Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 31 references

Precise Measurement of $^{216}$Po Half-life with Exact Parent-daughter Pairing in PandaX-4T

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read PandaX-4T reports the most precise 216Po half-life, 143.7 ± 0.5 ms.

desk verdict A clean, well-executed half-life measurement whose claimed precision holds up; the reader's main worry about the 3.4% multi-match removal turns out to be a red herring. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.13241 v1 pith:MI6O4TVL submitted 2025-07-17 nucl-ex hep-ex

PandaX Collaboration: Chenxiang Li , Zihao Bo , Wei Chen , Xun Chen , Yunhua Chen , Chen Cheng , Xiangyi Cui , Manna Deng
show 102 more authors
Yingjie Fan Deqing Fang Xuanye Fu Zhixing Gao Yujie Ge Lisheng Geng Karl Giboni Xunan Guo Xuyuan Guo Zichao Guo Chencheng Han Ke Han Changda He Jinrong He Houqi Huang Junting Huang Yule Huang Ruquan Hou Xiangdong Ji Yonglin Ju Xiaorun Lan Jiafu Li Mingchuan Li Peiyuan Li Shuaijie Li Tao Li Yangdong Li Zhiyuan Li Qing Lin Jianglai Liu Yuanchun Liu Congcong Lu Xiaoying Lu Lingyin Luo Yunyang Luo Yugang Ma Yajun Mao Yue Meng Binyu Pang Ningchun Qi Zhicheng Qian Xiangxiang Ren Dong Shan Xiaofeng Shang Xiyuan Shao Guofang Shen Manbin Shen Wenliang Sun Xuyan Sun Yi Tao Yueqiang Tian Yuxin Tian Anqing Wang Guanbo Wang Hao Wang Haoyu Wang Jiamin Wang Lei Wang Meng Wang Qiuhong Wang Shaobo Wang Shibo Wang Siguang Wang Wei Wang Xu Wang Zhou Wang Yuehuan Wei Weihao Wu Yuan Wu Mengjiao Xiao Xiang Xiao Kaizhi Xiong Jianqin Xu Yifan Xu Shunyu Yao Binbin Yan Xiyu Yan Yong Yang Peihua Ye Chunxu Yu Ying Yuan Zhe Yuan Youhui Yun Xinning Zeng Minzhen Zhang Peng Zhang Shibo Zhang Siyuan Zhang Shu Zhang Tao Zhang Wei Zhang Yang Zhang Yingxin Zhang Yuanyuan Zhang Li Zhao Kangkang Zhao Jifang Zhou Jiaxu Zhou Jiayi Zhou Ning Zhou Xiaopeng Zhou Zhizhen Zhou Chenhui Zhu
This is my paper
classification nucl-exhep-ex
keywords 216Pohalf-lifeexactparent-daughterpairingliquidxenonTPC5Dcalorimeterthorium-228decaychainalphaPandaX-4Tradoncalibration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports a measurement of the half-life of 216Po, an alpha-emitting nucleus in the thorium-228 decay chain, using the PandaX-4T liquid xenon time projection chamber. The detector records time, energy, and three-dimensional position for each decay, which lets the authors pair each 220Rn parent with its 216Po daughter and read off the daughter's lifetime directly from the time difference. From 98,948 such pairs, they fit a half-life of 143.7 ± 0.5 (stat.) ± 0.2 (syst.) ms, the most precise value to date, and it agrees with earlier measurements. A sympathetic reader would care because the same exact-pairing technique could be used for other short-lived alpha emitters and for mapping convection and backgrounds inside liquid xenon detectors.

What carries the argument

The central object is the 5D calorimeter: each decay is timestamped by its S1 scintillation pulse and located in three dimensions by the S2 electroluminescence pattern, giving time, energy, and x-y-z position. Exact Rn-Po pairing uses energy cuts split by vertical position to tag 220Rn and 216Po, a fiducial-volume cut on 220Rn to avoid daughters escaping the detector, a 3-second maximum time separation, and spatial proximity of 1.5 cm vertically and 5 cm horizontally. The lifetime is extracted by a binned maximum-likelihood fit of the 98,948 measured Rn-Po time differences to an exponential plus a constant background.

