Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 42 references

Supercurrents and (Partial) Supersymmetry in Adjoint QCD$_2$ and Its Generalizations

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Adjoint QCD2 is exactly supersymmetric at one special fermion mass, and the paper constructs the conserved supercurrent that realizes it.

desk verdict A solid covariant proof of the known supersymmetry in adjoint QCD2, with a new gapless fully supersymmetric model whose key cancellation is asserted, not shown. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.17138 v3 pith:DUHULUNS submitted 2025-07-23 hep-th

Igor R. Klebanov , Silviu S. Pufu , Benjamin S{o}gaard , Edward Witten This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords adjointQCD2supercurrentN=(11)supersymmetrycompositeoperatoranomalyMajoranafermionscosetCFTpartialtwo-dimensionalgaugetheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

In $1+1$ dimensions, $SU(N)$ gauge theory coupled to one adjoint Majorana fermion -- the theory known as adjoint QCD$_2$ -- has a long history as a tractable model of confinement and string formation. The paper establishes that at the particular fermion mass $m = \sqrt{g^2 N/(2\pi)}$ the theory is exactly $\mathcal{N}=(1,1)$ supersymmetric, and it proves this by writing down a conserved, gauge-invariant, Lorentz-covariant supercurrent whose conservation forces exactly that mass. Conservation works only because of a quantum anomaly: derivatives of composite operators made from the fermion fields pick up extra field-strength terms with coefficient $N$, and balancing those terms fixes both $m$ and the supercurrent normalization. The construction extends to theories with additional massless fermions, where the mass becomes $\sqrt{g^2(N+k)/(2\pi)}$ and the supersymmetry is generally partial, acting on a massive sector while a separate conformal-field-theory sector is not supersymmetric; for special matter content, including an example with three adjoint fermions, the full gapless theory is supersymmetric.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the gauge-invariant supercurrent ansatz $j_{\mu A}$, made of the fermion cubic terms $\operatorname{tr}\psi_\pm^3$ and field-strength--fermion terms $\alpha\operatorname{tr}(\psi_\pm F)$, together with the composite-operator anomaly identities (2.17) and (2.19). These identities say that when two adjoint operators have a singular operator product expansion, the derivative of their gauge-invariant point-split product acquires an extra term proportional to $N$ times the field strength times the operator-product coefficient; the factor $N$ comes from the adjoint Wilson line used in the point-splitting regulator. The supercurrent conservation equations then reduce to algebraic conditions that fix $\alpha$ and $m$, and the same anomaly input controls the supercurrent-multiplet commutators and the supersymmetric stress tensor in the generalized models.

