Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

Diffuman4D: 4D Consistent Human View Synthesis from Sparse-View Videos with Spatio-Temporal Diffusion Models

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Sliding iterative denoising, alternating across viewpoints and time, produces 4D-consistent novel-view human videos from sparse-view inputs.

desk verdict Sliding iterative denoising is a genuinely useful idea, but the missing timestep schedule for overlapping windows makes the core algorithm unreproducible as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.13344 v1 pith:POGBTCKR submitted 2025-07-17 cs.CV

Yudong Jin , Sida Peng , Xuan Wang , Tao Xie , Zhen Xu , Yifan Yang , Yujun Shen , Hujun Bao
show 1 more author
Xiaowei Zhou
This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords 4Dviewsynthesissparse-viewvideodiffusionmodelnovelslidingwindowdenoisinghumanperformancecaptureGaussiansplattingspatio-temporalconsistency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a sliding iterative denoising process, which alternately denoises a 4D latent grid along spatial and temporal dimensions, lets a spatio-temporal diffusion model obtain a large receptive field and thereby generate 4D-consistent novel-view human videos from sparse-view inputs. This matters because prior multi-view video diffusion models generate views in independent groups and suffer from inconsistencies across groups, which degrades downstream reconstruction. The paper also adds a skeleton and camera conditioning scheme to stabilize human pose and improve appearance quality. On the DNA-Rendering and ActorsHQ datasets, the method reports higher PSNR and SSIM and lower LPIPS than the compared optimization-based, SMPL-based, feed-forward, and generation baselines. If correct, this gives a practical recipe for generating long, consistent multi-view human video from just a few cameras.

What carries the argument

The sliding iterative denoising process is the central mechanism: a context window of length $W$ slides over the $(N+M) \times T$ latent grid with stride $S$, alternately along the spatial (multi-view) and temporal (video) dimensions, performing a few denoising steps per window position and reversing direction to enable bidirectional context aggregation. This is what extends the diffusion model's receptive field without exceeding GPU memory. The second mechanism is skeleton-Plücker mixed conditioning, where 3D skeletons projected into each view are encoded into the latent space and concatenated with Plücker coordinates, giving pixel-aligned human pose and camera control that resolve front-back ambiguity and improve pose accuracy.

What would settle it

Regenerate a test sequence with per-sample noise levels tracked exactly (each latent denoised according to its true step count) and compare the output consistency against the paper's shared-timestep sliding schedule; if the sliding variant does not produce fewer inter-window inconsistencies than independent-window denoising with the same total compute, the claimed large-receptive-field benefit is not supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that consistency in long-sequence multi-view video generation can be achieved by treating all target views and frames as a single 4D latent grid and denoising it with a sliding window that iterates over the spatial and temporal dimensions. Each sample in the grid is a latent encoding the image, camera pose, and human pose for a given viewpoint and timestamp. The window slides counter-clockwise then clockwise in the spatial dimension and similarly in the temporal dimension, and each sample receives a total of $D = 2 \times P \times W / S$ denoising steps, equal to the diffusion inference steps. The authors argue this gives the model a large receptive field, lets nearby samples share more joint denoising steps (matching the correlation structure of 4D data), and keeps GPU memory bounded by the window size. They further condition generation on projected 3D skeletons plus Plücker coordinates to constrain pose, and feed the resulting dense-view videos into a 4D Gaussian Splatting reconstruction pipeline. Experiments show consistent improvements over the compared baselines at both 4-view and 8-view settings.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that during sliding, latents that have undergone different numbers of denoising passes can be fed together with a single shared timestep, and the resulting schedule still behaves like a well-defined diffusion sampling process.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The method enables 1024p, 4D-consistent novel-view human video synthesis from as few as 4 input views, with visual quality reported to be comparable to dense 48-view reconstruction.
  • Alternating spatial and temporal denoising with sliding windows introduces a smoothness inductive bias that removes the group-boundary jumps seen in multi-group and median-filtering denoising strategies.
  • Skeleton conditioning combined with Plücker coordinates reduces camera misalignment and front-back ambiguity, improving the accuracy of generated human poses.
  • The generated dense-view videos can be fed into an off-the-shelf 4D Gaussian Splatting pipeline, yielding a real-time renderable free-viewpoint video representation.
  • The processed DNA-Rendering dataset with recalibrated cameras, color correction, foreground masks, and estimated skeletons is planned for release, which could support future sparse-view human reconstruction research.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The sliding schedule implicitly assumes that all latents in a window can be denoised with a single shared timestep even though samples have undergone different numbers of denoising passes across sliding iterations; a reader could test whether this assumption holds and whether it affects generation quality.
  • The sliding iterative denoising mechanism is not human-specific and could transfer to other multi-view video diffusion tasks, such as general dynamic scenes, where long-sequence consistency is also a bottleneck.
  • The paper sets window length and stride to fixed values ($W=3$, $S=1$) without ablating them; the trade-off between consistency and inference time across these hyperparameters is a testable extension.
  • Releasing the processed DNA-Rendering dataset could standardize sparse-view human evaluation, since the reproduced baseline CAT4D was retrained on the same processed data.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. Diffuman4D proposes a two-stage system for free-viewpoint video synthesis of humans from sparse-view video. In the first stage, a latent diffusion model, initialized from Stable Diffusion 2.1 and fine-tuned on a processed DNA-Rendering subset, generates dense multi-view videos. Input views, skeleton renderings, Plücker coordinates, and a conditional mask are concatenated in latent space. The central novelty is a sliding iterative denoising schedule (Sec. 3.2) in which a window of length W slides with stride S over a latent grid, applying P denoising steps per window, first along the spatial dimension and then along the temporal dimension; the paper claims each latent receives D = 2PW/S denoising steps, yielding a large receptive field at bounded GPU cost. In the second stage, the synthesized videos are used to reconstruct a 4D Gaussian Splatting representation with LongVolcap. Experiments on DNA-Rendering and ActorsHQ compare against LongVolcap, GauHuman, GPS-Gaussian, and a reproduced CAT4D, with ablations over the denoising strategy and conditioning scheme.

