Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 81 references

Multiple Populations of Same Sterile Neutrino as Dark Matter

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read One sterile neutrino species, produced in two cosmic bursts, can make a cool-plus-warm dark matter that is the whole relic abundance for 4–10 keV masses, evading X-ray and Lyman-alpha limits.

desk verdict A careful, quantitative mapping of multi-population sterile neutrino DM whose two-population claim holds up, though the semiclassical Boltzmann reduction at resonance needs sharper justification. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.17830 v1 pith:WPTZJBLU submitted 2025-07-23 hep-ph astro-ph.CO

Muping Chen , Graciela B. Gelmini , Philip Lu , Volodymyr Takhistov This is my paper
classification hep-phastro-ph.CO
keywords sterileneutrinodarkmattermulti-populationproductionresonantoscillationsnon-resonantleptonasymmetryprimordialblackholesheavyscalardecayswarm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that a single sterile neutrino species can be produced in several separate bursts during the early universe, so the dark matter it forms carries a multi-modal momentum spectrum rather than one characteristic temperature. In the main scenario, a primordial lepton asymmetry first drives resonantly enhanced active-sterile oscillations that make a cool population, and the resonance gradually drains the asymmetry; once the asymmetry is too small to sustain resonance, ordinary non-resonant oscillations make a warm population. For sterile masses near 4 to 10 keV, mixing angles between $10^{-12}$ and $10^{-9}$, and initial electron lepton asymmetries around $10^{-3}$ to $4\times10^{-3}$, the two populations contribute comparably and together can reach the full dark matter abundance while evading X-ray and Lyman-$\alpha$ limits. The same multi-population logic is applied to two further routes—evaporation of primordial black holes and decays of heavy singlet scalars or the inflaton—which can provide the cold component where resonant oscillations cannot. If the claim is right, structure-formation predictions and observational constraints have to be mapped separately for each population, not for a single averaged species.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing device is the semiclassical Boltzmann equation for the sterile-neutrino momentum distribution, Eq. (2.8), written in the expansion-invariant variables $\epsilon_g=\epsilon\,g_*^{-1/3}$ and $T_g=T\,g_*^{1/3}$, which allow production at different epochs with different numbers of relativistic degrees of freedom to be followed in one integration. Production is controlled by the in-medium conversion rate of Eq. (2.19), whose denominator contains the resonance condition $F_{\rm res}=0$ (Eq. (2.23)); this condition is quadratic in momentum, so it has two branches $\epsilon_{\rm res}^\pm(T)$ that merge at a termination temperature $T_{\rm end}\simeq 36\,{\rm MeV}\,(m_s/{\rm keV})(L_\alpha/10^{-3})^{-1}$. The lepton asymmetry is evolved through Eq. (2.30), whose antineutrino term drives $L_\alpha$ toward zero once resonance ends, and this depletion decides when the warm non-resonant phase begins. Two analytic inequalities delimit the two-population region: $T_{\rm end} > T_{\rm max}$, with $T_{\rm max}\simeq 133\,{\rm MeV}\,(m_s/{\rm keV})^{1/3}$ the non-resonant production peak, sets the lower mass bound, while requiring the upper resonance branch to reach $\epsilon\gtrsim 0.1$ sets the upper bound $m_{\rm reslim}^{\rm mod}$. Observational limits enter through Eq. (5.2), which maps each population's average momentum to an effective thermal-relic mass $m_{\rm therm}$, the quantity that Lyman-$\alpha$ forest and strong-lensing data actually bound.

What would settle it

Run the Table 1 benchmark parameters through a full quantum-kinetic (density-matrix) computation across the resonance epoch: if the produced cool-population abundance or the lepton-asymmetry depletion differs from the Boltzmann result by more than the claimed few percent, the two-population scenario for those parameters fails. Observationally, Lyman-$\alpha$ or strong-lensing data that excludes warm fractions above roughly 10 percent for effective thermal masses at or below 5.7 keV would close the $m_s\simeq 4$–8 keV models of Table 1, and an X-ray non-detection at 3.57 keV would eliminate the model presented as its explanation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the same sterile neutrino species does not need a single production story: because several production mechanisms can act at disjoint cosmological epochs, one particle species naturally ends up with several relic populations of different average momenta, i.e. a multi-modal spectrum. In the main oscillation scenario, a sizeable primordial electron lepton asymmetry first drives resonantly enhanced (Shi-Fuller-type) production of a cool population with $\langle\epsilon_{\rm ref}\rangle \lesssim 1$; the resonant conversion depletes the asymmetry, and once it is too small to sustain resonance, non-resonant (Dodelson-Widrow) production takes over and yields a warm population with $\langle\epsilon_{\rm ref}\rangle \simeq 2$–3. The authors solve the coupled Boltzmann and lepton-asymmetry equations in expansion-invariant variables, including antineutrino conversions (which roughly double the warm population and slow the asymmetry depletion), and derive analytic boundaries $T_{\rm end} > T_{\rm max}$ that confine sizable two-population production to the window $m_{\rm non-res}^{\rm mod} \simeq 0.29\,{\rm keV}\,(L_0/10^{-3})^{3/2} \lesssim m_s \lesssim m_{\rm reslim}^{\rm mod} \simeq 40.6\,{\rm keV}\,(L_0/10^{-3})^{3/2}$. The numerical scan then shows that for $m_s \simeq 4$–10 keV, $10^{-12}\lesssim \sin^2 2\theta \lesssim 10^{-9}$, and $L_{e,0}\simeq 10^{-3}$–$4\times10^{-3}$, the cool and warm components have comparable abundances and together can reach $f_{s,\rm DM}\simeq 1$ while passing X-ray and Lyman-$\alpha$ limits; four benchmark models are tabulated, one of which can reproduce the disputed 3.57 keV X-ray line. The same multi-population logic is applied to gravitational production from two evaporating primordial-black-hole populations and to singlet-Higgs or inflaton decays combined with non-resonant oscillations.

