Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Regge Trajectories of N=4 SYM Part I: General Asymptotic Baxter-Bethe Ansatz

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper derives the Asymptotic Baxter-Bethe Ansatz, a set of Quantum-Spectral-Curve-based equations that determine the multi-loop spectrum of Regge trajectories in the BFKL regime of planar N=4 super-Yang-Mills, including massless…

desk verdict A genuinely new analytic framework for the BFKL regime of N=4 SYM, derived from the QSC and backed by real checks; the load-bearing approximation in (B.1) is numerically verified but unproven, so it deserves a serious referee rather than acceptance on faith. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.15983 v1 pith:4Y3FTF7T submitted 2025-07-21 hep-th

Simon Ekhammar , Nikolay Gromov , Michelangelo Preti This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords ReggetrajectoriesBFKLregimeN=4superYang-MillsQuantumSpectralCurveBaxter-Betheansatzmasslessmodesstrong-couplinginterceptplanarintegrability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to show that Regge trajectories in the BFKL regime of planar $\mathcal{N}=4$ super-Yang-Mills theory can be described, up to wrapping corrections, by a new set of equations called the Asymptotic Baxter-Bethe Ansatz (ABBA). ABBA is derived from the exact Quantum Spectral Curve and trades the full non-perturbative spectral problem for algebraic Bethe equations together with two functional Baxter equations, so that multi-loop weak-coupling data and a systematic classification of trajectories become accessible. If the construction is right, it explains the odd powers of the coupling observed earlier as massless modes, reproduces the known Pomeron eigenvalue, and supplies starting points for numerical studies that reach the strong-coupling regime, where a simple universal intercept formula emerges.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Asymptotic Baxter-Bethe Ansatz of equation (3.1): a coupled system that combines Bethe equations for massive and auxiliary roots, a massless Bethe equation for the $z_j$, and finite-difference Baxter equations for the non-compact functions $Q_2$ and $Q_6$. The key identity behind its derivation is the single-term dominance $\mu_{ab}\simeq Q^-_{ab|13}\omega_{13}$ in the P-mu system, which makes the ratio $F=\mu_{12}/\mu^{[2]}_{12}$ a rational function of the Zhukovsky variable and lets the roots and dressing phases be read off directly. This machinery converts the QSC's infinite ladder of cuts into a finite set of algebraic equations that remain valid up to wrapping order.

What would settle it

Use the numerical QSC to compute one horizontal trajectory at a coupling where ABBA predicts a specific coefficient at order $g^{L_{\mathrm{eff}}+2}$ and compare: ABBA should fail only at that wrapping order. A mismatch appearing one order earlier, or a direct numerical check of the ratio $F=\mu_{12}/\mu^{[2]}_{12}$ that finds extra non-rational cut contributions before that order, would falsify the single-term dominance assumption.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that the asymptotic spectrum of horizontal Regge trajectories is encoded in ABBA, whose momentum-carrying roots consist of $K_4$ massive Bethe roots $u_{4,k}$ and $N$ massless roots $z_j$, with $N=4$ for horizontal trajectories and $N=2$ for reflection areas. The auxiliary nodes 1, 3, 5 and 7 are ordinary Bethe roots, while nodes 2 and 6 are non-compact: they are meromorphic functions $Q_2$ and $Q_6$ fixed by Baxter equations with prescribed poles and power-like asymptotics that carry the dependence on $\Delta$ and $S_2$. Solving ABBA gives the anomalous spin $\gamma_S$ as a sum of massive and massless contributions, producing, for example, $\gamma_S=4g^2\chi(\Delta,S_2)+O(g^4)$ in the $L=2$ minimal sector, and a numerically conjectured strong-coupling intercept formula $S_1(0)=-\delta+(\delta(\delta+2)-L^2)/(2\sqrt{\lambda})+O(1/\lambda)$.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes that a single term, $\mu_{ab}\simeq Q^-_{ab|13}\omega_{13}$, dominates the P-mu monodromy and that horizontal trajectories have exactly four massless roots while reflection areas have two; if either of these fails at non-wrapping orders, the ABBA equations would need extra corrections.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • ABBA provides weak-coupling predictions for $\gamma_S$ up to wrapping order, with the number of accessible orders growing with the quantum numbers; in the minimal sector this covers all 165 states at $L=10$.
  • The minimal sector reproduces the Pomeron eigenvalue $4g^2\chi(\Delta,S_2)$ for $L=2$ and gives the full state count $(L-1)L(L+1)/6$, of which $\lfloor L^2/4\rfloor$ are parity symmetric.
  • The odd powers of $g$ seen earlier in Regge data are attributed to massless modes, whose contribution to $\gamma_S$ is linear in $g$ whenever nonzero massless roots are present.
  • For the subleading HT2 trajectories, ABBA finds all 6 states for $L=2$ and all 30 states for $L=4$, and numerical evidence indicates that the wrapping order is set by an effective length $L_{\mathrm{eff}}$ rather than by $L$ alone.
  • At strong coupling, every numerically computed intercept fits $S_1(0)=-\delta+(\delta(\delta+2)-L^2)/(2\sqrt{\lambda})+O(1/\lambda)$, extending the known leading Pomeron intercept to all resolved horizontal trajectories and reflection areas.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the maximal-transcendentality dictionary transfers to QCD, the massless-mode mechanism predicts fractional powers of $\alpha_s$ in QCD BFKL observables wherever the $\mathcal{N}=4$ formula has odd powers of $g$; the gluon-dominated leading terms would be the cleanest place to test this.
  • Editorial inference: the strong-coupling intercept formula reads like a Casimir-type shift, so it invites a string-theory derivation in which the level structure is organized by $\delta(\delta+2)-L^2$; one could look for the corresponding oscillator-like operator on the AdS side.
  • Editorial inference: the finite-coupling collisions of intercepts suggest that analytically continuing ABBA solutions through the collision point could give a direct description of the complex-spectrum region, similar to level-crossing phenomena in non-Hermitian integrable models.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces the Asymptotic Baxter-Bethe Ansatz (ABBA), a set of functional and Bethe-type equations (Eq. (3.1)) that is claimed to determine the asymptotic spectrum of Regge trajectories in the BFKL regime of planar N=4 SYM. The ABBA is derived from the Quantum Spectral Curve in Appendix B, under the single-term dominance approximation of Eq. (B.1), and is applied to the minimal sector HT0 (Section 5) and to subleading horizontal trajectories HT2 with massive roots (Section 6). The paper reports multi-loop weak-coupling results up to the claimed wrapping order, reproduces the known Pomeron eigenvalue 4 g^2 chi for L=2 (Eq. (5.20)), explains odd powers of g through massless modes, and proposes a numerically deduced universal strong-coupling intercept formula (Eq. (7.3)). Two companion notebooks are provided for solving the ABBA equations.

