Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Strongly Coupled Continuous Time Crystal

T0 review · 5 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that continuous time crystals in strongly correlated optical-lattice BECs are holographically dual to oscillating charged AdS black holes, and derives from the duality an experimentally testable critical temperature and…

desk verdict An interesting but unsupported holographic take on continuous time crystals: the key critical-temperature formula is assumed rather than derived, so the paper is a suggestive proposal, not a supported result. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.15295 v2 pith:FDYR65TR submitted 2025-07-21 quant-ph

Ximo Wang , Qiwei Han , Zhenqi Bai , Hongyan Fan , Yichi Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords continuoustimecrystalAdS/CFTdualitychargedblackholequasinormalmodesopticallatticeBECBose-Hubbardmodelspontaneoustime-translationsymmetrybreakingcriticaltemperature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that continuous time crystals, systems that spontaneously oscillate without any periodic driving, can exist in strongly correlated Bose-Hubbard systems in a three-dimensional optical lattice, and that their dynamics are holographically dual to the quasinormal modes of an oscillating charged AdS black hole. The duality yields a synchronization condition $\omega=q\Phi(r_h)$ that fixes the crystal's oscillation frequency from the black-hole horizon potential, plus a critical temperature $T_c \approx 4zJ^2/(k_B U |\psi_0|^2)-q^2N/(4\pi a^3)$ written in experimentally accessible lattice parameters. Near this temperature the paper predicts a universal scaling of the mode lifetime: the imaginary part of the quasinormal frequency vanishes as $(T-T_c)^{1/2}$. A sympathetic reader would care because this converts an abstract symmetry-breaking phase into a concrete prediction for cold-atom experiments, and connects the onset of time-crystalline order to black-hole thermodynamics.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is a holographic dictionary pairing a boundary Bose-Hubbard time crystal with a bulk charged Reissner-Nordström-AdS black hole. The load-bearing identity is the frequency-locking relation $\omega = q\Phi(r_h)$, which states that the spontaneous oscillation frequency on the boundary equals the electric potential at the black-hole horizon times an effective charge $q$; this is what turns a dissipative quasinormal-mode spectrum into a sustained oscillation. On the many-body side the essential object is the second-order cooperative tunneling operator $\hat b_i^{\dagger 2} \hat b_j^2$ with amplitude $K=J^2/U$, obtained through a Schrieffer-Wolff transformation, whose density-oscillation order parameter $\hat O_{\omega_Q}$ has a non-vanishing commutator $\langle[\hat O_\omega(t), \hat O_\omega^\dagger(0)]\rangle = i A e^{-i\omega_n t}$. The quasinormal modes of the black hole supply the dissipative part whose imaginary part vanishes at $T_c$.

What would settle it

Measure the onset of spontaneous number-density oscillations in a three-dimensional optical-lattice BEC with $U/J \gg 1$ as temperature and lattice parameters are varied: if the onset temperature does not follow $T_c \approx 4zJ^2/(k_B U |\psi_0|^2) - q^2N/(4\pi a^3)$, or if the oscillation linewidth does not vanish as $(T-T_c)^{1/2}$, the central claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that spontaneous breaking of continuous time-translation symmetry in a strongly coupled lattice condensate has a gravitational description: the emergent oscillation is a charged scalar field in AdS whose quasinormal modes match the boundary crystal's frequency exactly when $\omega = q\Phi(r_h)$. The cooperative many-body tunneling amplitude $K=J^2/U$ produces a boundary oscillation frequency $\hbar\omega_n = 4zK|\psi_0|^2$, and equating this with the bulk frequency determines when oscillations can be sustained. The transition temperature follows from the black-hole temperature $T = \frac{1}{4\pi}\left(\frac{3r_h}{L^2} - \frac{Q^2}{r_h^3}\right)$ mapped to lattice variables, and the vanishing imaginary part of the quasinormal frequency at $T_c$ yields the universal scaling ${\rm Im}[\omega_{\rm QNM}] \propto -(T-T_c)^{1/2}$. At the same temperature, time-translation symmetry and the $U(1)$ charge symmetry break together, marking a phase that the paper distinguishes from both superfluid and Mott-insulating phases.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the mapping $Q\sim qN$, $r_h\sim aN^{1/3}$, and $L\sim aN^{1/3}$, asserted in the 'Upper temperature limit' section and Supplemental Eqs. (S5)-(S7), which turns black-hole quantities into condensate parameters and from which both the critical temperature and the scaling law follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Continuous time-crystalline order can arise in an undriven strongly correlated lattice BEC in the $U/J \gg 1$ regime via cooperative many-body tunneling.
  • The critical temperature $T_c \approx 4zJ^2/(k_B U |\psi_0|^2) - q^2N/(4\pi a^3)$ gives a direct experimental handle: lattice depth, interaction strength, condensate density, and effective charge can tune the onset of oscillation.
  • At the critical point the oscillation lifetime diverges, because ${\rm Im}[\omega_{\rm QNM}] \to 0$ as $T\to T_c^+$, with the square-root scaling $(T-T_c)^{1/2}$.
  • The phase diagram places the time crystal as a distinct phase between the superfluid and the Mott insulator in the low-temperature, strong-interaction region.
  • The same construction extends to spin chains in optical tweezers via a rotating (Kerr) black-hole counterpart, yielding an analogous critical temperature with spin-exchange coupling $J_{\rm ex}$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mapping $Q\sim qN$, $r_h \sim aN^{1/3}$, $L\sim aN^{1/3}$ is right, the formula implies an upper bound on system size: for fixed $q$ and $a$, increasing $N$ eventually drives the critical temperature negative, so the time crystal disappears; the paper does not spell out this bound.
  • Because $\omega = q\Phi(r_h)$ mirrors the AC Josephson frequency-voltage relation, a plausible extension is that periodic modulation of the effective charge would produce synchronization plateaus in the density oscillations.
  • The $(T-T_c)^{1/2}$ exponent invites a direct measurement of the oscillation linewidth near the transition, which would show whether the universal scaling survives beyond mean-field behaviour.
  • Conversely, a realized lattice time crystal could serve as an analogue device that reads out the horizon potential of its dual black hole, a step the paper leaves implicit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a holographic description of continuous time crystals in strongly correlated bosonic lattice systems. A boundary time-crystal field psi(r,t) = psi(r) e^{-i omega t} is declared dual to a charged scalar oscillating in an RN-AdS black hole background; the black-hole Hawking temperature is identified with the time-crystal critical temperature; a synchronization condition omega = q Phi(r_h) is imposed; and a critical temperature Tc = 4zJ^2/(k_B U |psi_0|^2) - q^2 N/(4 pi a^3) plus a universal scaling Im[omega_QNM] proportional to -(T - Tc)^{1/2} are claimed. The authors also present a mean-field estimate of the pair-tunneling oscillation frequency hbar omega_n = 4zK|psi_0|^2, an order parameter based on a density-oscillation operator, a schematic phase diagram separating superfluid, Mott-insulator, and time-crystalline phases, and, in the Supplemental Material, a Schrieffer-Wolff expansion for the pair-tunneling term and a Kerr-black-hole/spin-chain analogue.

