Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Revisiting LLM Reasoning via Information Bottleneck

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2507.18391 v1 pith:HBDKOTBB submitted 2025-07-24 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords reasoningacrossbottleneckcorrectexistinginformationllmsregularization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated remarkable progress in reasoning capabilities through reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR). By leveraging simple rule-based rewards, RL effectively incentivizes LLMs to produce extended chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning trajectories, progressively guiding them toward correct answers. However, existing approaches remain largely heuristic and intuition-driven, limiting the development of principled methodologies. In this paper, we present a theoretical characterization of LLM reasoning grounded in information bottleneck (IB) principle, introducing IB-aware reasoning optimization (IBRO), a framework that encourages reasoning trajectories to be both informative about the final correct answer and generalizable across diverse prompts. We derive a practical token-level surrogate objective and propose an efficient approximation, resulting in the lightweight IB regularization method. This technique integrates seamlessly into existing RL-based post-training frameworks without additional computational overhead, requiring only a one-line code modification. Empirically, we validate IB regularization across multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks and RL algorithms, demonstrating consistent improvements in LLM reasoning performance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Think Through a Bottleneck: Hourglass Reasoning for Rigorous Induction

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Strict stage isolation that passes only a compressed symbolic schema and rule between LLM calls improves few-shot inductive reasoning more than self-refinement or explicit verbalization alone.

  2. Information-Theoretic Limits of Reliability and Scaling in Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A theoretical framework derives a reliability ceiling and a max-form Chinchilla-type scaling law for LLMs from task entropy and dependency spectra.

  3. Beyond Entropy: Correctness-Aware Advantage Shaping via Contrastive Policy Optimization

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CPO uses the log-ratio of reference-guided to vanilla token probabilities as a correctness signal for per-token advantage shaping in RLVR, beating entropy-based methods on math and generalization benchmarks.

Pith tools