What would settle it

Compute the divergence of the proposed supercurrent in an independent regularization, for instance a Hamiltonian lattice discretization of adjoint QCD$_2$ at finite $N$, at $m=\sqrt{g^2 N/(2\pi)}$; if $\partial_+ j_{--}+\partial_- j_{+-}$ does not vanish, or if the equal-time algebra $\{Q_-,Q_-\}=(N/(8\pi))P_-$ and $\{Q_+,Q_+\}=(N/(8\pi))P_+$ fails, the exact supersymmetry at this mass is refuted. The most direct target is the anomaly coefficient in $D_+ J_- = -(m/\sqrt{2})(\psi_+\psi_-+\psi_-\psi_+) - (N/(4\pi))F$: a measurement that differs from $N/(4\pi)$ would invalidate the mass formula.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that two-dimensional adjoint QCD has a quantum-conserved supercurrent of the explicit form $j_{--}=\frac{1}{3}\operatorname{tr}\psi_-^3$, $j_{+-}=\alpha\operatorname{tr}(\psi_+ F)$, $j_{++}=\frac{1}{3}\operatorname{tr}\psi_+^3$, $j_{-+}=\alpha\operatorname{tr}(\psi_- F)$, with $\alpha=\sqrt{N/(4\pi g^2)}$, precisely when $m=\sqrt{g^2 N/(2\pi)}$. The supercurrent is built from composite operators whose naive derivatives receive anomaly terms from the Wilson-line point-splitting regulator; requiring $\partial_+ j_{--}+\partial_- j_{+-}=0$ forces two equations, $\alpha m/\sqrt{2}=N/(4\pi)$ and $\alpha g^2=m/\sqrt{2}$, whose unique positive solution is the stated pair. Thus the supersymmetry is not an accidental low-energy symmetry but an exact property of the quantum field theory at a special mass, enforced by the anomaly coefficient $N$. In the generalized models with massless fermions, the same mechanism gives a conserved supercurrent at $m=\sqrt{g^2(N+k)/(2\pi)}$, and the associated supersymmetric stress tensor differs from the canonical one by the Sugawara stress tensor of the massless currents, so the supersymmetric and conformal-field-theory sectors decouple.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes that the point-splitting regulator used to define the composite operators produces exactly the anomaly coefficient $N$ in formulas (2.17) and (2.19); if a different regulator shifted that coefficient, the special mass at which supersymmetry appears would shift as well.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At $m=\sqrt{g^2 N/(2\pi)}$, adjoint QCD$_2$ is exactly $\mathcal{N}=(1,1)$ supersymmetric, with supercharges built from the conserved supercurrent.
  • Because the supercurrent contains $\alpha\operatorname{tr}(\psi_\pm F)$ terms, a nonzero background value of $F$ in the non-trivial flux tube sectors spontaneously breaks supersymmetry there.
  • In the theories with extra massless fermions, a conserved supercurrent exists at $m=\sqrt{g^2(N+k)/(2\pi)}$; the massive sector is supersymmetric while the coset conformal-field-theory sector is generically not, so the theory is partially supersymmetric.
  • If the massless matter is chosen so that the infrared coset has vanishing Virasoro central charge, the whole theory is supersymmetric; one example is $SU(N)$ with one massless and one massive adjoint fermion, the massive fermion having mass $\sqrt{g^2 N/\pi}$.
  • A fully supersymmetric gapless example is $SU(N)$ with three adjoint fermions, two massless and one of mass $\sqrt{3g^2 N/(2\pi)}$; its low-energy coset $SO(2N^2-2)_1/SU(N)_{2N}$ is $\mathcal{N}=(2,2)$ supersymmetric.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extension: the proposed scheme-independence of the anomaly coefficient makes the mass formula a sharp nonperturbative prediction; an independent regulator should see the supercharge algebra close at exactly $m=\sqrt{g^2 N/(2\pi)}$ at finite $N$, with no $1/N$ corrections.
  • Extension: all formulas are expressed through the dual Coxeter number $h^\vee$ for general gauge groups, suggesting the construction is governed by the index of the adjoint representation; other two-index fermion representations with different anomaly coefficients may support analogous supercurrents, a class not explored here.
  • Extension: in the three-adjoint gapless model, the global $\mathcal{N}=(1,1)$ supercurrent coexists with the coset's $\mathcal{N}=(2,2)$ supercurrents; combining them may reveal an enlarged supersymmetry algebra with an R-symmetry acting on the entire spectrum, a testable spectral prediction not stated in the paper.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper constructs a gauge-invariant, Lorentz-covariant supercurrent for adjoint QCD2 and shows that its conservation at the quantum level fixes the fermion mass to m = sqrt(g^2 N/(2π)) and the coefficient alpha = sqrt(N/(4π g^2)), thereby proving N=(1,1) supersymmetry at that point. The construction is extended to theories with additional massless fermions, where a conserved supercurrent exists at m = sqrt(g^2(N+k)/(2π)), giving a supersymmetric massive sector and generically a non-supersymmetric coset CFT sector. The paper further claims that for special matter content (e.g., SU(N) with two adjoints, one massless and one massive at sqrt(g^2 N/π), and SU(N) with three adjoints, two massless and one massive at sqrt(3 g^2 N/(2π))), the entire theory, including the gapless sector, is supersymmetric. The core derivation relies on quantum anomaly formulas for composite operators developed in Appendix A.

