Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 6 minor 215 references

A Comprehensive Review of AI-based Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Applications and Challenges

T0 review · 5 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read AI-based tutoring systems can match human tutors in structured subjects, yet the evidence for their effectiveness is not rigorous enough to justify confident adoption.

desk verdict An ambitious but uneven ITS review: credible qualitative conclusions, unverifiable evidence base, needs major revision before it can serve as a systematic reference. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.18882 v1 pith:H7QQZX5W submitted 2025-07-25 cs.IR cs.AIcs.HC

Meriem Zerkouk , Miloud Mihoubi , Belkacem Chikhaoui This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.IRcs.AIcs.HC
keywords intelligenttutoringsystemsAIineducationadaptivelearningpersonalizedsystematicliteraturerevieweducationaleffectivenessstudentmodelingnaturallanguageprocessing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review tries to establish two things at once: that AI-based intelligent tutoring systems (ITS) — computer programs that mimic a human tutor by personalizing instruction and feedback — can deliver scalable, adaptive instruction that in structured domains approaches human tutoring, and that the evidence base supporting such claims is methodologically fragile. It arrives at this by systematically reviewing 127 studies published from 2010 to 2025 across eight research questions covering features, pedagogy, machine learning and natural language processing, student modeling, evaluation, domain applications, and emerging technologies. A sympathetic reading of the paper's central assertion is that ITS effectiveness is real but context-dependent, and that the field's biggest obstacle is not the technology but the lack of rigorous, longitudinal, adequately powered experiments with demographic disaggregation. If the paper is right, the practical consequence is that no adoption decision about an ITS should be made on the strength of a short pilot or a percentage-gain headline.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the systematic literature review protocol: a three-stage process of planning, conducting, and reporting, guided by a structured reporting guideline and a study-selection flow diagram. The review organizes its 127 selected studies into eight research questions and classifies them into KPI tables that separate system features, pedagogical strategies, ML/NLP integration, student modeling and assessment, evaluation outcomes, domain-specific applications, and emerging technologies like AR/VR, IoT, generative AI, and blockchain. The eight research questions and KPI tables do the argumentative work: they let the review claim both that the field is advanced and that its evaluation is inconsistent.

What would settle it

Inspect the studies in Tables 3-9 and count how many report a validation period of six weeks or more, a sample of 100 or more in real learning settings, and peer review; if most entries are development-oriented pilots or prototypes, the stated evidence base collapses and the effectiveness conclusions would have to be weakened. The paper's own observation that most pedagogical-scaffold studies run under six weeks with fewer than 100 learners is already a partial falsifier.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that AI-based ITS are poised to transform education by offering scalable, adaptive, and personalized instruction that surpasses traditional tutoring in key capabilities, while their measured effectiveness remains mixed because evaluation practice lags behind system development. Across the reviewed studies, learning gains of roughly 25 to 50 percent are reported in mathematics, spatial reasoning, science, and language learning, and ITS are described as achieving outcomes comparable to human tutoring in structured domains. Yet the same review finds persistent methodological weaknesses: most pedagogical-scaffold studies run under six weeks with fewer than 100 learners, self-reported engagement and satisfaction metrics dominate, demographic disaggregation is largely absent, and reproducibility is hindered by proprietary data and inconsistent metric reporting. The conclusion the author wants the reader to accept is that greater scientific rigor in experimental design and data analysis is the precondition for realizing ITS potential.

Load-bearing premise

The review's conclusions rest on the assumption that the 127 studies it selected really satisfy its own criteria — real classrooms, at least six weeks of use, at least 100 participants, peer review — so the evidence base is valid.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Effectiveness claims for an ITS should be treated as provisional until confirmed by longitudinal, adequately powered studies that report demographic breakdowns.
  • Adoption decisions should rely on standardized evaluation indicators, including usability and satisfaction measures, rather than isolated percentage gains.
  • The strongest evidence supports ITS use in structured domains like mathematics, science, and language learning; extrapolating to open-ended humanities subjects is not warranted by the reviewed studies.
  • New capabilities from large language models, virtual reality, the Internet of Things, and blockchain should not be assumed to improve learning until they pass the same evaluation standards applied to earlier ITS.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the inclusion criteria were applied strictly, the effective evidence base would likely shrink below 127, which would narrow the scope of the qualitative conclusions the review can support.
  • A concrete next step the paper implies but does not propose: a shared public registry of ITS evaluations reporting sample size, duration, effect size, and demographic disaggregation would let the field separate durable gains from context effects.
  • The review's critique suggests a testable benchmark: re-analyzing existing ITS datasets with and without demographic disaggregation to see whether average gains hide unequal benefits across gender, socioeconomic status, or prior knowledge.
  • For LLM-based tutors, the paper's own logic implies that feedback quality is not enough; these systems should be evaluated on learning outcomes and self-regulated learning, not just conversational fluency.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper is a systematic literature review, framed with PRISMA and Kitchenham-style methodology, of AI-based intelligent tutoring systems (ITS) published from 2010 to 2025. It formulates eight research questions covering distinguishing features of AI-based ITS, pedagogical strategies, ML/NLP integration, student modeling and assessment, evaluation methods, domain-specific applications, emerging technologies, and industrial ITS. The authors report screening 37,617 records down to 127 included studies and organize their findings around the eight RQs, concluding that AI-based ITS show promise for scalable personalized instruction but that the effectiveness evidence base is mixed and that experimental design and data analysis need greater rigor.

