Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 30 references

Pixel Perfect MegaMed: A Megapixel-Scale Vision-Language Foundation Model for Generating High Resolution Medical Images

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims to be the first vision-language foundation model to generate 1024×1024 chest X-rays, and shows that adding 2,000 such images to a 100-image real training set improves classification AUC and F1 in low-data regimes.

desk verdict A modest SDXL-LoRA recipe for 1024x1024 chest X-rays whose main claim about resolution is untested because the augmentation experiment confounds resolution with data volume. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.12698 v2 pith:HG47YH56 submitted 2025-07-17 eess.IV cs.CV

Zahra TehraniNasab , Hujun Ni , Amar Kumar , Tal Arbel This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.IVcs.CV
keywords medicalimagesynthesischestX-raygenerationvision-languagefoundationmodellatentdiffusionLoRAfine-tuninghigh-resolutionimagingdataaugmentationlow-dataclassification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a text-conditioned diffusion foundation model can generate 1024×1024 chest X-rays that are visually faithful and useful for training classifiers, and that this is the first such vision-language model at that resolution. The authors fine-tune SDXL with low-rank adaptation on CheXpert, using tiled generation to reach megapixel scale, and evaluate the result both with image-quality metrics (FID, Vendi Score) and by augmenting 100 real images per class with 2,000 synthetic ones. They report consistent AUC and F1 gains on held-out CheXpert data and on MIMIC-CXR, including large F1 jumps for classes that were nearly undetectable in the low-data baseline. If correct, the result would mean high-resolution synthetic radiographs are a practical source of training data for data-limited clinical settings.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is a latent diffusion model (SDXL) fine-tuned with LoRA on CheXpert, with text conditioning from concatenated OpenCLIP and CLIP embeddings and prompts generated from the dataset's binary findings labels. To exceed the base model's trained resolution, generation is done with MultiDiffusion: overlapping latent tiles are denoised independently under the same prompt and then blended by weighted averaging, preserving local detail and global coherence at 1024×1024. A separate progressive upscaling module then runs an upsample-diffuse-denoise loop with skip residuals and dilated sampling to carry images to 2048×2048.

What would settle it

Train the same EfficientNet classifier on 100 real images augmented with (a) 2,000 additional real images from CheXpert, (b) 2,000 synthetic images downsampled to 256×256 or 512×512, and (c) 2,000 synthetic images at 1024×1024, keeping the test set fixed. If (c) does not beat (a) and (b), the claim that megapixel resolution drives the gains is falsified; if (a) matches (c), the gains come from sample size rather than resolution.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central discovery is that fine-tuning Stable Diffusion XL with LoRA on CheXpert, combined with MultiDiffusion tiling, produces 1024×1024 chest X-rays that preserve local texture and pathology cues well enough to improve downstream classification. For each of six findings, augmenting a 100-image real training set with 2,000 synthetic images raises AUC-ROC and F1 on the CheXpert test set, and notably on MIMIC-CXR where baseline F1 scores for Lung Opacity, Edema, No Finding and Pneumothorax were near zero. The method also includes an upsample-diffuse-denoise loop that pushes images to 2048×2048, though the authors state that at extremes beyond this, the model can hallucinate fine structures.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the classification gains come from the 1024×1024 resolution, but the experiment compares 100 real images against 100 real plus 2,000 synthetic images, with no control using the same number of real images or lower-resolution synthetic images, so sample size and domain alignment remain alternative explanations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Augmenting 100 real chest X-rays per class with 2,000 synthetic megapixel images raises AUC-ROC and F1 on CheXpert for all six tested findings, with the largest F1 gain (+0.054) for Edema.
  • On MIMIC-CXR, the same synthetic images turn near-zero F1 scores for Lung Opacity, Edema, No Finding, and Pneumothorax into scores of 0.194, 0.336, 0.381, and 0.137 respectively, suggesting synthetic data can help under domain shift.
  • Because the method reuses a pre-trained SDXL and only trains LoRA matrices, reaching 1024×1024 does not require training a new generator from scratch; the same recipe can be copied to other modalities.
  • The progressive upscaling path to 2048×2048 provides a route beyond megapixel scale, with the caveat stated by the authors that extreme upscaling can hallucinate fine structures.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The reported gains may be explained by the twenty-fold increase in training images rather than by resolution, since no control adds 2,000 real images or 2,000 lower-resolution synthetic images; testing those controls would settle whether 1024×1024 is the active ingredient.
  • If resolution is the active ingredient, downstream gains should track a local-detail metric such as edge preservation in the synthetic images; correlating per-sample image quality with per-class F1 improvement is a testable extension the paper does not run.
  • The near-zero MIMIC-CXR baselines suggest the classifier failed to see positive examples at all, so the augmentation may be supplying class presence rather than anatomical fidelity; a synthetic-image dataset with deliberately degraded resolution would separate these effects.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper introduces Pixel Perfect MegaMed, an SDXL-based latent diffusion model fine-tuned with LoRA on CheXpert text-image pairs, and reports 1024x1024 chest X-ray synthesis with optional progressive upscaling to 2048x2048. Generation quality is evaluated with FID and Vendi Score, and the synthetic images are tested as data augmentation for a six-class EfficientNet classifier, comparing 100 real CheXpert images per class against 100 real plus 2,000 synthetic images, on both CheXpert and MIMIC-CXR test sets. The authors claim this is the first vision-language foundation model for 1024x1024 medical image synthesis and that the synthetic images yield measurable classification gains in low-data regimes.