Significance. If the central approximation holds, ABBA gives a genuinely new analytic handle on a regime that previously required case-by-case numerical QSC studies, and it provides a classification scheme for trajectories. The paper contains several independent and meaningful checks: the L=2 minimal sector reproduces the Kotikov-Lipatov result, the odd-g terms match the earlier calculation of Ref. [22], and Figures 4-8 demonstrate good agreement between ABBA and numerical QSC away from branching regions. The attached notebooks make the perturbative solution reproducible. However, the main derivation relies on the numerically verified but unproved approximation (B.1), and the claimed wrapping-order accuracy inherits the uncertainties of that approximation. The result is therefore a strong conditional advance rather than a fully closed proof.

major comments (4)
  1. [Appendix B, Eq. (B.1)] The derivation of the ABBA rests on the single-term dominance approximation mu_ab ≈ Q^-_{ab|13} omega_13, with all other terms in the Pmu-system discarded as higher-order wrapping corrections. The paper states that this was 'extensively verified' numerically, but it does not provide an analytic estimate or a rigorous bound on the discarded terms. Since the claimed wrapping order (g^{L+2}, stated in Sections 5.3 and 7.1) is precisely the order at which the neglected terms could enter, the multi-loop tables in Sections 5-7 inherit an unproved uniformity assumption. Please provide an analytic estimate of the discarded contributions in the massless-root region, or explicitly reformulate the results as conditional on this approximation.
  2. [Appendix B.6] The derivation of the massless Bethe equation involves deforming integration contours and dropping contributions under the statement 'for sufficiently large L' (around Eqs. (B.74)-(B.75)), but the resulting equations are then applied at L=2,3,4 (Tables 1, 4, 5). The threshold for 'sufficiently large' is not quantified, and the paper does not explain why the same residue extraction is valid at such small values of L. Please provide a quantitative bound on the omitted contour contributions at finite L, or present additional numerical evidence specifically addressing the small-L validity of this step.
  3. [Section 7.3, Eq. (7.3)] The universal strong-coupling intercept formula S1(0) = -delta + (delta(delta+2)-L^2)/(2 sqrt(lambda)) + O(1/lambda) is presented as a numerical fit ('deduced numerically ... promote it to the exact formula') without a derivation or a detailed error analysis. Since this formula is one of the headline results, the fitting procedure should be made explicit: the number of data points, the fitting range in lambda, the estimated uncertainties of the coefficients, and the criterion for identifying the integers delta. Without these details, the reader cannot assess the claimed confidence in this conjecture.
  4. [Section 3 and Appendix B, Eqs. (B.19)-(B.21)] The number of massless modes N=4 for horizontal trajectories and N=2 for reflection areas is an input to the ABBA, fixed by the observed exponential growth of the gluing matrix. The paper explicitly says 'we have so far found' these values, which makes the completeness of the classification claimed in the abstract contingent on a numerical observation. Please state clearly that the classification is conditional on the absence of additional massless-mode sectors, and discuss what evidence or constraints would rule out N>4.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3, Eq. (3.14)] The sentence following Eq. (3.14) says 'the first term gives a regular expansion in g^2'; 'regular' should be replaced by 'an expansion in even powers of g' to avoid confusion with analyticity.
  2. [Section 7.1, Eq. (7.2)] In Eq. (7.2), the term '96Clog 2' should read '96 C log 2' (Catalan's constant times log 2); the missing multiplication is likely a typesetting issue.
  3. [Table 1] The table caption states 'We have used short-hand notation χ=χ(∆,S_2))'; the extra closing parenthesis should be removed.
  4. [Section 3, paragraph after Eq. (3.1)] The phrase 'the ABBA contain K4 massive momentum-carrying Bethe roots' should be 'the ABBA contains' to match the singular subject.
