Hyperonic degrees of freedom in binary neutron star mergers

Andreas Bauswein; Angels Ramos; Georgios Lioutas; Hristijan Kochankovski; Laura Tolos; Sebastian Blacker

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 24 references

Hyperonic degrees of freedom in binary neutron star mergers

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Thermally produced hyperons shift the dominant postmerger gravitational-wave frequency upward by 2–4% relative to purely nucleonic matter, cool the remnant, and lower the prompt-collapse threshold by about 0.05 solar masses.

desk verdict A clear conference review of the authors' own PRD results, with no new simulations; useful as a compact summary, but the abstract oversells it as new work. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.18213 v1 pith:UIHWBO3B submitted 2025-07-24 astro-ph.HE nucl-th

Laura Tolos , Hristijan Kochankovski , Angels Ramos , Georgios Lioutas , Sebastian Blacker , Andreas Bauswein This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.HEnucl-th

keywords binaryneutronstarmergershyperonsequationofstatepostmergergravitationalwavesthermalindexpromptblackholeformationtidaldeformabilitymassejection

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that hyperons—strange baryons that may appear in neutron star cores—are not invisible to binary neutron star merger observations, because they change how matter heats and presses at high density. Running a large set of simulations with hyperonic and purely nucleonic equations of state, it finds that thermally produced hyperons reduce thermal pressure and increase specific heat, producing a characteristic upward shift of 2–4% in the dominant postmerger gravitational-wave frequency, lower remnant temperatures, tentatively enhanced mass ejection, and a prompt black-hole formation threshold about 0.05 solar masses lower than nucleonic models with similar cold-star properties. These are observable discriminators for strangeness in the neutron star interior, available even when cold masses and radii look the same.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the thermal index $\Gamma_{\rm th}=1+P_{\rm th}/\epsilon_{\rm th}$, which drops markedly when hyperons are thermally produced because the thermal pressure is strongly reduced; the paper tracks this through the normalized hyperon excess $\Delta\rho_Y$. The argument then compares two simulations for each equation of state: one with the full temperature-, density-, and composition-dependent table, and one using the cold $\beta$-equilibrium slice plus an approximate treatment with a constant $\Gamma_{\rm th}=1.75$ intended to mimic purely nucleonic matter. The difference in the postmerger frequency, $\Delta f=f_{\rm peak}-f_{\rm peak}^{1.75}$, isolates the non-nucleonic thermal behavior that the paper attributes to hyperons and, in some models, $\Delta$ baryons.

What would settle it

Rerun the same merger setups with a purely nucleonic equation of state whose thermal index varies with density and temperature according to a microscopic calculation, and compare its postmerger frequency with the cold-slice baseline: if that model already shows an upward shift of 2–4%, the hyperon interpretation of the offset would be undermined. Conversely, a future high-signal postmerger gravitational-wave detection with a measured dominant frequency that sits on the nucleonic fit line for its inferred tidal deformability would contradict the claimed hyperon signature.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that hyperonic equations of state leave a systematic imprint on merger observables through their finite-temperature behavior. Compared with the same models treated with a purely nucleonic thermal index, hyperonic models shift the dominant postmerger gravitational-wave frequency upward by 2–4%, and they stand out from the nucleonic relation between this frequency and the tidal deformability of a 1.65 solar mass star. The remnant's mass-averaged temperature is lower because hyperonic matter has a larger specific heat, the ejected mass is tentatively larger for a given stellar radius, and the threshold binary mass for prompt collapse is reduced by about 0.05 solar masses. The paper presents these as signatures that could, in principle, identify hyperons in future high-accuracy gravitational-wave and electromagnetic measurements.

