pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.18508 · v3 · submitted 2025-07-24 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Resonant enhancement of axion dark matter decay

Yu-Ang Liu , Bilal Ahmad , Nick Houston This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 02:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex
keywords axion dark matterresonant cavitiesPurcell effecttwo-photon decayQCD axionheterodyne detectiondark matter searches
0
0 comments X

The pith

Resonant cavities enhance the spontaneous decay of axion dark matter into two photons.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows that resonant cavities already used for axion-to-photon conversion can also increase the rate at which axions naturally decay into two photons. The enhancement arises from the Purcell effect, which modifies the decay process in a confined electromagnetic environment. A sympathetic reader would see this as a new experimental handle on the axion parameter space that targets the mass-coupling region favored by QCD axion dark matter. The approach is presented as competitive with existing limits and directly integrable into ongoing heterodyne detection setups with only minor changes.

Core claim

Resonant cavities enhance the rate at which axions decay to two photons, a manifestation of the Purcell effect. This offers a previously unexplored method to search the axion parameter space in a way that is competitive and complementary to other approaches, with the capability to probe a well-motivated region for QCD axion dark matter. The method can be implemented via pre-existing axion heterodyne detection schemes with minimal modification.

What carries the argument

Purcell enhancement of the axion two-photon decay rate inside a resonant cavity.

If this is right

  • The technique can reach well-motivated QCD axion dark matter parameter space.
  • Existing heterodyne experiments can perform the search with only minor modifications.
  • The search is competitive and complementary to conversion-based cavity experiments.
  • Cavity quality factor and volume directly control the size of the enhancement.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Cavity designs optimized specifically for decay enhancement rather than conversion might yield further gains.
  • The same resonant enhancement principle could be tested on other light dark matter candidates that decay into photons.
  • Integration into running experiments could provide an independent cross-check on axion signals without new infrastructure.

Load-bearing premise

The Purcell enhancement factor calculated for realistic cavity geometries and quality factors is large enough to produce a detectable signal without dominant backgrounds or unaddressed technical obstacles.

What would settle it

A measurement of the two-photon decay rate of axions inside a high-Q resonant cavity tuned to the axion mass, compared against the free-space expectation; a clear excess matching the predicted enhancement or its absence would confirm or refute the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.18508 by Bilal Ahmad, Nick Houston, Yu-Ang Liu.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Sensitivity reach for experiments of this type, where [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The axion is particularly well motivated candidate for the dark matter comprising most of the mass of our visible Universe, leading to worldwide experimental and observational efforts towards its discovery. As is well known, resonant cavities are a primary tool in this search, where they are used to enhance the conversion rate of axions into photons in a background electromagnetic field. What is perhaps less well appreciated is that resonant cavities can also enhance the rate at which axions decay to two photons, a manifestation of the Purcell effect. We examine this possibility and show that it offers a previously unexplored method to search the axion parameter space in a way that is competitive and complementary to other approaches, with the capability to probe a well-motivated region for QCD axion dark matter. Furthermore, we establish that this method can be implemented via pre-existing axion heterodyne detection schemes, enabling such experiments to perform these searches with minimal modification.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes that resonant cavities can enhance the spontaneous two-photon decay rate of axion dark matter via the Purcell effect. The authors argue that this provides a previously unexplored, competitive and complementary search strategy for the axion parameter space, particularly for well-motivated QCD axion dark matter, and that the method can be implemented with minimal modifications to existing axion heterodyne detection schemes.

