Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 100 references

Constraining ALP-Top Interaction from the Chromoelectric Dipole Moment of the Top Quark

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that CP-violating ALP-top couplings generate a top-quark chromoelectric dipole moment that makes the neutron EDM the strongest constraint, $|c_t/f_a| < 1.6\times10^{-3}$ GeV$^{-1}$ for $m_a = 1$ GeV.

desk verdict A genuinely new off-shell two-loop ALP-top CEDM calculation, but the advertised 'strongest limit' contradicts the paper's own flavor bounds and the Weinberg-operator matching uses an unjustified kinematic substitution. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.12570 v2 pith:YV23FW72 submitted 2025-07-16 hep-ph

Subhadip Bisal This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords axion-likeparticlestopquarkchromoelectricdipolemomentCPviolationWeinbergoperatorneutronelectricmercuryBarr-Zeediagramsmoments
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper attempts to establish that CP-violating couplings between an axion-like particle (ALP) and the top quark induce a top-quark chromoelectric dipole moment (CEDM) at one and two loops, and that this CEDM, evaluated at the top pole mass, generates observable electric dipole moments (EDMs) for the neutron and mercury through the Weinberg operator. The central numerical claim is that for $m_a = 1$ GeV the total CEDM is $|\hat d_C^t(m_t)| = 445\,(c_t\,\tilde c_t/f_a^2)$, which translates into the bounds $|c_t/f_a| < 1.6\times10^{-3}$ GeV$^{-1}$ from the neutron EDM, $2.1\times10^{-3}$ GeV$^{-1}$ from mercury, and $8.2\times10^{-3}$ GeV$^{-1}$ from the direct top CEDM limit. The neutron EDM therefore gives the most restrictive constraint on the ALP-top coupling, and the paper argues this is the strongest limit on the product $c_t\tilde c_t/f_a^2$. If the calculation is right, it shows that low-energy EDM searches are competitive with, and in this case stronger than, collider probes of top-philic ALPs.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the top-quark chromoelectric dipole form factor, defined by the effective vertex $\Gamma^\mu_C = \sigma^{\mu\nu} q_\nu (\mu_C^t + i\gamma_5 d_C^t) T^a$ with an off-shell gluon of momentum $q$. The paper computes its one-loop and two-loop (Barr-Zee-shaped) contributions, the latter involving a top-quark loop with an internal gluon and ALP, keeping $q^2\neq 0$ and isolating the coefficient of $\gamma_5\sigma^{\mu\nu}q_\nu$. The bridge to low-energy observables is the threshold correction to the Weinberg operator, $\delta W = g_s^2/(32\pi^2 m_t)\, d_C^t(m_t)$, which seeds the operator whose RG running and hadronic matrix elements produce the neutron and mercury EDMs.