Significance. If the evidence base and synthesis were sound, the paper would be a useful resource for researchers and practitioners: it covers a broad range of ITS topics, explicitly states research questions, makes a serious attempt at PRISMA-style reporting, and reaches a qualitative conclusion that is consistent with prior meta-analyses by Kulik and Fletcher, Steenbergen-Hu and Cooper, and VanLehn. The paper also deserves credit for acknowledging, at several points, the predominance of short-term, small-scale studies and the lack of demographic disaggregation. The principal significance risk is that the systematic claim rests on an inclusion process that is not demonstrably applied and on evidence tables that contain mismatched references and unverifiable quantitative results. The manuscript does not provide machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or an enumerated study list, so its contribution is entirely dependent on the care and correctness of its literature synthesis.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.1 / Table 2 and RQ2 discussion] The review claims that 127 studies were included after applying inclusion criteria requiring real learning settings, validation duration of at least 6 weeks, sample size of at least 100, and peer-reviewed status. The manuscript itself states in the RQ2 discussion that 'the great majority of studies on pedagogical scaffolds are <6-week, single-site pilots involving fewer than 100 learners,' which directly contradicts the application of those criteria to the reviewed literature. Either the criteria were not applied to substantial parts of the synthesized evidence, or the 'great majority' statement is inaccurate; in either case the claim that the 127 studies form a qualifying evidence base is not supportable as written and must be reconciled.
  2. [Section 3.1 and Figure 2] The PRISMA flow diagram does not report a full-text eligibility screening stage with the number of records excluded at that stage, and the 127 included studies are not enumerated anywhere or mapped onto Tables 3-9. Without a study-level list and complete stage counts, the systematic nature and reproducibility of the selection process cannot be verified. The paper should list all included studies in an appendix or supplementary file, report the number screened at full-text level, and explain how the 127 count relates to the '26 reports from specialized web sources' mentioned in Section 3, especially because Table 2 restricts inclusion to peer-reviewed papers.
  3. [Section RQ6 and Table 8] The quantitative effect claims in RQ6 - 25% improvement from reference [67], 30% from [68], 40% and 20% from [11], 35% from [43], and 50% from [216] - are presented without extraction tables, confidence intervals, or demonstration that these studies satisfy the 6-week minimum duration and 100-participant threshold. Reference [11] (Chan et al.) is a systematic literature review, not an empirical study with data, so it cannot satisfy the inclusion criteria. Furthermore, Table 8 attributes the 'AI-guided virtual chemistry lab' row and the '40% reduction in lab accidents, 20% improvement in understanding' finding to reference [7], but reference [7] is ChatPLT for physics; the same numbers are attributed to [11] in the text. These errors make the domain-specific quantitative claims uninterpretable as stated and require re-extraction and correction.
  4. [Section RQ8] The industrial ITS section reports concrete quantitative effects (e.g., a 25% reduction in training time for Sherlock, a 30% improvement in safety practices for ChemLab VR), but these systems are not listed in any evidence table with study characteristics, and several cited sources do not correspond to the described systems: reference [38] is listed as 'Meta Technologies' rather than as a ChemLab VR study, and reference [33] is a product webpage for PowerSimulator. The statement that 'the evaluation of AI-based Industrial ITS ... is presented in Table 9' is misleading because Table 9 contains emerging trends and future technologies, not industrial systems. RQ8 therefore needs its own evidence table or the quantitative claims should be removed.
  5. [Section 5.1, RQ1 answer] The conclusion that AI-based ITS 'are poised to transform education by offering scalable, adaptive, and personalized instruction that surpasses the capabilities of traditional tutoring' is stronger than the evidence assembled in the paper. Elsewhere, the paper reports only that ITS achieve learning gains 'comparable to human tutors' (Section RQ5) and repeatedly notes the predominance of short, small-scale pilots. The RQ1 summary should be brought in line with the mixed-evidence conclusion stated in the abstract, and the review should avoid the claim of superiority over human tutoring unless a direct comparative synthesis is provided.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 1] There are typographical errors, including 'Intelliigent' in the first paragraph and 'is both is both' in the RQ4 section; these should be corrected.
  2. [Section 3.1 and Table 1] Table 1 lists search terms in four columns but gives no Boolean syntax, database-specific query strings, or date-range justification; reproducible search strings should be reported.
  3. [Section 3.1] The methodology describes the study as 'this scoping review [153]' while elsewhere presenting it as a systematic literature review; the terminology and cited guidance should be aligned.
  4. [References] The reference list contains duplicates and incomplete entries, including [48] duplicating [4], [108] duplicating [3], [179] and [181] duplicating the same Govea et al. paper, and [22] ending in a truncated fragment; the list should be cleaned and deduplicated.
  5. [Tables 6 and 7] The evidence tables use heavily abbreviated column headers and mostly binary X entries; since these are presented as evaluation tables, each row should include at least the sample size, study duration, and primary outcome measure to support the synthesis.
  6. [Section 5.2] The sentence beginning 'T6he most effective educational systems' contains a typographical insertion and should read 'The most effective educational systems.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a literature synthesis with no fitted predictions, derivation chains, or load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