Load-bearing premise

The entire production calculation rests on treating the early-universe plasma semiclassically—a Boltzmann equation that neglects quantum coherence, the sterile-neutrino back-reaction, and active flavor oscillations—exactly in the resonance epoch where production peaks and the lepton asymmetry changes fastest, so if those neglected effects matter there, the cool-population abundances and the two-population mass window would shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claim holds, a cool-plus-warm sterile neutrino population suppresses the matter power spectrum at two distinct scales rather than one: the warm part erases small-scale power as in warm dark matter while the cool part preserves it, a two-scale signature that can ease small-scale structure tensions while remaining consistent with Lyman-$\alpha$ and strong-lensing bounds.
  • The benchmark models of Table 1 become concrete experimental targets: the $m_s\simeq 4.3$ keV and $m_s\simeq 7.1$–7.8 keV models sit below current NuSTAR X-ray limits and are testable in the XRISM 0.4–15 keV band, and the $m_s=7.14$ keV model is a candidate explanation of the disputed 3.57 keV line.
  • For the oscillation mechanism, two-population production is confined to the analytic window $m_{\rm non-res}^{\rm mod}\lesssim m_s \lesssim m_{\rm reslim}^{\rm mod}\simeq 40.6\,{\rm keV}\,(L_0/10^{-3})^{3/2}$, so finding a sterile-neutrino dark matter candidate outside this window would rule out resonant-plus-non-resonant co-production as its origin.
  • In the primordial black hole scenario, two monochromatic PBH populations produce two spectral peaks whose separation is fixed by the mass ratio, and if the heavier population briefly dominates the universe the earlier population is redshifted colder while the evaporation itself sources a stochastic gravitational-wave background—so a gravitational-wave detection plus a two-scale matter-power signat

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extension: the two-population pattern is generic—any two production mechanisms acting at disjoint epochs yield a bimodal spectrum, and the paper's $\epsilon_g$, $T_g$ variables are the natural coordinates for computing such cases, so the framework extends to mechanism pairs (for instance decay plus resonant oscillation under a lepton asymmetry) that are not separately tabulated here.
  • Extension: the benchmark models predict two breaks in the matter power spectrum at Lyman-$\alpha$ scales; a measurement that resolves two suppression scales rather than one would distinguish multi-population sterile neutrinos from single-component warm dark matter even when the average momenta agree.
  • Extension: if active neutrino flavor oscillations equilibrate the lepton asymmetries above 10 MeV, the relevant input becomes the total lepton number rather than $L_e$ alone, and recomputing the benchmark regions of Figs. 8–9 with flavor-equilibrated initial conditions would directly test the paper's load-bearing assumption.
  • Extension: the claim that antineutrino conversions roughly double the warm population implies a relic sterile neutrino–antineutrino asymmetry in the oscillation scenario; a future cosmic-neutrino-background measurement with flavor or particle–antiparticle sensitivity would see an excess of sterile neutrinos over sterile antineutrinos there, unlike the PBH and decay scenarios, which produce them sy
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper argues that a single sterile neutrino species can be produced by several distinct mechanisms operating at different cosmological epochs, resulting in a multi-modal relic momentum distribution with cold and warm components. It analyzes four production scenarios: resonant plus non-resonant active-sterile oscillations in the presence of a primordial lepton asymmetry, two monochromatic primordial black hole (PBH) populations via Hawking evaporation, heavy singlet scalar or inflaton decays combined with oscillations, and PBH neutrinogenesis combined with scalar decays. The main quantitative results are the two-population oscillation parameter region for sterile neutrino masses around 4-10 keV, mixing angles 10^-12 to 10^-9, and initial electron lepton asymmetries 10^-3 to 4 x 10^-3, with benchmark models where the combined abundance gives f_s,DM ~ 1 while evading X-ray and Lyman-alpha constraints. The paper also computes full momentum distributions and maps warm dark matter constraints onto each population.