Significance. The contribution is potentially significant: if the sliding schedule is well-defined, it offers a practical way to extend multi-view video diffusion to long sequences while keeping memory affordable, and the paper's integration with a 4DGS reconstruction backend is sensible. The paper has clear strengths: evaluation on two public datasets, ablations for both main components, a reproduced CAT4D baseline trained under the same settings, and a plan to release a processed DNA-Rendering dataset. The reported numbers, if reproducible, are substantially better than the baselines. However, the central sampling schedule is under-specified in a way that affects the validity of the method as a diffusion process, and the empirical support would be stronger with error bars and a direct consistency metric.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.2] The sliding iterative denoising schedule is not a well-defined diffusion sampling procedure as written. With overlapping windows (W > S), a new window contains latents that have undergone different numbers of prior denoising updates (e.g., with W=3, S=1, samples 2 and 3 have one more update than sample 4 when the window moves), yet the paper never specifies the diffusion timestep or noise level assigned to each latent in each network call. The formula D = 2PW/S counts network applications, but it cannot be mapped to a standard DDIM/DDPM or DPM-Solver++ schedule unless per-sample timestep bookkeeping is provided; the supplementary's statement that DPM-Solver++ with 24 steps is used does not resolve this because W, S, and P are not reported. Please provide exact pseudocode for the schedule, including per-window/per-sample timestep assignment, boundary handling at sequence ends, and the integer constraints on D/2 and W/S.
  2. [Sec. 4.4 / Table 2] The quantitative evidence for the central claim is incomplete: the denoising-strategy ablation reports only PSNR, SSIM, and LPIPS, which are per-frame image-similarity metrics and do not directly measure spatio-temporal consistency. Since the paper's core claim is that sliding iterative denoising enhances 4D consistency, the evaluation should include a direct consistency metric, such as temporal flicker, cross-view re-projection error, or a warping-based metric, rather than relying on per-frame averages and qualitative figures.
  3. [Tables 1–3] No error bars or significance tests are reported for any of the quantitative comparisons, although the method is stochastic (diffusion sampling with classifier-free guidance). The claim that Diffuman4D 'significantly outperforms' the baselines would be more defensible with means and variances over multiple independent sampling runs and a statement of the number of trials; this applies especially to the small-scale ablations in Tables 2 and 3.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Table 1] The table title contains a typo: 'DNA-Rednering' should be 'DNA-Rendering'.
  2. [Fig. 6 caption] The caption says that 'GPS-Gaussian uses 8 input views while all other methods use 4 input views,' which is inconsistent with Table 1 where GPS-Gaussian is evaluated in both 4-view and 8-view settings; please clarify the input-view counts for each method in each panel.
  3. [Supplementary Sec. A] There are formatting errors such as 'with24 sampling steps' (missing space) and '4D reconstrcution' (misspelled); similar spacing/encoding issues affect 'V AE' in Sec. 3.1 and 'Pl ¨ucker' throughout.
  4. [Sec. 3.2 and Fig. 3b] The notation is inconsistent: the text uses N for target views and T for frames, while Fig. 3b says M=2, N=5 for an 'M-view, N-frame video'; please unify the notation for the number of views and frames.
  5. [Sec. 3.2] The formula for total denoising steps is typeset differently as 'D = 2×P ×W/S' in the text and 'D = 2P W/S' in Fig. 3; please use one consistent form and state the required divisibility conditions (e.g., W/S and D/2 integer).
  6. [Sec. 4.2] Please clarify whether the reproduced CAT4D† uses its original sliding-window strategy or an adapted version of the proposed alternating spatial/temporal procedure, since the current wording says it uses 'the same sampling sequences and conditional-view selection strategy described in Sec. 3.2' but not the same denoising schedule.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the derivation chain is self-contained and evaluated against external baselines.

full rationale

I found no step where an output is defined in terms of an input, no fitted parameter later reported as a prediction, and no load-bearing appeal to a self-citation. The sliding iterative denoising (Sec. 3.2) defines D = 2*P*W/S as a counting identity for how many P-step windows cover each sample; that is a definition used to set the number of sampling steps, not a derivation of the result from the result. The ablation in Table 2 compares sliding iterative against multi-group and median filtering on the same data, and all evaluations use external baselines (CAT4D, GauHuman, GPS-Gaussian, LongVolcap) on public datasets. LongVolcap is an author-provided reconstruction tool used as a shared pipeline stage, not a parameter fitted to the target; using it does not make the novel-view comparison circular. The unspecified per-sample timestep bookkeeping flagged in Sec. 3.2 is a potential correctness/well-definedness issue in the sampling procedure, but it is not an instance of a claim reducing to its own inputs. No circularity score above 0 is warranted.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The central claim relies on a few hand-chosen hyperparameters (W, S, P, guidance scale) and on domain assumptions about the base diffusion model, skeleton estimation accuracy, timestep handling in the sliding schedule, and dataset split cleanliness.

