Ultra-strong Quantum Squeezing Mediated by Plasma Waves

Kenan Qu; Nathaniel J. Fisch

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Ultra-strong Quantum Squeezing Mediated by Plasma Waves

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Fully ionized plasma can mediate ultra-strong two-mode squeezing of light via stimulated Raman scattering, with predicted 20–40 dB noise reduction.

desk verdict Plasma SRS is a genuinely new route to phonon-mediated two-mode squeezing, but Eq. (9)'s thermal-noise term is off by a factor of two, making the headline numbers ~3 dB too optimistic. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.12288 v1 pith:QOP6EARL submitted 2025-07-16 physics.plasm-ph quant-ph

Kenan Qu , Nathaniel J. Fisch This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.plasm-phquant-ph

keywords quantumsqueezingplasmawavesstimulatedRamanscatteringtwo-modesqueezedstatesBogoliubovtransformationnoiseLangmuirphotonpairs

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a fully ionized plasma can mediate ultra-strong quantum squeezing of light through stimulated Raman scattering, a process that is not available in solid-state media because of damage thresholds. Two pump lasers whose frequency difference matches twice the plasma frequency drive Stokes and anti-Stokes scattering off plasma waves, producing quantum-correlated photon pairs whose joint quadrature variance falls as (n_th + 1/2)$e^{{-2r}}$. Since the plasma wave thermal noise is correlated between the two output channels, it can be removed by interference, so squeezing persists even with large thermal phonon numbers. The authors show that plasma wave damping, rather than spoiling the effect, makes the squeezing approach a stable floor, and they estimate 20 dB squeezing from a 1 cm plasma at 1 eV, and 40 dB from a 2.5 cm channel. The result matters because it would extend practical squeezing to intensities and photon numbers orders of magnitude beyond solid-state sources, with a favorable scaling toward X-ray wavelengths.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is phonon-mediated four-wave mixing, in which two copropagating pump lasers with frequency difference 2ω_p drive two stimulated Raman scattering pathways: a Stokes process that creates a plasma phonon together with a lower-frequency photon, and an anti-Stokes process that absorbs a phonon while producing a higher-frequency photon. The two pathways are coherently combined so that the plasma phonon's quantum state is transferred to the optical fields, generating a two-mode squeezed state. The analysis is carried out with a Bogoliubov transformation into hybrid modes b3 = a3 $\cosh$ r + a4^† $\sinh$ r and b4 = a4 $\cosh$ r + a3^† $\sinh$ r, under which each plasma phonon mode couples to only one hybrid mode; this diagonalization reveals the noise-isolating structure that survives thermal excitation. The load-bearing identity is Eq. (9), derived from quantum Langevin equations with a Markovian reservoir for the damped phonons, giving the covariance and the squeezing condition (2 n_th + 1) < $e^{{2r}}$.

What would settle it

Measure the joint quadrature variance of the two output modes in a plasma with controlled density, temperature, and pump ratio, and compare the asymptotic value to (n_th + 1/2)$e^{{-2r}}$; if the measured floor is higher, or if increasing Landau damping degrades rather than stabilizes the squeezing, the central claim fails. A kinetic-theory derivation of the interaction Hamiltonian that yields additional coupling terms would also refute the model.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result is Eq. (9): the joint quadrature variance of the two output optical modes evolves as ⟨$X_a^{2}$⟩ = M + (1 - M)(n_th + 1/2)$e^{{-2r}}$, where M = $e^{{-κt}}$(G/Δ)^2 $cos^{2}$(Δt - φ), κ is the Landau damping rate of the plasma wave, and r = arctanh(|α1/α2|) is set by the ratio of the two pump amplitudes. In the asymptotic limit t → ∞, M → 0, and ⟨$X_a^{2}$⟩ → (n_th + 1/2)$e^{{-2r}}$, which is below the vacuum level of 1 whenever (2 n_th + 1) < $e^{{2r}}$. Because r grows arbitrarily large as the pump amplitudes approach equality, the achievable squeezing is in principle unbounded, and the authors compute 20 dB for a 1 cm plasma at 1 eV and 40 dB for a 2.5 cm channel, with average photon numbers of $10^{3}$–$10^{6}$ per mode. The paper also claims that finite plasma wave damping is beneficial: it damps the oscillation in the squeezing magnitude and produces a stable asymptotic value rather than degrading it.

