Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 185 references

XUE 10. The CO2-rich terrestrial planet-forming region of an externally irradiated Herbig disk

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read JWST observations of the externally irradiated Herbig disk XUE 10 detect, for the first time in a protoplanetary disk, all four CO2 isotopologues at once, revealing a CO2-rich, water-poor inner disk with possibly non-interstellar oxygen…

desk verdict Genuinely new CO2 isotopologue detections, but the continuum subtraction is model-dependent enough that the rarest lines and the isotope ratios need careful scrutiny. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.13921 v2 pith:ZUHJOUGY submitted 2025-07-18 astro-ph.EP

Jenny Frediani , Arjan Bik , María Claudia Ramírez-Tannus , Rens Waters , Konstantin V. Getman , Eric D. Feigelson , Bayron Portilla-Revelo , Benoît Tabone
show 13 more authors
Thomas J. Haworth Andrew Winter Thomas Henning Giulia Perotti Alexis Brandeker Germán Chaparro Pablo Cuartas-Restrepo Sebastián Hernández Michael A. Kuhn Thomas Preibisch Veronica Roccatagliata Sierk E. van Terwisga Peter Zeidler
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords protoplanetarydisksCO2isotopologuesJWSTMIRIMRSexternallyirradiatedHerbiginnerdiskchemistryoxygenisotopesNGC6357
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports JWST mid-infrared spectroscopy of XUE 10, an F-type disk in the massive cluster NGC 6357 bathed in far-ultraviolet radiation about $10^3$ times stronger than in the solar neighborhood. The authors claim the first simultaneous detection of four carbon-dioxide isotopologues—12CO2, 13CO2, 16O12C18O, and 16O12C17O—in any protoplanetary disk, with column densities of the main species among the highest ever measured in a terrestrial-planet-forming region. They find almost no water, with an upper limit on column density of about $10^{18}$ cm$^{-2}$, and a CO2/H2O column ratio of at least roughly 130, far above any previously measured disk. They argue that the CO2-rich, water-poor chemistry can be produced by water removal through stellar UV photo-dissociation or advection, CO2 formation via CO + OH, and outer-disk truncation by external photoevaporation. If correct, the result shows that planet-forming material in massive clusters can carry oxygen isotope anomalies set by UV irradiation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the 0D local-thermodynamic-equilibrium slab radiative transfer model, run on grids of total column density, gas temperature, and equivalent emitting radius, with reduced chi-square maps giving the 1-sigma contours. In the 12.9–17.6 micron region the CO2 lines are so strong that they form a pseudo-continuum on top of the dust continuum; the continuum subtraction therefore anchors its spline on model templates of the isotopologue emission, and this choice directly sets the measured column densities. The fitting proceeds sequentially from the brightest species (12CO2) to the fainter isotopologues, includes mutual line shielding, and uses a mix of optically thick Q-branches (peak line optical depths of 90, 55, 4, and 3 for 12CO2, 13CO2, 16O12C18O, and 16O12C17O) and optically thin P- and R-branch lines to constrain the parameter space. The central comparison is the set of column-density ratios among the four isotopologues against interstellar 12C/13C, 16O/18O, and 16O/17O ratios.

What would settle it

Re-fit the 12.9–17.6 micron MIRI MRS spectrum with a non-LTE radiative transfer model and with continuum anchor points taken from a dust-only emission model, then recompute the 16O/18O and 16O/17O column-density ratios; if the ratios return to interstellar values within 1 sigma, the claimed oxygen isotope anomaly is an artifact of the LTE slab and continuum-subtraction assumptions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that XUE 10's inner disk is CO2-dominated and water-depleted, with CO2 emission bright enough to reveal four isotopic species simultaneously in a protoplanetary disk for the first time. From 0D LTE slab fits to the 12.9–17.6 micron continuum-subtracted spectrum, the authors derive gas temperatures of 300–370 K and column densities from $7.4\times10^{17}$ cm$^{-2}$ for 16O12C17O to $1.3\times10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$ for 12CO2 over an equivalent emitting radius of 1.15 au, with 13CO2 at $8.3\times10^{19}$ cm$^{-2}$. The resulting 12C/13C, 16O/18O, and 16O/17O column-density ratios depart from interstellar values by factors of several to more than ten; the paper argues that the 13CO2 excess is plausibly an optical-depth artifact, while the 16O12C18O and 16O12C17O excesses may be real abundance anomalies, although 0D slab models cannot definitively separate opacity effects from abundance patterns. The proposed physical picture is that external FUV irradiation removes water by photo-dissociation or advection, CO2 is enhanced in the gas phase through CO + OH, and early inward drift of isotopically anomalous water ice supplies the oxygen isotope pattern.

Load-bearing premise

The derived column densities, temperatures, and isotope ratios all assume that a 0D LTE slab describes the emitting gas and that the model-anchored continuum subtraction in the CO2 pseudo-continuum window removes only dust, not real molecular emission; if either assumption gives way, the extreme CO2 columns and the apparent oxygen isotope anomalies would change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • XUE 10 becomes the benchmark case for inner-disk chemistry under external FUV irradiation around intermediate-mass stars, and any disk model for massive clusters must reproduce a CO2/H2O column ratio of at least roughly 130.
  • Simultaneous high-significance detection of four CO2 isotopologues at 1.69 kpc demonstrates that JWST/MIRI can push isotope-ratio studies of planet-forming gas well beyond the nearby star-forming regions.
  • If the oxygen isotope enhancement in 16O12C18O and 16O12C17O is real, the solids and gas that build terrestrial planets in irradiated clusters can be isotopically distinct from solar-system material, connecting disk environment to planetary isotope composition.
  • The strict water upper limit, combined with the absence of OH and CH3+, implies that strong external UV can suppress water vapor without producing the molecular emission signature of a well-developed photo-dissociation region.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test the paper leaves implicit: compare XUE 10 with the survey's other disks across their range of external FUV fields; if the CO2/H2O column ratio increases with FUV exposure, irradiation rather than stellar mass is the controlling variable.
  • The same 12.9–17.6 micron analysis applied to nearby non-irradiated T Tauri disks would establish a control sample; a clean separation in 16O/18O versus 16O/17O between irradiated and isolated disks would identify external UV as the fractionation driver.
  • If the oxygen isotopologue excesses survive non-LTE modeling, they imply that terrestrial-planet building blocks in massive clusters may resemble certain carbonaceous chondrite isotope reservoirs, giving an environmental pathway to meteoritic anomalies.
  • The unidentified 15.5–17 micron emission bump sits exactly under the CO2 bands; fitting it with dust or molecular carriers before re-deriving CO2 columns would provide a sharper test of the claimed CO2 column densities.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents JWST/MIRI MRS and VLT/FORS2 observations of XUE 10, an F-type Herbig disk in the massive cluster NGC 6357 exposed to strong external FUV radiation. It reports the first simultaneous detection of four CO2 isotopologues (12CO2, 13CO2, 16O12C18O, 16O12C17O) in a protoplanetary disk, together with faint CO emission, the HI Pfalpha line, and upper limits on water. The molecular emission is modeled with 0D LTE slab models, yielding column densities, temperatures, and equivalent emitting radii; the stellar parameters are derived from PHOENIX template fitting to the optical spectrum. The paper interprets the enhanced 16O12C18O and 16O12C17O column densities as a possible oxygen isotope anomaly and discusses in-situ chemistry versus radial-transport scenarios to explain the CO2-rich, water-poor spectrum.

