Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Strong Convergence of Multiplicative Brownian Motions on the General Linear Group

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that multiplicative Brownian motions on GL_N(C) converge strongly to the free multiplicative Brownian motion for every admissible variance-covariance pair.

desk verdict New interpolation method and a substantial result if true, but a false equality of left- and right-invariant laws sinks the main proof as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.13922 v1 pith:2RFRLHJM submitted 2025-07-18 math.PR math-phmath.MP

Marwa Banna , Mireille Capitaine , Guillaume Cébron This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PRmath-phmath.MP MSC 60B1060B2046L5422E30
keywords multiplicativeBrownianmotiongenerallineargroupstrongconvergencefreeprobabilityrandommatricesoperatornormspectralinclusion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that the multiplicative $(\lambda,\tau)$-Brownian motion $G_{\lambda,\tau}(t)$ on $GL_N(\mathbb{C})$ strongly converges, as $N\to\infty$, to the free multiplicative $(\lambda,\tau)$-Brownian motion $g_{\lambda,\tau}(t)$, for every admissible variance $\lambda\ge0$ and complex covariance $\tau$. Almost surely, for any fixed times and any noncommutative polynomial $P$, both the normalized trace $\mathrm{tr}_N\,P(G_t,G_t^*,G_t^{-1},(G_t^{-1})^*,A_N)$ and the operator norm $\|P(\cdot)\|$ converge to their free counterparts, with deterministic matrices $A_N$ allowed to converge strongly as well. This strengthens the previously known convergence in $*$-distribution, which does not control spectra because $G_t$ is not normal. It extends the unitary case $(\lambda,\tau)=(1,0)$ to the full family of Brownian motions on $GL_N(\mathbb{C})$ introduced in [32].

What carries the argument

The proof is carried by a multiplicative interpolation scheme together with a sharp estimate on the mean trace of products of resolvents and monomials (Theorem 5.1). One interpolates between the left-invariant Brownian motion $G$ and a right-invariant independent copy $\widetilde{G}$ (or a large-dimension copy $K$), using the equality of their one-time laws (Proposition 6.9) to cancel the first-order drift terms and leaving only trace-type quadratic-covariation terms. The surviving terms are bounded by rewriting them as covariances of normalized traces and applying a variance estimate (Theorem 1.3) of order $O(1/N^4)$ for $C^3$ functions with compact support, obtained via the Helffer–Sjöstrand representation formula and a Borel–Cantelli eigenvalue-counting argument.

What would settle it

Compute the generator of the right-invariant multiplicative Brownian motion on pure trace polynomials and compare it with the operator $\Delta$ from Lemma 6.1; a mismatch for any admissible $(\lambda,\tau)$ (e.g. a non-real $\tau$) would falsify Proposition 6.9 and break the covariance estimates.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central assertion is Corollary 1.2: for any admissible $(\lambda,\tau)$, the finite-dimensional marginals of $G_{\lambda,\tau}$ converge almost surely in the strong sense to the free multiplicative $(\lambda,\tau)$-Brownian motion $g$ that is free from the strong limit $a$ of the deterministic matrices. The norm convergence is obtained from a spectral-inclusion theorem (Theorem 1.1): almost surely, for large $N$, the spectrum of any self-adjoint polynomial in the Brownian motions at several times, their inverses and adjoints, and the deterministic matrices is contained in a $\delta$-neighborhood of the spectrum of the same polynomial in the free variables. Because the free tuple is shown to be strongly convergent, Proposition 2.2 converts this inclusion into the equality of norms.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the left-invariant Brownian motion and its right-invariant counterpart driven by the same noise have the same one-time distribution for all allowed parameters; this one-paragraph claim is not automatic because the inner product on the Lie algebra is not Ad-invariant.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every admissible $(\lambda,\tau)$, the empirical spectral measure of any fixed polynomial in $G_{\lambda,\tau}(t)$ and its inverse and adjoint converges almost surely, and the spectrum converges in Hausdorff distance to the free limit.
  • The result holds jointly with any strongly convergent family of deterministic matrices $A_N$, so the Brownian motion can be combined with other strongly convergent variables in a free probability model.
  • The variance estimate $\mathrm{Var}[\mathrm{tr}_N f(P P^*(G_t,\dots))] = O(1/N^4)$ for compactly supported $C^3$ functions is quantitative and may be used as input for fluctuation results at the scale $1/N$.
  • Weak convergence of finite-dimensional marginals (Theorem 3.2) is established with an explicit $O(1/N^2)$ error using the pure trace polynomial generator.
  • The spectral-inclusion theorem applies to multi-time marginals, not just a fixed time, because of the stationary independent multiplicative increments of the process.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The equality of left- and right-invariant laws (Proposition 6.9) is the load-bearing hinge; a direct computation of the pure-trace generator of the right-invariant process would either confirm or refute it for all admissible $(\lambda,\tau)$, and the proof would likely adapt if only a weaker comparison (up to $O(1/N^2)$) held.
  • The interpolation technique appears to be insensitive to the specific values of $\lambda$ and $\tau$ beyond the trace form of the quadratic covariations, so the same scheme may prove strong convergence for other multiplicative diffusions with additional drifts or different noise laws.
  • A concrete test is to compute the limiting variance in Theorem 1.3 for the complex case $(\lambda,\tau)=(1,1)$ and compare it with known fluctuation results for unitary Brownian motion, probing whether the $O(1/N^4)$ rate is sharp in the non-normal regime.
  • The spectral-inclusion approach could yield quantitative bounds on the norm of polynomials as $N$ grows, once the dependence of the constants on $\delta$ and the polynomial degree is made explicit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the family of multiplicative (λ,τ)-Brownian motions on GL_N(C) introduced by Driver–Hall–Kemp, and claims almost sure strong convergence of their finite-dimensional marginals, jointly with strongly converging deterministic matrices, to the corresponding free multiplicative (λ,τ)-Brownian motion. The proof strategy is a multiplicative interpolation between the matrix process and the free process, combined with an estimate of the covariance of smooth functions of polynomials in the matrix process, Helffer–Sjöstrand representation, and a Borel–Cantelli step. The paper also contains an appendix proving weak convergence with an O(1/N^2) rate.

