Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 44 references

Double-offset Cassegrain telescopes for the Ultraviolet Type Ia (UVIa) mission concept

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that three small double-offset Cassegrain telescopes on a SmallSat bus can catch Type Ia supernovae in the ultraviolet within days, reaching 21.5 mag AB sensitivity with red-light rejection below $10^{-5}$.

desk verdict A clean optical design study whose headline sensitivity and red-rejection numbers are asserted rather than derived in the paper itself. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.16006 v1 pith:663LT5AL submitted 2025-07-21 astro-ph.IM

Fernando Cruz Aguirre , Keri Hoadley , Curtis McCully , Gillian Kyne , Shouleh Nikzad , John Hennessy , April D. Jewell , Christophe Basset
show 8 more authors
Daniel Harbeck Greyson Davis Leonidas A. Moustakas D. Andrew Howell Saurabh W. Jha David J. Sand Peter Brown Ken Shen
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.IM PACS 95.55.-n95.55.Fw
keywords TypeIasupernovaeultravioletastronomydouble-offsetCassegraintelescopeSmallSatinstrumentdesignatomiclayerdepositioncoatingsdelta-dopedCMOSdetectorsmetal-dielectricfiltersspacephotometry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

UVIa is a proposed SmallSat whose purpose is to see Type Ia supernovae in the ultraviolet within the first few days after detonation, when the light encodes information about the companion star that triggered the explosion. This paper argues that three double-offset Cassegrain telescopes — two 80 mm UV channels and one 50 mm $u$-band channel — can do that from a commercial small-satellite bus. The projected performance is 21.5 mag AB sensitivity, out-of-band red-light rejection below $10^{-5}$, better than $<12''$ resolution with 61–69% margin, and a field of view 6.25 times larger than the $>1\,\text{deg}^2$ requirement. The enabling pieces are atomic-layer-deposited multilayer mirror coatings that define the UV bandpasses, delta-doped CMOS detectors, and detector-integrated metal-dielectric filters that block optical light. If the design performs as modeled, UVIa would be a pathfinder showing that UV transient science and its technology can fit on a SmallSat.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the double-offset Cassegrain telescope: a concave off-axis parabolic primary and a convex off-axis hyperbolic secondary, both with square apertures and arranged so the secondary redirects light parallel to the primary's optical axis. The design is parameterized by the secondary's radius of curvature and conic constant, with the radius set equal and opposite to the primary's so that Petzval field curvature at the focal plane is zero, improving off-axis spot sizes. Bandpass definition and red-light rejection come from atomic-layer-deposited multilayer mirror coatings plus detector-integrated metal-dielectric filters on delta-doped CMOS detectors, and the projected performance combines raytraced PSFs, coating reflectivity, detector quantum efficiency, and a jitter-plus-thermal error budget.

What would settle it

Put the proposed design in a raytrace with a measured jitter power spectral density from the chosen spacecraft bus; if the on-axis encircled-energy diameter exceeds 12 arcsec under that input, or if a prototype 28-layer ALD coating at 65 degrees incidence measures below the modeled in-band reflectance, the central performance claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that a compact, unobscured, three-channel double-offset Cassegrain system can meet all of the instrument requirements for early ultraviolet observations of Type Ia supernovae. The two UV channels use identical 80 mm square-aperture telescopes and the $u$-band channel uses a 50 mm version, all imaging onto CIS120 CMOS detectors. With multilayer coatings on the UV mirrors, delta-doping on the UV detectors, and metal-dielectric filters integrated on those detectors, the instrument is projected to reach 21.5 mag AB sensitivity while suppressing red light to below $10^{-5}$ throughput. The design is reported to exceed the $<12''$ angular resolution requirement with 61–69% margin and the $>1\,\text{deg}^2$ field of view requirement by a factor of 6.25.