Significance. If the claims are supported, the work would provide a practical recipe for high-resolution chest X-ray synthesis and a benchmark for FID at this scale, and the cross-dataset MIMIC evaluation is a valuable design choice. The planned release of code and weights is a strength. However, the current experimental design does not isolate the resolution or the synthetic-data contribution from a 21x increase in training-set size, and the quality metrics lack baseline comparisons; significance therefore hinges on additional control experiments.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.2, Table 3] The augmentation experiment changes two variables at once: the number of training examples (100 to 2,100) and the image source (real only versus real plus synthetic 1024x1024). Without control arms that add 2,000 real images or 2,000 synthetic images at 256x256 or 512x512 with the same prompts and model, the observed AUC/F1 gains cannot be attributed to high-resolution synthesis; they are equally consistent with a sample-size effect or with generic regularization from any synthetic data. Please add these controls and report standard errors across seeds.
  2. [§3.1, Table 2] The FID and Vendi scores are presented without any baseline method, lower-resolution counterpart, or real-image reference. FID values such as 13.01 are not interpretable in isolation, and the claim that these 'serve as quantitative benchmarks' is unsupported. Report comparisons against at least the existing 256x256 and 512x512 methods and a real-test-set FID, and describe the feature extractor and preprocessing used for the Vendi Score.
  3. [Abstract, §2.2] The abstract and introduction describe a 'multi-scale transformer architecture' designed for ultra-high resolution, but the method section describes fine-tuning the SDXL U-Net with LoRA, with progressive upscaling adapted from DemoFusion. The architectural novelty is not specified, and the abstract's claim of a 'multi-scale transformer' is accordingly unsupported; please either describe the actual multi-scale mechanism or revise the claims.
  4. [§3.2, Table 3] All classification results are reported as single runs, and several differences are small (e.g., CheXpert Lung Opacity F1 from 0.880 to 0.882). Without multiple seeds or statistical testing, the measured gains are not established. Add confidence intervals or significance tests for at least the main augmentation comparisons.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§2.2] The sentence 'For a given attention layer with query/key/value projection matrices M ∈ R^{d×d}' uses a single matrix for Q/K/V, which is not how attention projections are usually defined; clarify that each projection has its own LoRA update.
  2. [§1] The phrase '4 times larger than existing VLM' should specify that 1024x1024 has four times the pixel area of 512x512; the current phrasing is ambiguous.
  3. [Table 1] The column structure conflates the fine-tuning data (real only) with the classification augmentation data (real plus synthetic); relabel the columns to avoid implying the diffusion model was fine-tuned on the augmented set.
  4. [§3.2, MIMIC-CXR] The text does not state how the 100 real MIMIC-CXR images are selected or labeled, nor whether the same CheXpert-trained classifier is evaluated directly; please specify the label extraction and preprocessing for MIMIC-CXR.
  5. [Figure 1] The caption says 'Classifier = No PE' and 'Classifier = PE' but the class whose heatmap is shown for each panel is unclear; label the panels with the predicted class and ground truth.
  6. [References] The OpenCLIP citation (Ilharco et al.) lacks a year; please add the complete citation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation is present: the augmentation gains are empirical outcomes on held-out data, not quantities forced by construction, and the resolution confound is a validity issue rather than circularity.