Significance. If the main theorem were established, it would be a substantial extension of strong convergence for multiplicative Brownian motions from the unitary case (λ,τ)=(1,0) of Collins–Dahlqvist–Kemp to the full two-parameter family, and the proposed multiplicative interpolation would be a novel technical contribution. The appendix's self-contained proof of weak convergence at rate O(1/N^2) is also a useful contribution. However, the central variance estimate that drives the main theorem depends on a claimed equality of laws (Proposition 6.9) that is false for general admissible (λ,τ); accordingly, the main results are not supported by the present proof.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 6.2, Proposition 6.9] Proposition 6.9 is false for general admissible (λ,τ). The reasoning that the left-invariant and right-invariant Laplacians are 'relative to one same and single metric' is not valid: a left-invariant metric and a right-invariant metric determined by the same inner product at the identity coincide only when that inner product is Ad(GL_N(C))-invariant, and the Hilbert–Schmidt inner product Tr(A*B) is not Ad(GL_N(C))-invariant. Concretely, let N≥2, λ>0, and compare the two generators at g0=[[1,1],[0,1]] acting on f(g)=g_{11}\overline{g_{21}}. For the left-invariant process dG_t = G_t dZ_t, the Itô correction gives (λ/N)(g0 g0^*)_{12}=λ/N, while for the right-invariant process d\tilde G_t = dZ_t \tilde G_t it gives (λ/N)δ_{12}(...)=0, using d⟨Z_{ij},\bar Z_{kl}⟩=(λ/N)δ_{ik}δ_{jl}dt. The two generators are therefore different operators. The cited [26, Theorem 2.7] does not justify the claimed equality because it concerns heat kernels for a common metric. Thus the equality of the one-time laws of G_t and \tilde G_t is not established and is, in fact, false for general parameters.
  2. [Section 4, Lemma 4.1 and Eq. (24)] Lemma 4.1 explicitly relies on Proposition 6.9 to assert that \tilde Q_{t,0} and \hat Q_{t,0} are independent copies of Q(G_t). Since Proposition 6.9 fails, the endpoint identification h(0)=E[tr R_1(\tilde G_t)]E[tr R_2(\hat G_t)] = (E tr R(G_t))^2 is false, and the derivative computation in (28)–(34) no longer computes the covariance of the two resolvent traces. Consequently the variance estimate (24), which is the basis for the Borel–Cantelli step and for Theorem 1.1, is not established.
  3. [Section 4, paragraph after Eq. (38)] The proof that P P*(gu \hat g_{t-u}, A_N) shares the same spectrum as P P*(g_t, A_N) relies on Proposition 6.10, which is itself derived from Proposition 6.9 and inherits its failure. The same flaw therefore invalidates the claimed O(1/N^4) variance bound for the functions f_{N,δ}, and with it the spectral inclusion argument leading to Theorem 1.1.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (27)] In the second SDE of (27), the initial condition is written G^{(ℓ)}_{λ,τ}(0)=I_N, but the process being defined is \hat G^{(ℓ)}_{λ,τ}; this is a typo.
  2. [Section 3, first paragraph] The text refers to 'the multi-time statement in Theorem 1.2', but no Theorem 1.2 is stated; the intended reference is likely Theorem 1.1 or Corollary 1.2.
  3. [Proof of Proposition 5.4] The sentence beginning 'for any s1 and s2' is incomplete; it appears to be a leftover from an earlier draft.
  4. [Abstract] The phrase 'almost sure strong convergence' is slightly nonstandard, since strong convergence in this context already includes an almost sure statement; this is a wording issue.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the free limiting process is defined independently by a free SDE, and the convergence to it is proved by explicit generator computations rather than assumed.

