pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.17811 · v2 · submitted 2025-07-23 · ✦ hep-th

Medicine show: A Calogero model with principal series states

Tarek Anous , Jackson R. Fliss , Jeremy van der Heijden This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 02:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords Calogero modelprincipal seriessl(2,R)unitarityintegrabilityquantum mechanicsde Sitter space
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

The Calogero model can accommodate principal series states of sl(2,R) by changing the domain of its quantum operators.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The original Calogero model is an N-particle quantum system invariant under sl(2,R) with a Hilbert space consisting of discrete series modules, and it is integrable thanks to commuting currents including the Hamiltonian. The paper modifies this model to include states from the unitary principal series representation by altering the domain of the quantum operators. This adjustment keeps the system unitary and fully sl(2,R)-invariant. The integrability is changed as a result. The authors provide explicit solutions for two and three particles and a general approach for larger N, with potential lessons for quantum field theories on de Sitter space.

Core claim

By changing the domain of the quantum operators, the Calogero model is extended to accommodate states in the unitary principal series irreducible representation of sl(2,R). This succeeds in preserving unitarity and sl(2,R)-invariance but alters the integrability properties of the theory. The deformed model is solved explicitly for N=2 and N=3, with a procedure outlined for general N.

What carries the argument

Altering the domain of the quantum operators to extend the Hilbert space to include principal series states.

If this is right

  • The deformed Calogero model preserves unitarity.
  • It maintains full sl(2,R) invariance.
  • Integrability properties are altered compared to the original model.
  • Explicit solutions are available for N=2 and N=3.
  • A general procedure exists for solving at any N.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This domain alteration method may apply to other sl(2,R)-invariant systems with principal series states.
  • Lessons from this model could help analyze interacting massive quantum field theories in de Sitter space.
  • Numerical checks for small N could verify the preservation of commutation relations.

Load-bearing premise

Changing the domain of the quantum operators succeeds in adding principal series states without losing unitarity or sl(2,R) invariance.

What would settle it

Demonstrating that a principal series state in the modified model is non-normalizable or that the sl(2,R) generators do not close properly on the new states.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.17811 by Jackson R. Fliss, Jeremy van der Heijden, Tarek Anous.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The algebra of operators of the Calogero model. The top row denote the commuting currents in the current algebra, and the second row are the Witt algebra generators. The operators H/K take us up/down a column, respectively, and the operators L1/L−1 move us right/left along a row, respectively. The column denoted in blue is special, as it is the only column whose operators form a closed subalgebra, in this … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A depiction of the vectors b [i,j] that enter in the potential of the N = 3 Calogero model. To proceed, we need to compute the Vandermonde ∆ ∆(y) = Y a  b a · y r  = Y a cos Θa . (3.16) The vectors b a , defined in (2.52), are given by b [2,1] = [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Calogero model is an interacting, $N$-particle, $\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb R)$-invariant quantum mechanics, whose Hilbert space is furnished by a tower of discrete series modules. The system enjoys both classical and quantum integrability at any $N$ and at any value of the coupling; this is guaranteed by the existence of $N$ mutually-commuting currents, one of them being the Hamiltonian. In this paper, we alter the Calogero model so that it may accommodate states in the unitary principal series irreducible representation of $\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb R)$. Doing so requires changing the domain of the quantum operators--a procedure which succeeds in preserving unitarity and $\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb R)$-invariance, but alters the integrability properties of the theory. We explicitly solve the deformed model for $N=2,3$ and outline a procedure for solving the model at general $N$. We expect this deformed model to provide us with general lessons that carry over to other systems with states in the principal series, for example, interacting massive quantum field theories on de Sitter space.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a deformed version of the Calogero model that accommodates unitary principal series irreducible representations of sl(2,R) by changing the domain of the quantum operators. This preserves unitarity and sl(2,R)-invariance but alters the integrability properties. Explicit solutions are given for N=2 and N=3, with an outline for general N. The motivation is to extract lessons applicable to other systems with principal series states, such as interacting massive QFT on de Sitter space.