Significance. Should the results hold, the paper would supply a novel unifying framework: a holographic duality for continuous time crystals with a testable critical-temperature formula depending on lattice parameters, and a universal scaling exponent for the onset of spontaneous oscillations. The paper deserves credit for naming an explicit experimental platform (a 3D optical-lattice BEC), for proposing a concrete order parameter in Eq. (11), and for including a standard Schrieffer-Wolff treatment of the pair-tunneling term in the Supplemental Material. However, the central quantitative claims are not supported by the mathematics as written: Eq. (9) does not follow from Eq. (8) under the stated substitution, the main-text and Supplemental parameter mappings are mutually inconsistent, the coefficient in Eq. (14) is unexplained, and the scaling law is asserted without derivation. The paper ships no machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or parameter-free derivation; the only falsifiable prediction (Eq. (9)) is currently an inserted assumption rather than a derived consequence of the duality.

major comments (5)
  1. [Upper temperature limit, Eq. (9)] The claimed derivation of the critical temperature is not performed. Substituting the stated mapping Q ~ qN, r_h ~ aN^{1/3}, L ~ aN^{1/3} into Eq. (8) gives Tc = 3/(4 pi a N^{1/3}) - q^2 N/(4 pi a^3) up to O(1) factors; the first term is O(N^{-1/3}) and contains no J, U, or |psi_0|^2, so it cannot become 4zJ^2/(k_B U |psi_0|^2) under any stated limit of the mapping. The clause 'incorporating the dynamical contribution from many-body cooperative tunneling' introduces a new physical input that is not derived from the gravitational side, so Eq. (9) is an independent assumption grafted onto Eq. (8) rather than a consequence of it.
  2. [Supplemental Sec. 2, Eqs. (S5)-(S8)] The mapping used in the Supplemental Material (mL = alpha sqrt(U/J), r_h = beta alpha (U/J)^{1/3} L, Q = gamma sqrt(hbar U/J)) contradicts the main-text mapping (Q ~ qN, r_h ~ aN^{1/3}, L ~ aN^{1/3}), and substituting it into Eq. (S4) gives k_B Tc = 3 beta alpha (U/J)^{1/3}/(4 pi L) - gamma^2 hbar/(4 pi beta^3 alpha^3 L^3), which has neither the J^2/U nor the |psi_0|^2 dependence of Eq. (9). Moreover, Eq. (S8) rewrites the first term of Eq. (S4) as 3/(L r_h) although Eq. (S4) has 3 r_h/L^2; these differ by a factor (r_h/L)^2. The two parameter mappings are mutually inconsistent, and neither reproduces Eq. (9), so the claim that the dual geometry determines Tc is unsupported.
  3. [Second quantization of time crystal phase, Eqs. (13)-(14)] The result hbar omega_n = 4zK|psi_0|^2 does not follow from Eq. (13). Taking the expectation value of Eq. (13) with <b_i> = psi_0 e^{-i omega_n t} and the decoupling <b_i^dagger b_j^2> ~ |psi_0|^2 psi_0 e^{-i omega_n t} yields hbar omega_n = -zJ - 2zK|psi_0|^2 + U|psi_0|^2, not 4zK|psi_0|^2; the coefficient 4 (versus 2) and the dropped J and U terms are unexplained. Because the first term of Eq. (9) is exactly hbar omega_n/k_B, this undetermined coefficient and the neglected terms propagate directly into the central quantitative prediction.
  4. [Holographic time crystal; 'Within the AdS/CFT duality'] The synchronization condition omega = q Phi(r_h) is imposed rather than derived: no bulk computation, boundary condition, or holographic dictionary produces it, and the claimed universal scaling Im[omega_QNM] proportional to -(T - Tc)^{1/2} is presented without calculation and without reference to the standard soft-mode results that would supply such an exponent. The condition d/d omega Im[omega_bulk]|_{omega=0} = 0 invoked in the paragraph before Eq. (8) is never evaluated, and the Supplemental derives Tc from surface gravity instead, so the main text and the Supplement offer two different and unrelated derivations of the same quantity. The identification of the lattice Bose-Hubbard model with a holographic CFT is likewise asserted without specifying the boundary theory, a large-N limit, or an operator map; the 'duality' is currently an analogy at the level of dimensional analysis.
