, S
M. Lotem, S. Sankar, T. Ren, M. Goldstein, E. J. K ¨onig, A. Weichselbaum, E. Sela, and A. M. Tsvelik, Relevance of anisotropy in the kondo effect: Lessons from the symplectic case, Phys. Rev. B 110, 235122 (2024)
2024
-
[46]
Tsvelik, Topological kondo effect in star junctions of ising magnetic chains: exact solution, New Journal of Physics 16, 033003 (2014)
A. Tsvelik, Topological kondo effect in star junctions of ising magnetic chains: exact solution, New Journal of Physics 16, 033003 (2014)
2014
-
[47]
A. K. Mitchell, A. Liberman, E. Sela, and I. Affleck, SO(5) Non-Fermi Liquid in a Coulomb Box Device, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 147702 (2021)
2021
-
[48]
Liberman, A
A. Liberman, A. K. Mitchell, I. Affleck, and E. Sela, SO(5) critical point in a spin-flavor Kondo device: Bosonization and refermionization solution, Phys. Rev. B 103, 195131 (2021)
2021
-
[49]
Georgi, Lie algebras in particle physics: from isospin to uni- fied theories (Taylor & Francis, 2000)
H. Georgi, Lie algebras in particle physics: from isospin to uni- fied theories (Taylor & Francis, 2000)
2000
-
[50]
Ma, Group theory for physicists (World Scientific, 2007)
Z.-Q. Ma, Group theory for physicists (World Scientific, 2007)
2007
-
[51]
Zee, Group theory in a nutshell for physicists , V ol
A. Zee, Group theory in a nutshell for physicists , V ol. 17 (Princeton University Press, 2016)
2016
-
[52]
Feger, T
R. Feger, T. W. Kephart, and R. J. Saskowski, Lieart 2.0 – a mathematica application for lie algebras and representation the- ory, Computer Physics Communications 257, 107490 (2020)
2020
-
[53]
Fabrizio and A
M. Fabrizio and A. O. Gogolin, Toulouse limit for the over- screened four-channel kondo problem, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17732 (1994)
1994
-
[54]
A. M. Sengupta and Y . B. Kim, Overscreened single-channel kondo problem, Phys. Rev. B 54, 14918 (1996). 11
1996
-
[55]
Altland, B
A. Altland, B. B ´eri, R. Egger, and A. M. Tsvelik, Multichannel kondo impurity dynamics in a majorana device, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 076401 (2014)
2014
-
[56]
Verlinde, Fusion rules and modular transformations in 2d conformal field theory, Nuclear Physics B 300, 360 (1988)
E. Verlinde, Fusion rules and modular transformations in 2d conformal field theory, Nuclear Physics B 300, 360 (1988)
1988
-
[57]
Hung, Y .-S
L.-Y . Hung, Y .-S. Wu, and Y . Zhou, Linking entanglement and discrete anomaly, Journal of High Energy Physics 2018, 8 (2018)
2018
-
[58]
Kong and Z.-H
L. Kong and Z.-H. Zhang, An invitation to topological orders and category theory (2022), arXiv:2205.05565 [cond-mat.str- el]
2022 arXiv
-
[59]
Kimura, Abcd of kondo effect, Journal of the Physical Soci- ety of Japan 90, 024708 (2021)
T. Kimura, Abcd of kondo effect, Journal of the Physical Soci- ety of Japan 90, 024708 (2021)
2021
-
[60]
Altland, B
A. Altland, B. B ´eri, R. Egger, and A. M. Tsvelik, Bethe ansatz solution of the topological kondo model, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 47, 265001 (2014)
2014
-
[61]
A. O. Gogolin, A. A. Nersesyan, and A. M. Tsvelik, Bosoniza- tion and strongly correlated systems (Cambridge university press, 2004)
2004
-
[62]
A. W. W. LUDWIG, Methods of conformal field theory in condensed matter physics, in Low-Dimensional Quantum Field Theories for Condensed Matter Physicists (1995) pp. 389–455
