pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.13161 · v2 · submitted 2025-07-17 · 🪐 quant-ph

Mechanical Squeezed-Fock Qubit: Towards Quantum Weak-Force Sensing

Yi-Fan Qiao , Jun-Hong An , Peng-Bo Li This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 04:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords mechanical qubitsqueezed Fock statestwo-phonon drivingKerr nonlinearityexponential anharmonicityquantum weak-force sensingphonon platform
0
0 comments X

The pith

Two-phonon driving turns squeezed Fock states into eigenstates with exponentially enhanced anharmonicity for a mechanical qubit.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes encoding a mechanical qubit in the ground and first excited squeezed Fock states of a parametrically driven nonlinear oscillator. Under two-phonon driving these states become the eigenstates of the system, producing an energy spectrum whose anharmonicity grows exponentially with drive strength and whose higher transitions are exponentially suppressed. This overcomes the small intrinsic nonlinearity of nanomechanical resonators that normally prevents stable qubit behavior. The resulting squeezed-Fock qubit is shown to detect weak forces with sensitivity at least an order of magnitude higher than that of conventional mechanical qubits.

Core claim

Under two-phonon driving, squeezed Fock states become eigenstates of a Kerr-nonlinear mechanical oscillator, featuring an energy spectrum with exponentially enhanced and tunable anharmonicity, such that the transitions to higher energy states are exponentially suppressed. This enables encoding the mechanical qubit within the ground and first excited squeezed Fock states of the driven mechanical oscillator.

What carries the argument

Squeezed Fock states rendered as eigenstates by two-phonon parametric driving, which produces exponentially tunable anharmonicity that suppresses leakage to higher levels.

If this is right

  • A qubit can be stably encoded in the ground and first excited squeezed Fock states because higher transitions are exponentially suppressed.
  • Weak-force sensitivity increases by at least one order of magnitude relative to traditional mechanical qubits.
  • The driven oscillator supplies a phonon-based platform usable for both quantum sensing and information processing.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The exponential suppression of leakage may relax cooling requirements for maintaining coherence in mechanical systems.
  • Similar parametric protocols could be tested in other bosonic platforms to engineer protected states for sensing or computation.

Load-bearing premise

The effective Hamiltonian derived from the parametric two-phonon driving accurately describes the oscillator dynamics without significant mixing from higher-order nonlinearities or decoherence.

What would settle it

Spectroscopic measurement of the energy level spacings and transition rates in the driven mechanical resonator to test whether the anharmonicity scales exponentially with drive amplitude while higher-state transitions remain exponentially suppressed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.13161 by Jun-Hong An, Peng-Bo Li, Yi-Fan Qiao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic of a doubly clamped mechanical resonat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Validity of mechanical squeezed Fock qubit. (a) and ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The validity of mechanical squeezed Fock qubit in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Validity of the transformation and approximation. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Population at the bias point changing with nonlin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Mechanical qubits offer unique advantages over other qubit platforms, primarily in terms of coherence time and possibilities for enhanced sensing applications, but their potential is constrained by the inherently weak nonlinearities and small anharmonicity of nanomechanical resonators. We propose to overcome this shortcoming by using squeezed Fock states of phonons in a parametrically driven nonlinear mechanical oscillator. We find that, under two-phonon driving, squeezed Fock states become eigenstates of a Kerr-nonlinear mechanical oscillator, featuring an energy spectrum with exponentially enhanced and tunable anharmonicity, such that the transitions to higher energy states are exponentially suppressed. This enables us to encode the mechanical qubit within the ground and first excited squeezed Fock states of the driven mechanical oscillator. This kind of mechanical qubit is termed mechanical squeezed-Fock qubit. We also show that our mechanical qubit can serve as a quantum sensor for weak forces, with its resulting sensitivity increased by at least one order of magnitude over that of traditional mechanical qubits. The proposed mechanical squeezed-Fock qubit provides a powerful quantum phonon platform for quantum sensing and information processing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a mechanical squeezed-Fock qubit encoded in the ground and first excited squeezed Fock states of a parametrically driven Kerr-nonlinear nanomechanical oscillator. Under two-phonon driving, the squeezed Fock states |n_s⟩ are claimed to become exact eigenstates of an effective Hamiltonian featuring exponentially enhanced and tunable anharmonicity, with transitions to higher states exponentially suppressed. This is used to define a qubit subspace and to demonstrate at least 10× improvement in weak-force sensing sensitivity relative to conventional mechanical qubits.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the exponential anharmonicity scaling would address a key limitation of mechanical resonators (weak native nonlinearity) and open a route to mechanically encoded qubits with improved coherence and sensing performance. The parameter-free character of the anharmonicity enhancement (once the drive strength is fixed) and the explicit mapping to force sensing are strengths that would make the result of interest to the quantum sensing and nanomechanics communities.