  5. [Introduction; Supplemental Sec. 4] The statement that the black-hole critical temperature is equivalent to the time-crystal critical temperature is a premise, not a derivation, and the Kerr/spin-chain formula (S23) is asserted without derivation. Combined with the free constants alpha, beta, gamma and the synthetic charge q in the mappings, this makes the advertised prediction for Tc substantially circular: the only non-geometric input in Eq. (9), the term 4zJ^2/(k_B U |psi_0|^2), comes from the lattice model via Eq. (14), while the holographic calculation contributes only the charge-suppression term and no independent constraint on the tunneling scale.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract; Summary and discussion] Typos and wording: 'phase translation' should be 'phase transition', 'emergency of a time-crystalline phase' should read 'emergence', and the phrase '3D optical lattice(ions or tweezer in supplemental materials)' in the abstract is grammatically incomplete.
  2. [Holographic time crystal, text below Eq. (7)] The sentence 'The term mu/r2 encodes the black hole's gravitational influence' describes mu/r in Eq. (7), and 'Phi = Q/(4 pi) * 1/r is the electric field' should read 'electric potential'; the text also refers to 'Eq.5' where Eq. (8) is meant.
  3. [Upper temperature limit / Summary and discussion] The sentence 'We also derived the holographic duality equations for the spin system and determined its critical temperature Tc' is followed by a new section; the promised spin-system derivation is not given in the main text, and the Supplemental Sec. 4 version is a sketch.
  4. [Supplemental Sec. 3] Supplemental Fig. S1 appears to be an unfinished placeholder ('Here is a sketch map: J a a'), and the sentence 'The coefficients need to be normalized under mean field conditions' indicates that the result (S19)-(S21) is not final; both should be completed before submission.
  5. [Figs. 2-4] Figures 2-4 are schematic and not quantitatively tied to Eq. (9): Fig. 4 has no axis ranges or parameter values, the Fig. 2 caption conflates damped ideal oscillations with spontaneous persistent oscillations, and Fig. 3's noise curves lack a description of the noise model.
  6. [References] Reference formatting is broken in places: refs. [40] and [54] contain broken markup ('extbf{125}', '1321'), ref. [45] garbles 'Reissner-Nordstrom', and the block citation [50]-[63] is not tied to specific claims.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The advertised critical-temperature formula is partially circular: its leading term re-inserts the same cooperative-tunneling scale that defines the time crystal, rather than following from the black-hole temperature.

  1. renaming known result [Upper temperature limit, Eq. (9)]
    "Substituting these relations into the black hole temperature formula and incorporating the dynamical contribution from many-body cooperative tunneling, we derive an effective expression for the critical temperature of the time-crystalline phase Tc ≈ 4zJ^2/(k_BU|ψ0|^2) − q^2N/(4πa^3) ... The first term arises from coherent many-body tunneling that drives collective oscillations."

    Direct substitution of the stated dictionary Q∼qN, r_h∼aN^{1/3}, L∼aN^{1/3} into Eq. (8) gives T=(1/4π)(3/(aN^{1/3})−q^2N/a^3), whose geometric term contains no J, U, or |ψ0|^2. The leading term of Eq. (9), 4zJ^2/(k_BU|ψ0|^2), is instead built from the same K=J^2/U and ψ0 that define the many-body cooperative-tunneling mechanism in Eq. (10) and set the oscillation frequency ℏω_n=4zK|ψ0|^2 in Eq. (14). Thus the central quantitative prediction is partially the model's own input relabeled as a holographically derived critical temperature; the black-hole substitution contributes only the charge term.

full rationale

The paper does not rest on a self-citation chain; the few potentially overlapping references, such as [64], are not load-bearing. The core issue is quantitative and partially circular: Eq. (9) does not follow from Eq. (8) under the mapping stated in the text. The leading tunneling term is inserted by hand as the 'dynamical contribution from many-body cooperative tunneling,' which is exactly the scale K=J^2/U already used in the lattice Hamiltonian and in the derivation of the oscillation frequency. Consequently, the advertised prediction of T_c and the universal scaling law that depends on it reduce, at least in their leading term, to the paper's own model inputs rather than to an independent black-hole computation. The synchronization condition ω=qΦ(r_h) is imposed as part of the assumed holographic dictionary rather than derived, but that is a modeling assumption rather than circular reasoning by itself. Overall, the partial circularity in the central prediction warrants a score of 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claims rest on several assumed identifications and parameters (q, α, β, γ) that are not derived from or constrained by the lattice model or experiments.