1995
-
[63]
Francesco, P
P. Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. S´en´echal, Conformal field the- ory (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)
2012
-
[64]
Michaeli, L
K. Michaeli, L. A. Landau, E. Sela, and L. Fu, Electron telepor- tation and statistical transmutation in multiterminal majorana islands, Phys. Rev. B 96, 205403 (2017)
2017
-
[65]
Rahmani, C.-Y
A. Rahmani, C.-Y . Hou, A. Feiguin, C. Chamon, and I. Affleck, How to find conductance tensors of quantum multiwire junc- tions through static calculations: Application to an interacting y junction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 226803 (2010)
2010
-
[66]
Rahmani, C.-Y
A. Rahmani, C.-Y . Hou, A. Feiguin, M. Oshikawa, C. Cha- mon, and I. Affleck, General method for calculating the uni- versal conductance of strongly correlated junctions of multiple quantum wires, Phys. Rev. B 85, 045120 (2012)
2012
-
[67]
[39] for similar calcula- tions in full detail
See the supplementary material of Ref. [39] for similar calcula- tions in full detail
-
[68]
M. R. Galpin, A. K. Mitchell, J. Temaismithi, D. E. Logan, B. B ´eri, and N. R. Cooper, Conductance fingerprint of majo- rana fermions in the topological kondo effect, Phys. Rev. B 89, 045143 (2014)
2014
-
[69]
Herviou, K
L. Herviou, K. Le Hur, and C. Mora, Many-terminal majorana island: From topological to multichannel kondo model, Phys. Rev. B 94, 235102 (2016)
2016
-
[70]
Kimura and S
T. Kimura and S. Ozaki, Fermi/non-fermi mixing in su(n) kondo effect, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 86, 084703 (2017)
2017
-
[71]
Oshikawa, C
M. Oshikawa, C. Chamon, and I. Affleck, Junctions of three quantum wires, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2006, P02008 (2006). Appendix A: SO(2m) Lie algebra and spinor representation In this section, we introduce the basics of the SO(2m) Lie algebra an...
2006
-
[72]
In our case, they can be Majorana bilinears−iγαγβ/2 with α < β
SO (2m) Lie algebra The group SO(2m) is generated by m(2m−1) generators. In our case, they can be Majorana bilinears−iγαγβ/2 with α < β. The rank of so(2m) Lie algebra is m, which means that we havem Cartan generators. The corresponding Cartan generators and the 2m(m − 1) root...
-
[73]
, γ2m−1 = I ⊗ · · · ⊗I ⊗ σ1, γ2m = I ⊗ · · · ⊗I ⊗ σ2
Representation of SA, J A and decomposition of R(SA) ⊗ R(J A) The spinor representations SA using Majorana operators can be further written in terms of Pauli matrices σi, i= 1, 2, 3: γ1 = σ1 ⊗ σ3 ⊗ · · · ⊗σ3, γ2 = σ2 ⊗ σ3 ⊗ · · · ⊗σ3, γ3 = I ⊗ σ1 ⊗ σ3 ⊗ · · · ⊗σ3, γ4 = I ⊗ σ2 ...
-
[74]
(B1) 13 The Casimir invariant is thus c(a1µ1 + a2µ2) = 1 2 a1(a2 + 2) + 1 2 a1(a2 + 2)
Ground states of the SO (4) topological Kondo interaction The simple roots and fundamental weights of SO(4) are [49, 51] α1 = (1, −1), α2 = (1, 1); µ1 = (1/2, −1/2), µ2 = (1/2, 1/2). (B1) 13 The Casimir invariant is thus c(a1µ1 + a2µ2) = 1 2 a1(a2 + 2) + 1 2 a1(a2 + 2). (B2) T...
-
[75]
(B2), which givesP A(RA)2 = c Idim×dim
Representations and strong coupling solutions The Casimir invariantc(a1, a2) for a representation of generatorsRA labeled by a1µ1+a2µ2 is given by Eq. (B2), which givesP A(RA)2 = c Idim×dim. The K = 0, 4-particle sector contain only one state |0⟩ or |full⟩ = ψ† 1ψ† 2ψ† 3ψ† 4|0...