Significance. If the domain modification is rigorously shown to maintain self-adjointness of all generators and irreducibility, the construction supplies a concrete, solvable example of an interacting quantum system realizing principal series representations while retaining sl(2,R) symmetry. The explicit N=2,3 solutions are a clear strength, permitting direct verification. This could serve as a useful toy model for non-compact symmetries in curved-space QFT, though the loss of integrability represents a notable trade-off.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and the central construction: the claim that changing the domain 'succeeds in preserving unitarity and sl(2,R)-invariance' is load-bearing for the main result. The manuscript must explicitly demonstrate that the non-compact generator remains essentially self-adjoint on the new domain, that the Casimir eigenvalue matches the continuous-series value, and that the representation stays irreducible rather than decomposing.
  2. [Section on explicit solutions (N=2,3)] Explicit solutions for N=2 and N=3: the provided wave functions need to be checked to confirm that the inner product is positive definite on the enlarged domain and that no boundary terms arise that would violate the sl(2,R) Lie-algebra relations on a dense subspace.
minor comments (2)
  1. [General N procedure] The outline for general N would benefit from a more precise definition of the deformed domain for arbitrary particle number.
  2. [Introduction] Notation for the sl(2,R) generators and the coupling could be standardized and introduced earlier to improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested clarifications and verifications.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and the central construction: the claim that changing the domain 'succeeds in preserving unitarity and sl(2,R)-invariance' is load-bearing for the main result. The manuscript must explicitly demonstrate that the non-compact generator remains essentially self-adjoint on the new domain, that the Casimir eigenvalue matches the continuous-series value, and that the representation stays irreducible rather than decomposing.

    Authors: We agree that the central claim requires a more explicit and self-contained demonstration. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection to the general construction (following the definition of the enlarged domain) that (i) proves essential self-adjointness of the non-compact generator by exhibiting a dense core on which the deficiency indices vanish, (ii) evaluates the Casimir operator directly on this domain and confirms that its eigenvalue coincides with the continuous-series value, and (iii) establishes irreducibility by showing that any proper invariant subspace would contradict the explicit action of the lowering operator on the principal-series states. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section on explicit solutions (N=2,3)] Explicit solutions for N=2 and N=3: the provided wave functions need to be checked to confirm that the inner product is positive definite on the enlarged domain and that no boundary terms arise that would violate the sl(2,R) Lie-algebra relations on a dense subspace.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. For the explicit N=2 and N=3 solutions the wave functions are square-integrable by construction with respect to the standard L2 inner product on the enlarged domain. In the revision we will insert a short appendix containing the explicit verification that this inner product is positive definite and that integration by parts on the dense subspace of compactly supported smooth functions produces no residual boundary terms, thereby ensuring that the sl(2,R) commutation relations hold without modification. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct domain modification using standard sl(2,R) theory

full rationale

The paper constructs the deformed Calogero model by explicitly changing the domain of the differential operators to include principal-series wavefunctions while preserving the formal sl(2,R) generators and the inner product. This step draws on textbook facts about unitary representations of sl(2,R) and supplies explicit solutions for N=2 and N=3; the derivation does not reduce any claimed prediction or invariance statement to a fitted parameter, a self-citation chain, or a redefinition of the input. The central claim therefore remains independent of the paper's own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard facts from sl(2,R) representation theory and the assumption that a domain restriction can embed principal series states without violating unitarity or invariance; no free parameters or new postulated entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Unitary principal series representations of sl(2,R) can be realized on a suitably restricted domain of the Calogero operators while preserving the algebra and unitarity.
    This is the load-bearing modification described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5735 in / 1336 out tokens · 42689 ms · 2026-05-19T02:25:28.044746+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 102 canonical work pages · 41 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Dynamische stabilit¨ at im de-sitter-raum.,

    O. Nachtmann, “Dynamische stabilit¨ at im de-sitter-raum.,”Oesterreichische Akademie Wissenschaften Mathematisch naturwissenschaftliche Klasse Sitzungsberichte Abteilung 176 (1968) 363–379

    work page 1968

  2. [2]

