Edge Intelligence with Spiking Neural Networks

Albert Y. Zomaya; Changze Lv; Di Yu; Gang Pan; Linshan Jiang; Peng Zhao; Schahram Dustdar; Shuiguang Deng; Weijia Fang; Wentao Tong

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

Edge Intelligence with Spiking Neural Networks

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims to be the first dedicated survey of Edge Intelligence built on spiking neural networks, organizing the field into foundations, practical deployment considerations, and a dual-track evaluation methodology.

desk verdict Solid, useful EdgeSNN survey with an honest taxonomy; the 'first survey' claim is unsupported and should be tempered before publication. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.14069 v1 pith:VZYKWPHW submitted 2025-07-18 cs.DC cs.AIcs.ETcs.NE

Shuiguang Deng , Di Yu , Changze Lv , Xin Du , Linshan Jiang , Xiaofan Zhao , Wentao Tong , Xiaoqing Zheng

show 5 more authors

Weijia Fang Peng Zhao Gang Pan Schahram Dustdar Albert Y. Zomaya

This is my paper

classification cs.DCcs.AIcs.ETcs.NE

keywords EdgeSNNspikingneuralnetworksintelligenceneuromorphiccomputingon-devicelearningmodelcompressionadversarialrobustnessbenchmarking

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to establish the first dedicated survey of Edge Intelligence based on Spiking Neural Networks (EdgeSNNs), the attempt to run brain-inspired, event-driven neural networks on resource-constrained edge devices. If the survey is right, researchers gain a common taxonomy that spans neuron models, learning algorithms, and hardware, plus a shared vocabulary for the three practical problems that matter for deployment: on-device inference, local training under shifting data, and security and privacy. The paper also argues that evaluating EdgeSNNs on ordinary CPUs and GPUs is misleading and proposes a two-track benchmark separating hardware-independent algorithmic metrics from full-system metrics. A sympathetic reader would take this as a field-organizing reference: it names the components, the open gaps, and a route toward fair comparison.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing structure is the survey's three-part taxonomy plus the two-track evaluation scheme. The taxonomy classifies EdgeSNN foundations by neuron model, learning algorithm, and hardware, and then maps practical work onto three concerns: deployment and inference, training and update, and security and privacy. The evaluation machinery is a dual-track scheme: an algorithmic track that measures correctness, footprint, sparsity, and synaptic operations independent of hardware, and a systematic track that measures throughput, latency, energy, and resilience on fully deployed systems. This pairing is what the paper uses to organize the literature and to claim that fair EdgeSNN comparison is possible despite heterogeneous hardware.

What would settle it

Search major indexing services for peer-reviewed surveys or tutorials whose title or abstract combines spiking neural networks with edge computing and that were published before July 2025; locating any dedicated EdgeSNN-specific survey would refute the paper's central first-survey claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that EdgeSNN research has matured enough to be mapped into a systematic taxonomy, and that this is the first survey to do so. It organizes the field into foundations (neuron models such as the Leaky Integrate-and-Fire neuron and its variants; supervised, unsupervised, and hybrid learning algorithms; neuromorphic sensors and chips), practical considerations (lightweight model design and post-hoc simplification for deployment, isolated and collaborative training under non-stationary data, and privacy and security attacks with defenses), and evaluation (an algorithmic track with correctness and complexity metrics, and a systematic track with timing, efficiency, and resilience metrics). It further argues that current benchmarks run on conventional hardware hide SNN advantages, and that the field should adopt a dual-track evaluation to support fair comparison and hardware-aware optimization. The paper presents itself as an essential reference and a roadmap for bridging brain-inspired computing and edge deployment.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the authors' literature search was complete enough to justify calling this the first dedicated EdgeSNN survey; the paper compares itself only to broader neuromorphic-computing surveys and provides no explicit search protocol, so a single earlier such survey would undermine the novelty claim.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Researchers gain a common taxonomy and terminology for EdgeSNNs, which should make individual results easier to compare and reproduce.
If the dual-track evaluation is adopted, an SNN method can be judged first by hardware-independent metrics and then by full-system metrics, separating algorithmic progress from hardware progress.
The survey's security analysis implies that on-device SNN training inherits the privacy risks of collaborative learning plus new spike-specific attack surfaces, so secure EdgeSNN deployment needs dedicated defenses.
The review of learning algorithms suggests near-term EdgeSNN training will rely on rate-coded direct training on GPUs, while temporal coding waits for mature neuromorphic hardware.
The identified software gaps point to concrete next steps: sparse-event-aware profilers, unified intermediate representations, and resource-aware quantization in SNN toolkits.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

An implication the paper leaves implicit: the same three-part taxonomy could be applied to other brain-inspired edge paradigms, since deployment, training, and security concerns are largely paradigm-independent.
The dual-track evaluation could be operationalized as a shared benchmark; a testable prediction is that systematic-track results on neuromorphic hardware will diverge from algorithmic-track estimates, exposing where CPU and GPU simulation misleads.
The paper's security review implies that adversarial robustness, not accuracy, may become the binding constraint for trustworthy EdgeSNN deployment; certifiable robustness for spike-based inputs is a natural next target.
Hybrid ANN-SNN chips that run both spike-based and continuous computation will likely blur the taxonomy's hardware boundary, suggesting the categories will need periodic revision.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The short version: this is a competent, genuinely useful survey of spiking neural networks at the edge. The taxonomy is real work: neuron models, learning algorithms, hardware support, then three practical concerns (deployment/inference, training/update, security/privacy), capped by a proposed dual-track evaluation scheme. Coverage is current through 2025, the tables are well organized, and the accompanying GitHub repo is a nice complement.

What's new is the framing: treating EdgeSNNs as a distinct subfield organized around edge-specific constraints rather than just SNNs that run on small devices. That is a legitimate contribution for a review. The authors also correctly emphasize that most SNN work is validated on GPUs, which ignores the actual constraints of edge deployment.

The soft spot is the first-mover claim. The abstract and Section I both assert this is the first dedicated and comprehensive EdgeSNN survey, but no search protocol, database list, or inclusion criteria are provided. Table I only compares against broader neuromorphic and brain-inspired computing surveys, not against any prior EdgeSNN-specific review. The paper itself hedges in Table I as "one of the first," which sits awkwardly with the stronger abstract wording. A reviewer should ask for a documented search or a softened claim, whichever reflects reality.

The dual-track evaluation framework is sensible but unvalidated. That is acceptable in a survey, but the authors should label it as a proposal rather than a finished contribution.

Overall, this is a well-structured, current, and balanced survey. The issues are fixable and do not undermine its value as a reference. I would bring it to a reading group if anyone works in neuromorphic edge computing, and I would cite it for its taxonomy. It deserves peer review, with the firstness claim and the evaluation framework receiving the most scrutiny.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents a survey of Edge Intelligence based on Spiking Neural Networks (EdgeSNNs). It proposes a taxonomy of foundations—neuron models, network topologies, learning algorithms, and hardware—and reviews three practical considerations: on-device deployment and inference, resource-aware training and updating under non-stationary data, and security and privacy. It also discusses evaluation, proposing a dual-track benchmarking scheme adapted from NeuroBench, and lists open challenges and future directions. The central claim is that this is the first dedicated and comprehensive EdgeSNN survey, accompanied by a GitHub repository listing the surveyed papers.

Significance. If its firstness and comprehensiveness claims hold, the survey provides a valuable reference map for an emerging intersection: it assembles a large and recent corpus, with structured tables covering LIF variants, CNN/GNN/RNN/transformer SNNs, learning algorithms, and programming toolkits, and it gives unusual attention to security and privacy in SNNs and to evaluation methodology. The accompanying GitHub repository is a practical reproducibility asset, and the taxonomy is broadly consistent with the current literature. However, the firstness claim is not substantiated by a disclosed search methodology, and the benchmarking contribution is a proposal rather than a validated framework; these weaken the paper relative to its stated ambitions.

major comments (3)

[Abstract and Section I] The claim that this is 'the first dedicated and comprehensive survey on EdgeSNNs' is load-bearing for the paper's novelty, but the manuscript provides no search protocol, no database list, no inclusion/exclusion criteria, and no evidence that prior EdgeSNN-specific surveys were identified and excluded. Because the contribution list in Section I repeats the firstness claim, the authors should either document a reproducible literature search or revise the claim to one that the evidence supports, such as 'one of the first.'
[Table I] The comparison against existing surveys includes only broader neuromorphic-computing and brain-inspired computing surveys ([12], [39], [40], [11], [41]), none of which is EdgeSNN-specific, so the table cannot by itself support the 'first dedicated survey' claim. Moreover, the 'Ours' row describes the paper as 'one of the first comprehensive discussions on EdgeSNNs,' which is internally inconsistent with the abstract's stronger wording; the authors should resolve this inconsistency and, if the search in the previous comment finds any EdgeSNN-specific survey, add it to the table.
[Section V] The dual-track benchmarking scheme is among the paper's listed contributions, but it is presented only at the level of metric definitions: there are no concrete tasks, no reference workloads, no measurement protocol for energy, and no case study or pilot demonstrating that the two tracks can be operated and that the metrics discriminate among approaches. The authors themselves write in Section V-B that 'as a first step ... we advocate for clear documentation guidelines,' which is consistent with labeling the framework as a research agenda rather than an evaluated contribution; the abstract and introduction should reflect that status.

minor comments (6)

[Section II-B] The sentence 'resulting in a rate-coded value r equal to 1' is wrong for a Bernoulli trial: r∼B(1,x) yields values 0 or 1 with expected value x. Please correct the definition of rate coding.
[Section II-B] TTFS is expanded as 'temporal linear latency encoder' but the standard term is time-to-first-spike; use the standard term or justify the alternative.
[Section V-A] The distinction between dense SOPs and MACs/ACs would be easier to follow with a small worked example, as the current text informally defines them through 'all operations' versus 'non-zero activations and weights.'
[Section V-B] RTO, MTTR, and MTBF are classical reliability metrics; the text should explain how they map to EdgeSNN-specific failure modes, such as spike loss, power faults, or communication failures in neuromorphic systems.
[Table VII] The table is titled 'TOP-10' but no selection criteria are given; please state how the ten entries were chosen and add a caveat that accuracy numbers from different original papers are not directly comparable without uniform training budgets and timesteps.
[Figure 1] There is a typo in the figure header ('Netwoks'); the figure is also very dense and may be hard to read at print size.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the survey synthesizes prior work, and its self-citations are illustrative examples; the unsupported 'first survey' claim is a completeness risk, not a circular step.

full rationale

This is a survey paper, not a derivation chain, and it does not claim to predict or derive results from fitted inputs. The central novelty claim that this is the 'first dedicated and comprehensive survey on EdgeSNNs' is an epistemic assertion about the absence of prior work, not a result derived from the cited literature. It is indeed unsupported by a documented search protocol, and Table I compares only against broader neuromorphic computing surveys, but that is a completeness or correctness risk rather than circularity. The paper even softens the claim to 'one of the first comprehensive discussions' in Table I, which further indicates that the firstness statement is a hedged assertion rather than a construction from the surveyed material. Self-citations [15], [36], and [37] appear as examples of edge-cloud collaboration, edge splitting of SNNs, and federated SNN learning; they are used to illustrate existing work within the taxonomy, not as premises that force the survey's conclusions. The dual-track evaluation in Section V is explicitly adopted from the external NeuroBench framework [38], so no self-citation chain is load-bearing. The taxonomy categorizes prior methods with stated criteria and does not define its categories in terms of its conclusions. No equation, fitted parameter, or benchmark result is reused as a prediction. Hence there is no significant circularity; the score reflects only that several non-load-bearing self-citations appear.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is a survey, so it introduces no free parameters or new entities. Its claims rest on the completeness of its literature coverage and the applicability of an existing benchmarking framework.

assumptions (2)

domain assumption The authors' informal literature review is sufficiently exhaustive to justify the 'first comprehensive survey' claim.
No systematic search methodology is provided in Section I; the claim of firstness relies on an assumed complete scan of the literature.
ad hoc to paper The dual-track evaluation framework from NeuroBench is applicable to EdgeSNNs without fundamental modification.
Section V proposes this framework but does not validate it on EdgeSNN workloads or discuss any adaptations needed for spiking networks.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Edge Intelligence with Spiking Neural Networks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VZYKWPHW