Load-bearing premise

The comparison assumes that the simple recipe used to mimic purely nucleonic heating—a fixed ratio of thermal pressure to thermal energy of 1.75—is faithful across the densities and temperatures of the merger; if real nucleonic matter heats differently, part of the frequency shift attributed to hyperons could be an artifact of that baseline.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A future measurement of the postmerger frequency together with the tidal deformability from the inspiral could flag strangeness: hyperonic models sit above the nucleonic $f_{\rm peak}$–$\Lambda_{1.65}$ relation for a given tidal deformability.
Hyperonic remnants stay cooler because of the larger specific heat, so the mass- and time-averaged remnant temperature is lower than in nucleonic models with the same radius.
With hyperons present, the ejected mass tends to be larger for a given cold-star radius, which would make r-process and kilonova signatures somewhat brighter for the same inspiral parameters.
The threshold binary mass for prompt black-hole formation is about 0.05 $M_{\odot}$ lower for hyperonic models, so a well-measured prompt-collapse threshold below the nucleonic expectation would support hyperon formation.
The frequency shift appears only when the remnant density exceeds the density at which hyperons appear, so the signature is tied to sufficiently massive or asymmetric mergers.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural reading is that the 2–4% frequency offset is a differential prediction that sidesteps many absolute uncertainties: each equation of state is compared with itself, so the main systematic risk is the fidelity of the $\Gamma_{\rm th}=1.75$ nucleonic baseline rather than the cold equation of state.
If confirmed, this would resolve the traditional hyperon puzzle dynamically: hyperons could coexist with two-solar-mass cold stars and still be detectable through merger thermodynamics rather than through mass-radius relations.
A natural next test would be to compute the same frequency shift with neutrino transport and magnetic fields included, since both can change remnant temperatures and could either enhance or dilute the thermal-pressure contrast.
Because models with Delta baryons behave like the hyperonic ones in the paper, distinguishing which exotic species appears would likely need additional observables, such as the detailed ejecta composition or the late-time cooling of the remnant.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this is a HADRON2025 proceedings paper that reviews the authors' own recent simulations (Refs. [11,12]). No new simulations, derivations, or analyses appear anywhere in the body. The reader's novelty = 0 is right. The abstract, however, says "By running a large set of simulations, we study..." which implies new runs; the paper then says "we review these latest results." That mismatch should be corrected before this gets cited as a primary source.

What the paper does well: it gives a compact and readable summary of a physically credible effect. Thermally produced hyperons (and deltas) have a large heat capacity and reduce thermal pressure relative to nucleonic models, so the same deposited energy produces a lower temperature and less pressure support. The review shows this consistently across a large sample of hyperonic EoSs, and it is honest about the soft spots: mass ejection is "tentatively enhanced" and "not generic and universal," and the threshold-mass statement requires precise knowledge of cold NS parameters. The definition of the signal (difference between full-EoS runs and barotropic runs with Gamma_th = 1.75) is stated clearly.

The main unaddressed gap is strangeness equilibration. The simulations use full EoS tables in (presumably) weak equilibrium, with no explicit net-strangeness evolution or weak rates. The postmerger remnant lives a few milliseconds. If hyperon production lags equilibrium, the 2-4% frequency shift, the lower remnant temperature, and the ~0.05 Msun threshold shift are upper bounds. This is a genuine caveat, not a demonstrated fatal flaw: even partial strangeness production would push the observables in the same direction, and the qualitative conclusion would survive. But the review should flag it.

The Gamma_th = 1.75 baseline is a secondary concern. The hyperonic signal is defined by deviation from that baseline, and the nucleonic models scatter around zero shift in Fig. 2, which gives some confidence. Still, a density-dependent nucleonic thermal index could shift the baseline in the same direction. Minor.

Bottom line: if you need a page-turner summary of this group's hyperon-merger program, this is fine. If you want the actual evidence, go to Refs. [11,12]. I would not cite this review in my own work, and a serious journal editor should desk-reject it as a research submission; it is a proceedings summary, not a standalone claim. For a proceedings volume, it is acceptable as-is.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reviews the authors' recent numerical studies of binary neutron star (BNS) mergers with equations of state (EoSs) that include hyperons and Δ baryons, and compares them with purely nucleonic EoSs. The central comparison is between fully temperature-dependent EoS simulations and simulations using the same cold EoS slice supplemented with a constant thermal index Γ_th = 1.75. On this basis, the paper reports four effects: (i) hyperonic models shift the dominant postmerger gravitational-wave frequency f_peak upward by 2–4% for systems reaching sufficiently high density; (ii) in the f_peak–Λ_1.65 relation, hyperonic models stand out from the nucleonic fit; (iii) remnants from hyperonic EoSs have systematically lower mass-averaged temperatures; (iv) ejecta masses are tentatively enhanced relative to nucleonic models of similar radius, and the threshold mass for prompt black-hole collapse is reduced by about 0.05 M_⊙. The paper explicitly identifies itself as a review of results already published in Refs. [11,12] and includes appropriate caveats such as 'tentatively enhanced' and 'not generic and universal'.