Load-bearing premise

The result hinges on the assumed interaction Hamiltonian (2) with two independent, equally coupled, Markovian-damped phonon modes and undepleted classical pumps; if the actual plasma coupling contains extra terms, correlated phonon noise, or significant pump depletion, the predicted squeezing formula will not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A 1 cm, 1 eV plasma driven by ~10^16 W/cm^2 two-color pumps should yield 20 dB of two-mode squeezing, about four times the best single-pass solid-state result.
Lengthening the plasma to 2.5 cm in a channel raises the predicted squeezing to 40 dB with ~10^6 photons per output mode.
Because plasma frequency is far above phonon frequencies in solids, even a 10 eV plasma has a lower thermal phonon number than a room-temperature crystal, so thermal noise is not a barrier.
Combining the two outputs on a balanced beam splitter converts the two-mode squeezed state into a single-mode squeezed state suitable for interferometry and strong-field experiments.
The scheme scales favorably to short wavelengths: at 1 nm and density 10^21 cm^-3, 40 dB squeezing requires pump amplitudes three orders of magnitude smaller than at optical wavelengths.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If Eq. (9) is confirmed, the asymptotic squeezing is set only by n_th and r, so longer plasma channels with nearly balanced pumps could in principle push squeezing beyond 40 dB, limited by pump depletion and other effects outside the model.
The damping-stabilized regime suggests a reservoir-engineering picture in which Landau damping cools the Bogoliubov modes; this could be extended to prepare other continuous-variable states, such as Schrödinger-cat-like superpositions, in plasma.
A natural check of the two-mode structure is to measure the cross-correlation of the two output channels: the model predicts their noise is quantum-correlated even when each individual channel is noisy, a signature that distinguishes this mechanism from independent thermal emission.
The same phonon-mediation idea might be applied to other nonlinear plasma processes, but with ion-acoustic phonons the much lower frequency would raise thermal phonon numbers and likely erase the advantage seen here.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: the paper is worth reading, but the central asymptotic formula is wrong by a factor of two, and the examples lean on it. The mechanism is still sound.

What's new: they map the two-tone optomechanical phonon-mediated squeezing scheme onto two-pump stimulated Raman scattering in a fully ionized plasma. That choice kills two birds: Langmuir waves sit at tens to hundreds of THz, so the thermal phonon number is far lower than in a crystal at room temperature, and the plasma has no ionization ceiling. The X-ray scaling (g ∝ sqrt(ω_p^3/ω_3)) is a genuine advantage that solid-state schemes can't reach. The Bogoliubov-mode decomposition is the right tool and the zero-damping argument in the text is clean.

Where it slips: Eq. (9) states ⟨X_a^2⟩ = M + (1−M)(n_th + 1/2)e^{−2r}, but the text's own zero-damping result is (2n_th + 1)e^{−2r}. The Langevin steady state gives the latter: each Bogoliubov mode ends with variance 2n_th+1, so the joint quadrature variance is 2n_th+1. The factor-of-two error makes the quoted 40 dB example about 39 dB, and the 20 dB example about 17 dB (or, using r=4 and n_th=10, the correct formula gives 21.5 dB, so the 'near 20' is roughly right, but Eq. (9) gives 24.5—either way, the printed equation is not what the examples use). The stress-test note is correct; this is a real internal inconsistency, not a cosmetic issue.

Two smaller things: the '~10^18 photons' for r=7, n_th=100 is off by about ten orders—Eq. (10) gives ~6×10^7. And the Model section says the pump frequency difference equals ω_p, while the abstract and experimental section correctly say 2ω_p. Both are fixable with a pen.

The Hamiltonian (2) is asserted, not derived; the normalization is from the authors' previous work. For a Letter that's tolerable if the derivation is in ref [39], but a referee should ask them to state that and show enough of the step to check the coupling rate.

Bottom line: the core idea—plasma SRS as a high-FOM realization of phonon-mediated squeezing—is new, the parameter regime is plausible, and the errors are repairable. A serious referee should see it. I'd send it out, with the Eq. (9) fix as a condition.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a scheme for generating two-mode squeezed light via stimulated Raman scattering in fully ionized plasma. Two copropagating pump beams with frequency separation 2ωp drive Stokes and anti-Stokes processes mediated by Langmuir waves. The authors introduce an interaction Hamiltonian (Eq. 2), apply a Bogoliubov transformation (Eq. 3), and solve quantum Langevin equations that include plasma-wave damping. They derive formulas for the joint-quadrature covariance (Eq. 9) and the output photon number (Eq. 10), and give concrete parameters yielding 20 dB and 40 dB squeezing. The central claim is that plasma waves can mediate ultra-strong, thermally robust squeezing at pump intensities inaccessible to conventional solids.