Significance. The explicit covariant supercurrent is a valuable advance: previous proofs of the supersymmetry of adjoint QCD2 were given in light-cone gauge or on a small circle, whereas here the conservation is checked directly in a gauge-invariant way and yields the mass and the coefficient alpha by solving the conservation equations. The paper also cleanly exhibits the supercurrent multiplet, including the central-charge operator Z ∝ tr F^2, and shows how the F-dependent terms in the supercharge lead to spontaneous supersymmetry breaking in nontrivial flux tube sectors. The generalization to partially supersymmetric theories with massless fermions, and the identification of fully supersymmetric gapless models, are interesting and likely correct. However, the fully supersymmetric claims in Sections 3.6 and 3.9 rest on asserted cancellations of four-fermion terms that are not demonstrated, and the N_f > 2 generalization is stated without proof. The core adjoint-QCD2 result is explicit, internally consistent, and agrees with established light-cone, small-circle, and lattice benchmarks.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3.9, Eq. (3.51)] The total supercurrent j_tot = j + j_CFT is claimed to generate an N=(1,1) supersymmetry of the full gauge theory. Two load-bearing steps are not demonstrated: (i) conservation of j_tot in the full theory, which is not automatic because the CFT supercurrent j_CFT in (3.50) is not a conserved current of the coupled gauge-matter system; and (ii) the exact cancellation of the four-fermion term ∼ tr(ẽψ1− ẽψ1− ẽψ2− ẽψ2−) in the anticommutator {Q, j} that would yield the canonical stress tensor. The text asserts this cancellation without showing the computation. Please provide the explicit anticommutator calculation or an OPE-based argument. The analogous statement in Section 3.6 ("it is not hard to check") should also be substantiated with at least the main steps.
  2. [Section 3.9, final paragraph] The statement that the construction extends to N_f > 2 massless adjoints, with the full gauge theory being N=(1,1) supersymmetric at mass sqrt((N_f+1) g^2 N/(2π)), is presented as a result ("By constructing the supercharge, we can show...") but the proof is deferred to a later publication. As written, this is an unsupported assertion. It should be explicitly labeled as a conjecture or future work, or the proof should be included in the paper.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.3, Eq. (3.20)] The sign of [Q_+, Z] in Eq. (3.20) differs from the analogous commutator in Eq. (2.40) of Section 2.4. Please check which sign is correct and ensure consistency.
  2. [Section 2.3, Eq. (2.24)] The notation j_{-+} and j_{+-} for the light-cone components is easy to misread; a short clarifying sentence about the ordering of the spinor and spacetime indices would improve readability.
  3. [Section 3.8, around Eq. (3.44)] The U(1) example rescales the supercurrent by a factor of 2 relative to the general ansatz (3.11) without comment in the main text; a brief remark would prevent confusion.
  4. [Introduction, second paragraph] There is a redundant article in the sentence "the energy-momentum tensor T_SUSY^{μν} that belongs to the same supermultiplet... contains certain four-fermion terms"; this is a minor typo.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the supercurrent conservation equations are solved for the mass and normalization, and the anomaly coefficients are computed in Appendix A rather than imported from the target result.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained and does not reduce to its inputs. The supercurrent (2.24) is an ansatz whose two constants (m, α) are fixed by requiring ∂_+ j_{--} + ∂_- j_{+-} = 0: Eq. (2.31) gives the contribution −N/(4π) tr(ψ_- F) − (m/√2) tr(ψ_+ ψ_- ψ_-), Eq. (2.28) gives α m/√2 tr(ψ_- F) + α g^2 tr(ψ_+ ψ_- ψ_-), and equating the coefficients of the two independent operator structures yields exactly m = √(g^2 N/(2π)) and α = √(N/(4π g^2)). The anomaly coefficient N in Eqs. (2.17) and (2.19) is derived in Appendix A from the short-distance OPE ψψ ∼ −i/(2π x_-) and the Wilson-line point-splitting regulator, not imported from the known supersymmetric mass. The generalized models similarly solve for m and α from the current-algebra level k, and prior light-cone, small-circle, and lattice results are cited as independent benchmarks rather than used as inputs. The one caveat worth flagging is not circular: the three-adjoint full-supersymmetry claim in Sec. 3.9 rests on the statement that an extraneous four-fermion term in T_-- 'is exactly canceled' by the CFT supercurrent contribution, but the computation is not displayed; this is an omitted verification, and the N_f > 2 generalization is explicitly deferred to a later publication, not a reduction of the prediction to the input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted free parameters: the constants alpha and m are fixed by the supercurrent conservation equations. The ledger's axioms are the OPE/current-algebra inputs, the point-splitting anomaly calculus, and external coset CFT results; those are the unproven background the derivation leans on.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Free-fermion OPE psi^a(x) psi^b(0) = -i delta^{ab} gamma^mu x_mu/(2 pi x^2) + ... (Eq. 2.20)
    Input for computing D_+ J_- and the anomaly terms in Eqs. (2.21), (2.30), and Appendix A.
  • domain assumption Gauge-covariant point-splitting with Wilson lines yields the composite-operator anomaly formulas (2.17), (2.19) with coefficient N; the components used are regulator-independent (Appendix A).
    This is the core technical step that fixes the supersymmetric mass through Eq. (2.31). If a different regulator changed the anomaly coefficient, the derived mass would change.
  • standard math Massless fermion currents obey SU(N) level-k current algebra (3.6) with k = C_2(R) dimR/(N^2-1), and have anomalies D_+ eJ_- = -(k/4 pi) F, D_- eJ_+ = (k/4 pi) F (Eqs. 3.6, 3.8).
    Used in Section 3 to extend the construction to additional massless fermions and to derive the mass formula m^2 = g^2(N+k)/(2 pi).
  • domain assumption The difference Delta T between canonical and Sugawara stress tensors is the coset stress tensor SO(dimR)_1/SU(N)_k, and Delta T = 0 iff the coset central charge c_IR = 0 (cites [38]).
    This external result grounds the fully supersymmetric cases in Sections 3.5 and 3.6.
  • domain assumption The IR coset SO(2N^2-2)_1/SU(N)_{2N} has N=(2,2) supersymmetry with the complex supercurrent (3.50) (cites [29,30]).
    Used in Section 3.9 to construct the total supercurrent of the three-adjoint fully supersymmetric model.
  • domain assumption Supersymmetric adjoint QCD2 has a unique vacuum, and generalized degenerate vacua are related by non-invertible symmetries commuting with Z, so the central charge vanishes (Section 2.4 and Footnote 10).
    Used to state that the central term in the SUSY algebra does not contribute; this is a dynamical claim not fully proven in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Supercurrents and (Partial) Supersymmetry in Adjoint QCD$_2$ and Its Generalizations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DUHULUNS

