Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Collective synchrony in confluent, pulsatile epithelia

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Epithelial monolayers display synchronized expansion–contraction oscillations whose phase persistence peaks at intermediate cell density and increases with malignancy.

desk verdict A useful new phase-based metric for tissue synchrony, with a non-monotonic density trend that is experimentally plausible but whose model support is partly circular. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.16772 v1 pith:P2TR4NZU submitted 2025-07-22 cond-mat.soft

Wenhui Tang , Mehrana R. Nejad , Adrian F. Pegoraro , L. Mahadevan , Ming Guo This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.soft
keywords collectivecellmigrationepithelialmonolayervelocitydivergencedilatationalmodesphasesynchronizationtopologicaldefectscomplexGinzburg-Landaumodeljammingtransition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that the expansion–contraction cycles in confluent epithelial monolayers, measured through the divergence of the cell velocity field, are not random fluctuations but coherent, large-scale oscillations. The temporal persistence of these oscillations is non-monotonic in cell density: it grows with density, peaks near the glass-transition density, and then declines as cells become caged. The same density trend appears in the spatial velocity correlation length and in the density of topological defects in the oscillation phase, implying a shared physical origin. The paper further shows that more invasive breast cancer cell lines exhibit longer phase persistence and fewer defects, suggesting that temporal coherence tracks malignant potential. A continuum model coupling cell density to a complex Ginzburg-Landau field reproduces the observed trends when the model's phase diffusivity is set by the experimental correlation length.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the phase of the divergence field, $\varphi(x,t)$, defined from the Gaussian-filtered, detrended divergence $\mathrm{Div}^*$ via $\varphi = \tan^{-1}(\mathrm{Div}^*(x,t), \mathrm{Div}^*(x,t+\tau))$, where $\tau$ is one quarter of the local oscillation period; topological defects in this phase carry winding numbers $\pm 1$ and appear and annihilate in pairs. The mechanism that explains the observations is the coupled density–CGL system of Eqs. (1)–(3): a diffusive density field responds to the active oscillatory stress, while the phase and amplitude of the oscillation evolve under a complex Ginzburg-Landau dynamics with density-dependent feedback. The key feedback is that local density adapts to the phase pattern, $\rho \approx \rho_0 + \epsilon \cos\theta$, which reinforces temporal coherence and shortens the period up to a critical density, beyond which cell caging destroys synchrony.

What would settle it

Measure phase persistence time $t_0$ in a confluent MDCK monolayer of fixed density while modulating cell–cell adhesion (e.g., E-cadherin inhibition) to change the velocity correlation length $\zeta_{rr}$ without changing density. The density–phase feedback model predicts that $t_0$ should track $\zeta_{rr}$; if $t_0$ remains fixed while $\zeta_{rr}$ changes, the coupling is wrong. Alternatively, solve Eqs. (1)–(3) with a density-independent $\Gamma$; if the non-monotonic peak in the average period and defect density persists, the model's explanation of the turnover as arising from the density-dependent interaction lengthscale would be disproved.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the phase field of the velocity divergence, $\varphi(x,t) = \tan^{-1}(\mathrm{Div}^*(x,t), \mathrm{Div}^*(x,t+\tau))$, displays robust spatiotemporal order in confluent epithelia. Phase persistence time $t_0$, defined as the zero-crossing of the phase autocorrelation, initially increases with density, reaches a maximum at about $1700$–$1800~\mathrm{mm}^{-2}$, and then falls, mirroring the non-monotonic velocity correlation length and the inverse trend in phase-defect density. The continuum theory, in which a complex Ginzburg-Landau order parameter for the oscillations is coupled to cell density, reproduces this non-monotonic period and defect-density behavior when the phase diffusivity $\Gamma(\rho_0)$ is fitted to the measured correlation length. In six breast cancer cell lines of increasing invasiveness, phase persistence time increases and defect density decreases, indicating that highly malignant lines maintain more temporally coherent dilatational oscillations.