What would settle it

Re-fit the same data with a likelihood that includes all 216Po candidates rather than discarding the 3.4% multi-match events; if the fitted half-life moves by more than roughly 0.5 ms, the quoted central value and its systematic error need revision.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using 35.4 hours of 220Rn-216Po calibration data, the authors identify 98,948 parent-daughter pairs and extract each 216Po lifetime from the time between the 220Rn and 216Po alpha signals. They fit the lifetime distribution to an exponential plus a flat background and obtain 143.7 ms with a 0.5 ms statistical uncertainty and a 0.2 ms systematic uncertainty from data selection, fiducial volume, pairing cuts, and fit procedure. The paper claims this is the most precise 216Po half-life measurement to date, improving on prior underground-experiment results by factors of about 20 and 5.6 and consistent with the previous dedicated silicon-detector value of 144.0 ± 0.6 ms. Combining their value with prior results gives a new average half-life of 144.0 ± 0.4 ms.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis throws away the 3.4% of 220Rn events with multiple 216Po candidates and assumes those ambiguous cases have the same lifetime distribution as the rest, even though long-lived 216Po nuclei have more time for unrelated decays to appear in the pairing window.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The 216Po half-life is known to 0.54 ms total uncertainty, roughly a factor of 20 better than one earlier underground measurement and 5.6 times better than another.
  • Combining with previous values yields a world average of 144.0 ± 0.4 ms, tightening nuclear data used in decay-chain and background modeling.
  • The same 5D pairing can tag 212Bi-208Tl pairs to measure the roughly 3-minute 208Tl half-life from existing 220Rn calibration data.
  • Rn-Po pairing can reconstruct liquid xenon convection over the meter scale and validate position reconstruction.
  • Tagging radon-induced backgrounds by exact pairing can suppress them in dark matter and rare-event searches.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the multi-match removal is unbiased, the method should generalize to any short-lived alpha emitter whose parent and daughter are both detectable; the limiting precision is set by statistics and pairing ambiguity, not by detector energy resolution.
  • The 3.4% discarded multi-match set is worth a dedicated check: if it is enriched in long lifetimes, the central value could shift by more than the quoted systematic, and the most-precise claim would require a likelihood that uses all matches.
  • A testable extension is to apply the same exact-pairing pipeline to 222Rn-218Po and 218Po-214Pb pairs in the same detector, producing independent half-life measurements of 218Po and 214Pb from the same data set.
  • The technique effectively turns a dark-matter calibration dataset into a nuclear-physics measurement, suggesting other calibration campaigns could be mined for decay half-lives without dedicated beam time.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a measurement of the 216Po half-life using the PandaX-4T liquid xenon TPC. From 35.4 hours of calibration data with an internal 220Rn source, the authors identify 98,948 220Rn-216Po parent-daughter pairs using energy, timing, and 3D position information, and fit the distribution of decay-time intervals with an exponential plus a flat background. They obtain 143.7 +/- 0.5 (stat) +/- 0.2 (syst) ms, and quote this as the most precise 216Po half-life to date, consistent with previous measurements. Systematic uncertainties are evaluated by varying energy-selection windows, fiducial-volume boundaries, pairing proximity cuts, and fit settings.

Significance. If correct, this is the most precise 216Po half-life measurement to date, with a total uncertainty near 0.54 ms, and it agrees with the previously published values. The result demonstrates that a large dual-phase LXe TPC can serve as a high-resolution 5D calorimeter for nuclear-decay studies, and the exact parent-daughter pairing technique is a useful capability for background tagging and convection studies. The paper is creditable for its large paired sample, the explicitly reported systematic checks on the main cuts and fit choices, and its straightforward, appropriate statistical model. The only substantive technical question concerns the removal of 3.4% of 220Rn candidates with multiple 216Po matches; as discussed below, this removal is in fact lifetime-independent under the paper's fixed-window Poisson background assumption, so it does not bias the central result, but the manuscript should state this reasoning explicitly.