Load-bearing premise

The resolution budget rests on an assumed 7.0 arcsec RMS of spacecraft jitter plus pointing error; if the real commercial bus jitters more than this, or the simplified fused-silica thermal model underestimates defocus, the projected 7.1–7.5 arcsec spot sizes could exceed the 12 arcsec requirement.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Early UV light curves of Type Ia supernovae would become observable from a SmallSat, directly testing progenitor models that predict different UV signatures in the first days after detonation.
  • Simultaneous FUV, NUV, and $u$-band photometry with $<10^{-5}$ red-light rejection would provide the color information needed to distinguish explosion pathways and tie space UV data to ground-based $u$-band surveys.
  • The identical optical design for the two UV channels and the square apertures reduce fabrication and alignment burden while maximizing collecting area within a CubeSat-class payload.
  • The modeled margins (61–69% on resolution, 6.25$\times$ on field of view) mean the instrument requirements are met with room to spare if the input assumptions hold.
  • The technologies would be demonstrated together in space for the first time, raising their maturity for future ultraviolet missions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the resolution margin is effectively a spacecraft pointing requirement in disguise; choosing a bus with a measured jitter well below 7 arcsec RMS would convert the cited 61–69% margin into a much larger one.
  • A testable extension is to apply the same two-bounce-plus-filter strategy to other UV transient missions, since the paper's own trade study indicates a single coated mirror cannot provide sufficient red-light rejection.
  • The design rule that equal-and-opposite radii of the primary and secondary flatten the Petzval field is portable: future double-offset designs could trade off-axis angle against focal length to improve off-axis PSFs.
  • A straightforward laboratory check of the 28-layer coating at roughly 65 degrees incidence and the 7-layer metal-dielectric filters at roughly 5 degrees incidence could validate the modeled throughput before flight.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents the optical design and projected performance of UVIa, a proposed SmallSat with three co-aligned double-offset Cassegrain telescopes for far-UV (1500–1800 Å), near-UV (1800–2400 Å), and Sloan u-band (3000–4200 Å) photometry of early Type Ia supernovae. It describes an analytic parameterization of off-axis hyperbolic secondaries, the resulting prescriptions for an 80 mm f/3.9 UV telescope pair and a 50 mm f/5.7 u-band telescope, and the enabling technologies of ALD multilayer mirror coatings, delta-doped CMOS detectors, and metal-dielectric filters. The paper reports margin against requirements of 61–69% on <12 arcsec angular resolution and 6.25× on >1 deg^2 field of view, and the abstract claims 21.5 mag AB sensitivity and <10^-5 out-of-band rejection.