This paper is a systematic literature review, not a predictive or formal derivation. Its central claims—that AI-based ITS show a mixed effectiveness landscape and that evaluation practices need greater scientific rigor—are aggregative conclusions drawn from the cited literature, not quantities fitted to data. No equation or parameter in the paper is defined in terms of its own output, and no "prediction" is constructed from a fitted input. The only self-citation is [44], the authors' own dropout-prediction model, cited once in RQ5 when listing dropout rates as an evaluation KPI; this citation is incidental and does not support the review's central findings. The internal contradiction between the stated inclusion criteria (validation of at least 6 weeks and sample size of at least 100) and the text's admission that "the great majority of studies on pedagogical scaffolds are less than 6-week, single-site pilots involving fewer than 100 learners" is a selection-bias and reporting-validity concern, not a circularity: the conclusion does not reduce to the inclusion criteria by definition. Likewise, the unverifiable percentage gains quoted in RQ6 are extraction-quality concerns, not circularity. Under the specified rubric, no load-bearing step reduces to its own input, and no self-citation chain forces the paper's conclusions.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This review has no model or empirical data, so it introduces no free parameters and no invented entities. The entry points that determine its conclusions are the selection criteria, the representativeness of the selected studies, and the fidelity of the extracted numbers; these are listed as domain assumptions because they are not verified within the paper.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The 127 selected studies are representative of the population of ITS evaluations published from 2010 to 2025.
    The review's conclusions are inductive generalizations from the selected set, but no list of included studies or full screening counts is provided, so representativeness is assumed.
  • domain assumption The reported effect sizes and percentages in Tables 3-9 are faithful to the source studies.
    The review provides no effect-size extraction tables, confidence intervals, or source-level verification; several table cells are truncated or mismatched, casting doubt on fidelity.
  • domain assumption The inclusion and exclusion criteria in Table 2 were applied consistently during screening.
    Many studies cited in the results sections appear to be small pilots, prototypes, or technical evaluations that would fail the stated criteria of at least 6 weeks and 100 participants in a real learning environment.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Comprehensive Review of AI-based Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Applications and Challenges." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/H7QQZX5W

@misc{pith2026250718882,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Comprehensive Review of AI-based Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Applications and Challenges},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/H7QQZX5W}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.18882}
}
read the original abstract

AI-based Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) have significant potential to transform teaching and learning. As efforts continue to design, develop, and integrate ITS into educational contexts, mixed results about their effectiveness have emerged. This paper provides a comprehensive review to understand how ITS operate in real educational settings and to identify the associated challenges in their application and evaluation. We use a systematic literature review method to analyze numerous qualified studies published from 2010 to 2025, examining domains such as pedagogical strategies, NLP, adaptive learning, student modeling, and domain-specific applications of ITS. The results reveal a complex landscape regarding the effectiveness of ITS, highlighting both advancements and persistent challenges. The study also identifies a need for greater scientific rigor in experimental design and data analysis. Based on these findings, suggestions for future research and practical implications are proposed.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

215 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

  1. [11]

    In: Computers and Education Open (2021)

    Chan, P., Van Gerven, T., Dubois, J.-L., Bernaerts, K.: Virtual chemical labo- ratories: a systematic literature review of research, technologies and instructional design. In: Computers and Education Open (2021)

    2021

  2. [44]

    In: Education and Information Technologies (2024)

    Zerkouk, M., Mihoubi, M., Chikhaoui, B., Wang, S.: A machine learning based model for student’s dropout prediction in online training. In: Education and Information Technologies (2024)