Load-bearing premise

The model's phase diffusivity $\Gamma(\rho_0)$ is fitted to the experimentally measured velocity correlation length squared, so the simulations inherit the experimental spatial lengthscale; the reproduced non-monotonic period and defect densities are therefore not independent predictions of the theory.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Phase persistence time, computed from time-lapse imaging of nuclei or phase contrast, provides a temporal readout of the glass or jamming transition in epithelial layers, complementing spatial velocity correlation measurements.
  • The density and speed of topological defects in the divergence phase field are candidate quantitative biomarkers for invasive potential in breast cancer cell lines.
  • The density–phase feedback implies that interventions that change the spatial correlation length of cell motion—such as altering cell–cell adhesion or substrate stiffness—will shift the density at which synchrony peaks.
  • The model's prediction of a period increase below the transition and decrease above it can be tested against the measured quarter-period distributions reported in the paper.
  • Because defects localize at zero-divergence boundaries, topological defect dynamics in the phase field offer a way to track and predict the motion of sources and sinks in expanding tissues.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the model inherits its spatial lengthscale from the fitted $\Gamma(\rho_0)$, an independent test would be to vary the interaction lengthscale pharmacologically at fixed density; the density–phase feedback predicts phase persistence should track the lengthscale, not density alone.
  • The increase in phase persistence with malignancy, combined with the density turnover, suggests that invasive lines may behave as if they sit below their effective glass-transition density even at matched cell counts, a hypothesis that could be tested by measuring the velocity cross-correlation length in the same panel.
  • The same phase-analysis pipeline could be applied to synthetic active matter, such as pulsatile colloidal or microbial systems, to ask whether density-coupled complex Ginzburg-Landau dynamics is a generic route to synchrony in active fluids.
  • The correlation between cooperative cell pack size and phase persistence implies that temporal coherence could serve as an early indicator of collective invasion onset before spatial jamming signatures become apparent.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental and theoretical study of dilatational oscillations in confluent epithelia. Using MDCK monolayers, the authors compute the divergence of the velocity field, extract a local phase from the detrended divergence signal, and observe large-scale synchronized oscillations with topological defects. They report that phase persistence time and oscillation period increase with density up to roughly 1700–1800 cells/mm² and then decrease, while phase-defect density shows the opposite trend. A complex-Ginzburg-Landau-type continuum model coupling a complex oscillatory field to cell density (Eqs. 1–3) is introduced, and with the phase diffusion coefficient Γ(ρ0) fitted to the experimental squared velocity correlation length, the model reproduces the non-monotonic period and defect density. Reanalysis of six breast cancer cell lines reports longer phase persistence and fewer defects with increasing invasiveness.

Significance. If the experimental observations hold, the phase-based temporal analysis of dilatational modes offers an accessible, quantitative probe of collective tissue state and may track the glass transition and malignancy. The experimental phase extraction is carefully cross-checked (Hilbert phase, kymographs, autocorrelations), and the defect dynamics show charge-conserving pair creation/annihilation. The model is minimal and the fitting procedure is disclosed in the SI. The main limitation is that the model validation is currently a consistency check rather than an independent test: the non-monotonic spatial lengthscale is inserted through Γ(ρ0), so the reproduced temporal trends do not by themselves confirm the proposed density-phase feedback mechanism.