@misc{pith2026250714069,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Edge Intelligence with Spiking Neural Networks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VZYKWPHW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.14069}
}

read the original abstract

The convergence of artificial intelligence and edge computing has spurred growing interest in enabling intelligent services directly on resource-constrained devices. While traditional deep learning models require significant computational resources and centralized data management, the resulting latency, bandwidth consumption, and privacy concerns have exposed critical limitations in cloud-centric paradigms. Brain-inspired computing, particularly Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs), offers a promising alternative by emulating biological neuronal dynamics to achieve low-power, event-driven computation. This survey provides a comprehensive overview of Edge Intelligence based on SNNs (EdgeSNNs), examining their potential to address the challenges of on-device learning, inference, and security in edge scenarios. We present a systematic taxonomy of EdgeSNN foundations, encompassing neuron models, learning algorithms, and supporting hardware platforms. Three representative practical considerations of EdgeSNN are discussed in depth: on-device inference using lightweight SNN models, resource-aware training and updating under non-stationary data conditions, and secure and privacy-preserving issues. Furthermore, we highlight the limitations of evaluating EdgeSNNs on conventional hardware and introduce a dual-track benchmarking strategy to support fair comparisons and hardware-aware optimization. Through this study, we aim to bridge the gap between brain-inspired learning and practical edge deployment, offering insights into current advancements, open challenges, and future research directions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first dedicated and comprehensive survey on EdgeSNNs, providing an essential reference for researchers and practitioners working at the intersection of neuromorphic computing and edge intelligence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.14069 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** The article structure of this survey is organized around four key aspects in the following order: (1) the foundational principles of EdgeSNNs, (2) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Illustration of ANN and SNN neurons. (a) ANN neuron receives signals from the connected pre-neurons, conducts a nonlinear transformation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Visualization of different coding schemes when the number of time steps is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (8 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: A comparison of spiking neuron models w.r.t. implementation cost and biological plausibility (adapted from [60]). [57], and the Izhikevich model [58] are among the most widely adopted. From the perspective of temporal dynamics, neuronal models can be broadly classifie…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Representative neural network topologies widely adopted in modern [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Schematics of SNN learning algorithms. (a) Classic unsupervised [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Comparison of neuromorphic and conventional visual sensors (adapted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Architecture comparison of (a) general processors, (b) ANN accelerators, and (c) neuromorphic chips featuring decentralized many-core architectures [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Illustration of different practical considerations for EdgeSNN applications, including: (a) on-device deployment and inference, (b) training and update [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Two tracks for evaluating EdgeSNNs. The best-performing results from each track can motivate future solutions for the other. In addition, system [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_10.png]

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: Workflow for developing an EdgeSNN system: software serves as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_11.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Online Data Reduction with Spiking Neural Networks: A Temporal-Coincidence Encoder and Distributed SNN for the ePIC dRICH Detector
physics.ins-det 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

A LIF temporal-coincidence encoder plus distributed SNN classifies ePIC dRICH crossings as Signal+Noise vs Noise-Only at TPR>94% and TNR≥80% on simulation, with a 1.7 MHz FPGA sub-sector demo.
AIGOR: A Modular, Event-Driven Neuromorphic Architecture for Configurable SNN Inference
cs.AR 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

AIGOR generates modular, timestep-synchronized FPGA SNN cores from a declarative spec and matches snnTorch accuracy and NEST spike patterns on the same Versal cores across two FPGAs.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[12]

Opportunities for neuromorphic computing algorithms and applications,

C. D. Schuman, S. R. Kulkarni, M. Parsa, J. P. Mitchell, P. Date, and B. Kay, “Opportunities for neuromorphic computing algorithms and applications,”Nature Computational Science, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 10–19, 2022

2022
[39]

Spiking neural networks and their applications: A review,

K. Yamazaki, V .-K. V o-Ho, D. Bulsara, and N. Le, “Spiking neural networks and their applications: A review,”Brain sciences, vol. 12, no. 7, p. 863, 2022

2022
[40]

Exploring neuromorphic computing based on spiking neural networks: Algorithms to hardware,

N. Rathi, I. Chakraborty, A. Kosta, A. Sengupta, A. Ankit, P. Panda, and K. Roy, “Exploring neuromorphic computing based on spiking neural networks: Algorithms to hardware,”ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 1–49, 2023

2023
[11]

Brain-inspired computing: A systematic survey and future trends,

G. Li, L. Deng, H. Tang, G. Pan, Y . Tian, K. Roy, and W. Maass, “Brain-inspired computing: A systematic survey and future trends,” Proceedings of the IEEE, 2024

2024
[41]

Neuromorphic computing at scale,

D. Kudithipudi, C. Schuman, C. M. Vineyard, T. Pandit, C. Merkel, R. Kubendran, J. B. Aimone, G. Orchard, C. Mayr, R. Benosmanet al., “Neuromorphic computing at scale,”Nature, vol. 637, no. 8047, pp. 801–812, 2025

2025
[1]

Large language model based multi-agents: a survey of progress and challenges,

T. Guo, X. Chen, Y . Wang, R. Chang, S. Pei, N. V . Chawla, O. Wiest, and X. Zhang, “Large language model based multi-agents: a survey of progress and challenges,” inProceedings of the Thirty-Third Interna- tional Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2024, pp. 8048–8057

2024
[2]

Object detection in 20 years: A survey,

Z. Zou, K. Chen, Z. Shi, Y . Guo, and J. Ye, “Object detection in 20 years: A survey,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 257– 276, 2023

2023
[3]

Benchmarking news recom- mendation in the era of green ai,

Q. Liu, J. Zhu, Q. Dai, and X.-M. Wu, “Benchmarking news recom- mendation in the era of green ai,” inCompanion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024, 2024, pp. 971–974

2024

Show all 300 references

[4]

Foundation models for time series analysis: A tutorial and survey,

Y . Liang, H. Wen, Y . Nie, Y . Jiang, M. Jin, D. Song, S. Pan, and Q. Wen, “Foundation models for time series analysis: A tutorial and survey,” inProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 2024, pp. 6555–6565

2024
[5]

Edge computing with artificial intelligence: A machine learning perspective,

H. Hua, Y . Li, T. Wang, N. Dong, W. Li, and J. Cao, “Edge computing with artificial intelligence: A machine learning perspective,”ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 1–35, 2023

2023
[6]

Deep learning for iot big data and streaming analytics: A survey,

M. Mohammadi, A. Al-Fuqaha, S. Sorour, and M. Guizani, “Deep learning for iot big data and streaming analytics: A survey,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 2923–2960, 2018

2018
[7]

The eu general data protection regulation (gdpr),

P. V oigt and A. V on dem Bussche, “The eu general data protection regulation (gdpr),”A practical guide, 1st ed., Cham: Springer Interna- tional Publishing, vol. 10, no. 3152676, pp. 10–5555, 2017

2017
[8]

Edge intelligence: The confluence of edge computing and artificial intelligence,

S. Deng, H. Zhao, W. Fang, J. Yin, S. Dustdar, and A. Y . Zomaya, “Edge intelligence: The confluence of edge computing and artificial intelligence,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 7457– 7469, 2020

2020
[9]

Edge intelligence: Empowering intelligence to the edge of network,

D. Xu, T. Li, Y . Li, X. Su, S. Tarkoma, T. Jiang, J. Crowcroft, and P. Hui, “Edge intelligence: Empowering intelligence to the edge of network,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 109, no. 11, pp. 1778–1837, 2021

2021
[10]

Bottom-up and top-down ap- proaches for the design of neuromorphic processing systems: Tradeoffs and synergies between natural and artificial intelligence,

C. Frenkel, D. Bol, and G. Indiveri, “Bottom-up and top-down ap- proaches for the design of neuromorphic processing systems: Tradeoffs and synergies between natural and artificial intelligence,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 111, no. 6, pp. 623–652, 2023

2023
[13]

Networks of spiking neurons: the third generation of neural network models,

W. Maass, “Networks of spiking neurons: the third generation of neural network models,”Neural networks, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1659–1671, 1997

1997
[14]

Spike-based dynamic computing with asynchronous sensing-computing neuromorphic chip,

M. Yao, O. Richter, G. Zhao, N. Qiao, Y . Xing, D. Wang, T. Hu, W. Fang, T. Demirci, M. De Marchiet al., “Spike-based dynamic computing with asynchronous sensing-computing neuromorphic chip,” Nature Communications, vol. 15, p. 4464, 2024

2024
[15]

Ecc-snn: Cost-effective edge-cloud collaboration for spiking neural networks,

D. Yu, C. Lv, X. Du, L. Jiang, W. Tong, Z. Liao, X. Zheng, and S. Deng, “Ecc-snn: Cost-effective edge-cloud collaboration for spiking neural networks,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.20835, 2025

2025 arXiv
[16]

Gerstner, W

W. Gerstner, W. M. Kistler, R. Naud, and L. Paninski,Neuronal dynamics: From single neurons to networks and models of cognition. Cambridge University Press, 2014

2014
[17]

Stdp-based pruning of connections and weight quantization in spiking neural networks for energy-efficient recognition,

N. Rathi, P. Panda, and K. Roy, “Stdp-based pruning of connections and weight quantization in spiking neural networks for energy-efficient recognition,”IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Inte- grated Circuits and Systems, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 668–677, 2018

2018
[18]

Bridging the gap between ANNs and SNNs by calibrating offset spikes,

Z. Hao, J. Ding, T. Bu, T. Huang, and Z. Yu, “Bridging the gap between ANNs and SNNs by calibrating offset spikes,” inThe Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023

2023
[19]

Direct training for spiking neural networks: Faster, larger, better,

Y . Wu, L. Deng, G. Li, J. Zhu, Y . Xie, and L. Shi, “Direct training for spiking neural networks: Faster, larger, better,” inProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol. 33, 2019, pp. 1311– 1318

2019
[20]

Lite-snn: design- ing lightweight and efficient spiking neural network through spatial- temporal compressive network search and joint optimization,

Q. Liu, J. Yan, M. Zhang, G. Pan, and H. Li, “Lite-snn: design- ing lightweight and efficient spiking neural network through spatial- temporal compressive network search and joint optimization,” inPro- ceedings of the Thirty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial I...

2024
[21]

Autosnn: Towards energy-efficient spiking neural networks,

B. Na, J. Mok, S. Park, D. Lee, H. Choe, and S. Yoon, “Autosnn: Towards energy-efficient spiking neural networks,” inInternational conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2022, pp. 16 253–16 269

2022
[22]

Towards efficient deep spiking neural networks construction with spiking activity based pruning,

Y . Li, Q. Xu, J. Shen, H. Xu, L. Chen, and G. Pan, “Towards efficient deep spiking neural networks construction with spiking activity based pruning,” inInternational Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2024, pp. 29 063–29 073

2024
[23]

Qp-snn: Quantized and pruned spiking neural networks,

W. Wei, M. Zhang, Z. Zhou, A. Belatreche, Y . Shan, Y . Liang, H. Cao, J. Zhang, and Y . Yang, “Qp-snn: Quantized and pruned spiking neural networks,” inThe Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2025

2025
[24]

Quantized spike-driven transformer,

X. Qiu, M. Zhang, J. Zhang, W. Wei, H. Cao, J. Guo, R.-J. Zhu, Y . Shan, Y . Yang, and H. Li, “Quantized spike-driven transformer,” in The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2025

2025
[25]

Alade-snn: Adaptive logit alignment in dynamically expandable spiking neural networks for class incremental learning,

W. Ni, J. Shen, Q. Xu, and H. Tang, “Alade-snn: Adaptive logit alignment in dynamically expandable spiking neural networks for class incremental learning,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 39, no. 18, 2025, pp. 19 712–19 720. JOURNAL OF LAT...

2025
[26]

Enhancing training of spiking neural network with stochastic latency,

S. Anumasa, B. Mukhoty, V . Bojkovic, G. De Masi, H. Xiong, and B. Gu, “Enhancing training of spiking neural network with stochastic latency,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelli- gence, vol. 38. Palo Alto, CA, USA: AAAI Press, 2024, pp. 10 900– 10 908

2024
[27]

Asteroid: Resource- efficient hybrid pipeline parallelism for collaborative dnn training on heterogeneous edge devices,

S. Ye, L. Zeng, X. Chu, G. Xing, and X. Chen, “Asteroid: Resource- efficient hybrid pipeline parallelism for collaborative dnn training on heterogeneous edge devices,” inProceedings of the 30th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, 2024, pp. 312–326

2024
[28]

Federated learning with spiking neural networks,

Y . Venkatesha, Y . Kim, L. Tassiulas, and P. Panda, “Federated learning with spiking neural networks,”IEEE Transactions on Signal Process- ing, vol. 69, pp. 6183–6194, 2021

2021
[29]

Privatesnn: privacy-preserving spiking neural networks,

Y . Kim, Y . Venkatesha, and P. Panda, “Privatesnn: privacy-preserving spiking neural networks,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 36, 2022, pp. 1192–1200

2022
[30]

Dif- ferentially private spiking variational autoencoder,

S. Yadav, A. Pundhir, T. Goyal, B. Raman, and S. Kumar, “Dif- ferentially private spiking variational autoencoder,” inInternational Conference on Pattern Recognition. Springer, 2025, pp. 96–112

2025
[31]

Recent advances in scalable energy-efficient and trustworthy spiking neural networks: from algorithms to technology,

S. Kundu, R.-J. Zhu, A. Jaiswal, and P. A. Beerel, “Recent advances in scalable energy-efficient and trustworthy spiking neural networks: from algorithms to technology,” inICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE,...

2024
[32]

Rate gradient approximation attack threats deep spiking neural networks,

T. Bu, J. Ding, Z. Hao, and Z. Yu, “Rate gradient approximation attack threats deep spiking neural networks,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 7896–7906

2023
[33]

Snn-rat: Robustness- enhanced spiking neural network through regularized adversarial train- ing,

J. Ding, T. Bu, Z. Yu, T. Huang, and J. Liu, “Snn-rat: Robustness- enhanced spiking neural network through regularized adversarial train- ing,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 24 780–24 793, 2022

2022
[34]

Toward robust spiking neural network against adversarial perturbation,

L. Liang, K. Xu, X. Hu, L. Deng, and Y . Xie, “Toward robust spiking neural network against adversarial perturbation,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 10 244–10 256, 2022

2022
[35]

Exploring vulnerabilities in spiking neural networks: Direct adversarial attacks on raw event data,

Y . Yao, X. Zhao, and B. Gu, “Exploring vulnerabilities in spiking neural networks: Direct adversarial attacks on raw event data,” inEuropean Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 2024, pp. 412–428

2024
[36]

Ec-snn: Splitting deep spiking neural networks for edge devices,

D. Yu, X. Du, L. Jiang, W. Tong, and S. Deng, “Ec-snn: Splitting deep spiking neural networks for edge devices,” inProceedings of the Thirty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-24, K. Larson, Ed. International Joint Conferences on Artificial ...