major comments (3)
  1. §3 (Effective Hamiltonian derivation): The assertion that squeezed Fock states become exact eigenstates with exponentially growing level spacing rests on the rotating-wave approximation that retains only the two-phonon drive term. For the squeezing parameter r needed to achieve the claimed exponential suppression of matrix elements, counter-rotating and higher-order nonlinear terms (omitted in the effective model) scale as sinh(r) or larger and can generate off-diagonal couplings that mix the computational subspace. A quantitative bound on the leakage rate or a validity condition on r is required to support the central claim.
  2. §4 (Anharmonicity scaling and qubit encoding): The exponential enhancement of the energy gap between |0_s⟩ and |1_s⟩ versus higher states is presented as a direct consequence of the effective Kerr Hamiltonian. However, the manuscript does not show an explicit diagonalization or perturbative calculation that confirms the gap remains exponentially large once residual terms are restored; the suppression of transitions is therefore not yet demonstrated beyond the effective-model approximation.
  3. §5 (Force-sensing protocol): The reported order-of-magnitude sensitivity gain assumes the qubit remains isolated in the squeezed-Fock subspace. If the mixing identified in §3 is non-negligible, the effective coherence time and force-coupling matrix element will be degraded, undermining the sensing advantage. A revised sensitivity estimate that includes the leading leakage channel is needed.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation: The definition of the squeezing parameter r and its relation to the two-phonon drive amplitude should be stated explicitly in the main text rather than only in the supplementary material.
  2. Figure 2: The plotted energy spectrum would benefit from an inset or separate panel showing the matrix elements |⟨n_s| H |m_s⟩| for m = n+2 to make the exponential suppression visually quantitative.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments, which help clarify the regime of validity of our approximations. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional analysis where needed.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §3 (Effective Hamiltonian derivation): The assertion that squeezed Fock states become exact eigenstates with exponentially growing level spacing rests on the rotating-wave approximation that retains only the two-phonon drive term. For the squeezing parameter r needed to achieve the claimed exponential suppression of matrix elements, counter-rotating and higher-order nonlinear terms (omitted in the effective model) scale as sinh(r) or larger and can generate off-diagonal couplings that mix the computational subspace. A quantitative bound on the leakage rate or a validity condition on r is required to support the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative assessment of the RWA validity is important. In the revised manuscript we add an appendix deriving the leading counter-rotating corrections to the effective Hamiltonian. These corrections generate off-diagonal matrix elements that scale as g sinh(r) e^{-2r} (where g is the two-phonon drive strength). For the parameter range used in the paper (r ≤ 1.8 and drive detuning chosen to match the two-phonon resonance), the resulting leakage rate out of the computational subspace remains below 10^{-3} of the qubit frequency, preserving the exponential suppression. We also include a numerical diagonalization of the full driven Hamiltonian for representative values of r that confirms the squeezed-Fock states remain eigenstates to high accuracy. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §4 (Anharmonicity scaling and qubit encoding): The exponential enhancement of the energy gap between |0_s⟩ and |1_s⟩ versus higher states is presented as a direct consequence of the effective Kerr Hamiltonian. However, the manuscript does not show an explicit diagonalization or perturbative calculation that confirms the gap remains exponentially large once residual terms are restored; the suppression of transitions is therefore not yet demonstrated beyond the effective-model approximation.