major comments (3)
  1. [SI S1.3, Eqs. (2)–(3), Fig. 3d–e] The claim that the simulations support a density-phase feedback mechanism is not established by the present simulations. As stated in SI S1.3, Γ(ρ0) is obtained by fitting quadratic branches to the experimental squared velocity correlation length (R²=0.95), and Γ is the diffusion coefficient of the phase and amplitude in Eqs. (2)–(3); it directly sets the spatial pattern size, defect spacing, and the phase-gradient contribution to the period. Feeding a non-monotonic Γ(ρ0) into the CGL system and recovering non-monotonic period and defect density in Fig. 3d–e therefore demonstrates consistency, not independent prediction. Please provide control simulations with a density-independent Γ (e.g., the value at the turnover density) and with ϵ=χ=0 while retaining the fitted Γ(ρ0), and report whether the period and defect-density turnover survives; without such controls, the non-monotonicity in Fig. 3d–e is attributable to the injected lengthscale rather than to local density-phase feedback.
  2. [Fig. 2, Methods (MDCK cells imaging)] The central experimental result that synchrony is non-monotonic in density is derived from a single developing MDCK monolayer in which density increases over time (Fig. 2d inset). The text reports no biological replicates or error bars for the persistence time, period, velocity correlation length, or defect density in Fig. 2f–h, so time-dependent aging and density are conflated. Please add independent experiments at several fixed densities (or at least multiple developing monolayers) and report replicate statistics; without this, the non-monotonic trend cannot be distinguished from an artifact of monolayer development.
  3. [Eqs. (4)–(5)] The analytical argument after Eqs. (4)–(5) claims that density adapts to phase patterns and thereby reduces the period, but that argument is made for a simplified system in which the phase equation contains no spatial coupling and assumes the diffusive density relaxation is fast enough to set ρ=ρ0+ϵ cosθ. It does not produce the observed maximum in period at intermediate density; the maximum in Fig. 3d is instead inherited from the fitted Γ(ρ0). The manuscript should either derive the non-monotonic period from the feedback terms alone or explicitly state that the model's non-monotonicity is imposed by the experimental input.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 3 caption] The Fig. 3 caption labels both the average-period panel and the defect-density panel as 'd'; relabel the defect-density panel as 'e'.
  2. [Paragraph introducing Eqs. (1)–(3)] In the sentence introducing the amplitude, 'amplitude Ax, t)' should read 'amplitude A(x, t)'.
  3. [Methods, Phase Auto-correlation] The estimator of persistence time differs between the developing-epithelia data (zero crossing of a fit to the first five points) and the cancer-cell data; please state the same estimator for both or justify the difference.
  4. [Fig. 4] The error bars in Fig. 4 are standard deviations over time; please state the number of independent fields/movies per cell line and whether any biological replicates were used.
  5. [Supplementary Fig. S3 and Fig. 2b] The text says τ does not vary significantly with position, yet Fig. 2b shows a spatial colormap of τ; clarify whether this colormap uses the local τ or the spatially averaged value.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Model 'validation' is partially circular: Γ(ρ0) is fit to the experimental correlation length, so the reproduced spatial length is by construction and the non-monotonic period/defect trends are not independent evidence for density-phase feedback.

  1. fitted input called prediction [SI S1.3; main text after Eqs. (4)-(5); Fig. 3d-e]
    "To explore any correlation between the spatial and temporal patterns, we use the non-monotonic behavior of spatial correlation of velocity as a function of density, derived from experiments and also observed in other studies [10, 12], into the dynamics of the complex field in Eqs. (2) and (3) and measure the average period of the oscillations. ... We next solve Eqs. (S15)-(S17) numerically and find the average phase spatial correlation length, average oscillation period, and average defect density as a function of cell density, as shown in Fig. 3c-e."

    Because Γ(ρ0) is fit to the experimental squared velocity correlation length and is the only density-dependent input in Eqs. (2)-(3), the 'confirmation' of correlated temporal trends is not an independent test of the density-phase feedback mechanism. The Laplacian terms multiplied by Γ set the pattern size; without a control using density-independent Γ (or ϵ=χ=0), the period peak and defect-density minimum in Fig. 3d-e can be inherited from the injected lengthscale rather than produced by the ϵ/χ coupling. The abstract's claim that simulations 'reveal' local density adapting to phase patterns is thus underdetermined by the simulation.

  2. self definitional [Fig. 3 caption]
    "We fitted quadratic functions to the square of the velocity correlation length from experiments for densities below and above the transition density ρ0 = 1 to determine the functional form of Γ(ρ0) as a function of ρ0 and considered Γ to be proportional to the fit with a proportionality constant Γ0 (see Section S1.3 in the SI). The simulation results shown here yield a spatial correlation consistent with experimental observations."