  5. [Section 3.1, Eq. (3.20)] The text says 'The above equations give precisely K1+K3 additional conditions', but Eq. (3.20) is evaluated at both u_{1,k} and u_{3,k}; the counting should be stated more explicitly to avoid apparent double counting of the conditions at the two sets of roots.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the ABBA weak-coupling spectrum is derived from the QSC under explicitly stated assumptions, with independent checks; the strong-coupling intercept formula is openly labelled as a numerical fit.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and not circular. Appendix B starts from the QSC Pmu-system and makes one explicitly stated asymptotic assumption, the single-term dominance mu_ab approximately Q^-_{ab|13} omega_{13} (B.1), which is numerically verified but not proven; this is a stated premise, not an equivalent restatement of the target spectrum. From this premise the ABBA equations (3.1)/(3.21) are obtained by systematic analyticity, Wronskian and residue arguments, and the minimal-sector solution is then solved explicitly, reproducing the known Pomeron eigenvalue 4 g^2 chi (5.20), an independent quantitative check rather than an input. The odd powers of g are consequences of the massless-root structure whose count N=4 is determined numerically from the QSC's gluing-matrix asymptotics (B.19)-(B.21); this is an empirical input, honestly labelled, not a parameter fitted to the predicted odd-g coefficients. The strong-coupling intercept formula (7.3) is openly presented as a numerical fit ('coefficients ... guessed from their numerical value'), so it is not a fitted prediction disguised as a derivation. Self-citations to [22] and [24] provide comparison and context, but the central derivation, checks against [14,20,21], and the numerical QSC data stand independently. No step reduces by construction to its own output.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central derivation consumes three kinds of input: the QSC framework and Regge gluing matrix from prior literature [9,10,16,17,19]; numerically-verified but unproven assumptions specific to this work, namely the omega_13 dominance (B.1) and the massless-mode count N=4/2; and standard analytic tools. The strong-coupling intercept results additionally depend on state-by-state numerical fits. The massless modes are the main invented entity, with falsifiable handles in the odd-g spectrum.

free parameters (3)
  • N (number of massless modes) = N=4 for HTs, N=2 for Reflection Areas
    N is not derived; it is read off from the exponential growth of the gluing matrix in numerical investigations, with the paper stating it is 'not clear... if N>4 corresponds to meaningful Regge trajectories' (Section 3; Appendix B, eqs. (B.19)-(B.21)).
  • Gluing constant zeta (zeta_P) = fixed by cyclicity (3.13)/(3.27)
    zeta originates from QSC quantization and is fixed by the cyclicity condition, not by regression to the target spectrum; it is a consistency-determined constant rather than a data-fit parameter.
  • Strong-coupling intercept levels delta per state = even integers (L=2,4) or odd integers (some L=3 parity-odd), see Table 5
    The constants delta and the 1/sqrt(lambda) coefficients in eq. (7.3) and Table 5 are obtained by fitting numerical QSC data; the paper states the coefficients 'have been guessed from their numerical value'. These are fitted outputs of the strong-coupling analysis, not predictions.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The QSC with the gluing matrix (A.14) correctly describes Regge trajectories in N=4 SYM at finite coupling.
    Invoked throughout Sections 4 and Appendices A-B; the QSC and its Regge adaptation come from [9,10,16,17,19].
  • ad hoc to paper Single-term dominance mu_ab approx Q^-_{ab|13} omega_13 in the BFKL limit, up to wrapping order.
    Equation (B.1); the foundation of the ABBA derivation. The authors state it was 'extensively verified from numerical solutions' but is not proven analytically.
  • domain assumption The gluing matrix has exponential asymptotic G ~ e^{2pi u}, bounding the number of massless modes by N <= 4.
    Equation (4.4) and Appendix B eq. (B.19), following the gluing matrix structure deduced in [16,17].
  • ad hoc to paper The ansatz (D.9)-(D.14) for the Laurent polynomial coefficients of P_a with specific g-scaling solves the P-mu system order by order.
    Appendix D; used to reconstruct the Q-system and initialize numerics. Its validity is checked by agreement with ABBA but the ansatz is not systematically justified.
  • standard math Standard analytic tools: hypergeometric solutions of the finite-difference Baxter equation, Gamma-function identities, Wronskian and QQ-relations.
    Section 5.1 and Appendices B and E.
invented entities (1)
  • Massless momentum-carrying Bethe roots z_j (massless modes) independent evidence
    purpose: Generate the odd powers of g in the weak-coupling expansion and account for the massless dispersion; they appear as zeros of mu_12 on the branch cut and come with new dressing phases sigma_{bullet circle}, sigma_{circle circle}, sigma_{circle p}.
    The odd-g contributions to gamma_S are matched against numerical QSC data and the earlier observation in [22] (Table 1; Figures 4-6); the massless roots also shift the effective length L to L_eff in the Bethe equations, a falsifiable signature visible in the spectrum.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Regge Trajectories of N=4 SYM Part I: General Asymptotic Baxter-Bethe Ansatz." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4Y3FTF7T