Significance. If the central claim holds, sterile neutrino dark matter can have a two-component momentum structure that changes the mapping of cosmological constraints and the predictions for structure formation. The paper's strengths include a systematic numerical treatment with temperature-dependent degrees of freedom, explicit inclusion of antineutrino conversions in lepton asymmetry evolution, refined analytic conditions for the two-population regime, and concrete benchmark models in four distinct production scenarios. The two-population oscillation scenario, where a resonantly produced cool population is followed by a non-resonant warm population, is a genuinely useful extension of earlier single-mechanism treatments. The results are largely derived from standard Boltzmann methods and are falsifiable through X-ray line searches and Lyman-alpha observations, which adds to their value.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 2.1, Eqs. (2.8), (2.19), (2.20)] The central two-population oscillation results rely on the semiclassical relaxation-time Boltzmann equation with the back-reaction term f_nu_s neglected in Eq. (2.8). The manuscript states that this reduction is accurate and cites Refs. [39,40], and it argues that the regime of collisional decoherence dominates for ms > keV, but it does not demonstrate that the quantum-Zeno condition and the neglect of f_nu_s hold along the narrow resonance branches epsilon^±_res, particularly near the termination temperature T_end where the damping factor D in Eq. (2.20) is small. Because the cool/warm split and T_end are set by lepton-asymmetry depletion, any quantum-kinetic correction to the resonant conversion rate could shift the boundaries in Figs. 8-9 and the benchmark abundances in Table 1. I request a direct check for representative benchmark points, for example a comparison with the full quantum kinetic equations of Refs. [37,38], or a quantitative estimate of the error from the cited reductions in the specific region of parameter space explored.
  2. [Sec. 2.4, Eq. (2.33)] The analytic lower bound m_mod_non-res in Eq. (2.33) is computed using the choice L_alpha(T_end) = 0.15 L_alpha,0, while the text states that the numerical L_alpha(T_end) ranges from 0.97 L_alpha,0 to 0.15 L_alpha,0 depending on the mixing angle. Since the bound scales as L_alpha(T_end)^{3/2}, the two extremes differ by roughly a factor of 17. The manuscript does not explain how the value 0.15 is determined; if 0.97 were used instead, the analytic lower bound would move well inside the two-population regions shown in Figs. 8 and 9. Please either derive the depletion factor from the Boltzmann evolution or map the dependence of the analytic containment on this choice.
  3. [Appendix B and Fig. 6] The numerical results in Tables 1-4 and the parameter boundaries in Figs. 8-9 are presented without quantified accuracy. The only accuracy statement is the note in the Fig. 6 caption that the spectra are binned in intervals of Delta_epsilon_ref = 0.1 to smooth numerical fluctuations due to the rapid evolution of the resonance curves. No convergence tests with respect to the adaptive temperature step size or the momentum binning are reported, and no error estimates are given for the quoted f_s,DM values. Since the paper's central quantitative claims are the specific benchmark abundances and parameter-space boundaries, please provide convergence tests and error estimates for representative points, especially near T_end where very small step sizes are required.
  4. [Sec. 5, Tables 1 and 4] The claim that the benchmark models satisfy the Lyman-alpha constraints is not transparently verified. For each benchmark, the allowed warm fraction f_warm^s,lim from Ref. [20] is not reported, and the margin is not shown. A quick estimate using Eq. (5.2) for Table 1 models 1-3 gives an effective thermal mass m_therm near or below 1 keV for the warm component with fraction ~0.1, which is in the regime where the Lyman-alpha bound becomes restrictive; for Table 4 model 3, a 50% warm fraction maps to m_therm of order 2.8 keV, which may be disfavored. Please list the adopted f_warm^s,lim values for each benchmark and confirm explicitly that the quoted parameters satisfy the 2-sigma limits, or adjust the benchmark claims accordingly.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (3.22)] Eq. (3.22) contains typographical errors in the g* factors: the parentheses are unbalanced in "g*(T_form,1" and "g*(T_form,2". Please correct these expressions.
  2. [Sec. 2.3, Eq. (2.23)] In Eq. (2.23) the variable T is used for both the physical temperature and the generalized temperature T_g introduced in Eq. (2.3). Please use T_g consistently in this equation and its surrounding discussion to avoid confusion.
  3. [Figs. 4 and 5 captions] The captions state that Delta f_nu_s is "redshifted to the reference temperature T = 3 MeV," but the exact relation between ϵ_ref and the comoving variable ϵ_g is not repeated in the captions. A brief restatement of Eq. (2.27) would improve readability.
  4. [Sec. 5] The paper quotes the 2-sigma Lyman-alpha limits from Ref. [20] and states the m_therm = 5.7 keV cold/warm boundary, but it does not provide the function or table that maps (1/m_therm, f_WDM) to the allowed fraction. Including the explicit used curve or a reference to the specific figure in Ref. [20] would make the constraint mapping reproducible.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

The central two-population claim is a genuine numerical result; only the auxiliary analytic bounds in Sec. 2.4 are partly calibrated to the numerics, giving a minor circularity.

  1. other [Sec. 2.4, Eq. (2.33) and Figs. 8–9]
    "In the parameter space shown in Fig. 8 and Fig. 9 (1 keV≤ms≤100 keV and 10−13≤ sin2 2θ ≲ 2×10−9), our numerical results find that Lα(Tend) ranges from approximately 0.97Lα,0 to 0.15Lα,0 depending on the mixing. For our new estimate of the lower mass limit, mmod non−res, we consider Lα(Tend)≃ 0.15Lα,0. ... We confirm with numerical analysis (see Figs. 8 and 9) that the two-population regimes are indeed contained within the analytic ranges we derive."