What would settle it

Evaluate the one- and two-loop form factors in Eqs. (4.2) and (A.1)-(A.3) at $q^2\to0$ to obtain $d_C^t(0)$, then feed that value through the same threshold correction and hadronic matrix elements; if the resulting neutron and mercury EDMs differ substantially from the paper's quoted numbers, the substitution $q^2=m_t^2$ into the Weinberg threshold correction is the reason.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery claimed is that the top quark acquires a chromoelectric dipole moment from mixed scalar-pseudoscalar ALP-top interactions, with the two-loop Barr-Zee-type contribution being the dominant term at nonzero momentum transfer. The paper provides the first analytic expressions for the one- and two-loop form factors with off-shell gluon momentum $q^2\neq 0$, evaluates the sum at $q^2=m_t^2$, and obtains $|\hat d_C^t(m_t)|=445\,(c_t\tilde c_t/f_a^2)$ for $m_a=1$ GeV. Passing this through the threshold correction to the Weinberg operator, $\delta W = g_s^2/(32\pi^2 m_t)\,d_C^t(m_t)$, and through the QCD running and hadronic matrix elements, the paper derives neutron and mercury EDMs that are within reach of current experiments; the neutron limit yields $c_t\tilde c_t/f_a^2 < 2.57\times10^{-6}$ GeV$^{-2}$ at $m_a=1$ GeV. This is the paper's main result: a calculable, low-energy bound on the CP-violating ALP-top coupling from EDM experiments.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the top quark's chromoelectric dipole moment, computed at the top pole mass, can be fed directly into the standard threshold correction to the Weinberg operator, whose derivation assumes zero momentum transfer; the paper never compares its $q^2=m_t^2$ value with the $q^2\to0$ limit.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The predicted top CEDM is itself a collider observable: the level $|\hat d_C^t(m_t)| \simeq 445\,(c_t\tilde c_t/f_a^2)$ at $m_a=1$ GeV can be tested in $t\bar t$ production, and the current CMS bound translates into $c_t\tilde c_t/f_a^2 < 6.74\times10^{-5}$ GeV$^{-2}$.
  • The neutron EDM bound is the strongest: $c_t\tilde c_t/f_a^2 < 2.57\times10^{-6}$ GeV$^{-2}$ (at $m_a=1$ GeV), which for $c_t\simeq \tilde c_t$ gives $|c_t/f_a| < 1.6\times10^{-3}$ GeV$^{-1}$.
  • The mercury EDM gives an intermediate constraint, $c_t\tilde c_t/f_a^2 < 4.27\times10^{-6}$ GeV$^{-2}$ at $m_a=1$ GeV.
  • The EDM-derived limits beat the collider bounds collected from ATLAS and CMS searches (di-boson production, $Z\gamma$, $ZZ$, $t\bar t+$ALP, high-$p_T$ $t\bar t$), making low-energy EDM experiments the leading probe of CP-violating ALP-top couplings.
  • For $m_a=100$ GeV the neutron EDM still gives $|c_t/f_a| < 2.28\times10^{-3}$ GeV$^{-1}$, so the constraint persists across the GeV-to-100-GeV ALP mass range considered.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the same two-loop machinery could be adapted to the top quark's chromomagnetic dipole moment, probing the CP-conserving counterpart of this ALP interaction.
  • Beyond the paper: a global fit of top-quark pair production spin correlations and asymmetries at the LHC could extract the product $c_t\tilde c_t$ directly, providing a high-energy cross-check of the EDM-derived bound.
  • Beyond the paper: the calculational chain from the top CEDM to the Weinberg operator could be used to bound ALP couplings to other heavy fermions, such as the bottom quark, with appropriately scaled masses.
  • Beyond the paper: the neutron and mercury bounds constrain the product $c_t\tilde c_t$; if either coupling dominates, the EDM constraint weakens, so future searches for CP asymmetries in $t\bar t$ production would be needed to lift the degeneracy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper considers ALP-top quark interactions that mix CP-even and CP-odd couplings (Eq. 2.2), and computes the induced top quark chromoelectric dipole moment (CEDM) at one-loop and two-loop (Barr-Zee-type) order, keeping the external gluon off-shell and evaluating the form factors at q^2 = m_t^2. This CEDM is then used as an input for the Weinberg operator threshold correction (Eq. 5.1), and, following the hadronic relations in Eqs. (5.2) and (5.4), for the neutron and mercury EDMs. Applying the experimental limits in Eqs. (1.1) and (5.3), the paper derives constraints on the product ct c̃t / fa^2 and, under a maximal-CP benchmark ct ≈ c̃t, on |ct / fa|. The abstract and Conclusions claim that the strongest limit comes from the neutron EDM.