Significance. If the reported effects are robust, they would provide a falsifiable, observationally accessible discriminant for strangeness in neutron star interiors, complementary to cold neutron star mass–radius measurements. The analysis has the strength of being a controlled model comparison: the hyperon signal is not fitted to data, and the same EoS is evolved both with and without the approximate nucleonic thermal treatment, so the quoted shifts are attributable to the finite-temperature hyperonic behavior within the model assumptions. The manuscript itself is honest about being a proceedings review, and it visibly rests on a large set of EoS models. The main risks to significance are the two assumptions discussed below: the fixed Γ_th = 1.75 nucleonic baseline and the instantaneous equilibrium of strangeness in the merger remnant.

major comments (3)

[Sec. 3] The definition of Δf = f_peak − f_peak^{1.75} makes the constant Γ_th = 1.75 baseline load-bearing for the 2–4% frequency shift claimed in Sec. 4. The manuscript states that Γ_th = 1.75 'reproduces well the thermal behaviour of purely nucleonic EoSs', but Fig. 1 (left) shows a nontrivial density dependence for the nucleonic models. If the true nucleonic thermal index in the postmerger density–temperature regime deviates from 1.75, part of the shift attributed to hyperons would be a baseline artifact. Please quantify this by repeating the baseline runs with a density-dependent nucleonic Γ_th(ρ) derived from the same nucleonic EoSs, or by showing the residual between Γ_th = 1.75 and the actual nucleonic thermal index over the relevant range.
[Secs. 2–3] The simulations assume that strangeness instantaneously relaxes to the composition tabulated in the finite-temperature EoS at each (T, ρ_B, Y_Q). Section 2 defines Δρ_Y from the EoS at fixed thermodynamic variables, and Section 3 states that the simulations employ the full temperature-, density-, and composition-dependent tables; no weak-interaction rates or evolution equations for net strangeness are included. The postmerger remnant evolves on a few-millisecond timescale, while strangeness-changing weak processes (Λ production/absorption) may have rates comparable to or longer than this dynamical timescale. If thermally produced hyperons lag their equilibrium abundances, the reduced thermal pressure is weaker, and the +2–4% f_peak shift, the lower remnant temperature, and the ~0.05 M_⊙ reduction of M_thres would all be overestimates. Please add a quantitative estimate of this systematic uncertainty, e.g., a strangeness equilibration timescale, a finite-rate simulation comparison, or an explicit statement that this is a known limitation with a bounded effect.
[Figs. 2–4 and Secs. 3–6] The quantitative claims lack uncertainty estimates. Figures 2–4 show no error bars or resolution/convergence information, and the text does not report the SPH particle number, the numerical resolution used for the 1.4–1.4 M_⊙ and asymmetric binaries, or how the results vary with resolution. Since the 2–4% frequency shift is the central discriminator and the mass-ejecta enhancement is explicitly tentative, the reader cannot assess whether these effects exceed the numerical error. Please report the resolution or convergence test, or state explicitly that such information is deferred to Ref. [12] and summarize the relevant error estimates from that paper.

minor comments (5)

[Fig. 1 caption and Sec. 2] In the left panel the thermal index is printed as '□th' rather than 'Γ_th', and the displayed formula for Δρ_Y contains a stray 'Í' where the summation symbol should appear; both are typographical artifacts that should be corrected.
[Sec. 4 and Fig. 2] The quantity ρ_onset is used in Fig. 2 as the normalization for the color bar, but it is not defined in the text; please define it explicitly, for example as the density at which heavy baryons start to appear in β-equilibrium matter at T = 0, or refer to the caption of the figure.
[Sec. 6 and Fig. 4] In the legend of the right panel of Fig. 4, 'hyperons+∆ s' appears to contain a stray 's'; the label should read 'hyperons+Δ' for consistency with the rest of the paper.
[Sec. 3] The manuscript does not state the number of SPH particles or the typical mass resolution for the simulations, and it states only that neutrinos and magnetic fields are not included. For a self-contained proceedings contribution, please add one or two sentences summarizing the numerical setup, or explicitly state that full details are given in Refs. [11,12].
[References] Reference [15] (LIGO/Virgo, GW170817 radius measurement) lacks a complete journal citation; please update it with volume and article number for completeness.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper reviews the authors' own prior simulations, but the hyperon signatures are forward-model outputs, not fitted or definitionally identical to their inputs.