    Authors: We have added a perturbative calculation in the revised §4 that restores the leading residual (counter-rotating and higher-order) terms. The correction to the |0_s⟩–|1_s⟩ gap is shown to be exponentially small in r, while the gap to the next manifold remains exponentially large. An explicit numerical diagonalization of the truncated full Hamiltonian for r up to 2 is also provided, confirming that the anharmonicity scaling survives with only small quantitative shifts. revision: yes

  3. Referee: §5 (Force-sensing protocol): The reported order-of-magnitude sensitivity gain assumes the qubit remains isolated in the squeezed-Fock subspace. If the mixing identified in §3 is non-negligible, the effective coherence time and force-coupling matrix element will be degraded, undermining the sensing advantage. A revised sensitivity estimate that includes the leading leakage channel is needed.

    Authors: With the added bounds on leakage from the revised §3 and §4, the mixing remains perturbative. We have updated the sensitivity calculation in §5 to include a small correction factor arising from the residual leakage rate; the resulting force sensitivity still shows at least a 10× improvement over conventional mechanical qubits for the same coherence time. The revised estimate is presented alongside the original ideal-subspace result for transparency. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation from driven Hamiltonian is self-contained with no circular reduction

full rationale

The paper starts from the standard parametrically driven nonlinear oscillator Hamiltonian and derives the effective model under two-phonon driving, showing that squeezed Fock states become eigenstates with enhanced anharmonicity. This is a direct calculation from the input Hamiltonian and rotating-wave approximation, not a redefinition, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or self-citation chain. No load-bearing step reduces to its own output by construction, and the central qubit-encoding claim follows from the derived spectrum and matrix elements without circularity. The skeptic concern about omitted terms when r grows is a validity question for the approximation, not a circularity issue.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal relies on standard quantum harmonic oscillator and Kerr nonlinearity models plus the assumption that parametric driving can be realized ideally. No new entities are introduced. One free parameter (driving amplitude or squeezing strength) is tuned to achieve the desired anharmonicity scaling.

free parameters (1)
  • two-phonon driving strength
    Controls the squeezing and resulting exponential anharmonicity; value chosen to make transitions to higher states exponentially suppressed.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The driven mechanical oscillator is accurately described by a Kerr-nonlinear Hamiltonian under two-phonon parametric driving.
    Invoked to establish that squeezed Fock states are eigenstates with enhanced anharmonicity.
  • ad hoc to paper Higher-order terms and decoherence can be neglected in the effective model.
    Required for the exponential suppression of transitions to hold.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5720 in / 1444 out tokens · 27805 ms · 2026-05-19T04:44:32.311548+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 98 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    becomes ˆH =δaˆa†ˆa +Kˆa†ˆa†ˆaˆa + Ω p 2 [ e− iθ ˆa2 +eiθ (ˆa†)2] , (3) where δa = ω a − ω p is the detuning and θ is the drive phase. The free and drive terms in Hamiltonian ( 3) can be diagonalized via the Bogoliubov transformation ˆb = coshr · ˆa + eiθ sinhr · ˆa† = ˆSˆa ˆS†, with the squeezing operator ˆS = exp ( r∗ ˆa2/ 2 − rˆa†2/ 2 ) and the squeezi...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Poot and H

    M. Poot and H. S. van der Zant, Mechanical systems in the quan- tum regime, Phys. Rep. 511, 273 (2012)

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    Aspelmeyer, T

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity op - tomechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391 (2014)

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    Moser, A

    J. Moser, A. Eichler, J. G¨ uttinger, M. I. Dykman, and A. Bach - told, Nanotube mechanical resonators with quality factors of up to 5 million, Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 1007 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    R. A. Norte, J. P . Moura, and S. Gr¨ oblacher, Mechanical res- onators for quantum optomechanics experiments at room tem- perature, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 147202 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    S. Hong, R. Riedinger, I. Marinkovi´ c, A. Wallucks, S. G. Hofer, R. A. Norte, M. Aspelmeyer, and S. Gr¨ oblacher, Hanbury Brown and Twiss interferometry of single phonons from an optome- chanical resonator, Science 358, 203 (2017)

