Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Supersolidity in Optically Trapped Polariton Condensates

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports the experimental observation of a supersolid polariton condensate in an axially symmetric annular optical trap, with simultaneous crystalline and phase coherence and a zero-energy Nambu-Goldstone mode.

desk verdict A credible observation of a coherent density-modulated polariton condensate in an annular trap, but the spontaneous-supersolid claim is not yet established because the angular pattern is fitted with an explicit wedge-gradient perturbation. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.14585 v1 pith:J7RALRQI submitted 2025-07-19 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.quant-gas

P. N. Kozhevin , A. D. Liubomirov , R. V. Cherbunin , M. A. Chukeev , I. Yu. Chestnov , A. V. Kavokin , A. V. Nalitov This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.quant-gas
keywords microcavitypolaritonssupersoliditynonequilibriumBose-EinsteincondensatesannularopticaltrapNambu-Goldstonemodesreservoir-mediatedattractionexciton-polaritonsuperfluidsspontaneoussymmetrybreaking
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims to have observed a supersolid phase in a polariton condensate held in an axially symmetric annular optical trap. The condensate shows crystalline order along the ring, a periodic azimuthal density modulation visible in the angular density correlations, while remaining globally phase-coherent, so the two defining orders of a supersolid appear together. The authors argue the ordering is spontaneous, arising from an effective attraction mediated by the incoherent excitonic reservoir and from the nonequilibrium mode selection of the trap, and they support this with a zero-energy Nambu-Goldstone mode in the computed excitation spectrum. If correct, this makes polariton condensates a lattice-free platform for supersolidity, with the entire condensate in the supersolid phase rather than a density wave on top of a uniform superfluid.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is a two-component mean-field model: a complex condensate wavefunction $\Psi$ coupled to the density $n$ of an incoherent excitonic reservoir. The reservoir simultaneously provides the trapping potential and gain, and through stimulated scattering and hole burning it mediates an effective attraction that drives the instability of the uniform rotating superfluid. Near threshold the dynamics is reduced to a two-mode pseudospin model for the two counter-rotating angular momentum states $\pm l$, in which supersolid states appear as a continuous family of azimuthal standing waves with $S_z = 0$; the zero-energy Nambu-Goldstone mode is the zero eigenvalue of the linearized Jacobian for perturbations that rotate the density pattern. The same model, augmented with a weak gradient potential treated by first-order perturbation theory, reproduces the measured angular density and phase, and a semi-analytic threshold calculation explains the observed growth of the angular index with trap radius.

