Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 18 references

Probing neutrino emission at GeV energies from compact binary mergers detected during O1-O4a with the IceCube Neutrino Observatory

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper searches for GeV neutrinos in 500-second windows around 178 compact binary mergers and finds no excess, setting 90% upper limits on the all-flavour flux.

desk verdict A believable null result for GeV neutrinos from binary mergers, but the proceedings text lacks the statistical detail to verify the quoted limits, and the companion reference is mis-cited. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.13698 v1 pith:23OEH75B submitted 2025-07-18 astro-ph.HE

Karlijn Kruiswijk (1) , Mathieu Lamoureux (1) , Matthias Vereecken (1) , Gwenhaël de Wasseige (1) (for the IceCube Collaboration , (1) Centre for Cosmology , Particle Physics , Phenomenology - CP3 , Université Catholique de Louvain
show 2 more authors
Louvain-la-Neuve Belgium)
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords neutrinoastronomycompactbinarymergersgravitationalwavesGeVneutrinosIceCube-DeepCoreELOWENupperlimitsmulti-messenger
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Compact binary mergers detected in gravitational waves are candidate sources of GeV neutrinos, which could be produced when protons and neutrons collide in the merger environment. The paper searches for such neutrinos with the ELOWEN sample, a low-energy event selection from the dense central part of the IceCube detector, checking for an excess in a ±500-second window around each of 178 mergers detected from 2015 through January 2024. It finds no statistically significant excess: the most promising event, S230707ai, has a 0.25% pre-trial p-value that becomes 40% after accounting for trials, and a binomial test for a subpopulation of neutrino-emitting mergers returns 81%. With no signal, the paper sets 90% upper limits on the all-flavour neutrino flux for $E^{-\gamma}$ spectra with $\gamma = 2$, 2.5, and 3. If the result stands, the GeV neutrino emission from these mergers is too faint to be seen by this selection.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Extremely-LOW-ENergy (ELOWEN) sample: clusters of hits in DeepCore, the dense inner sub-volume of the IceCube Neutrino Observatory, selected with a background rate of about 20–25 mHz and primary sensitivity to neutrinos in the 0.5–5 GeV range. The search counts ELOWEN events in $\pm 500$ s windows centred on each gravitational-wave time $t_{\rm GW}$, with an additional window $[t_{\rm GW}, t_{\rm GW}+3\,{\rm s}]$ for mergers involving at least one neutron star, motivated by the observed delay between GW170817 and GRB 170817A. Significance is judged by pre-trial and trial-corrected post-trial p-values for the most promising window, and limits are computed as 90% credible upper bounds on the flux normalisation $\phi$ in $F(E)=\phi (E/{\rm GeV})^{-\gamma}$.

What would settle it

Run the same ELOWEN search on the next set of gravitational-wave detections with the background rate measured independently in adjacent off-source windows; an event whose post-trial p-value is below 1% after the full trial correction, or a measured background drift outside the quoted 20–25 mHz range, would contradict the paper's claim of no excess.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central result is a null measurement: in the ELOWEN sample, none of the 178 compact binary mergers observed by the gravitational-wave detectors between O1 and O4a shows a GeV neutrino excess above the expected background. The best single-event candidate, S230707ai, has a pre-trial p-value of 0.25%, but the post-trial p-value is 40%, so the candidate is consistent with background. The subpopulation search, a binomial test, gives a post-trial p-value of 81%. The paper therefore reports 90% credible upper limits on the all-flavour time-integrated flux at Earth for power-law spectra with spectral indices 2, 2.5, and 3, and displays the $\gamma=2$ limits together with the higher-energy GRECO and GFU searches.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes the ELOWEN background rate, stated as about 20–25 mHz, is stable and correctly known across the full 2015–2024 observing period; if the rate drifts with detector conditions, the p-values and upper limits move with it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The 90% credible upper limits bound the all-flavour neutrino flux at Earth under $E^{-2}$, $E^{-2.5}$, and $E^{-3}$ power-law spectra, constraining hadronic GeV emission from compact binary mergers.
  • The null result extends merger-neutrino searches into the 0.5–5 GeV band, complementing the GRECO and GFU searches at higher energies.
  • The binomial subpopulation test finding a post-trial p-value of 81% leaves no evidence that a particular class of the analysed mergers is a regular GeV neutrino emitter.
  • As the paper notes, combining ELOWEN with other IceCube samples in joint analyses would tighten constraints on the neutrino energy distribution and could reveal production mechanisms that single-band searches miss.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One inference the authors do not draw is that the two highlighted binary neutron star mergers, GW170817 and GW190425, are the natural benchmarks for future GeV-neutrino searches because their nearby distances make them the most promising targets.
  • A stacked search that sums ELOWEN counts over all neutron-star mergers, rather than testing each event individually, would likely improve sensitivity and could expose a weak cumulative signal that the current per-event analysis treats as background.
  • If the ELOWEN background rate at 20–25 mHz is representative, a single merger would need to produce a large prompt neutrino flare to be seen, so the null result suggests that any prompt GeV emission is either rare or below the current trigger threshold, a statement that can be compared with theoretical models of proton–proton emission.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This proceedings contribution reports a search for GeV neutrinos from compact binary mergers using the IceCube-DeepCore ELOWEN event selection. The search covers 178 mergers from LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA O1 through O4a, using ±500 s windows around each gravitational-wave time and an additional [t_GW, t_GW+3 s] window for mergers involving neutron stars. The authors report no statistically significant excess: the best pre-trial p-value is 0.25% (S230707ai), the post-trial p-value is 40%, and a binomial subpopulation test yields 81%. They present 90% upper limits on the all-flavour neutrino flux for E^-2, E^-2.5, and E^-3 spectra, with the E^-2 limits shown in Figure 1 against GRECO and GFU results. All methodological details are deferred to a related publication [8].