Significance. If the performance claims hold, UVIa would be a useful UV transient pathfinder and a technology demonstration that matures ALD multilayer coatings, delta-doped CMOS detectors, and metal-dielectric filters for future missions. The optical design is presented in enough detail (Eqs. 1–7 and Table 1) to be reproduced, and the requirements-driven trade study is internally coherent. However, the headline sensitivity and red-rejection figures are not derived or tabulated in this manuscript, and the resolution margin rests on an unsourced spacecraft-jitter assumption, so the quantitative claims cannot be fully checked from this paper alone. The paper does not ship code or supporting data, and it explicitly defers the SNR and out-of-band rejection discussion to Ref. 8.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Section 4] The headline claims of 21.5 mag AB sensitivity and <10^-5 out-of-band throughput are asserted in the abstract but are not derived anywhere in this manuscript. Section 4 states after Table 2 that "Not listed in Tab. 2 is the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and out-of-band rejection; see Ref. 8," and Figure 5 provides curves without numerical values in the text, an exposure time, a source SED, a background model, or an integration-time assumption. The two-bounce mirror out-of-band throughput of <=1% is given in Sec. 3.1.1, but the additional rejection from the metal-dielectric filters and detector response is never multiplied in to reach the abstract's <10^-5. Please either derive these numbers in this paper or revise the abstract so that these values are explicitly attributed to the companion paper (Ref. 8) rather than presented as established by the design described here.
  2. [Section 4, Table 3 and Section 4.1] The projected angular resolution of 7.1 arcsec (UV) and 7.5 arcsec (u-band) is dominated by the assumed 7.0 arcsec RMS "Spacecraft Jitter + Pointing" entry in Table 3, but no specific COTS bus or measured value is cited for this number, and the thermal-defocus term comes from a simplified fused-silica model with a 1.0 arcsec RMS contribution. Because the projected totals sit only about 5 arcsec below the 12 arcsec requirement, an underprediction of jitter or of thermal defocus could erase the claimed 61–69% margin. Please either name the assumed bus with a sourced jitter estimate or add a sensitivity analysis showing how the projected spatial resolution and margin vary with jitter and defocus.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 4] The sentence "The <12" requirement is satisfied for incident light up to a few arcminutes off-axis" appears inconsistent with Section 4.1, which states that the requirement is satisfied only within ~1.3 arcmin of the field center; please reconcile these statements and state the actual radius of the good-resolution region.
  2. [Section 2] The phrase "an concave, off-axis parabolic (OAP) primary" should read "a concave, off-axis parabolic (OAP) primary."
  3. [Section 4 and Figure 5] Please provide numerical values for the effective-area and out-of-band-rejection curves in the text or table, and state the assumed exposure time, source spectrum, and background in the same place; this is especially needed since the "Code, Data, and Materials Availability" section states that there is no supporting data.
  4. [Section 4.1] The notation "3–5'" for off-axis spot sizes should specify arcminutes explicitly, since primes are also used for arcseconds elsewhere in the paper.
  5. [Section 3.1.1] The statement that the two-bounce effective reflectance is ">=70% in the FUV and >=80% in the NUV" could be clarified by noting explicitly that this is the product of the two mirror reflectivities, consistent with the <=1% out-of-band product quoted in the same paragraph.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Headline sensitivity and red-light rejection are deferred to the authors' own companion paper; the optical resolution and FOV margins are derived in-paper, so circularity is partial.

  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract; §4 Projected Instrument Performance (after Table 2)]
    "The instrument design achieves high UV sensitivity (21.5 mag AB) and superior red light rejection (<$10^{-5}$ throughput)... Not listed in Tab. 2 is the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and out-of-band rejection; see Ref. 8."

    The two quantitative headline claims in the abstract are not derived or tabulated anywhere in this manuscript. The only pointer for SNR and out-of-band rejection is Ref. 8, a submitted companion paper by overlapping authors ('The ultraviolet type ia supernova cubesat (uvia): Science motivation & mission concept', K. Hoadley, C. McCully, G. Kyne, et al.). No integrated throughput budget is shown here from which the <10^{-5} red-rejection value could be reconstructed: the only in-text out-of-band number is ≤1% for the two mirror bounces, and the filter/detector rejection curves in Figs. 4-5 are not multiplied into a single number. Thus, within this paper, the advertised sensitivity and red-rejection claims reduce to 'see our sibling paper' rather than to a checkable derivation.

full rationale

The design-projection chain for angular resolution is a direct quadrature of a modeled PSF (with 25% margin), an assumed 7.0 arcsec RMS jitter plus pointing error, and a thermal-defocus estimate; the projected 7.1-7.5 arcsec values are dominated by the assumed jitter input. That is an unverified input assumption rather than an output fed back as an input, so it does not meet the bar for circularity, though it is a real correctness risk. The FOV margin is arithmetic from detector size and focal length, also not circular. The one load-bearing step that is not self-contained is the abstract's headline sensitivity (21.5 mag AB) and red-light rejection (<10^{-5}): these are explicitly deferred to Ref. 8, a submitted companion paper by overlapping authors, and the paper states there is no associated code or supporting data. This makes the central advertised performance figures a self-citation load-bearing claim. However, the paper does contain independent in-paper derivations for the optical design, PSF, FOV, and alignment plan, so the overall circularity is partial rather than total.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is an engineering design paper, so the free parameters are hand-chosen design inputs and assumed environmental inputs on which the projected performance hinges. The optics formulas are standard or cited, and the ALD coatings, metal-dielectric filters, and delta-doped detectors are existing technologies being applied, not new physical entities.