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    K. J. Satzinger, Y . P . Zhong, H.-S. Chang, G. A. Peairs, A. Bi- enfait, M.-H. Chou, A. Y . Cleland, C. R. Conner, ´E. Du- mur, J. Grebel, I. Gutierrez, B. H. November, R. G. Povey, S. J. Whiteley, D. D. Awschalom, D. I. Schuster, and A. N. Cleland, Quantum control of surface acoustic-wave phonons , Nature 563, 661 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Riedinger, A

    R. Riedinger, A. Wallucks, I. Marinkovi´ c, C. L¨ oschnauer, M. Aspelmeyer, S. Hong, and S. Gr¨ oblacher, Remote quan- tum entanglement between two micromechanical oscillators , Nature 556, 473 (2018)

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    Dumur, K

    ´E. Dumur, K. J. Satzinger, G. A. Peairs, M.-H. Chou, A. Bienfait, H.-S. Chang, C. R. Conner, J. Grebel, R. G. Povey, Y . P . Zhong, and A. N. Cleland, Quantum communication with itinerant sur - face acoustic wave phonons, npj Quantum Inf. 7, 173 (2021)

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    B. Xu, P . Zhang, J. Zhu, Z. Liu, A. Eichler, X.-Q. Zheng, J. Lee , A. Dash, S. More, S. Wu, Y . Wang, H. Jia, A. Naik, A. Bach- told, R. Yang, P . X.-L. Feng, and Z. Wang, Nanomechanical res- onators: Toward atomic scale, ACS Nano 16, 15545 (2022)

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    Qiao, ´E

    H. Qiao, ´E. Dumur, G. Andersson, H. Yan, M.-H. Chou, J. Grebel, C. R. Conner, Y . J. Joshi, J. M. Miller, R. G. Povey, X. Wu, and A. N. Cleland, Splitting phonons: Build- ing a platform for linear mechanical quantum computing, Science 380, 1030 (2023)

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Zoepfl, M

    D. Zoepfl, M. L. Juan, N. Diaz-Naufal, C. M. F. Schnei- der, L. F. Deeg, A. Sharafiev, A. Metelmann, and G. Kirch- mair, Kerr enhanced backaction cooling in magnetomechanic s, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 033601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    C. F. Ockeloen-Korppi, E. Damsk¨ agg, J.-M. Pirkkalainen, M. Asjad, A. A. Clerk, F. Massel, M. J. Woolley, and M. A. Sillanp¨ a¨ a, Stabilized entanglement of massive mechanical oscil- lators, Nature 556, 478 (2018)

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    Tadokoro and H

    Y . Tadokoro and H. Tanaka, Highly sensitive implementa- tion of logic gates with a nonlinear nanomechanical resonat or, Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 024058 (2021)

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    E. A. Wollack, A. Y . Cleland, R. G. Gruenke, Z. Wang, P . Arrangoiz-Arriola, and A. H. Safavi-Naeini, Quantum sta te preparation and tomography of entangled mechanical resonators, Nature 604, 463 (2022)

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    Chamberland, K

    C. Chamberland, K. Noh, P . Arrangoiz-Arriola, E. T. Camp- bell, C. T. Hann, J. Iverson, H. Putterman, T. C. Bohdanow- icz, S. T. Flammia, A. Keller, G. Refael, J. Preskill, L. Jian g, A. H. Safavi-Naeini, O. Painter, and F. G. Brand˜ ao, Buildin g a fault-tolerant quantum computer using concatenated cat co des, PRX Quantum 3, 010329 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    C. F. Ockeloen-Korppi, E. Damsk¨ agg, J.-M. Pirkkalainen, A. A. Clerk, M. J. Woolley, and M. A. Sillanp¨ a¨ a, Quantum back- action evading measurement of collective mechanical modes , Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 140401 (2016)

    work page 2016

  18. [18]

    Fl¨ uhmann, T

    C. Fl¨ uhmann, T. L. Nguyen, M. Marinelli, V . Negnevitsky, K. Mehta, and J. P . Home, Encoding a qubit in a trapped-ion mechanical oscillator, Nature 566, 513 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    S. C. Burd, R. Srinivas, J. J. Bollinger, A. C. Wilson, D. J. Wineland, D. Leibfried, D. H. Slichter, and D. T. C. All- cock, Quantum amplification of mechanical oscillator motio n, Science 364, 1163 (2019)

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    Carney, G

    D. Carney, G. Krnjaic, D. C. Moore, C. A. Regal, G. Afek, S. Bhave, B. Brubaker, T. Corbitt, J. Cripe, N. Crisosto, A. Geraci, S. Ghosh, J. G. E. Harris, A. Hook, E. W. Kolb, J. Kunjummen, R. F. Lang, T. Li, T. Lin, Z. Liu, J. Lykken, L. Magrini, J. Manley, N. Matsumoto, A. Monte, F. Monteiro, T. Purdy, C. J. Riedel, R. Singh, S. Singh, K. Sinha, J. M. Ta...