    Particle decays and stability on the de Sitter universe

    J. Bros, H. Epstein, and U. Moschella, “Particle decays and stability on the de Sitter universe,” Annales Henri Poincare 11 (2010) 611–658, arXiv:0812.3513 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  3. [3]

    Remarks on quantum field theory on de Sitter and anti-de Sitter space-times,

    H. Epstein, “Remarks on quantum field theory on de Sitter and anti-de Sitter space-times,” Pramana 78 (2012) 853–864

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    Relaxing the cosmological constant,

    N. C. Tsamis and R. P. Woodard, “Relaxing the cosmological constant,” Phys. Lett. B 301 (1993) 351–357

    work page 1993

  5. [5]

    Quantum Gravity Slows Inflation

    N. C. Tsamis and R. P. Woodard, “Quantum gravity slows inflation,” Nucl. Phys. B 474 (1996) 235–248, arXiv:hep-ph/9602315

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  6. [6]

    Quantum Contributions to Cosmological Correlations

    S. Weinberg, “Quantum contributions to cosmological correlations,” Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 043514, arXiv:hep-th/0506236. 43

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  7. [7]

    Quantum Contributions to Cosmological Correlations II: Can These Corrections Become Large?

    S. Weinberg, “Quantum contributions to cosmological correlations. II. Can these corrections become large?,” Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 023508, arXiv:hep-th/0605244

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  8. [8]

    Breakdown of Semiclassical Methods in de Sitter Space

    C. P. Burgess, R. Holman, L. Leblond, and S. Shandera, “Breakdown of Semiclassical Methods in de Sitter Space,” JCAP 10 (2010) 017, arXiv:1005.3551 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  9. [9]

    De Sitter Space and Eternity

    A. M. Polyakov, “De Sitter space and eternity,” Nucl. Phys. B 797 (2008) 199–217, arXiv:0709.2899 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  10. [10]

    Super-Hubble de Sitter Fluctuations and the Dynamical RG

    C. P. Burgess, L. Leblond, R. Holman, and S. Shandera, “Super-Hubble de Sitter Fluctuations and the Dynamical RG,” JCAP 03 (2010) 033, arXiv:0912.1608 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  11. [11]

    Infrared effects in inflationary correlation functions

    D. Seery, “Infrared effects in inflationary correlation functions,” Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 124005, arXiv:1005.1649 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  12. [12]

    Late-time Structure of the Bunch-Davies De Sitter Wavefunction

    D. Anninos, T. Anous, D. Z. Freedman, and G. Konstantinidis, “Late-time Structure of the Bunch-Davies De Sitter Wavefunction,” JCAP 11 (2015) 048, arXiv:1406.5490 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  13. [13]

    On Loops in Inflation

    L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga, “On Loops in Inflation,” JHEP 12 (2010) 008, arXiv:0912.2734 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  14. [14]

    COSMOLOGY WITH DECAYING VACUUM ENERGY,

    K. Freese, F. C. Adams, J. A. Frieman, and E. Mottola, “COSMOLOGY WITH DECAYING VACUUM ENERGY,” in ACS Symposium on Origin and Distribution of the Elements. 9, 1987

    work page 1987

  15. [15]

    Resummation of infrared logarithms in de Sitter space via Dyson-Schwinger equations: the ladder-rainbow approximation

    A. Youssef and D. Kreimer, “Resummation of infrared logarithms in de Sitter space via Dyson-Schwinger equations: the ladder-rainbow approximation,” Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 124021, arXiv:1301.3205 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  16. [16]

    Equilibrium State of a Massless Self-Interacting Scalar Field in the De Sitter Background

    A. A. Starobinsky and J. Yokoyama, “Equilibrium state of a selfinteracting scalar field in the De Sitter background,” Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 6357–6368, arXiv:astro-ph/9407016

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  17. [17]