@misc{pith2026250715983,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Regge Trajectories of N=4 SYM Part I: General Asymptotic Baxter-Bethe Ansatz},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4Y3FTF7T}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.15983}
}
read the original abstract

In this work, we derive a novel set of equations - the Asymptotic Baxter--Bethe Ansatz - that determine the asymptotic spectrum of Regge trajectories in the BFKL regime of N=4 SYM. In this challenging limit, our method yields multi-loop results in the 't Hooft coupling, with the perturbative accuracy increasing as the quantum numbers grow. Our formalism not only provides a straightforward path to obtain multi-loop perturbative data, as we demonstrate, but also enables the classification of trajectories, paving the way for systematic non-perturbative studies up to the strong-coupling regime.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The next-to-next-to-leading order BFKL eigenvalue at odd conformal spin in planar N=4 super Yang-Mills: closed form, coefficient structure, and arithmetic

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    The NNLO BFKL eigenvalue of planar N=4 SYM is given in closed form at every odd conformal spin via exact Mellin extraction from the Caron-Huot–Herranen integrand, matching quantum spectral curve intercepts through n=91.

  2. The next-to-next-to-leading order BFKL eigenvalue at odd conformal spin in planar N=4 super Yang-Mills

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The NNLO BFKL eigenvalue of planar N=4 SYM is now in closed form at every odd spin n, with ν=0 intercepts matching Quantum Spectral Curve data through n=91.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [22]

    Regge spectroscopy of higher twist states in $\mathcal{N}=4$ supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory

    R. Klabbers, M. Preti and I. M. Sz´ ecs´ enyi,Regge Spectroscopy of Higher-Twist States in N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 191601 [2307.15107]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  2. [24]

    Long Range Asymptotic Baxter-Bethe Ansatz for N=4 BFKL

    S. Ekhammar, N. Gromov and M. Preti,Long Range Asymptotic Baxter-Bethe Ansatz for N=4 BFKL,2406.18639

    work page Pith review arXiv

  3. [1]

    E. A. Kuraev, L. N. Lipatov and V. S. Fadin,Multi-Regge processes in the Yang–Mills theory,Sov. Phys. JETP44(1976) 443

    1976

  4. [2]

    E. A. Kuraev, L. N. Lipatov and V. S. Fadin,Pomeranchuk singularity in nonabelian gauge theories,Sov. Phys. JETP45(1977) 199

    1977

  5. [3]

    I. I. Balitsky and L. N. Lipatov,The Pomeranchuk singularity in Quantum Chromodynamics,Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.28(1978) 822

    1978

  6. [4]

    V. S. Fadin and L. N. Lipatov,BFKL pomeron in the next-to-leading approximation,Phys. Lett. B429(1998) 127 [hep-ph/9802290]

    arXiv 1998

  7. [5]

    Ciafaloni and G

    M. Ciafaloni and G. Camici,Energy scale(s) and next-to-leading BFKL equation,Phys. Lett. B430(1998) 349 [hep-ph/9803389]

    arXiv 1998

  8. [6]

    A. V. Kotikov and L. N. Lipatov,DGLAP and BFKL equations in theN= 4 supersymmetric gauge theory,Nucl. Phys. B661(2003) 19 [hep-ph/0208220]

    arXiv 2003

Show all 99 references
  1. [7]

    Cornalba,Eikonal methods in AdS/CFT: Regge theory and multi-reggeon exchange, 0710.5480

    L. Cornalba,Eikonal methods in AdS/CFT: Regge theory and multi-reggeon exchange, 0710.5480. – 73 –

    arXiv

  2. [8]

    M. S. Costa, V. Goncalves and J. Penedones,Conformal Regge theory,JHEP12(2012) 091 [1209.4355]

    2012 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Gromov, V

    N. Gromov, V. Kazakov, S. Leurent and D. Volin,Quantum Spectral Curve for Planar N= 4Super-Yang-Mills Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.112(2014) 011602 [1305.1939]