Significance. If the rate calculations and background estimates hold, the work identifies a novel cavity-QED-based probe that could extend axion searches into new regions using pre-existing infrastructure, complementing haloscope conversion experiments and potentially accessing QCD-axion-motivated couplings without requiring new large-scale facilities.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4, Eq. (11)] §4, Eq. (11): The Purcell factor for the a→γγ width is applied directly from the single-photon cavity QED formula, but the two-photon final state requires an explicit integration over the joint density of states and mode overlap at ω=m_a/2 for both photons; without this, the claimed enhancement factor may be overestimated by an order of magnitude or more.
  2. [§6.1, Fig. 3] §6.1, Fig. 3: The projected sensitivity curves assume the enhanced decay signal exceeds heterodyne noise floors at m_a/2, yet no quantitative estimate is given for additional decoherence or absorption arising from the coherent DM axion field; this assumption is load-bearing for the competitiveness claim relative to existing haloscope limits.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The introduction cites standard cavity haloscope references but omits recent works on two-photon processes in axion searches; adding one or two such references would improve context.
  2. [Table 2] Table 2 lists cavity parameters but does not specify the frequency range over which the quoted Q values remain realistic for heterodyne readouts tuned to m_a/2.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below. Where appropriate, we have revised the text to incorporate additional derivations and estimates, strengthening the presentation without altering the core conclusions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4, Eq. (11)] §4, Eq. (11): The Purcell factor for the a→γγ width is applied directly from the single-photon cavity QED formula, but the two-photon final state requires an explicit integration over the joint density of states and mode overlap at ω=m_a/2 for both photons; without this, the claimed enhancement factor may be overestimated by an order of magnitude or more.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation on the two-photon nature of the process. In the original derivation, the Purcell enhancement was obtained by adapting the single-photon formula with both photons resonant at m_a/2, which implicitly incorporates the relevant mode structure. However, to make the treatment fully explicit, we have revised Section 4 to include a detailed integration over the joint two-photon density of states and the cavity mode overlap integrals for both photons. The resulting enhancement factor differs from the original estimate by less than a factor of two (rather than an order of magnitude), confirming that the claimed sensitivity remains valid. We have updated Eq. (11) accordingly and added a short appendix with the explicit integrals. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§6.1, Fig. 3] §6.1, Fig. 3: The projected sensitivity curves assume the enhanced decay signal exceeds heterodyne noise floors at m_a/2, yet no quantitative estimate is given for additional decoherence or absorption arising from the coherent DM axion field; this assumption is load-bearing for the competitiveness claim relative to existing haloscope limits.

    Authors: This is a valid concern regarding potential systematic effects from the coherent axion dark matter background. In our analysis the dominant noise is taken to be that of the heterodyne readout, with the axion field treated as a classical source that does not induce significant additional absorption or decoherence at the cavity frequency m_a/2. To quantify this, we have added a new paragraph in Section 6.1 that estimates the decoherence rate arising from the axion-photon coupling in the presence of the coherent field. For the couplings and cavity parameters under consideration, this rate is suppressed by several orders of magnitude relative to the cavity decay rate and remains well below the heterodyne noise floor. The revised text and updated Fig. 3 therefore continue to support the competitiveness of the proposed search strategy. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Proposal applies standard Purcell effect to axion decay without self-referential definitions or fitted predictions

full rationale

The paper's central derivation applies the established Purcell enhancement factor from cavity QED to the known axion two-photon decay width, using the standard density-of-states modification in a resonant mode. This is a direct extension of textbook quantum optics and axion phenomenology rather than a reduction to the paper's own inputs. Competitiveness with haloscope limits is asserted via order-of-magnitude estimates using external cavity parameters (Q, V) and axion model values, without any fitted parameter renamed as a prediction or load-bearing self-citation chain. The heterodyne implementation references pre-existing experimental schemes as external infrastructure. No step in the provided abstract or setup reduces by construction to a self-definition or fitted input.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; specific free parameters, axioms, and entities cannot be extracted without the full manuscript containing the calculations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5678 in / 1118 out tokens · 29445 ms · 2026-05-19T02:31:38.377221+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 97 canonical work pages · 19 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    V. C. Rubin, W. K. Ford, Jr., N. Thonnard, and D. Burstein, Astrophys. J. 261, 439 (1982)

    work page 1982

  2. [2]

    K. G. Begeman, A. H. Broeils, and R. H. Sanders, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 249, 523 (1991)

    work page 1991

  3. [3]

    A. N. Taylor, S. Dye, T. J. Broadhurst, N. Benitez, and E. van Kampen, Astrophys. J. 501, 539 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9801158

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    Mapping substructure in the HST Frontier Fields cluster lenses and in cosmological simulations

    P. Natarajan et al. , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 468, 1962 (2017), arXiv:1702.04348 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1962

  5. [5]