    2024

  3. [67]

    In: Education and Information Technologies, pp

    Shih, S.-C., Chang, C.-C., Kuo, B.-C., Huang, Y.-H.: Mathematics intelligent tutoring system for learning multiplication and division of fractions based on diagnostic teaching. In: Education and Information Technologies, pp. 1–22 (2023)

    2023

  4. [68]

    L., Ib´ a˜ nez, M

    Uriarte-Portillo, A., Zatar´ ain-Cabada, R., Barr´ on Estrada, M. L., Ib´ a˜ nez, M. B., Gonz´ alez-Barr´ on, L.-M.: Intelligent Augmented Reality for Learning Geometry. In: Information, vol. 14, 245 (2023)

    2023

  5. [43]

    E., Stoffova, V.: SOLVE MATH PROBLEMS STEP BY STEP WITH AI SUPPORT

    Horv´ athn´ e Hadob´ as, O. E., Stoffova, V.: SOLVE MATH PROBLEMS STEP BY STEP WITH AI SUPPORT. In: INTED Proceedings (2024). 45

    2024

  6. [216]

    D.: Educa- tion Theories and AI Affordances: Design and Implementation of an Intelligent Computer Assisted Language Learning System

    Chen, X., Bear, E., Hui, B., Santhi Ponnusamy, H., Meurers, W. D.: Educa- tion Theories and AI Affordances: Design and Implementation of an Intelligent Computer Assisted Language Learning System. In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (2022). 60

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    In: 10th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’24) (2024)

    Garcia-Bosque, M., Naya-Forcano, A., Cascarosa, E., Aznar, F., S´ anchez-Azqueta, C., Celma, S., Aldea, C.: ChatPLT: An intelligent tutoring system for teach- ing Physics in Higher Education. In: 10th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’24) (2024)

    2024

  8. [38]

    Meta Technologies. (2024). https://www.meta.com/ Accessed: 24 Sept. 2024

    2024

  9. [33]

    IncSys: PowerSimulator: Power Grid Simulation Software. (2024). https://www. incsys.com/powersimulator/ Accessed: 24 Sept. 2024

    2024

Show all 215 references
  1. [1]

    In: 2021 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp

    Dudyrev, F., Maksimenkova, O., Mikhailenko, D.: Intelligent Virtual Reality Tutoring Systems as a New Generation of Simulators: Requirements and Opportu- nities. In: 2021 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 706–718 (2021)

    2021

  2. [2]

    Ali, S., Abuhmed, T., El-Sappagh, S., Muhammad, K., Alonso-Moral, J. M., Con- falonieri, R., Guidotti, R., Del Ser, J., D´ ıaz-Rodr´ ıguez, N., Herrera, F.: Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): What we know and what is left to attain Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence. ...

    2023

  3. [3]

    R., Hadley, W

    Koedinger, K., Anderson, J. R., Hadley, W. H., Mark, M. A.: Intelligent Tutoring Goes to School in the Big City. Online (1997). https://api.semanticscholar.org/ CorpusID:56309126

    1997

  4. [4]

    In: Farmanbar, M., Tzamtzi, M., Verma, A

    Karpouzis, K.: Explainable AI for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In: Farmanbar, M., Tzamtzi, M., Verma, A. K., Chakravorty, A. (eds.) Frontiers of Artificial Intel- ligence, Ethics, and Multidisciplinary Applications, pp. 59–70. Springer Nature, Singapore (2024)

    2024

  5. [5]

    In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (2022)

    Smalenberger, M., Smalenberger, K.: Toward Accessible Intelligent Tutoring Sys- tems: Integrating Cognitive Tutors and Conversational Agents. In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (2022)

    2022

  6. [6]

    Ramadhan, M., Warnars, H. L. H. S., Razak, F. H. A.: Combining Intelligent Tutor- ing Systems and Gamification: A Systematic Literature Review. In: Education and Information Technologies, vol. 29, pp. 6753–6789 (2023)

    2023

  7. [8]

    In: Information (2025)

    C´ ordova-Esparza, D.-M.: AI-Powered Educational Agents: Opportunities, Innova- tions, and Ethical Challenges. In: Information (2025)

    2025

  8. [9]

    In: AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2025)

    Gao, W., Liu, Q., Yue, L., Yao, F., Lv, R., Zhang, Z., Wang, H., Huang, Z.: Agent4Edu: Generating Learner Response Data by Generative Agents for Intelligent Education Systems. In: AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2025)

    2025

  9. [10]

    J., Zhang, Q., Xie, X., Xiong, H.: LLM-powered Multi-agent Framework for Goal-oriented Learning in Intelligent Tutoring System