    2014 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Gromov, V

    N. Gromov, V. Kazakov, S. Leurent and D. Volin,Quantum spectral curve for arbitrary state/operator in AdS5/CFT4,JHEP09(2015) 187 [1405.4857]

    2015 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Beisert and M

    N. Beisert and M. Staudacher,Long-range psu(2,2—4) Bethe Ansatze for gauge theory and strings,Nucl. Phys. B727(2005) 1 [hep-th/0504190]

    2005 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Beisert, B

    N. Beisert, B. Eden and M. Staudacher,Transcendentality and Crossing,J. Stat. Mech. 0701(2007) P01021 [hep-th/0610251]

    2007 arXiv

  7. [13]

    A. V. Kotikov, L. N. Lipatov, A. Rej, M. Staudacher and V. N. Velizhanin,Dressing and wrapping,J. Stat. Mech.0710(2007) P10003 [0704.3586]

    2007 arXiv

  8. [14]

    A. V. Kotikov and L. N. Lipatov,NLO corrections to the BFKL equation in QCD and in supersymmetric gauge theories,Nucl. Phys. B582(2000) 19 [hep-ph/0004008]

    2000 arXiv

  9. [15]

    R. A. Janik,Twist-two operators and the BFKL regime - nonstandard solutions of the Baxter equation,JHEP11(2013) 153 [1309.2844]

    2013 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Alfimov, N

    M. Alfimov, N. Gromov and V. Kazakov,QCD Pomeron from AdS/CFT Quantum Spectral Curve,JHEP07(2015) 164 [1408.2530]

    2015 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Gromov, F

    N. Gromov, F. Levkovich-Maslyuk and G. Sizov,Quantum Spectral Curve and the Numerical Solution of the Spectral Problem in AdS5/CFT4,JHEP06(2016) 036 [1504.06640]

    2016 arXiv

  12. [18]

    Gromov, F

    N. Gromov, F. Levkovich-Maslyuk and G. Sizov,Pomeron Eigenvalue at Three Loops in N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 251601 [1507.04010]

    2015 arXiv

  13. [19]

    Alfimov, N

    M. Alfimov, N. Gromov and G. Sizov,BFKL spectrum ofN= 4: non-zero conformal spin, JHEP07(2018) 181 [1802.06908]

    2018 arXiv

  14. [20]

    Caron-Huot and M

    S. Caron-Huot and M. Herranen,High-energy evolution to three loops,JHEP02(2018) 058 [1604.07417]

    2018 arXiv

  15. [21]

    V. N. Velizhanin,BFKL pomeron in the next-to-next-to-leading approximation in the planar N=4 SYM theory,1508.02857

    arXiv

  16. [23]

    Brizio, A

    N. Brizio, A. Cavagli` a, R. Tateo and V. Tripodi,Regge trajectories and bridges between them in integrable AdS/CFT,2410.08927

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    L. N. Lipatov,Asymptotic behavior of multicolor QCD at high energies in connection with exactly solvable spin models,JETP Lett.59(1994) 596 [hep-th/9311037]

    1994 arXiv

  18. [26]

    L. D. Faddeev and G. P. Korchemsky,High-energy QCD as a completely integrable model, Phys. Lett. B342(1995) 311 [hep-th/9404173]

    1995 arXiv

  19. [27]

    H. J. De Vega and L. N. Lipatov,Interaction of reggeized gluons in the Baxter-Sklyanin – 74 – representation,Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 114019 [hep-ph/0107225]

    2001 arXiv

  20. [28]

    A. V. Kotikov,The property of maximal transcendentality in the N=4 SYM,Phys. Part. Nucl.41(2010) 951 [1002.3547]

    2010 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Brandhuber, G

    A. Brandhuber, G. Travaglini and G. Yang,Analytic two-loop form factors in N=4 SYM, JHEP05(2012) 082 [1201.4170]

    2012 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Loebbert, D

    F. Loebbert, D. Nandan, C. Sieg, M. Wilhelm and G. Yang,On-shell methods for the two-loop dilatation operator and finite remainders,Journal of High Energy Physics2015 (2015)

    2015

  23. [31]

    Brandhuber, M

    A. Brandhuber, M. Kostacinska, B. Penante, G. Travaglini and D. Young,The su(2—3) dynamic two-loop form factors,Journal of High Energy Physics2016(2016)

    2016

  24. [32]

    Loebbert, C

    F. Loebbert, C. Sieg, M. Wilhelm and G. Yang,Two-loop sl(2) form factors and maximal transcendentality,Journal of High Energy Physics2016(2016)

    2016

  25. [33]

    Brandhuber, M

    A. Brandhuber, M. Kostacinska, B. Penante and G. Travaglini,Higgs amplitudes from N= 4super Yang-Mills theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 161601 [1707.09897]

    2017 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Y. Li, A. von Manteuffel, R. M. Schabinger and H. X. Zhu,Soft-virtual corrections to Higgs production at N 3LO,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 036008 [1412.2771]