    The analytic lower bound mmod_nonres in Eq. (2.33) is presented as a derived necessary condition and is then used to 'confirm' the numerical two-population region, but the specific choice Lα(Tend)=0.15Lα,0 is extracted from the very numerical scan being confirmed. The analytic envelope is therefore calibrated to the numerics rather than independent of it, so the agreement in Figs. 8–9 is partly by construction. This is a minor circularity of the auxiliary analytic estimate; the central claim (the two-population spectrum and abundance map) is obtained by direct integration of Eq. (2.8), not from these bounds.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is not circular. The sterile neutrino momentum distributions in Secs. 2–4 are obtained by numerically integrating Eq. (2.8) with the conversion rates of Eqs. (2.19)–(2.21); no parameter is fitted to the claimed output, and the benchmark abundances in Tables 1–4 are direct outputs of this integration. The relaxation-time and conservative-scattering reductions are attributed to external references [39,40], and the production machinery to [41,42]. The cool/warm separation is a definition, but the underlying multi-peaked spectrum is independent numerical output. The analytic conditions in Sec. 2.4 are auxiliary and one of them, mmod_nonres, uses Lα(Tend)=0.15Lα,0 taken from the numerics, so its agreement with the scan is partly calibrated; this is a minor circularity in the analytic confirmation, not in the central result. Self-citations [25,26,49,57,61] supply earlier approximate conditions and PBH machinery, but the central numerical scan is presented as new and does not reduce to those citations. Concerns about the semiclassical reduction at resonance are validity/correctness issues, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All quantitative outputs rest on the Boltzmann machinery of Sec. 2 and the benchmark parameter choices in Tabs. 1-4. No genuinely new particles are postulated: sterile neutrinos, primordial black holes and singlet scalars all come from prior literature. The main credit-debt is the asserted regime of validity of the semiclassical Boltzmann reduction at resonance, plus roughly a dozen model parameters that are scanned rather than derived. The analytic mass bounds (Eqs. 2.33, 2.35) are derived, not fitted, and they are consistent with the numerically identified two-population regions, which is the strongest independent support in the paper.

free parameters (6)
  • sterile neutrino mass m_s = 4.3 to 15 keV (Tab. 1); 10^5 to 2x10^6 keV (Tab. 2); 7.1 to 8.1 keV (Tab. 3); 20 to 4x10^3 keV (Tab. 4)
    Scanned over the 1 keV to 100 keV range and chosen per benchmark model; benchmark values are tuned so the combined population gives f_s,DM ~ 1 (Tab. 1 caption states this explicitly).
  • active-sterile mixing sin^2(2theta) = 1.1e-10 to 6e-10 (Tab. 1); 5e-11 to 1.8e-9 (Tab. 3)
    Scanned over 10^-13 to 3x10^-9; benchmark values selected to hit target abundances and, for Model 3 of Tab. 1 and Model 1 of Tab. 3, to match the 3.5 keV X-ray line interpretation.
  • initial electron lepton asymmetry L_e,0 = 1.2e-3 to 3.65e-3 (Tab. 1); Figs. 8-9 use 10^-3 and 4x10^-3
    Input parameter chosen in the range allowed before BBN/CMB constraints apply; directly controls the resonant production phase.
  • PBH masses M1, M2 and initial fractions beta1, beta2 = Tab. 2: M1 = 1 to 3e3 g, M2 = 66 to 1.6e5 g; beta ~ 1e-12 to 1e-9
    Chosen so the two evaporation populations each contribute about half of the DM (Tab. 2).
  • singlet scalar mass m_chi and Yukawa coupling y_I = Tab. 3: m_chi = 250 to 670 GeV, y_I = 2e-8 to 3e-8; Tab. 4: m_chi = 0.3 to 600 GeV, y_I = 3.7e-11 to 9.2e-10
    Chosen to give f_dec_s,DM ~ 0.5 to 1 for the benchmark decay scenarios.
  • depleted lepton asymmetry ratio L_alpha(T_end)/L_alpha,0 = 0.15 (Eq. 2.33)
    Hand-chosen depletion estimate used for the analytic lower mass bound m^mod_non-res; the paper states numerical results give 0.15 to 0.97 depending on mixing, so the bound uses the most favorable value.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption The semiclassical relaxation-time Boltzmann equation accurately describes resonant and non-resonant active-sterile production in the parameter space considered
    Invoked in Sec. 2.1.0, Eqs. (2.1)-(2.8), citing Refs. [37-39]; collisional decoherence must dominate for this reduction to hold, asserted at the end of Sec. 2.1.
  • domain assumption Back-reaction term proportional to f_nu_s is negligible because n_nu_s << n_nu_alpha throughout
    Used to drop f_nu_s in Eq. (2.8); the paper states sterile neutrinos never reach equilibrium but provides no quantitative check in the resonant regime.
  • domain assumption Conservative scattering: active neutrino converts to sterile neutrino of the same momentum
    Stated in Sec. 2.1.0 as introducing negligible errors, citing Ref. [40].
  • domain assumption Active neutrinos and antineutrinos remain in thermal Fermi-Dirac distributions with a single chemical potential xi while the lepton asymmetry is depleted
    Eqs. (2.9)-(2.10), Sec. 2.1; the departure from equilibrium is encoded only in the single parameter xi(T_g).
  • domain assumption Only the electron flavor carries an initial lepton asymmetry (L_mu, L_tau = 0), and active neutrino flavor oscillations are neglected below T ~ 10 MeV
    Sec. 2.1; the paper acknowledges active flavor oscillations could equilibrate asymmetries and reheat the plasma (Refs. [52-55]) but omits them on the grounds that the sterile population is frozen in by T ~ 10 MeV.
  • domain assumption PBHs form from collapse of horizon-sized density perturbations with gamma ~ 0.2 and evaporate with g_H = 110 degrees of freedom
    Sec. 3.1, Eqs. (3.1)-(3.5), citing Ref. [63] and Page [64]; results are stated to generalize to other formation mechanisms.
  • domain assumption The function y_e(T_g) fitted to equilibrium-rate computations in Ref. [47] carries errors of at most 20%
    Sec. 2.1.0; used in the collision rate Eq. (2.21), so all production rates inherit this uncertainty.
  • domain assumption The mapping of Lyman-alpha and strong-lensing limits from thermal relics to sterile neutrinos via Eq. (5.2) is valid for a two-component spectrum
    Sec. 5; the mapping uses the average scaled momentum per population from Refs. [18, 19, 49], and assumes the constraints apply component by component.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multiple Populations of Same Sterile Neutrino as Dark Matter." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WPTZJBLU