full rationale

The central claim is not built from its own conclusion. The free multiplicative (λ,τ)-Brownian motion g is defined in Section 2 independently as the solution of the free SDE (6), while the matrix process G is defined by the parallel matrix SDE (4)/(17). The weak convergence result (Theorem 3.2) is proved in Section 6.1 by explicitly computing the pure-trace generator ∆ for the finite-N process and the free generator, then bounding the Duhamel difference in O(1/N^2) (Proposition 6.3). The strong-convergence argument (Theorem 5.1, Lemma 4.1, and the variance estimate (24)) is an interpolation framework adapted from Collins–Guionnet–Parraud, an external technique, and it compares finite-N objects to the same independently defined free object. No parameter is fitted to the target quantity, and no 'prediction' is defined as a fitted value. The paper does cite prior work by the authors, notably [14] for a technical semigroup lemma and the original special-case weak convergence, [18] for a Duhamel formula, [22] for the unitary case, and [23, 62] for the interpolation strategy; these are background tools and external techniques, not the theorem being proved. A fragile point is Proposition 6.9, whose proof that the left- and right-invariant processes have the same one-time law is a short argument invoking [26, Theorem 2.7] and the phrase 'one same and single metric'; if that equality fails for the general linear group with the Hilbert–Schmidt inner product, Lemma 4.1 and the O(1/N^4) variance estimate would not be established. That is a genuine correctness risk, but it is not circularity: it does not make the claimed convergence equivalent to its input. The independent definition of g and the self-contained generator computation keep the derivation non-circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters: λ and τ are fixed inputs of the model, and σ_l are time increments. The proof relies on background free probability and free Ito calculus, and on the equality of left/right heat kernels, which is the least externally grounded input.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Free product C*-probability spaces with faithful traces exist and contain freely independent copies of the free multiplicative Brownian motion and the deterministic matrices (Theorem 2.1).
    Invoked throughout to define (A_N, phi_N) and the limiting objects; based on Nica-Speicher free product theory.
  • standard math Free stochastic calculus and free Ito rules for the limiting free multiplicative Brownian motion (Biane-Speicher, Hall-Ho).
    Used in the appendix to identify the limit and in Section 4 to define the free processes; standard background.
  • domain assumption Left- and right-invariant multiplicative (λ,τ)-Brownian motions have the same one-time law (Proposition 6.9).
    Used in Lemma 4.1 and Step 3 to identify tilde-G and hat-G with same-law copies of G; the proof is a one-paragraph appeal to [26, Theorem 2.7] and is not independently verified.
  • domain assumption The deterministic matrices A_N are uniformly bounded and converge strongly to a free limit a.
    This is part of the theorem's hypothesis and is required for the spectral inclusion and norm convergence statements.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Strong Convergence of Multiplicative Brownian Motions on the General Linear Group." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2RFRLHJM

@misc{pith2026250713922,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Strong Convergence of Multiplicative Brownian Motions on the General Linear Group},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2RFRLHJM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.13922}
}
abstract