-
[76]
At 1-particle sector, the general form for the states are |K = 1, α⟩ = X ij (tα)ij|i⟩ ⊗ψ† j |0⟩, i, j= 1,
Eigenstates Next, we define the eigenstates of HK in 1, 2, 3-particle sector. At 1-particle sector, the general form for the states are |K = 1, α⟩ = X ij (tα)ij|i⟩ ⊗ψ† j |0⟩, i, j= 1, . . . ,4; α = 1, . . .16. (B14) Based on the above decomposition, we define that (2HK/λ)|K = ...
-
[77]
4 labels the flavor
Perturbative inclusion of the leads The lead fermion is ψs,i where s labels the site and i = 1, . . .4 labels the flavor. The nearest site to the impurity is at s = 1 and we ignored this s = 1 on the above nearest lead fermion. But now we include the hopping energy between the...
-
[78]
(C29)] is [ eJ A p , eJ B p′ ] = i X C f ABC eJ C p+p′ + 2 pδABδp,−p′ (D1) where A, B∈ 12, 13, 14, 23, 24, 34 and we can define A, B= 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 for simplicity
The representation cut off of SO (4)2 The Kac-Moody algebra for SO(4)2 [see Eq. (C29)] is [ eJ A p , eJ B p′ ] = i X C f ABC eJ C p+p′ + 2 pδABδp,−p′ (D1) where A, B∈ 12, 13, 14, 23, 24, 34 and we can define A, B= 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 for simplicity. This gives f 1BC = 0 ...
-
[79]
The m(m − 1) positive roots are ei ± ej i < j= 1, ..., mwhere ei = (0, ..,1, ..,0) which has 1 at the ith position and 0 elsewhere
The representation cut off for SO (2m)k For SO(2m)k, the two fundamental spinor representations areµm−1 and µm. The m(m − 1) positive roots are ei ± ej i < j= 1, ..., mwhere ei = (0, ..,1, ..,0) which has 1 at the ith position and 0 elsewhere. The simple roots are ei − ei+1, i...
-
[80]
The m2 positive roots are ei ± ej and ej with i < j= 1, ..., m
The representation cut off for SO (2m + 1)k For SO(2m + 1)k, the only fundamental spinor representation is ξm. The m2 positive roots are ei ± ej and ej with i < j= 1, ..., m. The simple roots are ei − ei+1, i= 1, m− 1 and em. This gives the requirements for ℓs: ℓi ± ℓj ≤ k and...
-
[81]
dimensions
The fusion rule of SO (4)2 According to the above cut off (see Sec. D 1), the allowed representations for SO(4)2 are spinor : µ1, µ2, 2µ1 + µ2, µ1 + 2µ2; (D54) vector : 0, µ1 + µ2, 2µ1, 2µ2, 2µ1 + 2µ2. (D55) Their fusion rules are µ1 ⊗ µ1 = 2µ1 ⊕ 0; µ1 ⊗ µ2 = µ1 + µ2; (D56) µ1...
-
[82]
Energies of SO (4)2 Following Ludwig’s lecture notes [44, 62] and Ref. [34], we get the Hamiltonian H0 = HSO(4)2 + HSO(2)4 (D86) = πvF l +∞X p=−∞ n 1 2 + h∨[SO(4)] : J a −pJ a p : + 1 4 + h∨[SO(2)] : J A −pJ A p : o (D87) = πvF l +∞X p=−∞ n 1 2 + 2 : J a −pJ a p : + 1 4 + 0 : ...
-
[83]
We consider the single fusion of the impurityµ1 (µ2 is similar) with the above primary states
Single fusion with the impurity for SO(4) 2 The representation for the impurity is µ1 ⊕ µ2. We consider the single fusion of the impurityµ1 (µ2 is similar) with the above primary states. The results are listed in Table VII. 24 a1 a2 Q mod4 l E − E(0) /πvF n 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1/2...
-
[84]
Double fusion with the impurity for SO(4) 2 The representation for the impurity is µ1 ⊕ µ2. We consider the double fusion of the impurity with the above primary states shown in Table VI and allow the cross terms like µ1,2 from the first fusion with the impurity µ1 ⊕ µ2 and µ2,...
Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.