Significance. If the quoted numbers are correct, this is a useful null measurement in an unexplored energy regime: it places GeV-range constraints on neutrino emission from compact binary mergers and complements higher-energy IceCube searches. The paper's strengths are its clearly stated p-values and limits, its use of external gravitational-wave catalogs (no circularity), and the explicit comparison of complementary event selections in Figure 1. Its main limitation is that none of the statistical machinery—background model, trial factors, limit construction, or systematics—is present in the submitted text, and the reference that is supposed to supply these details is cited with an internally inconsistent arXiv identifier. The central null result (post-trial p-value 40%) is plausible, but the quantitative upper limits cannot be verified as submitted.

major comments (3)
  1. [References, ref. [8]] All statistical details are deferred to reference [8], cited as 'arXiv (2025) [2105.13160]'. An arXiv identifier of the form 2105.xxxxx corresponds to a May 2021 submission, which cannot be a 2025 paper describing O4a results (O4a ends January 2024). Because the paper contains no other description of the background model, trial correction, or limit-setting procedure, the quoted pre-trial/post-trial p-values (0.25%, 40%, 81%) and the 90% limits in Figure 1 cannot be checked from the submitted manuscript. The reference must be corrected and, if it is indeed a different paper, the methods must be summarized in this manuscript or the analysis must be made available.
  2. [Analysis, ELOWEN background rate] The only background information given is that ELOWEN has a 'background rate of about 20−25 mHz'. Both the p-values and the upper limits scale directly with this rate, yet no background model, time-variation study, or systematic uncertainty is presented. Over the 2015–2024 span of O1–O4a, detector conditions and noise can change substantially; the stated 20–25 mHz spread alone implies an approximate 20% normalization uncertainty. The manuscript should either report how this uncertainty propagates into the final limits or provide a verifiable reference to a background model.
  3. [Analysis, p-value procedure] The text reports the best pre-trial p-value (0.25%) and the corresponding post-trial p-value (40%) but does not define the test statistic, the background-only distribution, or the trial factor. Similarly, the binomial subpopulation test yielding 81% is not defined. These definitions are needed to interpret the central null claim; if they are only in reference [8], the proceedings should at least state the test statistic and the number of trials.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The energy range is written as '0.5-–5 GeV' in the abstract and introduction; this appears to contain a stray extra dash and should be '0.5–5 GeV'.
  2. [Analysis] The phrase 'the GRECO Astronomy [3]' should read 'the GRECO analysis [3]' or 'the GRECO sample [3]'; GRECO is the name of the event sample, not an astronomical facility.
  3. [Figure 1 caption] The axis label 'E2F(E)' should use a superscript for the squared energy, e.g., \(E^2 F(E)\), and the caption's 'all−flavour' contains a minus sign where a hyphen is intended.
  4. [Analysis] The text states upper limits are at '90% credible level' but elsewhere uses 'upper limits'; the Bayesian versus frequentist nature of the interval should be clarified, or the terminology aligned.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the null result and upper limits follow from observed counts in external GW windows and a previously defined ELOWEN selection; no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: external gravitational-wave catalog times (refs [9–12]) plus the ELOWEN neutrino-candidate selection (defined in prior IceCube work) yield counts in ±500 s windows; these counts are compared with the stated background rate (about 20–25 mHz) to produce pre-trial and post-trial p-values, and then upper limits under assumed E^-γ spectra. None of these steps equates the output to an input by construction: the upper limits are computed from observed counts and assumed spectra, not from a parameter fitted to the same data and then renamed a prediction. The only input drawn from a self-citation is the ELOWEN background rate and analysis details deferred to the companion paper [8]; that is a measured detector property, not the target result, and the central null conclusion (post-trial p=40%) is robust to the coarse 20–25 mHz range. One verifiability defect should be flagged but is not circularity: reference [8] is cited as 'arXiv (2025) [2105.13160]', an arXiv ID that cannot correspond to a 2025 submission, so the companion details are not verifiable as submitted. This is a completeness/correctness concern, not circular reasoning. The paper is self-contained against external GW catalogs and does not reduce any claim to a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumed stability and calibration of the ELOWEN sample, on the accuracy of the gravitational-wave catalogs, and on the assumed power-law spectra for converting counts to flux limits. No free parameters are fitted in this proceedings; the spectral indices are scanned values.