What would settle it

Repeat the experiment many times with the same nominally symmetric annular pump and record the angular orientation of the density petals; a spontaneously broken continuous symmetry should give an orientation distribution that is uniform or at least not locked to the cavity wedge, whereas a pinned pattern will have the same orientation in every shot. In addition, a direct pump-probe or resonant excitation measurement should reveal the predicted zero-energy rotational mode only if the symmetry breaking is spontaneous, so its absence in measured spectra would falsify the claimed supersolidity.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is the experimental demonstration of a supersolid polariton condensate in a continuous, axially symmetric optical trap. The measured emission has both diagonal long-range order, quantified by the angular density correlation function $g^{(2)}(\delta\varphi)$ with a pronounced modulation at the condensate's angular harmonics, and off-diagonal long-range order, quantified by a finite first-order coherence $g^{(1)}(\delta r)$ across the ring. The state is described by a mean-field model coupling the condensate wavefunction $\Psi$ to a normal-component exciton density $n$, in which reservoir-mediated attraction destabilizes the uniform rotating superfluid and stabilizes a continuum of azimuthal standing-wave states. The collective excitation spectrum of the supersolid contains a zero-energy Nambu-Goldstone mode beyond the gauge mode, which the paper interprets as the signature of spontaneously broken continuous radial symmetry. The paper also shows that the pattern's measured angular density and phase profiles are reproduced by including a weak potential gradient from the wedged-cavity geometry, and that the angular index $l$ of the condensate grows with trap radius, giving a lattice constant that scales as $a \propto R^{-1/2}$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the measured azimuthal density modulation is spontaneous breaking of the trap's continuous radial symmetry, rather than a pattern pinned by a small symmetry-breaking field such as the weak gradient of the wedged cavity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A supersolid polariton condensate can be created without an optical lattice or long-range dipolar interactions, using only a ring-shaped pump and reservoir-mediated attraction.
  • The full condensate occupies the supersolid phase, unlike the previously demonstrated photonic-crystal case, so its gapless Nambu-Goldstone excitations are in principle directly accessible to probing.
  • The lattice constant of the density modulation grows slowly with trap radius ($a \propto R^{-1/2}$), so the supersolid period can be tuned over a wide range of trap sizes while remaining observable.
  • Keeping the reservoir dynamics is essential; adiabatic elimination of the normal component fails to produce stable spontaneously modulated states in axially symmetric traps.
  • The same mechanism should generalize to other driven-dissipative condensates confined in symmetric traps, making supersolidity a generic feature of reservoir-mediated attraction rather than a special property of atomic dipolar gases.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the spontaneous character holds, a weak deliberate breaking of the trap's azimuthal symmetry should pin the pattern and turn the would-be Nambu-Goldstone mode into a gapped excitation; measuring that gapping would be a sharper test than the current steady-state images.
  • The paper's reliance on a wedged-cavity gradient to reproduce the measured angular profiles means the same gradient could be responsible for selecting the pattern's orientation; a shot-to-shot orientation histogram would distinguish spontaneous from field-pinned ordering.
  • The predicted $a \propto R^{-1/2}$ scaling implies the supersolid period is relatively insensitive to trap size, which could make the phase robust in devices with fabrication inhomogeneity, an implication the paper states quantitatively but does not develop as a design principle.
  • Although the zero-energy mode is computed from the model rather than measured, the structural similarity of the mode in the full numerics and the two-mode approximation suggests a low-frequency rotational mode should be visible in future spectroscopy; detecting its softness as the supersolid transition is approached would confirm the mechanism.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports experiments on exciton-polariton condensates confined in annular optically induced traps. The authors measure the real-space intensity and phase, the first-order coherence g^(1)(δr), and the angular density correlation g^(2)(δφ), and observe a 12-petal density modulation together with long-range phase coherence. They compare these observations with a two-mode mean-field model coupled to a nonadiabatic reservoir, and with numerical solutions of a generalized Gross-Pitaevskii-type model. From the computed collective excitation spectrum they identify an additional zero-energy Nambu-Goldstone mode in the supersolid state, attributed to spontaneous breaking of the continuous radial symmetry, and they derive scaling laws for the angular momentum and lattice constant versus trap radius. The central claim is stated in the Discussion: 'We demonstrated the formation of a supersolid polariton condensate phase, characterized with diagonal and off-diagonal long-range order, in axially symmetric optically induced traps.'

Significance. If the spontaneous character of the density modulation were firmly established, this would be a significant addition to the field: it would provide a new nonequilibrium platform for supersolidity that does not require an external lattice, and it would connect the reservoir-mediated attractive interaction to rotational-symmetry breaking. The manuscript has notable strengths: the interferometric measurement of g^(1) is carefully described; the two-mode analytic model and full numerical simulations are presented in detail; the harmonic decomposition and g^(2) analysis quantify the density order; and the comparison to prior work on annular trap condensates (Refs. [32,33]) is useful. However, the central claim depends on the density modulation being spontaneous, and the evidence for that is indirect and partly relies on fitted parameters; these issues are load-bearing.

