Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 33 references

New contribution to the anomalous $\pi^0\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$ decay in SU(2) chiral perturbation theory

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The standard QCD axion cannot explain the π0→γγ width once axion-pion mixing is included.

desk verdict A proceedings-style summary of the authors' own published EPJC result that asserts its central correction without derivation, contains a factor-of-10 numerical error, and overclaims what it rules out. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.18468 v1 pith:3TN4VFIX submitted 2025-07-24 hep-ph hep-ex

Zhen-Yan Lu , Shu-Peng Wang , Qi Lu This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-ex
keywords neutralpiontwo-photondecaychiralanomalyaxion-pionmixingperturbationtheoryQCDaxionaxion-photoncouplinglifetime
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that axion-pion mixing produces a new one-loop correction to the two-photon decay of the neutral pion that earlier calculations missed. The correction is proportional to the axion-photon coupling and to the square of the axion mass, so it is tiny for the classical QCD axion with decay constant around $10^{9}$–$10^{12}$ GeV but can become significant for QCD axions with MeV-scale or heavier masses. Combining the new term with the experimentally measured π0→γγ width, the paper concludes that the standard QCD axion cannot resolve the known ~5% gap between chiral perturbation theory and observation. This matters because the neutral pion's two-photon decay is a classic test of the chiral anomaly, and any new contribution shifts the benchmark for axion searches.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is axion-pion mass mixing: at $\mathcal{O}(p^4)$ the chiral Lagrangian contains a term proportional to $l_7$ that couples the axion direction to the neutral-pion field. After diagonalizing to mass eigenstates, the pion can decay to two photons through a virtual axion, using the same Wess-Zumino-Witten anomaly vertex that controls the standard $\pi^0\to\gamma\gamma$ amplitude. The relation $m_a^2 f_a^2 = z/(z+1)^2 m_\pi^2 f_\pi^2(1+\beta_m)$ is the step that converts the usual $1/f_a^2$ suppression into $m_a^2$ growth, which is what brings MeV-scale axions into the experimentally interesting range.