Significance. If correct, the complete two-loop computation of the top CEDM with off-shell gluon for CP-violating ALP couplings is a useful addition to the EDM literature: the paper provides detailed analytical form factors in Appendix A and follows established hadronic matrix-element results. The treatment of the top CEDM as a dynamical quantity entering the Weinberg operator is a valid and interesting direction. However, the central 'strongest limit from the neutron EDM' claim is internally inconsistent with the paper's own flavor bounds, and the Weinberg-operator matching is performed at a kinematic point not justified by the cited derivations. These issues must be addressed before the results can be accepted as stated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 5, Eq. (5.1)] The threshold correction δW = g_s^2/(32π^2 m_t) d_C^t(m_t) is evaluated with the CEDM form factor at q^2 = m_t^2. The derivations cited for this formula (Refs. [63], [77], [78]) integrate out the top quark at static momentum transfer, i.e., with the CEDM at q^2 → 0. The paper neither justifies the substitution q^2 = m_t^2 nor provides the q^2 → 0 limit of its two-loop form factors. Since the neutron and mercury EDM numbers in Sec. 7 scale linearly with this input, the headline bounds are not those produced by the cited formalism unless the q^2 dependence is demonstrated to be negligible.
  2. [Sec. 7 vs. Sec. 6; Abstract and Sec. 8] The claim that the neutron EDM gives the strongest constraint is contradicted by the paper's own Section 6. Equation (6.7) gives |ct/fa| < 1.15×10^-6 GeV^-1 from B-meson decays for ma ≲ 5 GeV. Under the maximal-CP benchmark ct ≈ c̃t used in Section 7, this bound is roughly 1400 times stronger than the neutron EDM bound |ct/fa| < 1.6×10^-3 GeV^-1 at ma = 1 GeV (Eq. 7.8). The comparison in Section 7 omits the flavor bounds of Section 6, so the central summary claim in the abstract and Conclusions is not supported by the paper's own numbers. The abstract and Conclusions must be corrected and the comparison must include the Section 6 bounds.
  3. [Sec. 4 and Eq. (7.1)] The paper notes that the CEDM at q^2 = m_t^2 is complex, with both real and imaginary parts. However, the experimental limit in Eq. (1.1) is applied to the modulus |d̂_C^t(m_t)| = 445 (ct c̃t / fa^2) without stating whether the CMS measurement constrains the modulus, the real part, or the imaginary part. Because the bound in Eq. (7.2) and the resulting constraint (7.3) use the modulus, a clarification of the experimental definition is needed for the numerical results to be reproducible.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 2, Eq. (2.1)] The statement that 'the couplings of ALPs to fermions are proportional to the fermion masses' is convention-dependent; in the derivative basis the interaction is mass-independent. This could be stated more carefully to avoid confusion.
  2. [Sec. 4.2, Eq. (4.9)] The notation 'F1(q)^2' in Eq. (4.9) is confusing; it should be F1(q^2) to match the argument of the form factors in Appendix A.
  3. [Sec. 5, Eq. (5.2)] The numerical coefficients in Eq. (5.2) are quoted without uncertainties even though the inputs have stated uncertainties; an estimate of the propagated error on the neutron EDM would be useful for assessing the robustness of the bounds.
  4. [Appendix A, Eq. (A.4)] The definitions of ξ and M use the variable y both as an integration variable and inside M; the dependence on x and y should be made explicit to avoid ambiguity.
  5. [Throughout] There are several typos and formatting issues, e.g., 'T op' in the running header, 'lowe-energy' in Section 6, and 'forma< 100 GeV' in Eq. (6.4).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the top-quark CEDM is computed from the Lagrangian in Eq. (2.1) with external experimental inputs and independent hadronic matrix elements.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained: the one- and two-loop CEDM form factors (Sec. 4, Eqs. (4.1)-(4.10) and Appendix A) are computed directly from the ALP-top Lagrangian (2.1), and the constraints in Sec. 7 are obtained by comparing this computed quantity with external experimental bounds (CMS limit Eq. (1.1), neutron EDM Ref. [79], Hg EDM Ref. [80]). No free parameter is fitted to the target observable, and no 'prediction' is defined in terms of the data it is said to constrain. The hadronic translations (Eqs. (5.1), (5.2), (5.4)) are taken from independent literature (Refs. [63, 76-87]); the only self-citations (Refs. [74, 75]) are methodological references for the Barr-Zee two-loop technique, and the full two-loop expressions are displayed in the appendix, so the core result does not rest on an unverified self-citation. Two issues raised in review are correctness concerns rather than circularity: (i) the threshold correction (5.1) is evaluated at q^2=m_t^2 whereas the cited derivations integrate out the top at q^2=0, a kinematic-matching question that does not make the CEDM computation an input to itself; and (ii) the abstract's 'strongest limit from neutron EDM' is inconsistent with the paper's own B-decay bound Eq. (6.7) at m_a=1 GeV, which is roughly 1400 times stronger under the paper's ct about equal to c̃t assumption. These are internal-consistency or correctness issues, not circular reasoning, and they do not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests entirely on the ALP model parameters (ct, c̃t, fa, m_a) as free inputs, plus the assumption that the CP-violating ALP-top contact interaction is the dominant source of the top CEDM. No constants are fitted to data; the only hand-set benchmark is ct = c̃t ('maximal CP violation') used to convert product bounds into single-coupling bounds. The weakest structural input is the use of the CEDM form factor at q^2 = m_t^2 inside the Weinberg operator threshold correction (Eq 5.1), where the cited matching literature uses the static limit.

free parameters (3)
  • ALP mass m_a = not fitted; scanned over 1 to 100 GeV
    Model parameter scanned to produce the bounds in Sec 7; headline numbers quoted at m_a = 1 GeV and 100 GeV.
  • Product ct*c̃t/fa^2 (CP-violating ALP-top coupling) = bounded, not fitted: < 6.74e-5 GeV^-2 (top CEDM) and < 2.57e-6 GeV^-2 (neutron EDM) at m_a = 1 GeV
    The combination constrained by the CEDM and EDM bounds; it is a free model parameter, not a fitted value.
  • Maximal CP violation benchmark ct = c̃t = ct/fa = c̃t/fa < 1.6e-3 GeV^-1 at m_a = 1 GeV
    Hand-chosen benchmark that converts the product bound into a bound on a single coupling; without it only the product is constrained.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The CP-violating ALP-top interaction (2.1) with mass-proportional couplings m_f/fa is the only source of the top CEDM and the low-energy EDMs; loop-induced ALP-gauge couplings are neglected.
    Sec 2 states that additional ALP-gauge couplings 'can be generated at loop level' but they are not included in the calculation; if ALP-gluon couplings are generated, they would feed the Weinberg operator independently.
  • ad hoc to paper The Weinberg operator threshold correction (5.1) takes the CEDM form factor at q^2 = m_t^2 as its input.
    Refs [63, 77, 78] derive the threshold correction by integrating out the top at static momentum transfer (q^2 -> 0). Evaluating at q^2 = m_t^2 changes the input if the form factor is momentum dependent, with no justification given in Sec 5.
  • domain assumption The diagram set of Sec 4.2 (Fig 1 one-loop, Fig 2 two-loop Barr-Zee) exhausts the one- and two-loop contributions.
    The completeness of the two-loop set is asserted ('we perform a complete two-loop computation') without enumerating or excluding other topologies such as QCD corrections to the one-loop diagram.
  • standard math Standard loop-integral reductions and the dilogarithm representation f2 (A.6) are correct as printed.
    The multi-page form factors (A.1)-(A.3) rest on unverifiable algebraic reductions with no cross-check, so a transcription error would propagate directly into every bound in Sec 7.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Constraining ALP-Top Interaction from the Chromoelectric Dipole Moment of the Top Quark." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YV23FW72