minor comments (5)
  1. [Rn-Po pairing and multi-match removal] The removal of the 3.4% of 220Rn candidates with multiple 216Po matches is stated without an explicit demonstration that it does not bias the lifetime distribution. The concern is benign: with a fixed 3-s pairing window and a stationary accidental-candidate rate, the number of unrelated 216Po candidates is Poisson with a mean independent of the true daughter decay time, so the rejection acts as an unbiased subsampling. Please add this argument, or alternatively a cross-check that assigns multi-match events by closest distance and by minimum time and refits, so that the safety of the cut is evident to the reader.
  2. [Systematics, Table 1, data selection] The data-selection systematic varies only the 220Rn energy window (E0 +/- 1 sigma to E0 +/- 3 sigma). Please state explicitly whether the 216Po energy selection was varied analogously; if the 216Po peak is sufficiently isolated that this is unnecessary, a sentence saying so would remove ambiguity.
  3. [Title and summary] The term 'exact' parent-daughter pairing overstates the procedure, since 3.4% of candidates are rejected because pairing is ambiguous. Consider using 'precise' or 'high-purity' pairing instead.
  4. [Fit model and background] The statement that random coincidences have 'even-distributed lifetimes' is correct because the analysis retains only Rn candidates with exactly one Po match in the 3-s window; without that conditioning, the waiting time to the first accidental candidate would be exponential. A one-sentence clarification of this conditional-uniform argument would prevent a common misunderstanding.
  5. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors: 'traversed 220Rn selections' should be 'varied 220Rn selections'; '3.4% of 220Rn candidates event end up' should be 'events end up'; '98948 Rn-Pn pairs' should be 'Rn-Po pairs'; and 'upper right corner of in the detector' has an extra 'of'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the half-life is obtained by a direct fit to measured decay-time intervals and is independently compared with published values.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The 216Po half-life is extracted by pairing 220Rn and 216Po events using energy, timing, and position, and then fitting the resulting decay-time distribution to an exponential plus a flat background (Fig. 5). The fit has three free parameters: the lifetime, an overall normalization, and a background rate. None of these is fixed by the target value, and the reported result 143.7±0.5 ms is not used as an input anywhere in the analysis. The 3 s pairing time window is justified as more than 20 times the expected half-life, but this is not a fitted constraint: a cut at nearly 21 half-lives only excludes an exponentially negligible tail and does not determine the slope of the observed distribution. The paper's systematic checks vary energy cuts, fiducial volume boundaries, spatial proximity cuts, and fit procedures, and none of these variations injects the final half-life as an input. Citations to earlier PandaX work concern detector response, position reconstruction, and calibration infrastructure, not the nuclear lifetime result, so they are not load-bearing in a circular sense. The removal of 3.4% of multi-match candidates is a data-selection choice, and the possible bias from such removal is neither hidden nor equivalent to assuming the answer; the fitted time distribution is directly measured. There is no step in which a defined quantity is constructed from the quantity it claims to predict. Therefore the analysis shows no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The fit is a direct measurement with nuisance parameters, so no free parameter smuggles in the central claim. The main load-bearing premises are detector calibration and pairing assumptions, one of which, the unbiased drop of multi-match events, is not quantified.