    The simulated phase correlation length in Fig. 3c is presented as being 'consistent with experimental observations' after Γ(ρ0) was fitted to those same experimental correlation-length data. The spatial lengthscale output is therefore equivalent to the input by construction and cannot serve as validation of the model's spatial predictions.

full rationale

The experimental phenomenology is self-contained: phase autocorrelation, persistence times, defect densities, and the cancer-cell comparisons are measured directly and do not depend on the model. The circularity is confined to the model-validation chain. The model's only density-dependent input is Γ(ρ0), fitted to the experimental squared velocity correlation length with R²=0.95 (SI S1.3); this coefficient multiplies the Laplacians in Eqs. (2)-(3) and thereby sets the phase-pattern lengthscale. Reproducing that lengthscale (Fig. 3c) is a fit, not a prediction. The non-monotonic period and defect density (Fig. 3d-e) are genuine simulation outputs, but because no density-independent-Γ control or ϵ=χ=0 control is reported, the paper cannot exclude that these trends are inherited from the fitted Γ(ρ0) rather than generated by the density-phase feedback that the abstract highlights. This is a partial circularity (score 6): the central mechanistic attribution is underdetermined by the simulation, even though the experimental results stand. No load-bearing self-citation or imported uniqueness theorem is involved.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a phenomenological continuum model with several hand-set coefficients, one fitted density-dependent function Γ(ρ0), and domain assumptions about the dominance of dilatational modes. No new physical entities are introduced; the complex oscillatory field G is a collective variable rather than a new particle or force.

free parameters (7)
  • Γ0 = 5e-5
    Proportionality constant for the phase diffusion coefficient Γ(ρ0); sets the overall magnitude of spatial coupling in simulations.
  • Γ(ρ0) functional form = Γ0(3.9ρ0^2 - 4.7ρ0 + 2.6) for ρ0<1; 2.6Γ0(1 - 0.3ρ0) for ρ0>1
    Fitted to the squared experimental velocity correlation length as a function of density with R²=0.95 (SI S1.3). This is the main density-dependent input to the model and drives the non-monotonic pattern size.
  • α = 0.1
    Density diffusion coefficient in Eq. (1); chosen by hand for the simulations.
  • ϵ = 0.7 to 1
    Coupling strength between the oscillatory field and density; chosen by hand, with a stated range.
  • χ = 1e-4
    Coupling of density on the amplitude of the oscillatory field in Eq. (3); chosen by hand.
  • γ = 1e-3
    Rate multiplying the phase-density coupling term in Eq. (2); chosen by hand.
  • Ω = 1
    Intrinsic oscillation frequency in the complex Ginzburg-Landau model; chosen by hand, with the requirement that it be large.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The velocity gradient is dominated by the dilatational component, so shear and vorticity can be neglected.
    Results and SI S1.1 justify this with the coefficient of variation comparison, but the model then takes the stress tensor as isotropic (σ ~ I).
  • domain assumption The epithelial monolayer is near a Hopf bifurcation and can be described by a complex Ginzburg-Landau order parameter with a single natural frequency.
    Eqs. (2)-(3); the text states these describe 'spatio-temporal oscillations near a Hopf bifurcation'.
  • domain assumption Local density dynamics obeys a diffusion equation driven by active contractility variations.
    Eq. (1) is a phenomenological diffusion equation; it is not derived from force balance or cell-level rules.
  • domain assumption The phase estimated from zero-crossing quarter period with spatially averaged τ is a faithful local phase.
    Methods and Fig. S3-S4; Hilbert phase confirms consistency, but the zero-crossing method is heuristic and depends on the Gaussian filter width.
  • ad hoc to paper Higher-order symmetry-allowed terms in the general model can be set to zero to reduce to the equations of Ref. [22].
    SI S1.2 sets a3=b4=b7=b8=b9=0 to match the earlier pulsatile-active-liquids model; this is a simplicity choice, not a derived result.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Collective synchrony in confluent, pulsatile epithelia." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P2TR4NZU

@misc{pith2026250716772,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Collective synchrony in confluent, pulsatile epithelia},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P2TR4NZU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.16772}
}
read the original abstract