Significance. If the central detections and derived ratios hold, this is an important result: it would be the first simultaneous detection of four CO2 isotopologues in a protoplanetary disk, obtainable only with JWST, and it would extend isotope-ratio studies to the terrestrial planet-forming regions of an externally irradiated Herbig disk. The paper is careful in hedging the isotope anomaly, provides chi-square maps and parameter tables, and places the source in a comparative context with T Tauri and Herbig samples. A notable strength is the explicit acknowledgement of the Ntot-Tgas-Rem degeneracy and the optical-depth ambiguity. However, the central claim rests on a continuum subtraction procedure in the 12.9-17.6 micron region that is partly defined using the same slab model family used for the fits, and the claimed per-isotopologue >5-sigma significances are not quantified in the text. The result is scientifically exciting but the measurement robustness needs to be demonstrated more directly.

major comments (4)
  1. [Appendix A; Section 4; Tables 2 and 3] In the 12.9-17.6 micron region the continuum anchor points are chosen "based on templates of each isotopologue emission" for different values of temperature, column density, and equivalent emitting radius. Because the same 0D LTE slab models are subsequently fit to the residual spectrum, the continuum level is not independent of the model; a template mismatch can systematically suppress or enhance the fitted line fluxes. Since the claimed >5-sigma detections and the column density ratios in Tables 2 and 3 are all measured on this continuum-subtracted spectrum, these quantities are not yet demonstrated to be robust. Please provide an independent continuum estimate, for example an iterative full-model continuum or a spline anchored on wavelengths selected without reference to isotopologue templates, and show how the fitted parameters, their uncertainties, and the detection significances change.
  2. [Appendix B; Section 4.1] The broad 15.5-17 micron feature of unknown origin is subtracted before the CO2 fit. This wavelength range overlaps with the 12CO2 and 13CO2 fundamental Q-branches and with several fit windows listed in Table D.1 (for example 16.178-16.290 micron). If any part of the bump is actually CO2 emission, the fitted column densities and the 13CO2/12CO2 ratio will be biased. Please quantify the maximum CO2 flux that could be hidden in the bump and report the resulting systematic uncertainty on the Table 2 parameters.
  3. [Section 4.2; Table 3] The derived oxygen isotope ratios are 65 +/- 92 for 16O/18O and 174 +/- 247 for 16O/17O, and the 12C/13C anomaly disappears when 13CO2 is fit with a free emitting radius (Table 2). Given these large uncertainties and the Ntot-Tgas-Rem degeneracy, the claim of anomalous 16O12C18O and 16O12C17O abundances needs a formal significance statement, such as a confidence interval or likelihood ratio relative to the ISM ratios that includes the full parameter degeneracy. As written, the abstract's "may be isotopically anomalous" is appropriately hedged, but the paper should not imply that the anomaly is established without this quantitative assessment.
  4. [Section 3.1; Section 4.1] The paper states that the four isotopologues are detected at >5-sigma significance, but no per-isotopologue signal-to-noise ratio, line flux measurement, or Delta-chi-square significance is provided. The chi-square maps show best-fit locations, not detection significances. Please provide a quantitative significance estimate for each isotopologue, especially 16O12C18O and 16O12C17O, and state the statistical criterion used for the ">5-sigma" claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figure A.1 caption] The wavelength units in the caption appear to read "7.49-7.51 m" and similar; these should be micrometers (micron).
  2. [Section 4.1] The phrase "may be own to the higher luminosity" should read "may be due to the higher luminosity."
  3. [Table 3] The definition of the reported ratios is confusing: the table gives ISM ratios and then a footnote says "we consider half of these ratios," while the observed ratios appear to be molecular column-density ratios. Please clarify explicitly whether the comparison is between elemental oxygen ratios or molecular isotopologue column-density ratios, and how the halving is applied.
  4. [Section 4.2] The text first argues that 16O12C18O and 16O12C17O may be isotopically anomalous and then states that "the most plausible conclusion is that we are affected by line optical depth effects also toward" these species; this tension should be reconciled in the conclusions.
  5. [Section 5.2.1] The sentence "This implies that alternatively to thermal effects, a high column density of CO2..." is awkwardly phrased and should be rewritten for clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the CO2 isotopologue column densities and isotope ratios are measured by fitting independent LTE slab models to observed line fluxes and then compared to external ISM benchmarks; the continuum-subtraction caveat is a model dependence, not a derivation-equivalent input.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, the first simultaneous >5sigma detection of four CO2 isotopologues in a protoplanetary disk, rests on a standard reduction chain: MIRI MRS spectra, local spline continuum subtraction, a grid of 0D LTE slab models with HITRAN line data, and chi-square fitting of Ntot, Tgas, and Rem. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The apparent isotope anomalies in Table 3 are ratios of independently fitted column densities from Table 2, compared with external ISM ratios (Milam et al. 2005; Wilson & Rood 1994; Penzias 1981), so the comparison has independent content. The continuum anchor points in Appendix A were chosen with the aid of isotopologue templates, and the unidentified 15.5-17 micron bump (Appendix B) is subtracted before the CO2 fit; these are genuine systematic/model-dependence concerns that could bias the derived columns and detection significances, but they do not constitute an equation-level reduction of the output to the input. The paper explicitly acknowledges the degeneracy between optical depth and abundance (Section 4.2: '0D gas slab models do not allow one to discriminate between line optical depth effects and abundance patterns') and presents the isotope anomalies as tentative. Self-citations (Tabone et al. 2023 for the slab model; Ramirez-Tannus et al. 2023/2025 for reduction and sample context) are present but are code/method or program references, not a uniqueness theorem forcing the result; the fitting grid, HITRAN molecular data, and external ISM standards provide independent support. Therefore the derivation chain is not circular; the minor overlapping-author citations are not load-bearing, corresponding to a score of 2.