    2015 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Li and H

    Y. Li and H. X. Zhu,Bootstrapping rapidity anomalous dimensions for transverse-momentum resummation,Physical Review Letters118(2017)

    2017

  28. [36]

    Balitsky,Operator expansion for high-energy scattering,Nucl

    I. Balitsky,Operator expansion for high-energy scattering,Nucl. Phys. B463(1996) 99 [hep-ph/9509348]

    1996 arXiv

  29. [37]

    I. I. Balitsky and A. V. Radyushkin,Light ray evolution equations and leading twist parton helicity dependent nonforward distributions,Phys. Lett. B413(1997) 114 [hep-ph/9706410]

    1997 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Balitsky, V

    I. Balitsky, V. Kazakov and E. Sobko,Two-point correlator of twist-2 light-ray operators in N=4 SYM in BFKL approximation,Nucl. Phys. B993(2023) 116267 [1310.3752]

    2023 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Homrich, D

    A. Homrich, D. Simmons-Duffin and P. Vieira,Light-ray wave functions and integrability, JHEP10(2024) 125 [2409.02160]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Kravchuk and D

    P. Kravchuk and D. Simmons-Duffin,Light-ray operators in conformal field theory,JHEP 11(2018) 102 [1805.00098]

    2018 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Kologlu, P

    M. Kologlu, P. Kravchuk, D. Simmons-Duffin and A. Zhiboedov,The light-ray OPE and conformal colliders,JHEP01(2021) 128 [1905.01311]

    2021 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Chang, H

    C.-H. Chang, H. Chen, D. Simmons-Duffin and H. X. Zhu,Seeing through the confinement screen: DGLAP/BFKL mixing and light-ray matching in QCD,2506.06431

  35. [43]

    Moult and H

    I. Moult and H. X. Zhu,Energy Correlators: A Journey From Theory to Experiment, 2506.09119

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    Cavagli` a, N

    A. Cavagli` a, N. Gromov, J. Julius and M. Preti,Integrability and conformal bootstrap: One dimensional defect conformal field theory,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) L021902 [2107.08510]

    2022 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Cavagli` a, N

    A. Cavagli` a, N. Gromov, J. Julius and M. Preti,Bootstrability in defect CFT: integrated correlators and sharper bounds,JHEP05(2022) 164 [2203.09556]

    2022 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Cavagli` a, N

    A. Cavagli` a, N. Gromov, J. Julius and M. Preti,Integrated correlators from integrability: Maldacena-Wilson line inN= 4 SYM,JHEP04(2023) 026 [2211.03203]. – 75 –

    2023 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Caron-Huot, F

    S. Caron-Huot, F. Coronado, A.-K. Trinh and Z. Zahraee,BootstrappingN= 4 sYM correlators using integrability,JHEP02(2023) 083 [2207.01615]

    2023 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Cavagli` a, N

    A. Cavagli` a, N. Gromov and M. Preti,Computing four-point functions with integrability, bootstrap and parity symmetry,JHEP02(2025) 026 [2312.11604]

    2025 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Caron-Huot, F

    S. Caron-Huot, F. Coronado and Z. Zahraee,BootstrappingN= 4 sYM correlators using integrability and localization,JHEP05(2025) 220 [2412.00249]

    2025 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Cavagli` a, N

    A. Cavagli` a, N. Gromov, J. Julius, M. Preti and N. S. Sokolova,Probing line defect CFT with mixed-correlator bootstrability,JHEP06(2025) 165 [2412.07624]

    2025 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Regge Trajectories ofN= 4 SYM Part 2: Collision and Branching Transitions

    S. Ekhammar, N. Gromov and M. Preti, “Regge Trajectories ofN= 4 SYM Part 2: Collision and Branching Transitions.” 2025

    2025

  44. [52]

    Ekhammar, N

    S. Ekhammar, N. Gromov, H. ´Arp´ ad, M. Preti and N. Sokolova,Fast QSC Solver II: Continuous Spin,

  45. [53]

    Ekhammar, N

    S. Ekhammar, N. Gromov and B. Stefa´ nski,Demystifying the Massless Sector in AdS 3 Quantum Spectral Curve,2412.11915

    arXiv

  46. [54]

    Frolov and A

    S. Frolov and A. Sfondrini,New dressing factors for AdS3/CFT2,JHEP04(2022) 162 [2112.08896]

    2022 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Correa, J

    D. Correa, J. Maldacena and A. Sever,The quark anti-quark potential and the cusp anomalous dimension from a TBA equation,JHEP08(2012) 134 [1203.1913]

    2012 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Drukker,Integrable Wilson loops,JHEP10(2013) 135 [1203.1617]

    N. Drukker,Integrable Wilson loops,JHEP10(2013) 135 [1203.1617]

    2013 arXiv

  49. [57]

    D. H. Correa, V. I. Giraldo-Rivera and M. Lagares,Integrable Wilson loops in ABJM: a Y-system computation of the cusp anomalous dimension,JHEP06(2023) 179 [2304.01924]