Collective cell migration lies at the intersection of developmental biology and non-equilibrium physics, where active processes give rise to emergent patterns that are biologically relevant. Here, we investigate dilatational modes--cycles of expansion and contraction--in epithelial monolayers, and show that the divergence of the velocity field exhibits robust, large-scale temporal oscillations. These oscillatory patterns, reminiscent of excitable media and their biological analogs, emerge spontaneously from the coupled dynamics of actively pulsing cells. We find that the temporal persistence of these oscillations varies non-monotonically with cell density: synchrony initially increases with density, reaches a maximum at intermediate densities and is lost at higher values. This trend mirrors changes in the spatial correlation length of cell-cell interactions, and the density of topological defects in the system, suggesting a shared physical origin. We develop a continuum model in which a complex-valued Ginzburg-Landau-type field that governs the amplitude and phase of oscillations is coupled to local cell density. Simulations reproduce the observed behavior, revealing that local density adapts to phase patterns, reinforcing temporal coherence up to a critical density, and variations in the density of topological defects as a function of cell density. Extending our analysis to breast cancer cell lines with increasing invasiveness, we find that malignant cells exhibit longer phase persistence and fewer topological defects, suggesting a mechanistic link between temporal coherence and metastatic potential. Together, these results highlight the role of density-dependent synchrony dynamics as a fundamental, quantifiable mode of collective behavior in active epithelial matter, with implications for morphogenesis, cancer progression, and tissue diagnostics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.16772 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Emergence of large-scale oscillatory patterns in MDCK cells on a flat surface. a, NLS-GFP labeled cell nuclei. b, A snapshot of cell velocity calculated from nuclei displacement in consecutive frames. The length of velocity vectors is scaled with the velocity magnitude; Scale bar: 20 µm/hr. c, Velocity divergence ∇ · v colormap. d, Left: velocity divergence variation in time for all the pixels along the dashed line … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Cell density affects temporal oscillations in developing MDCK cells. a, Phase contrast images of the monolayer as density increases during 30 hr (from left to right). b, Spatial colormap of τ , where τ is one quarter of divergence oscillation period. Scale bars in a-b: 50µm. c, Kymographs of the phase ϕ for divergence along x1, x2, x3, x4, x5 in a. Time interval between two frames is 3 minutes. d, Cell speed decreas… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Continuum model recapitulates the non-monotonic temporal trend as a func￾tion of density when inputting the spatial interaction length scale. a, Snapshots of simula￾tions for various initial densities ρ0. Increasing the initial density first increases and then decreases the pattern size in the phase. The scale bar represents 15 simulation grid units. +1 (−1) phase defects are shown in black (white). b, Top (bottom) … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The phase dynamics of divergence in breast cancer cell lines with increasing invasive potential at constant density. a, Phase contrast images of breast cancer cell lines at constant density (1900 − 2000)mm−2 with increasing invasive potential: 10A, 10.Vector, 10a.14-3-…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Topology of pulsating active matter: Defect asymmetry controls emergent motility

    cond-mat.soft 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Defect motility in pulsating active matter arises from a ratchet effect of asymmetric rotating cores, regulating the spiral-to-fiber wave crossover.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Flocking and giant fluctuations in epithelial active solids

    Yuan Shen et al. “Flocking and giant fluctuations in epithelial active solids”. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 122.16 (2025), e2421327122

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    Active wetting of epithelial tissues

    Carlos P´ erez-Gonz´ alez et al. “Active wetting of epithelial tissues”. In: Nature physics 15.1 (2019), pp. 79–88. 9

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Real-time quantification of endothelial response to shear stress and vascular modulators

    Jackson G DeStefano et al. “Real-time quantification of endothelial response to shear stress and vascular modulators”. In: Integrative Biology 9.4 (2017), pp. 362–374

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Interplay between mechanochem- ical patterning and glassy dynamics in cellular monolayers

    Daniel Boocock, Tsuyoshi Hirashima, and Edouard Hannezo. “Interplay between mechanochem- ical patterning and glassy dynamics in cellular monolayers”. In:PRX Life 1.1 (2023), p. 013001

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Long-range ordered vorticity patterns in living tissue induced by cell division

    Ninna S Rossen et al. “Long-range ordered vorticity patterns in living tissue induced by cell division”. In: Nature communications 5.1 (2014), p. 5720

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    Collective cell guidance by cooperative intercellular forces

    Dhananjay T Tambe et al. “Collective cell guidance by cooperative intercellular forces”. In: Nature materials 10.6 (2011), pp. 469–475

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    Mechanical waves during tissue expansion