Assumptions & free parameters 10 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. It does rely on a set of fitted model parameters (column densities, temperatures, radii) and several domain assumptions: LTE, the fidelity of continuum subtraction, ISM baseline ratios, outer disk truncation, and the adopted FUV field. The most load-bearing assumptions are LTE and the continuum subtraction in the CO2 pseudo-continuum region, because they directly affect the fitted column densities and hence the isotope anomaly interpretation.

free parameters (10)
  • 12CO2 total column density log10(Ntot) = 20.11 (+2.89/-1.69)
    Best-fit column density from LTE slab grid; sets the CO2-rich claim.
  • 12CO2 gas temperature Tgas = 365 K (+438/-186)
    Best-fit temperature; degenerate with column density and emitting radius.
  • 12CO2 equivalent emitting radius Rem = 1.15 au (+1.89/-0.14)
    Best-fit radius; fixed for other isotopologues in one fit variant.
  • 13CO2 total column density = 19.9 (+2.7/-2.9) log10 cm-2
    Fixed-radius fit; likely affected by optical depth effects.
  • 16O12C18O column density = 18.3 (+0.8/-1.3) log10 cm-2
    Input to the 16O/18O ratio; the claimed anomaly depends on it.
  • 16O12C17O column density = 17.87 (+1.03/-1.29) log10 cm-2
    Input to the 16O/17O ratio; the claimed anomaly depends on it.
  • 12CO column density = 14.0 (+1.4/-0) log10 cm-2
    Lower limit from the 2-sigma CO detection; not central to the main claim.
  • H2O upper-limit column density = 1e18 cm-2
    Fiducial slab model normalized to residual luminosity, not a formal fit.
  • Stellar effective temperature Teff = 7000 K (+400/-300)
    From PHOENIX template fit; sets stellar luminosity and disk scale.
  • Stellar bolometric luminosity Lbol = 69 +/- 5 Lsun
    Derived from J-band magnitude, bolometric correction, and extinction; used for ice line estimates.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption LTE for all modeled molecular gas
    0D slab models assume local thermodynamic equilibrium; non-LTE excitation is plausible for CO and CO2 Q-branches (Sections 4 and 5.2.1).
  • domain assumption Continuum subtraction preserves the molecular features
    CO2 forms a pseudo-continuum, and continuum anchor points were chosen from model templates; residual bias would change all fitted columns (Appendix A).
  • domain assumption ISM isotopic ratios are the correct baseline
    The anomaly claim compares fitted ratios to ISM values; a cluster-specific baseline could shift the conclusion (Table 3).
  • domain assumption Outer disk truncation by external FUV
    The transport scenario assumes truncation; the paper notes only indirect evidence (Section 5.2.2).
  • domain assumption FUV field strength of about 5e3 G0 from prior XUE work
    Adopted from same-team prior analysis; affects the interpretation but not the raw detections.
  • standard math HITRAN line list completeness and accuracy
    All synthetic spectra rely on HITRAN transition data (Gordon et al. 2022); errors in line data would propagate to column densities.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of XUE 10. The CO2-rich terrestrial planet-forming region of an externally irradiated Herbig disk." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZUHJOUGY

@misc{pith2026250713921,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: XUE 10. The CO2-rich terrestrial planet-forming region of an externally irradiated Herbig disk},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZUHJOUGY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.13921}
}
abstract