@misc{pith2026250712570,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Constraining ALP-Top Interaction from the Chromoelectric Dipole Moment of the Top Quark},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YV23FW72}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.12570}
}
abstract

The couplings of axion-like particles (ALPs) to Standard Model fermions are proportional to the fermion masses, making the interaction with the top quark particularly significant. In this study, we consider an ALP that is a mixture of CP-even and CP-odd components, thereby introducing CP violation. This CP violation, in turn, gives rise to electric dipole moments (EDMs) of quarks and leptons, as well as chromoelectric dipole moments (CEDMs) of quarks. We compute the one-loop and two-loop contributions to the top quark CEDM induced by the ALP. In our calculation, we treat the external gluon as off-shell with momentum $q^2 \neq 0$, derive the analytical results, and finally evaluate the top quark CEDM at $q^2 = m_t^2$, corresponding to the top quark pole mass. This value is relevant for subsequent calculations of the EDMs of the neutron and mercury. By applying current experimental bounds on EDMs and CEDMs, we derive constraints on the ALP-top quark coupling, with the strongest limit coming from the neutron EDM.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [38]

    Di Luzio, R

    L. Di Luzio, R. Gröber and P. Paradisi,Hunting forCP-violating axionlike particle interactions, Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 095027 [2010.13760]

    arXiv 2021

  2. [51]

    Two-loop contributions of axion-like particles to electromagnetic and chromomagnetic form factors

    M. Neubert and M. Schnubel,Two-loop contributions of axion-like particles to electromagnetic and chromomagnetic form factors, Eur. Phys. J. C84 (2024) 571 [2403.00913]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  3. [63]

    J. F. Kamenik, M. Papucci and A. Weiler,Constraining the dipole moments of the top quark, Phys. Rev. D85 (2012) 071501 [1107.3143]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  4. [77]

    Braaten, C.-S

    E. Braaten, C.-S. Li and T.-C. Yuan,The Evolution of Weinberg’s Gluonic CP Violation Operator, Phys. Rev. Lett.64 (1990) 1709

    1990

  5. [78]

    Chang, T

    D. Chang, T. W. Kephart, W.-Y. Keung and T. C. Yuan,The Chromoelectric dipole moment of the heavy quark and purely gluonic CP violating operators, Phys. Rev. Lett.68 (1992) 439

    1992

  6. [1]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn,CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1440

    1977

  7. [2]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn,Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. D16 (1977) 1791

    1977

  8. [3]

    Weinberg,A New Light Boson?, Phys

    S. Weinberg,A New Light Boson?, Phys. Rev. Lett.40 (1978) 223

    1978

Show all 100 references
  1. [4]

    Wilczek,Problem of StrongP and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys

    F. Wilczek,Problem of StrongP and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett.40 (1978) 279

    1978

  2. [5]

    Preskill, M

    J. Preskill, M. B. Wise and F. Wilczek,Cosmology of the Invisible Axion, Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 127

    1983

  3. [6]

    L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie,A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion, Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 133

    1983

  4. [7]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler,The Not So Harmless Axion, Phys. Lett. B120 (1983) 137

    1983

  5. [8]

    R. L. Davis,Cosmic Axions from Cosmic Strings, Phys. Lett. B180 (1986) 225

    1986

  6. [9]

    Davidson and K

    A. Davidson and K. C. Wali,MINIMAL FLAVOR UNIFICATION VIA MULTIGENERATIONAL PECCEI-QUINN SYMMETRY, Phys. Rev. Lett.48 (1982) 11

    1982

  7. [10]

    Wilczek,Axions and Family Symmetry Breaking, Phys

    F. Wilczek,Axions and Family Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett.49 (1982) 1549

    1982

  8. [11]

    Y. Ema, K. Hamaguchi, T. Moroi and K. Nakayama,Flaxion: a minimal extension to solve puzzles in the standard model, JHEP 01 (2017) 096 [1612.05492]

    2017 arXiv

  9. [12]

    Calibbi, F

    L. Calibbi, F. Goertz, D. Redigolo, R. Ziegler and J. Zupan,Minimal axion model from flavor, Phys. Rev. D95 (2017) 095009 [1612.08040]

    2017 arXiv

  10. [13]

    P. W. Graham, D. E. Kaplan and S. Rajendran,Cosmological Relaxation of the Electroweak Scale, Phys. Rev. Lett.115 (2015) 221801 [1504.07551]

    2015 arXiv

  11. [14]

    Jaeckel and A

    J. Jaeckel and A. Ringwald,The Low-Energy Frontier of Particle Physics, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60 (2010) 405 [1002.0329]