2024
[37]

Exploiting label skewness for spiking neural networks in federated learning,

D. Yu, X. Du, L. Jiang, H. Zhang, S. Bai, and S. Deng, “Exploiting label skewness for spiking neural networks in federated learning,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.17305, 2024

2024 arXiv
[38]

The neurobench framework for benchmarking neuromorphic computing algorithms and systems,

J. Yik, K. Van den Berghe, D. den Blanken, Y . Bouhadjar, M. Fabre, P. Hueber, W. Ke, M. A. Khoei, D. Kleyko, N. Pacik-Nelsonet al., “The neurobench framework for benchmarking neuromorphic computing algorithms and systems,”Nature Communications, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 1545, 2025

2025
[42]

Complex dynamic neurons improved spiking transformer network for efficient automatic speech recognition,

Q. Wang, T. Zhang, M. Han, Y . Wang, D. Zhang, and B. Xu, “Complex dynamic neurons improved spiking transformer network for efficient automatic speech recognition,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 37, 2023, pp. 102–109

2023
[43]

Temporal-wise attention spiking neural networks for event streams classification,

M. Yao, H. Gao, G. Zhao, D. Wang, Y . Lin, Z. Yang, and G. Li, “Temporal-wise attention spiking neural networks for event streams classification,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international confer- ence on computer vision, 2021, pp. 10 221–10 230

2021
[44]

Deep directly-trained spiking neural networks for object detection,

Q. Su, Y . Chou, Y . Hu, J. Li, S. Mei, Z. Zhang, and G. Li, “Deep directly-trained spiking neural networks for object detection,” inPro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2023, pp. 6555–6565

2023
[45]

Autonomous driving with spiking neural networks,

R.-J. Zhu, Z. Wang, L. H. Gilpin, and J. Eshraghian, “Autonomous driving with spiking neural networks,” inThe Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024

2024
[46]

Spiking convolutional neural networks for text classification,

C. Lv, J. Xu, and X. Zheng, “Spiking convolutional neural networks for text classification,” inThe Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023

2023
[47]

Temporal spiking neural networks with synaptic delay for graph reasoning,

M. Xiao, Y . Zhu, D. He, and Z. Lin, “Temporal spiking neural networks with synaptic delay for graph reasoning,” inProceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning, vol. 235. PMLR, 21–27 Jul 2024, pp. 54 341–54 362

2024
[48]

Attention spiking neural networks,

M. Yao, G. Zhao, H. Zhang, Y . Hu, L. Deng, Y . Tian, B. Xu, and G. Li, “Attention spiking neural networks,”IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 2023

2023
[49]

Spikingresformer: bridging resnet and vision transformer in spiking neural networks,

X. Shi, Z. Hao, and Z. Yu, “Spikingresformer: bridging resnet and vision transformer in spiking neural networks,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 5610–5619

2024
[50]

Advancing spiking neural networks for sequential modeling with central pat- tern generators,

C. Lv, D. Han, Y . Wang, X. Zheng, X. Huang, and D. Li, “Advancing spiking neural networks for sequential modeling with central pat- tern generators,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 37, pp. 26 915–26 940, 2024

2024
[51]

Training spiking neural networks using lessons from deep learning,

J. K. Eshraghian, M. Ward, E. O. Neftci, X. Wang, G. Lenz, G. Dwivedi, M. Bennamoun, D. S. Jeong, and W. D. Lu, “Training spiking neural networks using lessons from deep learning,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 111, no. 9, pp. 1016–1054, 2023

2023
[52]

A survey of encoding techniques for signal processing in spiking neural networks,

D. Auge, J. Hille, E. Mueller, and A. Knoll, “A survey of encoding techniques for signal processing in spiking neural networks,”Neural Processing Letters, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 4693–4710, 2021

2021
[53]

Spikingjelly: An open-source machine learning infrastructure platform for spike-based intelligence,

W. Fang, Y . Chen, J. Ding, Z. Yu, T. Masquelier, D. Chen, L. Huang, H. Zhou, G. Li, and Y . Tian, “Spikingjelly: An open-source machine learning infrastructure platform for spike-based intelligence,”Science Advances, vol. 9, no. 40, p. eadi1480, 2023

2023
[54]

What is the other 85 percent of v1 doing,

B. A. Olshausen and D. J. Field, “What is the other 85 percent of v1 doing,”L. van Hemmen, & T. Sejnowski (Eds.), vol. 23, pp. 182–211, 2006

2006
[55]

Learning by the dendritic prediction of somatic spiking,

R. Urbanczik and W. Senn, “Learning by the dendritic prediction of somatic spiking,”Neuron, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 521–528, 2014

2014
[56]

Dendritic cortical microcircuits approximate the backpropagation algorithm,

J. Sacramento, R. Ponte Costa, Y . Bengio, and W. Senn, “Dendritic cortical microcircuits approximate the backpropagation algorithm,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 31, 2018

2018
[57]

A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve,

A. L. Hodgkin and A. F. Huxley, “A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve,”The Journal of physiology, vol. 117, no. 4, p. 500, 1952

1952
[58]

Simple model of spiking neurons,

E. M. Izhikevich, “Simple model of spiking neurons,”IEEE Transac- tions on neural networks, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1569–1572, 2003

2003
[59]

Impact of active dendrites and structural plasticity on the memory capacity of neural tissue,

P. Poirazi and B. W. Mel, “Impact of active dendrites and structural plasticity on the memory capacity of neural tissue,”Neuron, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 779–796, 2001

2001
[60]

Which model to use for cortical spiking neurons?

E. M. Izhikevich, “Which model to use for cortical spiking neurons?” IEEE transactions on neural networks, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1063–1070, 2004

2004
[61]

Gpu computing,

J. D. Owens, M. Houston, D. Luebke, S. Green, J. E. Stone, and J. C. Phillips, “Gpu computing,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 96, no. 5, pp. 879–899, 2008

2008
[62]

Learning delays in spiking neural networks using dilated convolutions with learnable spacings,

I. Hammouamri, I. Khalfaoui-Hassani, and T. Masquelier, “Learning delays in spiking neural networks using dilated convolutions with learnable spacings,” inICLR, 2024

2024
[63]

Glif: A unified gated leaky integrate-and-fire neuron for spiking neural networks,

X. Yao, F. Li, Z. Mo, and J. Cheng, “Glif: A unified gated leaky integrate-and-fire neuron for spiking neural networks,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 32 160–32 171, 2022

2022
[64]

P-spikessm: Harnessing probabilistic spiking state space models for long-range dependency tasks,

M. Bal and A. Sengupta, “P-spikessm: Harnessing probabilistic spiking state space models for long-range dependency tasks,” inThe Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2025

2025
[65]

Deep spiking neural network with neural oscillation and spike-phase information,

Y . Chen, H. Qu, M. Zhang, and Y . Wang, “Deep spiking neural network with neural oscillation and spike-phase information,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 35, 2021, pp. 7073–7080

2021
[66]

Ternary spike: Learning ternary spikes for spiking neural networks,

Y . Guo, Y . Chen, X. Liu, W. Peng, Y . Zhang, X. Huang, and Z. Ma, “Ternary spike: Learning ternary spikes for spiking neural networks,” in Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol. 38, 2024, pp. 12 244–12 252

2024
[67]

Vistream: Improving computation efficiency of visual streaming per- ception via law-of-charge-conservation inspired spiking neural net- work,

K. You, Z. Wei, J. Yan, B. Zhang, Q. Guo, Y . Zhang, and Z. He, “Vistream: Improving computation efficiency of visual streaming per- ception via law-of-charge-conservation inspired spiking neural net- work,” inProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conferen...

2025
[68]

Addressing the speed-accuracy simulation trade-off for adaptive spiking neurons,

L. Taylor, A. King, and N. S. Harper, “Addressing the speed-accuracy simulation trade-off for adaptive spiking neurons,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 36, pp. 59 360–59 374, 2023. JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 14, NO. 8, AUGUST 2021 23

2023
[69]

High-performance temporal reversible spiking neural networks withO(l) training memory andO(1) inference cost,

J. Hu, M. Yao, X. Qiu, Y . Chou, Y . Cai, N. Qiao, Y . Tian, X. Bo, and G. Li, “High-performance temporal reversible spiking neural networks withO(l) training memory andO(1) inference cost,” inForty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, 2024

2024
[70]

Prf: Parallel resonate and fire neuron for long sequence learning in spiking neural networks,

Y . Huang, Z. Liu, C. Feng, X. Lin, H. Ren, H. Fu, Y . Zhou, H. Xing, and B. Cheng, “Prf: Parallel resonate and fire neuron for long sequence learning in spiking neural networks,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.03530, 2024

2024 arXiv
[71]

Parallel spiking neurons with high efficiency and ability to learn long-term dependencies,

W. Fang, Z. Yu, Z. Zhou, D. Chen, Y . Chen, Z. Ma, T. Masquelier, and Y . Tian, “Parallel spiking neurons with high efficiency and ability to learn long-term dependencies,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 36, pp. 53 674–53 687, 2023

2023
[72]

A vision chip with complementary pathways for open-world sensing,

Z. Yang, T. Wang, Y . Lin, Y . Chen, H. Zeng, J. Pei, J. Wang, X. Liu, Y . Zhou, J. Zhanget al., “A vision chip with complementary pathways for open-world sensing,”Nature, vol. 629, no. 8014, pp. 1027–1033, 2024

2024
[73]

Spike2former: Efficient spiking transformer for high-performance image segmenta- tion,

Z. Lei, M. Yao, J. Hu, X. Luo, Y . Lu, B. Xu, and G. Li, “Spike2former: Efficient spiking transformer for high-performance image segmenta- tion,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 39, 2025, pp. 1364–1372

2025
[74]

Incorporating learnable membrane time constant to enhance learning of spiking neural networks,

W. Fang, Z. Yu, Y . Chen, T. Masquelier, T. Huang, and Y . Tian, “Incorporating learnable membrane time constant to enhance learning of spiking neural networks,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF interna- tional conference on computer vision, 2021, pp. 2661–2671

2021
[75]

Reducing information loss for spiking neural networks,

Y . Guo, Y . Chen, L. Zhang, Y . Wang, X. Liu, X. Tong, Y . Ou, X. Huang, and Z. Ma, “Reducing information loss for spiking neural networks,” inEuropean Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 2022, pp. 36–52

2022
[76]

Ltmd: learning improvement of spiking neural networks with learnable thresholding neurons and moderate dropout,

S. Wang, T. H. Cheng, and M.-H. Lim, “Ltmd: learning improvement of spiking neural networks with learnable thresholding neurons and moderate dropout,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Sys- tems, vol. 35, pp. 28 350–28 362, 2022

2022
[77]

Biologically inspired dynamic thresholds for spiking neural networks,

J. Ding, B. Dong, F. Heide, Y . Ding, Y . Zhou, B. Yin, and X. Yang, “Biologically inspired dynamic thresholds for spiking neural networks,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 35, pp. 6090– 6103, 2022

2022
[78]

Temporal-coded spiking neural networks with dynamic firing thresh- old: Learning with event-driven backpropagation,

W. Wei, M. Zhang, H. Qu, A. Belatreche, J. Zhang, and H. Chen, “Temporal-coded spiking neural networks with dynamic firing thresh- old: Learning with event-driven backpropagation,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2023, pp. 10 552–10 562

2023
[79]

Clif: Complementary leaky integrate-and-fire neuron for spiking neural networks,

Y . Huang, X. Lin, H. Ren, H. Fu, Y . Zhou, Z. Liu, B. Pan, and B. Cheng, “Clif: Complementary leaky integrate-and-fire neuron for spiking neural networks,” inInternational Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2024, pp. 19 949–19 972

2024
[80]

Asynchronous bioplausible neuron for spiking neural networks for event-based vision,

S. Kachole, H. Sajwani, F. B. Naeini, D. Makris, and Y . Zweiri, “Asynchronous bioplausible neuron for spiking neural networks for event-based vision,” inEuropean Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 2024, pp. 399–415

2024
[81]

Da-lif: Dual adaptive leaky integrate-and-fire model for deep spiking neural networks,

T. Zhang, K. Yu, J. Zhang, and H. Wang, “Da-lif: Dual adaptive leaky integrate-and-fire model for deep spiking neural networks,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.10422, 2025

2025 arXiv
[82]

Rethinking spiking neu- ral networks from an ensemble learning perspective,

Y . Ding, L. Zuo, M. Jing, P. He, and H. Deng, “Rethinking spiking neu- ral networks from an ensemble learning perspective,” inThe Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2025

2025
[83]

Tc-lif: A two-compartment spiking neuron model for long-term sequential mod- elling,

S. Zhang, Q. Yang, C. Ma, J. Wu, H. Li, and K. C. Tan, “Tc-lif: A two-compartment spiking neuron model for long-term sequential mod- elling,” inProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol. 38, 2024, pp. 16 838–16 847

2024
[84]

Spiking-leaf: A learnable auditory front-end for spiking neural networks,

Z. Song, J. Wu, M. Zhang, M. Z. Shou, and H. Li, “Spiking-leaf: A learnable auditory front-end for spiking neural networks,” inICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2024, pp. 226–230

2024
[85]