We investigate the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) MIRI MRS gas molecular content of an externally irradiated Herbig disk, the F-type XUE 10 source, in the context of the eXtreme UV Environments (XUE) program. XUE 10 belongs to the massive star cluster NGC 6357 (1.69 kpc), where it is exposed to an external far-ultraviolet (FUV) radiation $\approx$ 10$^3$ times stronger than in the Solar neighborhood. We modeled the molecular features in the mid-infrared spectrum with Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium (LTE) 0D slab models. We derived basic parameters of the stellar host from a VLT FORS2 optical spectrum using PHOENIX stellar templates. We detect bright CO2 gas with the first simultaneous detection (> 5$\sigma$) of four isotopologues (12CO2, 13CO2, 16O12C18O, 16O12C17O) in a protoplanetary disk. We also detect faint CO emission (2$\sigma$) and the HI Pf$\alpha$ line (8$\sigma$). We also place strict upper limits on the water content, finding a total column density $\lesssim$ 10$^{18}$ cm$^{-2}$. The CO2 species trace low gas temperatures (300-370 K) with a range of column densities of 7.4 $\times$ 10$^{17}$ cm$^{-2}$ (16O12C17O)-1.3 $\times$ 10$^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$ (12CO2) in an equivalent emitting radius of 1.15 au. The emission of 13CO2 is likely affected by line optical depth effects. 16O12C18O and 16O12C17O abundances may be isotopically anomalous compared to the 16O/18O and 16O/17O ratios measured in the interstellar medium and the Solar System. We propose that the mid-infrared spectrum of XUE 10 is explained by H2O removal either via advection or strong photo-dissociation by stellar UV irradiation, and enhanced local CO2 gas-phase production. Outer disk truncation supports the observed CO2-H2O dichotomy. A CO2 vapor enrichment in 18O and 17O can be explained by means of external UV irradiation and early on (10$^{4-5}$ yr) delivery of isotopically anomalous water ice to the inner disk.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.13921 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Full JWST/MIRI MRS extinction-corrected spectrum of XUE 10. The identified dust and gas phase polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) features are labeled and highlighted with a solid line. The insets zoom into various wavelength regions with the detection of carbon monoxide ( 12CO), four carbon dioxide isotopic species (12CO2, 13CO2, 16O 12C 18O, 16O 12C 17O), atomic hydrogen (HI Pfα line), and the tentative detectio… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Chi-square best-fit PHOENIX template (blue) overlaid on the telluric-corrected observed optical spectrum (black) after normalization. of these isotopes (corresponding to the 000 → 010 transition of the υ2 bending mode), but also hot Q-branch bandheads (e.g., 011 → 111) and blended P- and R-branch lines (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Continuum-subtracted MIRI spectrum of XUE 10 (black) with overlaid best-fit slab models of the identified carbon dioxide isotopologues, 12CO2 (red), 13CO2 (orange), 16O 12C 18O (green), and 16O 12C 17O (purple) between 12.93 µm and 17.6 µm (from top to bottom). The vibrational quantum numbers (υ1υ2υ3) corresponding to the fundamental υ2 Q-branch, and its associated hot bands are labeled for each species. The inset i… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Continuum-subtracted MIRI spectrum of XUE 10 (black) overlaid with the total slab model of 12CO2, 13CO2, 16O 12C 18O, and 16O 12C 17O between 12.93 µm and 17.6 µm (from top to bottom panel) assuming ISM isotopic ratios in the column density. The colored horizontal bars…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Continuum-subtracted MIRI spectrum of XUE 10 (black) overlaid with the best-fit slab models of carbon monoxide (12CO; gold). The colored horizontal bars indicate the fit wavelength ranges listed in Table D.1. The spectral uncertainty is labeled in figure. HI Pfα σRMS σ…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Continuum-subtracted MIRI spectrum of XUE 10 (black) and fiducial LTE slab models of H2O between 6.4 µm and 7.6 µm (top panel) and between 18 µm and 25 µm (middle and bottom panels). The observed spectrum is vertically offset for visual clarity. The vertical dotted lin…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison between the gas phase molecular line luminosities and 13–25 µm spectral indices measured in the XUE 10 (yellow star) and the rest of the XUE sample (orange stars; Ramírez-Tannus et al. 2025), GW Lup (Grant et al. 2023), and the Spitzer sample analyzed in Ban…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison of the 13CO2 fundamental υ2 Q-branch (orange) with 12CO2 P-branch lines (red) in the continuum-subtracted spectrum of XUE 10 (black). The orange and red curves refer respectively to the 13CO2 and 12CO2 best-fit slab models. In brown with shaded filling, we i…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Oxygen isotope fractionation of protostellar systems relative to the ISM (black circle). Solid and dashed lines have a slope of 0.5 and 1, as expected respectively for mass-independent and mass-dependent iso￾topic fractionation. XUE 10 is shown with a star marker and e…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

185 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    C., Hollenbach , D., Laughlin , G., & Gorti , U

    Adams , F. C., Hollenbach , D., Laughlin , G., & Gorti , U. 2004, , 611, 360

    2004

  2. [2]

    2018, A&A, 616, A19

    Agúndez , Roueff, Evelyne , Le Petit, Franck , & Le Bourlot, Jacques . 2018, A&A, 616, A19

    2018

  3. [3]

    2025, OJAp, 8, 54

    Allen , M., Anania , R., Andersen , M., et al. 2025, OJAp, 8, 54

    2025

  4. [4]

    E., Bergin, E

    Anderson, D. E., Bergin, E. A., Blake, G. A., et al. 2017, , 845, 13

    2017

  5. [5]

    E., Blake, G

    Anderson, D. E., Blake, G. A., Cleeves, L. I., et al. 2021, , 909, 55

    2021

  6. [6]

    M., Huang, J., Pérez, L

    Andrews, S. M., Huang, J., Pérez, L. M., et al. 2018, , 869, L41

    2018

  7. [7]

    P., Manara , C

    Ansdell , M., Williams , J. P., Manara , C. F., et al. 2017, , 153, 240

    2017

  8. [8]

    , Lahuis, F

    Antonellini , Kamp, I. , Lahuis, F. , et al. 2016, A&A, 585, A61

    2016

Show all 185 references
  1. [9]

    M., Kamp , I., Henning , T., et al

    Arabhavi , A. M., Kamp , I., Henning , T., et al. 2024, Science, 384, 1086

    2024

  2. [10]

    L., Mauc \'o , K., Manara , C

    Aru , M. L., Mauc \'o , K., Manara , C. F., et al. 2024, , 687, A93

    2024

  3. [11]

    2025, , 170, 67

    Arulanantham, N., Salyk, C., Pontoppidan, K., et al. 2025, , 170, 67

    2025

  4. [12]

    P., Cleeves, L

    Ballering, N. P., Cleeves, L. I., Haworth, T. J., et al. 2023, , 954, 127

    2023

  5. [13]

    , Kama, M

    Banzatti , Garufi, A. , Kama, M. , et al. 2018, A&A, 609, L2

    2018

  6. [14]

    M., Brittain, S., et al

    Banzatti, A., Abernathy, K. M., Brittain, S., et al. 2022, , 163, 174

    2022

  7. [15]

    D., et al

    Banzatti , A., Pascucci , I., Bosman , A. D., et al. 2020, , 903, 124

    2020

  8. [16]

    M., Chávez, J

    Banzatti, A., Pontoppidan, K. M., Chávez, J. P., et al. 2023, , 165, 72

    2023

  9. [17]

    M., et al

    Banzatti, A., Salyk, C., Pontoppidan, K. M., et al. 2025, , 169, 165

    2025

  10. [18]

    L., Cobos , C

    Baulch , D. L., Cobos , C. J., Cox , R. A., et al. 1992, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 21, 411

    1992

  11. [19]

    2008, , 492, 277

    Bayo , A., Rodrigo , C., Barrado Y Navascu \'e s , D., et al. 2008, , 492, 277

    2008

  12. [20]

    A., Melnick, G

    Bergin, E. A., Melnick, G. J., Gerakines, P. A., Neufeld, D. A., & Whittet, D. C. B. 2005, , 627, L33

    2005

  13. [21]

    2023, , 621, 56

    Bern \'e , O., Martin-Drumel , M.-A., Schroetter , I., et al. 2023, , 621, 56

    2023

  14. [22]