Significance. If the results are correct after revision, this paper offers a conceptually new platform for ultra-strong squeezing: SRS-mediated four-wave mixing in plasma, with a first-order nonlinearity and no material damage threshold. The analytic model is transparent, the experimental parameters are concrete and falsifiable, and the claimed robustness to thermal phonons (squeezing even when n_th≈100) is striking. The paper also correctly notes that the high Langmuir-wave frequency gives a low thermal occupation compared with phonons in solids. However, the current version contains an explicit algebraic error in Eq. (9), an underived central Hamiltonian, and a numerical inconsistency in the photon-number claim. These issues must be resolved before the quantitative claims can be accepted.

major comments (3)

[Model and two-mode squeezing, Eq. (9)] The asymptotic term in Eq. (9) should be (2 n_th + 1)e^{-2r}, not (n_th + 1/2)e^{-2r}. From the Bogoliubov transformation (3), X_a = e^{-r} X_b with X_b = (b3 + b3^† + b4 + b4^†)/√2. In the damped steady state each b-mode is a harmonic oscillator thermalized to occupation n_th; a single quadrature (b + b^†)/√2 has variance n_th + 1/2, so X_b, being the sum of two independent such quadratures, has variance 2 n_th + 1. Hence <X_a^2> = (2 n_th + 1)e^{-2r}. This agrees with the paper's own zero-damping result in the same section, but Eq. (9) reduces to (n_th + 1/2)e^{-2r}; for n_th = 0 it predicts (1/2)e^{-2r} instead of the correct two-mode squeezed vacuum result e^{-2r}. Please correct Eq. (9), the sentence stating that the asymptotic covariance is (n_th + 1/2)e^{-2r}, and any curves or derived quantities that use this formula.
[Model and two-mode squeezing, Eq. (2)] The interaction Hamiltonian (2) is asserted rather than derived from the standard SRS interaction or from plasma kinetic theory. All subsequent results, including Eqs. (4), (9), and (10), depend on this Hamiltonian and on the assumptions that the two phonon modes p and q are independent, equally coupled, Markovian-damped oscillators, that the pumps are undepleted, and that no additional couplings or correlated noise sources are present. Please provide a derivation of Eq. (2), or a precise reference from which it follows, and state the approximations under which the neglected terms are small.
[Model and two-mode squeezing, paragraph after Fig. 2] The claim that for n_th = 100 and r = 7 'the output photon number in each mode reach[es] approximately ~10^18' is inconsistent with Eq. (10). Substituting n_th = 100 and r = 7 into Eq. (10) gives n_th cosh^2 r + (n_th + 1) sinh^2 r ≈ 6×10^7. Please correct the numerical claim or specify if a different quantity (e.g., total photons over a volume or many modes) is intended.

minor comments (4)

[Model and two-mode squeezing, first paragraph] The text says 'a frequency difference equal to the plasma frequency'; this should read 'twice the plasma frequency', consistent with Eq. (1) and with the abstract.
[Single-mode squeezing output] Xc1 is defined as (a3 + a3^† + a4 + a4^†)/2, which equals X_a/√2. Saying it is 'identical to the covariance Xa' is imprecise; the noise reduction factor relative to the vacuum level is the same, but the normalization differs.
[Entire text] There are several typographical errors, including 'Universi ty' in the affiliation, 'breams' instead of 'beams', and 'acheive' instead of 'achieve'.
[Equation (10)] Please define ⟨n3,4⟩ explicitly as the per-mode photon number before Eq. (10) to avoid ambiguity with a total photon number.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the squeezing prediction is an explicit Langevin solution with independent physical inputs; only a non-load-bearing self-citation appears.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained in the usual model-calculation sense. Equation (2) posits a Hamiltonian, Equation (3) defines a Bogoliubov transformation controlled by the pump amplitude ratio, and the subsequent quantum Langevin equations are solved explicitly to produce Equations (9)-(10). The asymptotic squeezing floor and the threshold condition (2 n_th + 1) < e^{2r} are mathematical consequences of that model; no parameter is fitted to the claimed output. The pump ratio r, thermal occupation n_th, and Landau damping rate kappa are stated physical controls or inputs, not fit constants, so the quoted 20/40 dB numbers are computed consequences rather than renamed inputs. The self-citation [39] supplies the phonon normalization that fixes the coupling rate g, but the asymptotic squeezing magnitude and thermal-noise threshold are independent of g, so this citation is not load-bearing for the central claim. No uniqueness theorem is imported to force the chosen mechanism. The apparent factor-of-two discrepancy between the damped result Eq. (9) and the zero-damping statement <X_b^2> = 2 n_th + 1 is an internal consistency or arithmetic concern, not a circularity, and does not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the assumed interaction Hamiltonian and four physics assumptions; the only tuned knob is the squeezing parameter r. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)