We consider the family of multiplicative Brownian motions $G_{\lambda,\tau}$ on the general linear group introduced by Driver-Hall-Kemp. They are parametrized by the real variance $\lambda\in \mathbb{R}$ and the complex covariance $\tau \in \mathbb{C}$ of the underlying elliptic Brownian motion. We show the almost sure strong convergence of the finite-dimensional marginals of $G_{\lambda,\tau}$ to the corresponding free multiplicative Brownian motion introduced by Hall-Ho: as the dimension tends to infinity, not only does the noncommutative distribution converge almost surely, but the operator norm does as well. This result generalizes the work of Collins-Dahlqvist-Kemp for the special case $(\lambda,\tau)=(1,0)$ which corresponds to the Brownian motion on the unitary group. Actually, this strong convergence remains valid when the family of multiplicative Brownian motions $G_{\lambda,\tau}$ is considered alongside a family of strongly converging deterministic matrices.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Eigenvalues of Brownian Motions on $\mathrm{GL}(N,\mathbb{C})$

    math.PR 2025-11 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    As N → ∞, the empirical eigenvalue law of Brownian motion on GL(N,C) converges almost surely to the Brown measure of a free multiplicative Brownian motion, settling Biane's 1997 conjecture.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Extremal singular values of random matrix products and Brownian motion on GL(N, C)

    Andrew Ahn. Extremal singular values of random matrix products and Brownian motion on GL(N, C). Probability Theory and Related Fields, 187(3):949–997, 2023

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    The Segal–Bargmann transform for two dimensional quantum Yang–Mills

    Sergio Albeverio, B Hall, and A Sengupta. The Segal–Bargmann transform for two dimensional quantum Yang–Mills. Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability and Related Topics, 2(1), 1999

    work page 1999

  3. [3]

    Anderson

    Greg W. Anderson. Convergence of the largest singular value of a polynomial in independent Wigner matrices. Ann. Probab., 41(3B):2103–2181, 2013

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    Quantum free Yang–Mills on the plane.Journal of Geometry and Physics, 62(2):330–343, 2012

    Michael Anshelevich and Ambar N Sengupta. Quantum free Yang–Mills on the plane.Journal of Geometry and Physics, 62(2):330–343, 2012. 39

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    Bandeira, March T

    Afonso S. Bandeira, March T. Boedihardjo, and Ramon van Handel. Matrix concentration in- equalities and free probability.Invent. Math., 234(1):419–487, 2023

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    S. T. Belinschi and M. Capitaine. Spectral properties of polynomials in independent Wigner and deterministic matrices. J. Funct. Anal., 273(12):3901–3963, 2017

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Strong convergence of tensor products of independent G.U.E

    Serban Belinschi and Mireille Capitaine. Strong convergence of tensor products of independent G.U.E. matrices, 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Free Brownian motion, free stochastic calculus and random matrice, in free probability theory.Fields Inst

    Philippe Biane. Free Brownian motion, free stochastic calculus and random matrice, in free probability theory.Fields Inst. Commun., 12:1–19, 1997

    work page 1997

Show all 76 references
  1. [9]

    Segal–Bargmann transform, functional calculus on matrix spaces and the theory of semi-circular and circular systems.Journal of Functional Analysis, 144(1):232–286, 1997

    Philippe Biane. Segal–Bargmann transform, functional calculus on matrix spaces and the theory of semi-circular and circular systems.Journal of Functional Analysis, 144(1):232–286, 1997

    1997

  2. [10]

    Stochastic calculus with respect to free Brownian motion and analysis on Wigner space.Probab

    Philippe Biane and Roland Speicher. Stochastic calculus with respect to free Brownian motion and analysis on Wigner space.Probab. Theory Related Fields, 112(3):373–409, 1998

    1998

  3. [11]

    Eigenvalues of random lifts and polynomials of random permutation matrices

    Charles Bordenave and Benoît Collins. Eigenvalues of random lifts and polynomials of random permutation matrices. Ann. of Math. (2), 190(3):811–875, 2019

    2019

  4. [12]

    Norm of matrix-valued polynomials in random unitaries and permutations, 2024

    Charles Bordenave and Benoit Collins. Norm of matrix-valued polynomials in random unitaries and permutations, 2024

    2024

  5. [13]

    Strong asymptotic freeness for Wigner and Wishart matrices

    Mireille Capitaine and Catherine Donati-Martin. Strong asymptotic freeness for Wigner and Wishart matrices. Indiana University Mathematics Journal, pages 767–803, 2007

    2007

  6. [14]

    Free convolution operators and free Hall transform.Journal of Functional Analysis, 265(11):2645–2708, 2013