free parameters (7)
  • UV OAP off-axis angle theta_OAP = 63.37 deg
    Hand-chosen to fit the 12U payload volume while providing focal length; sets the large incidence angle that drives off-axis aberration and coating AoI.
  • UV OAH conic constant K_H = -20.1
    Selected to place the far focus so detector electronics fit below the focal plane; changes focal length and on-axis image quality.
  • u-band OAP off-axis angle theta_OAP = 56.72 deg
    Chosen to fit the third channel in the remaining CubeSat payload volume; defines off-axis PSF growth in the u-band.
  • u-band OAH conic constant K_H = -20.0
    Selected for focal-plane placement and to satisfy u-band resolution with the smaller f/5.7 system.
  • Spacecraft jitter plus pointing error = 7.0 arcsec RMS
    Assumed input dominating the error budget; the projected 7.1-7.5 arcsec resolution and 61-69% margin depend on this value more than on the optics.
  • Thermal defocus = 1.0 arcsec RMS (includes 25% margin)
    Estimated from a simplified all-fused-silica thermal model over 275-315 K; enters the error budget and is not verified by thermal-vacuum test.
  • Primary mirror aperture side lengths (UV / u-band) = 80.0 mm / 50.0 mm
    Chosen to maximize collecting area within the payload volume; directly scales the effective area and the 21.5 mag sensitivity claim.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math The off-axis hyperbolic mirror segment can be described by a single incidence angle theta with object and image distances p and q (Goldberg and Sanchez del Rio 2023), with b^2 = p q sin^2 theta and c = 0.5 sqrt(p^2 + q^2 - 2 p q cos 2theta).
    Invoked in Sec. 2 to build the OAH secondary; the hyperbola tangent-bisector property and focal geometry are taken from Ref. 12 without re-derivation.
  • domain assumption Setting the OAH radius of curvature equal and opposite to the OAP radius yields zero Petzval field curvature at the focal plane.
    Sec. 2 states this result without proof or citation; it is load-bearing for the claimed improvement in off-axis spot sizes.
  • domain assumption The ALD AlF3/LaF3 multilayer coating models, using Palik and Sopra optical constants and ellipsometry data, predict the in-band reflectance and out-of-band rejection in flight.
    Sec. 3.1 uses TFCalc and lab samples; only one 16-layer prototype at 1400 A is reported, with no error bars, lifetime, or contamination effects.
  • domain assumption Delta-doped Capella CMOS detectors will reach the modeled absolute QE (about 40% FUV and 55% NUV) with the integrated metal-dielectric filters.
    Sec. 3.2 extrapolates from prior CCD programs; the Capella prototypes are described as currently being characterized, so the QE values remain unverified inputs.
  • domain assumption The COTS CubeSat or SmallSat bus will deliver 7.0 arcsec RMS pointing and jitter and maintain 295 +/- 20 K, producing only about 1 arcsec RMS of thermal defocus.
    Table 3 uses these as fixed inputs; the projected 7.1-7.5 arcsec resolution is almost entirely set by the jitter number, which is not tied to a specific bus or measurement.
  • domain assumption At least three UV-bright calibration stars can be found in the central 1 deg^2 field for typical SNe Ia pointings.
    Sec. 4.1 uses GALEX source densities (Ref. 40) and admits that stars near the field edges may be unresolved for some fields; the requirement is assumed achievable for mission success.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Double-offset Cassegrain telescopes for the Ultraviolet Type Ia (UVIa) mission concept." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/663LT5AL

@misc{pith2026250716006,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Double-offset Cassegrain telescopes for the Ultraviolet Type Ia (UVIa) mission concept},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/663LT5AL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.16006}
}
abstract