free parameters (4)
  • Window length W and stride S
    Not reported in the paper; they determine the context size and the total denoising steps per sample (D = 2*P*W/S), so the consistency claim depends on their values.
  • Denoising steps per window P
    Not reported; with W and S it sets the total diffusion steps D, so it controls the trade-off between consistency and compute.
  • Classifier-free guidance scale = 3.0
    Chosen in Supplementary A; generation quality and consistency are sensitive to guidance scale.
  • DPM-Solver++ sampling steps = 24
    Supplementary A states 24 sampling steps, while the main text says inference steps equal D; the relation between the two is unclear.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Pretrained Stable Diffusion 2.1 and its autoencoder provide a suitable generative prior for multi-view human video.
    The model is initialized from SD 2.1 (Supplementary A) and the VAE is used without modification (Sec. 3.1); the method inherits whatever biases and resolution limits the base model has.
  • domain assumption 3D skeletons estimated by Sapiens and triangulation from sparse views are accurate enough to condition generation.
    Skeleton conditioning is central to the reported gains (Tab. 3), but skeleton accuracy is not quantified on the test sequences (Sec. 3.3).
  • ad hoc to paper All latents in a sliding window share a single timestep, or the model can handle mixed noise levels within a batch.
    Required for the sliding iterative denoising to be a valid sampling process; no per-sample timestep mechanism is described (Sec. 3.2).
  • domain assumption The DNA-Rendering test sequences used for evaluation are representative and not identity-overlapping with the 1,000 training sequences.
    The train/test split is not described in detail (Sec. 4.2); the reported generalization numbers assume a clean split.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Diffuman4D: 4D Consistent Human View Synthesis from Sparse-View Videos with Spatio-Temporal Diffusion Models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/POGBTCKR

@misc{pith2026250713344,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Diffuman4D: 4D Consistent Human View Synthesis from Sparse-View Videos with Spatio-Temporal Diffusion Models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/POGBTCKR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.13344}
}
read the original abstract

This paper addresses the challenge of high-fidelity view synthesis of humans with sparse-view videos as input. Previous methods solve the issue of insufficient observation by leveraging 4D diffusion models to generate videos at novel viewpoints. However, the generated videos from these models often lack spatio-temporal consistency, thus degrading view synthesis quality. In this paper, we propose a novel sliding iterative denoising process to enhance the spatio-temporal consistency of the 4D diffusion model. Specifically, we define a latent grid in which each latent encodes the image, camera pose, and human pose for a certain viewpoint and timestamp, then alternately denoising the latent grid along spatial and temporal dimensions with a sliding window, and finally decode the videos at target viewpoints from the corresponding denoised latents. Through the iterative sliding, information flows sufficiently across the latent grid, allowing the diffusion model to obtain a large receptive field and thus enhance the 4D consistency of the output, while making the GPU memory consumption affordable. The experiments on the DNA-Rendering and ActorsHQ datasets demonstrate that our method is able to synthesize high-quality and consistent novel-view videos and significantly outperforms the existing approaches. See our project page for interactive demos and video results: https://diffuman4d.github.io/ .

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.13344 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Diffuman4D enables high-fidelity free-viewpoint rendering of human performances from sparse-view videos. The bottom row [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of Diffuman4D. Our model takes M input-view videos as input, generates N target-view videos, and reconstructs a 4DGS of the human using both input and generated videos. Specifically, the input-view videos are encoded into the latent space using a pretrained VAE. The 3D human-skeleton sequence is projected into each view, rendered as RGB maps, and encoded into the same latent space. In addition, the camera p… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Illustration of our denoising framework. (a) Sliding iterative denoising mechanism. Given a view sequence arranged in a circular manner, we initialize a context window of length W (here, W = 3). The window slides counterclockwise with a stride of S (here, S = 1), and in each iteration, the samples within the context window are fed into the model for P denoising steps. After completing a full rotation, we reverse the… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Qualitative comparison of different conditioning. The skeleton-Plucker mixed conditioning serves as a robust hu- ¨ man pose prior for diffusion models. ing in noisy renderings. GauHuman [22] fails to reliably reconstruct performers wearing complex clothing and ex￾ecuti…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Qualitative comparison of different denoising strategies. Our sliding iterative denoising method ensures a consistent appear￾ance throughout a long image sequence [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Qualitative comparison on DNA-Rendering [10] and ActorsHQ [23]. GPS-Gaussian uses 8 input views while all other methods use 4 input views. CAT4D† is our reproduced version. Our Diffuman4D consistently outperforms baselines with higher visual quality and better spatio-t…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Our voting strategy effectively leverages the strengths [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: More qualitative comparisons on DNA-Rendering [10] and ActorsHQ [23]. GPS-Gaussian uses 8 input views while all others use 4 input views, and CAT4D† is our reproduced version. Our Diffuman4D consistently outperforms baselines with higher visual quality and better spati…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: High-quality foreground masks and human skeletons [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Qualitative comparisons between novel views generated by our model and those rendered from the 4DGS model reconstructed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SparseCam4D: Spatio-Temporally Consistent 4D Reconstruction from Sparse Cameras

    cs.CV 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    SparseCam4D achieves spatio-temporally consistent high-fidelity 4D reconstruction from sparse cameras via a Spatio-Temporal Distortion Field that corrects inconsistencies in generative observations.