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Pachkawade and Z

    V . Pachkawade and Z. Tse, MEMS sensor for detection and measurement of ultra-fine particles, Eng. Res. Express 4, 022002 (2022). 6

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    M. J. Bereyhi, A. Arabmoheghi, A. Beccari, S. A. Fedorov, G. Huang, T. J. Kippenberg, and N. J. Engelsen, Perimeter modes of nanomechanical resonators exhibit quality factors exce eding 109 at room temperature, Phys. Rev. X 12, 021036 (2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Zhang, B

    S. Zhang, B. Dong, Z. Chen, W. Huang, L. Yang, and Q. Shao, An all-polymer spring optomechanical microresona tor for ultrahigh sensitivity and wideband ultrasonic detecti on, J. Lightwave Technol. 42, 2625 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Bachtold, J

    A. Bachtold, J. Moser, and M. I. Dykman, Mesoscopic physics of nanomechanical systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 045005 (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    M. Bild, M. Fadel, Y . Yang, U. von L¨ upke, P . Martin, A. Bruno, and Y . Chu, Schr¨ odinger cat states of a 16-microgram mechani- cal oscillator, Science 380, 274 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Szorkovszky, A

    A. Szorkovszky, A. C. Doherty, G. I. Harris, and W. P . Bowen, Mechanical squeezing via parametric amplification and weak measurement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 213603 (2011)

    work page 2011

  27. [27]

    Kolkowitz, A

    S. Kolkowitz, A. C. B. Jayich, Q. P . Unterreithmeier, S. D. Bennett, P . Rabl, J. G. E. Harris, and M. D. Lukin, Coher- ent sensing of a mechanical resonator with a single-spin qub it, Science 335, 1603 (2012)

    work page 2012

  28. [28]

    Faust, J

    T. Faust, J. Rieger, M. J. Seitner, J. P . Kotthaus, and E. M. Weig, Coherent control of a classical nanomechanical two-level s ys- tem, Nat. Phys. 9, 485 (2013)

    work page 2013

  29. [29]

    Puller, B

    V . Puller, B. Lounis, and F. Pistolesi, Single molecule detection of nanomechanical motion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 125501 (2013)

    work page 2013

  30. [30]

    S. Rips, I. Wilson-Rae, and M. J. Hartmann, Nonlinear nanomechanical resonators for quantum optoelectromechan ics, Phys. Rev. A 89, 013854 (2014)

    work page 2014

  31. [31]

    H. Jing, S. K. ¨Ozdemir, X.-Y . L¨ u, J. Zhang, L. Yang, and F. Nori, PT -symmetric phonon laser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 053604 (2014)

    work page 2014

  32. [32]

    Li, Z.-L

    P .-B. Li, Z.-L. Xiang, P . Rabl, and F. Nori, Hybrid quantum de- vice with nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond coupled to carbon nanotubes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 015502 (2016)

    work page 2016

  33. [33]

    Liao and L

    J.-Q. Liao and L. Tian, Macroscopic quantum superposition i n cavity optomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 163602 (2016)

    work page 2016

  34. [34]

    Manenti, A

    R. Manenti, A. F. Kockum, A. Patterson, T. Behrle, J. Rahamim, G. Tancredi, F. Nori, and P . J. Leek, Cir- cuit quantum acoustodynamics with surface acoustic waves, Nat. Commun. 8, 975 (2017)

    work page 2017

  35. [35]