@misc{pith2026250717830,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multiple Populations of Same Sterile Neutrino as Dark Matter},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WPTZJBLU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.17830}
}
read the original abstract

Sterile neutrinos produced in the early Universe that mix with active neutrinos of the Standard Model are typically considered to consist of a single population resulting from one dominant production mechanism. We show that the same sterile neutrino species can naturally emerge with multiple population components, yielding a multi-modal relic momentum spectrum. We consider this with four distinct production scenarios: active-sterile non-resonant oscillations following resonant oscillations in the presence of a primordial lepton asymmetry, gravitational production through sterile neutrinogenesis from populations of evaporating primordial black holes, and heavy singlet Higgs or inflaton decays combined with non-resonant active-sterile oscillations or neutrinogenesis. We identify sterile neutrino mass ranges where a colder and a hotter population can be present with similar contributions and can also contribute non-negligibly to the dark matter relic abundance. We discuss some potential consequences of such a multi-population framework.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

  1. [20]

    Garcia-Gallego, V

    O. Garcia-Gallego, V. Irˇ siˇ c, M. G. Haehnelt, M. Viel and J. S. Bolton,Constraining Mixed Dark Matter models with high redshift Lyman-alpha forest data , 2504.06367

    arXiv

  2. [1]

    G. B. Gelmini, The Hunt for Dark Matter , in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Journeys Through the Precision Frontier: Amplitudes for Colliders, pp. 559–616, 2015, 1502.01320, DOI

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  3. [2]

    Bertone and D

    G. Bertone and D. Hooper, History of dark matter , Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 (2018) 045002 [1605.04909]. – 42 –

    arXiv 2018

  4. [3]

    Fukuda et al., Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos, Phys

    Super-Kamiokande collaboration, Y. Fukuda et al., Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 1562 [ hep-ex/9807003]

    arXiv 1998

  5. [4]

    Yanagida, Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos , Conf

    T. Yanagida, Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos , Conf. Proc. C 7902131 (1979) 95

    1979

  6. [5]

    Gell-Mann, P

    M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond and R. Slansky, Complex Spinors and Unified Theories , Conf. Proc. C 790927 (1979) 315 [ 1306.4669]

    arXiv 1979

  7. [6]

    Boyarsky, M

    A. Boyarsky, M. Drewes, T. Lasserre, S. Mertens and O. Ruchayskiy, Sterile neutrino Dark Matter, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 104 (2019) 1 [ 1807.07938]

    arXiv 2019

  8. [7]

    Bulbul, M

    E. Bulbul, M. Markevitch, A. Foster, R. K. Smith, M. Loewenstein and S. W. Randall, Detection of An Unidentified Emission Line in the Stacked X-ray spectrum of Galaxy Clusters , Astrophys. J. 789 (2014) 13 [ 1402.2301]

    arXiv 2014

Show all 81 references
  1. [8]

    Boyarsky, O

    A. Boyarsky, O. Ruchayskiy, D. Iakubovskyi and J. Franse, Unidentified Line in X-Ray Spectra of the Andromeda Galaxy and Perseus Galaxy Cluster , Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 251301 [1402.4119]

    2014 arXiv

  2. [9]

    T. E. Jeltema and S. Profumo, Discovery of a 3.5 keV line in the Galactic Centre and a critical look at the origin of the line across astronomical targets , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 450 (2015) 2143 [ 1408.1699]

    2015 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Dessert, J

    C. Dessert, J. W. Foster, Y. Park and B. R. Safdi, Was There a 3.5 keV Line? , 2309.03254

    arXiv

  4. [11]

    K. C. Y. Ng, B. M. Roach, K. Perez, J. F. Beacom, S. Horiuchi, R. Krivonos et al., New Constraints on Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter from NuSTAR M31 Observations, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 083005 [ 1901.01262]

    2019 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Perez, K

    K. Perez, K. C. Y. Ng, J. F. Beacom, C. Hersh, S. Horiuchi and R. Krivonos, Almost closing the νMSM sterile neutrino dark matter window with NuSTAR , Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 123002 [1609.00667]