major comments (3)
  1. [Supplementary 'Deformation in a uniform gradient potential', Eqs. (S1)-(S3) and Fig. S3] The measured angular density and phase profiles are reproduced with first-order perturbation theory in a weak potential slope, using the fitted complex value aRΔ/2|Δ|²=0.5i for the state in Fig. 2b. This potential gradient is an explicit symmetry-breaking field that couples l to l±1 and can select the orientation of the petal pattern. The manuscript gives no independent calibration of the gradient amplitude and no repeated-pump-cycle series showing that the petal orientation is random or drifts between realizations. Consequently, the observation of long-range phase coherence coexisting with periodic density modulation is also compatible with a symmetry-breaking-field-induced density wave, and the word 'spontaneous' in the central claim is not supported by the presented data. I request either orientation statistics from repeated single-shot measurements or an independent quantitative estimate of the gradient that demonstrates it is too weak to pin the orientation.
  2. [Figure 3 and Methods (Numerical simulations)] The zero-energy rotational Nambu-Goldstone mode is obtained by diagonalizing the linearized equations of the ideal two-mode model and of the full model; it is not an experimental observable in this work. In the presence of an explicit pinning field, such a mode would generically acquire a finite gap, so the computed mode does not, by itself, demonstrate that the sample breaks the radial symmetry spontaneously. To support the claim, the authors should either measure the soft mode (e.g., via fluctuation or response measurements) or provide a quantitative argument that the fitted wedge gradient is too weak to gap the rotational mode on the experimental timescale.
  3. [Supplementary 'Supersolid period scaling', Fig. S5a] The 'quantitative agreement' between theory and experiment for l(R) relies on rescaling the horizontal axis with R0=15 μm, adding an offset of 4 μm, and setting ε=α/β=3. The manuscript does not state whether these values are independently measured or constrained by other data, nor does it show how the comparison changes when they are varied. This weakens the derived scalings l∝R^{3/2} and a∝R^{-1/2} as experimental claims. Please add a parameter table and a sensitivity analysis, or clearly mark these curves as illustrative rather than quantitative.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors, including 'centrury' in the Abstract, 'exhcange' in the introduction, 'the the transition transition' in the first paragraph, 'Berezinski' instead of 'Berezinskii', 'emision' and 'agreemennt' in the Supplementary Information, and 'wavefuction' in the Supplementary Information; a careful proofread is needed.
  2. [Methods and References] Reference [39] in the Methods is not a citation to an external work but rather a parameter list; please format the parameters as a table or as part of the main text instead of burying them in a reference entry.
  3. [Eq. (S4)] The function H_l^(1) is not defined in the Supplementary Information; please state explicitly that it is a Hankel function of the first kind (or specify the appropriate radial function for the exterior region).
  4. [Fig. 1] In the typeset version, Fig. 1 contains garbled labels such as 'phase phase phase winding', 'den', and 'nsiiiiiiiiiiii...'; please regenerate the figure so that all labels are readable.
  5. [Discussion] The statement that the supersolid phase is unstable 'in the case of weak condensate-reservoir interactions' would be clearer if accompanied by a quantitative threshold (e.g., ε<1) tied to the parameters defined in the main text.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

The spontaneous-supersolid interpretation leans on a self-cited phase criterion and on a wedge-gradient perturbation fitted to the very angular profile it claims to reproduce; the measured 12-petal order and global coherence themselves remain independent facts.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Supplementary 'Deformation in a uniform gradient potential', Eqs. (S1)-(S3) and Fig. S3; main text 'Supersolid phase formation', Fig. 2e paragraph]
    "This coupling, as well as the angular dependence of the condensate density and phase and thus the density correlation, is reproduced by accounting for the weak potential slope, stemming form the wedged cavity geometry [37], with the first-order perturbation theory (see Supplementary Materials). ... An example of such a state, shown in Fig. 2b for θ=0 and aR∆/2|∆|^2 = 0.5i, is produced using the expression for the polariton condensate wavefuction [34]."

    The complex amplitude aR∆/2|∆|^2 enters the first-order perturbation coefficients (S3) as a free parameter. It is set to 0.5i to generate the theoretical angular density and phase shown in Fig. 2b, i.e. it is fitted to the same experimental angular profile that is then displayed as 'theory' agreement in Fig. 2d,e and Fig. S3. No independent calibration of the wedged-cavity gradient is provided. The agreement is therefore obtained by choosing the parameter, not by independent prediction. Moreover, this fitted term is an explicit l → l±1 symmetry-breaking perturbation, so the same fit used to reproduce the angular profiles supplies the external field whose absence is required for the spontaneous-supersolid and Nambu-Goldstone interpretation.

  2. self citation load bearing [Discussion, second paragraph; also 'Supersolid phase formation', fourth paragraph]
    "The full nonadiabatic model also predicts supersolid phase instability in the case of weak condensate-reservoir interactions, highlighting the significance of emergent reservoir-mediated attraction for stability of the supersolid phase [34]. ... the supersolid phase is reliably reached in the case of strong repulsive condensate-reservoir interactions ε > 1 in a wide range of parameters, where the superfluid phase is unstable [34]."