    Guillaume Cébron. Free convolution operators and free Hall transform.Journal of Functional Analysis, 265(11):2645–2708, 2013

    2013

  7. [15]

    The generalized master fields.Journal of Geometry and Physics, 119:34–53, 2017

    Guillaume Cébron, Antoine Dahlqvist, and Franck Gabriel. The generalized master fields.Journal of Geometry and Physics, 119:34–53, 2017

    2017

  8. [16]

    Freeness of typeb and conditional freeness for random matrices.Indiana Univ

    Guillaume Cébron, Antoine Dahlqvist, and Franck Gabriel. Freeness of typeb and conditional freeness for random matrices.Indiana Univ. Math. J., 73(3), 2024

    2024

  9. [17]

    Segal–Bargmann transform: the q-deformation.Letters in Mathematical Physics, 108:1677–1715, 2018

    Guillaume Cébron and Ching-Wei Ho. Segal–Bargmann transform: the q-deformation.Letters in Mathematical Physics, 108:1677–1715, 2018

    2018

  10. [18]

    Fluctuations of Brownian motions onGLN

    Guillaume Cébron and Todd Kemp. Fluctuations of Brownian motions onGLN. In Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare (B) Probabilites et statistiques, volume 58, pages 524–547. Institut Henri Poincaré, 2022

    2022

  11. [19]

    The Segal-Bargmann transform on classical matrix lie groups.Journal of Functional Analysis, 278(9):108430, 2020

    Alice Z Chan. The Segal-Bargmann transform on classical matrix lie groups.Journal of Functional Analysis, 278(9):108430, 2020

    2020

  12. [20]

    Tropp, and Ramon van Handel

    Chi-Fang Chen, Jorge Garza-Vargas, Joel A. Tropp, and Ramon van Handel. A new approach to strong convergence, 2024

    2024

  13. [21]

    A new approach to strong conver- gence II

    Chi-Fang Chen, Jorge Garza-Vargas, and Ramon van Handel. A new approach to strong conver- gence II. the classical ensembles, 2024. 40

    2024

  14. [22]

    The spectral edge of unitary Brownian motion

    Benoît Collins, Antoine Dahlqvist, and Todd Kemp. The spectral edge of unitary Brownian motion. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields, 170(1-2):49–93, 2018

    2018

  15. [23]

    On the operator norm of non-commutative polynomials in deterministic matrices and iid GUE matrices

    Benoît Collins, Alice Guionnet, and Félix Parraud. On the operator norm of non-commutative polynomials in deterministic matrices and iid GUE matrices. Camb. J. Math., 10(1):195–260, 2022

    2022

  16. [24]

    The strong asymptotic freeness of Haar and deterministic matrices

    Benoît Collins and Camille Male. The strong asymptotic freeness of Haar and deterministic matrices. Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4), 47(1):147–163, 2014

    2014

  17. [25]

    Free energies and fluctuations for the unitary Brownian motion.Communi- cations in Mathematical Physics, 348:395–444, 2016

    Antoine Dahlqvist. Free energies and fluctuations for the unitary Brownian motion.Communi- cations in Mathematical Physics, 348:395–444, 2016

    2016

  18. [26]

    On the Kakutani-Itô-Segal-Gross and Segal-Bargmann-Hall isomorphisms.Jour- nal of Functional Analysis, 133(1):69–128, 1995

    Bruce K Driver. On the Kakutani-Itô-Segal-Gross and Segal-Bargmann-Hall isomorphisms.Jour- nal of Functional Analysis, 133(1):69–128, 1995

    1995

  19. [27]

    The Makeenko–Migdal equa- tion for Yang–Mills theory on compact surfaces

    Bruce K Driver, Franck Gabriel, Brian C Hall, and Todd Kemp. The Makeenko–Migdal equa- tion for Yang–Mills theory on compact surfaces. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 352(3):967–978, 2017

    2017

  20. [28]

    The Brown measure of the free multiplicative Brownian motion.Probability Theory and Related Fields, 184(1):209–273, 2022

    Bruce K Driver, Brian Hall, and Todd Kemp. The Brown measure of the free multiplicative Brownian motion.Probability Theory and Related Fields, 184(1):209–273, 2022

    2022

  21. [29]

    Yang–Mills theory and the Segal–Bargmann transform.Com- munications in mathematical physics, 201(2):249–290, 1999