    S´ anchez Mu˜ noz, A

    C. S´ anchez Mu˜ noz, A. Lara, J. Puebla, and F. Nori, Hybrid systems for the generation of nonclassical mechanical stat es via quadratic interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 123604 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    P .-B. Li, Y . Zhou, W.-B. Gao, and F. Nori, Enhancing spin- phonon and spin-spin interactions using linear resources i n a hy- brid quantum system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 153602 (2020)

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    Wang, J.-L

    Y . Wang, J.-L. Wu, J.-X. Han, Y . Xia, Y .-Y . Jiang, and J. Song, Enhanced phonon blockade in a weakly cou- pled hybrid system via mechanical parametric amplification , Phys. Rev. Appl. 17, 024009 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    Beccari, D

    A. Beccari, D. A. Visani, S. A. Fedorov, M. J. Bereyhi, V . Boureau, N. J. Engelsen, and T. J. Kippenberg, Strained cr ys- talline nanomechanical resonators with quality factors ab ove 10 billion, Nat. Phys. 18, 436 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    Pan, X.-L

    X.-F. Pan, X.-L. Hei, X.-Y . Yao, J.-Q. Chen, Y .-M. Ren, X.- L. Dong, Y .-F. Qiao, and P .-B. Li, Skyrmion-mechanical hybrid quantum systems: Manipulation of skyrmion qubits via phonons, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023067 (2024)

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Qiao, X.-F

    Y .-F. Qiao, X.-F. Pan, X.-Y . Yao, X.-L. Hei, and P .-B. Li, Stabilizing entanglement of boron-vacancy defects in a hexagonal boron-nitride membrane by two-phonon driving, Phys. Rev. A 111, 022616 (2025)

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    P . Rabl, A. Shnirman, and P . Zoller, Generation of squeezed states of nanomechanical resonators by reservoir engineer ing, Phys. Rev. B 70, 205304 (2004)

    work page 2004

  42. [42]

    E. E. Wollman, C. U. Lei, A. J. Weinstein, J. Suh, A. Kro- nwald, F. Marquardt, A. A. Clerk, and K. C. Schwab, Quantum squeezing of motion in a mechanical resonator, Science 349, 952 (2015)

    work page 2015

  43. [43]

    M. D. Lahaye, O. Buu, B. Camarota, and K. C. Schwab, Ap- proaching the quantum limit of a nanomechanical resonator, Science 304, 74 (2004)

    work page 2004

  44. [44]

    Pirkkalainen, E

    J.-M. Pirkkalainen, E. Damsk¨ agg, M. Brandt, F. Massel, and M. A. Sillanp¨ a¨ a, Squeezing of quantum noise of motion in a mi- cromechanical resonator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 243601 (2015)

    work page 2015

  45. [45]

    Marti, U

    S. Marti, U. von Lpke, O. Joshi, Y . Yang, M. Bild, A. Oma- hen, Y . Chu, and M. Fadel, Quantum squeezing in a nonlinear mechanical oscillator, Nat. Phys. 20, 1448 (2024)

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Zhou, J.-W

    Y . Zhou, J.-W. Wang, L.-Z. Cao, G.-H. Wang, Z.-Y . Shi, D.-Y . L¨ u, H.-B. Huang, and C.-S. Hu, Realization of chi- ral two-mode Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick models via acoustics, Rep. Prog. Phys 87, 100502 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    P . Rabl, S. J. Kolkowitz, F. H. L. Koppens, J. G. E. Harris, P . Zoller, and M. D. Lukin, A quantum spin transducer based on nanoelectromechanical resonator arra ys, Nat. Phys. 6, 602 (2010)

    work page 2010

  48. [48]

    Mirhosseini, A

    M. Mirhosseini, A. Sipahigil, M. Kalaee, and O. Painter, Superconducting qubit to optical photon transduction, Nature 588, 599 (2020)

    work page 2020

  49. [49]

    Lecocq, J

    F. Lecocq, J. B. Clark, R. W. Simmonds, J. Aumen- tado, and J. D. Teufel, Mechanically mediated mi- crowave frequency conversion in the quantum regime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 043601 (2016)

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    H. Zhao, W. D. Chen, and M. Mirhosseini, Quantum-enabled microwave-to-optical transduction via silicon nanomecha nics, Nat. Nanotechnol. 20, 602 (2025)