    2023

  50. [58]

    Gromov, V

    N. Gromov, V. Kazakov, A. Kozak and P. Vieira,Exact Spectrum of Anomalous Dimensions of Planar N = 4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory: TBA and excited states, Lett. Math. Phys.91(2010) 265 [0902.4458]

    2010 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Bombardelli, D

    D. Bombardelli, D. Fioravanti and R. Tateo,Thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz for planar AdS/CFT: A Proposal,J. Phys. A42(2009) 375401 [0902.3930]

    2009 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Arutyunov and S

    G. Arutyunov and S. Frolov,Thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz for the AdS(5) x S(5) Mirror Model,JHEP05(2009) 068 [0903.0141]

    2009 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Beccaria,Anomalous dimensions at twist-3 in the sl(2) sector of N=4 SYM,JHEP06 (2007) 044 [0704.3570]

    M. Beccaria,Anomalous dimensions at twist-3 in the sl(2) sector of N=4 SYM,JHEP06 (2007) 044 [0704.3570]

    2007 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Korchemsky,Bethe ansatz for qcd pomeron,Nuclear Physics B443(1995) 255–301

    G. Korchemsky,Bethe ansatz for qcd pomeron,Nuclear Physics B443(1995) 255–301

    1995

  55. [63]

    R. C. Brower, J. Polchinski, M. J. Strassler and C.-I. Tan,The Pomeron and gauge/string duality,JHEP12(2007) 005 [hep-th/0603115]

    2007 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Basso,An exact slope for AdS/CFT,1109.3154

    B. Basso,An exact slope for AdS/CFT,1109.3154

    arXiv

  57. [65]

    A. V. Kotikov and L. N. Lipatov,Pomeron in the N=4 supersymmetric gauge model at strong couplings,Nucl. Phys. B874(2013) 889 [1301.0882]

    2013 arXiv

  58. [66]

    R. C. Brower, M. S. Costa, M. Djuri´ c, T. Raben and C.-I. Tan,Strong Coupling Expansion for the Conformal Pomeron/Odderon Trajectories,JHEP02(2015) 104 [1409.2730]

    2015 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Gromov, F

    N. Gromov, F. Levkovich-Maslyuk, G. Sizov and S. Valatka,Quantum spectral curve at work: from small spin to strong coupling inN= 4 SYM,JHEP07(2014) 156 [1402.0871]. – 76 –

    2014 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Ekhammar, N

    S. Ekhammar, N. Gromov and P. Ryan,New Approach to Strongly Coupled N = 4 SYM via Integrability,2406.02698

    arXiv

  61. [69]

    Cavaglia, D

    A. Cavaglia, D. Grabner, N. Gromov and A. Sever,Colour-twist operators. Part I. Spectrum and wave functions,JHEP06(2020) 092 [2001.07259]

    2020 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Kazakov and E

    V. Kazakov and E. Olivucci,Biscalar Integrable Conformal Field Theories in Any Dimension,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 131601 [1801.09844]

    2018 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Alfimov, N

    M. Alfimov, N. Gromov and V. Kazakov,Chapter 13: N=4 SYM Quantum Spectral Curve in BFKL Regime, pp. 335–367. 2021.2003.03536

    2021

  64. [72]

    G¨ urdo˘ gan and V

    ¨O. G¨ urdo˘ gan and V. Kazakov,New Integrable 4D Quantum Field Theories from Strongly Deformed PlanarN=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016) 201602 [1512.06704]

    2016 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Gromov, V

    N. Gromov, V. Kazakov, G. Korchemsky, S. Negro and G. Sizov,Integrability of Conformal Fishnet Theory,JHEP01(2018) 095 [1706.04167]

    2018 arXiv

  66. [74]

    G. P. Korchemsky, J. Kotanski and A. N. Manashov,Multi-reggeon compound states and resummed anomalous dimensions in QCD,Phys. Lett. B583(2004) 121 [hep-ph/0306250]

    2004 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Giombi, R

    S. Giombi, R. Roiban and A. A. Tseytlin,Half-BPS Wilson loop and AdS 2/CFT1,Nucl. Phys. B922(2017) 499 [1706.00756]

    2017 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Ferrero and C

    P. Ferrero and C. Meneghelli,Unmixing the Wilson line defect CFT. Part II. Analytic bootstrap,JHEP06(2024) 010 [2312.12551]

    2024 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Gromov and F

    N. Gromov and F. Levkovich-Maslyuk,Quark-anti-quark potential inN=4 SYM,JHEP 12(2016) 122 [1601.05679]

    2016 arXiv

  70. [78]

    L. F. Alday, M. Nocchi, C. Virally and X. Zhou,On the Regge behaviour of the AdS Virasoro-Shapiro amplitude,JHEP04(2025) 064 [2409.03695]

    2025 arXiv

  71. [79]

    L. F. Alday and T. Hansen,The ads virasoro-shapiro amplitude,Journal of High Energy Physics2023(2023)

    2023

  72. [80]