r (squeezing parameter) = 4 or 6 for 20/40 dB at nth=10; up to 7 for nth=100
Chosen by setting the pump amplitude ratio tanh r = |alpha1/alpha2|. Controls the predicted squeezing magnitude; larger r reduces the effective coupling G = sqrt(alpha2^2 - alpha1^2) g and increases the required interaction length.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The interaction Hamiltonian in Eq. (2) with coupling g = ckp/2 sqrt(omega_p/omega_3) correctly models the SRS-mediated four-wave mixing.
Introduced in the Model section without derivation; the authors cite [39] for the phonon normalization. The entire squeezing result follows from this Hamiltonian.
domain assumption The pump lasers are undepleted classical coherent fields with constant amplitudes alpha1 and alpha2 over the interaction length.
Used in Eq. (2) and the subsequent Langevin equations; no pump depletion or pump noise is included.
domain assumption The two plasma phonon modes p and q are independent quantum harmonic oscillators with equal frequency omega_p, equal coupling G, and independent Markovian reservoirs at temperature T.
Needed to rewrite the Hamiltonian in the separable Bogoliubov form Eq. (4) and derive Eq. (9).
domain assumption The output optical modes start in vacuum and no sources of noise other than thermal phonons and the vacuum reservoir implied by damping are present.
Equation (9) assumes this; real plasmas have other fluctuations such as inverse bremsstrahlung and competing instabilities.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ultra-strong Quantum Squeezing Mediated by Plasma Waves." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QOP6EARL

@misc{pith2026250712288,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ultra-strong Quantum Squeezing Mediated by Plasma Waves},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QOP6EARL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.12288}
}

abstract

Quantum squeezed states enable precision measurements beyond the standard quantum limit, but conventional solid-state media fundamentally limit pump intensities to the ionization threshold. We demonstrate that plasma waves can mediate ultra-strong two-mode squeezing through stimulated Raman scattering, achieving up to ultrastrong squeezing using $10^{16}{Wcm^{-2}}$ pump lasers. Employing two copropagating pump beams with frequency difference matching twice the plasma frequency, we generate quantum-correlated photon pairs through phonon-mediated four-wave mixing. The process exhibits remarkable thermal noise tolerance, allowing strong squeezing even with large thermal phonon numbers. This plasma-based approach produces squeezed states with ultrahigh photon numbers, opening new possibilities for strong-field applications across optical to X-ray wavelengths.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.12288 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Evolution of (a) squeezing magnitude and (b) average [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Nonlinear Compton scattering in a quantized pump field
quant-ph 2026-08 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

A fully quantized Furry-picture treatment of nonlinear Compton scattering with a single-mode pump, including Wigner-function reduction and predictions for Fock and squeezed coherent pump states.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[39]

Qu and N

K. Qu and N. J. Fisch, Producing entangled photon pairs and quantum squeezed states in plasmas, Phys. Rev. E 110, 065211 (2024)

work page 2024
[1]

D. F. Walls, Squeezed states of light, Nature 306, 141 (1983)

1983
[2]

G. S. Agarwal, Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, 2012)

2012
[3]

Aasi et al

J. Aasi et al. , Enhanced sensitivity of the ligo gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light, Nature Photonics 7, 613 (2013)

work page 2013
[4]

Ganapathy et al

D. Ganapathy et al. (LIGO O4 Detector Collaboration), Broadband quantum enhancement of the ligo detectors with frequency-dependent squeezing, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041021 (2023)

work page 2023
[5]

Moodley and A

C. Moodley and A. Forbes, All-digital quantum ghost imaging: tutorial, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 40, 3073 (2023)

work page 2023
[6]

Mukamel, M

S. Mukamel, M. Freyberger, W. Schleich, M. Bellini, A. Zavatta, G. Leuchs, C. Silberhorn, R. W. Boyd, L. L. S´ anchez-Soto, A. Stefanov, M. Barbieri, A. Paterova, L. Krivitsky, S. Shwartz, K. Tamasaku, K. Dorfman, F. Schlawin, V. Sandoghdar, M. Raymer, A. Marcus, O. Varnavski, T. Goodson, Z.-Y. Zhou, B.-S. Shi, S. Asban, M. Scully, G. Agarwal, T. Peng, A....

work page 2020
[7]