    2017 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Neronov, D

    A. Neronov, D. Malyshev and D. Eckert, Decaying dark matter search with NuSTAR deep sky observations, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 123504 [ 1607.07328]

    2016 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Dessert, O

    C. Dessert, O. Ning, N. L. Rodd and B. R. Safdi, Limits from the grave: resurrecting Hitomi for decaying dark matter and forecasting leading sensitivity for XRISM , 2305.17160

    arXiv

  8. [15]

    Y. Zhou, V. Takhistov and K. Mitsuda, Unlocking Discovery Potential for Decaying Dark Matter and Faint X-Ray Sources with XRISM , Astrophys. J. 976 (2024) 238 [ 2407.18189]

    2024 arXiv

  9. [16]

    W. J. G. de Blok, The Core-Cusp Problem, Adv. Astron. 2010 (2010) 789293 [ 0910.3538]

    2010 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Boylan-Kolchin, J

    M. Boylan-Kolchin, J. S. Bullock and M. Kaplinghat, Too big to fail? The puzzling darkness of massive Milky Way subhaloes , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 415 (2011) L40 [ 1103.0007]

    2011 arXiv

  11. [18]

    M. Viel, J. Lesgourgues, M. G. Haehnelt, S. Matarrese and A. Riotto, Constraining warm dark matter candidates including sterile neutrinos and light gravitinos with WMAP and the Lyman-alpha forest, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 063534 [ astro-ph/0501562]

    2005 arXiv

  12. [19]

    J. Baur, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. Yeche, A. Boyarsky, O. Ruchayskiy, E. Armengaud et al., Constraints from Ly-α forests on non-thermal dark matter including resonantly-produced sterile neutrinos, JCAP 12 (2017) 013 [ 1706.03118]. – 43 –

    2017 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Gilman, S

    D. Gilman, S. Birrer, A. Nierenberg, T. Treu, X. Du and A. Benson, Warm dark matter chills out: constraints on the halo mass function and the free-streaming length of dark matter with eight quadruple-image strong gravitational lenses , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 491 (2020) 60...

    2020 arXiv

  14. [22]

    I. A. Zelko, T. Treu, K. N. Abazajian, D. Gilman, A. J. Benson, S. Birrer et al., Constraints on Sterile Neutrino Models from Strong Gravitational Lensing, Milky Way Satellites, and the Lyman-α Forest, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022) 191301 [ 2205.09777]

    2022 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Dodelson and L

    S. Dodelson and L. M. Widrow, Sterile-neutrinos as dark matter , Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 (1994) 17 [hep-ph/9303287]

    1994 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Shi and G

    X.-D. Shi and G. M. Fuller, A New dark matter candidate: Nonthermal sterile neutrinos , Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 2832 [ astro-ph/9810076]

    1999 arXiv

  17. [25]

    M. Chen, G. B. Gelmini, P. Lu and V. Takhistov, Primordial Black Hole Neutrinogenesis of Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter , 2309.12258

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    M. Chen, G. B. Gelmini, P. Lu and V. Takhistov, Primordial black hole sterile neutrinogenesis: sterile neutrino dark matter production independent of couplings , JCAP 07 (2024) 059 [2312.12136]

    2024 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Koutroulis, O

    F. Koutroulis, O. Lebedev and S. Pokorski, Gravitational production of sterile neutrinos , JHEP 04 (2024) 027 [ 2310.15906]

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Shaposhnikov and I

    M. Shaposhnikov and I. Tkachev, The nuMSM, inflation, and dark matter , Phys. Lett. B 639 (2006) 414 [ hep-ph/0604236]

    2006 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Kusenko, Sterile neutrinos, dark matter, and the pulsar velocities in models with a Higgs singlet, Phys

    A. Kusenko, Sterile neutrinos, dark matter, and the pulsar velocities in models with a Higgs singlet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 241301 [ hep-ph/0609081]

    2006 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Petraki and A

    K. Petraki and A. Kusenko, Dark-matter sterile neutrinos in models with a gauge singlet in the Higgs sector, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 065014 [ 0711.4646]

    2008 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Merle, V

    A. Merle, V. Niro and D. Schmidt, New Production Mechanism for keV Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter by Decays of Frozen-In Scalars , JCAP 03 (2014) 028 [ 1306.3996]

    2014 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Merle and M

    A. Merle and M. Totzauer, keV Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter from Singlet Scalar Decays: Basic Concepts and Subtle Features, JCAP 06 (2015) 011 [ 1502.01011]

    2015 arXiv

  25. [33]

    K. N. Abazajian and A. Kusenko, Hidden treasures: Sterile neutrinos as dark matter with miraculous abundance, structure formation for different production mechanisms, and a solution to the σ8 problem, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 103513 [ 1907.11696]

    2019 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Boyarsky, J

    A. Boyarsky, J. Lesgourgues, O. Ruchayskiy and M. Viel, Realistic sterile neutrino dark matter with keV mass does not contradict cosmological bounds , Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 201304 [0812.3256]

    2009 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Merle and A

    A. Merle and A. Schneider, Production of Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter and the 3.5 keV line , Phys. Lett. B 749 (2015) 283 [ 1409.6311]

    2015 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Merle, A

    A. Merle, A. Schneider and M. Totzauer, Dodelson-Widrow Production of Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter with Non-Trivial Initial Abundance , JCAP 04 (2016) 003 [ 1512.05369]. – 44 –