    Xavier Serra-Picamal et al. “Mechanical waves during tissue expansion”. In: Nature Physics 8.8 (2012), pp. 628–634

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Sustained oscillations of epithelial cell sheets

    Gr´ egoire Peyret et al. “Sustained oscillations of epithelial cell sheets”. In: Biophysical journal 117.3 (2019), pp. 464–478

    work page 2019

Show all 37 references
  1. [9]

    Collective rotational motion of freely expanding T84 epithelial cell colonies

    Flora Ascione et al. “Collective rotational motion of freely expanding T84 epithelial cell colonies”. In: J. R. Soc. Interface 20.199 (2023), p. 20220719

    2023

  2. [10]

    Glass-like dynamics of collective cell migration

    Thomas E Angelini et al. “Glass-like dynamics of collective cell migration”. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108.12 (2011), pp. 4714–4719

    2011

  3. [11]

    Motility-driven glass and jamming transitions in biological tissues

    Dapeng Bi et al. “Motility-driven glass and jamming transitions in biological tissues”. In: Physical Review X 6.2 (2016), p. 021011

    2016

  4. [12]

    Physics of active jamming during collective cellular motion in a mono- layer

    Simon Garcia et al. “Physics of active jamming during collective cellular motion in a mono- layer”. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112.50 (2015), pp. 15314–15319

    2015

  5. [13]

    Dynamics of supercooled liquids and the glass transition

    Ulf Bengtzelius, W Gotze, and A Sjolander. “Dynamics of supercooled liquids and the glass transition”. In: Journal of Physics C: solid state Physics 17.33 (1984), p. 5915

    1984

  6. [14]

    Heterogeneity at the glass transition: a review

    Hans Sillescu. “Heterogeneity at the glass transition: a review”. In: Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 243.2-3 (1999), pp. 81–108

    1999

  7. [15]

    Dynamic heterogeneity at the experimen- tal glass transition predicted by transferable machine learning

    Gerhard Jung, Giulio Biroli, and Ludovic Berthier. “Dynamic heterogeneity at the experimen- tal glass transition predicted by transferable machine learning”. In: Physical Review B 109.6 (2024), p. 064205

    2024

  8. [16]

    In vivo modulation of morphogenetic movements in Drosophila embryos with femtosecond laser pulses

    Willy Supatto et al. “In vivo modulation of morphogenetic movements in Drosophila embryos with femtosecond laser pulses”. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102.4 (2005), pp. 1047–1052

    2005

  9. [17]

    Strain maps characterize the symmetry of convergence and extension patterns during zebrafish gastrulation

    Dipanjan Bhattacharya et al. “Strain maps characterize the symmetry of convergence and extension patterns during zebrafish gastrulation”. In: Scientific reports 11.1 (2021), p. 19357

    2021

  10. [18]

    Reconstruction and deconstruction of human somitogenesis in vitro

    Yuchuan Miao et al. “Reconstruction and deconstruction of human somitogenesis in vitro”. In: Nature 614.7948 (2023), pp. 500–508

    2023

  11. [19]

    Topological turbulence in the membrane of a living cell

    Tzer Han Tan et al. “Topological turbulence in the membrane of a living cell”. In: Nature Physics 16.6 (2020), pp. 657–662

    2020

  12. [20]

    Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data

    Kenneth A Norman et al. “Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data”. In: Trends in cognitive sciences 10.9 (2006), pp. 424–430

    2006

  13. [21]

    Spatial and temporal organization during cardiac fibrillation

    Richard A Gray, Arkady M Pertsov, and Jos´ e Jalife. “Spatial and temporal organization during cardiac fibrillation”. In: Nature 392.6671 (1998), pp. 75–78

    1998

  14. [22]

    Hydrodynamics of pulsating active liquids

    Tirthankar Banerjee et al. “Hydrodynamics of pulsating active liquids”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.19955 (2024). 10

    2024

  15. [23]

    The world of the complex Ginzburg-Landau equation

    Igor S Aranson and Lorenz Kramer. “The world of the complex Ginzburg-Landau equation”. In: Reviews of modern physics 74.1 (2002), p. 99

    2002

  16. [24]