    Wang, T., Zhan, Y., Lian, J., Hu, Z., Yuan, N. J., Zhang, Q., Xie, X., Xiong, H.: LLM-powered Multi-agent Framework for Goal-oriented Learning in Intelligent Tutoring System. In: Companion Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2025 (2025)

    2025

  10. [12]

    Andes Technology: User Training Downloads and Support. (2024). Accessed: 2024-10-03

    2024

  11. [13]

    SQL Tutor: SQL Tutor Website. (2024). https://sqltutor.de/ Accessed: 2024-10- 03

    2024

  12. [14]

    Carnegie Learning: The Cognitive Tutor: Applying Cognitive Science to Education. (2024). https://www.carnegielearning.com/pages/whitepaper-report/ 43 the-cognitive-tutor-applying-cognitive-science-to-education/ Accessed: 2024-10- 03

    2024

  13. [15]

    Sim Trainer: Sim Trainer Website. (2024). https://sim-trainer.com/ Accessed: 2024-10-03

    2024

  14. [16]

    C., Chipman, P., Haynes, B

    Graesser, A. C., Chipman, P., Haynes, B. C., Olney, A. M.: AutoTutor: an intel- ligent tutoring system with mixed-initiative dialogue. In: IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 48, pp. 612–618 (2005)

    2005

  15. [17]

    (Year n/a)

    Balaso, P., Pawar, L.: AI-Enhanced Education: Personalized Learning and Educational Technology. (Year n/a)

  16. [18]

    Electronic Arts: The Sims Academy. (2024). https://www.thesims.com/fr FR/ the-academy Accessed: 2024-10-03

    2024

  17. [19]

    In: Journal of Intellectual Property and Information Technology Law (JIPIT) (2022)

    Achieng’, R., Wakoli, E., Rodrot, M.: Africa’s Ed-Tech Platforms: Protecting Children’s Right to Privacy. In: Journal of Intellectual Property and Information Technology Law (JIPIT) (2022)

    2022

  18. [20]

    Eduaide: AI-driven Workspace for Dynamic Lessons. (2024). https://www. eduaide.ai/ Accessed: 25 Sept. 2024

    2024

  19. [21]

    J.: Knowledge-based tutoring: the GUIDON program

    Clancey, W. J.: Knowledge-based tutoring: the GUIDON program. (1987). https: //api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:61010762

    1987

  20. [22]

    Carnegie Mellon University: RoboTutor. (2024). https://www.cmu.edu/scs/ robotutor/index.html Accessed: 24 Sept. 202 ITS with K

    2024

  21. [23]

    PharmaLearn: PharmaLearn: Learn from the Experts. (2024). https://learn. pharmalex.com/ Accessed: 24 Sept. 2024

    2024

  22. [24]

    VIAPROLEARN: Road Safety and Driving Education Training. (2024). https: //www.viaprolearn.com/ Accessed: 24 Sept. 2024

    2024

  23. [25]

    Prodiags: Automotive Online Training. (2024). https://prodiags.com/ Accessed: 24 Sept. 2024

    2024

  24. [26]

    Course Hero: Become an Online Tutor and Earn Money. (2024). https://www. coursehero.com/become-a-tutor/ Accessed: 24 Sept. 2024

    2024

  25. [27]

    Institute for Information Law (IVIR): Summer Course on European Platform Regulation. (2024). https://www.ivir.nl/courses/epr/ Accessed: 24 Sept. 2024

    2024

  26. [28]

    AutoReturn: AutoReturn Portal. (2024). https://autoreturn.atlassian.net/ Accessed: 24 Sept. 2024. 44

    2024

  27. [29]

    W., Chang, R.-C., Lee, Y

    Evens, M. W., Chang, R.-C., Lee, Y. H., Shim, L., Woo, C.-W., Zhang, Y.: CIRCSIM-Tutor: An Intelligent Tutoring System Using Natural Language Dialogue. In: Applied Natural Language Processing Conference (1997)

    1997

  28. [30]

    Epic: Epic: With the Patient at the Heart. (2024). https://www.epic.com/ Accessed: 24 Sept. 2024

    2024

  29. [31]

    Mariner Skills: Online Maritime Training. (2024). https://marinerskills.com/ Accessed: 24 Sept. 2024

    2024

  30. [32]

    FoodSafe: Food Safety Training and Certification. (2024). https://www.foodsafe. com/ Accessed: 24 Sept. 2024

    2024

  31. [34]

    Gemini: Gemini: Cryptocurrency Exchange. (2024). https://www.gemini.com/ Accessed: 24 Sept. 2024

    2024

  32. [35]

    Simpro International: Nitrogen Generators and Power Systems. (2024). https: //www.simpro.com/ Accessed: 24 Sept. 2024

    2024

  33. [36]