    2016 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Stodolsky, On the Treatment of Neutrino Oscillations in a Thermal Environment , Phys

    L. Stodolsky, On the Treatment of Neutrino Oscillations in a Thermal Environment , Phys. Rev. D 36 (1987) 2273

    1987

  30. [38]

    B. H. J. McKellar and M. J. Thomson, Oscillating doublet neutrinos in the early universe , Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 2710

    1994

  31. [39]

    Johns, Derivation of the sterile neutrino Boltzmann equation from quantum kinetics , Phys

    L. Johns, Derivation of the sterile neutrino Boltzmann equation from quantum kinetics , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 083536 [ 1908.04244]

    2019 arXiv

  32. [40]

    A. D. Dolgov and S. H. Hansen, Massive sterile neutrinos as warm dark matter , Astropart. Phys. 16 (2002) 339 [ hep-ph/0009083]

    2002 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Abazajian, G

    K. Abazajian, G. M. Fuller and M. Patel, Sterile neutrino hot, warm, and cold dark matter , Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 023501 [ astro-ph/0101524]

    2001 arXiv

  34. [42]

    C. T. Kishimoto and G. M. Fuller, Lepton-number-driven sterile neutrino production in the early universe, Physical Review D 78 (2008)

    2008

  35. [43]

    Borsanyi et al., Calculation of the axion mass based on high-temperature lattice quantum chromodynamics, Nature 539 (2016) 69 [ 1606.07494]

    S. Borsanyi et al., Calculation of the axion mass based on high-temperature lattice quantum chromodynamics, Nature 539 (2016) 69 [ 1606.07494]

    2016 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Abazajian, N

    K. Abazajian, N. F. Bell, G. M. Fuller and Y. Y. Y. Wong, Cosmological lepton asymmetry, primordial nucleosynthesis, and sterile neutrinos , Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 063004 [astro-ph/0410175]

    2005 arXiv

  37. [45]

    N. F. Bell, R. R. Volkas and Y. Y. Y. Wong, Relic neutrino asymmetry evolution from first principles, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 113001

    1999

  38. [46]

    Kasai, M

    K. Kasai, M. Kawasaki and K. Murai, Affleck-Dine leptogenesis scenario for resonant production of sterile neutrino dark matter , JCAP 08 (2024) 008 [ 2402.11902]

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Asaka, M

    T. Asaka, M. Laine and M. Shaposhnikov, Lightest sterile neutrino abundance within the nuMSM, JHEP 01 (2007) 091 [ hep-ph/0612182]

    2007 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Tanabashi, K

    Particle Data Group collaboration, M. Tanabashi, K. Hagiwara, K. Hikasa, K. Nakamura, Y. Sumino, F. Takahashi et al., Review of particle physics , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 030001

    2018

  41. [49]

    G. B. Gelmini, P. Lu and V. Takhistov, Cosmological Dependence of Non-resonantly Produced Sterile Neutrinos, JCAP 12 (2019) 047 [ 1909.13328]

    2019 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Mangano, G

    G. Mangano, G. Miele, S. Pastor, O. Pisanti and S. Sarikas, Updated BBN bounds on the cosmological lepton asymmetry for non-zero θ13, Phys. Lett. B 708 (2012) 1 [ 1110.4335]

    2012 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Barenboim, W

    G. Barenboim, W. H. Kinney and W.-I. Park, Resurrection of large lepton number asymmetries from neutrino flavor oscillations , Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 043506 [ 1609.01584]

    2017 arXiv

  44. [52]

    A. D. Dolgov, S. H. Hansen, S. Pastor, S. T. Petcov, G. G. Raffelt and D. V. Semikoz, Cosmological bounds on neutrino degeneracy improved by flavor oscillations , Nucl. Phys. B 632 (2002) 363 [ hep-ph/0201287]

    2002 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Lattanzi and M

    M. Lattanzi and M. Moretti, Lepton Asymmetries in Cosmology , Symmetry 16 (2024) 1657

    2024

  46. [54]

    Froustey and C

    J. Froustey and C. Pitrou, Constraints on primordial lepton asymmetries with full neutrino transport, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 103551 [ 2405.06509]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Domcke, M

    V. Domcke, M. Escudero, M. Fernandez Navarro and S. Sandner, Lepton flavor asymmetries: from the early Universe to BBN , JHEP 06 (2025) 137 [ 2502.14960]. – 45 –

    2025 arXiv

  48. [56]

    G. B. Gelmini, P. Lu and V. Takhistov, Addendum: Cosmological dependence of non-resonantly produced sterile neutrinos, 2006.09553

    2006 arXiv

  49. [57]

    G. B. Gelmini, P. Lu and V. Takhistov, Cosmological Dependence of Resonantly Produced Sterile Neutrinos, JCAP 06 (2020) 008 [ 1911.03398]

    2020 arXiv

  50. [58]

    K. N. Abazajian, Resonantly Produced 7 keV Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter Models and the Properties of Milky Way Satellites , Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 161303 [ 1403.0954]

    2014 arXiv

  51. [59]

    C. T. Kishimoto, G. M. Fuller and C. J. Smith, Coherent Active-Sterile Neutrino Flavor Transformation in the Early Universe , Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 141301 [ astro-ph/0607403]