full rationale

The paper contains no derivation chain that reduces a prediction to its inputs. The method is a fine-tuned SDXL+LoRA generator, and the central evaluation is an empirical augmentation experiment in Table 3 on held-out CheXpert and MIMIC-CXR test sets. Synthetic images are generated from CheXpert label prompts, but the downstream classifier is tested on real held-out images, so the reported classification gains are an independent empirical outcome rather than a quantity forced by construction. The self-citations, such as Kumar et al. (2025) for converting CheXpert labels into text prompts, are methodological or contextual and are not load-bearing because the paper itself describes the prompt-conversion recipe. The FID and Vendi Score evaluations compare synthetic images to real CheXpert test-set features and are self-contained. The main validity concern is that augmenting 100 real images with 2,000 synthetic images changes sample size and data distribution simultaneously, and no low-resolution or real-image control isolates 1024x1024 resolution as the active ingredient; this is an experimental confound, not definitional circularity, and it does not fall within the circularity pass.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on hand-chosen hyperparameters (gamma, augmentation sample counts) and on unvalidated assumptions that text prompts from binary labels and DenseNet features are appropriate. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • SNR weighting gamma = 5.0
    Hand-chosen hyperparameter in the min-SNR loss used during LoRA fine-tuning (Sec 3.1).
  • Number of synthetic images per class for augmentation = 2000
    Experimental design choice that directly affects the augmentation result; the paper does not test sensitivity to this number (Sec 3.1, Table 1).
  • Number of real images per class = 100
    The low-data regime is defined by this hand-picked sample size; results may depend heavily on it (Table 1).
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The text prompt template 'Chest X-ray of a subject with [finding(s)]' built from CheXpert labels is sufficient to condition the model for clinical fidelity.
    The whole method relies on this prompt-to-label mapping; no validation of prompt efficacy is provided (Sec 2.2).
  • domain assumption DenseNet-121 features from TorchXRayVision are a valid feature space for computing FID on chest X-rays.
    FID scores in Table 2 use these features; no evidence that this feature space captures clinical detail (Sec 3.2).
  • domain assumption A standard SDXL U-Net fine-tuned with LoRA is sufficient to preserve global anatomy and local detail at 1024x1024 without architectural modification.
    The abstract claims a 'multi-scale transformer architecture' but the methods use standard SDXL with LoRA (Sec 2.2, Fig 3); the retention of detail is asserted, not demonstrated with a control.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Pixel Perfect MegaMed: A Megapixel-Scale Vision-Language Foundation Model for Generating High Resolution Medical Images." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HG47YH56

@misc{pith2026250712698,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Pixel Perfect MegaMed: A Megapixel-Scale Vision-Language Foundation Model for Generating High Resolution Medical Images},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HG47YH56}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.12698}
}
read the original abstract