  2. Splatography: Sparse multi-view dynamic Gaussian Splatting for filmmaking challenges

    cs.CV 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Splatography improves dynamic 3D reconstruction from sparse multi-view videos by splitting foreground and background Gaussian representations and applying tailored deformation learning for each.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Easymocap - make human motion capture easier. Github,

  2. [2]

    Creation of 3d human avatar using kinect

    Kairat Aitpayev and Jaafar Gaber. Creation of 3d human avatar using kinect. Asian Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communication & Multimedia , 1(5):12–24,

  3. [3]

    Tc4d: Trajectory-conditioned text-to-4d generation

    Sherwin Bahmani, Xian Liu, Wang Yifan, Ivan Sko- rokhodov, Victor Rong, Ziwei Liu, Xihui Liu, Jeong Joon Park, Sergey Tulyakov, Gordon Wetzstein, et al. Tc4d: Trajectory-conditioned text-to-4d generation. In European Conference on Computer Vision , pages 53–72. Springer,

  4. [4]

    4d-fy: Text-to-4d generation using hybrid score dis- tillation sampling

    Sherwin Bahmani, Ivan Skorokhodov, Victor Rong, Gordon Wetzstein, Leonidas Guibas, Peter Wonka, Sergey Tulyakov, Jeong Joon Park, Andrea Tagliasacchi, and David B Lin- dell. 4d-fy: Text-to-4d generation using hybrid score dis- tillation sampling. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 7996–8006, 2024. 3

    2024

  5. [5]

    Detailed full-body reconstructions of moving peo- ple from monocular rgb-d sequences

    Federica Bogo, Michael J Black, Matthew Loper, and Javier Romero. Detailed full-body reconstructions of moving peo- ple from monocular rgb-d sequences. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision , pages 2300–2308, 2015. 2

    2015

  6. [6]

    Video generation models as world simulators

    Tim Brooks, Bill Peebles, Connor Holmes, Will DePue, Yufei Guo, Li Jing, David Schnurr, Joe Taylor, Troy Luh- man, Eric Luhman, et al. Video generation models as world simulators. 2024. URL https://openai. com/research/video- generation-models-as-world-simulators, 3:1, 2024. 3

    2024

  7. [7]

    Hexplane: A fast representa- tion for dynamic scenes

    Ang Cao and Justin Johnson. Hexplane: A fast representa- tion for dynamic scenes. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 130–141, 2023. 2

    2023

  8. [8]

    pixelsplat: 3d gaussian splats from image pairs for scalable generalizable 3d reconstruction

    David Charatan, Sizhe Li, Andrea Tagliasacchi, and Vincent Sitzmann. pixelsplat: 3d gaussian splats from image pairs for scalable generalizable 3d reconstruction. In CVPR, 2024. 3

    work page 2024

Show all 86 references
  1. [9]

    Mvsplat: Efficient 3d gaussian splatting from sparse multi-view images

    Yuedong Chen, Haofei Xu, Chuanxia Zheng, Bohan Zhuang, Marc Pollefeys, Andreas Geiger, Tat-Jen Cham, and Jianfei Cai. Mvsplat: Efficient 3d gaussian splatting from sparse multi-view images. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.14627, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Dna- rendering: A diverse neural actor repository for high-fidelity human-centric rendering

    Wei Cheng, Ruixiang Chen, Wanqi Yin, Siming Fan, Keyu Chen, Honglin He, Huiwen Luo, Zhongang Cai, Jingbo Wang, Yang Gao, Zhengming Yu, Zhengyu Lin, Daxuan Ren, Lei Yang, Ziwei Liu, Chen Change Loy, Chen Qian, Wayne Wu, Dahua Lin, Bo Dai, and Kwan-Yee Lin. Dna- rendering: A div...

    arXiv

  3. [11]

    High-quality streamable free-viewpoint video

    Alvaro Collet, Ming Chuang, Pat Sweeney, Don Gillett, Den- nis Evseev, David Calabrese, Hugues Hoppe, Adam Kirk, and Steve Sullivan. High-quality streamable free-viewpoint video. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG) , 34(4):1–13,

  4. [12]

    Obja- verse: A universe of annotated 3d objects

    Matt Deitke, Dustin Schwenk, Jordi Salvador, Luca Weihs, Oscar Michel, Eli VanderBilt, Ludwig Schmidt, Kiana Ehsani, Aniruddha Kembhavi, and Ali Farhadi. Obja- verse: A universe of annotated 3d objects. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.08051, 2022. 2

    2022 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Objaverse-xl: A universe of 10m+ 3d objects

    Matt Deitke, Ruoshi Liu, Matthew Wallingford, Huong Ngo, Oscar Michel, Aditya Kusupati, Alan Fan, Chris- tian Laforte, Vikram V oleti, Samir Yitzhak Gadre, Eli VanderBilt, Aniruddha Kembhavi, Carl V ondrick, Georgia Gkioxari, Kiana Ehsani, Ludwig Schmidt, and Ali Farhadi. Obja...

    2023 arXiv

  6. [14]

    4d-rotor gaussian splatting: towards efficient novel view synthesis for dynamic scenes

    Yuanxing Duan, Fangyin Wei, Qiyu Dai, Yuhang He, Wen- zheng Chen, and Baoquan Chen. 4d-rotor gaussian splatting: towards efficient novel view synthesis for dynamic scenes. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2024 Conference Papers , pages 1–11,

    2024

  7. [15]

    Fast dynamic radiance fields with time-aware neural vox- els

    Jiemin Fang, Taoran Yi, Xinggang Wang, Lingxi Xie, Xi- aopeng Zhang, Wenyu Liu, Matthias Nießner, and Qi Tian. Fast dynamic radiance fields with time-aware neural vox- els. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2022 Conference Papers, pages 1–9,

    2022

  8. [16]

    K-planes: Explicit radiance fields in space, time, and appearance

    Sara Fridovich-Keil, Giacomo Meanti, Frederik Rahbæk Warburg, Benjamin Recht, and Angjoo Kanazawa. K-planes: Explicit radiance fields in space, time, and appearance. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vi- sion and Pattern Recognition, pages 12479–12488, 2023. 2

    2023

  9. [17]

    Massively parallel multiview stereopsis by surface normal diffusion

    Silvano Galliani, Katrin Lasinger, and Konrad Schindler. Massively parallel multiview stereopsis by surface normal diffusion. 2015. 2