free parameters (3)
  • 216Po half-life = 143.7 ± 0.5 ms
    Target observable extracted from a binned exponential fit; the result itself, not an assumed input.
  • Exponential normalization = Not reported
    Nuisance parameter in the exponential plus constant fit.
  • Flat background rate = Not reported
    Nuisance parameter modeling random coincidences in the decay-time histogram.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The 228Th decay chain proceeds 220Rn -> 216Po -> 212Pb with known alpha energies.
    Used to tag Rn and Po events by energy (Fig. 3); energies are taken from nuclear data, not derived in the paper.
  • domain assumption The S1 timestamp of an alpha event marks the nuclear decay time with negligible uncertainty.
    Stated in the timing section; the S1 width near 0.2 us and peak timing uncertainty of a few ns are much smaller than the half-life.
  • domain assumption Position reconstruction precision is a few mm in X-Y and sub-mm in Z.
    Quoted from reference [21]; used to justify the pairing proximity cuts.
  • domain assumption Xenon convection moves decay products at about 3 mm/s, so 216Po displacement over its lifetime is small.
    References [27-29] motivate the 1.5 cm vertical and 5 cm horizontal pairing windows.
  • domain assumption False coincidences in the paired sample are uniformly distributed in decay time.
    Motivates the flat background term in the fit; the lifetime-dependent efficiency from multi-match removal is not modeled.
  • ad hoc to paper Removing the 3.4% of Rn candidates with multiple Po matches does not bias the lifetime fit.
    The paper removes these events without a correction or systematic term. Longer-lived Po nuclei can accumulate random coincidences more easily, so this assumption is load-bearing and unquantified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Precise Measurement of $^{216}$Po Half-life with Exact Parent-daughter Pairing in PandaX-4T." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MI6O4TVL

@misc{pith2026250713241,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Precise Measurement of $^216$Po Half-life with Exact Parent-daughter Pairing in PandaX-4T},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MI6O4TVL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.13241}
}
abstract

We report a precise measurement of $^{216}\rm Po$ half-life using the PandaX-4T liquid xenon time projection chamber (TPC). $^{220}\rm Rn $, emanating from a $^{228}\rm Th $ calibration source, is injected to the detector and undergoes successive $\alpha$ decays, first to $^{216}\rm Po$ and then to $^{212}\rm Pb$. PandaX-4T detector measures the 5-dimensional (5D) information of each decay, including time, energy, and 3-dimensional positions. Therefore, we can identify the $^{220}\rm Rn $ and $^{216}\rm Po$ decay events and pair them exactly to extract the lifetime of each $^{216}\rm Po$. With a large data set and high-precision $^{220}\rm $Rn-$^{216}\rm $Po pairing technique, we measure the $^{216}\rm Po$ half-life to be $143.7\pm0.5$ ms, which is the most precise result to date and agrees with previously published values. The leading precision of this measurement demonstrates the power of 5D calorimeter and the potential of exact parent-daughter pairing in the xenon TPC.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.13241 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: PandaX-4T TPC and xenon circulation system [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: An example time series of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4: Example of exact Rn-Po pairing. Blue circles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The distribution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Our half-life value (in red) is compared with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Gamow, Zur Quantentheorie des Atomkernes, Z

    G. Gamow, Zur Quantentheorie des Atomkernes, Z. Phys.51, 204 (1928)

    1928

  2. [2]

    Hofmann and G

    S. Hofmann and G. Munzenberg, The Discovery of the Heaviest Elements, Rev. Mod. Phys.72, 733 (2000)

    work page 2000

  3. [3]

    Varga, R

    K. Varga, R. G. Lovas, and R. J. Liotta, Absolute alpha decay width of Po-212 in a combined shell and cluster model, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 37 (1992)

    work page 1992

  4. [4]

    Kajino, W

    T. Kajino, W. Aoki, A. B. Balantekin, R. Diehl, M. A. Famiano, and G. J. Mathews, Current status of r -process nucleosynthesis, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.107, 109 (2019), arXiv:1906.05002 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2019

  5. [5]

    H. M. B.A. and K. F. Ph.D., Lix. radio-active products of short life, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philo- sophical Magazine and Journal of Science22, 629 (1911), https://doi.org/10.1080/14786441008637158

    work page doi:10.1080/14786441008637158 1911

  6. [6]

    A. G. Ward and J. D. Cockcroft, A new method of deter- mining half-value periods from observations with a single geiger counter, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Lon- don. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences181, 183 (1942)

    work page 1942

  7. [7]

    Diamond and J

    H. Diamond and J. Gindler, Alpha half-lives of 216po, 217at and 218rn, Journal of Inorganic and Nuclear Chem- istry25, 143 (1963)

    work page 1963

  8. [8]