Medical image synthesis presents unique challenges due to the inherent complexity and high-resolution details required in clinical contexts. Traditional generative architectures such as Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) or Variational Auto Encoder (VAEs) have shown great promise for high-resolution image generation but struggle with preserving fine-grained details that are key for accurate diagnosis. To address this issue, we introduce Pixel Perfect MegaMed, the first vision-language foundation model to synthesize images at resolutions of 1024x1024. Our method deploys a multi-scale transformer architecture designed specifically for ultra-high resolution medical image generation, enabling the preservation of both global anatomical context and local image-level details. By leveraging vision-language alignment techniques tailored to medical terminology and imaging modalities, Pixel Perfect MegaMed bridges the gap between textual descriptions and visual representations at unprecedented resolution levels. We apply our model to the CheXpert dataset and demonstrate its ability to generate clinically faithful chest X-rays from text prompts. Beyond visual quality, these high-resolution synthetic images prove valuable for downstream tasks such as classification, showing measurable performance gains when used for data augmentation, particularly in low-data regimes. Our code is accessible through the project website - https://tehraninasab.github.io/pixelperfect-megamed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.12698 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Grad-CAM visualization of activation maps in the EfficientNet classifier for pleural effusion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The effect of image resolution on multi-class disease classification performance (Left: AU [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. 2.1 MultiDiffusion: Adapted Latent Diffusion Latent Diffusion Models (LDMs) Rombach et al. [2022] perform diffusion in a learned latent space rather than directly in the high-dimensional pixel space, thus reducing the computational costs while preserving the quality of generated samples. Given a pre-trained autoencoder with an encoder E and decoder D, images x ∈ R H×W×C are first mapped into a lower-dimensional late… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Architecture for high-resolution medical image synthesis using SDXL Podell et al. [2023]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of (left) real samples and (right) synthesized samples at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Progressively scaling an image from 1024 × 1024 to 2048 × 2048. Quantitative Evaluations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Chexplaining in style: Counterfactual explanations for chest x-rays using stylegan

    Matan Atad, Vitalii Dmytrenko, Yitong Li, Xinyue Zhang, Matthias Keicher, Jan Kirschke, Bene Wiestler, Ashkan Khakzar, and Nassir Navab. Chexplaining in style: Counterfactual explanations for chest x-rays using stylegan. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.07553, 2022

    arXiv 2022

  2. [2]

    Multidiffusion: Fusing diffusion paths for controlled image generation

    Omer Bar-Tal, Lior Yariv, Yaron Lipman, and Tali Dekel. Multidiffusion: Fusing diffusion paths for controlled image generation. 2023

    2023

  3. [3]

    Enhancing mr image segmentation with realistic adversarial data augmentation

    Chen Chen, Chen Qin, Cheng Ouyang, Zeju Li, Shuo Wang, Huaqi Qiu, Liang Chen, Giacomo Tarroni, Wenjia Bai, and Daniel Rueckert. Enhancing mr image segmentation with realistic adversarial data augmentation. Medical Image Analysis, 82: 0 102597, 2022

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    A review of medical image data augmentation techniques for deep learning applications

    Phillip Chlap, Hang Min, Nym Vandenberg, Jason Dowling, Lois Holloway, and Annette Haworth. A review of medical image data augmentation techniques for deep learning applications. Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology, 65 0 (5): 0 545--563, 2021

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Torchxrayvision: A library of chest x-ray datasets and models

    Joseph Paul Cohen, Joseph D Viviano, Paul Bertin, Paul Morrison, Parsa Torabian, Matteo Guarrera, Matthew P Lungren, Akshay Chaudhari, Rupert Brooks, Mohammad Hashir, et al. Torchxrayvision: A library of chest x-ray datasets and models. In International Conference on Medical Imaging with Deep Learning, pages 231--249. PMLR, 2022

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Demofusion: Democratising high-resolution image generation with no \ \ \

    Ruoyi Du, Dongliang Chang, Timothy Hospedales, Yi-Zhe Song, and Zhanyu Ma. Demofusion: Democratising high-resolution image generation with no \ \ \ . In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 6159--6168, 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Decodex: Confounder detector guidance for improved diffusion-based counterfactual explanations