    , Alcalá, J

    Biazzo , Frasca, A. , Alcalá, J. M. , et al. 2017, A&A, 605, A66

    2017

  15. [23]

    , Palla, F

    Biazzo , Randich, S. , Palla, F. , & Briceño, C. 2011, A&A, 530, A19

    2011

  16. [24]

    & Wurm, G

    Blum, J. & Wurm, G. 2008, ARA&A, 46, 21

    2008

  17. [25]

    W., Allamandola , L

    Boersma , C., Bauschlicher , C. W., Allamandola , L. J., et al. 2010, , 511, A32

    2010

  18. [26]

    A., Gerakines, P

    Boogert, A. A., Gerakines, P. A., & Whittet, D. C. 2015, Annu. Rev. Astron., 53, 541–581

    2015

  19. [27]

    2017, A&A, 601, A36

    Bosman , Bruderer, Simon , & van Dishoeck, Ewine F. 2017, A&A, 601, A36

    2017

  20. [28]

    D., Bergin, E

    Bosman, A. D., Bergin, E. A., Calahan, J. K., & Duval, S. E. 2022, , 933, L40

    2022

  21. [29]

    D., Walsh , C., & van Dishoeck , E

    Bosman , A. D., Walsh , C., & van Dishoeck , E. F. 2018, , 618, A182

    2018

  22. [30]

    Boyden, R. D. & Eisner, J. A. 2020, , 894, 74

    2020

  23. [31]

    Boyden , R. D. & Eisner , J. A. 2023, , 947, 7

    2023

  24. [32]

    2012, , 427, 127

    Bressan , A., Marigo , P., Girardi , L., et al. 2012, , 427, 127

    2012

  25. [33]

    D., Kamp, I., Meeus, G., Oudmaijer, R

    Brittain, S. D., Kamp, I., Meeus, G., Oudmaijer, R. D., & Waters, L. B. F. M. 2023, Space Sci. Rev., 219

    2023

  26. [34]

    D., Rettig, T

    Brittain, S. D., Rettig, T. W., Simon, T., & Kulesa, C. 2005, , 626, 283

    2005

  27. [35]

    2013, A&A, 559, A46

    Bruderer . 2013, A&A, 559, A46

    2013

  28. [36]

    Bruderer , S., Harsono , D., & van Dishoeck , E. F. 2015, , 575, A94

    2015

  29. [37]

    F., Doty , S

    Bruderer , S., van Dishoeck , E. F., Doty , S. D., & Herczeg , G. J. 2012, , 541, A91

    2012

  30. [38]

    2023, JWST Calibration Pipeline

    Bushouse , H., Eisenhamer , J., Dencheva , N., et al. 2023, JWST Calibration Pipeline

    2023

  31. [39]

    2004, , 128, 1294

    Calvet, N., Muzerolle, J., Briceño, C., et al. 2004, , 128, 1294

    2004

  32. [40]

    2001, A&A, 367, L1

    Cami & Yamamura . 2001, A&A, 367, L1

    2001

  33. [41]

    Chiang , E. I. & Goldreich , P. 1997, , 490, 368

    1997

  34. [42]

    Ciesla , F. J. & Cuzzi , J. N. 2006, , 181, 178

    2006

  35. [43]

    Clayton , R. N. 1993, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 21, 115

    1993

  36. [44]

    N., Grossman , L., & Mayeda , T

    Clayton , R. N., Grossman , L., & Mayeda , T. K. 1973, Science, 182, 485

    1973

  37. [45]

    Clayton , R. N. & Mayeda , T. K. 1999, , 63, 2089

    1999

  38. [46]

    Coleman , G. A. L. & Haworth , T. J. 2022, , 514, 2315

    2022

  39. [47]

    Concha-Ram \' rez , F., Wilhelm , M. J. C., Portegies Zwart , S., & Haworth , T. J. 2019, , 490, 5678

    2019

  40. [48]

    2003, , 399, 773

    Dartois , E., Dutrey , A., & Guilloteau , S. 2003, , 399, 773

    2003

  41. [49]

    Dawson , R. I. & Johnson , J. A. 2018, , 56, 175

    2018

  42. [50]

    de Graauw , T., Whittet , D. C. B., Gerakines , P. A., et al. 1996, , 315, L345

    1996

  43. [51]

    2023, Faraday Discussions, 245

    Dishoeck, E., Grant, S., Tabone, B., et al. 2023, Faraday Discussions, 245

    2023

  44. [52]

    Dullemond , C. P. & Dominik , C. 2004, , 421, 1075

    2004

  45. [53]

    J., & Bisbas , T

    Facchini , S., Clarke , C. J., & Bisbas , T. G. 2016, , 457, 3593

    2016

  46. [54]

    R., et al

    Fang , M., van Boekel , R., King , R. R., et al. 2012, , 539, A119

    2012

  47. [55]

    & Adams, F

    Fatuzzo, M. & Adams, F. C. 2008, , 675, 1361

    2008

  48. [56]

    2011, , 732, 106

    Fedele, D., Pascucci, I., Brittain, S., et al. 2011, , 732, 106

    2011

  49. [57]

    M., Hughes, A

    Flaherty, K. M., Hughes, A. M., Rosenfeld, K. A., et al. 2015, , 813, 99

    2015

  50. [58]

    W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306–312

    2013

  51. [59]

    , Dharmawardena, T

    Fouesneau , Andrae, R. , Dharmawardena, T. , et al. 2022, A&A, 662, A125

    2022

  52. [60]

    2006, , 459, 837

    Garcia Lopez , R., Natta , A., Testi , L., & Habart , E. 2006, , 459, 837

    2006

  53. [61]

    Gasman , Temmink, Milou , van Dishoeck, Ewine F. , et al. 2025, A&A, 694, A147

    2025

  54. [62]

    , Grant, Sierra L

    Gasman , van Dishoeck, Ewine F. , Grant, Sierra L. , et al. 2023, A&A, 679, A117

    2023

  55. [63]

    V., Feigelson, E

    Getman, K. V., Feigelson, E. D., Kuhn, M. A., et al. 2014, , 787, 108

    2014

  56. [64]