    Dart Communications. (2024). https://www.dart.com/ Accessed: 24 Sept. 2024

    2024

  34. [37]

    Maestro Technologies. (2024). https://maestro.com/ Accessed: 24 Sept. 2024

    2024

  35. [39]

    Aerolearn: Repair Station Training. (2024). https://aerolearn.com/ Accessed: 24 Sept. 2024

    2024

  36. [40]

    In: SAGE Open, vol

    Ersozlu, Z., Ledger, S., Ersozlu, A., Mayne, F., Wildy, H.: Mixed-Reality Learning Environments in Teacher Education: An Analysis of TeachLivE ™ Research. In: SAGE Open, vol. 11 (2021)

    2021

  37. [41]

    C., Benson, M., Raysor, S., Holme, T

    King, E. C., Benson, M., Raysor, S., Holme, T. A., Sewall, J., Koedinger, K., Aleven, V., Yaron, D. J.: The Open-Response Chemistry Cognitive Assis- tance Tutor System: Development and Implementation. In: Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 546–552 (2022)

    2022

  38. [42]

    H.: A study on the NCS based curriculum for educating Technical Director for VFX industry with Artificial Intelligence

    Lee, B., Park, S. H.: A study on the NCS based curriculum for educating Technical Director for VFX industry with Artificial Intelligence. In: Cartoon and Animation Studies (2021)

    2021

  39. [45]

    ArXiv, abs/2406.12433 (2024)

    Gao, J., Chen, B., Zhao, X., Liu, W., Li, X., Wang, Y., Zhang, Z., Wang, W., Ye, Y., Lin, S., Guo, H., Tang, R.: LLM-enhanced Reranking in Recommender Systems. ArXiv, abs/2406.12433 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  40. [46]

    In: International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp

    Al Faraby, S., Adiwijaya, A., Romadhony, A.: Review on Neural Question Gen- eration for Education Purposes. In: International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 1–38 (2023)

    2023

  41. [47]

    F., Lobato, R

    Santi, M., Manacero, A., Peronaglio, F. F., Lobato, R. S., Spolon, R., Cave- naghi, M. A.: Training Transformers for Question Generation Task in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In: 2022 17th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), pp. 1–6 (2022)

    2022

  42. [48]

    In: Farmanbar, M

    Karpouzis, K.: Explainable AI for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In: Farmanbar, M. et al. (eds.) Frontiers of Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, and Multidisciplinary Applications, pp. 59–70. Springer Nature Singapore (2024)

    2024

  43. [49]

    In: Artificial Intelligence, vol

    Conati, C., Barral, O., Putnam, V., Rieger, L.: Toward personalized XAI: A case study in intelligent tutoring systems. In: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 298, 103503 (2019)

    2019

  44. [50]

    P., Chin, D

    Cutumisu, M., Blair, K. P., Chin, D. B., Schwartz, D. L.: Assessing Whether Stu- dents Seek Constructive Criticism: The Design of an Automated Feedback System for a Graphic Design Task. In: International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 27, pp. 419–447 (2017)

    2017

  45. [51]

    ArXiv, abs/2406.10934 (2024)

    Jiang, Z., Jiang, M.: Beyond Answers: Large Language Model-Powered Tutoring System in Physics Education for Deep Learning and Precise Understanding. ArXiv, abs/2406.10934 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  46. [52]

    A., Latham, A., Whitton, N.: On predicting learning styles in con- versational intelligent tutoring systems using fuzzy decision trees

    Crockett, K. A., Latham, A., Whitton, N.: On predicting learning styles in con- versational intelligent tutoring systems using fuzzy decision trees. In: International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 97, pp. 98–115 (2017)

    2017

  47. [53]

    M.: Review of intelligent tutoring systems using bayesian approach

    Santhi, R., Priya, B., Nandhini, J. M.: Review of intelligent tutoring systems using bayesian approach. ArXiv, abs/1302.7081 (2013)

    2013 arXiv

  48. [54]

    In: 2023 IEEE 5th Eurasia Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Healthcare and Sustainability (2023)

    Ingkavara, T., Wongkia, W., Panjaburee, P.: Trends of Adaptive/Personalized Learning and Intelligent Tutoring Systems in Mathematics: A Review of Aca- demic Publications from 2010 to 2022. In: 2023 IEEE 5th Eurasia Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Healthcare and Sustainab...