    Quantum Instability of De Sitter Space-time,

    L. H. Ford, “Quantum Instability of De Sitter Space-time,” Phys. Rev. D 31 (1985) 710

    work page 1985

  18. [18]

    On graviton non-Gaussianities during inflation

    J. M. Maldacena and G. L. Pimentel, “On graviton non-Gaussianities during inflation,” JHEP 09 (2011) 045, arXiv:1104.2846 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  19. [19]

    CMB from CFT

    I. Mata, S. Raju, and S. Trivedi, “CMB from CFT,” JHEP 07 (2013) 015, arXiv:1211.5482 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  20. [20]

    Holography for inflation using conformal perturbation theory

    A. Bzowski, P. McFadden, and K. Skenderis, “Holography for inflation using conformal perturbation theory,” JHEP 04 (2013) 047, arXiv:1211.4550 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  21. [21]

    Constraints from Conformal Symmetry on the Three Point Scalar Correlator in Inflation

    N. Kundu, A. Shukla, and S. P. Trivedi, “Constraints from Conformal Symmetry on the Three Point Scalar Correlator in Inflation,” JHEP 04 (2015) 061, arXiv:1410.2606 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  22. [22]

    Cosmological Collider Physics

    N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Maldacena, “Cosmological Collider Physics,” arXiv:1503.08043 [hep-th]. 44

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    The Cosmological Bootstrap: Inflationary Correlators from Symmetries and Singularities,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, D. Baumann, H. Lee, and G. L. Pimentel, “The Cosmological Bootstrap: Inflationary Correlators from Symmetries and Singularities,” JHEP 04 (2020) 105, arXiv:1811.00024 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    Bootstrapping Inflationary Correlators in Mellin Space,

    C. Sleight and M. Taronna, “Bootstrapping Inflationary Correlators in Mellin Space,” JHEP 02 (2020) 098, arXiv:1907.01143 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Towards the non-perturbative cosmological bootstrap,

    M. Hogervorst, J. Penedones, and K. S. Vaziri, “Towards the non-perturbative cosmological bootstrap,” JHEP 02 (2023) 162, arXiv:2107.13871 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Analyticity and unitarity for cosmological correlators,

    L. Di Pietro, V. Gorbenko, and S. Komatsu, “Analyticity and unitarity for cosmological correlators,” JHEP 03 (2022) 023, arXiv:2108.01695 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    Snowmass White Paper: The Cosmological Bootstrap,

    D. Baumann, D. Green, A. Joyce, E. Pajer, G. L. Pimentel, C. Sleight, and M. Taronna, “Snowmass White Paper: The Cosmological Bootstrap,” SciPost Phys. Comm. Rep. 2024 (2024) 1, arXiv:2203.08121 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    arXiv: 2312.17195 [hep-th] 151

    L. Di Pietro, V. Gorbenko, and S. Komatsu, “Cosmological Correlators at Finite Coupling,” arXiv:2312.17195 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  29. [29]

    De Sitter at all loops: the story of the Schwinger model,

    D. Anninos, T. Anous, and A. Rios Fukelman, “De Sitter at all loops: the story of the Schwinger model,” JHEP 08 (2024) 155, arXiv:2403.16166 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Solution of a Three-Body Problem in One Dimension,

    F. Calogero, “Solution of a Three-Body Problem in One Dimension,” J. Math. Phys. 10 (1969) 2191–2196

    work page 1969

  31. [31]

    Explicit Solution to the N-Body Calogero Problem

    L. Brink, T. H. Hansson, and M. A. Vasiliev, “Explicit solution to the N-body Calogero problem,” Phys. Lett. B 286 (1992) 109–111, arXiv:hep-th/9206049

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  32. [32]

    The Calogero Model - Anyonic Representation, Fermionic Extension and Supersymmetry

    L. Brink, T. H. Hansson, S. Konstein, and M. A. Vasiliev, “The Calogero model: Anyonic representation, fermionic extension and supersymmetry,” Nucl. Phys. B 401 (1993) 591–612, arXiv:hep-th/9302023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  33. [33]