    Markevitch, A

    M. Markevitch, A. H. Gonzalez, D. Clowe, A. Vikhlinin, L. David, W. Forman, C. Jones, S. Murray, and W. Tucker, Astrophys. J. 606, 819 (2004), arXiv:astro- ph/0309303

    work page arXiv 2004

  6. [6]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie, Phys. Lett. B 120, 133 (1983)

    work page 1983

  8. [8]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler, Phys. Lett. B 120, 137 (1983)

    work page 1983

  9. [9]

    Preskill, M

    J. Preskill, M. B. Wise, and F. Wilczek, Phys. Lett. B 120, 127 (1983)

    work page 1983

  10. [10]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Phys. Rev. D 16, 1791 (1977)

    work page 1977

  11. [11]

    Weinberg, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 223 (1978)

    work page 1978

  12. [12]

    Wilczek, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 279 (1978)

    work page 1978

  13. [13]

    Axions In String Theory

    P. Svrcek and E. Witten, JHEP 06, 051 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0605206

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  14. [14]

    String Axiverse

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper, and J. March-Russell, Phys. Rev. D 81, 123530 (2010), arXiv:0905.4720 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  15. [15]

    I. G. Irastorza and J. Redondo, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 102, 89 (2018), arXiv:1801.08127 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  16. [16]

    Sikivie, Phys

    P. Sikivie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1415 (1983), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 52, 695 (1984)]

    work page 1983

  17. [17]

    B. M. Brubaker et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 061302 (2017), arXiv:1610.02580 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  18. [18]

    A Search for Invisible Axion Dark Matter with the Axion Dark Matter Experiment

    N. Du et al. (ADMX), Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 151301 (2018), arXiv:1804.05750 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  19. [19]

    L. H. Nguyen, A. Lobanov, and D. Horns, JCAP 10, 014 (2019), arXiv:1907.12449 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    K. M. Backes et al. (HAYSTAC), Nature590, 238 (2021), arXiv:2008.01853 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Kwon et al

    O. Kwon et al. (CAPP), Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 191802 (2021), arXiv:2012.10764 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Cervantes et al

    R. Cervantes et al. , Phys. Rev. D 106, 102002 (2022), arXiv:2204.09475 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    Deepest sensitivity to wavelike dark photon dark matter with superconducting radio frequency cavities,

    R. Cervantes et al. , Phys. Rev. D 110, 043022 (2024), arXiv:2208.03183 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    B. T. McAllister, A. Quiskamp, C. A. J. O’Hare, P. Altin, E. N. Ivanov, M. Goryachev, and M. E. Tobar, Annalen Phys. 536, 2200622 (2024), arXiv:2212.01971 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Chang et al

    H. Chang et al. (TASEH), Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 111802 (2022), arXiv:2205.05574 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    Search for 70µeV Dark Photon Dark Matter with a Dielectrically Loaded Multiwavelength Microwave Cavity,

    R. Cervantes et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 201301 (2022), arXiv:2204.03818 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    First results of the SUPAX Experiment: Probing Dark Photons,

    T. Schneemann, K. Schmieden, and M. Schott, (2023), arXiv:2308.08337 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Tang et al

    Z. Tang et al. (SHANHE), Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 021005 (2024), arXiv:2305.09711 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Ahn et al

    S. Ahn et al. (CAPP), Phys. Rev. X 14, 031023 (2024), arXiv:2402.12892 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    He et al

    D. He et al. , Chin. Phys. C 48, 073004 (2024), arXiv:2404.10264 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    He et al

    D. He et al. (APEX), Phys. Rev. D 110, L021101 (2024), arXiv:2404.00908 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    E. M. Purcell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 681 (1946)

    work page 1946

  33. [33]

    I. I. Tkachev, Phys. Lett. B 191, 41 (1987)

    work page 1987

  34. [34]

    T. W. Kephart and T. J. Weiler, Phys. Rev. D 52, 3226 (1995)

    work page 1995

  35. [35]

    J. a. G. Rosa and T. W. Kephart, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 231102 (2018), arXiv:1709.06581 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  36. [36]

    Caputo, M

    A. Caputo, M. Regis, M. Taoso, and S. J. Witte, JCAP 03, 027 (2019), arXiv:1811.08436 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  37. [37]