    2023

  49. [55]

    In: Intelligent Communication Technologies and Virtual Mobile Networks, pp

    Alam, A.: Harnessing the Power of AI to Create Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Enhanced Classroom Experience and Improved Learning Outcomes. In: Intelligent Communication Technologies and Virtual Mobile Networks, pp. 571–591. Springer Nature Singapore (2023)

    2023

  50. [56]

    M., Sewall, J., Koedinger, K.: A New Paradigm for Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Example-Tracing Tutors

    Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., Sewall, J., Koedinger, K.: A New Paradigm for Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Example-Tracing Tutors. In: International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 19, pp. 105–154 (2009)

    2009

  51. [57]

    J., McKenzie, J

    Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M. M., et al.: The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. In: Systematic Reviews, vol. 10 (2020)

    2020

  52. [58]

    Abbas, N., Ali, I., Manzoor, R., Hussain, T., Hussain, M. H. A.: Role of Artifi- cial Intelligence Tools in Enhancing Students’ Educational Performance at Higher Levels. (2023)

    2023

  53. [59]

    In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering (2006)

    Budgen, D., Brereton, P.: Performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering (2006)

    2006

  54. [60]

    In: Education Sciences (2024)

    Fern´ andez-Herrero, J.: Evaluating Recent Advances in Affective Intelligent Tutor- ing Systems: A Scoping Review of Educational Impacts and Future Prospects. In: Education Sciences (2024)

    2024

  55. [61]

    C., Matangula, T

    Weaver, J. C., Matangula, T. C., Matney, G. T.: The power of feedback in teacher education. In: International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies (2024)

    2024

  56. [62]

    R., Abu-Naser, S

    Qwaider, S. R., Abu-Naser, S. S.: Excel Intelligent Tutoring System. In: Proceed- ings (2018)

    2018

  57. [63]

    D., Sommer, M., Zhu, J., Stephen, A., Valle, N., Hampton, J., Li, J.: The impact of gamification in educational settings on stu- dent learning outcomes: a meta-analysis

    Huang, R.-T., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Sommer, M., Zhu, J., Stephen, A., Valle, N., Hampton, J., Li, J.: The impact of gamification in educational settings on stu- dent learning outcomes: a meta-analysis. In: Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 68, pp. 1875–1901 (2020)

    2020

  58. [64]

    Andrade, F. R. H., Mizoguchi, R., Isotani, S.: The Bright and Dark Sides of Gamification. In: International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (2016)

    2016

  59. [65]

    S.: The effect of gamification on motivation and engagement

    Alsawaier, R. S.: The effect of gamification on motivation and engagement. In: Proceedings (2018)

    2018

  60. [66]

    D., Lemos, B., de Brito, P

    Ferreira da Rocha, F. D., Lemos, B., de Brito, P. H., Santos, R., Rodrigues, L., Isotani, S., Dermeval, D.: Gamification and open learner model: An experimental study on the effects on self-regulatory learning characteristics. In: Education and Information Technologies, vol. 2...

    2023

  61. [69]

    C., Hu, X., Nye, B

    Graesser, A. C., Hu, X., Nye, B. D., VanLehn, K., Kumar, R., Heffernan, C., Heffernan, N. T., Woolf, B. P., Olney, A. M., Rus, V., et al.: ElectronixTutor: an intelligent tutoring system with multiple learning resources for electronics. In: International Journal of STEM Educat...

    2018

  62. [70]

    S., Srinivasa, K

    Kurni, M., Mohammed, M. S., Srinivasa, K. G.: Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In: A Beginner’s Guide to Introduce Artificial Intelligence in Teaching and Learning, pp. 29–44. Springer, Cham (2023)

    2023

  63. [71]

    ArXiv, abs/2305.16568 (2023)

    Tang, Y., Hare, R.: Combining Gamification and Intelligent Tutoring Systems in a Serious Game for Engineering Education. ArXiv, abs/2305.16568 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  64. [72]

    M., Afreen, M., Makkubhai, J

    Makkubhai, I. M., Afreen, M., Makkubhai, J. I., B. A. Final, Year Student: Enhancing Educational Pedagogy through Intelligent Systems: Harnessing Arti- ficial Intelligence for Advancing Progressive Teaching Practices. In: Proceedings (2023)

    2023

  65. [73]

    In: Advances in Intelligent Tutoring Systems (2010)

    VanLehn, K., van de Sande, B., Shelby, R., Gershman, S.: The Andes Physics Tutoring System: An Experiment in Freedom. In: Advances in Intelligent Tutoring Systems (2010)

    2010

  66. [74]

    In: Information and Software Technology, vol

    Wang, H.: SQL Tutor+: A co-operative ITS with repository support. In: Information and Software Technology, vol. 39, pp. 343–350 (1997)

    1997

  67. [75]

    R., Matessa, M., Lebiere, C.: ACT-R: A Theory of Higher Level Cognition and Its Relation to Visual Attention

    Anderson, J. R., Matessa, M., Lebiere, C.: ACT-R: A Theory of Higher Level Cognition and Its Relation to Visual Attention. In: Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 12, pp. 439–462 (1997)