    2015

  10. [18]

    Srinivasan, Jonathan T

    Ruiqi Gao, Aleksander Holynski, Philipp Henzler, Arthur Brussee, Ricardo Martin-Brualla, Pratul P. Srinivasan, Jonathan T. Barron, and Ben Poole. Cat3d: Create anything in 3d with multi-view diffusion models. In NeurIPS 2024,

    2024

  11. [19]

    Studio production system for dynamic 3d con- tent

    Oliver Grau. Studio production system for dynamic 3d con- tent. In Visual Communications and Image Processing 2003, pages 80–89. SPIE, 2003. 2

    2003

  12. [20]

    Viewdiff: 3d-consistent image generation with text-to-image models

    Lukas H ¨ollein, Aljaˇz Boˇziˇc, Norman M¨uller, David Novotny, Hung-Yu Tseng, Christian Richardt, Michael Zollh ¨ofer, and Matthias Nießner. Viewdiff: 3d-consistent image generation with text-to-image models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pa...

    2024

  13. [21]

    Cogvideo: Large-scale pretraining for text-to-video generation via transformers

    Wenyi Hong, Ming Ding, Wendi Zheng, Xinghan Liu, and Jie Tang. Cogvideo: Large-scale pretraining for text-to-video generation via transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.15868, 2022. 3

    2022 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Gauhuman: Articulated gaus- sian splatting from monocular human videos

    Shoukang Hu and Ziwei Liu. Gauhuman: Articulated gaus- sian splatting from monocular human videos. arXiv preprint arXiv:, 2023. 3, 6, 7

    2023

  15. [23]

    Humanrf: High-fidelity neural radiance fields for humans in motion

    Mustafa Is ¸ık, Martin R ¨unz, Markos Georgopoulos, Taras Khakhulin, Jonathan Starck, Lourdes Agapito, and Matthias Nießner. Humanrf: High-fidelity neural radiance fields for humans in motion. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 42(4):1–12, 2023. 6, 7, 8, 2

    2023

  16. [24]

    Pl ¨ucker coordinates for lines in the space.Prob- lem Solver Techniques for Applied Computer Science, Com- S-477/577 Course Handout, 3, 2020

    Yan-Bin Jia. Pl ¨ucker coordinates for lines in the space.Prob- lem Solver Techniques for Applied Computer Science, Com- S-477/577 Course Handout, 3, 2020. 3

    2020

  17. [25]

    Virtualized reality: Constructing virtual worlds from real scenes

    Takeo Kanade, Peter Rander, and PJ Narayanan. Virtualized reality: Constructing virtual worlds from real scenes. IEEE multimedia, 4(1):34–47, 1997. 2

    1997

  18. [26]

    3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering

    Bernhard Kerbl, Georgios Kopanas, Thomas Leimk ¨uhler, and George Drettakis. 3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 42 (4), 2023. 2, 1

    2023

  19. [27]

    Sapiens: Foundation for human vision mod- els

    Rawal Khirodkar, Timur Bagautdinov, Julieta Martinez, Su Zhaoen, Austin James, Peter Selednik, Stuart Anderson, and Shunsuke Saito. Sapiens: Foundation for human vision mod- els. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.12569, 2024. 5, 1

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Adam: A method for stochastic optimization

    Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 ,

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    Hunyuanvideo: A systematic framework for large video generative models

    Weijie Kong, Qi Tian, Zijian Zhang, Rox Min, Zuozhuo Dai, Jin Zhou, Jiangfeng Xiong, Xin Li, Bo Wu, Jianwei Zhang, et al. Hunyuanvideo: A systematic framework for large video generative models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03603, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    A theory of shape by space carving

    Kiriakos N Kutulakos and Steven M Seitz. A theory of shape by space carving. International journal of computer vision , 38:199–218, 2000. 1

    2000

  23. [31]

    Vivid-zoo: Multi-view video generation with diffusion model.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:62189–62222,

    Bing Li, Cheng Zheng, Wenxuan Zhu, Jinjie Mai, Biao Zhang, Peter Wonka, and Bernard Ghanem. Vivid-zoo: Multi-view video generation with diffusion model.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:62189–62222,

  24. [32]

    Neural 3d video synthesis from multi-view video

    Tianye Li, Mira Slavcheva, Michael Zollhoefer, Simon Green, Christoph Lassner, Changil Kim, Tanner Schmidt, Steven Lovegrove, Michael Goesele, Richard Newcombe, et al. Neural 3d video synthesis from multi-view video. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vi- si...

    2022

  25. [33]

    Ani- matable gaussians: Learning pose-dependent gaussian maps for high-fidelity human avatar modeling

    Zhe Li, Zerong Zheng, Lizhen Wang, and Yebin Liu. Ani- matable gaussians: Learning pose-dependent gaussian maps for high-fidelity human avatar modeling. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2024. 3

    2024

  26. [34]

    Efficient neural radiance fields for interactive free-viewpoint video

    Haotong Lin, Sida Peng, Zhen Xu, Yunzhi Yan, Qing Shuai, Hujun Bao, and Xiaowei Zhou. Efficient neural radiance fields for interactive free-viewpoint video. In SIGGRAPH Asia Conference Proceedings, 2022. 3

    2022

  27. [35]

    Real-time high-resolution background matting

    Shanchuan Lin, Andrey Ryabtsev, Soumyadip Sengupta, Brian L Curless, Steven M Seitz, and Ira Kemelmacher- Shlizerman. Real-time high-resolution background matting. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8762–8771, 2021. 1

    2021

  28. [36]

