Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 48 references

Chemical Treatment-Induced Indirect-to-Direct Bandgap Transition in MoS2: Impact on Optical Properties

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Soaking multilayer MoS2 in a common solvent, 1,2-dichloroethane, selectively kills the indirect optical transition while sparing the direct one, effectively turning the material into a direct-gap emitter.

desk verdict A useful PL dataset on DCE-treated MoS2 whose title overclaims: the evidence shows selective indirect-PL quenching, not an indirect-to-direct bandgap transition. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.16574 v1 pith:2JBHOOK5 submitted 2025-07-22 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.optics

Yusuf Kerem Bostan , Elanur Hut , Cem Sanga , Nadire Nayir , Ayse Erol , Yue Wang , Fahrettin Sarcan This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.optics
keywords transitionmetaldichalcogenidesmolybdenumdisulfide12-dichloroethanedopingphotoluminescencesulfurvacanciesdensityfunctionaltheorybandgapengineeringindirect-to-direct
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that chemical treatment with 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE) suppresses the indirect bandgap photoluminescence of layered MoS2 while leaving the direct bandgap transition almost unaffected, a selective effect that amounts to an indirect-to-direct optical band structure transition in multilayer material. This matters because multilayer MoS2 normally emits weakly through an indirect gap, so a simple room-temperature chemical dip that preserves the bright direct channel could make thicker flakes useful for light-emitting devices. The authors base the claim on photoluminescence measurements of more than a hundred exfoliated flakes, from monolayer to bulk, treated for times from 30 seconds to 24 hours, and on density functional theory showing that chlorine binds to sulfur vacancies and creates mid-gap states that open non-radiative recombination pathways near the indirect band edge.

What would settle it

Measure the direct-exciton lifetime and absolute photoluminescence quantum yield of the same MoS2 flakes before and after short DCE exposures; if the direct transition's lifetime and yield stay constant while the indirect peak collapses, the band-structure claim survives, and if they drop substantially, the selective-quenching interpretation fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that DCE is not only an n-type dopant but also an optical band-structure engineering tool. After DCE treatment, the indirect PL peak of bilayer MoS2 falls to roughly 18 percent of its initial value while the direct peak retains about 70 percent, and the same selective loss of the indirect transition appears across layer numbers and treatment times, weakening as the flake gets thicker. The authors interpret this as direct evidence that chlorine doping creates mid-gap states that selectively quench the indirect radiative path, while the direct K-point transition stays intact because it is localized in momentum space and less sensitive to defect-induced scattering. Supporting this, their DFT calculations find that chlorine preferentially occupies sulfur vacancies and that this substitutional doping narrows the indirect gap and suppresses the indirect band feature, with van der Waals gap insertion flattening bands and further reducing the gap.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the nearly unchanged direct PL peak proves the direct bandgap and its radiative efficiency are preserved, so the selective loss of indirect PL reflects a band-structure change rather than a global increase in non-radiative recombination or a change in carrier density; the DFT interpretation also assumes that gas-phase chlorine and alpha-sulfur chemical potentials faithfully represent the liquid DCE environment.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • DCE treatment can convert multilayer MoS2 into an effectively direct-gap emitter, so thick flakes could replace monolayers in LEDs, lasers, and other emission-critical devices.
  • The effect is fast, appearing after just two minutes of exposure, and time-tunable, offering a practical room-temperature post-growth knob for optical band structure engineering.
  • The layer-dependent suppression means thicker regions retain more indirect emission, allowing selective optical modification of surface layers in the same flake.
  • The DFT result that chlorine can sit in the van der Waals gap and decouple layers points to an additional, interlayer-coupling-based route for tuning the electronic band structure.
  • Because the direct transition is preserved, DCE doping can simultaneously lower contact resistance and maintain bright emission, combining electrical and optical benefits in one processing step.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mechanism is general, the same DCE chemistry may selectively suppress indirect emission in other multilayer transition metal dichalcogenides such as WSe2 and MoSe2, whose sulfur vacancies are also common, though the site energetics would need to be recomputed for each material.
  • The thickness dependence suggests a spatial-patterning route: masking selected areas during DCE exposure could define direct-gap optical regions inside a multilayer host on the same substrate.
  • A natural extension is time-resolved or temperature-dependent PL: if the direct-exciton lifetime and quantum yield stay constant while the indirect PL collapses, the band-structure reading is strongly supported, whereas a drop in the direct lifetime would point to global non-radiative recombination.
  • The claim that direct K-point states are immune because they are momentum-localized could be tested by comparing the behavior of other momentum-isolated transitions in doped TMDs, which would clarify whether the selectivity is a generic defect physics effect.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a combined photoluminescence (PL) and density functional theory (DFT) study of the effect of 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE) treatment on MoS2 flakes of varying thickness. PL measurements at room temperature show that after DCE treatment, the indirect-gap emission decreases more strongly than the direct-gap emission, with stronger suppression for thinner flakes and longer exposures. DFT calculations for several Cl doping configurations (substitutional at S sites, interstitial on surface, honeycomb, and vdW gap) indicate that substitutional Cl at S vacancies is the most favorable and introduces mid-gap states; the vdW-gap configuration is less favorable but calculated to yield a direct bandgap. The paper concludes that DCE treatment induces an indirect-to-direct bandgap transition in multilayer MoS2, offering a route for optical band-structure engineering.