What would settle it

Measure the $\pi^0\to\gamma\gamma$ width with uncertainty below about 0.1 eV and compare the data with Eq. (13) while varying the assumed axion mass: the predicted $\delta_{\mathrm{mix}}$ grows as $m_a^2$, so a measured width that shows no such mass-dependent shift would rule out the proposed correction. The currently measured width is already the comparison point used by the authors to exclude the standard QCD axion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Working in SU(2) chiral perturbation theory with the Wess-Zumino-Witten anomaly term, the paper computes the full next-to-leading-order decay width $$\Gamma_{\pi\gamma\gamma} = \Gamma_{\pi\gamma\gamma}^{(\mathrm{LO})} \left(1 + \delta_{\mathrm{tree}} + \delta_{\mathrm{mix}}\right)^2.$$ The new piece, $$\delta_{\mathrm{mix}} = 2 l_7 \frac{$m_a^{2}$}{f_\$pi^{2}$(1+\beta_m)} \frac{1-z}{1+z} \left(\frac{E}{C} - \frac{2}{3}\frac{4+z}{1+z}\right),$$ arises from an intermediate axion that mixes with the pion and then converts to two photons, with $l_7$ the low-energy constant that controls axion-pion mixing, $z=m_u/m_d$ the quark-mass ratio, and $E/C$ the ratio of electromagnetic to color anomalies. After using the QCD axion mass-decay-constant relation $m_a^2 f_a^2 = z/(z+1)^2 m_\pi^2 f_\pi^2(1+\beta_m)$, the correction is proportional to $m_a^2$; the paper argues it is analytically unavoidable and was missing from earlier $\pi^0\to\gamma\gamma$ calculations.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the axion is the QCD axion, whose mass and decay constant are locked together by $m_a^2 f_a^2 = z/(z+1)^2 m_\pi^2 f_\pi^2(1+\beta_m)$; if a candidate axion has independent mass and decay constant, as for generic axion-like particles, the claimed $m_a^2$ scaling and the MeV-scale significance do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For conventional QCD axions in the classical window ($f_a \approx 10^9$–$10^{12}$ GeV), $\delta_{\mathrm{mix}}$ is far below the current experimental precision, so the standard $\pi^0\to\gamma\gamma$ prediction is unchanged.
  • For QCD axions with MeV-scale or higher masses, $\delta_{\mathrm{mix}}$ is comparable to other one-loop corrections and must be included in precision analyses of the pion lifetime.
  • Combined with the measured width, the standard QCD axion is ruled out as an explanation of the residual discrepancy between chiral perturbation theory and experiment.
  • Axion-like particles with sizable pion mixing would generate the same type of correction even if their mass and decay constant are not tied by the QCD axion relation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because $\delta_{\mathrm{mix}}$ grows as $m_a^2$, a sub-percent measurement of the neutral pion lifetime could serve as a mass-sensitive probe of MeV-scale axion-like particles, complementing beam-dump and stellar-cooling limits; the paper does not develop this experimental angle.
  • Extending the same mixing calculation to SU(3) chiral perturbation theory, where $\pi^0$, $\eta$, and $\eta'$ mix, would couple $\delta_{\mathrm{mix}}$ to $\eta$- and $\eta'$-related corrections; the combined effect could strengthen or dilute the bound on heavy axions.
  • The same axion-pion mixing diagram should also contribute to $\eta\to\gamma\gamma$ and $\eta'\to\gamma\gamma$ decays, so correlated shifts in those widths are a testable consequence that the paper does not compute.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper claims to compute a new O(p^6) contribution to the π0→γγ decay width arising from axion-pion mixing in SU(2) chiral perturbation theory. The central result is Eq. (13), where δmix is presented as a relative correction to the decay amplitude, proportional to m_a^2 and to the combination (E/C - (2/3)(4+z)/(1+z)), i.e., to the axion-photon coupling. The authors state that this correction is negligible for the classical axion window but may become significant for MeV-scale QCD axions, and they conclude that the standard QCD axion is ruled out as an explanation of the PrimEx-II discrepancy. The derivation of δmix is not shown in the manuscript, and the numerical statement about the discrepancy is in error by an order of magnitude.

Significance. If the claimed correction is correct, it would be a genuine addition to the O(p^6) chiral perturbation theory analysis of the neutral-pion decay, and it would connect axion physics with precision π0 lifetime measurements. The paper correctly uses the WZW Lagrangian and established axion chiral perturbation theory results, and it offers a falsifiable condition: the correction vanishes when the axion-photon coupling vanishes. However, the absence of a derivation for the central formula, the order-of-magnitude error in the discrepancy claim, and the unsupported 'rule out' conclusion substantially limit the significance of the manuscript in its current form.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3, Eq. (13)] The central formula for δmix is stated without derivation. The text does not evaluate any loop integral, does not identify which term in the O(p^6) anomalous Lagrangian or which axion-pion mixing insertion produces the structure 2 l7 m_a^2/(f_pi^2(1+β_m)) (1-z)/(1+z) (E/C - (2/3)(4+z)/(1+z)), and does not explain why the correction is linear in l7. Since this formula is the basis for all subsequent claims, the paper must provide the calculation or give a precise pointer to the corresponding derivation in Ref. [4].
  2. [§3, after Eq. (16)] The text states that Γ(LO)_πγγ = 7.763 eV is 'about 5% lower' than the PrimEx-II result 7.802 eV. The actual difference is 0.039 eV, which is about 0.5%, and this is within the experimental uncertainty of ±0.117 eV. This order-of-magnitude error undermines the framing of an observed discrepancy between chiral perturbation theory and experiment and should be corrected with proper error propagation.
  3. [§4 and Abstract] The conclusion that the standard QCD axion is 'ruled out' as a viable explanation of the discrepancy is not supported by any numerical evaluation in the manuscript. No values of δmix for MeV-scale masses are given, no comparison with the actual 0.5% discrepancy is made, and no uncertainties are quoted. Furthermore, for a QCD axion with a MeV-scale mass, Eq. (14) forces f_a to be of order a few GeV, a regime that is already strongly excluded by laboratory and astrophysical bounds; the paper does not discuss this. The conclusion should be substantially softened or replaced by a quantitative analysis.
  4. [§1 and §3] The paper asserts that this correction 'has been overlooked' and is 'absent in all prior calculations', citing only the authors' own Ref. [4] as previous work on axion contributions to two-photon decays of neutral pions. It is not explained whether the present δmix is the same as, or different from, the result of Ref. [4]. If this manuscript is a proceedings summary of Ref. [4], the relationship should be stated explicitly; if it is a new result, the difference from Ref. [4] should be identified.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Figure 1 caption] The caption contains a typo: the entry '(c)' appears twice, and the final diagram is listed as '(d)'; the intended labeling should be corrected.
  2. [§3, Figure 1 and text] The text refers to 'additional one-loop diagrams', but Figure 1a appears to be a tree-level mass-mixing insertion. The loop order of the diagram and the meaning of 'one-loop' should be clarified.
  3. [References] Reference [20] has the arXiv identifier 'hep-ph/hep-ph/0011377' with a duplicated prefix; it should be 'hep-ph/0011377'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; δmix is an un-fitted expression and the self-citation to Ref. [4] is not used to define or fit the claimed result.