Our understanding of cosmology is shaped by Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia), the runaway thermonuclear detonations of white dwarfs via accretion from a companion star. The nature of this companion star is highly debated, with disparate models explaining currently available SNe Ia data. Critical ultraviolet (UV) signatures of SNe Ia progenitors are only observable within the first few days post-detonation. We present the instrument design of UVIa, a proposed SmallSat to make early UV observations of SNe Ia. UVIa conducts simultaneous observations in three photometric channels: far-UV (1500 - 1800 {\AA}), near-UV (1800 - 2400 {\AA}), and Sloan $u$-band (3000 - 4200 {\AA}). UVIa employs two 80 mm double-offset Cassegrain UV telescopes and a similar 50 mm $u$-band telescope, imaging onto three Teledyne e2v CIS120-10-LN CMOS detectors. The UV detectors are delta-doped for enhanced sensitivity, with custom metal-dielectric filters providing further in-band efficiency and red light rejection. The UV optics utilize multi-layer coatings, defining the UV bandpasses and providing additional red light rejection. The instrument design achieves high UV sensitivity (21.5 mag AB) and superior red light rejection ($<$ 10$^{-5}$ throughput), allowing UVIa to make early observations of SNe Ia while serving as a pathfinder for future UV transient telescopes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. G. Riess , A. V. Filippenko , P. Challis , et al. , `` Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant ,'' 116 , 1009--1038 (1998)

    work page 1998

  2. [2]

    Perlmutter , G

    S. Perlmutter , G. Aldering , G. Goldhaber , et al. , `` Measurements of and from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae ,'' 517 , 565--586 (1999)

    work page 1999

  3. [3]

    A. G. Riess , L.-G. Strolger , J. Tonry , et al. , `` Type Ia Supernova Discoveries at z > 1 from the Hubble Space Telescope: Evidence for Past Deceleration and Constraints on Dark Energy Evolution ,'' 607 , 665--687 (2004)

    work page 2004

  4. [4]

    H \"o flich , `` Physics of type Ia supernovae ,'' 777 , 579--600 (2006)

    P. H \"o flich , `` Physics of type Ia supernovae ,'' 777 , 579--600 (2006)

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    Mori , M

    K. Mori , M. A. Famiano , T. Kajino , et al. , `` Impacts of the new carbon fusion cross-sections on type Ia supernovae ,'' 482 , L70--L74 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    M. M. Phillips , `` The Absolute Magnitudes of Type IA Supernovae ,'' 413 , L105 (1993)

    work page 1993

  7. [7]

    Perlmutter , S

    S. Perlmutter , S. Gabi , G. Goldhaber , et al. , `` Measurements of the Cosmological Parameters and from the First Seven Supernovae at z > = 0.35 ,'' 483 , 565--581 (1997)

    work page 1997

  8. [8]

    Hoadley , C

    K. Hoadley , C. McCully , G. Kyne , et al. , ``The ultraviolet type ia supernova cubesat (uvia): Science motivation & mission concept,'' Submitted, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems (2025)

    work page 2025

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    Cruz Aguirre , K

    F. Cruz Aguirre , K. Hoadley , C. McCully , et al. , `` The optical design of the UVIa CubeSat: a multichannel ultraviolet telescope for transient science ,'' in Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray , J.-W. A. den Herder , S. Nikzad , and K. Naka...

    2024

  2. [10]

    C. S. Kochanek , B. J. Shappee , K. Z. Stanek , et al. , `` The All-Sky Automated Survey for Supernovae (ASAS-SN) Light Curve Server v1.0 ,'' 129 , 104502 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    G. Ju , H. Ma , and C. Yan , `` Aberration fields of off-axis astronomical telescopes induced by rotational misalignments ,'' Optics Express 26 , 24816 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    K. A. Goldberg and M. Sanchez del Rio , `` Off-axis representation of hyperbolic mirror shapes for X-ray beamlines ,'' Journal of Synchrotron Radiation 30 , 514--518 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    France , B

    K. France , B. Fleming , A. Egan , et al. , `` The Colorado Ultraviolet Transit Experiment Mission Overview ,'' 165 , 63 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Indahl , B

    B. Indahl , B. Fleming , D. Vorobiev , et al. , `` Status and mission operations of the SPRITE 12U CubeSat: a probe of star formation feedback from stellar to galactic scales with far-UV imaging spectroscopy ,'' in UV, X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Space Instrumentation for Astronomy X...