    2010 arXiv

  12. [15]

    D. J. E. Marsh,Axion Cosmology, Phys. Rept. 643 (2016) 1 [1510.07633]

    2016 arXiv

  13. [16]

    I. G. Irastorza and J. Redondo,New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.102 (2018) 89 [1801.08127]

    2018 arXiv

  14. [17]

    Di Luzio, M

    L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti, E. Nardi and L. Visinelli,The landscape of QCD axion models, Phys. Rept. 870 (2020) 1 [2003.01100]. – 20 –

    2020 arXiv

  15. [18]

    Döbrich, J

    B. Döbrich, J. Jaeckel and T. Spadaro,Light in the beam dump - ALP production from decay photons in proton beam-dumps, JHEP 05 (2019) 213 [1904.02091]

    2019 arXiv

  16. [19]

    Jaeckel and M

    J. Jaeckel and M. Spannowsky,Probing MeV to 90 GeV axion-like particles with LEP and LHC, Phys. Lett. B753 (2016) 482 [1509.00476]

    2016 arXiv

  17. [20]

    Knapen, T

    S. Knapen, T. Lin, H. K. Lou and T. Melia,Searching for Axionlike Particles with Ultraperipheral Heavy-Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.118 (2017) 171801 [1607.06083]

    2017 arXiv

  18. [21]

    Brivio, M

    I. Brivio, M. B. Gavela, L. Merlo, K. Mimasu, J. M. No, R. del Rey et al.,ALPs Effective Field Theory and Collider Signatures, Eur. Phys. J. C77 (2017) 572 [1701.05379]

    2017 arXiv

  19. [22]

    Mariotti, D

    A. Mariotti, D. Redigolo, F. Sala and K. Tobioka,New LHC bound on low-mass diphoton resonances, Phys. Lett. B783 (2018) 13 [1710.01743]

    2018 arXiv

  20. [23]

    Cid Vidal, A

    X. Cid Vidal, A. Mariotti, D. Redigolo, F. Sala and K. Tobioka,New Axion Searches at Flavor Factories, JHEP 01 (2019) 113 [1810.09452]

    2019 arXiv

  21. [24]

    Aloni, Y

    D. Aloni, Y. Soreq and M. Williams,Coupling QCD-Scale Axionlike Particles to Gluons, Phys. Rev. Lett.123 (2019) 031803 [1811.03474]

    2019 arXiv

  22. [25]

    Aloni, C

    D. Aloni, C. Fanelli, Y. Soreq and M. Williams,Photoproduction of Axionlike Particles, Phys. Rev. Lett.123 (2019) 071801 [1903.03586]

    2019 arXiv

  23. [26]

    Baldenegro, S

    C. Baldenegro, S. Fichet, G. von Gersdorff and C. Royon,Searching for axion-like particles with proton tagging at the LHC, JHEP 06 (2018) 131 [1803.10835]

    2018 arXiv

  24. [27]

    Barbosa, M

    S. Barbosa, M. Coelho, S. Fichet, G. G. da Silveira and M. Machado,The LHC as an Axion-Photon Collider, 2506.10066

  25. [28]

    Bauer, M

    M. Bauer, M. Neubert and A. Thamm,Collider Probes of Axion-Like Particles, JHEP 12 (2017) 044 [1708.00443]

    2017 arXiv

  26. [29]

    Bauer, M

    M. Bauer, M. Neubert and A. Thamm,LHC as an Axion Factory: Probing an Axion Explanation for (g− 2)µ with Exotic Higgs Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.119 (2017) 031802 [1704.08207]

    2017 arXiv

  27. [30]

    W. J. Marciano, A. Masiero, P. Paradisi and M. Passera,Contributions of axionlike particles to lepton dipole moments, Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 115033 [1607.01022]

    2016 arXiv

  28. [31]

    J. E. Moody and F. Wilczek,NEW MACROSCOPIC FORCES?, Phys. Rev. D30 (1984) 130

    1984

  29. [32]

    Pospelov,CP odd interaction of axion with matter, Phys

    M. Pospelov,CP odd interaction of axion with matter, Phys. Rev. D58 (1998) 097703 [hep-ph/9707431]

    1998 arXiv

  30. [33]

    Raffelt,Limits on a CP-violating scalar axion-nucleon interaction, Phys

    G. Raffelt,Limits on a CP-violating scalar axion-nucleon interaction, Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 015001 [1205.1776]

    2012 arXiv

  31. [34]

    Bertolini, L

    S. Bertolini, L. Di Luzio and F. Nesti,Axion-mediated forces, CP violation and left-right interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.126 (2021) 081801 [2006.12508]

    2021 arXiv

  32. [35]

    C. A. J. O’Hare and E. Vitagliano,Cornering the axion withCP-violating interactions, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 115026 [2010.03889]

    2020 arXiv

  33. [36]