@misc{pith2026250717138,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Supercurrents and (Partial) Supersymmetry in Adjoint QCD$_2$ and Its Generalizations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DUHULUNS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.17138}
}
abstract

$1+1$-dimensional $SU(N)$ gauge theory coupled to an adjoint Majorana fermion, also known as adjoint QCD$_2$, has the surprising feature that at fermion mass $\sqrt{\frac{g^2 N}{2 \pi}}$ it exhibits supersymmetry. In this paper, we obtain a deeper insight into how the supersymmetry works by constructing the gauge invariant, Lorentz covariant supercurrent $j_{\mu A}$. Its conservation relies crucially on the presence of a quantum anomaly. We generalize this construction to a class of models where, in addition to an adjoint Majorana fermion of an appropriate mass, the gauge theory is coupled to some collection of massless fermions ($SU(N)$ may be replaced by a more general gauge group). In general, these models have a supersymmetric massive sector and a non-supersymmetric CFT sector [arXiv:2202.04017], but there are cases in which both sectors are supersymmetric. An example of such a gapless, fully supersymmetric model is $SU(N)$ gauge theory coupled to three adjoint Majorana fermions, of which two are massless and the third has mass $\sqrt{\frac{3g^2 N}{2\pi}}$.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Supersymmetry in QCD 2 coupled to fermions,

    F. K. Popov, “Supersymmetry in QCD 2 coupled to fermions,”Phys. Rev. D105 (2022), no. 7 074005,2202.04017

    arXiv 2022

  2. [2]

    A Two-Dimensional Model for Mesons,

    G. ’t Hooft, “A Two-Dimensional Model for Mesons,”Nucl. Phys. B75(1974) 461–470

    work page 1974

  3. [3]

    θVacua in Two-dimensional Quantum Chromodynamics,

    E. Witten, “θVacua in Two-dimensional Quantum Chromodynamics,”Nuovo Cim. A 51(1979) 325

    work page 1979

  4. [4]

    String spectrum of (1 + 1)-dimensional largeNQCD with adjoint matter,

    S. Dalley and I. R. Klebanov, “String spectrum of (1 + 1)-dimensional largeNQCD with adjoint matter,”Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 2517–2527,hep-th/9209049. 37

    arXiv 1993

  5. [5]

    Two Dimensional QCD coupled to Adjoint Matter and String Theory

    D. Kutasov, “Two-dimensional QCD coupled to adjoint matter and string theory,” Nucl. Phys. B414(1994) 33–52,hep-th/9306013

    work page Pith review arXiv 1994

  6. [6]

    (1 + 1)-dimensional largeNQCD coupled to adjoint fermions,

    G. Bhanot, K. Demeterfi, and I. R. Klebanov, “(1 + 1)-dimensional largeNQCD coupled to adjoint fermions,”Phys. Rev. D48(1993) 4980–4990,hep-th/9307111

    arXiv 1993

  7. [7]

    The Spectrum of a largeNgauge theory near transition from confinement to screening,