free parameters (3)
  • synthetic charge q = unspecified
    Appears in the synchronization condition ω=qΦ(r_h) and in the critical temperature; no independent determination is provided.
  • scaling constants α, β, γ = unspecified
    Introduced in Supplemental Eqs. (S5)-(S7) to map scalar mass, horizon radius, and charge to lattice quantities; values are not fixed by theory or data.
  • coefficient 4 in ℏω_n=4zK|ψ0|^2 = 4
    The Heisenberg equation suggests coefficient 2 under simple mean-field decoupling; 4 is asserted without derivation, indicating a hidden factor.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT duality applies to the optical lattice BEC system
    Section 'Holographic time crystal' assumes the lattice system has a gravitational dual without specifying the field theory or the large-N limit.
  • ad hoc to paper The time crystal field is dual to a charged scalar in AdS
    Eq. (1) and the action (2) simply assume the order parameter is a scalar field in the bulk.
  • ad hoc to paper Black hole Hawking temperature equals the critical temperature of the time crystal
    Stated after Eq. (8); no derivation from the boundary theory.
  • ad hoc to paper The mapping Q∼qN, r_h∼aN^{1/3}, L∼aN^{1/3} holds
    Section 'Upper temperature limit' and Supplemental Eq. (S6)-(S7) introduce this mapping without justification.
  • ad hoc to paper Im[ω_QNM] ∝ -(T-Tc)^{1/2} scaling holds
    Stated in 'Holographic time crystal' section; no derivation or citation.
invented entities (2)
  • synthetic charge q
    purpose: Couples the time crystal to the black hole electric potential; sets the oscillation frequency via ω=qΦ
    No experimental handle is given; q is an unconstrained parameter.
  • Kerr black hole dual for spin chain
    purpose: Provides a holographic dual for the spin-chain time crystal
    Added in supplemental materials without derivation; no observable prediction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Strongly Coupled Continuous Time Crystal." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FDYR65TR

@misc{pith2026250715295,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Strongly Coupled Continuous Time Crystal},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FDYR65TR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.15295}
}
read the original abstract

Time crystals are classified into discrete time crystals and continuous time crystals based on whether they spontaneously break time-translation symmetry. Continuous-time crystals do not require external driving. By introducing AdS/CFT duality to time crystals, we derive their thermodynamic limit and find that in strongly correlated many-body systems such as a 3D optical lattice(ions or tweezer in supplemental materials), cooperative many-body tunneling enables time crystals to oscillate spontaneously. In strongly correlated quantum systems driven by many-body cooperative tunneling, we discover a universal scaling law governing the time-crystalline phase transition at a critical temperature.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.15295 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: (a) Shows the experimental system of charged [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: (a) Time Crystal Density Oscillations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4: The phase diagram reflects the evolution of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Anomalous resonance in Weyl semimetals: A holographic study of non-linear effects

    hep-th 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fully back-reacted holographic simulations show nonlinear corrections to anomalously long-lived current oscillations are tiny, so decay rates can be made arbitrarily small at low temperature.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Quantum Time Crystals,

    F. Wilczek, “Quantum Time Crystals,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 160401 (2012), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.160401

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.160401 2012

  2. [2]

    Superfluidity and Space-Time Translation Symmetry Breaking,

    F. Wilczek, “Superfluidity and Space-Time Translation Symmetry Breaking,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 250402 (2013), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.250402

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.250402 2013

  3. [3]

    Colloquium: Quantum and clas- sical discrete time crystals,

    M. P. Zaletel, M. Lukin, C. Monroe, C. Nayak, F. Wilczek and N. Y. Yao, “Colloquium: Quantum and clas- sical discrete time crystals,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 031001 (2023), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.95.031001

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.95.031001 2023

  4. [4]

    Discrete Time Crystals,

    D. V. Else, C. Monroe, C. Nayak and N. Y. Yao, “Discrete Time Crystals,” Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter 5 Phys. 11, 467 (2020), doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys- 031119-050658

    doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys- 2020

  5. [5]

    Space-time crystals of trapped ions,

    T. Li, Z.-X. Gong, Z.-Q. Yin, H. T. Quan, X.-B. Yin, P. Zhang, L.-M. Duan and X. Zhang, “Space-time crystals of trapped ions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 163001 (2012), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.163001

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.163001 2012

  6. [6]

    Discrete Time Crystals: Rigidity, Criticality, and Realizations,

    N. Y. Yao, A. C. Potter, I.-D. Potirniche and A. Vish- wanath, “Discrete Time Crystals: Rigidity, Criticality, and Realizations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 030401 (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.030401

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.030401 2017

  7. [7]

    Critical Time Crystals in Dipolar Sys- tems,

    W.-W. Ho, S. Choi, M. D. Lukin and D. A. Abanin, “Critical Time Crystals in Dipolar Sys- tems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 010602 (2017), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.010602

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.010602 2017

  8. [8]

    Observation of Discrete-Time-Crystal Signatures in an Ordered Dipo- lar Many-Body System,

    J. Rovny, R. L. Blum, and S. E. Barrett, “Observation of Discrete-Time-Crystal Signatures in an Ordered Dipo- lar Many-Body System,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 180603 (2018), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.180603

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.180603 2018

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    Discrete Time Crystal Enabled by Stark Many-Body Localization,

    S. Liu, S.-X. Zhang, C. Y. Hsieh, S. Zhang and H. Yao, “Discrete Time Crystal Enabled by Stark Many-Body Localization,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 120403 (2023), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.120403