Even Tzur, M

M. Even Tzur, M. Birk, A. Gorlach, M. Kr¨ uger, I. Kaminer, and O. Cohen, Photon-statistics force in ultrafast electron dynamics, Nature Photonics 17, 501 (2023)

2023

Show all 70 references

[8]

Rasputnyi, Z

A. Rasputnyi, Z. Chen, M. Birk, O. Cohen, I. Kaminer, M. Kr¨ uger, D. Seletskiy, M. Chekhova, and F. Tani, High-harmonic generation by a bright squeezed vacuum, Nature Physics 20, 1960 (2024)

2024
[9]

Khalaf and I

M. Khalaf and I. Kaminer, Compton scattering driven by intense quantum light, Science Advances 9, eade0932 (2023)

2023
[10]

Di Piazza and K

A. Di Piazza and K. Qu, Control of quantum radiation by squeezing the quantum vacuum ﬂuctuation (2025), to be submitted

2025
[11]

P. A. Franken and J. F. Ward, Optical harmonics and nonlinear phenomena, Rev. Mod. Phys. 35, 23 (1963)

1963
[12]

Canagasabey, C

A. Canagasabey, C. Corbari, A. V. Gladyshev, F. Liegeois, S. Guillemet, Y. Hernandez, M. V. Yashkov, A. Kosolapov, E. M. Dianov, M. Ibsen, and P. G. Kazansky, High-average-power second-harmonic generation from periodically poled silica ﬁbers, Opt. Lett. 34, 2483 (2009)

2009
[13]

Q. Lin, F. Yaman, and G. P. Agrawal, Photon-pair generation by four-wave mixing in optical ﬁbers, Opt. Lett. 31, 1286 (2006)

2006
[14]

Garay-Palmett, D

K. Garay-Palmett, D. B. Kim, Y. Zhang, F. A. Dom ´ ınguez-Serna, V. O. Lorenz, and A. B. U’Ren, Fiber- based photon-pair generation: tutorial, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 40, 469 (2023)

2023
[15]

Kim and P

C. Kim and P. Kumar, Quadrature-squeezed light detection using a self-generated matched local oscillator , Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1605 (1994)

1994
[16]

Vahlbruch, M

H. Vahlbruch, M. Mehmet, K. Danzmann, and R. Schnabel, Detection of 15 db squeezed states of light and their application for the absolute calibration of photoelectric quantum eﬃciency, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 110801 (2016)

2016
[17]

Varma, Y

S. Varma, Y. H. Chen, and H. M. Milchberg, Trapping and Destruction of Long-Range High-Intensity Optical Filaments by Molecular Quantum Wakes in Air, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 205001 (2008)

2008
[18]

Varma, Y.-H

S. Varma, Y.-H. Chen, J. P. Palastro, A. B. Fallahkair, E. W. Rosenthal, T. Antonsen, and H. M. Milchberg, Molecular quantum wake-induced pulse shaping and extension of femtosecond air ﬁlaments, Phys. Rev. A 86, 023850 (2012)

2012
[19]

Zahedpour, J

S. Zahedpour, J. K. Wahlstrand, and H. M. Milchberg, Quantum Control of Molecular Gas Hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 143601 (2014)

2014
[20]

I. K. Kominis, G. Kolliopoulos, D. Charalambidis, and P. Tzallas, Quantum-optical nature of the recollision process in high-order-harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. A 89, 063827 (2014)

2014
[21]

I. A. Gonoskov, N. Tsatrafyllis, I. K. Kominis, and 6 P. Tzallas, Quantum optical signatures in strong-ﬁeld laser physics: Infrared photon counting in high-order- harmonic generation, Scientiﬁc Reports 6, 32821 (2016)

2016
[22]

Tsatrafyllis, I

N. Tsatrafyllis, I. K. Kominis, I. A. Gonoskov, and P. Tzallas, High-order harmonics measured by the photon statistics of the infrared driving-ﬁeld exiting the atomic medium, Nature Communications 8, 15170 (2017)

2017
[23]

Lewenstein, M

M. Lewenstein, M. F. Ciappina, E. Pisanty, J. Rivera- Dean, P. Stammer, T. Lamprou, and P. Tzallas, Generation of optical schr¨ odinger cat states in intense laser–matter interactions, Nature Physics 17, 1104 (2021)

2021
[24]

Tsatrafyllis, S

N. Tsatrafyllis, S. K¨ uhn, M. Dumergue, P. Foldi, S. Kahaly, E. Cormier, I. A. Gonoskov, B. Kiss, K. Varju, S. Varro, and P. Tzallas, Quantum optical signatures in a strong laser pulse after interaction with semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 193602 (2019)