Significance. If the central claim were correct, DCE treatment would be an extremely simple post-growth method to convert multilayer MoS2 into a direct-gap emitter, with clear implications for 2D optoelectronics. The systematic PL dataset over many layer counts and treatment times, together with first-principles formation energies for multiple Cl configurations, are strengths. The DFT calculations are independent of the PL data and no parameters are fitted to experiment. However, the claim is not supported: the PL intensity ratio is not a band-structure probe, and the DFT calculations identify the favored Cl site as one that preserves the indirect gap. The paper's own non-radiative recombination mechanism explains the PL data without a band ordering change. Thus the significance of the contribution in its current form is limited to being a potential observation of defect-induced PL quenching.

major comments (4)
  1. [Results and Discussion, Fig. 5] The DFT results do not support the claimed indirect-to-direct bandgap transition. The formation-energy analysis in Fig. 4 identifies substitutional Cl at S-vacancy sites (T3 and B3) as the energetically favored doping mechanism (E_form ≈ 1.8 eV), yet the band structures in Fig. 5c and 5d show that these configurations remain indirect. Only the vdW-gap configuration (Fig. 5e) produces a direct gap, and Fig. 4 indicates this configuration is energetically less favorable than substitutional doping. Therefore, for the dominant defect configuration, the calculated band ordering is unchanged; the title claim is in direct tension with the paper's own computational evidence.
  2. [Methods and Results, Figs. 2–3] The PL intensity ratio R = I_doped/I_pristine is not a measurement of the bandgap type. The observation that the indirect peak loses more intensity than the direct peak is equally consistent with a global increase in non-radiative recombination, with a change in carrier density, or with energy-dependent collection/absorption effects. The manuscript provides no absolute PL efficiency calibration, no time-resolved PL or carrier-lifetime data, no excitation-power dependence, and no analysis of PL peak-energy shifts. In particular, if the material had actually become direct, one would expect the total integrated PL intensity to increase rather than remain roughly constant with the direct peak at its original intensity. These missing diagnostics mean the PL data alone cannot establish a change in band ordering.
  3. [Results and Discussion, final paragraph; Conclusion] The mechanism proposed by the authors is internally inconsistent with the title's claim. The final paragraph of the Results and Discussion states that Cl atoms 'settle at defect sites near the MoS2 indirect band level' and 'facilitate non-radiative relaxation ... quenching the PL intensity of the indirect transition.' This is explicitly a non-radiative recombination pathway that suppresses the indirect emission without any change in the fundamental band ordering. A material whose indirect transition is quenched by mid-gap states remains an indirect-gap semiconductor; the PL data and the proposed mechanism therefore support a 'selective quenching' narrative, not an 'indirect-to-direct transition.' The Conclusion's phrase 'suggests a transition' is not warranted by either the experiment or the DFT.
  4. [Methods, Eqs. (1)–(3) and Fig. 4f] Equation (2) is written as E_ads = E_doped + (E_system + η_Cl μ_Cl). Under the stated definitions, exothermic adsorption corresponds to a negative E_ads, requiring E_ads = E_doped − E_system − η_Cl μ_Cl (or an equivalent convention). The reported adsorption energy of −1.9 eV for T3 and B3 is inconsistent with a literal reading of Eq. (2). Since the ordering of formation energies in Fig. 4f is central to the conclusion that substitutional doping is favored, the sign convention in Eq. (2) must be corrected and the reported values reconciled with the equations.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Figure 2] The text states that data points with error bars in Figures 3 and 4 represent averages, but Figure 2 shows no error bars; clearly specify which panels are averaged data and which are individual flakes, and define the error type.
  2. [Results and Discussion, bandgap assignments] The sentence 'The peak value for monolayer MoS2 occurs at approximately 655 nm' is inconsistent with the inset of Figure S1, which shows a bulk bandgap of 1.35 eV; please reconcile the peak labels across panels.