    2023 doi

  2. [10]

    Flo- quet Phases of Matter via Classical Prethermaliza- tion,

    B.-T. Ye, F. Machado and N. Y. Yao, “Flo- quet Phases of Matter via Classical Prethermaliza- tion,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 140603 (2021), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.140603

    2021 doi

  3. [11]

    Absolutely Stable Time Crystals at Finite Tem- perature,

    F. Machado, Q.-T. Zhuang, N. Y. Yao, and M. P. Za- lete, “Absolutely Stable Time Crystals at Finite Tem- perature,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 180402 (2023), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.180402

    2023 doi

  4. [12]

    Floquet Flux Attachment in Cold Atomic Systems,

    H. Kamal, J. Kemp, Y.-C. He, Y. Fuji, M. Aidelsburger, P. Zoller and N. Y. Yao, “Floquet Flux Attachment in Cold Atomic Systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 163403 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.163403

    2024 doi

  5. [13]

    Experimental Re- alization of Discrete Time Quasicrystals,

    G.-H. He, B.-T. Ye, R.-T. Gong, C.-Y. Yao, Z.-Y. Liu, K. W. Murch, N. Y. Yao and C. Zu, “Experimental Re- alization of Discrete Time Quasicrystals,” Phys. Rev. X 15, 011055 (2025), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.15.011055

    2025 doi

  6. [14]

    Clas- sical discrete time crystals,

    N. Y. Yao, C. Nayak, L. Balents and M. P. Zaletel, “Clas- sical discrete time crystals,” Nat. Phys. 16, 438 (2020), doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0782-3

    2020 doi

  7. [15]

    Observation of a discrete time crystal,

    J. Zhang, P. W. Hess, A. Kyprianidis, P. Becker, A. Lee, J. Smith, G. Pagano, I.-D. Potirniche, A. C. Potter, A. Vishwanath, N. Y. Yao and C. Monroe, “Observation of a discrete time crystal,” Nature 543, 217 (2017), doi: 10.1038/nature21413

    2017 doi

  8. [16]

    Observation of a prethermal discrete time crystal,

    A. Kyprianidis, F. Machado, W. Morong, P. Becker, K. S. Collins, D. V. Else, L. Feng, P. W. Hess, C. Nayak, G. Pagano, N. Y. Yao and C. Monroe, “Observation of a prethermal discrete time crystal,” Science 372, 1192 (2021), doi:10.1126/science.abg8102

    2021 doi

  9. [17]

    Higher-order and fractional discrete time crystals in Floquet-driven Rydberg atoms,

    B. Liu, L.-H. Zhang, Q.-F. Wang, Y. Ma, T.-Y. Han, J. Zhang, Z.-Y. Zhang, S.-Y. Shao, Q. Li, H.-C. Chen, B.-S. Shi and D.-S. Ding, “Higher-order and fractional discrete time crystals in Floquet-driven Rydberg atoms,” Nat. Commun. 15, 9730 (2024), doi:10.1038/s41467-024- 53712-5

    2024 doi

  10. [18]

    Observation of a Space-Time Crystal in a Superfluid Quantum Gas,

    J. Smits, L. Liao, H. T. C. Stoof and P. van der Straten, “Observation of a Space-Time Crystal in a Superfluid Quantum Gas,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 185301 (2018), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.185301

    2018 doi

  11. [19]

    Dynamical Transitions and Critical Behavior between Discrete Time Crystal Phases,

    X.Q. Yang and Z. Cai, “Dynamical Transitions and Critical Behavior between Discrete Time Crystal Phases,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 020602 (2021), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.020602

    2021 doi

  12. [20]

    Symmetries and correlations in continu- ous time crystals,

    A. Mukherjee, Y. Ibrahim, M. Hajduˇ sek and S. Vin- janampathy, “Symmetries and correlations in continu- ous time crystals,” Phys. Rev. A 110, 012220 (2024), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.110.012220

    2024 doi

  13. [21]

    Exotic Synchronization in Con- tinuous Time Crystals Outside the Symmetric Sub- space,

    P. Solanki, M. Krishna, M. Hajduˇ sek, C. Bruder and S. Vinjanampathy, “Exotic Synchronization in Con- tinuous Time Crystals Outside the Symmetric Sub- space,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 260403 (2024), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.260403

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    Quantum Dissipative Contin- uous Time Crystals,

    F. Russo and T.s Pohl, “Quantum Dissipative Contin- uous Time Crystals,” Arxiv 2503, 16141 (2025), doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.16141

    2025 doi arXiv

  15. [23]

    Observation of a con- tinuous time crystal,

    P. Kongkhambut, J. Skulte, L. Mathey, J. G. Cosme, A. Hemmerich and H. Keßle, “Observation of a con- tinuous time crystal,” Science 377, 670 (2022), doi: 10.1126/science.abo3382

    2022 doi

  16. [24]

    Time crystals in a shaken atom-cavity system,

    J. G. Cosme, J. Skulte and L. Mathey, “Time crystals in a shaken atom-cavity system,” Phys. Rev. A 100, 053615 (2019), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.100.053615

    2019 doi

  17. [25]