2019
[25]

Gonoskov, R

I. Gonoskov, R. Sondenheimer, C. H¨ unecke, D. Kartashov, U. Peschel, and S. Gr¨ afe, Nonclassical light generation and control from laser-driven semiconductor intraband excitations, Phys. Rev. B 109, 125110 (2024)

2024
[26]

M. E. Tzur, M. Birk, A. Gorlach, I. Kaminer, M. Kr¨ uger, and O. Cohen, Generation of squeezed high-order harmonics, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033079 (2024)

2024
[27]

Stammer, J

P. Stammer, J. Rivera-Dean, T. Lamprou, E. Pisanty, M. F. Ciappina, P. Tzallas, and M. Lewenstein, High photon number entangled states and coherent state superposition from the extreme ultraviolet to the far infrared, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 123603 (2022)

2022
[28]

Gorlach, O

A. Gorlach, O. Neufeld, N. Rivera, O. Cohen, and I. Kaminer, The quantum-optical nature of high harmonic generation, Nature Communications 11, 4598 (2020)

2020
[29]

Stammer, J

P. Stammer, J. Rivera-Dean, A. Maxwell, T. Lamprou, A. Ord´ o˜ nez, M. F. Ciappina, P. Tzallas, and M. Lewenstein, Quantum electrodynamics of intense laser-matter interactions: A tool for quantum state engineering, PRX Quantum 4, 010201 (2023)

2023
[30]

Theidel, V

D. Theidel, V. Cotte, R. Sondenheimer, V. Shiriaeva, M. Froidevaux, V. Severin, A. Merdji-Larue, P. Mosel, S. Fr¨ ohlich, K.-A. Weber, U. Morgner, M. Kovacev, J. Biegert, and H. Merdji, Evidence of the quantum optical nature of high-harmonic generation, PRX Quantum 5, 040319 (2024)

2024
[31]

Shvets, N

G. Shvets, N. J. Fisch, A. Pukhov, and J. Meyer-ter Vehn, Superradiant ampliﬁcation of an ultrashort laser pulse in a plasma by a counterpropagating pump, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4879 (1998)

1998
[32]

V. M. Malkin, G. Shvets, and N. J. Fisch, Fast compression of laser beams to highly overcritical powers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4448 (1999)

1999
[33]

Cheng, Y

W. Cheng, Y. Avitzour, Y. Ping, S. Suckewer, N. J. Fisch, M. S. Hur, and J. S. Wurtele, Reaching the nonlinear regime of raman ampliﬁcation of ultrashort laser pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 045003 (2005)

2005
[34]

J. Ren, W. Cheng, S. Li, and S. Suckewer, A new method for generating ultraintense and ultrashort laser pulses, Nature Physics 3, 732 (2007)

2007
[35]

J. Ren, S. Li, A. Morozov, S. Suckewer, N. A. Yampolsky, V. M. Malkin, and N. J. Fisch, A compact double-pass Raman backscattering ampliﬁer/compressora, Physics of Plasmas 15, 056702 (2008)

2008
[36]

K. Qu, I. Barth, and N. J. Fisch, Plasma wave seed for raman ampliﬁers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 164801 (2017)

2017
[37]

Vieux, S

G. Vieux, S. Cipiccia, D. W. Grant, N. Lemos, P. Grant, C. Ciocarlan, B. Ersfeld, M. S. Hur, P. Lepipas, G. G. Manahan, G. Raj, D. Reboredo Gil, A. Subiel, G. H. Welsh, S. M. Wiggins, S. R. Yoﬀe, J. P. Farmer, C. Aniculaesei, E. Brunetti, X. Yang, R. Heathcote, G. Nersisyan, C...

2017
[38]

R. K. Kirkwood, D. P. Turnbull, T. Chapman, S. C. Wilks, M. D. Rosen, R. A. London, L. A. Pickworth, W. H. Dunlop, J. D. Moody, D. J. Strozzi, P. A. Michel, L. Divol, O. L. Landen, B. J. MacGowan, B. M. Van Wonterghem, K. B. Fournier, and B. E. Blue, Plasma-based beam combiner...