    Explicit Relation of Quantum Hall Effect and Calogero-Sutherland Model

    H. Azuma and S. Iso, “Explicit relation of quantum hall effect and Calogero-Sutherland model,” Phys. Lett. B 331 (1994) 107–113, arXiv:hep-th/9312001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  34. [34]

    Collective Field Theory of the Fractional Quantum Hall Edge State and the Calogero-Sutherland Model

    S. Iso and S. J. Rey, “Collective field theory of the fractional quantum hall edge state and the Calogero-Sutherland model,” Phys. Lett. B 352 (1995) 111–116, arXiv:hep-th/9406192

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  35. [35]

    Generalized statistics in one dimension

    A. P. Polychronakos, “Generalized statistics in one-dimension,” in Les Houches Summer School in Theoretical Physics, Session 69: Topological Aspects of Low-dimensional Systems . 2, 1999. arXiv:hep-th/9902157

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  36. [36]

    Quantum Hall states as matrix Chern-Simons theory

    A. P. Polychronakos, “Quantum Hall states as matrix Chern-Simons theory,” JHEP 04 (2001) 011, arXiv:hep-th/0103013

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  37. [37]

    Quantum Hall states on the cylinder as unitary matrix Chern-Simons theory

    A. P. Polychronakos, “Quantum Hall states on the cylinder as unitary matrix Chern-Simons theory,” JHEP 06 (2001) 070, arXiv:hep-th/0106011. 45

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  38. [38]

    Quantum Hall Physics = Noncommutative Field Theory

    S. Hellerman and M. Van Raamsdonk, “Quantum Hall physics equals noncommutative field theory,” JHEP 10 (2001) 039, arXiv:hep-th/0103179

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  39. [39]

    Conformal Invariance in Quantum Mechanics,

    V. de Alfaro, S. Fubini, and G. Furlan, “Conformal Invariance in Quantum Mechanics,” Nuovo Cim. A 34 (1976) 569

    work page 1976

  40. [40]

    On the geometry of conformal mechanics

    K. Andrzejewski and J. Gonera, “On the geometry of conformal mechanics,” arXiv:1108.1299 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    An invitation to the principal series,

    T. Anous and J. Skulte, “An invitation to the principal series,” SciPost Phys. 9 no. 3, (2020) 028, arXiv:2007.04975 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  42. [42]

    The discreet charm of the discrete series in dS 2,

    D. Anninos, T. Anous, B. Pethybridge, and G. S ¸eng¨ or, “The discreet charm of the discrete series in dS 2,” J. Phys. A 57 no. 2, (2024) 025401, arXiv:2307.15832 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    A note on the representations of SO(1 , d + 1),

    Z. Sun, “A note on the representations of SO(1,d + 1),” Rev. Math. Phys. 37 no. 01, (2025) 2430007, arXiv:2111.04591 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Spinning fields on Sd and dSd, unitary irreducible representations, and ladder operators,

    V. A. Letsios, M. N. Semp´ e, and G. A. Silva, “Spinning fields on Sd and dSd, unitary irreducible representations, and ladder operators,” Phys. Rev. D 111 no. 2, (2025) 025018, arXiv:2410.10964 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Quite discrete for a fermion,

    V. A. Letsios, B. Pethybridge, and A. Rios Fukelman, “Quite discrete for a fermion,” JHEP 07 (2025) 016, arXiv:2501.03724 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Notes on gauge fields and discrete series representations in de Sitter spacetimes,

    A. Rios Fukelman, M. Semp´ e, and G. A. Silva, “Notes on gauge fields and discrete series representations in de Sitter spacetimes,” JHEP 01 (2024) 011, arXiv:2310.14955 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Manifest Duality for Partially Massless Higher Spins

    K. Hinterbichler and A. Joyce, “Manifest Duality for Partially Massless Higher Spins,” JHEP 09 (2016) 141, arXiv:1608.04385 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  48. [48]

    Notes on complex q = 2 SYK,

    B. J. Pethybridge, “Notes on complex q = 2 SYK,” arXiv:2403.04673 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  49. [49]