    Dissipative time crystal in a strongly interacting Rydberg gas,

    X.-L. Wu, Z.-Q. Wang, F. Yang, R.-C. Gao, C. Liang, M. K. Tey, X.-l. Li, T. Pohl and L. You, “Dissipative time crystal in a strongly interacting Rydberg gas,” Nat. Phys. 20, 1389 (2024), doi:10.1038/s41567-024-02542-9

    2024 doi

  18. [26]

    Robust continu- ous time crystal in an electron–nuclear spin system,

    A. Greilich, N. E. Kopteva, A. N. Kamenskii, P. S. Sokolov, V. L. Korenev and M. Bayer, “Robust continu- ous time crystal in an electron–nuclear spin system,” Nat. Phys. 20, 631 (2024), doi:10.1038/s41567-023-02351-6

    2024 doi

  19. [27]

    Measurement-Induced Continuous Time Crystals,

    M. Krishna, P. Solanki, M. Hajduˇ se and Sai Vin- janampathy, “Measurement-Induced Continuous Time Crystals,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 150401 (2023), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.150401

    2023 doi

  20. [28]

    Photonic metamaterial analogue of a continuous time crystal,

    T.-J. Liu, J.-Y. Ou, K. F. MacDonald and N. I. Zheludev, “Photonic metamaterial analogue of a continuous time crystal,” Nat. Phys. 19, 986 (2023), doi:10.1038/s41567- 023-02023-5

    2023 doi

  21. [29]

    Continuous sensing and parameter estimation with the boundary time-crystal,

    A. Cabot, F. Carollo and I. Lesanovsky, “Continuous sensing and parameter estimation with the boundary time-crystal,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 050801 (2024), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.050801

    2024 doi

  22. [30]

    AdS/CFT Duality and Holographic Renor- malization Group: A Review,

    H. Huang, “AdS/CFT Duality and Holographic Renor- malization Group: A Review,” Arxiv 2412, 05446 (2024), doi:10.48550/arXiv.2412.05446

    2024 doi arXiv

  23. [31]

    Holographic duality with a view toward many-body physics,

    J. McGreevy, “Holographic duality with a view toward many-body physics,” Adv. High Energy Phys. 2010, 723105 (2010), doi:10.1155/2010/723105

    2010 doi

  24. [32]

    Supersymmetric Gauge Theories and the AdS/CFT Correspondence,

    E. D’Hokera and D. Z. Freedman, “Supersymmetric Gauge Theories and the AdS/CFT Correspondence,” World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc. , 0201253 (2004), 10.1142/9789812702821_0001

    2004 doi

  25. [33]

    Correlation functions in the CFT d/AdSd+1 correspondence,

    D. Z. Freedman, S. D. Mathur, A. Matusis and L. Rastelli, “Correlation functions in the CFT d/AdSd+1 correspondence,” Nucl. Phys. B 546, 96 (1999), doi: 10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00053-X

    1999 doi

  26. [34]

    TASI Lectures on AdS/CFT,

    J. Penedones, “TASI Lectures on AdS/CFT,” Theoret- ical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: New Frontiers in Fields and Strings, 75 (2017), 10.1142/9789813149441_0002

    2017 doi

  27. [35]

    Emergent Sasaki-Einstein geometry and AdS/CFT,

    R. J. Berman, T. C. Collins and D. Persson, “Emergent Sasaki-Einstein geometry and AdS/CFT,” Nat. Com- mun. 13, 365 (2022), doi:10.1142/10270

    2022 doi

  28. [36]

    New gedanken experiment on higher-dimensional asymptoticallyAdS Reiss- ner–Nordstr¨ om black hole,

    M. Zhang, J. Jiang, “New gedanken experiment on higher-dimensional asymptoticallyAdS Reiss- ner–Nordstr¨ om black hole,” Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 890 (2020), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08475-w

    2020 doi

  29. [37]

    Joule-Thomson expansion for quantum cor- rected AdS-Reissner-Nordstrom black holes in Kiselev spacetime,

    J. P. Morais Graca, E. F. Capossoli, H. B. Filho and I. 6 P. Lobo, “Joule-Thomson expansion for quantum cor- rected AdS-Reissner-Nordstrom black holes in Kiselev spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D. 107, 024045 (2023), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.024045

    2023 doi

  30. [38]

    Quasinormal-mode expansion for waves in open sys- tems,

    E. S. C. Ching, P. T. Leung, A. Maassen van den Brink, W. M. Suen, S. S. Tong and K. Young, “Quasinormal-mode expansion for waves in open sys- tems,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 1545 (1998), doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.70.1545

    1998 doi

  31. [39]

    Black hole spectroscopy with nonlinear quasinormal modes,

    M. Lagos, T. Andrade, J. R. Ventosa and L. Hu, “Black hole spectroscopy with nonlinear quasinormal modes,” Phys. Rev. D 111, 024018 (2025), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.024018

    2025 doi

  32. [40]

    Shape Deformation of Nanoresonator: A Quasinormal-Mode Perturbation The- ory,

    W. Yan, P. Lalanne and . Qiu, “Shape Deformation of Nanoresonator: A Quasinormal-Mode Perturbation The- ory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. extbf125, 013901 (2020), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.013901

    2020 doi

  33. [41]

    Resonant Excitation of Quasinormal Modes of Black Holes,

    H. Motohashi, “Resonant Excitation of Quasinormal Modes of Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 141401 (2025), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.141401

    2025 doi

  34. [42]