free parameters (1)
  • Spectral index gamma = 2, 2.5, 3
    The 90% CL upper limits are quoted for three assumed power-law spectra F(E) = phi (E/GeV)^-gamma. These are not fitted to the data; they are model assumptions selected by the authors to parameterize the limits.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption ELOWEN event selection correctly identifies neutrino-induced hit clusters in DeepCore with energies in the 0.5-5 GeV range and a stable background rate of 20-25 mHz.
    Invoked in the Analysis section to define the data sample; no simulation or validation is shown in this proceedings, and the definition is in reference [6].
  • domain assumption The LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA catalogs (GWTC-1, GWTC-2, GWTC-2.1, GWTC-3 and O4 alerts) provide accurate trigger times and classifications for the 178 mergers.
    The search windows are centered on t_GW from these catalogs; incorrect times or classifications would misalign the neutrino search.
  • domain assumption The GeV neutrino flux from compact binary mergers follows an unbroken power law E^-gamma over the sensitive range.
    Used to convert observed counts to flux upper limits; the true spectrum may differ, affecting the validity of the quoted limits for other spectral shapes.
  • standard math Standard frequentist/Bayesian statistics for counting experiments (e.g., Poisson likelihood, binomial test) apply to the ELOWEN event counts.
    Used to compute pre-trial and post-trial p-values (0.25%, 40%, 81%); not derived in the text.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Probing neutrino emission at GeV energies from compact binary mergers detected during O1-O4a with the IceCube Neutrino Observatory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/23OEH75B

@misc{pith2026250713698,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Probing neutrino emission at GeV energies from compact binary mergers detected during O1-O4a with the IceCube Neutrino Observatory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/23OEH75B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.13698}
}
abstract

Compact binary mergers, detected in gravitational waves since 2015, are candidate sources for astrophysical neutrinos in the GeV regime from proton-proton and proton-neutron collisions. This contribution presents the results of the search for such a signal using mergers detected during the fourth observing run of the LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA interferometers. We use the dense infill array at the center of the IceCube detector, IceCube-DeepCore, to select neutrino candidates in the 0.5-5 GeV energy range. The search for a statistically significant excess associated with an astrophysical signal is performed in a $\pm$ 500 s window around the gravitational wave detection time. We do not observe any statistically significant excess in the neutrino data, and set upper limits on the neutrino emission from these objects. Additionally, we search for subpopulations of neutrino-emitting sources, including merger events detected in previous observing runs; no significant signal has been identified yet.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.13698 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Summary of 90% upper limits on the all-flavour time-integrated energy-squared flux 𝐸 2𝐹 𝜈+𝜈¯ all−flavour(𝐸) assuming a power-law spectrum 𝐹 𝜈+𝜈¯ all−flavour(𝐸) = 𝜙(𝐸/GeV) −2 . The different colours correspond to different IceCube samples: ELOWEN (this work), GRECO [3], and GFU [14]. The spans in the horizontal axis correspond to the central 90% sensitive energy range for each GW event and sample. The thicker dashed … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

18 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [8]