    Raft-stereo: Multilevel recurrent field transforms for stereo matching

    Lahav Lipson, Zachary Teed, and Jia Deng. Raft-stereo: Multilevel recurrent field transforms for stereo matching. In 2021 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) , pages 218–227. IEEE, 2021. 3

    2021

  29. [37]

    Zero-1-to-3: Zero-shot one image to 3d object, 2023

    Ruoshi Liu, Rundi Wu, Basile Van Hoorick, Pavel Tok- makov, Sergey Zakharov, and Carl V ondrick. Zero-1-to-3: Zero-shot one image to 3d object, 2023. 3

    2023

  30. [38]

    Mvsgaussian: Fast generalizable gaussian splatting recon- struction from multi-view stereo

    Tianqi Liu, Guangcong Wang, Shoukang Hu, Liao Shen, Xinyi Ye, Yuhang Zang, Zhiguo Cao, Wei Li, and Ziwei Liu. Mvsgaussian: Fast generalizable gaussian splatting recon- struction from multi-view stereo. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 37–53. Springer, 2024. 3

    2024

  31. [39]

    Syncdreamer: Gen- erating multiview-consistent images from a single-view im- age

    Yuan Liu, Cheng Lin, Zijiao Zeng, Xiaoxiao Long, Lingjie Liu, Taku Komura, and Wenping Wang. Syncdreamer: Gen- erating multiview-consistent images from a single-view im- age. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.03453, 2023. 3

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Smpl: A skinned multi- person linear model

    Matthew Loper, Naureen Mahmood, Javier Romero, Gerard Pons-Moll, and Michael J Black. Smpl: A skinned multi- person linear model. In Seminal Graphics Papers: Pushing the Boundaries, Volume 2, pages 851–866. 2023. 2

    2023

  33. [41]

    Dpm-solver: A fast ode solver for diffu- sion probabilistic model sampling in around 10 steps

    Cheng Lu, Yuhao Zhou, Fan Bao, Jianfei Chen, Chongxuan Li, and Jun Zhu. Dpm-solver: A fast ode solver for diffu- sion probabilistic model sampling in around 10 steps. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.00927, 2022. 1

    2022 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view syn- thesis

    Ben Mildenhall, Pratul P Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T Barron, Ravi Ramamoorthi, and Ren Ng. Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view syn- thesis. Communications of the ACM , 65(1):99–106, 2021. 2

    2021

  35. [43]

    Dynamicfusion: Reconstruction and tracking of non-rigid scenes in real-time

    Richard A Newcombe, Dieter Fox, and Steven M Seitz. Dynamicfusion: Reconstruction and tracking of non-rigid scenes in real-time. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 343–352,

  36. [44]

    Effi- cient4d: Fast dynamic 3d object generation from a single- view video

    Zijie Pan, Zeyu Yang, Xiatian Zhu, and Li Zhang. Effi- cient4d: Fast dynamic 3d object generation from a single- view video. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.08742, 2024. 3

    2024

  37. [45]

    Barron, Sofien Bouaziz, Dan B Goldman, Steven M

    Keunhong Park, Utkarsh Sinha, Jonathan T. Barron, Sofien Bouaziz, Dan B Goldman, Steven M. Seitz, and Ricardo Martin-Brualla. Nerfies: Deformable neural radiance fields. ICCV, 2021. 3

    2021

  38. [46]

    Barron, Sofien Bouaziz, Dan B Goldman, Ricardo Martin- Brualla, and Steven M

    Keunhong Park, Utkarsh Sinha, Peter Hedman, Jonathan T. Barron, Sofien Bouaziz, Dan B Goldman, Ricardo Martin- Brualla, and Steven M. Seitz. Hypernerf: A higher- dimensional representation for topologically varying neural radiance fields. ACM Trans. Graph., 40(6), 2021. 3

    2021

  39. [47]

    Ani- matable neural radiance fields for modeling dynamic human bodies

    Sida Peng, Junting Dong, Qianqian Wang, Shangzhan Zhang, Qing Shuai, Xiaowei Zhou, and Hujun Bao. Ani- matable neural radiance fields for modeling dynamic human bodies. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Con- ference on Computer Vision, pages 14314–14323, 2021. 3

    2021

  40. [48]

    Neural body: Implicit neural representations with structured latent codes for novel view synthesis of dynamic humans

    Sida Peng, Yuanqing Zhang, Yinghao Xu, Qianqian Wang, Qing Shuai, Hujun Bao, and Xiaowei Zhou. Neural body: Implicit neural representations with structured latent codes for novel view synthesis of dynamic humans. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and ...

    2021

  41. [49]

    Dreamfusion: Text-to-3d using 2d diffusion

    Ben Poole, Ajay Jain, Jonathan T Barron, and Ben Milden- hall. Dreamfusion: Text-to-3d using 2d diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14988, 2022. 3

    2022 arXiv

  42. [50]

    D-NeRF: Neural Radiance Fields for Dynamic Scenes

    Albert Pumarola, Enric Corona, Gerard Pons-Moll, and Francesc Moreno-Noguer. D-NeRF: Neural Radiance Fields for Dynamic Scenes. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2020. 3

    2020

  43. [51]

    Dreamgaussian4d: Genera- tive 4d gaussian splatting

    Jiawei Ren, Liang Pan, Jiaxiang Tang, Chi Zhang, Ang Cao, Gang Zeng, and Ziwei Liu. Dreamgaussian4d: Genera- tive 4d gaussian splatting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.17142,

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Bj ¨orn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 10684–10695, 2022. 1

    2022

  45. [53]

    Structure-from-motion revisited

    Johannes Lutz Sch ¨onberger and Jan-Michael Frahm. Structure-from-motion revisited. In Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016. 2, 1

    2016

  46. [54]

    Pixelwise view selection for un- structured multi-view stereo

    Johannes Lutz Sch ¨onberger, Enliang Zheng, Marc Pollefeys, and Jan-Michael Frahm. Pixelwise view selection for un- structured multi-view stereo. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2016. 2, 1

    2016

  47. [55]

    Tensor4d: Efficient neural 4d decomposition for high-fidelity dynamic reconstruction and rendering

    Ruizhi Shao, Zerong Zheng, Hanzhang Tu, Boning Liu, Hongwen Zhang, and Yebin Liu. Tensor4d: Efficient neural 4d decomposition for high-fidelity dynamic reconstruction and rendering. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 166...