    , Matsuura, M

    Gielen , Van Winckel, H. , Matsuura, M. , et al. 2009, A&A, 503, 843

    2009

  57. [65]

    E., Meijerink, R., & Najita, J

    Glassgold, A. E., Meijerink, R., & Najita, J. R. 2009, , 701, 142

    2009

  58. [66]

    E., Rothman , L

    Gordon , I. E., Rothman , L. S., Hargreaves , R. J., et al. 2022, , 277, 107949

    2022

  59. [67]

    L., van Dishoeck, E

    Grant, S. L., van Dishoeck, E. F., Tabone, B., et al. 2023, , 947, L6

    2023

  60. [68]

    Gray , R. O. & Corbally , J., C. 2009, Stellar Spectral Classification (Princeton University Press)

    2009

  61. [69]

    Gross , R. E. & Cleeves , L. I. 2025, , 980, 189

    2025

  62. [70]

    G., Drake, J

    Guarcello, M. G., Drake, J. J., Wright, N. J., et al. 2023, ApJS, 269, 13

    2023

  63. [71]

    & Blum , J

    Gundlach , B. & Blum , J. 2015, , 798, 34

    2015

  64. [72]

    , & Facchini, S

    Gárate , Pinilla, Paola , Haworth, Thomas J. , & Facchini, S. 2024, A&A, 681, A84

    2024

  65. [73]

    Habing , H. J. 1968, , 19, 421

    1968

  66. [74]

    Haworth , T. J. & Clarke , C. J. 2019, , 485, 3895

    2019

  67. [75]

    J., Clarke, C

    Haworth, T. J., Clarke, C. J., Rahman, W., Winter, A. J., & Facchini, S. 2018, , 481, 452

    2018

  68. [76]

    J., Coleman , G

    Haworth , T. J., Coleman , G. A. L., Qiao , L., Sellek , A. D., & Askari , K. 2023, , 526, 4315

    2023

  69. [77]

    N., Bosman , A

    Heays , A. N., Bosman , A. D., & van Dishoeck , E. F. 2017, , 602, A105

    2017

  70. [78]

    Henney , W. J. & O'Dell , C. R. 1999, , 118, 2350

    1999

  71. [79]

    2024, , 136, 054302

    Henning , T., Kamp , I., Samland , M., et al. 2024, , 136, 054302

    2024

  72. [80]

    2025, , 537

    Houge, A., Krijt, S., Banzatti, A., et al. 2025, , 537

    2025

  73. [81]

    O., Wende-von Berg , S., Dreizler , S., et al

    Husser , T. O., Wende-von Berg , S., Dreizler , S., et al. 2013, , 553, A6

    2013

  74. [82]

    R., Avila , J., Greenwood , R

    Ireland , T. R., Avila , J., Greenwood , R. C., Hicks , L. J., & Bridges , J. C. 2020, , 216, 25

    2020

  75. [83]

    A., Aller, K

    Johnson, J. A., Aller, K. M., Howard, A. W., & Crepp, J. R. 2010, , 122, 905

    2010

  76. [84]

    1998, , 499, 758

    Johnstone , D., Hollenbach , D., & Bally , J. 1998, , 499, 758

    1998

  77. [85]

    C., \'A lvarez-M \'a rquez , J., Sloan , G

    Jones , O. C., \'A lvarez-M \'a rquez , J., Sloan , G. C., et al. 2023, , 523, 2519

    2023

  78. [86]

    , Woitke, P

    Kaeufer , Min, M. , Woitke, P. , Kamp, I. , & Arabhavi, A. M. 2024, A&A, 687, A209

    2024

  79. [87]

    & Dullemond , C

    Kamp , I. & Dullemond , C. P. 2004, , 615, 991

    2004

  80. [88]

    F., & Hogerheijde , M

    Kamp , I., Tilling , I., Woitke , P., Thi , W. F., & Hogerheijde , M. 2010, , 510, A18

    2010

  81. [89]

    2024, , 689, A231

    Kanwar , J., Kamp , I., Jang , H., et al. 2024, , 689, A231

    2024

  82. [90]

    D., Sloan , G

    Keller , L. D., Sloan , G. C., Forrest , W. J., et al. 2008, , 684, 411

    2008

  83. [91]

    & Haworth , T

    Keyte , L. & Haworth , T. J. 2025, , 537, 598

    2025

  84. [92]

    E., Tielens , A

    Kress , M. E., Tielens , A. G. G. M., & Frenklach , M. 2010, ASR, 46, 44

    2010

  85. [93]

    R., McKee , C

    Krumholz , M. R., McKee , C. F., & Bland-Hawthorn , J. 2019, , 57, 227

    2019

  86. [94]

    A., Hillenbrand , L

    Kuhn , M. A., Hillenbrand , L. A., Sills , A., Feigelson , E. D., & Getman , K. V. 2019, , 870, 32

    2019

  87. [95]

    Lada, C. J. & Lada, E. A. 2003, ARA&A, 41, 57

    2003

  88. [96]

    & Johansen , A

    Lambrechts , M. & Johansen , A. 2012, , 544, A32

    2012

  89. [97]

    2015, A&A, 583, A1

    Le Roy , Altwegg, Kathrin , Balsiger, Hans , et al. 2015, A&A, 583, A1

    2015

  90. [98]

    L., Bitsch , B., & Henning , T

    Lienert , J. L., Bitsch , B., & Henning , T. 2024, , 691, A72

    2024

  91. [99]

    2025, , 978, L30

    Long, F., Pascucci, I., Houge, A., et al. 2025, , 978, L30

    2025

  92. [100]

    C., Yin, Q.-Z., Ng, C

    Lu, Z., Chang, Y. C., Yin, Q.-Z., Ng, C. Y., & Jackson, W. M. 2014, Science, 346, 61

    2014

  93. [101]

    Lyons , J. R. & Young , E. D. 2005, , 435, 317

    2005

  94. [102]

    F., Ansdell , M., Rosotti , G

    Manara , C. F., Ansdell , M., Rosotti , G. P., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka , Y. Aikawa , T. Muto , K. Tomida , & M. Tamura , 539

    2023

  95. [103]

    K., Di Francesco, J., Johnstone, D., et al

    Mann, R. K., Di Francesco, J., Johnstone, D., et al. 2014, , 784, 82

    2014

  96. [104]