A progres- sive training framework for spiking neural networks with learnable multi-hierarchical model,

Z. Hao, X. Shi, Z. Huang, T. Bu, Z. Yu, and T. Huang, “A progres- sive training framework for spiking neural networks with learnable multi-hierarchical model,” inThe Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024

2024
[86]

Autaptic synaptic circuit enhances spatio-temporal predictive learning of spiking neural networks,

L. Wang and Z. Yu, “Autaptic synaptic circuit enhances spatio-temporal predictive learning of spiking neural networks,” inInternational Con- ference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2024, pp. 52 083–52 098

2024
[87]

Temporal dendritic heterogeneity incorporated with spiking neural networks for learning multi-timescale dynamics,

H. Zheng, Z. Zheng, R. Hu, B. Xiao, Y . Wu, F. Yu, X. Liu, G. Li, and L. Deng, “Temporal dendritic heterogeneity incorporated with spiking neural networks for learning multi-timescale dynamics,”Nature Communications, vol. 15, p. 277, 2024

2024
[88]

TS-LIF: A tem- poral segment spiking neuron network for time series forecasting,

F. SHIBO, W. Feng, X. Gao, P. Zhao, and Z. Shen, “TS-LIF: A tem- poral segment spiking neuron network for time series forecasting,” in The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2025

2025
[89]

Enhancing robustness of spiking neural networks through retina-like coding and memory-based neurons,

J. Zhang, K. Wang, M. Yao, H. Xu, P. Zhou, B. Xu, and G. Li, “Enhancing robustness of spiking neural networks through retina-like coding and memory-based neurons,”Authorea Preprints, 2025

2025
[90]

Klif: An optimized spiking neuron unit for tuning surrogate gradient slope and membrane potential,

C. Jiang and Y . Zhang, “Klif: An optimized spiking neuron unit for tuning surrogate gradient slope and membrane potential,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.09238, 2023

2023 arXiv
[91]

Deep learning,

Y . LeCun, Y . Bengio, and G. Hinton, “Deep learning,”nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436–444, 2015

2015
[92]

Deep residual learning in spiking neural networks,

W. Fang, Z. Yu, Y . Chen, T. Huang, T. Masquelier, and Y . Tian, “Deep residual learning in spiking neural networks,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 34, pp. 21 056–21 069, 2021

2021
[93]

Spiking pointnet: Spiking neural networks for point clouds,

D. Ren, Z. Ma, Y . Chen, W. Peng, X. Liu, Y . Zhang, and Y . Guo, “Spiking pointnet: Spiking neural networks for point clouds,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 36, pp. 41 797–41 808, 2023

2023
[94]

Gated attention coding for training high-performance and efficient spiking neural networks,

X. Qiu, R.-J. Zhu, Y . Chou, Z. Wang, L.-j. Deng, and G. Li, “Gated attention coding for training high-performance and efficient spiking neural networks,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 38, 2024, pp. 601–610

2024
[95]

Advancing spiking neural networks toward deep residual learning,

Y . Hu, L. Deng, Y . Wu, M. Yao, and G. Li, “Advancing spiking neural networks toward deep residual learning,”IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, vol. 36, pp. 2353–2367, 2024

2024
[96]

Sfod: Spiking fusion object detector,

Y . Fan, W. Zhang, C. Liu, M. Li, and W. Lu, “Sfod: Spiking fusion object detector,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 17 191–17 200

2024
[97]

Integer-valued training and spike-driven inference spiking neural network for high- performance and energy-efficient object detection,

X. Luo, M. Yao, Y . Chou, B. Xu, and G. Li, “Integer-valued training and spike-driven inference spiking neural network for high- performance and energy-efficient object detection,” inEuropean Con- ference on Computer Vision. Springer, 2024, pp. 253–272

2024
[98]

Brain-inspired spiking neural networks for energy-efficient object detection,

Z. Li, T. Gao, Y . An, T. Chen, J. Zhang, Y . Wen, M. Liu, and Q. Zhang, “Brain-inspired spiking neural networks for energy-efficient object detection,” inProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, 2025, pp. 3552–3562

2025
[99]

A spiking neural network for image segmentation,

K. Patel, E. Hunsberger, S. Batir, and C. Eliasmith, “A spiking neural network for image segmentation,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.08921, 2021

2021 arXiv
[100]

Segmentation and edge detection based on spiking neural network model,

B. Meftah, O. Lezoray, and A. Benyettou, “Segmentation and edge detection based on spiking neural network model,”Neural Processing Letters, vol. 32, pp. 131–146, 2010

2010
[101]

Accurate and efficient event-based semantic segmentation using adaptive spiking encoder–decoder network,

R. Zhang, L. Leng, K. Che, H. Zhang, J. Cheng, Q. Guo, J. Liao, and R. Cheng, “Accurate and efficient event-based semantic segmentation using adaptive spiking encoder–decoder network,”IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2024

2024
[102]

Convolutional spiking neural networks for intent detection based on anticipatory brain potentials using electroencephalogram,

N. Lutes, V . S. S. Nadendla, and K. Krishnamurthy, “Convolutional spiking neural networks for intent detection based on anticipatory brain potentials using electroencephalogram,”Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 8850, 2024

2024
[103]

Event-based action recognition using motion information and spiking neural networks

Q. Liu, D. Xing, H. Tang, D. Ma, and G. Pan, “Event-based action recognition using motion information and spiking neural networks.” in IJCAI, 2021, pp. 1743–1749

2021
[104]

Spiking neural network based on joint entropy of optical flow features for human action recognition,

S. J. Berlin and M. John, “Spiking neural network based on joint entropy of optical flow features for human action recognition,”The visual computer, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 223–237, 2022

2022
[105]

Intelligent sensing-to-action for robust autonomy at the edge: Opportunities and challenges,

A. R. Trivedi, S. Tayebati, H. Kumawat, N. Darabi, D. Kumar, A. K. Kosta, Y . Venkatesha, D. Jayasuriya, N. Jayasinghe, P. Panda et al., “Intelligent sensing-to-action for robust autonomy at the edge: Opportunities and challenges,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.02692, 2025

2025 arXiv
[106]

Temporal-coded deep spiking neural network with easy training and robust performance,

S. Zhou, X. Li, Y . Chen, S. T. Chandrasekaran, and A. Sanyal, “Temporal-coded deep spiking neural network with easy training and robust performance,” inProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol. 35, 2021, pp. 11 143–11 151

2021
[107]

Energy-efficient models for high-dimensional spike train classification using sparse spiking neural networks,

H. Yin, J. B. Lee, X. Kong, T. Hartvigsen, and S. Xie, “Energy-efficient models for high-dimensional spike train classification using sparse spiking neural networks,” inProceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery & data mining, 2021, pp. 2017– 2025

2021
[108]

Point-to-spike residual learning for energy-efficient 3d point cloud classification,

Q. Wu, Q. Zhang, C. Tan, Y . Zhou, and C. Sun, “Point-to-spike residual learning for energy-efficient 3d point cloud classification,” in Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol. 38, 2024, pp. 6092–6099

2024
[109]

Learning a spiking neural network for efficient image deraining,

T. Song, G. Jin, P. Li, K. Jiang, X. Chen, and J. Jin, “Learning a spiking neural network for efficient image deraining,” inProceedings of the Thirty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2024, pp. 1254–1262. JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 14, NO...

2024
[110]

Efficient and effective time-series forecasting with spiking neural networks,

C. Lv, Y . Wang, D. Han, X. Zheng, X. Huang, and D. Li, “Efficient and effective time-series forecasting with spiking neural networks,” in International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2024, pp. 33 624–33 637

2024
[111]

Autonomous driving with spiking neural networks,

R.-J. Zhu, Z. Wang, L. Gilpin, and J. Eshraghian, “Autonomous driving with spiking neural networks,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 37, pp. 136 782–136 804, 2025

2025
[112]

Spik- ingyolox: Improved yolox object detection with fast fourier convolution and spiking neural networks,

W. Miao, J. Shen, Q. Xu, T. Hamalainen, Y . Xu, and F. Cong, “Spik- ingyolox: Improved yolox object detection with fast fourier convolution and spiking neural networks,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 39, 2025, pp. 1465–1473

2025
[113]

Efficient 3d recognition with event-driven spike sparse convolution,

X. Qiu, M. Yao, J. Zhang, Y . Chou, N. Qiao, S. Zhou, B. Xu, and G. Li, “Efficient 3d recognition with event-driven spike sparse convolution,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 39, 2025, pp. 20 086–20 094

2025
[114]

Crest: An efficient conjointly- trained spike-driven framework for event-based object detection ex- ploiting spatiotemporal dynamics,

R. Mao, A. Shen, L. Tang, and J. Zhou, “Crest: An efficient conjointly- trained spike-driven framework for event-based object detection ex- ploiting spatiotemporal dynamics,” inProceedings of the AAAI Con- ference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 39, 2025, pp. 6072–6080

2025
[115]

Ucf-crime-dvs: A novel event-based dataset for video anomaly detection with spiking neural networks,

Y . Qian, S. Ye, C. Wang, X. Cai, J. Qian, and J. Wu, “Ucf-crime-dvs: A novel event-based dataset for video anomaly detection with spiking neural networks,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 39, 2025, pp. 6577–6585

2025
[116]

Graph neural networks: foundation, frontiers and applications,

L. Wu, P. Cui, J. Pei, L. Zhao, and X. Guo, “Graph neural networks: foundation, frontiers and applications,” inProceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 2022, pp. 4840–4841

2022
[117]

A survey on graph neural networks for time series: Forecasting, classification, imputation, and anomaly detection,

M. Jin, H. Y . Koh, Q. Wen, D. Zambon, C. Alippi, G. I. Webb, I. King, and S. Pan, “A survey on graph neural networks for time series: Forecasting, classification, imputation, and anomaly detection,”IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2024

2024
[118]

A graph is worth 1-bit spikes: When graph contrastive learning meets spiking neural networks,

J. Li, H. Zhang, R. Wu, Z. Zhu, B. Wang, C. Meng, Z. Zheng, and L. Chen, “A graph is worth 1-bit spikes: When graph contrastive learning meets spiking neural networks,” inICLR, 2024

2024
[119]

Transductive spiking graph neural networks for loihi,

S. Snyder, V . Clerico, G. Cong, S. Kulkarni, C. Schuman, S. Risbud, and M. Parsa, “Transductive spiking graph neural networks for loihi,” inProceedings of the Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI 2024, 2024, pp. 608–613

2024
[120]

Signn: A spike- induced graph neural network for dynamic graph representation learn- ing,

D. Chen, S. Zheng, M. Xu, Z. Zhu, and Y . Zhao, “Signn: A spike- induced graph neural network for dynamic graph representation learn- ing,”Pattern Recognition, vol. 158, p. 111026, 2025

2025
[121]

Exploiting spiking dynamics with spatial-temporal feature normalization in graph learn- ing,

M. Xu, Y . Wu, L. Deng, F. Liu, G. Li, and J. Pei, “Exploiting spiking dynamics with spatial-temporal feature normalization in graph learn- ing,” inProceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-21, 2021, pp. 3207–3213

2021
[122]

Temporal spiking neural networks with synaptic delay for graph reasoning,

M. Xiao, Y . Zhu, D. He, and Z. Lin, “Temporal spiking neural networks with synaptic delay for graph reasoning,” inInternational Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2024, pp. 54 341–54 362

2024
[123]

Spiking graph neural network on riemannian manifolds,

L. Sun, Z. Huang, Q. Wan, H. Peng, and S. Y . Philip, “Spiking graph neural network on riemannian manifolds,” inThe Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024

2024
[124]

Spiking graph convolutional networks,

Z. Zhu, J. Peng, J. Li, L. Chen, Q. Yu, and S. Luo, “Spiking graph convolutional networks,” inProceedings of the Thirty-First Interna- tional Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-22, 2022, pp. 2434–2440

2022
[125]

Scaling up dynamic graph representation learning via spiking neural networks,

J. Li, Z. Yu, Z. Zhu, L. Chen, Q. Yu, Z. Zheng, S. Tian, R. Wu, and C. Meng, “Scaling up dynamic graph representation learning via spiking neural networks,” inProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol. 37, 2023, pp. 8588–8596

2023
[126]

Dynamic reactive spiking graph neural network,

H. Zhao, X. Yang, C. Deng, and J. Yan, “Dynamic reactive spiking graph neural network,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 38, 2024, pp. 16 970–16 978

2024
[127]

Dynamic spiking graph neural networks,

N. Yin, M. Wang, Z. Chen, G. De Masi, H. Xiong, and B. Gu, “Dynamic spiking graph neural networks,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 38, 2024, pp. 16 495–16 503

2024
[128]

Vt-sgn: Spiking graph neural network for neuromorphic visual-tactile fusion,

P. Wu, H. Zhang, Y . Li, W. Chen, and G. Gao, “Vt-sgn: Spiking graph neural network for neuromorphic visual-tactile fusion,”IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 2024

2024
[129]

Leveraging asynchronous spiking neural networks for ultra efficient event-based visual processing,

D. Zeng, Y . Wang, H. Cao, W. Liu, Y . Xiao, W. Chen, M. Zhang, G. Wang, Y . Yanget al., “Leveraging asynchronous spiking neural networks for ultra efficient event-based visual processing,” inProceed- ings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 39, 2025, pp. 1620–1628

2025
[130]

Noise-injected spiking graph convolution for energy-efficient 3d point cloud denoising,