    Roating Charged Black Hole Solution in Het- erotic String Theory,

    A. Sen, “Roating Charged Black Hole Solution in Het- erotic String Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1006 (1992), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.1006

    1992 doi

  35. [43]

    Circular motion of charged particles near a charged black hole,

    Y.-Q. Lei and X.-H. Ge, “Circular motion of charged particles near a charged black hole,” Phys. Rev. D 105, 084011 (2022), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.084011

    2022 doi

  36. [44]

    Black to white transition of a charged black hole,

    A. R. Bret and C. Rovelli, “Black to white transition of a charged black hole,” Phys. Rev. D 105, 086003 (2022), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.086003

    2022 doi

  37. [45]

    Thermodynamics and Van der Waals phase transition of charged black holes in flat spacetime via Re /acute.ts1nyi statistics,

    C. Promsiri , E. Hirunsirisawat and W. Liewrian, “Thermodynamics and Van der Waals phase transition of charged black holes in flat spacetime via Re /acute.ts1nyi statistics,” Phys. Rev. D 102, 064014 (2020), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.064014

    2020 doi

  38. [46]

    Motion of charged particles in spacetimes with magnetic fields of spherical and hyperbolic sym- metry,

    Y. Lim, “Motion of charged particles in spacetimes with magnetic fields of spherical and hyperbolic sym- metry,” Phys. Rev. D 106, 064023 (2022), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.106.064023

    2022 doi

  39. [47]

    Superfluid-Insulator Transi- tion of Strongly Interacting Fermi Gases in Optical Lattices,

    H. Zhai and T.-L. Ho, “Superfluid-Insulator Transi- tion of Strongly Interacting Fermi Gases in Optical Lattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 100402 (2007), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.100402

    2007 doi

  40. [48]

    Vor- tex Lattices in the Bose-Fermi Superfluid Mix- ture,

    Y.-Z. Jiang, R. Qi, Z.-Y. Shi and H. Zhai, “Vor- tex Lattices in the Bose-Fermi Superfluid Mix- ture,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 080403 (2017), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.080403

    2017 doi

  41. [49]

    Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a Mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms,

    M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T. W. H¨ ansch and I. Bloch, “Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a Mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms,” Nature 415, 39 (2002), doi:0.1038/415039a

    2002

  42. [50]

    Softening of Roton and Phonon Modes in a Bose-Einstein Condensate with Spin-Orbit Coupling,

    S.-C. Ji, L. Zhang, X.-T. Xu, Z. Wu, Y.-J. Deng, S. Chen, and J.-W. Pan, “Softening of Roton and Phonon Modes in a Bose-Einstein Condensate with Spin-Orbit Coupling,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 105301 (2015), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.105301

    2015 doi

  43. [51]

    Coherent driving and freezing of bosonic matter wave in an optical Lieb lattice,

    S. Taie, H. Ozawa, T. Ichinose, T. Nishio, S. Nakajima and Y. Takahashi, “Coherent driving and freezing of bosonic matter wave in an optical Lieb lattice,” Sci. Adv. 1, 1 (2015), doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500854

    2015 doi

  44. [52]

    Site-Resolved Imaging of Ultracold Fermions in a Triangular-Lattice Quantum Gas Microscope,

    J. Yang, L.-Y. Liu, J. Mongkolkiattichai and P. Schauss, “Site-Resolved Imaging of Ultracold Fermions in a Triangular-Lattice Quantum Gas Microscope,” PRX Quantum 2, 020344 (2021), doi: 10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.020344

    2021 doi

  45. [53]

    Observation of Brane Parity Or- der in Programmable Optical Lattices,

    D. Wei, D. Adler, K. Srakaew, S. Agrawal, P. Weckesser, I. Bloch and J. Zeiher, “Observation of Brane Parity Or- der in Programmable Optical Lattices,” Phys. Rev. X 13, 021042 (2023), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.13.021042

    2023 doi

  46. [54]

    Long-Lived Coher- ence on a µ Hz Scale Optical Magnetic Quadrupole Tran- sition,

    V. Kl¨ usener, S. Pucher, D. Yankelev, J. Trautmann, F. Spriestersbach, D. Filin, S. G. Porsev, M. S. Safronova, I. Bloch and S. Blat, “Long-Lived Coher- ence on a µ Hz Scale Optical Magnetic Quadrupole Tran- sition,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 1321, 253201 (2024), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevL...

    2024 doi

  47. [55]

    Laser spectroscopic probing of coexisting superfluid and insulating states of an atomic Bose–Hubbard system,

    S. Kato, K. Inaba, S. Sugawa, K. Shibata, R. Yamamoto, M. Yamashita and Y. Takahashi, “Laser spectroscopic probing of coexisting superfluid and insulating states of an atomic Bose–Hubbard system,” Nat. Commun. 7, 11341 (2016), doi:: 10.1038/ncomms11341

    2016 doi

  48. [56]

    Realization of the Hof- stadter Hamiltonian with ultracold atoms in optical lattices,

    M. Aidelsburger, M. Atala, M. Lohse, J. T. Barreiro, B. Paredes, and I. Bloch, “Realization of the Hof- stadter Hamiltonian with ultracold atoms in optical lattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 185301 (2013), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.185301

    2013 doi

  49. [57]

    Analyzing Nonequi- librium Quantum States through Snapshots with Arti- ficial Neural Networks,