    The theoretical criterion that selects and stabilizes the supersolid phase over the vortex superfluid is imported from Ref. [34] by Chestnov, Cherotchenko and Nalitov, two of whom (Chestnov and Nalitov) are authors of the present paper. The claim that the observed petal state is a spontaneously formed supersolid rather than a disorder-pinned petal state rests on this imported phase diagram and on the two-mode equations (2)-(3) taken from [34]. The paper does perform its own numerical simulations of the full model, which gives independent support, but the analytical stability threshold and the nonadiabatic instability mechanism that are loaded into the interpretation are supported only by the overlapping-authors citation.

1 more flagged steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Supplementary 'Supersolid period scaling', Fig. S5 caption and surrounding text]
    "The dependence l(R), governed by the parameters ε=α/β and R0 = sqrt(ℏ/(mΓ)) was found to be in quantitative agreement with our experimental observations, as shown in Fig. S5. ... The dimensions are rescaled for clarity, with characteristic length R0 = 15µm and offset 4µm, corresponding to the radial broadening of the normal component ring. ... Interaction parameter: ε=3."

    The claimed quantitative agreement of the theoretical l(R) curve with the experimental step-like data is obtained after choosing the horizontal scale R0 = 15 µm, an additive offset of 4 µm, and the interaction parameter ε = 3. These choices are not independently measured in the paper; they are adjusted so that the theoretical steps line up with the observed |L| values. The asymptotic scaling l ∝ R^{3/2} is a genuine derivation, so the circularity is partial, but the specific 'quantitative agreement' used as confirmation is partly built in by the rescaling and parameter choice rather than being a free prediction.

full rationale

The central experimental facts—global first-order phase coherence and a 12-petal azimuthal density modulation with weak l = ±5,7 sidebands—are measured and are not manufactured by the theory. The two-mode superposition of l = ±6 modes already produces the main 2l density harmonic, so the core 'crystalline order plus coherence' observation has independent content. However, the interpretation of this state as a spontaneously formed supersolid leans on three partially circular supports: (i) the nonadiabatic reservoir-coupling instability and the ε > 1 stability criterion are imported from Ref. [34], whose authors overlap with the present paper (Chestnov and Nalitov); (ii) the angular density and phase curves, and the sideband weights they are said to reproduce, are produced with the free wedge-gradient parameter aR∆/2|∆|^2 fixed to 0.5i, making the 'theory' in Figs. 2b,d,e and S3 partly an interpolation rather than a prediction; and (iii) the claimed quantitative l(R) agreement is achieved only after choosing R0, an additive 4 µm offset, and ε = 3. The fitted gradient is an explicit symmetry-breaking field, so it is also the same term that makes the Nambu-Goldstone argument inapplicable to the actual sample unless repeated-shot orientation statistics demonstrate that the petal pattern is not pinned. These are partial circularities and evidential gaps, not a definitional collapse: the experiment could in principle have shown a uniform ring or a pinned petal state, and it did not. Score 5 reflects this partial, interpretation-level circularity while acknowledging the independent experimental content.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central theoretical claims rest on a standard mean-field polariton-reservoir model and on the two-mode truncation from the authors' previous work. Three parameters are effectively fitted to make theory match the presented data: a gradient perturbation amplitude, an axis rescaling, and the interaction ratio ε. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Gradient perturbation amplitude aR/|Δ|² = 0.5 (imaginary, in S3 example)
    Used to generate the theoretical density and phase profiles in Fig. 2b matched to experiment; the perturbation strength is chosen by hand and not independently measured.
  • Rescaling length R0 and offset in l(R) comparison = R0 = 15 µm, offset 4 µm
    In Fig. S5a the axes are rescaled with these values to make experimental |L| data follow the theoretical prediction; no independent measurement is cited.
  • Interaction ratio ε = α/β = 3
    Used in the semi-analytical l(R) and a(R) scaling calculations (Fig. S5b); set to 3 for comparison, not derived from the sample's independently measured parameters.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Two-mode truncation near threshold: only counter-rotating modes ±l and reservoir harmonics N0, N1, N2 are kept.
    The analytical model (2)-(3) relies on this truncation from Ref. [34]; no numerical justification for its accuracy is given except agreement with the full model in the stable parameter range.
  • domain assumption Single-scalar reservoir density n obeys Eq. (1b) with linear loss and stimulated scattering; energy-dependent reservoir effects are neglected.
    Standard mean-field reservoir model [35,36], but the nonadiabatic reservoir response is the mechanism claimed to produce effective attraction, so the model form is load-bearing.
  • domain assumption Weak potential gradient from the wedged cavity perturbs degenerate ±l modes weakly enough for first-order perturbation theory to apply.
    Supplementary Eqs. (S1)-(S3); load-bearing for matching the observed angular modulation and phase, and for the spontaneous-vs-pinned interpretation.
  • domain assumption The annular pump profile is axially symmetric up to the stated weak gradient; ideal symmetry is assumed for the spontaneous-breaking analysis.
    The theoretical supersolid solutions and NG mode rely on continuous rotational symmetry of the unperturbed trap; the wedge gradient is treated only as a small perturbation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Supersolidity in Optically Trapped Polariton Condensates." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/J7RALRQI