    IceCube Collaboration, The Design and Performance of IceCube DeepCore , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2012.01.004 Astropart. Phys. 35 (2012) 615 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1109.6096 1109.6096 ]

    arXiv 2012

  2. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION blank.sep after.quote 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry output.state after.quoted.block = 'skip 'add.period if write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip output.state after.quote = after.quoted.block 'output.state := after.block 'output.state := if if FUNCTION new.sentence out...

    work page

  3. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION blank.sep after.quote 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry output.state after.quoted.block = 'skip 'add.period if write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip output.state after.quote = after.quoted.block 'output.state := after.block 'output.state := if if FUNCTION new.sentence out...

    work page

  4. [3]

    Murase, K

    K. Murase, K. Kashiyama and P. M\'esz\'aros, Subphotospheric Neutrinos from Gamma-Ray Bursts: The Role of Neutrons , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.131102 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 131102 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.4236 1301.4236 ]

    arXiv 2013

  5. [4]

    Murase et al., Neutrinos from the Brightest Gamma-Ray Burst? , https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aca3ae Astrophys

    K. Murase et al., Neutrinos from the Brightest Gamma-Ray Burst? , https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aca3ae Astrophys. J. Lett. 941 (2022) L10 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.15625 2210.15625 ]

    arXiv 2022

  6. [5]

    IceCube Collaboration, A Search for IceCube Sub-TeV Neutrinos Correlated with Gravitational-wave Events Detected By LIGO/Virgo , https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aceefc Astrophys. J. 959 (2023) 96 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.15970 2303.15970 ]

    arXiv 2023

  7. [6]

    KM3NeT Collaboration, Searches for neutrino counterparts of gravitational waves from the LIGO/Virgo third observing run with KM3NeT , https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/04/026 JCAP 04 (2024) 026 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.03804 2311.03804 ]

    work page arXiv 2024

  8. [7]

    Super-Kamiokande Collaboration, Search for neutrinos in coincidence with gravitational wave events from the LIGO-Virgo O3a Observing Run with the Super-Kamiokande detector , https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac0d5a Astrophys. J. 918 (2021) 78 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.09196 2104.09196 ]

    arXiv 2021

Show all 18 references
  1. [9]

    IceCube Collaboration, The IceCube Neutrino Observatory: Instrumentation and Online Systems , https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/12/03/P03012 JINST 12 (2017) P03012 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.05093 1612.05093 ]

    2017 arXiv

  2. [10]

    IceCube Collaboration, Probing neutrino emission at GeV energies from compact binary mergers with the IceCube Neutrino Observatory , arXiv (2025) [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.13160 2105.13160 ]

    2025

  3. [11]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031040 Phys. Rev. X 9 (2019) 031040 [ https://arxiv.org/abs...

    2019 arXiv

  4. [12]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.021053 Phys. Rev. X 11 (2021) 021053 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.14527 2010.14527 ]

    2021 arXiv

  5. [13]

    LIGO Scientific, VIRGO Collaboration, GWTC-2.1: Deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.022001 Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 022001 [ https://arxiv.org/abs...

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific Collaboration, GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041039 Phys. Rev. X 13 (2023) 041039 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.03606 2111.03606 ]

    2023 arXiv

  7. [15]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi GBM, INTEGRAL, IceCube, AstroSat Cadmium Zinc Telluride Imager Team, IPN, Insight-Hxmt, ANTARES, Swift, AGILE Team, 1M2H Team, Dark Energy Camera GW-EM, DES, DLT40, GRAWITA, Fermi-LAT, ATCA, ASKAP, Las Cumbres Observatory Group, OzGrav, DWF (Deepe...

    2017 arXiv

  8. [16]

    IceCube Collaboration, IceCube Search for Neutrinos Coincident with Gravitational Wave Events from LIGO/Virgo Run O3 , https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aca5fc Astrophys. J. 944 (2023) 80 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.09532 2208.09532 ]

    2023

  9. [17]

    IceCube Collaboration, Probing neutrino emission at GeV energies from astrophysical transient events with the IceCube Neutrino Observatory , https://doi.org/10.22323/1.444.1513 PoS ICRC2023 (2023) 1513 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.16190 2307.16190 ]

    2023 arXiv

  10. [18]

    IceCube Collaboration, The IceCube Upgrade - Design and Science Goals , https://doi.org/10.22323/1.358.1031 PoS ICRC2019 (2021) 1031 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.09441 1908.09441 ]

    2021 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.