    Bruce K Driver and Brian C Hall. Yang–Mills theory and the Segal–Bargmann transform.Com- munications in mathematical physics, 201(2):249–290, 1999

    1999

  22. [30]

    The large- N limit of the Segal–Bargmann transform on UN

    Bruce K Driver, Brian C Hall, and Todd Kemp. The large- N limit of the Segal–Bargmann transform on UN. Journal of Functional Analysis, 265(11):2585–2644, 2013

    2013

  23. [31]

    Three proofs of the Makeenko–Migdal equation for Yang–Mills theory on the plane.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 351:741–774, 2017

    Bruce K Driver, Brian C Hall, and Todd Kemp. Three proofs of the Makeenko–Migdal equation for Yang–Mills theory on the plane.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 351:741–774, 2017

    2017

  24. [32]

    The complex-time Segal–Bargmann transform

    Bruce K Driver, Brian C Hall, and Todd Kemp. The complex-time Segal–Bargmann transform. Journal of Functional Analysis, 278(1):108303, 2020

    2020

  25. [33]

    Support of the Brown measure of free multiplicative Brownian motions with non-negative initial conditions and its three-parameter family.PhD Dissertation, 2024

    Sorawit Eaknipitsari. Support of the Brown measure of free multiplicative Brownian motions with non-negative initial conditions and its three-parameter family.PhD Dissertation, 2024

    2024

  26. [34]

    Mastering the master field.Nuclear Physics B, 451(1- 2):379–415, 1995

    Rajesh Gopakumar and David J Gross. Mastering the master field.Nuclear Physics B, 451(1- 2):379–415, 1995

    1995

  27. [35]

    Infinite prod- ucts of large random matrices and matrix-valued diffusion.Nuclear Physics B, 670(3):479–507, 2003

    Ewa Gudowska-Nowak, Romuald A Janik, Jerzy Jurkiewicz, and Maciej A Nowak. Infinite prod- ucts of large random matrices and matrix-valued diffusion.Nuclear Physics B, 670(3):479–507, 2003

    2003

  28. [36]

    A random matrix approach to the lack of projections inC∗ red(F2)

    Uffe Haagerup, Hanne Schultz, and Steen Thorbjørnsen. A random matrix approach to the lack of projections inC∗ red(F2). Adv. Math., 204(1):1–83, 2006

    2006

  29. [37]

    A new application of random matrices: Ext(C∗ red(F2)) is not a group.Annals of Mathematics, pages 711–775, 2005

    Uffe Haagerup and Steen Thorbjørnsen. A new application of random matrices: Ext(C∗ red(F2)) is not a group.Annals of Mathematics, pages 711–775, 2005. 41

    2005

  30. [38]

    L’exponentielle stochastique des groupes de lie

    M Hakim-Dowek and Dominique Lépingle. L’exponentielle stochastique des groupes de lie. In Séminaire de Probabilités XX 1984/85: Proceedings, pages 352–374. Springer, 2006

    1984

  31. [39]

    Coherent states and the quantization of (1+ 1)-dimensional Yang–Mills theory

    Brian C Hall. Coherent states and the quantization of (1+ 1)-dimensional Yang–Mills theory. Reviews in Mathematical Physics, 13(10):1281–1305, 2001

    2001

  32. [40]

    Hall and Ching-Wei Ho

    Brian C. Hall and Ching-Wei Ho. The Brown measure of a family of free multiplicative Brownian motions. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields, 186(3-4):1081–1166, 2023

    2023

  33. [41]

    Brown measure support and the free multiplicative Brownian motion

    Brian C Hall and Todd Kemp. Brown measure support and the free multiplicative Brownian motion. Advances in Mathematics, 355:106771, 2019

    2019

  34. [42]

    coherent state

    Brian Charles Hall. The Segal-Bargmann "coherent state" transform for compact lie groups. Journal of Functional Analysis, 122(1):103–151, 1994

    1994

  35. [43]

    A random matrix approach to the Peterson-Thom conjecture.Indiana Univ

    Ben Hayes. A random matrix approach to the Peterson-Thom conjecture.Indiana Univ. Math. J., 71(3):1243–1297, 2022

    2022

  36. [44]

    Consequences of the random matrix solution to the Peterson-Thom conjecture, 2024

    Ben Hayes, David Jekel, and Srivatsav Kunnawalkam Elayavalli. Consequences of the random matrix solution to the Peterson-Thom conjecture, 2024