full rationale

The central new quantity δmix in Eq. (13) is a closed expression in established low-energy constants (l7, z, βm) and the same anomaly factor that appears in the axion-photon coupling, Eq. (9). It is not fitted to the PrimEx-II width or to any other data used as an output; the paper quotes a parameter-free prediction and compares it with experiment. The replacement of 1/f_a^2 by m_a^2 via Eq. (14) is imported from Ref. [10], an independent CHPT/lattice-based calculation, and is used only as an algebraic rewrite, not to construct δmix. The proportionality of δmix to gaγγ is a consequence of sharing the same anomalous-parity factor, not an identity that makes the prediction equivalent to its input, since δmix also depends on l7 and on the axion mass through Eq. (14). The novelty claim is supported by Ref. [4], a separate published paper with overlapping authors; although this is a self-citation, it is not invoked as a uniqueness theorem and it does not replace a derivation within the equations of the present text. No equation in the manuscript reduces by construction to its own input, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. The absence of an explicit one-loop computation here is a completeness and verifiability concern, not circularity. Accordingly, the correct circularity finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities and fits no new parameters. It relies entirely on established effective field theory constructions and external low-energy constants. The main load-bearing inputs are the QCD axion mass-decay constant relation and the assumed completeness of the listed O(p^6) operators.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The SU(2) chiral perturbation theory Lagrangian with axion field (Eqs. 2-6) is the correct effective theory at low energies.
    The entire calculation is built on this framework; the paper invokes it without derivation.
  • domain assumption The O(p^6) anomalous Lagrangian from Ref. [21] with only cW_3, cW_7, cW_8, cW_11 relevant is sufficient.
    Used to write delta_tree in Eq. (13); no justification is given for neglecting other O(p^6) operators.
  • domain assumption The QCD axion mass-decay constant relation m_a^2 f_a^2 = z/(z+1)^2 m_pi^2 f_pi^2 (1+beta_m) (Eq. 14) holds.
    This relation lets the authors replace 1/f_a^2 with m_a^2; it is standard for the QCD axion but not for general axion-like particles.
  • domain assumption The low-energy constants l7, z, and the O(p^6) couplings are taken from external fits without quoting values or uncertainties.
    The new correction delta_mix depends on l7 and z, but their numerical inputs are not provided, so the size of the effect cannot be checked.
  • domain assumption The axion-photon coupling formula (Eq. 9) with a model-dependent E/C term is assumed.
    Used to rewrite the correction in terms of g_aγγ; the model dependence of E/C is noted but not treated.
  • domain assumption Only pions and axions are included; eta and eta' mixing is neglected.
    The conclusions acknowledge this limitation in Section 4, so the central result is conditional on neglecting these states.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of New contribution to the anomalous $\pi^0\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$ decay in SU(2) chiral perturbation theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3TN4VFIX