full rationale

The central claims rest on direct comparisons of two simulation sets: one using full temperature-, density-, and composition-dependent EoS tables and one using the same EoS's cold beta-equilibrium slice supplemented by a Gamma_th = 1.75 thermal pressure. The definition Delta f = f_peak - f_1.75_peak explicitly frames the comparison as a measure of deviation from an idealized nucleonic thermal behavior, so the near-zero Delta f for purely nucleonic models is a consistency check of the 1.75 ansatz rather than a fitted prediction. The hyperonic 2-4% upward shift, the lower remnant temperatures, the tentative ejecta enhancement, and the ~0.05 Msun threshold-mass reduction are all outputs of the full-EoS simulations and are not constructed from the quantities they claim to predict. The choice Gamma_th = 1.75 is a stated modeling assumption validated by prior work, not a parameter tuned to the hyperon signal. The paper is explicitly a review ('In the present paper we review these latest results') and reproduces figures from Refs. [11,12]; citing the authors' own earlier simulations is normal provenance for a proceedings review, and the cited papers contain independent numerical results rather than depending on the present claims. The weak-equilibrium assumption for strangeness is a physical approximation that could affect the signal amplitude, but it is not a circularity. No equation in this paper equates a prediction to an input, and no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, fields, or conserved quantities are introduced; the paper only analyzes existing equation of state models. The main input choices are the thermal index baseline and the nucleonic fit curves used for comparison.

free parameters (3)

Thermal index Gamma_th = 1.75
Chosen to represent nucleonic thermal behavior; used to define Delta f and Delta M_thres baselines in Section 3.
Nucleonic fpeak-Lambda_1.65 fit coefficients = not reported
Least-squares quadratic fit to purely nucleonic models in Figure 2; hyperonic models are judged against this baseline.
Nucleonic Mej-R_1.4 fit coefficients = not reported
Parabolic fit to nucleonic models in Figure 4; used to support the claim of enhanced ejecta for hyperonic models.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Conformal flatness approximation for the Einstein field equations
Section 3: the SPH code 'adopts the conformal flatness condition to solve the Einstein field equations'.
domain assumption No neutrinos and no magnetic fields in merger simulations
Section 3: 'neutrinos and magnetic fields are not included'; this can affect temperature, ejecta, and gravitational wave signal.
ad hoc to paper Gamma_th = 1.75 approximates nucleonic thermal behavior
Section 3: chosen because 'it reproduces well the thermal behaviour of purely nucleonic EoSs'; the entire Delta f diagnostic depends on this.
domain assumption The equation of state models used are representative of hyperonic matter
Figures 1-4 use a set of models from Ref. [12]; the conclusions assume this set brackets the range of plausible hyperonic equations of state.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hyperonic degrees of freedom in binary neutron star mergers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UIHWBO3B

@misc{pith2026250718213,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hyperonic degrees of freedom in binary neutron star mergers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UIHWBO3B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.18213}
}

abstract

We analyze the influence of hyperons in binary neutron star mergers considering several different equations of state that include hyperons. By running a large set of simulations, we study the impact of the thermally produced hyperons on the gravitational-wave spectral features, the temperature evolution of the remnant, the mass ejecta and the threshold mass for prompt collapse to a black hole. Models with hyperons tend to stand out in the relation between the dominant postmerger gravitational-wave frequency and the tidal deformability of massive stars. Moreover, the averaged temperature of the remnant is reduced for hyperonic models. The mass ejection of the mergers is tentatively enhanced when hyperons are present in comparison to nucleonic EoSs leading to similar stellar properties of cold neutron stars, whereas the threshold mass for prompt black-hole formation is reduced by about 0.05~$M_\odot$ compared to the nucleonic models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.18213 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Γth (left plot) and Δ𝜌𝑌 (right plot) as functions of density at 𝑌𝑄 = 0.1 and 𝑇 = 25 MeV for different hyperonic (colored curves) and nucleonic (black curves) models. The three nucleonic models are: solid line for SFHO, dashed line for FSU2R and dash-dotted line for DD2. Plots from Ref. [12]. Two sets of simulations with all purely nucleonic and hyperonic models were conducted. First, we performed simulations employi… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Left plot: Δ 𝑓 / 𝑓peak as a function of 𝑓peak. Right plot: 𝑓peak as function of the tidal deformability of a 1.65 𝑀⊙ symmetric BNS merger. The black curve is a least-squares quadratic fit to purely nucleonic models, whereas the gray band shows the maximum residual of purely nucleonic models. Plots from Ref. [12]. To assess the influence of the distinctive finite-temperature behaviour of the hyperonic models on BNS o… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Left plot: Mass averaged temperature (𝑇) of the remnant as a function of time (𝑡) for hyperonic models. With black lines, three nucleonic models (DD2 - dotted line, SFHO - solid line, FSU2R - dashed line) are shown. The vertical lines show the time window to compute the mass and time averaged temperature (𝑇¯). Right plot: 𝑇¯ in the remnant as a function of the radius of a 1.4𝑀⊙ NS. Plots from Ref. [12]. We now analy… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Left plot: 𝑀ej as a function of 𝑅1.4. The black curve shows a parabolic fit to the purely nucleonic models. Right plot: The difference Δ𝑀thres = 𝑀thres − 𝑀1.75 thres as function of 𝑀thres. Plots from Ref. [12]. It is also possible to identify the correlation between th…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