    Tensors and spinors in de Sitter space,

    B. Pethybridge and V. Schaub, “Tensors and spinors in de Sitter space,” JHEP 06 (2022) 123, arXiv:2111.14899 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    Group theoretical approach to quantum fields in de Sitter space II. The complementary and discrete series

    E. Joung, J. Mourad, and R. Parentani, “Group theoretical approach to quantum fields in de Sitter space. II. The complementary and discrete series,” JHEP 09 (2007) 030, arXiv:0707.2907 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  51. [51]

    A radial variable for de Sitter two-point functions,

    M. Loparco, J. Qiao, and Z. Sun, “A radial variable for de Sitter two-point functions,” SciPost Phys. 18 (10, 2023) 164, arXiv:2310.15944 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    The K¨ all´ en-Lehmann representation in de Sitter spacetime,

    M. Loparco, J. Penedones, K. Salehi Vaziri, and Z. Sun, “The K¨ all´ en-Lehmann representation in de Sitter spacetime,” JHEP 12 (2023) 159, arXiv:2306.00090 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  53. [53]

    Notes on $\widetilde{\mathrm{SL}}(2,\mathbb{R})$ representations

    A. Kitaev, “Notes on fSL(2, R) representations,” arXiv:1711.08169 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    Irreducible unitary representations of the Lorentz group,

    V. Bargmann, “Irreducible unitary representations of the Lorentz group,” Annals Math. 48 (1947) 568–640. 46

    work page 1947

  55. [55]

    Unitary representations of the lorentz group,

    I. M. Gelfand and M. Neumark, “Unitary representations of the lorentz group,” Acad. Sci. USSR. J. Phys 10 (1946) 93–94

    work page 1946

  56. [56]

    Horizon instability of extremal Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black holes to charged perturbations,

    P. Zimmerman, “Horizon instability of extremal Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black holes to charged perturbations,” Phys. Rev. D 95 no. 12, (2017) 124032, arXiv:1612.03172 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2017

  57. [57]

    Scaling and Universality in Extremal Black Hole Perturbations

    S. E. Gralla and P. Zimmerman, “Scaling and Universality in Extremal Black Hole Perturbations,” JHEP 06 (2018) 061, arXiv:1804.04753 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  58. [58]

    Statistical mechanics of a two-dimensional black hole

    A. Kitaev and S. J. Suh, “Statistical mechanics of a two-dimensional black hole,” JHEP 05 (2019) 198, arXiv:1808.07032 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  59. [59]

    Notes on the complex Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,

    Y. Gu, A. Kitaev, S. Sachdev, and G. Tarnopolsky, “Notes on the complex Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,” JHEP 02 (2020) 157, arXiv:1910.14099 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  60. [60]

    Charged Quantum Fields in AdS 2,

    D. Anninos, D. M. Hofman, and J. Kruthoff, “Charged Quantum Fields in AdS 2,” SciPost Phys. 7 no. 4, (2019) 054, arXiv:1906.00924 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  61. [61]

    Marginal Deformations and Rotating Horizons

    D. Anninos, T. Anous, and R. T. D’Agnolo, “Marginal deformations \& rotating horizons,” JHEP 12 (2017) 095, arXiv:1707.03380 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  62. [62]

    Analyticity in Spin in Conformal Theories

    S. Caron-Huot, “Analyticity in Spin in Conformal Theories,” JHEP 09 (2017) 078, arXiv:1703.00278 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  63. [63]

    A spacetime derivation of the Lorentzian OPE inversion formula

    D. Simmons-Duffin, D. Stanford, and E. Witten, “A spacetime derivation of the Lorentzian OPE inversion formula,” JHEP 07 (2018) 085, arXiv:1711.03816 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  64. [64]

    The light-ray OPE and conformal colliders,

    M. Kologlu, P. Kravchuk, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Zhiboedov, “The light-ray OPE and conformal colliders,” JHEP 01 (2021) 128, arXiv:1905.01311 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  65. [65]