    2023

  48. [56]

    Rapid avatar capture and simulation using commodity depth sensors

    Ari Shapiro, Andrew Feng, Ruizhe Wang, Hao Li, Mark Bo- las, Gerard Medioni, and Evan Suma. Rapid avatar capture and simulation using commodity depth sensors. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds, 25(3-4):201–211, 2014. 2

    2014

  49. [57]

    Mvdream: Multi-view diffusion for 3d gen- eration

    Yichun Shi, Peng Wang, Jianglong Ye, Mai Long, Kejie Li, and Xiao Yang. Mvdream: Multi-view diffusion for 3d gen- eration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.16512, 2023. 3

    2023 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Text-to-4d dy- namic scene generation

    Uriel Singer, Shelly Sheynin, Adam Polyak, Oron Ashual, Iurii Makarov, Filippos Kokkinos, Naman Goyal, Andrea Vedaldi, Devi Parikh, Justin Johnson, et al. Text-to-4d dy- namic scene generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.11280 ,

    arXiv

  51. [59]

    Virtual view synthesis of people from multiple view video sequences

    Jonathan Starck and Adrian Hilton. Virtual view synthesis of people from multiple view video sequences. Graphical Models, 67(6):600–620, 2005. 2

    2005

  52. [60]

    Surface capture for performance-based animation

    Jonathan Starck and Adrian Hilton. Surface capture for performance-based animation. IEEE computer graphics and applications, 27(3):21–31, 2007. 2

    2007

  53. [61]

    Scanning 3d full human bodies using kinects

    Jing Tong, Jin Zhou, Ligang Liu, Zhigeng Pan, and Hao Yan. Scanning 3d full human bodies using kinects. IEEE trans- actions on visualization and computer graphics, 18(4):643– 650, 2012. 2

    2012

  54. [62]

    Diffusers: State-of-the-art diffu- sion models

    Patrick von Platen, Suraj Patil, Anton Lozhkov, Pedro Cuenca, Nathan Lambert, Kashif Rasul, Mishig Davaadorj, Dhruv Nair, Sayak Paul, William Berman, Yiyi Xu, Steven Liu, and Thomas Wolf. Diffusers: State-of-the-art diffu- sion models. https://github.com/huggingface/ diffusers...

    2022

  55. [63]

    Fourier plenoctrees for dynamic radiance field ren- dering in real-time

    Liao Wang, Jiakai Zhang, Xinhang Liu, Fuqiang Zhao, Yan- shun Zhang, Yingliang Zhang, Minye Wu, Jingyi Yu, and Lan Xu. Fourier plenoctrees for dynamic radiance field ren- dering in real-time. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognitio...

    2022

  56. [64]

    Imagedream: Image-prompt multi-view diffusion for 3d generation

    Peng Wang and Yichun Shi. Imagedream: Image-prompt multi-view diffusion for 3d generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.02201, 2023. 3

    2023 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Daniel Watson, Saurabh Saxena, Lala Li, Andrea Tagliasac- chi, and David J. Fleet. Controlling space and time with dif- fusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.07860, 2024. 2, 4

    2024 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Hu- mannerf: Free-viewpoint rendering of moving people from monocular video

    Chung-Yi Weng, Brian Curless, Pratul P Srinivasan, Jonathan T Barron, and Ira Kemelmacher-Shlizerman. Hu- mannerf: Free-viewpoint rendering of moving people from monocular video. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF con- ference on computer vision and pattern Recognition , pages 162...

    2022

  59. [67]

    4d gaussian splatting for real-time dynamic scene render- ing

    Guanjun Wu, Taoran Yi, Jiemin Fang, Lingxi Xie, Xiaopeng Zhang, Wei Wei, Wenyu Liu, Qi Tian, and Xinggang Wang. 4d gaussian splatting for real-time dynamic scene render- ing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 2...

    2024

  60. [68]

    Barron, and Aleksander Holynski

    Rundi Wu, Ruiqi Gao, Ben Poole, Alex Trevithick, Changxi Zheng, Jonathan T. Barron, and Aleksander Holynski. Cat4d: Create anything in 4d with multi-view video diffu- sion models. arXiv:2411.18613, 2024. 2, 3, 4, 6, 7

    2024 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Sv4d: Dynamic 3d content generation with multi-frame and multi-view consistency

    Yiming Xie, Chun-Han Yao, Vikram V oleti, Huaizu Jiang, and Varun Jampani. Sv4d: Dynamic 3d content generation with multi-frame and multi-view consistency. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.17470, 2024. 2, 3

    2024 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Easyvolcap: Accelerating neural volumetric video research

    Zhen Xu, Tao Xie, Sida Peng, Haotong Lin, Qing Shuai, Zhiyuan Yu, Guangzhao He, Jiaming Sun, Hujun Bao, and Xiaowei Zhou. Easyvolcap: Accelerating neural volumetric video research. 2023. 5

    2023

  63. [71]