    Nima Fathi, Amar Kumar, Brennan Nichyporuk, Mohammad Havaei, and Tal Arbel. Decodex: Confounder detector guidance for improved diffusion-based counterfactual explanations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.09288, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    The vendi score: A diversity evaluation metric for machine learning

    Dan Friedman and Adji Bousso Dieng. The vendi score: A diversity evaluation metric for machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02410, 2022

    arXiv 2022

Show all 30 references
  1. [9]

    Efficient diffusion training via min-snr weighting strategy

    Tiankai Hang, Shuyang Gu, Chen Li, Jianmin Bao, Dong Chen, Han Hu, Xin Geng, and Baining Guo. Efficient diffusion training via min-snr weighting strategy. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 7441--7451, 2023

    2023

  2. [10]

    Effect of image resolution on automated classification of chest x-rays

    Md Inzamam Ul Haque, Abhishek K Dubey, Ioana Danciu, Amy C Justice, Olga S Ovchinnikova, and Jacob D Hinkle. Effect of image resolution on automated classification of chest x-rays. Journal of Medical Imaging, 10 0 (4): 0 044503--044503, 2023

    2023

  3. [11]

    Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium

    Martin Heusel, Hubert Ramsauer, Thomas Unterthiner, Bernhard Nessler, and Sepp Hochreiter. Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    2017

  4. [12]

    Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models

    Edward J Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, Weizhu Chen, et al. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. ICLR, 1 0 (2): 0 3, 2022

    2022

  5. [13]

    Realistic image synthesis of covid-19 chest x-rays using depthwise boundary equilibrium generative adversarial networks

    Zendi Iklima, Trie Maya Kadarina, and Eko Ihsanto. Realistic image synthesis of covid-19 chest x-rays using depthwise boundary equilibrium generative adversarial networks. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 12 0 (5): 0 5444--5454, 2022

    2022

  6. [14]

    Open CLIP , version 0.1, jul

    G Ilharco, M Wortsman, R Wightman, et al. Open CLIP , version 0.1, jul. 2021

    2021

  7. [15]

    Chexpert: A large chest radiograph dataset with uncertainty labels and expert comparison

    Jeremy Irvin, Pranav Rajpurkar, Michael Ko, Yifan Yu, Silviana Ciurea-Ilcus, Chris Chute, Henrik Marklund, Behzad Haghgoo, Robyn Ball, Katie Shpanskaya, et al. Chexpert: A large chest radiograph dataset with uncertainty labels and expert comparison. In Proceedings of the AAAI ...

    2019

  8. [16]

    High-resolution computed tomography with 1,024-matrix for artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis in the evaluation of pulmonary nodules

    Qinling Jiang, Hongbiao Sun, Qi Chen, Yimin Huang, Qingchu Li, Jingyi Tian, Chao Zheng, Xinsheng Mao, Xin’ang Jiang, Yuxin Cheng, et al. High-resolution computed tomography with 1,024-matrix for artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis in the evaluation of pulmon...

    2025

  9. [17]

    Mimic-cxr, a de-identified publicly available database of chest radiographs with free-text reports

    Alistair EW Johnson, Tom J Pollard, Seth J Berkowitz, Nathaniel R Greenbaum, Matthew P Lungren, Chih-ying Deng, Roger G Mark, and Steven Horng. Mimic-cxr, a de-identified publicly available database of chest radiographs with free-text reports. Scientific data, 6 0 (1): 0 317, 2019

    2019

  10. [18]

    Counterfactual image synthesis for discovery of personalized predictive image markers

    Amar Kumar, Anjun Hu, Brennan Nichyporuk, Jean-Pierre R Falet, Douglas L Arnold, Sotirios Tsaftaris, and Tal Arbel. Counterfactual image synthesis for discovery of personalized predictive image markers. In MICCAI Workshop on Medical Image Assisted Blomarkers' Discovery, pages ...