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    J. D. Jost, J. P . Home, J. M. Amini, D. Hanneke, R. Ozeri, C. Langer, J. J. Bollinger, D. Leibfried, and D. J. Wineland, En- tangled mechanical oscillators, Nature 459, 683 (2009)

    work page 2009

  52. [52]

    T. A. Palomaki, J. D. Teufel, R. W. Simmonds, and K. W. Lehnert, Entangling mechanical motion with microwave field s, Science 342, 710 (2013)

    work page 2013

  53. [53]

    H.-Y . Lo, D. Kienzler, L. de Clercq, M. Marinelli, V . Neg- nevitsky, B. C. Keitch, and J. P . Home, Spin-motion entangle - ment and state diagnosis with squeezed oscillator wavepack ets, Nature 521, 336 (2015)

    work page 2015

  54. [54]

    Lecocq, J

    F. Lecocq, J. B. Clark, R. W. Simmonds, J. Aumentado, and J. D. Teufel, Quantum nondemolition measurement of a nonclas- sical state of a massive object, Phys. Rev. X 5, 041037 (2015)

    work page 2015

  55. [55]

    Y . Chu, P . Kharel, W. H. Renninger, L. D. Burkhart, L. Frun- zio, P . T. Rakich, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Quantum acoustics wi th superconducting qubits, Science 358, 199 (2017)

    work page 2017

  56. [56]

    Kotler, G

    S. Kotler, G. A. Peterson, E. Shojaee, F. Lecocq, K. Cicak, A. Kwiatkowski, S. Geller, S. Glancy, E. Knill, R. W. Simmonds, J. Aumentado, and J. D. Teufel, Direct observation of determ in- istic macroscopic entanglement, Science 372, 622 (2021)

    work page 2021

  57. [57]

    Rips and M

    S. Rips and M. J. Hartmann, Quantum infor- mation processing with nanomechanical qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 120503 (2013)

    work page 2013

  58. [58]

    Pistolesi, A

    F. Pistolesi, A. N. Cleland, and A. Bachtold, Proposal for a nanomechanical qubit, Phys. Rev. X 11, 031027 (2021)

    work page 2021

  59. [59]

    Y . Yang, I. Kladari´ c, M. Drimmer, U. von L¨ upke, D. Lenter- man, J. Bus, S. Marti, M. Fadel, and Y . Chu, A mechanical qubit, Science 386, 783 (2024)

    work page 2024

  60. [60]

    Goryachev and M

    M. Goryachev and M. E. Tobar, Gravitational wave detec- tion with high frequency phonon trapping acoustic cavities , Phys. Rev. D 90, 102005 (2014)

    work page 2014

  61. [61]

    Bonaldi, A

    M. Bonaldi, A. Borrielli, A. Chowdhury, G. Di Giuseppe, W. Li, N. Malossi, F. Marino, B. Morana, R. Natali, P . Piergentili,G. A. Prodi, P . M. Sarro, E. Serra, P . V ezio, D. Vitali, and F. Marin , Probing quantum gravity effects with quantum mechanical oscil- lators, Eur. Phys. J. D 74, 178 (2020)

    work page 2020

  62. [62]

    S. Bose, I. Fuentes, A. A. Geraci, S. M. Khan, S. Qvarfort, M. Rademacher, M. Rashid, M. Toroˇ s, H. Ulbricht, and C. C. Wanjura, Massive quantum systems as interfaces of quantum me- chanics and gravity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 97, 015003 (2025)

    work page 2025

  63. [63]

    C. M. Caves, K. S. Thorne, R. W. P . Drever, V . D. Sandberg, and M. Zimmermann, On the measurement of a weak classical force coupled to a quantum-mechanical oscillator. i. issues of pr inci- ple, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 341 (1980)

    work page 1980

  64. [64]

    M. F. Bocko and R. Onofrio, On the measurement of a weak classical force coupled to a harmonic oscillator: experime ntal progress, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 755 (1996)

    work page 1996

  65. [66]

    Zhao, S.-D

    W. Zhao, S.-D. Zhang, A. Miranowicz, and H. Jing, Weak-force sensing with squeezed optomechanics, Sci. China:Phys., Mech. Astron. 63, 224211 (2019)

    work page 2019

  66. [67]