Z. Li, Q. Wu, J. Zhang, K. Zhang, and J. Wang, “Noise-injected spiking graph convolution for energy-efficient 3d point cloud denoising,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 39, 2025, pp. 18 629–18 637

2025
[131]

Learning to walk: Spike based reinforcement learning for hexapod robot central pattern generation,

A. S. Lele, Y . Fang, J. Ting, and A. Raychowdhury, “Learning to walk: Spike based reinforcement learning for hexapod robot central pattern generation,” in2020 2nd IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Circuits and Systems (AICAS). IEEE, 2020, pp. 208–212

2020
[132]

Evolving connectivity for recurrent spiking neural networks,

G. Wang, Y . Sun, S. Cheng, and S. Song, “Evolving connectivity for recurrent spiking neural networks,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 36, pp. 2991–3007, 2023

2023
[133]

Recurrent spiking networks solve planning tasks,

E. Rueckert, D. Kappel, D. Tanneberg, D. Pecevski, and J. Peters, “Recurrent spiking networks solve planning tasks,”Scientific reports, vol. 6, p. 21142, 2016

2016
[134]

Stabilizing sequence learning in stochastic spiking networks with gaba-modulated stdp,

M. Vieth and J. Triesch, “Stabilizing sequence learning in stochastic spiking networks with gaba-modulated stdp,”Neural Networks, vol. 183, p. 106985, 2025

2025
[135]

Rsnn: Recurrent spiking neural networks for dynamic spatial-temporal in- formation processing,

Q. Xu, X. Fang, Y . Li, J. Shen, D. Ma, Y . Xu, and G. Pan, “Rsnn: Recurrent spiking neural networks for dynamic spatial-temporal in- formation processing,” inProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2024, pp. 10 602–10 610

2024
[136]

Spike-train level backpropagation for training deep recurrent spiking neural networks,

W. Zhang and P. Li, “Spike-train level backpropagation for training deep recurrent spiking neural networks,”Advances in neural informa- tion processing systems, vol. 32, 2019

2019
[137]

Adjusted spikeprop algorithm for recurrent spiking neural networks with lif neurons,

K. Laddach and R. Łangowski, “Adjusted spikeprop algorithm for recurrent spiking neural networks with lif neurons,”Applied Soft Computing, vol. 165, p. 112120, 2024

2024
[138]

A 71.2-µw speech recognition accel- erator with recurrent spiking neural network,

C.-C. Yang and T.-S. Chang, “A 71.2-µw speech recognition accel- erator with recurrent spiking neural network,”IEEE transactions on circuits and systems I: Regular Papers, 2024

2024
[139]

Frame-unit operating neuron circuits for hardware recurrent spiking neural networks,

Y . Kim, B. Jeon, J. Park, and W. Y . Choi, “Frame-unit operating neuron circuits for hardware recurrent spiking neural networks,”IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 2025

2025
[140]

Spiking neural networks with improved inherent recurrence dynamics for sequential learning,

W. Ponghiran and K. Roy, “Spiking neural networks with improved inherent recurrence dynamics for sequential learning,” inProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol. 36, 2022, pp. 8001–8008

2022
[141]

Enhancing adaptive history reserving by spiking convolutional block attention module in recurrent neural networks,

Q. Xu, Y . Gao, J. Shen, Y . Li, X. Ran, H. Tang, and G. Pan, “Enhancing adaptive history reserving by spiking convolutional block attention module in recurrent neural networks,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 36, pp. 58 890–58 901, 2023

2023
[142]

Eas-snn: End-to-end adaptive sampling and representation for event- based detection with recurrent spiking neural networks,

Z. Wang, Z. Wang, H. Li, L. Qin, R. Jiang, D. Ma, and H. Tang, “Eas-snn: End-to-end adaptive sampling and representation for event- based detection with recurrent spiking neural networks,” inEuropean Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 2024, pp. 310–328

2024
[143]

Time series prediction and anomaly detection with recurrent spiking neural networks,

Y . Cherdo, B. Miramond, and A. Pegatoquet, “Time series prediction and anomaly detection with recurrent spiking neural networks,” in2023 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–10

2023
[144]

Grsn: Gated recurrent spiking neurons for pomdps and marl,

L. Qin, Z. Wang, R. Jiang, R. Yan, and H. Tang, “Grsn: Gated recurrent spiking neurons for pomdps and marl,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 39, 2025, pp. 1483–1491

2025
[145]

Transformers in vision: A survey,

S. Khan, M. Naseer, M. Hayat, S. W. Zamir, F. S. Khan, and M. Shah, “Transformers in vision: A survey,”ACM computing surveys (CSUR), vol. 54, no. 10s, pp. 1–41, 2022

2022
[146]

Spike-driven transformer,

M. Yao, J. Hu, Z. Zhou, L. Yuan, Y . Tian, B. Xu, and G. Li, “Spike-driven transformer,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 36, pp. 64 043–64 058, 2023

2023
[147]

Spikformer: When spiking neural network meets transformer,

Z. Zhou, Y . Zhu, C. He, Y . Wang, S. Y AN, Y . Tian, and L. Yuan, “Spikformer: When spiking neural network meets transformer,” inThe Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023

2023
[148]

Spiking transformer: Introducing accurate addition-only spiking self-attention for transformer,

Y . Guo, X. Liu, Y . Chen, W. Peng, Y . Zhang, and Z. Ma, “Spiking transformer: Introducing accurate addition-only spiking self-attention for transformer,” inProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, 2025, pp. 24 398–24 408

2025
[149]

Spiking transformer with spatial-temporal attention,

D. Lee, Y . Li, Y . Kim, S. Xiao, and P. Panda, “Spiking transformer with spatial-temporal attention,” inProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, 2025, pp. 13 948–13 958

2025
[150]

Staa-snn: Spatial-temporal attention aggregator for spiking neural networks,

T. Zhang, K. Yu, X. Zhong, H. Wang, Q. Xu, and Q. Zhang, “Staa-snn: Spatial-temporal attention aggregator for spiking neural networks,” in Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Confer- ence, 2025, pp. 13 959–13 969

2025
[151]

Masked spiking transformer,

Z. Wang, Y . Fang, J. Cao, Q. Zhang, Z. Wang, and R. Xu, “Masked spiking transformer,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2023, pp. 1761–1771

2023
[152]

Rethinking spiking self-attention mechanism: Implement- ingα-xnor similarity calculation in spiking transformers,

Y . Xiao, S. Wang, D. Zhang, W. Wei, Y . Shan, X. Liu, Y . Jiang, and M. Zhang, “Rethinking spiking self-attention mechanism: Implement- ingα-xnor similarity calculation in spiking transformers,” inProceed- ings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, 2025, ...

2025
[153]

Qkformer: Hierarchical spiking transformer using qk attention,

H. Zhang, Z. Zhou, L. Yu, L. Huang, X. Fan, L. Yuan, Z. Ma, H. Zhou, Y . Tianet al., “Qkformer: Hierarchical spiking transformer using qk attention,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 37, pp. 13 074–13 098, 2024

2024
[154]

LMUFormer: Low complex- ity yet powerful spiking model with legendre memory units,

Z. Liu, G. Datta, A. Li, and P. A. Beerel, “LMUFormer: Low complex- ity yet powerful spiking model with legendre memory units,” inThe Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024

2024
[155]

Spiking token mixer: An event- driven friendly former structure for spiking neural networks,

S. Deng, Y . Wu, K. Du, and S. Gu, “Spiking token mixer: An event- driven friendly former structure for spiking neural networks,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 37, pp. 128 825– 128 846, 2024

2024
[156]

Spike-driven transformer v2: Meta spiking neural network architecture inspiring the design of next-generation neuromorphic chips,

M. Yao, J. Hu, T. Hu, Y . Xu, Z. Zhou, Y . Tian, B. XU, and G. Li, “Spike-driven transformer v2: Meta spiking neural network architecture inspiring the design of next-generation neuromorphic chips,” inThe Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024

2024
[157]

Spikelm: Towards general spike-driven language modeling via elastic bi-spiking mechanisms,

X. Xing, Z. Zhang, Z. Ni, S. Xiao, Y . Ju, S. Fan, Y . Wang, J. Zhang, and G. Li, “Spikelm: Towards general spike-driven language modeling via elastic bi-spiking mechanisms,” inInternational Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2024, pp. 54 698–54 714

2024
[158]

Spikellm: Scaling up spiking neural network to large language models via saliency-based spiking,

X. Xing, B. Gao, Z. Zhang, D. A. Clifton, S. Xiao, L. Du, G. Li, and J. Zhang, “Spikellm: Scaling up spiking neural network to large language models via saliency-based spiking,” inThe Thirteenth Inter- national Conference on Learning Representations, 2025

2025
[159]

SpikeGPT: Generative pre-trained language model with spiking neural networks,

R.-J. Zhu, Q. Zhao, G. Li, and J. Eshraghian, “SpikeGPT: Generative pre-trained language model with spiking neural networks,”Transac- tions on Machine Learning Research, 2024

2024
[160]

Spgesture: Source-free domain-adaptive sEMG-based gesture recognition with jaccard attentive spiking neural network,

W. Guo, Y . Sun, Y . Xu, Z. Qiao, Y . Yang, and H. Xiong, “Spgesture: Source-free domain-adaptive sEMG-based gesture recognition with jaccard attentive spiking neural network,” inThe Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024

2024
[161]

Spike-based neuromorphic model for sound source localization,

D. Zhang, S. Wang, A. Belatreche, W. Wei, Y . Xiao, H. Zheng, Z. Zhou, M. Zhang, and Y . Yang, “Spike-based neuromorphic model for sound source localization,” inThe Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024

2024
[162]

Decision spikeformer: Spike-driven transformer for decision making,

W. Huang, Q. Gu, and N. Ye, “Decision spikeformer: Spike-driven transformer for decision making,” inProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, 2025, pp. 19 241–19 250

2025
[163]

Spiking vision transformer with saccadic attention,

S. Wang, M. Zhang, D. Zhang, A. Belatreche, Y . Xiao, Y . Liang, Y . Shan, Q. Sun, E. Zhang, and Y . Yang, “Spiking vision transformer with saccadic attention,” inThe Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2025

2025
[164]

Spiking transformers for event-based single object tracking,

J. Zhang, B. Dong, H. Zhang, J. Ding, F. Heide, B. Yin, and X. Yang, “Spiking transformers for event-based single object tracking,” inPro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022, pp. 8801–8810

2022
[165]

Spike transformer: Monocular depth estimation for spiking camera,

J. Zhang, L. Tang, Z. Yu, J. Lu, and T. Huang, “Spike transformer: Monocular depth estimation for spiking camera,” inEuropean Confer- ence on Computer Vision. Springer, 2022, pp. 34–52

2022
[166]

Spatial- temporal self-attention for asynchronous spiking neural networks

Y . Wang, K. Shi, C. Lu, Y . Liu, M. Zhang, and H. Qu, “Spatial- temporal self-attention for asynchronous spiking neural networks.” in IJCAI, 2023, pp. 3085–3093

2023
[167]

Spikingbert: Distilling bert to train spiking language models using implicit differentiation,

M. Bal and A. Sengupta, “Spikingbert: Distilling bert to train spiking language models using implicit differentiation,” inProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol. 38, 2024, pp. 10 998– 11 006

2024
[168]

Spiking wavelet transformer,

Y . Fang, Z. Wang, L. Zhang, J. Cao, H. Chen, and R. Xu, “Spiking wavelet transformer,” inEuropean Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 2024, pp. 19–37

2024
[169]

One-step spiking transformer with a linear complexity,

X. Song, A. Song, R. Xiao, and Y . Sun, “One-step spiking transformer with a linear complexity,” inProceedings of the Thirty-Third Interna- tional Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2024, pp. 3142–3150

2024
[170]

Tim: an efficient temporal interaction module for spiking transformer,

S. Shen, D. Zhao, G. Shen, and Y . Zeng, “Tim: an efficient temporal interaction module for spiking transformer,” inProceedings of the Thirty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2024, pp. 3133–3141

2024
[171]

Pssd-transformer: Powerful sparse spike-driven transformer for image semantic segmen- tation,

H. Wang, X. Liang, T. Zhang, Y . Gu, and W. Geng, “Pssd-transformer: Powerful sparse spike-driven transformer for image semantic segmen- tation,” inProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2024, pp. 758–767

2024
[172]

Advancing spiking neural networks towards multiscale spatiotemporal interaction learning,

Y . Shan, M. Zhang, R.-j. Zhu, X. Qiu, J. K. Eshraghian, and H. Qu, “Advancing spiking neural networks towards multiscale spatiotemporal interaction learning,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 39, 2025, pp. 1501–1509

2025
[173]

Spiking point transformer for point cloud classification,

P. Wu, B. Chai, H. Li, M. Zheng, Y . Peng, Z. Wang, X. Nie, Y . Zhang, and X. Sun, “Spiking point transformer for point cloud classification,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 39, 2025, pp. 21 563–21 571

2025
[174]

Fsta-snn: Frequency-based spatial-temporal attention module for spiking neural networks,

K. Yu, T. Zhang, H. Wang, and Q. Xu, “Fsta-snn: Frequency-based spatial-temporal attention module for spiking neural networks,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 39, 2025, pp. 22 227–22 235

2025
[175]

Fully spiking variational autoencoder,

H. Kamata, Y . Mukuta, and T. Harada, “Fully spiking variational autoencoder,” inProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol. 36, 2022, pp. 7059–7067

2022
[176]