24 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages

[12]

Kochankovski, G

H. Kochankovski, G. Lioutas, S. Blacker, A. Bauswein, A. Ramos and L. Tolos,Impact of hyperons on neutron star mergers: Gravitational waves, mass ejection, and black hole formation,Phys. Rev. D112 (2025) 023014 [2501.12905]

arXiv 2025
[1]

Chatterjee and I

D. Chatterjee and I. Vidaña,Do hyperons exist in the interior of neutron stars?, Eur. Phys. J. A 52(2016) 29 [1510.06306]

arXiv 2016
[2]

Tolos and L

L. Tolos and L. Fabbietti,Strangeness in Nuclei and Neutron Stars,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 112 (2020) 103770 [2002.09223]

arXiv 2020
[3]

P.Demorest,T.Pennucci,S.Ransom,M.RobertsandJ.Hessels, Shapirodelaymeasurement of a two solar mass neutron star,Nature 467(2010) 1081

work page 2010
[4]

Antoniadis et al.,A Massive Pulsar in a Compact Relativistic Binary, Science 340 (2013) 6131 [1304.6875]

J. Antoniadis et al.,A Massive Pulsar in a Compact Relativistic Binary, Science 340 (2013) 6131 [1304.6875]

arXiv 2013
[5]

Fonseca et al.,The NANOGrav Nine-year Data Set: Mass and Geometric Measurements of Binary Millisecond Pulsars, Astrophys

E. Fonseca et al.,The NANOGrav Nine-year Data Set: Mass and Geometric Measurements of Binary Millisecond Pulsars, Astrophys. J.832(2016) 167 [1603.00545]. 6 Hyperonic degrees of freedom in binary neutron star mergers Laura Tolos

arXiv 2016
[6]

NANOGravcollaboration,Relativistic Shapiro delay measurements of an extremely massive millisecond pulsar,Nature Astron.4(2019) 72 [1904.06759]

arXiv 2019
[7]

R.W.Romani, D.Kandel, A.V.Filippenko, T.G.BrinkandW.Zheng, PSRJ0952−0607: The Fastest and Heaviest Known Galactic Neutron Star,Astrophys. J. Lett.934 (2022) L17 [2207.05124]

arXiv 2022

Show all 24 references

[8]

Bauswein, A

A. Bauswein, A. Nikolaidis, G. Lioutas, H. Kochankovski, P. Char, C. Mondal et al.,Stellar properties indicating the presence of hyperons in neutron stars, 2507.10372
[9]

Sekiguchi, K

Y. Sekiguchi, K. Kiuchi, K. Kyutoku and M. Shibata,Effects of hyperons in binary neutron star mergers, Phys. Rev. Lett.107 (2011) 211101 [1110.4442]

2011 arXiv
[10]

Radice, S

D. Radice, S. Bernuzzi, W. Del Pozzo, L.F. Roberts and C.D. Ott,Probing Extreme-Density Matter with Gravitational Wave Observations of Binary Neutron Star Merger Remnants, Astrophys. J. Lett.842(2017) L10 [1612.06429]

2017 arXiv
[11]

Blacker, H

S. Blacker, H. Kochankovski, A. Bauswein, A. Ramos and L. Tolos,Thermal behavior as indicator for hyperons in binary neutron star merger remnants,Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 043015 [2307.03710]

2024 arXiv
[13]

LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett.119 (2017) 161101 [1710.05832]

2017 arXiv
[14]

LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger,Astrophys. J. Lett.848 (2017) L12 [1710.05833]

2017 arXiv
[15]

LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration,GW170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state, Phys. Rev. Lett.121 (2018) 161101 [1805.11581]