@misc{pith2026250714585,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Supersolidity in Optically Trapped Polariton Condensates},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/J7RALRQI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.14585}
}
read the original abstract

Superfluids under specific conditions can exhibit spontaneous breaking of continuous translation symmetries and form exotic spatially ordered states of matter known as supersolids. Despite its early theoretical prediction, it took over half-a-centrury to experimentally demonstrate the supersolid phase in ultracold atomic Bose-Einstein condensates, forming due to long-range interatomic interactions. Here we propose as a promising new platform for supersolidity exciton-polariton superfluids, confined in annular optically induced traps. The supersolid phase emerges due to effective attractive interactions, mediated by the normal excitonic component of the system. Experimental demonstration of spontaneously formed spatially ordered phase is in agreement with detailed mean-field theoretical analysis and numerical simulation. The spontaneous character of the observed supersolid transition is further evidenced by the formation of specific zero-energy Nambu-Goldstone modes in the collective excitation spectrum.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum tribology: acceleration-induced Stokes friction and Magnus force in correlated Bose fluids

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Rotation of an impurity in a condensate creates phonon emission channels that make friction possible below the Landau velocity and generate a non-dissipative transverse force.

  2. Probing intermittent polariton vortex dynamics with two-point correlations

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Time-resolved correlation measurements reveal intermittent switching between stationary and oscillating polariton condensate regimes near a bifurcation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [34]

    Physical Review B 109, 205304 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.109.205304

    Chestnov, I., Cherotchenko, E., Nalitov, A.: Nonadiabatic polariton condensation in annular optical traps. Physical Review B 109, 205304 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.109.205304

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    Physical Review A2, 256–258 (1970) https://doi.org/ Chester1970

    Chester, G.V.: Speculations on bose-einstein condensation and quantum crystals. Physical Review A2, 256–258 (1970) https://doi.org/ Chester1970

    work page 1970

  3. [2]

    Leggett, A.J.: Can a solid be ”super- fluid”? Physical Review Letters25, 1543–1546 (1970) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.25.1543

    work page 1970

  4. [3]

    Nature 427, 225–227 (2004) https://doi.org/10

    Kim, E., Chan, M.H.W.: Probable observa- tion of a supersolid helium phase. Nature 427, 225–227 (2004) https://doi.org/10. 1038/nature02220

    work page 2004

  5. [4]

    Nature450, 853–856 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06383

    Day, J., Beamish, J.: Low-temperature shear modulus changes in solid 4he and connection to supersolidity. Nature450, 853–856 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06383

    work page doi:10.1038/nature06383 2007

  6. [5]

    Nature 543, 91–94 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature21431

    Li, J.-R., Lee, J., Huang, W., Burch- esky, S., Shteynas, B., Top, F., Jami- son, A.O., Ketterle, W.: A stripe phase with supersolid properties in spin–orbit- coupled bose–einstein condensates. Nature 543, 91–94 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature21431

    work page 2017

  7. [6]

    Nature543, 87–90 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21067

    L´ eonard, J., Morales, A., Zupancic, P., Esslinger, T., Donner, T.: Supersolid forma- tion in a quantum gas breaking a continuous translational symmetry. Nature543, 87–90 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21067

    work page doi:10.1038/nature21067 2017

  8. [7]

    Nature574, 382–385 (2019) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41586-019-1568-6