    Basso and A

    B. Basso and A. Georgoudis,Exploring Structure Constants in PlanarN= 4SYM: From Small Spin to Strong Coupling,2504.07922

    arXiv

  73. [81]

    Julius and N

    J. Julius and N. Sokolova,Conformal field theory-data analysis forN= 4 Super-Yang-Mills at strong coupling,JHEP03(2024) 090 [2310.06041]

    2024 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Julius and N

    J. Julius and N. S. Sokolova,Unmixing sub-leading Regge trajectories ofN= 4 Super-Yang-Mills,JHEP04(2025) 200 [2409.07529]

    2025 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Lukaszuk and B

    L. Lukaszuk and B. Nicolescu,A Possible interpretation of p p rising total cross-sections, Lett. Nuovo Cim.8(1973) 405

    1973

  76. [84]

    Cs¨ org˝ o, T

    T. Cs¨ org˝ o, T. Novak, R. Pasechnik, A. Ster and I. Szanyi,Evidence of Odderon-exchange from scaling properties of elastic scattering at TeV energies,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 180 [1912.11968]. [85]D0, TOTEMcollaboration,Odderon Exchange from Elastic Scattering Differences bet...

    2021 arXiv

  77. [86]

    L. N. Lipatov,High-energy asymptotics of multicolor QCD and two-dimensional conformal field theories,Phys. Lett. B309(1993) 394. – 77 –

    1993

  78. [87]

    Kazakov,Quantum Spectral Curve ofγ-twistedN= 4SYM theory and fishnet CFT, 1802.02160

    V. Kazakov,Quantum Spectral Curve ofγ-twistedN= 4SYM theory and fishnet CFT, 1802.02160

    arXiv

  79. [88]

    Levkovich-Maslyuk,A review of the AdS/CFT Quantum Spectral Curve,J

    F. Levkovich-Maslyuk,A review of the AdS/CFT Quantum Spectral Curve,J. Phys. A53 (2020) 283004 [1911.13065]

    2020 arXiv

  80. [89]

    Gromov, A

    N. Gromov, A. Hegedus, J. Julius and N. Sokolova,Fast QSC solver: tool for systematic study ofN= 4 Super-Yang-Mills spectrum,JHEP05(2024) 185 [2306.12379]

    2024 arXiv

  81. [90]

    R. A. Janik and T. Lukowski,Wrapping interactions at strong coupling: The Giant magnon,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 126008 [0708.2208]

    2007 arXiv

  82. [91]

    Bajnok, A

    Z. Bajnok, A. Hegedus, R. A. Janik and T. Lukowski,Five loop Konishi from AdS/CFT, Nucl. Phys. B827(2010) 426 [0906.4062]

    2010 arXiv

  83. [92]

    R. A. Janik,Review of AdS/CFT Integrability, Chapter III.5: L¨ uscher Corrections,Lett. Math. Phys.99(2012) 277 [1012.3994]

    2012 arXiv

  84. [93]

    Bombardelli, A

    D. Bombardelli, A. Cavagli` a, D. Fioravanti, N. Gromov and R. Tateo,The full quantum spectral curve for ads4/cft3,Journal of High Energy Physics2017(2017)

    2017

  85. [94]

    Cavagli` a, N

    A. Cavagli` a, N. Gromov, B. Stefa´ nski, Jr. and A. Torrielli,Quantum Spectral Curve for AdS3/CFT2: a proposal,JHEP12(2021) 048 [2109.05500]

    2021 arXiv

  86. [95]

    Ekhammar and D

    S. Ekhammar and D. Volin,Monodromy bootstrap for SU(2—2) quantum spectral curves: from Hubbard model to AdS 3/CFT2,JHEP03(2022) 192 [2109.06164]

    2022 arXiv

  87. [96]

    Frolov, D

    S. Frolov, D. Polvara and A. Sfondrini,Exchange relations and crossing,2506.04096

    arXiv

  88. [97]

    Volin,Minimal solution of the AdS/CFT crossing equation,J

    D. Volin,Minimal solution of the AdS/CFT crossing equation,J. Phys. A42(2009) 372001 [0904.4929]

    2009 arXiv

  89. [98]

    Vieira and D

    P. Vieira and D. Volin,Review of AdS/CFT Integrability, Chapter III.3: The Dressing factor,Lett. Math. Phys.99(2012) 231 [1012.3992]

    2012 arXiv

  90. [99]

    Marboe and D

    C. Marboe and D. Volin,The full spectrum of AdS 5/CFT4 II: Weak coupling expansion via the quantum spectral curve,J. Phys. A54(2021) 055201 [1812.09238]

    2021 arXiv

  91. [100]

    Leurent and D

    S. Leurent and D. Volin,Multiple zeta functions and double wrapping in planarN= 4 SYM,Nucl. Phys. B875(2013) 757 [1302.1135]. – 78 –

    2013 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.