    2006 arXiv

  52. [60]

    E. L. Horner, F. M. Wulftange, I. A. Ianora and C. T. Kishimoto, Exploring resonantly produced mixed sterile neutrino dark matter models , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 083503 [ 2306.16532]

    2023 arXiv

  53. [61]

    G. B. Gelmini, M. Kawasaki, A. Kusenko, K. Murai and V. Takhistov, Big Bang Nucleosynthesis constraints on sterile neutrino and lepton asymmetry of the Universe , JCAP 09 (2020) 051 [ 2005.06721]

    2020 arXiv

  54. [62]

    XRISM Science Team collaboration, Science with the X-ray Imaging and Spectroscopy Mission (XRISM), 2003.04962

    2003 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Sasaki, T

    M. Sasaki, T. Suyama, T. Tanaka and S. Yokoyama, Primordial black holes—perspectives in gravitational wave astronomy, Class. Quant. Grav. 35 (2018) 063001 [ 1801.05235]

    2018 arXiv

  56. [64]

    D. N. Page, Particle Emission Rates from a Black Hole: Massless Particles from an Uncharged, Nonrotating Hole, Phys. Rev. D 13 (1976) 198

    1976

  57. [65]

    Hooper, G

    D. Hooper, G. Krnjaic and S. D. McDermott, Dark Radiation and Superheavy Dark Matter from Black Hole Domination , JHEP 08 (2019) 001 [ 1905.01301]

    2019 arXiv

  58. [66]

    De Romeri, D

    V. De Romeri, D. Karamitros, O. Lebedev and T. Toma, Neutrino dark matter and the Higgs portal: improved freeze-in analysis , JHEP 10 (2020) 137 [ 2003.12606]

    2020 arXiv

  59. [67]

    De Gouvˆ ea, M

    A. De Gouvˆ ea, M. Sen, W. Tangarife and Y. Zhang, Dodelson-Widrow Mechanism in the Presence of Self-Interacting Neutrinos , Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 081802 [ 1910.04901]

    2020 arXiv

  60. [68]

    K. J. Kelly, M. Sen, W. Tangarife and Y. Zhang, Origin of sterile neutrino dark matter via secret neutrino interactions with vector bosons , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 115031 [ 2005.03681]

    2020 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Chichiri, G

    C. Chichiri, G. B. Gelmini, P. Lu and V. Takhistov, Cosmological dependence of sterile neutrino dark matter with self-interacting neutrinos , JCAP 09 (2022) 036 [ 2111.04087]

    2022 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Gelmini, S

    G. Gelmini, S. Palomares-Ruiz and S. Pascoli, Low reheating temperature and the visible sterile neutrino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 081302 [ astro-ph/0403323]

    2004 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Gelmini, E

    G. Gelmini, E. Osoba, S. Palomares-Ruiz and S. Pascoli, MeV sterile neutrinos in low reheating temperature cosmological scenarios, JCAP 10 (2008) 029 [ 0803.2735]

    2008 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Rehagen and G

    T. Rehagen and G. B. Gelmini, Effects of kination and scalar-tensor cosmologies on sterile neutrinos, JCAP 06 (2014) 044 [ 1402.0607]

    2014 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Baldes, Q

    I. Baldes, Q. Decant, D. C. Hooper and L. Lopez-Honorez, Non-Cold Dark Matter from Primordial Black Hole Evaporation , JCAP 08 (2020) 045 [ 2004.14773]

    2020 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Inomata, M

    K. Inomata, M. Kawasaki, K. Mukaida, T. Terada and T. T. Yanagida, Gravitational Wave – 46 – Production right after a Primordial Black Hole Evaporation , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 123533 [2003.10455]

    2020 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Papanikolaou, V

    T. Papanikolaou, V. Vennin and D. Langlois, Gravitational waves from a universe filled with primordial black holes , JCAP 03 (2021) 053 [ 2010.11573]

    2021 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Dom` enech, C

    G. Dom` enech, C. Lin and M. Sasaki, Gravitational wave constraints on the primordial black hole dominated early universe , JCAP 04 (2021) 062 [ 2012.08151]

    2021 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Dom` enech, V

    G. Dom` enech, V. Takhistov and M. Sasaki,Exploring evaporating primordial black holes with gravitational waves, Phys. Lett. B 823 (2021) 136722 [ 2105.06816]

    2021 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Seljak, A

    U. Seljak, A. Makarov, P. McDonald and H. Trac, Can sterile neutrinos be the dark matter? , Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 191303 [ astro-ph/0602430]

    2006 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Abazajian and S

    K. Abazajian and S. M. Koushiappas, Constraints on Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter , Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 023527 [ astro-ph/0605271]

    2006 arXiv

  72. [80]

    M. Viel, J. Lesgourgues, M. G. Haehnelt, S. Matarrese and A. Riotto, Can sterile neutrinos be ruled out as warm dark matter candidates? , Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 071301 [astro-ph/0605706]

    2006 arXiv

  73. [81]

    M. Viel, G. D. Becker, J. S. Bolton and M. G. Haehnelt, Warm dark matter as a solution to the small scale crisis: New constraints from high redshift Lyman- α forest data, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 043502 [ 1306.2314]. – 47 –

    2013 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.