    Tanzi, L., Roccuzzo, S.M., Lucioni, E., Fam` a, F., Fioretti, A., Gabbanini, C., Mod- ugno, G., Recati, A., Stringari, S.: Super- solid symmetry breaking from compres- sional oscillations in a dipolar quantum gas. Nature574, 382–385 (2019) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41586-019-1568-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1568-6 2019

Show all 41 references
  1. [8]

    Nature574, 386–389 (2019) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41586-019-1569-5

    Guo, M., B¨ ottcher, F., Hertkorn, J., Schmidt, J.-N., Wenzel, M., B¨ uchler, H.P., Lan- gen, T., Pfau, T.: The low-energy gold- stone mode in a trapped dipolar supersolid. Nature574, 386–389 (2019) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41586-019-1569-5

    2019 doi

  2. [9]

    Physical Review Letters90, 250403 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90

    Santos, L., Shlyapnikov, G.V., Lewenstein, M.: Roton-maxon spectrum and stability of trapped dipolar bose-einstein condensates. Physical Review Letters90, 250403 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90. 7 250403

    2003 doi

  3. [10]

    Physical Review Letters105(2010) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.135301

    Cinti, F., Jain, P., Boninsegni, M., Micheli, A., Zoller, P., Pupillo, G.: Supersolid droplet crystal in a dipole-blockaded gas. Physical Review Letters105(2010) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.135301

    2010 doi

  4. [11]

    Physical Review Let- ters104(2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.104.195302

    Henkel, N., Nath, R., Pohl, T.: Three- dimensional roton excitations and super- solid formation in rydberg-excited bose- einstein condensates. Physical Review Let- ters104(2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.104.195302

    2010

  5. [12]

    Physical Review Letters 108, 1–5 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.108.060401

    Matuszewski, M., Taylor, T., Kavokin, A.V.: Exciton supersolidity in hybrid bose- fermi systems. Physical Review Letters 108, 1–5 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.108.060401

    2012

  6. [13]

    Oxford Uni- versity Press, Oxford (2017)

    Kavokin, A.V., Baumberg, J.J., Malpuech, G., Laussy, F.P.: Microcavities. Oxford Uni- versity Press, Oxford (2017)

    2017

  7. [14]

    Phys- ical Review B90, 035413 (2014) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.035413

    Vishnevsky, D.V., Laussy, F.: Effective attractive polariton-polariton interaction mediated by an exciton reservoir. Phys- ical Review B90, 035413 (2014) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.035413

    2014 doi

  8. [15]

    Nature Communica- tions9, 2944 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-018-05349-4

    Estrecho, E., Gao, T., Bobrovska, N., Fraser, M.D., Steger, M., Pfeiffer, L., West, K., Liew, T.C.H., Matuszewski, M., Snoke, D.W., Truscott, A.G., Ostrovskaya, E.A.: Single- shot condensation of exciton polaritons and the hole burning effect. Nature Communica- tions9, 2944 (2...

    2018

  9. [16]

    Science332(6034), 1167–1170 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1202307 https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1202307

    Amo, A., Pigeon, S., Sanvitto, D., Sala, V.G., Hivet, R., Carusotto, I., Pisanello, F., Lem´ enager, G., Houdr´ e, R., Giacobino, E., Ciuti, C., Bramati, A.: Polariton superflu- ids reveal quantum hydrodynamic solitons. Science332(6034), 1167–1170 (2011) https://doi.org/10.112...

    2011 doi

  10. [17]

    Reviews of Modern Physics 85, 299–366 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1103/ RevModPhys.85.299

    Carusotto, I., Ciuti, C.: Quantum flu- ids of light. Reviews of Modern Physics 85, 299–366 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1103/ RevModPhys.85.299

    2013

  11. [18]

    Nature Physics4, 700–705 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1034

    Utsunomiya, S., Tian, L., Roumpos, G., Lai, C.W., Kumada, N., Fujisawa, T., Kuwata- Gonokami, M., L¨ offler, A., H¨ ofling, S., Forchel, A., Yamamoto, Y.: Observation of bogoliubov excitations in exciton-polariton condensates. Nature Physics4, 700–705 (2008) https://doi.org/10...