@misc{pith2026250718468,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: New contribution to the anomalous $\pi^0\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$ decay in SU(2) chiral perturbation theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3TN4VFIX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.18468}
}
abstract

The introduction of axions gives rise to additional one-loop diagrams for the two-photon decays of neutral pions via axion-pion mixing. We compute this correction that has been overlooked in existing calculations, within the framework of SU(2) chiral perturbation theory. Our analysis shows that the correction is proportional to the axion-photon coupling and the square of the axion mass. In the classical axion parameter space, this correction is strongly suppressed by the axion decay constant. However, for QCD axions in the MeV or higher mass range, the correction may become significant. Furthermore, when combined with experimental measurements of the decay width of the $\pi^0 \rightarrow \gamma\gamma$ process, our results rule out the standard QCD axion as a viable explanation for the observed discrepancy between chiral perturbation theory predictions and experimental data.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.18468 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The Feynman diagrams contribute to the anomalous decay of neutral pion: (a) axion-pion mass mixing, (b) O(p 6 ) tree-level Lagrangian, (c) the tadpole diagram from WZW Lagrangian, (c) the diagram with one vertex from the WZW Lagrangian and the other from O(p 2 ) Lagrangian, and (d) the diagram with both vertexes taken from LWZW. 4. Conclusions As an effective field theory of the Standard Model at low energies, CHPT … view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [4]

    New axion contribution to the two-photon decays of neutral pions

    Lu, Z.Y.; Huang, Y.; Cheng, J.G.; Lu, Q.; Wang, S.P . New axion contribution to the two-photon decays of neutral pions.Eur. Phys. J. C2025,85, 207, [arXiv:hep-ph/2502.04060]. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13906-7

    work page Pith review arXiv

  2. [1]

    Neutral Pion Lifetime Measurements and the QCD Chiral Anomaly.Rev

    Bernstein, A.M.; Holstein, B.R. Neutral Pion Lifetime Measurements and the QCD Chiral Anomaly.Rev. Mod. Phys.2013,85, 49, [arXiv:hep-ph/1112.4809]. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.85.49

    arXiv 2013

  3. [2]

    Pions: the original Nambu–Goldstone bosons: An introduction and precision pion physics.Eur

    Ananthanarayan, B. Pions: the original Nambu–Goldstone bosons: An introduction and precision pion physics.Eur. Phys. J. ST 2022,231, 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-022-00443-7

    doi:10.1140/epjs/s11734-022-00443-7 2022

  4. [3]

    50 Years of Quantum Chromodynamics.Eur

    Gross, F.; et al. 50 Years of Quantum Chromodynamics.Eur. Phys. J. C2023,83, 1125, [arXiv:hep-ph/2212.11107]. https: //doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11949-2. Proceedings2025,1, 0 6 of 7

    arXiv

  5. [5]

    Opening the Axion Window.Nucl

    Kaplan, D.B. Opening the Axion Window.Nucl. Phys. B1985,260, 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(85)90319-0

    doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90319-0

  6. [6]

    Axion couplings to electroweak gauge bosons.Eur

    Alonso-Álvarez, G.; Gavela, M.B.; Quilez, P . Axion couplings to electroweak gauge bosons.Eur. Phys. J. C2019,79, 223, [arXiv:hep-ph/1811.05466]. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6732-5

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    The landscape of QCD axion models.Phys

    Di Luzio, L.; Giannotti, M.; Nardi, E.; Visinelli, L. The landscape of QCD axion models.Phys. Rept.2020,870, 1–117, [arXiv:hep-ph/2003.01100]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2020.06.002

    arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    Axions and the Strong CP Problem.Rev

    Kim, J.E.; Carosi, G. Axions and the Strong CP Problem.Rev. Mod. Phys.2010,82, 557–602, [arXiv:hep-ph/0807.3125]. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.557

    arXiv 2010

Show all 33 references
  1. [9]

    Invisible Axion Search Methods.Rev

    Sikivie, P . Invisible Axion Search Methods.Rev. Mod. Phys.2021,93, 015004, [arXiv:hep-ph/2003.02206]. https://doi.org/10.110 3/RevModPhys.93.015004

    2021 arXiv

  2. [10]