    Kravchuk and D

    P. Kravchuk and D. Simmons-Duffin, “Light-ray operators in conformal field theory,” JHEP 11 (2018) 102, arXiv:1805.00098 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2018

  66. [66]

    A Conformal Basis for Flat Space Amplitudes

    S. Pasterski and S.-H. Shao, “Conformal basis for flat space amplitudes,” Phys. Rev. D 96 no. 6, (2017) 065022, arXiv:1705.01027 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  67. [67]

    Asymptotic Symmetries and Celestial CFT,

    L. Donnay, S. Pasterski, and A. Puhm, “Asymptotic Symmetries and Celestial CFT,” JHEP 09 (2020) 176, arXiv:2005.08990 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  68. [68]

    Conformal block expansion in celestial CFT,

    A. Atanasov, W. Melton, A.-M. Raclariu, and A. Strominger, “Conformal block expansion in celestial CFT,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 12, (2021) 126033, arXiv:2104.13432 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  69. [69]

    Celestial Holography,

    S. Pasterski, M. Pate, and A.-M. Raclariu, “Celestial Holography,” in Snowmass 2021. 11,

    work page 2021

  70. [70]

    arXiv:2111.11392 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  71. [71]

    The Conformal Primon Gas at the End of Time,

    S. A. Hartnoll and M. Yang, “The Conformal Primon Gas at the End of Time,” arXiv:2502.02661 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  72. [72]

    Wheeler-DeWitt wavefunctions for 5d BKL dynamics, automorphic L-functions and complex primon gases,

    M. De Clerck, S. A. Hartnoll, and M. Yang, “Wheeler-DeWitt wavefunctions for 5d BKL dynamics, automorphic L-functions and complex primon gases,” arXiv:2507.08788 [hep-th]. 47

    work page arXiv

  73. [73]

    Solution of the One-Dimensional N-Body Problems with Quadratic and/or Inversely Quadratic Pair Potentials,

    F. Calogero, “Solution of the One-Dimensional N-Body Problems with Quadratic and/or Inversely Quadratic Pair Potentials,” J. Math. Phys. 12 (1971) 419–436

    work page 1971

  74. [74]

    Exact Results for a Quantum Many-Body Problem in One Dimension. II,

    B. Sutherland, “Exact Results for a Quantum Many-Body Problem in One Dimension. II,” Phys. Rev. A 5 (1972) 1372–1376

    work page 1972

  75. [75]

    Three integrable Hamiltonian systems connnected with isospectral deformations,

    J. Moser, “Three integrable Hamiltonian systems connnected with isospectral deformations,” Adv. Math. 16 (1975) 197–220

    work page 1975

  76. [76]

    Conformal Properties of a Class of Exactly Solvable N-Body Problems in Space Dimension One,

    G. Barucchi and T. Regge, “Conformal Properties of a Class of Exactly Solvable N-Body Problems in Space Dimension One,” J. Math. Phys. 18 (1977) 1149

    work page 1977

  77. [77]

    Representations of the Algebra SL(2,R) and Integration of Hamiltonian Systems,

    S. Wojciechowski, “Representations of the Algebra SL(2,R) and Integration of Hamiltonian Systems,” Phys. Lett. A 64 (1977) 273–275

    work page 1977

  78. [78]

    Superintegrability of the Calogero-Moser system,

    S. Wojciechowski, “Superintegrability of the Calogero-Moser system,” Physics Letters A 95 no. 6, (1983) 279–281

    work page 1983

  79. [79]

    Classical Calogero Model and Matrix Model,

    K. Hikami and M. Wadati, “Classical Calogero Model and Matrix Model,” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 62 no. 11, (1993) 3857–3863

    work page 1993

  80. [80]

    Integrability of the Quantum Calogero-Moser Model,

    H. Ujino, K. Hikami, and M. Wadati, “Integrability of the Quantum Calogero-Moser Model,” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 61 no. 10, (1992) 3425–3427

    work page 1992

Showing first 80 references.