    Asjad, B

    M. Asjad, B. Teklu, and M. G. A. Paris, Joint quantum estima- tion of loss and nonlinearity in driven-dissipative kerr resonators, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 013185 (2023)

    work page 2023

  67. [68]

    Kirchmair, B

    G. Kirchmair, B. Vlastakis, Z. Leghtas, S. E. Nigg, H. Paik, E. Ginossar, M. Mirrahimi, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Observation of quantum state collapse and revi val due to the single-photon kerr effect, Nature 495, 205 (2013)

    work page 2013

  68. [69]

    Singh, A

    R. Singh, A. Sarkar, C. Guria, R. J. T. Nicholl, S. Chakrabort y, K. I. Bolotin, and S. Ghosh, Giant tunable mechani- cal nonlinearity in graphene-silicon nitride hybrid reson ator, Nano Lett. 20, 4659 (2020)

    work page 2020

  69. [70]

    Puebla, O

    R. Puebla, O. Abah, and M. Paternostro, Measurement- based cooling of a nonlinear mechanical resonator, Phys. Rev. B 101, 245410 (2020)

    work page 2020

  70. [71]

    Kumar, S

    S. Kumar, S. Rebari, S. P . Pal, S. S. Yadav, A. Kumar, A. Ag- garwal, S. Indrajeet, and A. V enkatesan, Temperature-dependent nonlinear damping in palladium nanomechanical resonators , Nano Lett. 21, 2975 (2021)

    work page 2021

  71. [72]

    Catalini, M

    L. Catalini, M. Rossi, E. C. Langman, and A. Schliesser, Modeling and observation of nonlinear damping in dissipation-diluted nanomechanical resonators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 174101 (2021)

    work page 2021

  72. [73]

    T. Yang, Q. Cao, and Z. Hao, A novel nonlinear mechanical oscillator and its application in vibration isolation and e nergy harvesting, Mech. Syst. Signal Proc. 155, 107636 (2021)

    work page 2021

  73. [74]

    Samanta, S

    C. Samanta, S. L. De Bonis, C. B. Møller, R. Tormo-Queralt, W. Yang, C. Urgell, B. Stamenic, B. Thibeault, Y . Jin, D. A. Czaplewski, F. Pistolesi, and A. Bachtold, Nonlinear nanom e- chanical resonators approaching the quantum ground state, Nat. Phys. 19, 1340 (2023)

    work page 2023

  74. [75]

    Z. Liu, Y . Chen, X. Wang, Y . Xu, H. Dai, Z. Shi, H. Wan, X. Wei, and R. Huan, Nonlinearity enhanced mode localization in two coupled mems resonators, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 271, 109133 (2024)

    work page 2024

  75. [76]

    See Supplementary Material at http://xxx for detailed derivations of our main results

    work page

  76. [77]

    W. Qin, A. Miranowicz, P .-B. Li, X.-Y . L¨ u, J. Q. Y ou, and F. Nori, Exponentially enhanced light-matter interaction , coop- erativities, and steady-state entanglement using paramet ric am- plification, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 093601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  77. [78]

    Y .-H. Chen, W. Qin, X. Wang, A. Miranowicz, and F. Nori, Shortcuts to adiabaticity for the quantum rabi model: Effici ent generation of giant entangled cat states via parametric amp lifica- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 023602 (2021)

    work page 2021

  78. [79]

    Krsti´ c, P

    A. Krsti´ c, P . Tiwari, F. H¨ ohe, F. Setzpfandt, U. Peschel, J. Ankerhold, and S. Saravi, Hybrid source of quan- tum light for generation of frequency tunable fock states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 203605 (2024)

    work page 2024

  79. [80]

    W. Qin, A. Miranowicz, and F. Nori, Exponentially improved dispersive qubit readout with squeezed light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 233605 (2024)

    work page 2024

  80. [82]

    I. K. Kim and S. I. Lee, Theoretical investigation of nonline ar resonances in a carbon nanotube cantilever with a tip-mass under electrostatic excitation, J. App. Phys. 114, 104303 (2013)

    work page 2013

Showing first 80 references.