    J. D. Hey and R. D. Cherry, The half-life of polonium- 216, Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa43, 147 (1978), https://doi.org/10.1080/00359197809520234

    work page doi:10.1080/00359197809520234 1978

Show all 31 references
  1. [9]

    F. A. Danevich, A. S. Georgadze, V. V. Kobychev, B. N. Kropivyansky, A. S. Nikolaiko, O. A. Ponkratenko, V. I. Tretyak, S. Y. Zdesenko, Y. G. Zdesenko, P. G. Bizzeti, T. F. Fazzini, and P. R. Maurenzig, Search for 2βdecay of cadmium and tungsten isotopes: Final results of the ...

    2003

  2. [10]

    L. J. Nadderd, K. M. Suboti´ c, Y. Tsyganov, J. M. Pu- zovi´ c, A. N. Polyakov, A. V. Rykhlyuk, and D. Mani´ c, Measurement of the life-times distribution of 216po, Nu- clear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Sec- tion A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and As...

    2017

  3. [11]

    Azzoliniet al., Measurement of 216Po half-life with the CUPID-0 experiment, Phys

    O. Azzoliniet al., Measurement of 216Po half-life with the CUPID-0 experiment, Phys. Lett. B822, 136642 (2021), arXiv:2105.03329 [nucl-ex]

    2021 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Menget al.(PandaX-4T), Dark Matter Search Results from the PandaX-4T Commissioning Run, Phys

    Y. Menget al.(PandaX-4T), Dark Matter Search Results from the PandaX-4T Commissioning Run, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 261802 (2021), arXiv:2107.13438 [hep-ex]

    2021 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Maet al., Internal calibration of the PandaX-II detec- tor with radon gaseous sources, JINST15(12), P12038, arXiv:2006.09311 [physics.ins-det]

    W. Maet al., Internal calibration of the PandaX-II detec- tor with radon gaseous sources, JINST15(12), P12038, arXiv:2006.09311 [physics.ins-det]

    2006 arXiv

  6. [14]

    K. J. Kang, J. P. Cheng, Y. H. Chen, Y. J. Li, M. B. Shen, S. Y. Wu, and Q. Yue, Status and prospects of a deep underground laboratory in China, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.203, 012028 (2010)

    2010

  7. [15]

    J. Li, X. Ji, W. Haxton, and J. S. Y. Wang, The second-phase development of the China JinPing un- derground Laboratory, Phys. Procedia61, 576 (2015), arXiv:1404.2651 [physics.ins-det]

    2015 arXiv

  8. [16]

    A. Tan, X. Xiao, X. Cui, X. Chen, Y. Chen, D. Fang, C. Fu, K. Giboni, F. Giuliani, H. Gong, S. Hu, X. Huang, X. Ji, Y. Ju, S. Lei, S. Li, X. Li, X. Li, H. Liang, Q. Lin, 7 H. Liu, J. Liu, W. Lorenzon, Y. Ma, Y. Mao, K. Ni, K. Pushkin, X. Ren, M. Schubnell, M. Shen, F. Shi, S. ...

    2016

  9. [17]

    Maet al.(PandaX), Search for Solar B8 Neutrinos in the PandaX-4T Experiment Using Neutrino-Nucleus Co- herent Scattering, Phys

    W. Maet al.(PandaX), Search for Solar B8 Neutrinos in the PandaX-4T Experiment Using Neutrino-Nucleus Co- herent Scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 021802 (2023), arXiv:2207.04883 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Boet al.(PandaX), Dark Matter Search Results from 1.54 Tonne·Year Exposure of PandaX-4T, (2024), arXiv:2408.00664 [hep-ex]

    Z. Boet al.(PandaX), Dark Matter Search Results from 1.54 Tonne·Year Exposure of PandaX-4T, (2024), arXiv:2408.00664 [hep-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Yanet al.(PandaX), Searching for Two-Neutrino and Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay of Xe134 with the PandaX-4T Experiment, Phys