    2008 doi

  12. [19]

    Physical Review Letters106, 255302 (2011) https:// doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.255302

    Kohnle, V., L´ eger, Y., Wouters, M., Richard, M., Portella-Oberli, M.T., Deveaud-Pl´ edran, B.: From single particle to superfluid excita- tions in a dissipative polariton gas. Physical Review Letters106, 255302 (2011) https:// doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.255302

    2011 doi

  13. [20]

    Physical Review Letters126, 075301 (2021) https:// doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.075301

    Estrecho, E., Pieczarka, M., Wurdack, M., Steger, M., West, K., Pfeiffer, L., Snoke, D., Truscott, A., Ostrovskaya, E.: Low-energy collective oscillations and bogoliubov sound in an exciton-polariton condensate. Physical Review Letters126, 075301 (2021) https:// doi.org/10.110...

    2021 doi

  14. [21]

    Nature Physics4, 706–710 (2008) https:// doi.org/10.1038/nphys1051

    Lagoudakis, K.G., Wouters, M., Richard, M., Baas, A., Carusotto, I., Andr´ e, R., Dang, L.S., Deveaud-Pl´ edran, B.: Quantized vor- tices in an exciton–polariton condensate. Nature Physics4, 706–710 (2008) https:// doi.org/10.1038/nphys1051

    2008 doi

  15. [22]

    Nature Materials 17, 145–151 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/ NMAT5039

    Caputo, D., Ballarini, D., Dagvadorj, G., Mu˜ noz, C.S., Giorgi, M.D., Dominici, L., West, K., Pfeiffer, L.N., Gigli, G., Laussy, F.P., Szymanska, M.H., Sanvitto, D.: Topo- logical order and thermal equilibrium in polariton condensates. Nature Materials 17, 145–151 (2018) http...

    2018

  16. [23]

    Physical Review Letters 100, 250401 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.100.250401

    Keeling, J., Berloff, N.G.: Spontaneous rotat- ing vortex lattices in a pumped decay- ing condensate. Physical Review Letters 100, 250401 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.100.250401

    2008

  17. [24]

    Reports 8 on Progress in Physics80, 016503 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/80/1/ 016503

    Schneider, C., Winkler, K., Fraser, M.D., Kamp, M., Yamamoto, Y., Ostrovskaya, E.A., H¨ ofling, S.: Exciton-polariton trapping and potential landscape engineering. Reports 8 on Progress in Physics80, 016503 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/80/1/ 016503

    2017 doi

  18. [25]

    Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 1516–1519 (2015) https://doi.org/10

    Zhang, L., Xie, W., Wang, J., Poddubny, A., Lu, J., Wang, Y., Gu, J., Liu, W., Xu, D., Shen, X., Rubo, Y.G., Altshuler, B.L., Kavokin, A.V., Chen, Z.: Weak lasing in one-dimensional polariton superlattices. Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 1516–1519 (2015...

    2015

  19. [26]

    Nigro, D., Trypogeorgos, D., Gianfrate, A., Sanvitto, D., Carusotto, I., Gerace, D.: Supersolidity of polariton condensates in pho- tonic crystal waveguides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 056002 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.134.056002

    2025

  20. [27]

    Nature (2025) https://doi.org/10

    Trypogeorgos, D., Gianfrate, A., Landini, M., Nigro, D., Gerace, D., Carusotto, I., Riminucci, F., Baldwin, K.W., Pfeiffer, L.N., Martone, G.I., Giorgi, M.D., Bal- larini, D., Sanvitto, D.: Emerging super- solidity in photonic-crystal polariton con- densates. Nature (2025) htt...

    2025

  21. [28]

    https://arxiv

    Muszynski, M., Kokhanchik, P., Urbonas, D., Kapuscinski, P., Oliwa, P., Mirek, R., Geor- gakilas, I., Stoferle, T., Mahrt, R.F., Forster, M., Scherf, U., Dovzhenko, D., Mazur, R., Morawiak, P., Piecek, W., Kula, P., Pietka, B., Solnyshkov, D., Malpuech, G., Szczytko, J.: Obser...