    The QCD axion, precisely.JHEP2016,01, 034, [arXiv:hep- ph/1511.02867]

    Grilli di Cortona, G.; Hardy, E.; Pardo Vega, J.; Villadoro, G. The QCD axion, precisely.JHEP2016,01, 034, [arXiv:hep- ph/1511.02867]. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2016)034

    2016 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Calculation of the axion mass based on high-temperature lattice quantum chromodynamics.Nature2016, 539, 69–71, [arXiv:hep-lat/1606.07494]

    Borsanyi, S.; et al. Calculation of the axion mass based on high-temperature lattice quantum chromodynamics.Nature2016, 539, 69–71, [arXiv:hep-lat/1606.07494]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20115

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    Equation of state of imbalanced cold matter from chiral perturbation theory.Phys

    Carignano, S.; Mammarella, A.; Mannarelli, M. Equation of state of imbalanced cold matter from chiral perturbation theory.Phys. Rev. D2016,93, 051503, [arXiv:hep-ph/1602.01317]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.051503

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    Thermodynamics and susceptibilities of isospin imbalanced QCD matter.Eur

    Lu, Z.Y.; Xia, C.J.; Ruggieri, M. Thermodynamics and susceptibilities of isospin imbalanced QCD matter.Eur. Phys. J. C2020, 80, 46, [arXiv:hep-ph/1907.11497]. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7614-6

    1907 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Cumulants of the QCD topological charge distribution.Phys

    Guo, F.K.; Meißner, U.G. Cumulants of the QCD topological charge distribution.Phys. Lett. B2015,749, 278–282, [arXiv:hep- ph/1506.05487]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.07.076

    2015 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Chiral Perturbation Theory to One Loop.Annals Phys.1984,158, 142

    Gasser, J.; Leutwyler, H. Chiral Perturbation Theory to One Loop.Annals Phys.1984,158, 142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-491 6(84)90242-2

    1984 doi

  8. [16]

    QCD θ-vacuum energy and axion properties.JHEP2020,05, 001, [arXiv:hep-ph/2003.01625]

    Lu, Z.Y.; Du, M.L.; Guo, F.K.; Meißner, U.G.; Vonk, T. QCD θ-vacuum energy and axion properties.JHEP2020,05, 001, [arXiv:hep-ph/2003.01625]. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2020)001

    2020 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Manifesting the Invisible Axion at Low-energies.Phys

    Georgi, H.; Kaplan, D.B.; Randall, L. Manifesting the Invisible Axion at Low-energies.Phys. Lett. B1986,169, 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(86)90688-X

    doi

  10. [18]

    Light Pseudoscalars, Particle Physics and Cosmology.Phys

    Kim, J.E. Light Pseudoscalars, Particle Physics and Cosmology.Phys. Rept.1987,150, 1–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-157 3(87)90017-2

    1987 doi

  11. [19]

    Axion-pion scattering at finite temperature in chiral perturbation theory and its influence in axion thermalization.Phys

    Wang, J.B.; Guo, Z.H.; Zhou, H.Q. Axion-pion scattering at finite temperature in chiral perturbation theory and its influence in axion thermalization.Phys. Rev. D2024,109, 075030, [arXiv:hep-ph/2312.15240]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.075030

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    Anomalies and WZW term of two flavor QCD.Phys

    Kaiser, R. Anomalies and WZW term of two flavor QCD.Phys. Rev. D2001,63, 076010, [arXiv:hep-ph/hep-ph/0011377]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.63.076010

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    The Anomalous chiral Lagrangian of order O(p 6).Eur

    Bijnens, J.; Girlanda, L.; Talavera, P . The Anomalous chiral Lagrangian of order O(p 6).Eur. Phys. J. C2002,23, 539–544, [arXiv:hep-ph/hep-ph/0110400]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100520100887

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    Electromagnetic corrections in the anomaly sector.JHEP2002,05, 052, [hep-ph/0205232]

    Ananthanarayan, B.; Moussallam, B. Electromagnetic corrections in the anomaly sector.JHEP2002,05, 052, [hep-ph/0205232]. https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2002/05/052