2018
[40]

V. M. Malkin and N. J. Fisch, Towards megajoule x- ray lasers via relativistic four-photon cascade in plasma, Phys. Rev. E 101, 023211 (2020)

2020
[41]

V. M. Malkin and N. J. Fisch, Resonant four-photon scattering of collinear laser pulses in plasma, Phys. Rev. E 102, 063207 (2020)

2020
[42]

V. M. Malkin and N. J. Fisch, Super-resonant four- photon collinear laser frequency multiplication in plasma , Phys. Rev. E 105, 045207 (2022)

2022
[43]

Griﬃth, K

A. Griﬃth, K. Qu, and N. J. Fisch, Modulation-slippage trade-oﬀ in resonant four-wave upconversion, Physics of Plasmas 28, 052112 (2021)

2021
[44]

V. M. Malkin, G. Shvets, and N. J. Fisch, Detuned Raman Ampliﬁcation of Short Laser Pulses in Plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1208 (2000)

2000
[45]

M. S. Hur, B. Ersfeld, H. Lee, H. Kim, K. Roh, Y. Lee, H. S. Song, M. Kumar, S. Yoﬀe, D. A. Jaroszynski, and H. Suk, Laser pulse compression by a density gradient plasma for exawatt to zettawatt lasers, Nature Photonics 17, 1074 (2023)

2023
[46]

S. L. Braunstein and P. van Loock, Quantum information with continuous variables, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 513 (2005)

2005
[47]

Weedbrook, S

C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. Garc ´ ıa-Patr´ on, N. J. Cerf, T. C. Ralph, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Lloyd, Gaussian quantum information, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 621 (2012)

2012
[48]

P. Rabl, A. Shnirman, and P. Zoller, Generation of squeezed states of nanomechanical resonators by reservoir engineering, Phys. Rev. B 70, 205304 (2004)

2004
[49]

A. S. Parkins, E. Solano, and J. I. Cirac, Unconditional two-mode squeezing of separated atomic ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 053602 (2006)

2006
[50]

T. P. Purdy, P.-L. Yu, R. W. Peterson, N. S. Kampel, and C. A. Regal, Strong optomechanical squeezing of light, Phys. Rev. X 3, 031012 (2013)

2013
[51]

Wang and A

Y.-D. Wang and A. A. Clerk, Reservoir-engineered entanglement in optomechanical systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 253601 (2013)

2013
[52]

Tian, Robust photon entanglement via quantum interference in optomechanical interfaces, Phys

L. Tian, Robust photon entanglement via quantum interference in optomechanical interfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 233602 (2013)

2013
[53]

Qu and G

K. Qu and G. S. Agarwal, Strong squeezing via phonon mediated spontaneous generation of photon pairs, New Journal of Physics 16, 113004 (2014)

2014
[54]

Qu and G

K. Qu and G. S. Agarwal, Generating quadrature 7 squeezed light with dissipative optomechanical coupling, Phys. Rev. A 91, 063815 (2015)

2015
[55]

Magrini, V

L. Magrini, V. A. Camarena-Ch´ avez, C. Bach, A. Johnson, and M. Aspelmeyer, Squeezed light from a levitated nanoparticle at room temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 053601 (2022)

2022
[56]

A. A. Balakin, G. M. Fraiman, N. J. Fisch, and V. M. Malkin, Noise suppression and enhanced focusability in plasma raman ampliﬁer with multi-frequency pump, Physics of Plasmas 10, 4856 (2003)

2003
[57]

R. L. Berger, D. S. Clark, A. A. Solodov, E. J. Valeo, and N. J. Fisch, Inverse bremsstrahlung stabilization of noise in the generation of ultrashort intense pulses by backward raman ampliﬁcation, Physics of Plasmas 11, 1931 (2004)

2004
[58]

Sheﬃeld, D

J. Sheﬃeld, D. Froula, S. Glenzer, and N. Luhmann, Plasma Scattering of Electromagnetic Radiation: Theory and Measurement Techniques (Academic Press, 2010)

2010
[59]

J. E. S. C´ esar, A. S. Coelho, K. N. Cassemiro, A. S. Villar, M. Lassen, P. Nussenzveig, and M. Martinelli, Extra phase noise from thermal ﬂuctuations in nonlinear optical crystals, Phys. Rev. A 79, 063816 (2009)

2009
[60]

Lax, Quantum noise

M. Lax, Quantum noise. iv. quantum theory of noise sources, Phys. Rev. 145, 110 (1966)

1966
[61]

Umstadter, Relativistic laser–plasma interactions, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 36, R151 (2003)

D. Umstadter, Relativistic laser–plasma interactions, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 36, R151 (2003)

2003
[62]

A. G. York, H. M. Milchberg, J. P. Palastro, and T. M. Antonsen, Direct acceleration of electrons in a corrugated plasma waveguide, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 195001 (2008)