    X. Yanet al.(PandaX), Searching for Two-Neutrino and Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay of Xe134 with the PandaX-4T Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 152502 (2024), arXiv:2312.15632 [nucl-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    J. Yang, X. Chen, C. He, D. Huang, Y. Huang, J. Liu, X. Ren, A. Wang, M. Wang, B. Yan, K. Yin, J. Yang, Y. Yang, and Q. Zheng, Readout electronics and data acquisition system of pandax-4t experiment, Journal of Instrumentation17(02), T02004

  13. [21]

    Zhanget al.(PANDA-X), Horizontal position re- construction in PandaX-II, JINST16(11), P11040, arXiv:2106.08380 [physics.ins-det]

    D. Zhanget al.(PANDA-X), Horizontal position re- construction in PandaX-II, JINST16(11), P11040, arXiv:2106.08380 [physics.ins-det]

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    L. Zhao, X. Cui, W. Ma, Y. Fan, K. Giboni, T. Zhang, J. Liu, and X. Ji, The cryogenics and xenon handling system for the pandax-4t experiment, Journal of Instru- mentation16(06), T06007

  15. [23]

    Cuiet al., Design and commissioning of the PandaX- 4T cryogenic distillation system for krypton and radon removal, JINST16(07), P07046, arXiv:2012.02436 [physics.ins-det]

    X. Cuiet al., Design and commissioning of the PandaX- 4T cryogenic distillation system for krypton and radon removal, JINST16(07), P07046, arXiv:2012.02436 [physics.ins-det]

    2012 arXiv

  16. [24]

    X. Cui, Z. Wang, J. Li, S. Li, L. Si, Y. Ju, W. Ma, J. Liu, L. Zhao, X. Ji, R. Yan, H. Sha, P. Huang, X. Wang, and H. Liu, Radon removal commissioning of the pandax-4t cryogenic distillation system, Journal of Instrumentation 19(07), P07010

  17. [25]

    C. D. Nedlik,Calibration Of The Lux-Zeplin Dual-Phase Xenon Time Projection Chamber With Internally In- jected Radioisotopes, Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts U., Amherst (2022)

    2022

  18. [26]

    J¨ org, S

    F. J¨ org, S. Li, J. Schreiner, H. Simgen, and R. F. Lang, Characterization of a 220Rn source for low-energy electronic recoil calibration of the XENONnT detector, JINST18(11), P11009, arXiv:2306.05673 [physics.ins- det]

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    D. C. Malling,Measurement and Analysis of WIMP De- tection Backgrounds, and Characteri- zation and Per- formance of the Large Underground Xenon Dark Matter Search Experiment, Ph.D. thesis, Brown U. (2014)

    2014

  20. [28]

    Aprileet al.(XENON), Results from a Calibra- tion of XENON100 Using a Source of Dissolved Radon- 220, Phys

    E. Aprileet al.(XENON), Results from a Calibra- tion of XENON100 Using a Source of Dissolved Radon- 220, Phys. Rev. D95, 072008 (2017), arXiv:1611.03585 [physics.ins-det]

    2017 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Aprileet al.((XENON Collaboration)¶, XENON), Offline tagging of radon-induced backgrounds in XENON1T and applicability to other liquid xenon time projection chambers, Phys

    E. Aprileet al.((XENON Collaboration)¶, XENON), Offline tagging of radon-induced backgrounds in XENON1T and applicability to other liquid xenon time projection chambers, Phys. Rev. D110, 012011 (2024), arXiv:2403.14878 [hep-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    J. B. Albertet al.(EXO-200), Measurements of the ion fraction and mobility ofα- andβ-decay products in liquid xenon using the EXO-200 detector, Phys. Rev. C92, 045504 (2015), arXiv:1506.00317 [nucl-ex]

    2015 arXiv

  23. [31]

    J¨ org,From 222Rn measurements in XENONnT and HeXe to radon mitigation in future liquid xenon experi- ments, Ph.D

    F. J¨ org,From 222Rn measurements in XENONnT and HeXe to radon mitigation in future liquid xenon experi- ments, Ph.D. thesis, Heidelberg U. (2022)

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.