    2001, , 121, 1050

    Massey , P., DeGioia-Eastwood , K., & Waterhouse , E. 2001, , 121, 1050

    2001

  97. [105]

    , Di Carlo, E

    Massi , Giannetti, A. , Di Carlo, E. , et al. 2015, A&A, 573, A95

    2015

  98. [106]

    J., et al

    McElroy , D., Walsh , C., Markwick , A. J., et al. 2013, , 550, A36

    2013

  99. [107]

    Meeus , Waters, L. B. F. M. , Bouwman, J. , et al. 2001, A&A, 365, 476

    2001

  100. [108]

    M., Blake, G

    Meijerink, R., Pontoppidan, K. M., Blake, G. A., Poelman, D. R., & Dullemond, C. P. 2009, , 704, 1471

    2009

  101. [109]

    N., Savage, C., Brewster, M

    Milam, S. N., Savage, C., Brewster, M. A., Ziurys, L. M., & Wyckoff, S. 2005, , 634, 1126

    2005

  102. [110]

    , & van Dishoeck, E

    Miotello , Bruderer, S. , & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2014, A&A, 572, A96

    2014

  103. [111]

    & Kamp , I

    Molano , G. & Kamp , I. 2012 a , , 537, A138

    2012

  104. [112]

    & Kamp , I

    Molano , G. & Kamp , I. 2012 b , , 547, A7

    2012

  105. [113]

    2012, , 541, A97

    Mordasini , C., Alibert , Y., Benz , W., Klahr , H., & Henning , T. 2012, , 541, A97

    2012

  106. [114]

    2012, A&A, 539, A9

    Mulders & Dominik . 2012, A&A, 539, A9

    2012

  107. [115]

    Ndugu , N., Bitsch , B., & Lienert , J. L. 2024, , 691, A32

    2024

  108. [116]

    I., Murray-Clay , R., & Bergin , E

    \"O berg , K. I., Murray-Clay , R., & Bergin , E. A. 2011, , 743, L16

    2011

  109. [117]

    J., & Nelson , R

    Paine , S., Haworth , T. J., & Nelson , R. P. 2025,

    2025

  110. [118]

    S., & Bruderer, S

    Pascucci, I., Herczeg, G., Carr, J. S., & Bruderer, S. 2013, , 779, 178

    2013

  111. [119]

    Pecaut , M. J. & Mamajek , E. E. 2013, , 208, 9

    2013

  112. [120]

    Penzias , A. A. 1981, , 249, 518

    1981

  113. [121]

    2023, , 620, 516

    Perotti , G., Christiaens , V., Henning , T., et al. 2023, , 620, 516

    2023

  114. [122]

    , Birnstiel, T

    Pinilla , Klarmann, L. , Birnstiel, T. , et al. 2016, A&A, 585, A35

    2016

  115. [123]

    A., Öberg, K

    Piso, A.-M. A., Öberg, K. I., Birnstiel, T., & Murray-Clay, R. A. 2015, , 815, 109

    2015

  116. [124]

    Pontoppidan , K. M. & Blevins , S. M. 2014, Faraday Discussions, 168, 49

    2014

  117. [125]

    M., Salyk, C., Blake, G

    Pontoppidan, K. M., Salyk, C., Blake, G. A., et al. 2010, , 720, 887

    2010

  118. [126]

    V., Ramírez-Tannus, M

    Portilla-Revelo, B., Getman, K. V., Ramírez-Tannus, M. C., et al. 2025, , 985, 72

    2025

  119. [127]

    2020, JOSS, 5, 2308

    Prochaska , J., Hennawi , J., Westfall , K., et al. 2020, JOSS, 5, 2308

    2020

  120. [128]

    Qiao , L., Coleman , G. A. L., & Haworth , T. J. 2023, , 522, 1939

    2023

  121. [129]

    2018, , 609, A91

    Rab , C., G \"u del , M., Woitke , P., et al. 2018, , 609, A91

    2018

  122. [130]

    C., Backs , F., Bik , A., et al

    Ramirez-Tannus , M. C., Backs , F., Bik , A., et al. 2021, JWST Proposal. Cycle 1, ID. \#1759

    2021

  123. [131]

    C., Poorta , J., Bik , A., et al

    Ram \' rez-Tannus , M. C., Poorta , J., Bik , A., et al. 2020, , 633, A155

    2020

  124. [132]

    C., Bik, A., Cuijpers, L., et al

    Ramírez-Tannus, M. C., Bik, A., Cuijpers, L., et al. 2023, , 958, L30

    2023

  125. [133]

    C., Bik, A., Getman, K

    Ramírez-Tannus, M. C., Bik, A., Getman, K. V., et al. 2025

    2025

  126. [134]

    2015, , 574, A116

    Reffert , S., Bergmann , C., Quirrenbach , A., Trifonov , T., & K \"u nstler , A. 2015, , 574, A116

    2015

  127. [135]

    Richert , A. J. W., Getman , K. V., Feigelson , E. D., et al. 2018, , 477, 5191

    2018

  128. [136]

    H., Wright, G

    Rieke, G. H., Wright, G. S., Böker, T., et al. 2015, PASP, 127, 584

    2015

  129. [137]

    2011, , 733, 113

    Roccatagliata, V., Bouwman, J., Henning, T., et al. 2011, , 733, 113

    2011

  130. [138]

    , Bouret, J

    Russeil , Adami, C. , Bouret, J. C. , et al. 2017, A&A, 607, A86

    2017

  131. [139]

    M., Banzatti , A., et al

    Salyk , C., Pontoppidan , K. M., Banzatti , A., et al. 2025, , 169, 184

    2025

  132. [140]

    M., Blake, G

    Salyk, C., Pontoppidan, K. M., Blake, G. A., et al. 2008, ApJ, 676, L49

    2008

  133. [141]

    & Clarke , C

    Scally , A. & Clarke , C. 2001, , 325, 449

    2001

  134. [142]

    R., Henning , T., Christiaens , V., et al

    Schwarz , K. R., Henning , T., Christiaens , V., et al. 2024, , 962, 8

    2024

  135. [143]

    D., Booth , R

    Sellek , A. D., Booth , R. A., & Clarke , C. J. 2020, , 492, 1279

    2020

  136. [144]