  3. [Computational Methods, Eqs. (2)–(3)] The chemical potentials are taken from Cl2 gas and α-S bulk; please justify that these gas/solid reference states appropriately describe the liquid DCE solution reaction environment, or discuss the inherent uncertainty this introduces into the formation-energy ordering.
  4. [Results and Discussion, Fig. 5] The manuscript repeatedly states that 'the indirect bandgap feature significantly diminishes upon vdW gap doping' but does not provide the numerical values of the calculated direct and indirect gaps; please list the bandgap values for all configurations, preferably in a table.
  5. [Figure 4 caption and text] The caption of Figure 4f calls the ordinate 'S-vacancy formation energy E_f', while the text calls it 'total formation energy E_form'; please use one notation consistently throughout.
  6. [Introduction, ref. 39] Reference 39 is cited for 'using varying molar concentrations of DCE solvent', but the cited paper reports FET characteristics; please verify that the molar-concentration claim is accurately attributed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the PL ratios and DFT band structures are independent measurements; the indirect-to-direct transition is an interpretive claim, not a definitional or fitted reduction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain has two independent legs. The PL leg measures intensity ratios R = I_doped/I_pristine before and after DCE treatment for direct and indirect peaks (Figs. 1-3); no parameter is fitted to these ratios, and the conclusion that the indirect transition is selectively suppressed is a direct reading of the measured ratios. The DFT leg computes formation energies (Eqs. 1-3) and band structures from first principles using stated chemical potentials for Cl2 and alpha-S; the mid-gap states are an output of the calculation, not a parameter chosen to match the PL ratios. There is no equation in which the predicted quantity is defined in terms of the input, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The paper cites prior work by some of its own authors (refs. 29-30) only as examples of post-growth optical/electrical modification techniques; these citations are not load-bearing for the central claim. The remaining weakness is inferential, not circular: the preserved direct PL peak and the suppressed indirect PL peak do not by themselves prove a reordering of the band extrema, and the paper's own DFT shows that the energetically favored substitutional Cl configurations (T3, B3) remain indirect, with the indirect-to-direct transition appearing only for the less favorable vdW-gap configuration. That is a support/validity concern about the title claim, not a reduction of the claim to its inputs. Therefore no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper does not fit free parameters to the PL data. Its central claims rest on standard DFT assumptions, on the interpretation of PL intensity changes, and on transferring gas-phase DFT chemical potentials to a liquid chemical reaction. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption PBE-GGA exchange-correlation functional gives reliable band structure and defect levels for MoS2.
    PBE is known to underestimate bandgaps and may misplace in-gap states; no hybrid or GW correction was used, so the quantitative positions of the mid-gap states are uncertain.
  • domain assumption PL peak intensity ratio is a direct proxy for the relative radiative recombination rate of each optical transition.
    The analysis assumes constant collection efficiency, no excitation change, and no spectral overlap issues; no calibration or lifetime data are given.
  • ad hoc to paper The chemical potential of Cl in Cl2 gas and S in alpha-S bulk describes the liquid DCE doping reaction.
    The experiment is a liquid soak, not a gas-phase equilibrium; the computed formation energies may not reflect the actual electrochemical environment.
  • ad hoc to paper The layer-thickness dependence indicates that Cl doping affects only the surface layers.
    This is an inference from the saturation of PL suppression with thickness; no depth-resolved measurement confirms it.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Chemical Treatment-Induced Indirect-to-Direct Bandgap Transition in MoS2: Impact on Optical Properties." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2JBHOOK5