    2002 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Chiral expansions of the π0 lifetime.Phys

    Kampf, K.; Moussallam, B. Chiral expansions of the π0 lifetime.Phys. Rev. D2009,79, 076005, [arXiv:hep-ph/0901.4688]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.79.076005

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    Bose-Einstein Condensation of Dark Matter Axions.Phys

    Sikivie, P .; Yang, Q. Bose-Einstein Condensation of Dark Matter Axions.Phys. Rev. Lett.2009,103, 111301, [arXiv:hep- ph/0901.1106]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.111301

    2009 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Aiming for tops of ALPs with a muon collider.JHEP2024,01, 077, [arXiv:hep- ph/2310.11018]

    Chigusa, S.; Girmohanta, S.; Nakai, Y.; Zhang, Y. Aiming for tops of ALPs with a muon collider.JHEP2024,01, 077, [arXiv:hep- ph/2310.11018]. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2024)077

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Precision measurement of the neutral pion lifetime.Science2020,368, 506–509

    Larin, I.; et al. Precision measurement of the neutral pion lifetime.Science2020,368, 506–509. https://doi.org/10.1126/science. aay6641

    doi

  19. [27]

    Predictions on the second-class current decays τ−→π−η(′) ντ.Phys

    Escribano, R.; Gonzalez-Solis, S.; Roig, P . Predictions on the second-class current decays τ−→π−η(′) ντ.Phys. Rev. D2016, 94, 034008, [arXiv:hep-ph/1601.03989]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.034008

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    Axion-meson mixing in light of recent lattice η–η’ simulations and their two-photon couplings within U(3) chiral theory.JHEP2023,04, 022, [arXiv:hep-ph/2211.02867]

    Gao, R.; Guo, Z.H.; Oller, J.A.; Zhou, H.Q. Axion-meson mixing in light of recent lattice η–η’ simulations and their two-photon couplings within U(3) chiral theory.JHEP2023,04, 022, [arXiv:hep-ph/2211.02867]. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2023)022

    2023 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Isospin-breaking contribution to the model-independent axion-photon-photon coupling in U(3) chiral theory.Eur

    Gao, R.; Hao, J.; Duan, C.G.; Guo, Z.H.; Oller, J.A.; Zhou, H.Q. Isospin-breaking contribution to the model-independent axion-photon-photon coupling in U(3) chiral theory.Eur. Phys. J. C2025,85, 97, [arXiv:hep-ph/2411.06737]. https://doi.org/10.1 140/epjc/s10052-025-13807-9

    arXiv

  22. [30]

    Final state rescattering effects in axio-hadronic η and η’ decays.JHEP2024,07, 264, [arXiv:hep- ph/2402.02993]

    Alves, D.S.M.; Gonzàlez-Solís, S. Final state rescattering effects in axio-hadronic η and η’ decays.JHEP2024,07, 264, [arXiv:hep- ph/2402.02993]. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2024)264. Proceedings2025,1, 0 7 of 7

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Axion production in the η→ππ a decay within SU(3) chiral perturbation theory.JHEP 2024,11, 029, [arXiv:hep-ph/2403.16064]

    Wang, J.B.; Guo, Z.H.; Lu, Z.; Zhou, H.Q. Axion production in the η→ππ a decay within SU(3) chiral perturbation theory.JHEP 2024,11, 029, [arXiv:hep-ph/2403.16064]. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2024)029

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Exploring the axion potential and axion walls in dense quark matter

    Zhang, B.; Castillo, D.E.A.; Grunfeld, A.G.; Ruggieri, M. Exploring the axion potential and axion walls in dense quark matter. Phys. Rev. D2023,108, 054010, [arXiv:hep-ph/2304.10240]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.054010

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    QCD topology and axion properties in an isotropic hot and dense medium.Eur

    Gong, H.F.; Lu, Q.; Lu, Z.Y.; Liu, L.M.; Chen, X.; Wang, S.P . QCD topology and axion properties in an isotropic hot and dense medium.Eur. Phys. J. C2024,84, 1222, [arXiv:hep-ph/2404.15136]. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13595-8. Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note:The state...

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.