Brain-inspired multilayer perceptron with spiking neurons,

W. Li, H. Chen, J. Guo, Z. Zhang, and Y . Wang, “Brain-inspired multilayer perceptron with spiking neurons,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022, pp. 783–793

2022
[177]

Recognizing high- speed moving objects with spike camera,

J. Zhao, J. Ye, S. Shiliang, Z. Yu, and T. Huang, “Recognizing high- speed moving objects with spike camera,” inProceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2023, pp. 7657–7665

2023
[178]

Event-based video reconstruction via potential-assisted spiking neural network,

L. Zhu, X. Wang, Y . Chang, J. Li, T. Huang, and Y . Tian, “Event-based video reconstruction via potential-assisted spiking neural network,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2022, pp. 3594–3604

2022
[179]

Spiking nerf: Representing the real-world geometry by a discontinuous representation,

Z. Liao, Y . Liu, Q. Zheng, and G. Pan, “Spiking nerf: Representing the real-world geometry by a discontinuous representation,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 38, 2024, pp. 13 790–13 798

2024
[180]

Spikenerf: Learning neural radiance fields from continuous spike stream,

L. Zhu, K. Jia, Y . Zhao, Y . Qi, L. Wang, and H. Huang, “Spikenerf: Learning neural radiance fields from continuous spike stream,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 6285–6295

2024
[181]

Spikepoint: An efficient point-based spiking neural network for event cameras action recognition,

H. Ren, Y . Zhou, X. LIN, Y . Huang, H. FU, J. Song, and B. Cheng, “Spikepoint: An efficient point-based spiking neural network for event cameras action recognition,” inThe Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024

2024
[182]

Learning to time-decode in spiking neural networks through the information bottleneck,

N. Skatchkovsky, O. Simeone, and H. Jang, “Learning to time-decode in spiking neural networks through the information bottleneck,”Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 34, pp. 17 049– 17 059, 2021

2021
[183]

Unsupervised optical flow estimation with dynamic timing representation for spike camera,

L. Xia, Z. Ding, R. Zhao, J. Zhang, L. Ma, Z. Yu, T. Huang, and R. Xiong, “Unsupervised optical flow estimation with dynamic timing representation for spike camera,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 36, pp. 48 070–48 082, 2023

2023
[184]

A low latency adaptive coding spike framework for deep reinforcement learning,

L. Qin, R. Yan, and H. Tang, “A low latency adaptive coding spike framework for deep reinforcement learning,” inProceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2023, pp. 3049–3057

2023
[185]

Event-enhanced multi-modal spiking neural network for dynamic obstacle avoidance,

Y . Wang, B. Dong, Y . Zhang, Y . Zhou, H. Mei, Z. Wei, and X. Yang, “Event-enhanced multi-modal spiking neural network for dynamic obstacle avoidance,” inProceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2023, pp. 3138–3148

2023
[186]

Darwin: a neuromorphic hardware co-processor based on spiking neural networks

J. Shen, D. Ma, Z. Gu, M. Zhang, X. Zhu, X. Xu, Q. Xu, Y . Shen, and G. Pan, “Darwin: a neuromorphic hardware co-processor based on spiking neural networks.”Sci. China Inf. Sci., vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 1–5, 2016

2016
[187]

Loihi: A neuromorphic manycore processor with on-chip learning,

M. Davies, N. Srinivasa, T.-H. Lin, G. Chinya, Y . Cao, S. H. Choday, G. Dimou, P. Joshi, N. Imam, S. Jainet al., “Loihi: A neuromorphic manycore processor with on-chip learning,”Ieee Micro, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 82–99, 2018

2018
[188]

D. O. Hebb,The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory. Psychology press, 2005

2005
[189]

Spike timing depen- dent plasticity finds the start of repeating patterns in continuous spike trains,

T. Masquelier, R. Guyonneau, and S. J. Thorpe, “Spike timing depen- dent plasticity finds the start of repeating patterns in continuous spike trains,”PloS one, vol. 3, p. e1377, 2008

2008
[190]

Neuromodulated spike-timing- dependent plasticity, and theory of three-factor learning rules,

N. Fr ´emaux and W. Gerstner, “Neuromodulated spike-timing- dependent plasticity, and theory of three-factor learning rules,”Fron- tiers in neural circuits, vol. 9, p. 85, 2016

2016
[191]

Mirrored stdp implements autoencoder learning in a network of spiking neurons,

K. S. Burbank, “Mirrored stdp implements autoencoder learning in a network of spiking neurons,”PLoS computational biology, vol. 11, p. e1004566, 2015

2015
[192]

Acquisition of visual features through probabilistic spike-timing-dependent plasticity,

A. Tavanaei, T. Masquelier, and A. S. Maida, “Acquisition of visual features through probabilistic spike-timing-dependent plasticity,” in 2016 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). IEEE, 2016, pp. 307–314

2016
[193]

Solving the distal reward problem through linkage of stdp and dopamine signaling,

E. M. Izhikevich, “Solving the distal reward problem through linkage of stdp and dopamine signaling,”Cerebral cortex, vol. 17, pp. 2443– 2452, 2007

2007
[194]

A learning theory for reward-modulated spike-timing-dependent plasticity with application to biofeedback,

R. Legenstein, D. Pecevski, and W. Maass, “A learning theory for reward-modulated spike-timing-dependent plasticity with application to biofeedback,”PLoS computational biology, vol. 4, p. e1000180, 2008. JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 14, NO. 8, AUGUST 2021 26

2008
[195]

The backpropagation algorithm implemented on spiking neuromorphic hardware,

A. Renner, F. Sheldon, A. Zlotnik, L. Tao, and A. Sornborger, “The backpropagation algorithm implemented on spiking neuromorphic hardware,”Nature Communications, vol. 15, p. 9691, 2024

2024
[196]

Brain-inspired global-local learning in- corporated with neuromorphic computing,

Y . Wu, R. Zhao, J. Zhu, F. Chen, M. Xu, G. Li, S. Song, L. Deng, G. Wang, H. Zhenget al., “Brain-inspired global-local learning in- corporated with neuromorphic computing,”Nature Communications, vol. 13, p. 65, 2022

2022
[197]

Fusing event-based camera and radar for slam using spiking neural networks with continual stdp learning,

A. Safa, T. Verbelen, I. Ocket, A. Bourdoux, H. Sahli, F. Catthoor, and G. Gielen, “Fusing event-based camera and radar for slam using spiking neural networks with continual stdp learning,” in2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2023, pp....

2023
[198]

Dendritic localized learning: Toward biologically plausible algorithm,

C. Lv, J. Xu, Y . Lu, X. Wang, Z. Wang, Z. Xu, D. Yu, X. Du, X. Zheng, and X. Huang, “Dendritic localized learning: Toward biologically plausible algorithm,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09976, 2025

2025 arXiv
[199]

Hebbian deep learning without feedback,

A. Journ ´e, H. G. Rodriguez, Q. Guo, and T. Moraitis, “Hebbian deep learning without feedback,” inThe Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023

2023
[200]

Unifying activation-and timing- based learning rules for spiking neural networks,

J. Kim, K. Kim, and J.-J. Kim, “Unifying activation-and timing- based learning rules for spiking neural networks,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 33, pp. 19 534–19 544, 2020

2020
[201]

Take a shortcut back: Mitigating the gradient vanishing for training spiking neural networks,

Y . Guo, Y . Chen, Z. Hao, W. Peng, Z. Jie, Y . Zhang, X. Liu, and Z. Ma, “Take a shortcut back: Mitigating the gradient vanishing for training spiking neural networks,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 37, pp. 24 849–24 867, 2024

2024
[202]

Advancing train- ing efficiency of deep spiking neural networks through rate-based backpropagation,

C. Yu, L. Liu, G. Wang, E. Li, and A. Wang, “Advancing train- ing efficiency of deep spiking neural networks through rate-based backpropagation,” inThe Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024

2024
[203]

Learnable surrogate gradient for direct training spiking neural networks

S. Lian, J. Shen, Q. Liu, Z. Wang, R. Yan, and H. Tang, “Learnable surrogate gradient for direct training spiking neural networks.” in IJCAI, 2023, pp. 3002–3010

2023
[204]

Adaptive smoothing gradient learning for spiking neural networks,

Z. Wang, R. Jiang, S. Lian, R. Yan, and H. Tang, “Adaptive smoothing gradient learning for spiking neural networks,” inInternational confer- ence on machine learning. PMLR, 2023, pp. 35 798–35 816

2023
[205]

Differen- tiable spike: Rethinking gradient-descent for training spiking neural networks,

Y . Li, Y . Guo, S. Zhang, S. Deng, Y . Hai, and S. Gu, “Differen- tiable spike: Rethinking gradient-descent for training spiking neural networks,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 34, pp. 23 426–23 439, 2021

2021
[206]

Sparse spiking gradient descent,

N. Perez-Nieves and D. Goodman, “Sparse spiking gradient descent,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 34, pp. 11 795–11 808, 2021

2021
[207]

Surrogate module learning: Reduce the gradient error accumulation in training spiking neural networks,

S. Deng, H. Lin, Y . Li, and S. Gu, “Surrogate module learning: Reduce the gradient error accumulation in training spiking neural networks,” inInternational Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2023, pp. 7645–7657

2023
[208]

DeepTAGE: Deep temporal-aligned gradient enhancement for optimizing spiking neural networks,

W. Liu, L. Yang, M. Zhao, S. Wang, J. Gao, W. Li, B. Li, and W. Hu, “DeepTAGE: Deep temporal-aligned gradient enhancement for optimizing spiking neural networks,” inThe Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2025

2025
[209]

Spatio-temporal back- propagation for training high-performance spiking neural networks,

Y . Wu, L. Deng, G. Li, J. Zhu, and L. Shi, “Spatio-temporal back- propagation for training high-performance spiking neural networks,” Frontiers in neuroscience, vol. 12, p. 331, 2018

2018
[210]

Error-backpropagation in temporally encoded networks of spiking neurons,

S. M. Bohte, J. N. Kok, and H. La Poutre, “Error-backpropagation in temporally encoded networks of spiking neurons,”Neurocomputing, vol. 48, no. 1-4, pp. 17–37, 2002

2002
[211]

Exploring loss functions for time-based training strategy in spiking neural networks,

Y . Zhu, W. Fang, X. Xie, T. Huang, and Z. Yu, “Exploring loss functions for time-based training strategy in spiking neural networks,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 36, pp. 65 366–65 379, 2023

2023
[212]

Training spiking neural networks with event-driven backpropagation,

Y . Zhu, Z. Yu, W. Fang, X. Xie, T. Huang, and T. Masquelier, “Training spiking neural networks with event-driven backpropagation,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 30 528–30 541, 2022

2022
[213]

Anp-i: A 28-nm 1.5-pj/sop asynchronous spiking neural network processor enabling sub-0.1-µj/sample on-chip learning for edge-ai applications,

J. Zhang, D. Huo, J. Zhang, C. Qian, Q. Liu, L. Pan, Z. Wang, N. Qiao, K.-T. Tang, and H. Chen, “Anp-i: A 28-nm 1.5-pj/sop asynchronous spiking neural network processor enabling sub-0.1-µj/sample on-chip learning for edge-ai applications,”IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, ...

2024
[214]

Spikezip-tf: conversion is all you need for transformer-based snn,

K. You, Z. Xu, C. Nie, Z. Deng, Q. Guo, X. Wang, and Z. He, “Spikezip-tf: conversion is all you need for transformer-based snn,” inProceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning, 2024, pp. 57 367–57 383

2024
[215]

Spikedattention: Training-free and fully spike-driven transformer-to-snn conversion with winner-oriented spike shift for softmax operation,

S. Hwang, S. Lee, D. Park, D. Lee, and J. Kung, “Spikedattention: Training-free and fully spike-driven transformer-to-snn conversion with winner-oriented spike shift for softmax operation,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 37, pp. 67 422–67 445, 2024

2024
[216]

Efficient and accurate conversion of spiking neural network with burst spikes,

Y . Li and Y . Zeng, “Efficient and accurate conversion of spiking neural network with burst spikes,” inProceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-22, 2022, pp. 2485–2491

2022
[217]

Enof-snn: Training accurate spiking neural networks via enhancing the output feature,

Y . Guo, W. Peng, X. Liu, Y . Chen, Y . Zhang, X. Tong, Z. Jie, and Z. Ma, “Enof-snn: Training accurate spiking neural networks via enhancing the output feature,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 37, pp. 51 708–51 726, 2024

2024
[218]

Bkdsnn: Enhancing the performance of learning-based spiking neural networks training with blurred knowledge distillation,

Z. Xu, K. You, Q. Guo, X. Wang, and Z. He, “Bkdsnn: Enhancing the performance of learning-based spiking neural networks training with blurred knowledge distillation,” inEuropean Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 2024, pp. 106–123

2024
[219]

A free lunch from ann: Towards efficient, accurate spiking neural networks calibration,

Y . Li, S. Deng, X. Dong, R. Gong, and S. Gu, “A free lunch from ann: Towards efficient, accurate spiking neural networks calibration,” inInternational conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2021, pp. 6316–6325

2021
[220]

Adaptive calibration: A unified conversion framework of spiking neural networks,

Z. Wang, Y . Fang, J. Cao, H. Ren, and R. Xu, “Adaptive calibration: A unified conversion framework of spiking neural networks,” inProceed- ings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 39, 2025, pp. 1583–1591

2025
[221]

Rethinking the membrane dynamics and optimization objectives of spiking neural networks,