@misc{pith2026250716574,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Chemical Treatment-Induced Indirect-to-Direct Bandgap Transition in MoS2: Impact on Optical Properties},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2JBHOOK5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.16574}
}
read the original abstract

The unique electrical and optical properties of emerging two-dimensional transition metal dichal-cogenides (TMDs) present compelling advantages over conventional semiconductors, including Si, Ge, and GaAs. Nevertheless, realising the full potential of TMDs in electronic and optoelectronic devices, such as transistors, light-emitting diodes (LEDs), and photodetectors, is con-strained by high contact resistance. This limitation arises from their low intrinsic carrier concen-trations and the current insufficiency of doping strategies for atomically thin materials. Notably, chemical treatment with 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE) has been demonstrated as an effective post-growth method to enhance the n-type electrical conductivity of TMDs. Despite the well-documented electrical improvements post-DCE treatment, its effects on optical properties, specifically the retention of optical characteristics and excitonic behaviour, are not yet clearly under-stood. Here, we systematically investigate the layer- and time-dependent optical effects of DCE on molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) using photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy and Density Functional Theory (DFT) simulations. Our PL results reveal a rapid reduction in the indirect bandgap transition, with the direct transition remaining unaffected. DFT confirms that chlorine (Cl) atoms bind to sulphur vacancies, creating mid-gap states that facilitate non-radiative recom-bination, explaining the observed indirect PL suppression. This work demonstrates DCE's utility not only for n-type doping but also for optical band structure engineering in MoS2 by selec-tively suppressing indirect transitions, potentially opening new avenues for 2D optoelectronic device design.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    & Wang, X

    Wang, J., Han, J., Chen, X. & Wang, X. Design strategies for two-dimensional material photodetectors to enhance device performance. InfoMat vol. 1 33–53 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1002/inf2.12004 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1002/inf2.12004 2019

  2. [2]

    Manzeli, S., Ovchinnikov, D., Pasquier, D., Yazyev, O. V. & Kis, A. 2D transition metal dichalcogenides. Nature Reviews Materials vol. 2 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2017.33 (2017)

    doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2017.33 2017

  3. [3]

    K., Lauhon, L

    Jariwala, D., Sangwan, V. K., Lauhon, L. J., Marks, T. J. & Hersam, M. C. Emerging device applications for semiconducting two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. ACS Nano vol. 8 1102–1120 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1021/nn500064s (2014)

    work page doi:10.1021/nn500064s 2014

  4. [4]

    Fiori, G. et al. Electronics based on two-dimensional materials. Nature Nanotechnology vol. 9 768–779 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2014.207 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.207 2014

  5. [5]

    Kuş, E. et al. A Dual-Channel MoS2-Based Selective Gas Sensor for Volatile Organic Compounds. Nanomaterials 14, (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    & Kis, A

    Radisavljevic, B., Radenovic, A., Brivio, J., Giacometti, V. & Kis, A. Single-layer MoS2 transistors. Nat Nanotechnol 6, 147–150 (2011)

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    H., Kalantar-Zadeh, K., Kis, A., Coleman, J

    Wang, Q. H., Kalantar-Zadeh, K., Kis, A., Coleman, J. N. & Strano, M. S. Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nature Nanotechnology vol. 7 699–712 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2012.193 (2012)

    doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.193 2012

  8. [8]

    H., Cain, J

    Chae, W. H., Cain, J. D., Hanson, E. D., Murthy, A. A. & Dravid, V. P. Substrate- induced strain and charge doping in CVD-grown monolayer MoS2. Appl Phys Lett 111, (2017)

    work page 2017

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Qiu, H. et al. Electrical characterization of back-gated bi-layer MoS 2 field-effect transistors and the effect of ambient on their performances. Appl Phys Lett 100, (2012)