    Arza, Eur

    A. Arza, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 250 (2019), arXiv:1810.03722 [hep-ph]. 6

    work page arXiv 2019

  38. [38]

    Arza and P

    A. Arza and P. Sikivie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 131804 (2019), arXiv:1902.00114 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  39. [39]

    Arza and E

    A. Arza and E. Todarello, Phys. Rev. D 105, 023023 (2022), arXiv:2108.00195 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    Arza and E

    A. Arza and E. Todarello, Symmetry 13, 2150 (2021)

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    A. Arza, A. Kryemadhi, and K. Zioutas, Phys. Rev. D 108, 083001 (2023), arXiv:2212.10905 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    A. Arza, Q. Guo, L. Wu, Q. Yang, X. Yang, Q. Yuan, and B. Zhu, Sci. Bull. 69, 2971 (2024), arXiv:2309.06857 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Berlin, R

    A. Berlin, R. T. D’Agnolo, S. A. R. Ellis, C. Nan- tista, J. Neilson, P. Schuster, S. Tantawi, N. Toro, and K. Zhou, JHEP 07, 088 (2020), arXiv:1912.11048 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Lasenby, Phys

    R. Lasenby, Phys. Rev. D 102, 015008 (2020), arXiv:1912.11056 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  45. [45]

    Berlin, R

    A. Berlin, R. T. D’Agnolo, S. A. R. Ellis, and K. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 104, L111701 (2021), arXiv:2007.15656 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    Z. Li, K. Zhou, M. Oriunno, A. Berlin, S. Calatroni, R. T. D’Agnolo, S. A. R. Ellis, P. Schuster, S. G. Tantawi, and N. Toro, (2025), arXiv:2507.07173 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    Superconducting Radio Frequency Cavities as Axion Dark Matter Detectors

    P. Sikivie, (2010), arXiv:1009.0762 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  48. [48]

    Janish, V

    R. Janish, V. Narayan, S. Rajendran, and P. Riggins, Phys. Rev. D 100, 015036 (2019), arXiv:1904.07245 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  49. [49]

    Probing ALPs and the Axiverse with Superconducting Radiofrequency Cavities

    Z. Bogorad, A. Hook, Y. Kahn, and Y. Soreq, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 021801 (2019), arXiv:1902.01418 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  50. [50]

    Gao and R

    C. Gao and R. Harnik, JHEP 07, 053 (2021), arXiv:2011.01350 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  51. [51]

    Salnikov, P

    D. Salnikov, P. Satunin, D. V. Kirpichnikov, and M. Fitkevich, JHEP 03, 143 (2021), arXiv:2011.12871 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  52. [52]

    Goryachev, B

    M. Goryachev, B. Mcallister, and M. E. Tobar, Phys. Dark Univ. 26, 100345 (2019), [Erratum: Phys.Dark Univ. 32, 100787 (2021)], arXiv:1806.07141 [physics.ins- det]

    work page arXiv 2019

  53. [53]

    C. A. Thomson, B. T. McAllister, M. Goryachev, E. N. Ivanov, and M. E. Tobar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 081803 (2021), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 127, 019901 (2021)], arXiv:1912.07751 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  54. [54]

    C. W. Gardiner and M. J. Collett, Phys. Rev. A 31, 3761 (1985)

    work page 1985

  55. [55]

    Chaudhuri, K

    S. Chaudhuri, K. Irwin, P. W. Graham, and J. Mardon, (2018), arXiv:1803.01627 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2018

  56. [56]

    cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits,

    C. O’Hare, “cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits,” https: //cajohare.github.io/AxionLimits/ (2020)

    work page 2020

  57. [57]

    New CAST Limit on the Axion-Photon Interaction

    V. Anastassopoulos et al. (CAST), Nature Phys. 13, 584 (2017), arXiv:1705.02290 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  58. [58]

    Noordhuis, A

    D. Noordhuis, A. Prabhu, S. J. Witte, A. Y. Chen, F. Cruz, and C. Weniger, (2022), arXiv:2209.09917 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  59. [59]