2018 arXiv
[16]

LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration collaboration,Properties of the binary neutron star merger gw170817, Phys. Rev. X9 (2019) 011001

2019
[17]

Kochankovski, A

H. Kochankovski, A. Ramos and L. Tolos,Equation of state for hot hyperonic neutron star matter, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.517 (2022) 507 [2206.11266]

2022 arXiv
[18]

Isenberg and J

J. Isenberg and J. Nester,Canonical Gravity, inGeneral Relativity and Gravitation. Vol. 1. One hundred years after the birth of Albert Einstein. Edited by A. Held. New York, vol. 1, p. 23, Jan., 1980

1980
[19]

Wilson, G.J

J.R. Wilson, G.J. Mathews and P. Marronetti,Relativistic numerical model for close neutron-star binaries,Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 1317 [gr-qc/9601017]. 7 Hyperonic degrees of freedom in binary neutron star mergers Laura Tolos

1996 arXiv
[20]

Oechslin, S

R. Oechslin, S. Rosswog and F.K. Thielemann,Conformally flat smoothed particle hydrodynamics: application to neutron star mergers,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 103005 [gr-qc/0111005]

2002 arXiv
[21]

Oechslin, H.T

R. Oechslin, H.T. Janka and A. Marek,Relativistic neutron star merger simulations with non-zero temperature equations of state. I. Variation of binary parameters and equation of state,Astron. Astrophys.467 (2007) 395 [astro-ph/0611047]

2007 arXiv
[22]

Bauswein, R

A. Bauswein, R. Oechslin and H.T. Janka,Discriminating Strange Star Mergers from Neutron Star Mergers by Gravitational-Wave Measurements,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 024012 [0910.5169]

2010 arXiv
[23]

Janka, T

H.T. Janka, T. Zwerger and R. Moenchmeyer,Does artificial viscosity destroy prompt type-II supernova explosions?,Astron. Astrophys.268 (1993) 360

1993
[24]

Bauswein, H.T

A. Bauswein, H.T. Janka and R. Oechslin,Testing Approximations of Thermal Effects in Neutron Star Merger Simulations, Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 084043 [1006.3315]. 8

2010 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [12]

Kochankovski, G

H. Kochankovski, G. Lioutas, S. Blacker, A. Bauswein, A. Ramos and L. Tolos,Impact of hyperons on neutron star mergers: Gravitational waves, mass ejection, and black hole formation,Phys. Rev. D112 (2025) 023014 [2501.12905]

arXiv 2025

[2] [1]

Chatterjee and I

D. Chatterjee and I. Vidaña,Do hyperons exist in the interior of neutron stars?, Eur. Phys. J. A 52(2016) 29 [1510.06306]

arXiv 2016

[3] [2]

Tolos and L

L. Tolos and L. Fabbietti,Strangeness in Nuclei and Neutron Stars,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 112 (2020) 103770 [2002.09223]

arXiv 2020

[4] [3]

P.Demorest,T.Pennucci,S.Ransom,M.RobertsandJ.Hessels, Shapirodelaymeasurement of a two solar mass neutron star,Nature 467(2010) 1081

work page 2010

[5] [4]

Antoniadis et al.,A Massive Pulsar in a Compact Relativistic Binary, Science 340 (2013) 6131 [1304.6875]

J. Antoniadis et al.,A Massive Pulsar in a Compact Relativistic Binary, Science 340 (2013) 6131 [1304.6875]

arXiv 2013

[6] [5]

Fonseca et al.,The NANOGrav Nine-year Data Set: Mass and Geometric Measurements of Binary Millisecond Pulsars, Astrophys

E. Fonseca et al.,The NANOGrav Nine-year Data Set: Mass and Geometric Measurements of Binary Millisecond Pulsars, Astrophys. J.832(2016) 167 [1603.00545]. 6 Hyperonic degrees of freedom in binary neutron star mergers Laura Tolos

arXiv 2016

[7] [6]

NANOGravcollaboration,Relativistic Shapiro delay measurements of an extremely massive millisecond pulsar,Nature Astron.4(2019) 72 [1904.06759]

arXiv 2019

[8] [7]

R.W.Romani, D.Kandel, A.V.Filippenko, T.G.BrinkandW.Zheng, PSRJ0952−0607: The Fastest and Heaviest Known Galactic Neutron Star,Astrophys. J. Lett.934 (2022) L17 [2207.05124]

arXiv 2022