    2012

  2. [10]

    Baugher, B. W. H., Churchill, H. O. H., Yang, Y. & Jarillo-Herrero, P. Intrinsic electronic transport properties of high-quality monolayer and bilayer MoS2. Nano Lett 13, 4212–4216 (2013)

    2013

  3. [11]

    Splendiani, A. et al. Emerging photoluminescence in monolayer MoS2. Nano Lett 10, 1271–1275 (2010)

    2010

  4. [12]

    & Tutuc, E

    Larentis, S., Fallahazad, B. & Tutuc, E. Field-effect transistors and intrinsic mobility in ultra-thin MoSe 2 layers. Appl Phys Lett 101, (2012)

    2012

  5. [13]

    Wang, H. et al. Integrated circuits based on bilayer MoS 2 transistors. Nano Lett 12, 4674–4680 (2012)

    2012

  6. [14]

    Liu, H. et al. Switching mechanism in single-layer molybdenum disulfide transistors: An insight into current flow across Schottky barriers. ACS Nano 8, 1031–1038 (2014)

    2014

  7. [15]

    Liu, W. et al. Role of metal contacts in designing high-performance monolayer n-type WSe2 field effect transistors. Nano Lett 13, 1983–1990 (2013)

    2013

  8. [16]

    Y., Penumatcha, A

    Das, S., Chen, H. Y., Penumatcha, A. V. & Appenzeller, J. High performance multilayer MoS2 transistors with scandium contacts. Nano Lett 13, 100–105 (2013)

    2013

  9. [17]

    Walia, S. et al. Characterization of metal contacts for two-dimensional MoS2 nanoflakes. Appl Phys Lett 103, (2013)

    2013

  10. [18]

    & Banerjee, K

    Kang, J., Liu, W. & Banerjee, K. High-performance MoS2 transistors with low- resistance molybdenum contacts. Appl Phys Lett 104, (2014)

    2014

  11. [19]

    T., Du, Y

    Liu, H., Neal, A. T., Du, Y. & Ye, P. D. (Invited) Fundamentals in MoS 2 Transistors: Dielectric, Scaling and Metal Contacts . ECS Trans 58, 203–208 (2013)

    2013

  12. [20]

    & Robertson, J

    Liu, D., Guo, Y., Fang, L. & Robertson, J. Sulfur vacancies in monolayer MoS2 and its electrical contacts. Appl Phys Lett 103, (2013)

    2013

  13. [21]

    McDonnell, S., Addou, R., Buie, C., Wallace, R. M. & Hinkle, C. L. Defect- DOMINATED DOPING and CONTACT RESISTANCE in MoS2. ACS Nano 8, 2880–2888 (2014)

    2014

  14. [22]

    & Eda, G

    Loh, L., Zhang, Z., Bosman, M. & Eda, G. Substitutional doping in 2D transition metal dichalcogenides. Nano Research vol. 14 1668–1681 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-020-3013-4 (2021)

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    & Chen, W

    Wang, Y., Zheng, Y., Han, C. & Chen, W. Surface charge transfer doping for two- dimensional semiconductor-based electronic and optoelectronic devices. Nano Research vol. 14 1682–1697 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-020-2919-1 (2021)

    2021 doi

  16. [24]

    Luo, P. et al. Doping engineering and functionalization of two-dimensional metal chalcogenides. Nanoscale Horizons vol. 4 26–51 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1039/c8nh00150b (2019)

    2019 doi

  17. [25]

    Pham, V. P. & Yeom, G. Y. Recent Advances in Doping of Molybdenum Disulfide: Industrial Applications and Future Prospects. Advanced Materials vol. 28 9024–9059 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201506402 (2016)

    2016 doi

  18. [26]

    Qu, D. et al. Carrier-Type Modulation and Mobility Improvement of Thin MoTe2. Advanced Materials 29, (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    Miao, J. et al. A ‘click’ Reaction to Engineer MoS2Field-Effect Transistors with Low Contact Resistance. ACS Nano 16, 20647–20655 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    Liu, K. et al. Approaching ohmic contact to two-dimensional semiconductors. Science Bulletin vol. 64 1426–1435 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2019.06.021 (2019)