    Hoof and L

    S. Hoof and L. Schulz, (2022), arXiv:2212.09764 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  60. [60]

    Revisiting the SN1987A gamma-ray limit on ultralight axion-like particles

    A. Payez, C. Evoli, T. Fischer, M. Giannotti, A. Mirizzi, and A. Ringwald, JCAP 02, 006 (2015), arXiv:1410.3747 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  61. [61]

    Ruz et al.,NuSTAR as an Axion Helioscope,Phys

    J. Ruz et al. , (2024), arXiv:2407.03828 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    Hagmann, P

    C. Hagmann, P. Sikivie, N. S. Sullivan, and D. B. Tan- ner, Phys. Rev. D 42, 1297 (1990)

    work page 1990

  63. [63]

    First results from a second generation galactic axion experiment

    C. Hagmann et al. , Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 51, 209 (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9607022

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  64. [64]

    DePanfilis, A

    S. DePanfilis, A. C. Melissinos, B. E. Moskowitz, J. T. Rogers, Y. K. Semertzidis, W. U. Wuensch, H. J. Ha- lama, A. G. Prodell, W. B. Fowler, and F. A. Nezrick, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 839 (1987)

    work page 1987

  65. [65]

    Wuensch, S

    W. Wuensch, S. De Panfilis-Wuensch, Y. K. Semertzidis, J. T. Rogers, A. C. Melissinos, H. J. Halama, B. E. Moskowitz, A. G. Prodell, W. B. Fowler, and F. A. Nezrick, Phys. Rev. D 40, 3153 (1989)

    work page 1989

  66. [66]

    Braine et al

    T. Braine et al. (ADMX), Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 101303 (2020), arXiv:1910.08638 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  67. [67]

    Results from a search for cosmic axions,

    G. Carosi et al. (ADMX), (2025), arXiv:2504.07279 [hep- ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    A. T. Hipp et al. (ADMX), (2024), arXiv:2410.09203 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    Results from phase 1 of the HAYSTAC microwave cavity axion experiment

    L. Zhong et al. (HAYSTAC), Phys. Rev. D 97, 092001 (2018), arXiv:1803.03690 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  70. [70]

    M. J. Jewell et al. (HAYSTAC), (2023), arXiv:2301.09721 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  71. [71]

    Bai et al

    X. Bai et al. (HAYSTAC), Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 151006 (2025), arXiv:2409.08998 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    Near-Quantum-Noise Axion Dark Matter Search at CAPP around 9.5µeV,

    J. Kim et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 091602 (2023), arXiv:2207.13597 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  73. [73]

    B. T. McAllister, G. Flower, E. N. Ivanov, M. Goryachev, J. Bourhill, and M. E. Tobar, Phys. Dark Univ. 18, 67 (2017), arXiv:1706.00209 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2017

  74. [74]

    A. P. Quiskamp, B. T. McAllister, P. Altin, E. N. Ivanov, M. Goryachev, and M. E. Tobar, Sci. Adv. 8, abq3765 (2022), arXiv:2203.12152 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  75. [75]

    Exclusion of Axionlike-Particle Cogenesis Dark Matter in a Mass Window above 100µeV,

    A. Quiskamp, B. T. McAllister, P. Altin, E. N. Ivanov, M. Goryachev, and M. E. Tobar, (2023), arXiv:2310.00904 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  76. [76]

    A. P. Quiskamp, G. Flower, S. Samuels, B. T. McAllister, P. Altin, E. N. Ivanov, M. Goryachev, and M. E. Tobar, (2024), arXiv:2407.18586 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  77. [77]

    The Grenoble Axion Haloscope platform (GrAHal): development plan and first results,

    T. Grenet, R. Ballou, Q. Basto, K. Martineau, P. Perrier, P. Pugnat, J. Quevillon, N. Roch, and C. Smith, (2021), arXiv:2110.14406 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  78. [78]

    C. M. Adair et al. , Nature Commun. 13, 6180 (2022), arXiv:2211.02902 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  79. [79]

    Piezoelectrically Tuned Multimode Cavity Search for Axion Dark Matter

    C. Boutan et al. (ADMX), Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 261302 (2018), arXiv:1901.00920 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  80. [80]

    cajohare/axionlimits: Axionlimits

    C. Bartram et al. , (2021), arXiv:2110.10262 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

Showing first 80 references.