2008
[63]

J. P. Palastro, K. G. Miller, M. R. Edwards, A. L. Elliott, L. S. Mack, D. Singh, and A. G. R. Thomas, Arbitrary-velocity laser pulses in plasma waveguides (2025), arXiv:2503.15690

2025 arXiv
[64]

Marqu` es, L

J.-R. Marqu` es, L. Lancia, T. Gangolf, M. Blecher, S. Bola˜ nos, J. Fuchs, O. Willi, F. Amiranoﬀ, R. L. Berger, M. Chiaramello, S. Weber, and C. Riconda, Joule-level high-eﬃciency energy transfer to subpicosecond laser pulses by a plasma-based ampliﬁer, Phys. Rev. X 9, 021008 (2019)

2019
[65]

Tanaka, L

K. Tanaka, L. M. Goldman, W. Seka, M. C. Richardson, J. M. Soures, and E. A. Williams, Stimulated Raman Scattering from uv-Laser-Produced Plasmas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1179 (1982)

1982
[66]

L. A. Wilson, G. J. Tallents, J. Pasley, D. S. Whittaker, S. J. Rose, O. Guilbaud, K. Cassou, S. Kazamias, S. Daboussi, M. Pittman, O. Delmas, J. Demailly, O. Neveu, and D. Ros, Energy transport in short-pulse- laser-heated targets measured using extreme ultraviolet laser back...

2012
[67]

K. R. Manes, O. C. Barr, E. S. Bliss, R. P. Drake, R. O. Godwin, D. G. Gritton, J. S. Hildum, F. W. Holloway, C. A. Hurley, B. C. Johnson, and et al., Novette facility: activation and experimental results, Laser and Particle Beams 3, 173–188 (1985)

1985
[68]

R. P. Drake, R. E. Turner, B. F. Lasinski, E. A. Williams, K. Estabrook, W. L. Kruer, E. M. Campbell, and T. W. Johnston, X-ray emission caused by raman scattering in long-scale-length plasmas, Phys. Rev. A 40, 3219 (1989)

1989
[69]

S. H. Glenzer, G. Gregori, R. W. Lee, F. J. Rogers, S. W. Pollaine, and O. L. Landen, Demonstration of Spectrally Resolved X-Ray Scattering in Dense Plasmas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 175002 (2003)

2003
[70]

S. H. Glenzer, O. L. Landen, P. Neumayer, R. W. Lee, K. Widmann, S. W. Pollaine, R. J. Wallace, G. Gregori, A. H¨ oll, T. Bornath, R. Thiele, V. Schwarz, W.-D. Kraeft, and R. Redmer, Observations of Plasmons in Warm Dense Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 065002 (2007)

2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [39]

Qu and N

K. Qu and N. J. Fisch, Producing entangled photon pairs and quantum squeezed states in plasmas, Phys. Rev. E 110, 065211 (2024)

work page 2024

[2] [1]

D. F. Walls, Squeezed states of light, Nature 306, 141 (1983)

1983

[3] [2]

G. S. Agarwal, Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, 2012)

2012

[4] [3]

Aasi et al

J. Aasi et al. , Enhanced sensitivity of the ligo gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light, Nature Photonics 7, 613 (2013)

work page 2013

[5] [4]

Ganapathy et al

D. Ganapathy et al. (LIGO O4 Detector Collaboration), Broadband quantum enhancement of the ligo detectors with frequency-dependent squeezing, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041021 (2023)

work page 2023

[6] [5]

Moodley and A

C. Moodley and A. Forbes, All-digital quantum ghost imaging: tutorial, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 40, 3073 (2023)

work page 2023

[7] [6]

Mukamel, M

S. Mukamel, M. Freyberger, W. Schleich, M. Bellini, A. Zavatta, G. Leuchs, C. Silberhorn, R. W. Boyd, L. L. S´ anchez-Soto, A. Stefanov, M. Barbieri, A. Paterova, L. Krivitsky, S. Shwartz, K. Tamasaku, K. Dorfman, F. Schlawin, V. Sandoghdar, M. Raymer, A. Marcus, O. Varnavski, T. Goodson, Z.-Y. Zhou, B.-S. Shi, S. Asban, M. Scully, G. Agarwal, T. Peng, A....

work page 2020

[8] [7]

Even Tzur, M

M. Even Tzur, M. Birk, A. Gorlach, M. Kr¨ uger, I. Kaminer, and O. Cohen, Photon-statistics force in ultrafast electron dynamics, Nature Photonics 17, 501 (2023)

2023