    D. J. Gross, A. Hashimoto, and I. R. Klebanov, “The Spectrum of a largeNgauge theory near transition from confinement to screening,”Phys. Rev. D57(1998) 6420–6428,hep-th/9710240

    arXiv 1998

  8. [8]

    Solving 2D QCD with an adjoint fermion analytically,

    E. Katz, G. Marques Tavares, and Y. Xu, “Solving 2D QCD with an adjoint fermion analytically,”JHEP05(2014) 143,1308.4980

    arXiv 2014

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    Towards finding the single-particle content of two-dimensional adjoint QCD,

    U. Trittmann, “Towards finding the single-particle content of two-dimensional adjoint QCD,”Phys. Rev. D92(2015), no. 8 085021,1506.08119

    2015 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Exact symmetries and threshold states in two-dimensional models for QCD,

    R. Dempsey, I. R. Klebanov, and S. S. Pufu, “Exact symmetries and threshold states in two-dimensional models for QCD,”JHEP10(2021) 096,2101.05432

    2021 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Adjoint Majorana QCD 2 at finite N,

    R. Dempsey, I. R. Klebanov, L. L. Lin, and S. S. Pufu, “Adjoint Majorana QCD 2 at finite N,”JHEP04(2023) 107,2210.10895

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Screening versus confinement in (1+1)-dimensions,

    D. J. Gross, I. R. Klebanov, A. V. Matytsin, and A. V. Smilga, “Screening versus confinement in (1+1)-dimensions,”Nucl. Phys. B461(1996) 109–130, hep-th/9511104

    1996 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Nonabelian Bosonization in Two Dimensions,

    E. Witten, “Nonabelian Bosonization in Two Dimensions,”Commun. Math. Phys.92 (1984) 455–472

    1984

  6. [14]

    String Models with c<1 Components,

    K. Bardakci, E. Rabinovici, and B. Saering, “String Models with c<1 Components,” Nucl. Phys. B299(1988) 151

    1988

  7. [15]

    Instantons and fermion condensate in adjoint QCD in two dimensions,

    A. V. Smilga, “Instantons and fermion condensate in adjoint QCD in two dimensions,”Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 6836–6848,hep-th/9402066

    1994 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Quantum mechanics of the vacuum state in two-dimensional QCD with adjoint fermions,

    F. Lenz, M. A. Shifman, and M. Thies, “Quantum mechanics of the vacuum state in two-dimensional QCD with adjoint fermions,”Phys. Rev. D51(1995) 7060–7082, hep-th/9412113

    1995 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Two-dimensional instantons with bosonization and physics of adjoint QCD(2),

    A. V. Smilga, “Two-dimensional instantons with bosonization and physics of adjoint QCD(2),”Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 7757–7773,hep-th/9607007. 38

    1996 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Anomalies, a mod 2 index, and dynamics of 2d adjoint QCD,

    A. Cherman, T. Jacobson, Y. Tanizaki, and M. ¨Unsal, “Anomalies, a mod 2 index, and dynamics of 2d adjoint QCD,”SciPost Phys.8(2020), no. 5 072,1908.09858

    2020 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Symmetries and strings of adjoint QCD 2,

    Z. Komargodski, K. Ohmori, K. Roumpedakis, and S. Seifnashri, “Symmetries and strings of adjoint QCD 2,”JHEP03(2021) 103,2008.07567

    2021 arXiv

  12. [20]

    A comment on instantons and their fermion zero modes in adjoint QCD 2,

    A. V. Smilga, “A comment on instantons and their fermion zero modes in adjoint QCD 2,”SciPost Phys.10(2021), no. 6 152,2104.06266

    2021 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Lattice Hamiltonian for adjoint QCD2,

    R. Dempsey, I. R. Klebanov, S. S. Pufu, and B. T. Søgaard, “Lattice Hamiltonian for adjoint QCD2,”JHEP08(2024) 009,2311.09334

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    More about the lattice Hamiltonian for Adjoint QCD 2,

    R. Dempsey, S. S. Pufu, B. T. Søgaard, and I. R. Klebanov, “More about the lattice Hamiltonian for Adjoint QCD 2,”JHEP06(2025) 260,2409.19164

    2025 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Symmetries and mass splittings in QCD in two-dimensions coupled to adjoint fermions,

    J. Boorstein and D. Kutasov, “Symmetries and mass splittings in QCD in two-dimensions coupled to adjoint fermions,”Nucl. Phys. B421(1994) 263–277, hep-th/9401044

    1994 arXiv

  16. [24]