    Relightable and animatable neural avatar from sparse-view video

    Zhen Xu, Sida Peng, Chen Geng, Linzhan Mou, Zihan Yan, Jiaming Sun, Hujun Bao, and Xiaowei Zhou. Relightable and animatable neural avatar from sparse-view video. In CVPR, 2024. 3

    2024

  64. [72]

    4k4d: Real-time 4d view synthesis at 4k resolution

    Zhen Xu, Sida Peng, Haotong Lin, Guangzhao He, Jiaming Sun, Yujun Shen, Hujun Bao, and Xiaowei Zhou. 4k4d: Real-time 4d view synthesis at 4k resolution. InCVPR, 2024. 2, 1

    2024

  65. [73]

    Representing long volumet- ric video with temporal gaussian hierarchy

    Zhen Xu, Yinghao Xu, Zhiyuan Yu, Sida Peng, Jiaming Sun, Hujun Bao, and Xiaowei Zhou. Representing long volumet- ric video with temporal gaussian hierarchy. ACM Transac- tions on Graphics, 43(6), 2024. 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 1, 3

    2024

  66. [74]

    Diffusion2: Dynamic 3d content generation via score composition of orthogonal diffusion models

    Zeyu Yang, Zijie Pan, Chun Gu, and Li Zhang. Diffusion2: Dynamic 3d content generation via score composition of orthogonal diffusion models. arXiv e-prints, pages arXiv– 2404, 2024. 3

    2024

  67. [75]

    Cogvideox: Text-to-video diffusion models with an expert transformer

    Zhuoyi Yang, Jiayan Teng, Wendi Zheng, Ming Ding, Shiyu Huang, Jiazheng Xu, Yuanming Yang, Wenyi Hong, Xiao- han Zhang, Guanyu Feng, et al. Cogvideox: Text-to-video diffusion models with an expert transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06072, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Real- time photorealistic dynamic scene representation and render- ing with 4d gaussian splatting

    Zeyu Yang, Hongye Yang, Zijie Pan, and Li Zhang. Real- time photorealistic dynamic scene representation and render- ing with 4d gaussian splatting. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2024. 2, 1

    2024

  69. [77]

    Mvsnet: Depth inference for unstructured multi-view stereo

    Yao Yao, Zixin Luo, Shiwei Li, Tian Fang, and Long Quan. Mvsnet: Depth inference for unstructured multi-view stereo. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vi- sion (ECCV), pages 767–783, 2018. 3

    2018

  70. [78]

    Recurrent mvsnet for high-resolution multi-view stereo depth inference

    Yao Yao, Zixin Luo, Shiwei Li, Tianwei Shen, Tian Fang, and Long Quan. Recurrent mvsnet for high-resolution multi-view stereo depth inference. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 5525–5534, 2019. 3

    2019

  71. [79]

    4dgen: Grounded 4d content gen- eration with spatial-temporal consistency

    Yuyang Yin, Dejia Xu, Zhangyang Wang, Yao Zhao, and Yunchao Wei. 4dgen: Grounded 4d content gen- eration with spatial-temporal consistency. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.17225, 2023. 3

    2023 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Stag4d: Spatial-temporal anchored generative 4d gaussians

    Yifei Zeng, Yanqin Jiang, Siyu Zhu, Yuanxun Lu, Youtian Lin, Hao Zhu, Weiming Hu, Xun Cao, and Yao Yao. Stag4d: Spatial-temporal anchored generative 4d gaussians. In Eu- ropean Conference on Computer Vision , pages 163–179. Springer, 2024. 3

    2024

  73. [81]

    4diffusion: Multi-view video dif- fusion model for 4d generation

    Haiyu Zhang, Xinyuan Chen, Yaohui Wang, Xihui Liu, Yun- hong Wang, and Yu Qiao. 4diffusion: Multi-view video dif- fusion model for 4d generation. Advances in Neural Infor- mation Processing Systems, 37:15272–15295, 2025. 3

    2025

  74. [82]

    Cameras as rays: Pose estimation via ray diffusion

    Jason Y Zhang, Amy Lin, Moneish Kumar, Tzu-Hsuan Yang, Deva Ramanan, and Shubham Tulsiani. Cameras as rays: Pose estimation via ray diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.14817, 2024. 4

    2024 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Animate124: Animating one im- age to 4d dynamic scene

    Yuyang Zhao, Zhiwen Yan, Enze Xie, Lanqing Hong, Zhen- guo Li, and Gim Hee Lee. Animate124: Animating one im- age to 4d dynamic scene. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.14603,

    arXiv

  76. [84]

    Bilateral refer- ence for high-resolution dichotomous image segmentation

    Peng Zheng, Dehong Gao, Deng-Ping Fan, Li Liu, Jorma Laaksonen, Wanli Ouyang, and Nicu Sebe. Bilateral refer- ence for high-resolution dichotomous image segmentation. CAAI Artificial Intelligence Research, 3:9150038, 2024. 1

    2024

  77. [85]

    Gps- gaussian: Generalizable pixel-wise 3d gaussian splatting for real-time human novel view synthesis

    Shunyuan Zheng, Boyao Zhou, Ruizhi Shao, Boning Liu, Shengping Zhang, Liqiang Nie, and Yebin Liu. Gps- gaussian: Generalizable pixel-wise 3d gaussian splatting for real-time human novel view synthesis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Re...

    2024

  78. [86]

    A unified approach for text- and image-guided 4d scene generation

    Yufeng Zheng, Xueting Li, Koki Nagano, Sifei Liu, Otmar Hilliges, and Shalini De Mello. A unified approach for text- and image-guided 4d scene generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 7300–7309, 2024. 3 Diffuman4D:...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.