H. Shen, Q. Zheng, H. Wang, and G. Pan, “Rethinking the membrane dynamics and optimization objectives of spiking neural networks,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 37, pp. 92 697–92 720, 2024

2024
[222]

Spiking transformer with experts mixture,

Z. Zhou, Y . Lu, Y . Jia, K. Che, J. Niu, L. Huang, X. Shi, Y . Zhu, G. Li, Z. Yuet al., “Spiking transformer with experts mixture,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 37, pp. 10 036–10 059, 2024

2024
[223]

Towards memory-and time-efficient backpropagation for training spiking neural networks,

Q. Meng, M. Xiao, S. Yan, Y . Wang, Z. Lin, and Z.-Q. Luo, “Towards memory-and time-efficient backpropagation for training spiking neural networks,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2023, pp. 6166–6176

2023
[224]

Spiking deep convolutional neural networks for energy-efficient object recognition,

Y . Cao, Y . Chen, and D. Khosla, “Spiking deep convolutional neural networks for energy-efficient object recognition,”International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 113, pp. 54–66, 2015

2015
[225]

Optimal ann-snn conversion for fast and accurate inference in deep spiking neural networks,

J. Ding, Z. Yu, Y . Tian, and T. Huang, “Optimal ann-snn conversion for fast and accurate inference in deep spiking neural networks,” in Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-21, 2021, pp. 2328–2336

2021
[226]

Optimal ANN- SNN conversion for high-accuracy and ultra-low-latency spiking neural networks,

T. Bu, W. Fang, J. Ding, P. DAI, Z. Yu, and T. Huang, “Optimal ANN- SNN conversion for high-accuracy and ultra-low-latency spiking neural networks,” inInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2022

2022
[227]

Towards high-performance spiking transformers from ann to snn conversion,

Z. Huang, X. Shi, Z. Hao, T. Bu, J. Ding, Z. Yu, and T. Huang, “Towards high-performance spiking transformers from ann to snn conversion,” inProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2024, pp. 10 688–10 697

2024
[228]

Rethinking the performance comparison between snns and anns,

L. Deng, Y . Wu, X. Hu, L. Liang, Y . Ding, G. Li, G. Zhao, P. Li, and Y . Xie, “Rethinking the performance comparison between snns and anns,”Neural networks, vol. 121, pp. 294–307, 2020

2020
[229]

Edge-cloud polarization and collaboration: A comprehensive survey for ai,

J. Yao, S. Zhang, Y . Yao, F. Wang, J. Ma, J. Zhang, Y . Chu, L. Ji, K. Jia, T. Shenet al., “Edge-cloud polarization and collaboration: A comprehensive survey for ai,”IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 6866–6886, 2022

2022
[230]

Adaptive deep spiking neural network with global-local learning via balanced excitatory and inhibitory mechanism,

T. Jiang, Q. Xu, X. Ran, J. Shen, P. Lv, Q. Zhang, and G. Pan, “Adaptive deep spiking neural network with global-local learning via balanced excitatory and inhibitory mechanism,” inThe Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024

2024
[231]

Eicil: Joint excitatory inhibitory cycle iteration learning for deep spiking neural networks,

Z. Shao, X. Fang, Y . Li, C. Feng, J. Shen, and Q. Xu, “Eicil: Joint excitatory inhibitory cycle iteration learning for deep spiking neural networks,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 36, pp. 32 117–32 128, 2023

2023
[232]

Spiking neural network as adaptive event stream slicer,

J. Cao, M. Sun, Z. Wang, H. Cheng, Q. Zhang, shibo zhou, and R. Xu, “Spiking neural network as adaptive event stream slicer,” inThe Thirty- eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024

2024
[233]

N-imagenet: Towards robust, fine-grained object recognition with event cameras,

J. Kim, J. Bae, G. Park, D. Zhang, and Y . M. Kim, “N-imagenet: Towards robust, fine-grained object recognition with event cameras,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2021, pp. 2146–2156

2021
[234]

Neuromorphic sensory systems,

S.-C. Liu and T. Delbruck, “Neuromorphic sensory systems,”Current opinion in neurobiology, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 288–295, 2010

2010
[235]

Retinomorphic event-based vision sensors: bioinspired cameras with spiking output,

C. Posch, T. Serrano-Gotarredona, B. Linares-Barranco, and T. Del- bruck, “Retinomorphic event-based vision sensors: bioinspired cameras with spiking output,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 102, no. 10, pp. 1470–1484, 2014. JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 14, NO. 8, AUGUST 2021 27

2014
[236]

Event- based vision: A survey,

G. Gallego, T. Delbr ¨uck, G. Orchard, C. Bartolozzi, B. Taba, A. Censi, S. Leutenegger, A. J. Davison, J. Conradt, K. Daniilidiset al., “Event- based vision: A survey,”IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 154–180, 2020

2020
[237]

A 128×128 120 db 15µsec latency asynchronous temporal contrast vision sensro,

P. Lichesteiner, C. Posch, and T. Delbruck, “A 128×128 120 db 15µsec latency asynchronous temporal contrast vision sensro,”IEEE Jornal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 566–576, 2008

2008
[238]

Design of an rgbw color vga rolling and global shutter dynamic and active-pixel vision sensor,

C. Li, C. Brandli, R. Berner, H. Liu, M. Yang, S.-C. Liu, and T. Delbruck, “Design of an rgbw color vga rolling and global shutter dynamic and active-pixel vision sensor,” in2015 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS). IEEE, 2015, pp. 718– 721

2015
[239]

Live demonstration: A 768×640 pixels 200meps dynamic vision sensor,

M. Guo, J. Huang, and S. Chen, “Live demonstration: A 768×640 pixels 200meps dynamic vision sensor,” in2017 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS). IEEE, 2017, pp. 1–1

2017
[240]

Event- based tone mapping for asynchronous time-based image sensor,

C. Simon Chane, S.-H. Ieng, C. Posch, and R. B. Benosman, “Event- based tone mapping for asynchronous time-based image sensor,”Fron- tiers in neuroscience, vol. 10, p. 391, 2016

2016
[241]

Scidvs: A scientific event camera with 1.7% temporal contrast sensitivity at 0.7 lux,

R. Graca, S. Zhou, B. McReynolds, and T. Delbruck, “Scidvs: A scientific event camera with 1.7% temporal contrast sensitivity at 0.7 lux,” in2024 IEEE European Solid-State Electronics Research Conference (ESSERC). IEEE, 2024, pp. 205–208

2024
[242]

Event camera data pre-training,

Y . Yang, L. Pan, and L. Liu, “Event camera data pre-training,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2023, pp. 10 699–10 709

2023
[243]

Seeing motion at nighttime with an event camera,

H. Liu, S. Peng, L. Zhu, Y . Chang, H. Zhou, and L. Yan, “Seeing motion at nighttime with an event camera,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 25 648–25 658

2024
[244]

Evhandpose: Event- based 3d hand pose estimation with sparse supervision,

J. Jiang, J. Li, B. Zhang, X. Deng, and B. Shi, “Evhandpose: Event- based 3d hand pose estimation with sparse supervision,”IEEE Trans- actions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2024

2024
[245]

Recurrent vision transformers for object detection with event cameras,

M. Gehrig and D. Scaramuzza, “Recurrent vision transformers for object detection with event cameras,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2023, pp. 13 884–13 893

2023
[246]

Leod: Label- efficient object detection for event cameras,

Z. Wu, M. Gehrig, Q. Lyu, X. Liu, and I. Gilitschenski, “Leod: Label- efficient object detection for event cameras,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 16 933–16 943

2024
[247]

Chasing day and night: Towards robust and efficient all-day object detection guided by an event camera,

J. Cao, X. Zheng, Y . Lyu, J. Wang, R. Xu, and L. Wang, “Chasing day and night: Towards robust and efficient all-day object detection guided by an event camera,” in2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2024, pp. 9026–9032

2024
[248]

Continuous-time object segmentation using high temporal resolution event camera,

L. Zhu, X. Chen, L. Wang, X. Wang, Y . Tian, and H. Huang, “Continuous-time object segmentation using high temporal resolution event camera,”IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2024

2024
[249]

Event-assisted low-light video object segmentation,

H. Li, J. Wang, J. Yuan, Y . Li, W. Weng, Y . Peng, Y . Zhang, Z. Xiong, and X. Sun, “Event-assisted low-light video object segmentation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 3250–3259

2024
[250]

Hpl-ess: Hybrid pseudo-labeling for unsupervised event-based semantic segmentation,

L. Jing, Y . Ding, Y . Gao, Z. Wang, X. Yan, D. Wang, G. Schaefer, H. Fang, B. Zhao, and X. Li, “Hpl-ess: Hybrid pseudo-labeling for unsupervised event-based semantic segmentation,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2024, pp. ...

2024
[251]

Openess: Event-based semantic scene understanding with open vocabularies,

L. Kong, Y . Liu, L. X. Ng, B. R. Cottereau, and W. T. Ooi, “Openess: Event-based semantic scene understanding with open vocabularies,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 15 686–15 698

2024
[252]

Secrets of event-based optical flow, depth and ego-motion estimation by contrast maximiza- tion,

S. Shiba, Y . Klose, Y . Aoki, and G. Gallego, “Secrets of event-based optical flow, depth and ego-motion estimation by contrast maximiza- tion,”IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2024

2024
[253]

Event-based monoc- ular depth estimation with recurrent transformers,

X. Liu, J. Li, J. Shi, X. Fan, Y . Tian, and D. Zhao, “Event-based monoc- ular depth estimation with recurrent transformers,”IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2024

2024
[254]

Even: An event-based framework for monocular depth estimation at adverse night conditions,

P. Shi, J. Peng, J. Qiu, X. Ju, F. P. W. Lo, and B. Lo, “Even: An event-based framework for monocular depth estimation at adverse night conditions,” in2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–7

2023
[255]

Lightweight event- based optical flow estimation via iterative deblurring,

Y . Wu, F. Paredes-Vall ´es, and G. C. De Croon, “Lightweight event- based optical flow estimation via iterative deblurring,” in2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2024, pp. 14 708–14 715

2024
[256]

Optical flow for spike camera with hierarchical spatial-temporal spike fusion,

R. Zhao, R. Xiong, J. Zhang, X. Zhang, Z. Yu, and T. Huang, “Optical flow for spike camera with hierarchical spatial-temporal spike fusion,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 38, 2024, pp. 7496–7504

2024
[257]

Deep learning for event-based vision: A comprehensive survey and benchmarks,

X. Zheng, Y . Liu, Y . Lu, T. Hua, T. Pan, W. Zhang, D. Tao, and L. Wang, “Deep learning for event-based vision: A comprehensive survey and benchmarks,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.08890, 2023

2023 arXiv
[258]

The heterogeneous deep neural network processor with a non-von neumann architecture,

D. Shin and H.-J. Yoo, “The heterogeneous deep neural network processor with a non-von neumann architecture,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 108, no. 8, pp. 1245–1260, 2019

2019
[259]

Sub-mw neuromorphic snn audio processing ap- plications with rockpool and xylo,

H. Bos and D. Muir, “Sub-mw neuromorphic snn audio processing ap- plications with rockpool and xylo,” inEmbedded Artificial Intelligence. River Publishers, 2023, pp. 69–78

2023
[260]

A comparison of temporal encoders for neuromorphic keyword spot- ting with few neurons,

M. Nilsson, T. J. Pina, L. Khacef, F. Liwicki, E. Chicca, and F. Sandin, “A comparison of temporal encoders for neuromorphic keyword spot- ting with few neurons,” in2023 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–7

2023
[261]

A binaural neuromorphic auditory sensor for fpga: a spike signal processing approach,

A. Jim ´enez-Fern´andez, E. Cerezuela-Escudero, L. Mir ´o-Amarante, M. J. Dom ´ınguez-Morales, F. de As ´ıs G ´omez-Rodr´ıguez, A. Linares- Barranco, and G. Jim ´enez-Moreno, “A binaural neuromorphic auditory sensor for fpga: a spike signal processing approach,”IEEE transactio...

2016
[262]

Spiketrum: An fpga-based imple- mentation of a neuromorphic cochlea,

M. A. Alsakkal and J. Wijekoon, “Spiketrum: An fpga-based imple- mentation of a neuromorphic cochlea,”IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 1648–1656, 2025

2025
[263]

Low-power spiking neural network audio source localisation using a hilbert transform audio event encoding scheme,

S. Haghighatshoar and D. R. Muir, “Low-power spiking neural network audio source localisation using a hilbert transform audio event encoding scheme,”Communications Engineering, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 18, 2025

2025
[264]

Neuroradar: A neuromorphic radar sensor for low-power iot systems,

K. Zheng, K. Qian, T. Woodford, and X. Zhang, “Neuroradar: A neuromorphic radar sensor for low-power iot systems,” inProceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, 2023, pp. 223–236

2023
[265]

Neuromorphic acoustic sensing using an adaptive microelectromechanical cochlea with integrated feedback,

C. Lenk, P. H ¨ovel, K. Ved, S. Durstewitz, T. Meurer, T. Fritsch, A. M ¨annchen, J. K ¨uller, D. Beer, T. Ivanovet al., “Neuromorphic acoustic sensing using an adaptive microelectromechanical cochlea with integrated feedback,”Nature electronics, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 370– 380, 2023

2023
[266]

Neuromorphic tactile edge orientation classification in an unsuper- vised spiking neural network,

F. L. Macdonald, N. F. Lepora, J. Conradt, and B. Ward-Cherrier, “Neuromorphic tactile edge orientation classification in an unsuper- vised spiking neural network,”Sensors, vol. 22, no. 18, p. 6998, 2022

2022
[267]

Neurotac: A neuro- morphic optical tactile sensor applied to texture recognition,

B. Ward-Cherrier, N. Pestell, and N. F. Lepora, “Neurotac: A neuro- morphic optical tactile sensor applied to texture recognition,” in2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2020, pp. 2654–2660

2020
[268]

A novel bioinspired neuromorphic vision-based tactile sensor for fast tactile perception,

O. Faris, M. I. Awad, M. A. Awad, Y . Zweiri, and K. Khalaf, “A novel bioinspired neuromorphic vision-based tactile sensor for fast tactile perception,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.10120, 2024

2024 arXiv
[269]

A natural biomimetic prosthetic hand with neuromorphic tactile sensing for precise and compliant grasping,

S. Sankar, W.-Y . Cheng, J. Zhang, A. Slepyan, M. M. Iskarous, R. J. Greene, R. DeBrabander, J. Chen, A. Gupta, and N. V . Thakor, “A natural biomimetic prosthetic hand with neuromorphic tactile sensing for precise and compliant grasping,”Science Advances, vol. 11, no. 10, p. ...