    2023

  7. [15]

    M. C. Troparevsky , A. S. Sabau , A. R. Lupini , et al. , `` Transfer-matrix formalism for the calculation of optical response in multilayer systems: from coherent to incoherent interference ,'' Optics Express 18 , 24715 (2010)

    2010

  8. [16]

    , `` TFC alc: Thin film design software for windows.'' Version 3.5 (2009)

    Hulinks Inc. , `` TFC alc: Thin film design software for windows.'' Version 3.5 (2009)

    2009

  9. [17]

    E. D. Palik , Handbook of optical constants of solids , Academic Press (1985)

    1985

  10. [18]

    D. C. Martin , J. Fanson , D. Schiminovich , et al. , `` The Galaxy Evolution Explorer: A Space Ultraviolet Survey Mission ,'' 619 , L1--L6 (2005)

    2005

  11. [19]

    De Pontieu , A

    B. De Pontieu , A. M. Title , J. R. Lemen , et al. , `` The Interface Region Imaging Spectrograph (IRIS) ,'' 289 , 2733--2779 (2014)

    2014

  12. [20]

    Hennessy , C

    J. Hennessy , C. S. Moore , K. Balasubramanian , et al. , `` Atomic layer deposition and etching methods for far ultraviolet aluminum mirrors ,'' in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series , Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers...

    2017

  13. [21]

    Hennessy , A

    J. Hennessy , A. D. Jewell , M. E. Hoenk , et al. , `` Materials and process development for the fabrication of far ultraviolet device-integrated filters for visible-blind Si sensors ,'' in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series , N. K. Dha...

    2017

  14. [22]

    W. J. Tropf , `` Temperature-dependent refractive index models for BaF2, CaF2, MgF2, SrF2, LiF, NaF, KCl, ZnS, and ZnSe ,'' Optical Engineering 34 , 1369--1373 (1995)

    1995

  15. [23]

    D. B. Leviton , B. J. Frey , and T. Kvamme , `` High accuracy, absolute, cryogenic refractive index measurements of infrared lens materials for JWST NIRCam using CHARMS ,'' in Cryogenic Optical Systems and Instruments XI , J. B. Heaney and L. G. Burriesci , Eds., Society of Ph...

    2005

  16. [24]

    J. C. Green , E. Wilkinson , and S. D. Friedman , `` Design of the Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer spectrograph ,'' in X-Ray and Ultraviolet Spectroscopy and Polarimetry , S. Fineschi , Ed., Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series 228...

    1994

  17. [25]

    Fleming , M

    B. Fleming , M. Quijada , J. Hennessy , et al. , `` Advanced environmentally resistant lithium fluoride mirror coatings for the next generation of broadband space observatories ,'' 56 , 9941 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    Quijada , J

    M. Quijada , J. Del Hoyo , L. Rodriguez de Marcos , et al. , `` Enhanced Far Ultra-Violet Optical Properties of Physical Vapor Deposited Aluminum Mirrors through Fluorination ,'' in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts , American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstrac...

    2024

  19. [27]

    Gil Otero , R

    R. Gil Otero , R. Mackie , C. Greenaway , et al. , `` Capella: CIS120 general purpose CMOS sensor for space applications ,'' in International Conference on Space Optics &mdash; ICSO 2020 , B. Cugny , Z. Sodnik , and N. Karafolas , Eds., Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation...

    2021

  20. [28]

    Nikzad , A

    S. Nikzad , A. D. Jewell , M. E. Hoenk , et al. , `` High-efficiency UV/optical/NIR detectors for large aperture telescopes and UV explorer missions: development of and field observations with delta-doped arrays ,'' Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems ...

    2017

  21. [29]

    Jewell , J

    A. Jewell , J. Hennessy , T. Jones , et al. , `` Ultraviolet detectors for astrophysics missions: a case study with the star-planet activity research cubesat (SPARC) ,'' in High Energy, Optical, and Infrared Detectors for Astronomy VIII , A. D. Holland and J. Beletic , Eds., S...