    A. Bohrdt, S. Kim, A. Lukin, M. Rispoli, R. Schittko, M. Knap, M. Greiner and J. Leonard, “Analyzing Nonequi- librium Quantum States through Snapshots with Arti- ficial Neural Networks,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 150504 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.150504

    2021 doi

  50. [58]

    Realization of one-dimensional anyons with arbitrary statistical phase,

    J. Kwan, P. Segura, Y.-F. Li, S. Kim, A. V. Gorshkov, A. Eckardt, B. B. Hassani and M. Greiner, “Realization of one-dimensional anyons with arbitrary statistical phase, ” Science 386, 1055 (2024), doi:10.1126/science.adi3252

    2024 doi

  51. [59]

    Collective Dipole Os- cillation of a Spin-Orbit Coupled Bose-Einstein Con- densate,

    J.-Y. Zhang, S.-C. Ji, Z. Chen, L. Zhang, Z.-D. Du, B. Yan, G.-S. Pan, B. Zhao, Y.-J. Deng, H. Zhai, S. Chen and J.-W. Pan, “Collective Dipole Os- cillation of a Spin-Orbit Coupled Bose-Einstein Con- densate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 115301 (2012), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.115301

    2012 doi

  52. [60]

    Realization of two-dimensional spin-orbit coupling for Bose-Einstein condensates,

    Z. Wu, L. Zhang, W. Sun, X.-T. Xu, B.-Z. Wang, S.- C.g Ji, Y.J. Deng, S. Chen, X.-J. Liu and J.-W. Pan, “Realization of two-dimensional spin-orbit coupling for Bose-Einstein condensates,” Science 354, 83 (2016), doi: 10.1126/science.aaf6689

    2016 doi

  53. [61]

    Temperature- Dependent Decay of Quasi-Two-Dimensional Vortices across the BCS-BEC Crossover,

    X.-P. Liu, X.-C. Yao, X.-P. Li, Y.-X. Wang, C.-J. Huang, Y.-I. Deng, Y.-A. Chen and J.-W. Pan, “Temperature- Dependent Decay of Quasi-Two-Dimensional Vortices across the BCS-BEC Crossover,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 163602 (2022), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.163602

    2022 doi

  54. [62]

    Spin-Orbit Coupled Spinor Bose-Einstein Conden- sates,

    C.-J. Wang, C. Gao, C.-M. Jian and H. Zha, “Spin-Orbit Coupled Spinor Bose-Einstein Conden- sates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 160403 (2010), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.160403

    2010 doi

  55. [63]

    Attosecond Control of Restora- tion of Electronic Structure Symmetry,

    H. Shi and S.-W. Zhang, “Attosecond Control of Restora- tion of Electronic Structure Symmetry,” Phys. Rev. E 93, 033303 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.93.033303

    2016 doi

  56. [64]

    Ultrafast Creation of Overlapping Rydberg Electrons in an Atomic BEC and Mott-Insulator Lattice,

    M. Mizoguchi, Y. Zhang, M. Kunimi, A. Tanaka, S. Takeda, N. Takei, V. Bharti, K. Koyasu, T. Kishimoto, D. Jaksch, A. Glaetzle, M. Kiffner, G. Masell, G. Pupillo, M. Weidem¨ uller and K. Ohmori, “Ultrafast Creation of Overlapping Rydberg Electrons in an Atomic BEC and Mott-Insul...

    2020 doi

  57. [65]

    The thermodynamic limit of the black hole is equivalent to the temperature of the time crys tal on the CFT boundary

    LIMIT TEMPERATURE Tc OF TIME CR YSTAL The time crystal phase corresponds to a conformal field on the bo undary of a CFT, where its spontaneous symmetry breaking of time translation is dual to an oscillating charged black hole solution in AdS space. The thermodynamic limit of th...

  58. [66]

    (S5) • Horizon radius scaling rh ≈β(mL3)1/ 3 =βα ( U J ) 1/ 3 L

    SCALING LA W DERIV ATION • Scalar mass to interaction mL =α √ U J. (S5) • Horizon radius scaling rh ≈β(mL3)1/ 3 =βα ( U J ) 1/ 3 L. (S6) • Charge to chemical potential Q =γ √ ℏU J . (S7) The correspondence Q = γ √ ℏ U J arises from dimensional analysis and scaling arguments in...

  59. [67]

    Perturbation ˆHt = −J ∑ ⟨i,j ⟩ (ˆb† i ˆbj + h.c.), (S10) (Single-particle tunneling, energy scale J ≪ U )

    PER TURBATION EXP ANDING OF MANY-BODY COOPERATIVE TUNNEL ING The original Hamiltonian ˆH = ˆH0 + ˆHt, (S9) where Unperturbed part is ˆH0 = U 2 ∑ i ˆni(ˆni − 1) (On-site repulsion, dominant energy scale U ). Perturbation ˆHt = −J ∑ ⟨i,j ⟩ (ˆb† i ˆbj + h.c.), (S10) (Single-parti...

  60. [68]

    4 In rotating black holes, the frame-dragging effect of Kerr black ho les can also counteract gravitational redshift, with the action corresponding to spin-curvature coupling

    TIME CR YSTAL CORRESPONDED TO KERR BLACK HOLE In the many-body system corresponding to spin chain, we still find a correspondence with Kerr black holes in AdS. 4 In rotating black holes, the frame-dragging effect of Kerr black ho les can also counteract gravitational redshift, w...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.