2025
[270]

Progress and prospects in flex- ible tactile sensors,

Y .-F. Liu, W. Wang, and X.-F. Chen, “Progress and prospects in flex- ible tactile sensors,”Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, vol. 11, p. 1264563, 2023

2023
[271]

A spiking and adapting tactile sensor for neuromorphic applications,

T. Birkoben, H. Winterfeld, S. Fichtner, A. Petraru, and H. Kohlstedt, “A spiking and adapting tactile sensor for neuromorphic applications,” Scientific reports, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 17260, 2020

2020
[272]

Event-based sensing and signal processing in the visual, auditory, and olfactory domain: a review,

M.-H. Tayarani-Najaran and M. Schmuker, “Event-based sensing and signal processing in the visual, auditory, and olfactory domain: a review,”Frontiers in Neural Circuits, vol. 15, p. 610446, 2021

2021
[273]

Autonomous artificial olfactory sensor systems with homeostasis recovery via a seamless neuromorphic architecture,

Y .-W. Jang, J. Kim, J. Shin, J.-W. Jo, J. W. Shin, Y .-H. Kim, S. W. Cho, and S. K. Park, “Autonomous artificial olfactory sensor systems with homeostasis recovery via a seamless neuromorphic architecture,” Advanced Materials, vol. 36, no. 29, p. 2400614, 2024

2024
[274]

Application of neuromorphic olfactory approach for high-accuracy classification of malts,

A. Vanarse, A. Osseiran, A. Rassau, and P. van der Made, “Application of neuromorphic olfactory approach for high-accuracy classification of malts,”Sensors, vol. 22, no. 2, p. 440, 2022

2022
[275]

An integrated toolbox for creating neuromorphic edge applications,

L. Niedermeier, N. Dutt, and J. L. Krichmar, “An integrated toolbox for creating neuromorphic edge applications,”Neuromorphic Computing and Engineering, 2025

2025
[276]

Spiking neural network integrated circuits: A review of trends and future directions,

A. Basu, L. Deng, C. Frenkel, and X. Zhang, “Spiking neural network integrated circuits: A review of trends and future directions,” in2022 IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (CICC), 2022, pp. 1–8

2022
[277]

Mead and M

C. Mead and M. Ismail,Analog VLSI implementation of neural systems. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012, vol. 80. JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 14, NO. 8, AUGUST 2021 28

2012
[278]

Darwin3: a large-scale neuromorphic chip with a novel isa and on-chip learning,

D. Ma, X. Jin, S. Sun, Y . Li, X. Wu, Y . Hu, F. Yang, H. Tang, X. Zhu, P. Linet al., “Darwin3: a large-scale neuromorphic chip with a novel isa and on-chip learning,”National Science Review, vol. 11, no. 5, p. nwae102, 2024

2024
[279]

A scalable multi- core architecture with heterogeneous memory structures for dynamic neuromorphic asynchronous processors (dynaps),

S. Moradi, N. Qiao, F. Stefanini, and G. Indiveri, “A scalable multi- core architecture with heterogeneous memory structures for dynamic neuromorphic asynchronous processors (dynaps),”IEEE transactions on biomedical circuits and systems, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 106–122, 2017

2017
[280]

Towards artificial general intelligence with hybrid tianjic chip architecture,

J. Pei, L. Deng, S. Song, M. Zhao, Y . Zhang, S. Wu, G. Wang, Z. Zou, Z. Wu, W. Heet al., “Towards artificial general intelligence with hybrid tianjic chip architecture,”Nature, vol. 572, no. 7767, pp. 106–111, 2019

2019
[281]

Tianjic: A unified and scalable chip bridging spike-based and continuous neural computation,

L. Deng, G. Wang, G. Li, S. Li, L. Liang, M. Zhu, Y . Wu, Z. Yang, Z. Zou, J. Peiet al., “Tianjic: A unified and scalable chip bridging spike-based and continuous neural computation,”IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 2228–2246, 2020

2020
[282]

Design and hardware implementation of neuromorphic sys- tems with rram synapses and threshold-controlled neurons for pattern recognition,

Y . Jiang, P. Huang, D. Zhu, Z. Zhou, R. Han, L. Liu, X. Liu, and J. Kang, “Design and hardware implementation of neuromorphic sys- tems with rram synapses and threshold-controlled neurons for pattern recognition,”IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, vo...

2018
[283]

Circuit implementation of on-chip trainable spiking neural network using cmos based memristive stdp synapses and lif neurons,

S. K. V ohra, S. A. Thomas, M. Sakare, and D. M. Das, “Circuit implementation of on-chip trainable spiking neural network using cmos based memristive stdp synapses and lif neurons,”Integration, vol. 95, p. 102122, 2024

2024
[284]

Full cmos circuit for brain-inspired associative memory with on-chip trainable memristive stdp synapse,

S. K. V ohra, S. A. Thomas, M. Sakare, D. M. Daset al., “Full cmos circuit for brain-inspired associative memory with on-chip trainable memristive stdp synapse,”IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 993–1003, 2023

2023
[285]

Unsupervised learning of digit recognition using spike-timing-dependent plasticity,

P. U. Diehl and M. Cook, “Unsupervised learning of digit recognition using spike-timing-dependent plasticity,”Frontiers in computational neuroscience, vol. 9, p. 99, 2015

2015
[286]

Bayesian compu- tation emerges in generic cortical microcircuits through spike-timing- dependent plasticity,

B. Nessler, M. Pfeiffer, L. Buesing, and W. Maass, “Bayesian compu- tation emerges in generic cortical microcircuits through spike-timing- dependent plasticity,”PLoS computational biology, vol. 9, no. 4, p. e1003037, 2013

2013
[287]

Y . Liu, Y . Ma, W. He, Z. Wang, L. Shen, J. Ru, R. Huang, and L. Ye, “An 82-nw 0.53-pj/sop clock-free spiking neural network with 40-µs latency for aiot wake-up functions using a multilevel-event- driven bionic architecture and computing-in-memory technique,”IEEE Transactions...

2023
[288]

Event-driven learning for spiking neural networks,

W. Wei, M. Zhang, J. Zhang, A. Belatreche, J. Wu, Z. Xu, X. Qiu, H. Chen, Y . Yang, and H. Li, “Event-driven learning for spiking neural networks,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.00270, 2024

2024 arXiv
[289]

An efficient neuromorphic implementation of temporal coding-based on-chip stdp learning,

Y . Zhong, Z. Wang, X. Cui, J. Cao, and Y . Wang, “An efficient neuromorphic implementation of temporal coding-based on-chip stdp learning,”IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 4241–4245, 2023

2023
[290]

Towards energy efficient spiking neural networks: An unstructured pruning framework,

X. Shi, J. Ding, Z. Hao, and Z. Yu, “Towards energy efficient spiking neural networks: An unstructured pruning framework,” inThe Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024

2024
[291]

Improving the sparse structure learning of spiking neural networks from the view of compression efficiency,

J. Shen, Q. Xu, G. Pan, and B. Chen, “Improving the sparse structure learning of spiking neural networks from the view of compression efficiency,” inThe Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2025

2025
[292]

Q-snns: Quantized spiking neural networks,

W. Wei, Y . Liang, A. Belatreche, Y . Xiao, H. Cao, Z. Ren, G. Wang, M. Zhang, and Y . Yang, “Q-snns: Quantized spiking neural networks,” inProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multi- media, 2024, pp. 8441–8450

2024
[293]

Neural architec- ture search for spiking neural networks,

Y . Kim, Y . Li, H. Park, Y . Venkatesha, and P. Panda, “Neural architec- ture search for spiking neural networks,” inEuropean conference on computer vision. Springer, 2022, pp. 36–56

2022
[294]

Differentiable hierarchical and surrogate gradient search for spiking neural networks,

K. Che, L. Leng, K. Zhang, J. Zhang, Q. Meng, J. Cheng, Q. Guo, and J. Liao, “Differentiable hierarchical and surrogate gradient search for spiking neural networks,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 24 975–24 990, 2022

2022
[295]

Esl-snns: An evolutionary structure learning strategy for spiking neural networks,

J. Shen, Q. Xu, J. K. Liu, Y . Wang, G. Pan, and H. Tang, “Esl-snns: An evolutionary structure learning strategy for spiking neural networks,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 37, no. 1, 2023, pp. 86–93

2023
[296]

Exploring lottery ticket hypothesis in spiking neural networks,

Y . Kim, Y . Li, H. Park, Y . Venkatesha, R. Yin, and P. Panda, “Exploring lottery ticket hypothesis in spiking neural networks,” inEuropean Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 2022, pp. 102–120

2022
[297]

Object detection with spiking neural networks on automotive event data,

L. Cordone, B. Miramond, and P. Thierion, “Object detection with spiking neural networks on automotive event data,” in2022 Interna- tional Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). IEEE, 2022, pp. 1–8

2022
[298]

Constructing deep spiking neural networks from artificial neural networks with knowledge distillation,

Q. Xu, Y . Li, J. Shen, J. K. Liu, H. Tang, and G. Pan, “Constructing deep spiking neural networks from artificial neural networks with knowledge distillation,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2023, pp. 7886–7895

2023
[299]

Temporal separation with entropy regularization for knowledge distillation in spiking neural networks,

K. Yu, C. Yu, T. Zhang, X. Zhao, S. Yang, H. Wang, Q. Zhang, and Q. Xu, “Temporal separation with entropy regularization for knowledge distillation in spiking neural networks,” inProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, 2025, pp. 8806–8816

2025
[300]

Apprenticeship-inspired elegance: synergistic knowledge distillation empowers spiking neural networks for efficient single-eye emotion recognition,

Y . Wang, H. Mei, Q. Bao, Z. Wei, M. Z. Shou, H. Li, B. Dong, and X. Yang, “Apprenticeship-inspired elegance: synergistic knowledge distillation empowers spiking neural networks for efficient single-eye emotion recognition,” inProceedings of the Thirty-Third International Join...

2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [12]

Opportunities for neuromorphic computing algorithms and applications,

C. D. Schuman, S. R. Kulkarni, M. Parsa, J. P. Mitchell, P. Date, and B. Kay, “Opportunities for neuromorphic computing algorithms and applications,”Nature Computational Science, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 10–19, 2022

2022

[2] [39]

Spiking neural networks and their applications: A review,

K. Yamazaki, V .-K. V o-Ho, D. Bulsara, and N. Le, “Spiking neural networks and their applications: A review,”Brain sciences, vol. 12, no. 7, p. 863, 2022

2022

[3] [40]

Exploring neuromorphic computing based on spiking neural networks: Algorithms to hardware,

N. Rathi, I. Chakraborty, A. Kosta, A. Sengupta, A. Ankit, P. Panda, and K. Roy, “Exploring neuromorphic computing based on spiking neural networks: Algorithms to hardware,”ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 1–49, 2023

2023

[4] [11]

Brain-inspired computing: A systematic survey and future trends,

G. Li, L. Deng, H. Tang, G. Pan, Y . Tian, K. Roy, and W. Maass, “Brain-inspired computing: A systematic survey and future trends,” Proceedings of the IEEE, 2024

2024

[5] [41]

Neuromorphic computing at scale,

D. Kudithipudi, C. Schuman, C. M. Vineyard, T. Pandit, C. Merkel, R. Kubendran, J. B. Aimone, G. Orchard, C. Mayr, R. Benosmanet al., “Neuromorphic computing at scale,”Nature, vol. 637, no. 8047, pp. 801–812, 2025

2025

[6] [1]

Large language model based multi-agents: a survey of progress and challenges,

T. Guo, X. Chen, Y . Wang, R. Chang, S. Pei, N. V . Chawla, O. Wiest, and X. Zhang, “Large language model based multi-agents: a survey of progress and challenges,” inProceedings of the Thirty-Third Interna- tional Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2024, pp. 8048–8057

2024

[7] [2]

Object detection in 20 years: A survey,

Z. Zou, K. Chen, Z. Shi, Y . Guo, and J. Ye, “Object detection in 20 years: A survey,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 257– 276, 2023

2023

[8] [3]

Benchmarking news recom- mendation in the era of green ai,

Q. Liu, J. Zhu, Q. Dai, and X.-M. Wu, “Benchmarking news recom- mendation in the era of green ai,” inCompanion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024, 2024, pp. 971–974

2024