    On exact supersymmetry in DLCQ,

    F. Antonuccio, O. Lunin, and S. Pinsky, “On exact supersymmetry in DLCQ,”Phys. Lett. B442(1998) 173–179,hep-th/9809165

    1998 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Small circle expansion for adjoint QCD2 with periodic boundary conditions,

    R. Dempsey, I. R. Klebanov, S. S. Pufu, and B. T. Søgaard, “Small circle expansion for adjoint QCD2 with periodic boundary conditions,”JHEP11(2024) 128,2406.17079

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    A Supersymmetric Wess-Zumino Lagrangian in Two-Dimensions,

    P. Di Vecchia, V. G. Knizhnik, J. L. Petersen, and P. Rossi, “A Supersymmetric Wess-Zumino Lagrangian in Two-Dimensions,”Nucl. Phys. B253(1985) 701–726

    1985

  19. [27]

    Constraints on Supersymmetry Breaking,

    E. Witten, “Constraints on Supersymmetry Breaking,”Nucl. Phys. B202(1982) 253

    1982

  20. [28]

    Infrared phases of 2d QCD,

    D. Delmastro, J. Gomis, and M. Yu, “Infrared phases of 2d QCD,”JHEP02(2023) 157,2108.02202

    2023 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Strange Metals in One Spatial Dimension,

    R. Gopakumar, A. Hashimoto, I. R. Klebanov, S. Sachdev, and K. Schoutens, “Strange Metals in One Spatial Dimension,”Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 066003,1206.4719

    2012 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Chiral Primaries in Strange Metals,

    M. Isachenkov, I. Kirsch, and V. Schomerus, “Chiral Primaries in Strange Metals,” Nucl. Phys. B885(2014) 679–712,1403.6857

    2014 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Symmetries, universes and phases of QCD 2 with an adjoint Dirac fermion,

    J. A. Damia, G. Galati, and L. Tizzano, “Symmetries, universes and phases of QCD 2 with an adjoint Dirac fermion,”JHEP12(2025) 230,2409.17989. 39

    2025 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Gauge Invariance and Mass. 2.,

    J. S. Schwinger, “Gauge Invariance and Mass. 2.,”Phys. Rev.128(1962) 2425–2429

    1962

  25. [33]

    M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder,An Introduction to quantum field theory. Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA, 1995

    1995

  26. [34]

    A Simple Worldsheet Black Hole,

    S. Dubovsky, “A Simple Worldsheet Black Hole,”JHEP07(2018) 011,1803.00577

    2018 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Supercurrents and Brane Currents in Diverse Dimensions,

    T. T. Dumitrescu and N. Seiberg, “Supercurrents and Brane Currents in Diverse Dimensions,”JHEP07(2011) 095,1106.0031

    2011 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Supersymmetry andT Tdeformations,

    C.-K. Chang, C. Ferko, and S. Sethi, “Supersymmetry andT Tdeformations,”JHEP 04(2019) 131,1811.01895

    2019 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Supersymmetric Solitons and How They Help Us Understand Non-Abelian Gauge Theories,

    M. Shifman and A. Yung, “Supersymmetric Solitons and How They Help Us Understand Non-Abelian Gauge Theories,”Rev. Mod. Phys.79(2007) 1139, hep-th/0703267

    2007 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Symmetric Spaces, Sugawara’s Energy Momentum Tensor in Two-Dimensions and Free Fermions,

    P. Goddard, W. Nahm, and D. I. Olive, “Symmetric Spaces, Sugawara’s Energy Momentum Tensor in Two-Dimensions and Free Fermions,”Phys. Lett. B160(1985) 111

    1985

  31. [39]

    Supersymmetry in DLCQ for 2d adjoint QCD

    A. McDonald, “Supersymmetry in DLCQ for 2d adjoint QCD.” Junior Paper, Princeton University, 2021

    2021

  32. [40]

    γ 5 invariance,

    K. Johnson, “γ 5 invariance,”Phys. Lett.5(1963) 253–255

    1963

  33. [41]

    Nonabelian Bosonization and Multiflavor QED and QCD in Two-dimensions,

    D. Gepner, “Nonabelian Bosonization and Multiflavor QED and QCD in Two-dimensions,”Nucl. Phys. B252(1985) 481–507

    1985

  34. [42]

    On the Realization of Chiral Symmetry in (1 + 1) dimensions,

    I. Affleck, “On the Realization of Chiral Symmetry in (1 + 1) dimensions,”Nucl. Phys. B265(1986) 448–468. 40

    1986

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.