    Y. V. Stadnik, V. A. Dzuba and V. V. Flambaum,Improved Limits on Axionlike-Particle-Mediated P , T -Violating Interactions between Electrons and Nucleons from Electric Dipole Moments of Atoms and Molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.120 (2018) 013202 [1708.00486]. – 21 –

    2018 arXiv

  34. [37]

    V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flambaum, I. B. Samsonov and Y. V. Stadnik,New constraints on axion-mediated P,T-violating interaction from electric dipole moments of diamagnetic atoms, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 035048 [1805.01234]

    2018 arXiv

  35. [39]

    LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group collaboration, J. R. Andersen et al., Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 3. Higgs Properties, 1307.1347

    arXiv

  36. [40]

    Huang and T.-J

    C.-S. Huang and T.-J. Li,Electric dipole moment and chromoelectric electric dipole moment of the top quark in SU(3)(C) x SU(3)(L) x U(1)(X) model, Z. Phys. C 68 (1995) 319

    1995

  37. [41]

    Ibrahim and P

    T. Ibrahim and P. Nath,The Chromoelectric Dipole Moment of the Top Quark in Models with Vector Like Multiplets, Phys. Rev. D84 (2011) 015003 [1104.3851]

    2011 arXiv

  38. [42]

    Aboubrahim, T

    A. Aboubrahim, T. Ibrahim, P. Nath and A. Zorik,Chromoelectric Dipole Moments of Quarks in MSSM Extensions, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 035013 [1507.02668]

    2015 arXiv

  39. [43]

    Gorbahn and U

    M. Gorbahn and U. Haisch,Searching fort→c(u)h with dipole moments, JHEP 06 (2014) 033 [1404.4873]

    2014 arXiv

  40. [44]

    A. I. Hernández-Juárez, A. Moyotl and G. Tavares-Velasco,Chromomagnetic and chromoelectric dipole moments of the top quark in the fourth-generation THDM, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 035040 [1805.00615]

    2018 arXiv

  41. [45]

    A. I. Hernández-Juárez, G. Tavares-Velasco and A. Moyotl,Chromomagnetic and chromoelectric dipole moments of quarks in the reduced 331 model, Chin. Phys. C 45 (2021) 113101 [2012.09883]

    2021 arXiv

  42. [46]

    Gisbert, V

    H. Gisbert, V. Miralles and J. Ruiz-Vidal,Electric dipole moments from colour-octet scalars, JHEP 04 (2022) 077 [2111.09397]

    2022 arXiv

  43. [47]

    M. Aiko, M. Endo, S. Kanemura and Y. Mura,Electroweak baryogenesis in 2HDM without EDM cancellation, 2504.07705

    arXiv

  44. [48]

    T. Abe, J. Hisano, T. Kitahara and K. Tobioka,Gauge invariant Barr-Zee type contributions to fermionic EDMs in the two-Higgs doublet models, JHEP 01 (2014) 106 [1311.4704]

    2014 arXiv

  45. [49]

    Y. T. Chien, V. Cirigliano, W. Dekens, J. de Vries and E. Mereghetti,Direct and indirect constraints on CP-violating Higgs-quark and Higgs-gluon interactions, JHEP 02 (2016) 011 [1510.00725]

    2016 arXiv

  46. [50]

    Nakai and M

    Y. Nakai and M. Reece,Electric Dipole Moments in Natural Supersymmetry, JHEP 08 (2017) 031 [1612.08090]

    2017 arXiv

  47. [52]

    CMS collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al.,Measurement of the top quark forward-backward production asymmetry and the anomalous chromoelectric and chromomagnetic moments in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV, JHEP 06 (2020) 146 [1912.09540]

    2020 arXiv

  48. [53]

    Hisano, K

    J. Hisano, K. Tsumura and M. J. S. Yang,QCD Corrections to Neutron Electric Dipole Moment from Dimension-six Four-Quark Operators, Phys. Lett. B713 (2012) 473 [1205.2212]. – 22 –

    2012 arXiv

  49. [54]

    Maltoni, D

    F. Maltoni, D. Pagani and S. Tentori,Top-quark pair production as a probe of light top-philic scalars and anomalous Higgs interactions, JHEP 09 (2024) 098 [2406.06694]

    2024 arXiv

  50. [55]

    Di Luzio, H

    L. Di Luzio, H. Gisbert, G. Levati, P. Paradisi and P. Sørensen,CP-Violating Axions: A Theory Review, 2312.17310

    arXiv

  51. [56]

    Di Luzio, G

    L. Di Luzio, G. Levati and P. Paradisi,The chiral Lagrangian of CP-violating axion-like particles, JHEP 02 (2024) 020 [2311.12158]

    2024 arXiv

  52. [57]

    Cao, J.-N

    Q.-H. Cao, J.-N. Fu, Y. Liu, X.-H. Wang and R. Zhang,Probing top-philic new physics via four-top-quark production, Chin. Phys. C 45 (2021) 093107 [2105.03372]

    2021 arXiv

  53. [58]