    2018

  22. [30]

    M. E. Hoenk , A. D. Jewell , G. Kyne , et al. , `` Surface Passivation by Quantum Exclusion: On the Quantum Efficiency and Stability of Delta-Doped CCDs and CMOS Image Sensors in Space ,'' Sensors 23 , 9857 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    A. D. Jewell , C. Basset , S. Nikzad , et al. , `` Performance of the SPARCS UV camera and detectors ,'' in Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray , J.-W. A. den Herder , S. Nikzad , and K. Nakazawa , Eds., Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation ...

    2024

  24. [32]

    Kyne , E

    G. Kyne , E. T. Hamden , S. Nikzad , et al. , `` Delta-doped electron-multiplying CCDs for FIREBall-2 ,'' Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems 6 , 011007 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    Nikzad , M

    S. Nikzad , M. E. Hoenk , F. Greer , et al. , `` Delta-doped electron-multiplied CCD with absolute quantum efficiency over 50\

  26. [34]

    P. A. Mazzali , M. Sullivan , S. Hachinger , et al. , `` Hubble Space Telescope spectra of the Type Ia supernova SN 2011fe: a tail of low-density, high-velocity material with Z < Z _ ,'' 439 , 1959--1979 (2014)

    2014

  27. [35]

    Hennessy , A

    J. Hennessy , A. D. Jewell , M. E. Hoenk , et al. , `` Metal-dielectric filters for solar-blind silicon ultraviolet detectors ,'' 54 , 3507 (2015)

    2015

  28. [36]

    Hennessy , A

    J. Hennessy , A. D. Jewell , M. E. Hoenk , et al. , `` Advances in detector-integrated filter coatings for the far ultraviolet ,'' in UV, X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Space Instrumentation for Astronomy XXII , O. H. Siegmund , Ed., Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (S...

    2021

  29. [37]

    J. T. Trauger , `` Sensors for the Hubble Space Telescope Wide Field and Planetary Cameras (1 and 2). ,'' in CCDs in astronomy , G. H. Jacoby , Ed., Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series 8 , 217--230 (1990)

    1990

  30. [38]

    P. W. A. Roming , T. E. Kennedy , K. O. Mason , et al. , `` The Swift Ultra-Violet/Optical Telescope ,'' 120 , 95--142 (2005)

    2005

  31. [39]

    Greffe , R

    T. Greffe , R. Smith , M. Sherman , et al. , `` Characterization of low light performance of a complementary metal-oxide semiconductor sensor for ultraviolet astronomical applications ,'' Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems 8 , 026004 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    Bianchi , B

    L. Bianchi , B. Shiao , and D. Thilker , `` Revised Catalog of GALEX Ultraviolet Sources. I. The All-Sky Survey: GUVcat\_AIS ,'' 230 , 24 (2017)

    2017

  33. [41]

    Chung , C

    H. Chung , C. J. Vargas , E. Hamden , et al. , `` Aspera: the UV SmallSat telescope to detect and map the warm-hot gas phase in nearby galaxy halos ,'' in UV/Optical/IR Space Telescopes and Instruments: Innovative Technologies and Concepts X , A. A. Barto , J. B. Breckinridge ...

    2021

  34. [42]

    A. R. Khan , E. Hamden , H. Chung , et al. , `` Optical alignment of contamination-sensitive Far-Ultraviolet spectrographs for Aspera SmallSat mission ,'' arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2407.15391 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    Steele , S

    T. Steele , S. D. V. Ament , J. Beverage , et al. , `` Computer generated hologram (CGH) education kit for hands-on learning of optical metrology for complex optics and systems ,'' in Optics Education and Outreach VII , G. G. Gregory and A.-S. Poulin-Girard , Eds., Society of ...

    2022

  36. [44]

    Agarwal , A

    S. Agarwal , A. R. Khan , H. Bradley , et al. , `` Realignment and performance verification of two-mirror focal corrector optics for FIREBall-2 using computer generated hologram (CGH) ,'' in Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray , J.-W. A. den Her...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.