    Unjamming and collective migration in MCF10A breast cancer cell lines

    Jae Hun Kim et al. “Unjamming and collective migration in MCF10A breast cancer cell lines”. In: Biochemical and biophysical research communications 521.3 (2020), pp. 706–715

    2020

  17. [25]

    14-3-3 ζ cooperates with ErbB2 to promote ductal carcinoma in situ progression to invasive breast cancer by inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition

    Jing Lu et al. “14-3-3 ζ cooperates with ErbB2 to promote ductal carcinoma in situ progression to invasive breast cancer by inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition”. In: Cancer cell 16.3 (2009), pp. 195–207

    2009

  18. [26]

    Malignant MCF10CA1 cell lines derived from premalignant human breast epithelial MCF10AT cells

    Steven J Santner et al. “Malignant MCF10CA1 cell lines derived from premalignant human breast epithelial MCF10AT cells”. In:Breast cancer research and treatment65 (2001), pp. 101– 110

    2001

  19. [27]

    MCF10AT: a model for the evolution of cancer from proliferative breast disease

    Peter J Dawson et al. “MCF10AT: a model for the evolution of cancer from proliferative breast disease”. In: The American journal of pathology 148.1 (1996), p. 313

    1996

  20. [28]

    Increasingly transformed MCF-10A cells have a progressively tumor-like phenotype in three-dimensional basement membrane culture

    Karen M Imbalzano et al. “Increasingly transformed MCF-10A cells have a progressively tumor-like phenotype in three-dimensional basement membrane culture”. In: Cancer cell in- ternational 9 (2009), pp. 1–11

    2009

  21. [29]

    Cell–cell adhesion and 3D matrix confinement determine jamming transitions in breast cancer invasion

    Olga Ilina et al. “Cell–cell adhesion and 3D matrix confinement determine jamming transitions in breast cancer invasion”. In: Nature cell biology 22.9 (2020), pp. 1103–1115

    2020

  22. [30]

    Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition is not required for lung metastasis but contributes to chemoresistance

    Kari R Fischer et al. “Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition is not required for lung metastasis but contributes to chemoresistance”. In: Nature 527.7579 (2015), pp. 472–476

    2015

  23. [31]

    Classifying collective cancer cell invasion

    Peter Friedl et al. “Classifying collective cancer cell invasion”. In: Nature cell biology 14.8 (2012), pp. 777–783

    2012

  24. [32]

    Cancer cell migration: integrated roles of matrix mechanics and trans- forming potential

    Erin L Baker et al. “Cancer cell migration: integrated roles of matrix mechanics and trans- forming potential”. In: PLoS One 6.5 (2011), e20355

    2011

  25. [33]

    Transforming potential and matrix stiffness co-regulate confinement sensitivity of tumor cell migration

    Amit Pathak and Sanjay Kumar. “Transforming potential and matrix stiffness co-regulate confinement sensitivity of tumor cell migration”. In: Integrative Biology 5.8 (2013), pp. 1067– 1075

    2013

  26. [34]

    Differential expression of key signaling proteins in MCF10 cell lines, a human breast cancer progression model

    Jae Young So et al. “Differential expression of key signaling proteins in MCF10 cell lines, a human breast cancer progression model”. In: Molecular and cellular pharmacology 4.1 (2012), p. 31

    2012

  27. [35]

    Multicellular density fluctuations in epithelial monolayers

    Steven M Zehnder et al. “Multicellular density fluctuations in epithelial monolayers”. In: Phys- ical Review E 92.3 (2015), p. 032729

    2015

  28. [36]

    Collective curvature sensing and fluidity in three-dimensional multicellular systems

    Wenhui Tang et al. “Collective curvature sensing and fluidity in three-dimensional multicellular systems”. In: Nature Physics 18.11 (2022), pp. 1371–1378

    2022

  29. [37]

    Stress-shape misalignment in confluent cell layers

    Mehrana R Nejad et al. “Stress-shape misalignment in confluent cell layers”. In: Nature Com- munications 15.1 (2024), p. 3628. 11 12 Figures Figure 1: Emergence of large-scale oscillatory patterns in MDCK cells on a flat surface. a, NLS-GFP labeled cell nuclei. b, A snapshot o...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.