    Blasi, F

    S. Blasi, F. Maltoni, A. Mariotti, K. Mimasu, D. Pagani and S. Tentori,Top-philic ALP phenomenology at the LHC: the elusive mass-window, JHEP 06 (2024) 077 [2311.16048]

    2024 arXiv

  54. [59]

    Tentori,Top-philic ALP phenomenology at the LHC, in16th International Workshop on Top Quark Physics, 1, 2024,2401.05068

    S. Tentori,Top-philic ALP phenomenology at the LHC, in16th International Workshop on Top Quark Physics, 1, 2024,2401.05068

    2024 arXiv

  55. [60]

    Weinberg,Larger Higgs Exchange Terms in the Neutron Electric Dipole Moment, Phys

    S. Weinberg,Larger Higgs Exchange Terms in the Neutron Electric Dipole Moment, Phys. Rev. Lett.63 (1989) 2333

    1989

  56. [61]

    J. F. Gunion and D. Wyler,Inducing a large neutron electric dipole moment via a quark chromoelectric dipole moment, Phys. Lett. B248 (1990) 170

    1990

  57. [62]

    Haberl, O

    P. Haberl, O. Nachtmann and A. Wilch,Top production in hadron hadron collisions and anomalous top - gluon couplings, Phys. Rev. D53 (1996) 4875 [hep-ph/9505409]

    1996 arXiv

  58. [64]

    Bernreuther and Z.-G

    W. Bernreuther and Z.-G. Si,Top quark spin correlations and polarization at the LHC: standard model predictions and effects of anomalous top chromo moments, Phys. Lett. B 725 (2013) 115 [1305.2066]

    2013 arXiv

  59. [65]

    Khachatryan et al.,Measurements of t t-bar spin correlations and top quark polarization using dilepton final states in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV, Phys

    CMS collaboration, V. Khachatryan et al.,Measurements of t t-bar spin correlations and top quark polarization using dilepton final states in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 052007 [1601.01107]

    2016 arXiv

  60. [66]

    I. D. Choudhury and A. Lahiri,Anomalous chromomagnetic moment of quarks, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 30 (2015) 1550113 [1409.0073]

    2015 arXiv

  61. [67]

    Bermudez, L

    R. Bermudez, L. Albino, L. X. Gutiérrez-Guerrero, M. E. Tejeda-Yeomans and A. Bashir, Quark-gluon Vertex: A Perturbation Theory Primer and Beyond, Phys. Rev. D95 (2017) 034041 [1702.04437]

    2017 arXiv

  62. [68]

    Martinez, M

    R. Martinez, M. A. Perez and N. Poveda,Chromomagnetic Dipole Moment of the Top Quark Revisited, Eur. Phys. J. C53 (2008) 221 [hep-ph/0701098]

    2008 arXiv

  63. [69]

    A. I. Hernández-Juárez, A. Moyotl and G. Tavares-Velasco,New estimate of the chromomagnetic dipole moment of quarks in the standard model, Eur. Phys. J. Plus136 (2021) 262 [2009.11955]

    2021 arXiv

  64. [70]

    Czarnecki and B

    A. Czarnecki and B. Krause,Neutron electric dipole moment in the standard model: Valence quark contributions, Phys. Rev. Lett.78 (1997) 4339 [hep-ph/9704355]

    1997 arXiv

  65. [71]

    Particle Data Group collaboration, P. A. Zyla et al.,Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2020 (2020) 083C01. – 23 –

    2020

  66. [72]

    A. I. Hernández-Juárez, A. Moyotl and G. Tavares-Velasco,Bounds on the absorptive parts of the chromomagnetic and chromoelectric dipole moments of the top quark from LHC data, Eur. Phys. J. Plus137 (2022) 925 [2109.09978]

    2022 arXiv

  67. [73]

    S. M. Barr and A. Zee,Electric Dipole Moment of the Electron and of the Neutron, Phys. Rev. Lett.65 (1990) 21

    1990

  68. [74]

    Bisal,Two-loop contributions to the anomalous chromomagnetic dipole moment of the top quark in two-Higgs-doublet models, Phys

    S. Bisal,Two-loop contributions to the anomalous chromomagnetic dipole moment of the top quark in two-Higgs-doublet models, Phys. Lett. B855 (2024) 138848 [2404.14065]

    2024 arXiv

  69. [75]

    Bisal, D

    S. Bisal, D. Das, S. Majhi and S. Mitra,Production of singlet dominated scalar(s) at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B839 (2023) 137806 [2207.01358]

    2023 arXiv

  70. [76]

    Degrassi, E

    G. Degrassi, E. Franco, S. Marchetti and L. Silvestrini,QCD corrections to the electric dipole moment of the neutron in the MSSM, JHEP 11 (2005) 044 [hep-ph/0510137]

    2005 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Abel et al.,Measurement of the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of the Neutron, Phys

    C. Abel et al.,Measurement of the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of the Neutron, Phys. Rev. Lett.124 (2020) 081803 [2001.11966]