    2024

  22. [29]

    Physical Review Letters 118, 016602 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.118.016602

    Sun, Y., Wen, P., Yoon, Y., Liu, G., Ste- ger, M., Pfeiffer, L.N., West, K., Snoke, D.W., Nelson, K.A.: Bose-einstein conden- sation of long-lifetime polaritons in ther- mal equilibrium. Physical Review Letters 118, 016602 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.118.016602

    2017

  23. [30]

    Physical Review B88, 041308 (2013) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.041308

    Askitopoulos, A., Ohadi, H., Kavokin, A.V., Hatzopoulos, Z., Savvidis, P.G., Lagoudakis, P.G.: Polariton condensation in an optically induced two-dimensional potential. Physical Review B88, 041308 (2013) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.041308

    2013 doi

  24. [31]

    Physical Review A 99, 033830 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.99.033830

    Nalitov, A.V., Sigurdsson, H., Morina, S., Krivosenko, Y.S., Iorsh, I.V., Rubo, Y.G., Kavokin, A.V., Shelykh, I.A.: Optically trapped polariton condensates as semiclas- sical time crystals. Physical Review A 99, 033830 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.99.033830

    2019

  25. [32]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences111, 8770–8775 (2014) https://doi

    Dreismann, A., Cristofolini, P., Balili, R., Christmann, G., Pinsker, F., Berloff, N.G., Hatzopoulos, Z., Savvidis, P.G., Baumberg, J.J.: Coupled counterrotating polariton con- densates in optically defined annular poten- tials. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences1...

    2014 doi

  26. [33]

    Physical Review B 97, 045303 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.97.045303

    Sun, Y., Yoon, Y., Khan, S., Ge, L., Ste- ger, M., Pfeiffer, L.N., West, K., T¨ ureci, H.E., Snoke, D.W., Nelson, K.A.: Sta- ble switching among high-order modes in polariton condensates. Physical Review B 97, 045303 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.97.045303

    2018

  27. [35]

    Physical Review Letters 99, 140402 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.99.140402

    Wouters, M., Carusotto, I.: Excitations in a nonequilibrium bose-einstein condensate of exciton polaritons. Physical Review Letters 99, 140402 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.99.140402

    2007

  28. [36]

    Physical Review B89, 155302 (2014) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.89.155302

    Haug, H., Doan, T.D., Thoai, D.B.T.: Quan- tum kinetic derivation of the nonequilib- rium gross-pitaevskii equation for nonres- onant excitation of microcavity polaritons. Physical Review B89, 155302 (2014) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.89.155302

    2014 doi

  29. [37]

    Nature Com- munications16, 466 (2025) https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-55119-8

    Voronova, N., Grudinina, A., Panico, R., Trypogeorgos, D., Giorgi, M.D., Baldwin, K., Pfeiffer, L., Sanvitto, D., Ballarini, D.: Exciton-polariton 9 ring josephson junction. Nature Com- munications16, 466 (2025) https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-55119-8

    2025 doi

  30. [38]

    Scientific Reports14(1), 12953 (2024)

    Barrat, J., Cherbunin, R., Sedov, E., Aladin- skaia, E., Liubomirov, A., Litvyak, V., Petrov, M., Zhou, X., Hatzopoulos, Z., Kavokin, A.,et al.: Stochastic circular persis- tent currents of exciton polaritons. Scientific Reports14(1), 12953 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Set of parameters used for superfluid and supersolid solutions. Set of parameters used for superfluid solution: Γ = 0.1 ps −1,α 1 = 12.5µeVµm 2,α= 15.0µeVµm 2, β ℏ = 0.01 ps −1µm2,γ= 0.05 ps −1,w 1 = 14.0µm,w 2 = 1.6µm,m= 2.0·10 −5m0, P0 = 5.25 ps −1µm−2; for supersolid solu- ...

  32. [40]

    The condensate emission directed to the back focal plane of the objective was coupled into a 0.5-m imaging spectrometer (Acton equipped with a PIXIS-256 CCD camera)

    Spectroscopy Path. The condensate emission directed to the back focal plane of the objective was coupled into a 0.5-m imaging spectrometer (Acton equipped with a PIXIS-256 CCD camera). The optical system and pump power were optimized to generate a spectrally pure condensate st...

  33. [41]

    Interferometry Path. The emission routed to the customized Mach-Zehnder interferometer, where the signal arm transmitted the full emission and contained a dual-stage delay line combining precision mechanical translation and piezo actuation for path-length control. The referenc...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.