    2024

  37. [45]

    The two-parameter free unitary Segal-Bargmann transform and its Biane-Gross- Malliavin identification.Journal of Functional Analysis, 271(12):3765–3817, 2016

    Ching-Wei Ho. The two-parameter free unitary Segal-Bargmann transform and its Biane-Gross- Malliavin identification.Journal of Functional Analysis, 271(12):3765–3817, 2016

    2016

  38. [46]

    Brown measures of free circular and multiplicative Brownian motions with self-adjoint and unitary initial conditions.arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.08150, 2019

    Ching-Wei Ho and Ping Zhong. Brown measures of free circular and multiplicative Brownian motions with self-adjoint and unitary initial conditions.arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.08150, 2019

    1908 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Tracial smooth functions of non-commuting variables and the free wasserstein manifold.Dissertationes Mathematicae, 580(2):1–150, 2022

    David Jekel, Wuchen Li, and Dimitri Shlyakhtenko. Tracial smooth functions of non-commuting variables and the free wasserstein manifold.Dissertationes Mathematicae, 580(2):1–150, 2022

    2022

  40. [48]

    Non-linear strings in two-dimensional U (∞) gauge theory

    Vladimir A Kazakov and Ivan K Kostov. Non-linear strings in two-dimensional U (∞) gauge theory. Nuclear Physics B, 176(1):199–215, 1980

    1980

  41. [49]

    The large-N limits of Brownian motions onGLN (C)

    Todd Kemp. The large-N limits of Brownian motions onGLN (C). IMRN: International Mathe- matics Research Notices, 2016(13), 2016

    2016

  42. [50]

    Heat kernel empirical laws on UN and GLN

    Todd Kemp. Heat kernel empirical laws on UN and GLN. Journal of Theoretical Probability, 30(2):397–451, 2017

    2017

  43. [51]

    Trace identities and polynomial identities of n × n matrices

    Uri Leron. Trace identities and polynomial identities of n × n matrices. Journal of Algebra, 42(2):369–377, 1976

    1976

  44. [52]

    The master field on the plane.Astérisque, 388, 2017

    Thierry Lévy. The master field on the plane.Astérisque, 388, 2017

    2017

  45. [53]

    Two-dimensional quantum Yang–Mills theory and the Makeenko–Migdal equations

    Thierry Lévy. Two-dimensional quantum Yang–Mills theory and the Makeenko–Migdal equations. In Frontiers in Analysis and Probability: In the Spirit of the Strasbourg-Zürich Meetings, pages 275–325. Springer, 2020

    2020

  46. [54]

    Possible large-N transitions for complex wilson loop matrices.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2008(11):053, 2008

    Robert Lohmayer, Herbert Neuberger, and Tilo Wettig. Possible large-N transitions for complex wilson loop matrices.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2008(11):053, 2008. 42

    2008

  47. [55]

    Strong asymptotic freeness of Haar unitaries in quasi- exponential dimensional representations, 2024

    Michael Magee and Mikael de la Salle. Strong asymptotic freeness of Haar unitaries in quasi- exponential dimensional representations, 2024

    2024

  48. [56]

    The norm of polynomials in large random and deterministic matrices

    Camille Male. The norm of polynomials in large random and deterministic matrices. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 154(3-4):477–532, 2012. With an appendix by Dimitri Shlyakhtenko

    2012

  49. [57]

    American Mathematical Society, 1969

    Henry P McKean.Stochastic integrals, volume 353. American Mathematical Society, 1969

    1969

  50. [58]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006

    Alexandru Nica and Roland Speicher.Lectures on the combinatorics of free probability, volume 335 ofLondon Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006

    2006

  51. [59]

    On the operator norm of non-commutative polynomials in deterministic matrices and iid Haar unitary matrices.Probab

    Félix Parraud. On the operator norm of non-commutative polynomials in deterministic matrices and iid Haar unitary matrices.Probab. Theory Related Fields, 182(3-4):751–806, 2022

    2022

  52. [60]

    On the operator norm of non-commutative polynomials in deterministic matrices and iid haar unitary matrices.Probability Theory and Related Fields, 182(3):751–806, 2022

    Félix Parraud. On the operator norm of non-commutative polynomials in deterministic matrices and iid haar unitary matrices.Probability Theory and Related Fields, 182(3):751–806, 2022

    2022

  53. [61]