    2022

  11. [19]

    Debiasing counterfactuals in the presence of spurious correlations

    Amar Kumar, Nima Fathi, Raghav Mehta, Brennan Nichyporuk, Jean-Pierre R Falet, Sotirios Tsaftaris, and Tal Arbel. Debiasing counterfactuals in the presence of spurious correlations. In Workshop on Clinical Image-Based Procedures, pages 276--286. Springer, 2023

    2023

  12. [20]

    Prism: High-resolution & precise counterfactual medical image generation using language-guided stable diffusion

    Amar Kumar, Anita Kriz, Mohammad Havaei, and Tal Arbel. Prism: High-resolution & precise counterfactual medical image generation using language-guided stable diffusion. MIDL, 2025

    2025

  13. [21]

    Chest x-ray generation and data augmentation for cardiovascular abnormality classification

    Ali Madani, Mehdi Moradi, Alexandros Karargyris, and Tanveer Syeda-Mahmood. Chest x-ray generation and data augmentation for cardiovascular abnormality classification. In Medical imaging 2018: Image processing, volume 10574, pages 415--420. SPIE, 2018

    2018

  14. [22]

    Ganterfactual—counterfactual explanations for medical non-experts using generative adversarial learning

    Silvan Mertes, Tobias Huber, Katharina Weitz, Alexander Heimerl, and Elisabeth Andr \'e . Ganterfactual—counterfactual explanations for medical non-experts using generative adversarial learning. Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 5: 0 825565, 2022

    2022

  15. [23]

    Influence of field of view size on image quality: ultra-high-resolution ct vs

    Tomo Miyata, Masahiro Yanagawa, Akinori Hata, Osamu Honda, Yuriko Yoshida, Noriko Kikuchi, Mitsuko Tsubamoto, Shinsuke Tsukagoshi, Ayumi Uranishi, and Noriyuki Tomiyama. Influence of field of view size on image quality: ultra-high-resolution ct vs. conventional high-resolution...

    2020

  16. [24]

    Radedit: stress-testing biomedical vision models via diffusion image editing

    Fernando P \'e rez-Garc \' a, Sam Bond-Taylor, Pedro P Sanchez, Boris van Breugel, Daniel C Castro, Harshita Sharma, Valentina Salvatelli, Maria TA Wetscherek, Hannah Richardson, Matthew P Lungren, et al. Radedit: stress-testing biomedical vision models via diffusion image edi...

    2025

  17. [25]

    SDXL : Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis

    Dustin Podell, Zion English, Kyle Lacey, Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Jonas M \"u ller, Joe Penna, and Robin Rombach. SDXL : Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01952, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International conference on machine learning, pa...

    2021

  19. [27]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Bj\"orn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 10684--10695, June 2022

    2022

  20. [28]

    Ct imaging with ultra-high-resolution: Opportunities for cardiovascular imaging in clinical practice

    Joanne D Schuijf, Jo \ a o AC Lima, Kirsten L Boedeker, Hidenobu Takagi, Ryoichi Tanaka, Kunihiro Yoshioka, and Armin Arbab-Zadeh. Ct imaging with ultra-high-resolution: Opportunities for cardiovascular imaging in clinical practice. Journal of cardiovascular computed tomograph...

    2022

  21. [29]

    Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks

    Mingxing Tan and Quoc Le. Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. In International conference on machine learning, pages 6105--6114. PMLR, 2019

    2019

  22. [30]

    Subjective and objective comparisons of image quality between ultra-high-resolution ct and conventional area detector ct in phantoms and cadaveric human lungs

    Masahiro Yanagawa, Akinori Hata, Osamu Honda, Noriko Kikuchi, Tomo Miyata, Ayumi Uranishi, Shinsuke Tsukagoshi, and Noriyuki Tomiyama. Subjective and objective comparisons of image quality between ultra-high-resolution ct and conventional area detector ct in phantoms and cadav...

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.