    D., Vlasblom , M., & van Dishoeck , E

    Sellek , A. D., Vlasblom , M., & van Dishoeck , E. F. 2025, , 694, A79

    2025

  137. [145]

    H., Najita , J

    Shu , F. H., Najita , J. R., Shang , H., & Li , Z. Y. 2000, in Protostars and Planets IV, ed. V. Mannings , A. P. Boss , & S. S. Russell , 789--814

    2000

  138. [146]

    Smith , I. W. M., Herbst , E., & Chang , Q. 2004, , 350, 323

    2004

  139. [147]

    L., Pontoppidan, K

    Smith, R. L., Pontoppidan, K. M., Young, E. D., & Morris, M. R. 2015, , 813, 120

    2015

  140. [148]

    L., Pontoppidan, K

    Smith, R. L., Pontoppidan, K. M., Young, E. D., Morris, M. R., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2009, , 701, 163–175

    2009

  141. [149]

    M., Hogerheijde , M

    Stapper , L. M., Hogerheijde , M. R., van Dishoeck , E. F., et al. 2025, , 693, A49

    2025

  142. [150]

    M., Hogerheijde , M

    Stapper , L. M., Hogerheijde , M. R., van Dishoeck , E. F., & Mentel , R. 2022, , 658, A112

    2022

  143. [151]

    Stevenson, D. J. & Lunine, J. I. 1988, Icarus, 75, 146

    1988

  144. [152]

    R., Ghez, A

    Stolte, A., Morris, M. R., Ghez, A. M., et al. 2010, , 718, 810

    2010

  145. [153]

    F., et al

    Tabone , B., Bettoni , G., van Dishoeck , E. F., et al. 2023, Nat. Astron., 7, 805

    2023

  146. [154]

    P., Duke, M

    Taylor, H. P., Duke, M. B., Silver, L. T., & Epstein, S. 1965, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 29, 489

    1965

  147. [155]

    F., Gasman , D., et al

    Temmink , M., van Dishoeck , E. F., Gasman , D., et al. 2024 a , , 689, A330

    2024

  148. [156]

    F., Grant , S

    Temmink , M., van Dishoeck , E. F., Grant , S. L., et al. 2024 b , , 686, A117

    2024

  149. [157]

    F., Woitke , P., & Kamp , I

    Thi , W. F., Woitke , P., & Kamp , I. 2011, , 412, 711

    2011

  150. [158]

    Thiemens, M. H. & Heidenreich, J. E. 1983, Science, 219, 1073

    1983

  151. [159]

    Throop, H. B. & Bally, J. 2005, , 623, L149

    2005

  152. [160]

    Valegård , Waters, L. B. F. M. , & Dominik, C. 2021, A&A, 652, A133

    2021

  153. [161]

    van Boekel , R., Min , M., Waters , L. B. F. M., et al. 2005, , 437, 189

    2005

  154. [162]

    van Terwisga , van Dishoeck, E. F. , Mann, R. K. , et al. 2020, A&A, 640, A27

    2020

  155. [163]

    E., Hacar , A., & van Dishoeck , E

    van Terwisga , S. E., Hacar , A., & van Dishoeck , E. F. 2019, , 628, A85

    2019

  156. [164]

    2003, Annu

    Van Winckel, H. 2003, Annu. Rev. Astron., 41, 391

    2003

  157. [165]

    van Zadelhoff , van Dishoeck, E. F. , Thi, W.-F. , & Blake, G. A. 2001, A&A, 377, 566

    2001

  158. [166]

    Visser , van Dishoeck, E. F. , & Black, J. H. 2009, A&A, 503, 323

    2009

  159. [167]

    C., Dullemond , C

    Visser , R., Geers , V. C., Dullemond , C. P., et al. 2007, , 466, 229

    2007

  160. [168]

    L., et al

    Vlasblom , M., Temmink , M., Grant , S. L., et al. 2025, , 693, A278

    2025

  161. [169]

    R., Howarth , I

    Walborn , N. R., Howarth , I. D., Lennon , D. J., et al. 2002, , 123, 2754

    2002

  162. [170]

    2015, A&A, 582, A88

    Walsh , Nomura, Hideko , & van Dishoeck, Ewine . 2015, A&A, 582, A88

    2015

  163. [171]

    J., & Nomura , H

    Walsh , C., Millar , T. J., & Nomura , H. 2013, , 766, L23

    2013

  164. [172]

    2015, PASP, 127, 646

    Wells, M., Pel, J.-W., Glasse, A., et al. 2015, PASP, 127, 646

    2015

  165. [173]

    Wilson , T. L. & Rood , R. 1994, , 32, 191

    1994

  166. [174]

    Winn, J. N. & Fabrycky, D. C. 2015, ARA&A, 53, 409

    2015

  167. [175]

    J., Clarke , C

    Winter , A. J., Clarke , C. J., Rosotti , G., et al. 2018, , 478, 2700

    2018

  168. [176]

    Winter , A. J. & Haworth , T. J. 2022, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 137, 1132

    2022

  169. [177]

    J., Kruijssen , J

    Winter , A. J., Kruijssen , J. M. D., Chevance , M., Keller , B. W., & Longmore , S. N. 2020, , 491, 903

    2020

  170. [178]

    , Pinte, C

    Woitke , Min, M. , Pinte, C. , et al. 2016, A&A, 586, A103

    2016

  171. [179]

    F., Arabhavi , A

    Woitke , P., Thi , W. F., Arabhavi , A. M., et al. 2024 a , , 683, A219

    2024

  172. [180]

    F., Arabhavi , A

    Woitke , P., Thi , W. F., Arabhavi , A. M., et al. 2024 b , , 683, A219

    2024

  173. [181]

    S., Wright, D., Goodson, G

    Wright, G. S., Wright, D., Goodson, G. B., et al. 2015, , 127, 595

    2015

  174. [182]

    2025, , 696, A99

    Zannese , M., Tabone , B., Habart , E., et al. 2025, , 696, A99

    2025

  175. [183]

    2024, Nat

    Zannese , M., Tabone , B., Habart , E., et al. 2024, Nat. Astron., 8, 577

    2024

  176. [184]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sent...

  177. [185]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.