    2019 doi

  21. [29]

    Sarcan, F. et al. Understanding the impact of heavy ions and tailoring the optical properties of large-area monolayer WS2 using focused ion beam. NPJ 2D Mater Appl 7, (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    Sarcan, F. et al. Ultraviolet-Ozone Treatment: An Effective Method for Fine-Tuning Optical and Electrical Properties of Suspended and Substrate-Supported MoS2. Nanomaterials 13, (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Luo, T. et al. Electron beam lithography induced doping in multilayer MoTe2. Appl Surf Sci 540, (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    Amani, M. et al. High Luminescence Efficiency in MoS2 Grown by Chemical Vapor Deposition. ACS Nano 10, 6535–6541 (2016)

    2016

  25. [33]

    W., Elahi, E., Amin, A., Hussain, G

    Iqbal, M. W., Elahi, E., Amin, A., Hussain, G. & Aftab, S. Chemical doping of transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs) based field effect transistors: A review. Superlattices and Microstructures vol. 137 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2019.106350 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    S., Lee, M., Ngo, T

    Choi, M. S., Lee, M., Ngo, T. D., Hone, J. & Yoo, W. J. Chemical Dopant-Free Doping by Annealing and Electron Beam Irradiation on 2D Materials. Adv Electron Mater 7, (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    Neupane, G. P. et al. Simple Chemical Treatment to n-Dope Transition-Metal Dichalcogenides and Enhance the Optical and Electrical Characteristics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9, 11950–11958 (2017)

    2017

  28. [36]

    Kim, Y. et al. Plasma functionalization for cyclic transition between neutral and charged excitons in monolayer MoS2. Sci Rep 6, (2016)

    2016

  29. [37]

    Yang, L. et al. Chloride molecular doping technique on 2D materials: WS2 and MoS2. Nano Lett 14, 6275–6280 (2014)

    2014

  30. [38]

    & Mondal, B

    Roy, A., Sharma, S. & Mondal, B. Effect of n-type Cl doping on electrical conductivity of few layer WS2. Microsystem Technologies (2024) doi:10.1007/s00542-024-05683- 2

    2024 doi

  31. [39]

    & Kim, E

    Kim, T., Kim, Y. & Kim, E. K. Characteristics of Cl-doped MoS2 field-effect transistors. Sens Actuators A Phys 312, (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    Novoselov, K. S. et al. Two-dimensional atomic crystals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102, 10451–10453 (2005)

    2005

  33. [41]

    Giannozzi, P. et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: A modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. Journal of Physics Condensed Matter 21, (2009)

    2009

  34. [42]

    Giannozzi, P. et al. Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with Quantum ESPRESSO. Journal of Physics Condensed Matter 29, (2017)

    2017

  35. [43]

    & Joubert, D

    Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented- wave method. Phys Rev B 59, 1758–1775 (1999)

    1999

  36. [44]

    E., Först, C

    Blöchl, P. E., Först, C. J. & Schimpl, J. The Projector Augmented Wave Method: Ab- Initio Molecular Dynamics with Full Wave Functions. (2002)

    2002

  37. [45]

    P., Burke, K

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys Rev Lett 77, 3865–3868 (1996)

    1996

  38. [46]

    Ostadhossein, A. et al. ReaxFF Reactive Force-Field Study of Molybdenum Disulfide (MoS2). J Phys Chem Lett 8, 631–640 (2017)

    2017

  39. [47]

    & Izumi, F

    Momma, K. & Izumi, F. VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data. J Appl Crystallogr 44, 1272–1276 (2011)

    2011

  40. [48]

    F., Lee, C., Hone, J., Shan, J

    Mak, K. F., Lee, C., Hone, J., Shan, J. & Heinz, T. F. Atomically thin MoS2: A new direct-gap semiconductor. Phys Rev Lett 105, (2010). Supplemental Material for Chemical Treatment-Induced Indirect-to-Direct Bandgap Transition in MoS₂: Impact on Optical Properties Yusuf Kerem ...

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.