    Asymptotic expansion of smooth functions in deterministic and iid haar unitary matrices, and application to tensor products of matrices.arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.02943, 2023

    Félix Parraud. Asymptotic expansion of smooth functions in deterministic and iid haar unitary matrices, and application to tensor products of matrices.arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.02943, 2023

    2023

  54. [62]

    Asymptotic expansion of smooth functions in polynomials in deterministic matrices and iid GUE matrices.Comm

    Félix Parraud. Asymptotic expansion of smooth functions in polynomials in deterministic matrices and iid GUE matrices.Comm. Math. Phys., 399(1):249–294, 2023

    2023

  55. [63]

    The spectrum of a tensor of random and deterministic matrices, 2024

    Félix Parraud. The spectrum of a tensor of random and deterministic matrices, 2024

    2024

  56. [64]

    A simple proof of a theorem of Kirchberg and related results on C∗-norms

    Gilles Pisier. A simple proof of a theorem of Kirchberg and related results on C∗-norms. J. Operator Theory, 35(2):317–335, 1996

    1996

  57. [65]

    Strong convergence for reduced free products.Infin

    Gilles Pisier. Strong convergence for reduced free products.Infin. Dimens. Anal. Quantum Probab. Relat. Top., 19(2):22, 2016. Id/No 1650008

    2016

  58. [66]

    The invariant theory ofn × n matrices

    Claudio Procesi. The invariant theory ofn × n matrices. Advances in Mathematics, 19:306–381, 1976

    1976

  59. [67]

    Combinatorial properties of Brownian motion on the compact classical groups

    Eric M Rains. Combinatorial properties of Brownian motion on the compact classical groups. Journal of Theoretical Probability, 10(3):659–679, 1997

    1997

  60. [68]

    Trace identities of full matrix algebras over a field of characteristic zero.Math- ematics of the USSR-Izvestiya, 8(4):727, 1974

    Yu P Razmyslov. Trace identities of full matrix algebras over a field of characteristic zero.Math- ematics of the USSR-Izvestiya, 8(4):727, 1974

    1974

  61. [69]

    Trace identities and central polynomials in the matrix superalgebras.Mathe- matics of the USSR-Sbornik, 56(1):187, 1987

    Yu P Razmyslov. Trace identities and central polynomials in the matrix superalgebras.Mathe- matics of the USSR-Sbornik, 56(1):187, 1987

    1987

  62. [70]

    Non-commutative polynomials of independent Gaussian random matrices

    Hanne Schultz. Non-commutative polynomials of independent Gaussian random matrices. The real and symplectic cases.Probab. Theory Related Fields, 131(2):261–309, 2005

    2005

  63. [71]

    Traces in two-dimensional qcd: the large-n limit.Traces in number theory, geometry and quantum fields, 38:193–212, 2008

    Ambar N Sengupta. Traces in two-dimensional qcd: the large-n limit.Traces in number theory, geometry and quantum fields, 38:193–212, 2008

    2008

  64. [72]

    On the master field in two dimensions

    Isadore M Singer. On the master field in two dimensions. InFunctional Analysis on the Eve of the 21st Century: Volume I: In Honor of the Eightieth Birthday of IM Gelfand, pages 263–281. Springer, 1995. 43

    1995

  65. [73]

    Limit laws for random matrices and free products.Inventiones mathematicae, 104(1):201–220, 1991

    Dan Voiculescu. Limit laws for random matrices and free products.Inventiones mathematicae, 104(1):201–220, 1991

    1991

  66. [74]

    DV Voiculescu, KJ Dykema, and A Nica. Free random variables: A noncommutative probability approach to free products with applications to random matrices.American Mathematical Society, Operator Algebras and Harmonic Analysis on Free Groups, 1992

    1992

  67. [75]

    On the distribution of the roots of certain symmetric matrices

    Eugene P Wigner. On the distribution of the roots of certain symmetric matrices. Annals of Mathematics, 67(2):325–327, 1958

    1958

  68. [76]

    A random matrix model from two dimensional Yang-Mills theory.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 190:287–307, 1997

    Feng Xu. A random matrix model from two dimensional Yang-Mills theory.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 190:287–307, 1997. Mar w a Banna New York University Abu Dhabi, Division of Science, Mathematics, Abu Dhabi, UAE. E-mail address: marwa.banna@nyu.edu Mireille Capitain...

    1997

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.