    2020 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Graner, Y

    B. Graner, Y. Chen, E. G. Lindahl and B. R. Heckel,Reduced Limit on the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of Hg199, Phys. Rev. Lett.116 (2016) 161601 [1601.04339]

    2016 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Pospelov and A

    M. Pospelov and A. Ritz,Electric dipole moments as probes of new physics, Annals Phys. 318 (2005) 119 [hep-ph/0504231]

    2005 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Pospelov and A

    M. Pospelov and A. Ritz,Neutron EDM from electric and chromoelectric dipole moments of quarks, Phys. Rev. D63 (2001) 073015 [hep-ph/0010037]

    2001 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Cirigliano, A

    V. Cirigliano, A. Crivellin, W. Dekens, J. de Vries, M. Hoferichter and E. Mereghetti,CP Violation in Higgs-Gauge Interactions: From Tabletop Experiments to the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 051801 [1903.03625]

    2019 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Yamanaka, S

    JLQCD collaboration, N. Yamanaka, S. Hashimoto, T. Kaneko and H. Ohki,Nucleon charges with dynamical overlap fermions, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 054516 [1805.10507]

    2018 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Osamura, P

    N. Osamura, P. Gubler and N. Yamanaka,Contribution of the Weinberg-type operator to atomic and nuclear electric dipole moments, JHEP 06 (2022) 072 [2203.06878]

    2022 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Yamanaka, B

    N. Yamanaka, B. K. Sahoo, N. Yoshinaga, T. Sato, K. Asahi and B. P. Das,Probing exotic phenomena at the interface of nuclear and particle physics with the electric dipole moments of diamagnetic atoms: A unique window to hadronic and semi-leptonic CP violation, Eur. Phys. J. A5...

    2017 arXiv

  79. [87]

    D. A. Demir, M. Pospelov and A. Ritz,Hadronic EDMs, the Weinberg operator, and light gluinos, Phys. Rev. D67 (2003) 015007 [hep-ph/0208257]

    2003 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Yamanaka and E

    N. Yamanaka and E. Hiyama,Weinberg operator contribution to the nucleon electric dipole moment in the quark model, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 035023 [2011.02531]

    2021 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Esser, M

    F. Esser, M. Madigan, V. Sanz and M. Ubiali,On the coupling of axion-like particles to the top quark, JHEP 09 (2023) 063 [2303.17634]. – 24 –

    2023 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Hosseini and M

    Y. Hosseini and M. Mohammadi Najafabadi,Exploring axionlike particle couplings through single top tW-channel and top pair production at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 055026 [2408.11588]

    2024 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Ebadi, S

    J. Ebadi, S. Khatibi and M. Mohammadi Najafabadi,New probes for axionlike particles at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 015016 [1901.03061]

    2019 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Carra, V

    S. Carra, V. Goumarre, R. Gupta, S. Heim, B. Heinemann, J. Kuechler et al.,Constraining off-shell production of axionlike particles with Zγ and WW differential cross-section measurements, Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 092005 [2106.10085]

    2021 arXiv

  85. [93]

    M. B. Gavela, J. M. No, V. Sanz and J. F. de Trocóniz,Nonresonant Searches for Axionlike Particles at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett.124 (2020) 051802 [1905.12953]

    2020 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Tumasyan et al.,Search for heavy resonances decaying to ZZ or ZW and axion-like particles mediating nonresonant ZZ or ZH production at√s = 13 TeV, JHEP 04 (2022) 087 [2111.13669]

    CMS collaboration, A. Tumasyan et al.,Search for heavy resonances decaying to ZZ or ZW and axion-like particles mediating nonresonant ZZ or ZH production at√s = 13 TeV, JHEP 04 (2022) 087 [2111.13669]

    2022 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Cortina Gil et al.,Measurement of the very rare K+→π+νν decay, JHEP 06 (2021) 093 [2103.15389]

    NA62 collaboration, E. Cortina Gil et al.,Measurement of the very rare K+→π+νν decay, JHEP 06 (2021) 093 [2103.15389]

    2021 arXiv

  88. [96]

    BaBar collaboration, J. P. Lees et al.,Search forB→K (∗)νν and invisible quarkonium decays, Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 112005 [1303.7465]

    2013 arXiv

  89. [97]

    A. V. Phan and S. Westhoff,Precise tests of the axion coupling to tops, JHEP 05 (2024) 075 [2312.00872]

    2024 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Aad et al.,Search for a new pseudoscalar decaying into a pair of muons in events with a top-quark pair at s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys

    ATLAScollaboration, G. Aad et al.,Search for a new pseudoscalar decaying into a pair of muons in events with a top-quark pair at s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 092007 [2304.14247]

    2023 arXiv

  91. [99]

    CMS collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al.,Search for physics beyond the standard model in multilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV, JHEP 03 (2020) 051 [1911.04968]

    2020 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Bruggisser, L

    S. Bruggisser, L. Grabitz and S. Westhoff,Global analysis of the ALP effective theory, JHEP 01 (2024) 092 [2308.11703]. – 25 –

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.