    1997

  68. [76]

    In: Applied Sciences (2022)

    Bradaˇ c, V., Smolka, P., Kotyrba, M., Pr˚ udek, T.: Design of an Intelligent Tutoring System to Create a Personalized Study Plan Using Expert Systems. In: Applied Sciences (2022)

    2022

  69. [77]

    In: Proceed- ings (1992)

    Frasson, C.: From Expert Systems to Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In: Proceed- ings (1992)

    1992

  70. [78]

    C., Llamas, M., Laza, R.: Designing Intelligent Tutoring Systems: A Personalization Strategy using Case-Based Reasoning and Multi-Agent Systems

    Gonz´ alez, C., Burguillo, J. C., Llamas, M., Laza, R.: Designing Intelligent Tutoring Systems: A Personalization Strategy using Case-Based Reasoning and Multi-Agent Systems. In: Proceedings (2013). 48

    2013

  71. [79]

    In: Applied Sciences (2024)

    Yan, A., Cheng, Z.: A Review of the Development and Future Challenges of Case-Based Reasoning. In: Applied Sciences (2024)

    2024

  72. [80]

    In: Iberoamerican Congress on Pattern Recognition (2019)

    Perner, P.: Case-Based Reasoning - Methods, Techniques, and Applications. In: Iberoamerican Congress on Pattern Recognition (2019)

    2019

  73. [81]

    L., Sison, R

    Reyes, R. L., Sison, R. C.: Agent Representation and Communication in CBR- Tutor. In: International Conference on Health Information Science (2001)

    2001

  74. [82]

    In: International Conference on Web Engineering (2024)

    Piro, L., Bianchi, T., Alessandrelli, L., Chizzola, A., Casiraghi, D., Sancassani, S., Gatti, N.: MyLearningTalk: An LLM-Based Intelligent Tutoring System. In: International Conference on Web Engineering (2024)

    2024

  75. [83]

    In: Neural Computing and Applications (2023)

    Algherairy, A., Ahmed, M.: A review of dialogue systems: current trends and future directions. In: Neural Computing and Applications (2023)

    2023

  76. [84]

    ArXiv, abs/2407.10246 (2024)

    Feng, T., Liu, S., Ghosal, D.: CourseAssist: Pedagogically Appropriate AI Tutor for Computer Science Education. ArXiv, abs/2407.10246 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  77. [85]

    D.: Usability Evaluation of Intelligent Tutoring System: ITS from a Usability Perspective

    Chughtai, R., Zhang, S., Craig, S. D.: Usability Evaluation of Intelligent Tutoring System: ITS from a Usability Perspective. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 367–371 (2015)

    2015

  78. [86]

    K., Chen, H.-R., Huang, Y.-M., Yeh, W.-T., Li, C.-T.: Usability of an Affective Emotional Learning Tutoring System for Mobile Devices

    Wang, T.-H., Lin, H.-C. K., Chen, H.-R., Huang, Y.-M., Yeh, W.-T., Li, C.-T.: Usability of an Affective Emotional Learning Tutoring System for Mobile Devices. In: Sustainability (2021)

    2021

  79. [87]

    K., Liao, Y.-C., Wang, H.-T.: Eye Movement Analysis and Usability Assessment on Affective Computing Combined with Intelligent Tutoring System

    Lin, H.-C. K., Liao, Y.-C., Wang, H.-T.: Eye Movement Analysis and Usability Assessment on Affective Computing Combined with Intelligent Tutoring System. In: Sustainability (2022)

    2022

  80. [88]

    C., Olney, A

    Graesser, A. C., Olney, A. M., Haynes, B. C., Chipman, P.: AutoTutor: A Cog- nitive System That Simulates a Tutor Through Mixed-Initiative Dialogue. In: Proceedings (2006)

    2006

  81. [89]

    L., Alor-Hern´ andez, G., Reyes Garc´ ıa, C

    Zatar´ ain-Cabada, R., Barr´ on Estrada, M. L., Alor-Hern´ andez, G., Reyes Garc´ ıa, C. A.: Emotion Recognition in Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Android-Based Mobile Devices. In: Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2014)

    2014

  82. [90]

    In: ANT/SEIT (2018)

    Xu, T., Zhou, Y., Wang, Z., Peng, Y.: Learning Emotions EEG-based Recognition and Brain Activity: A Survey Study on BCI for Intelligent Tutoring System. In: ANT/SEIT (2018)

    2018

  83. [91]

    In: 2019 International Conference on Intelligent Transporta- tion, Big Data & Smart City (ICITBS), pp

    Chen, Y., Zhang, Y.: Research on Intelligent Tutoring System Based on Data- Mining Algorithms. In: 2019 International Conference on Intelligent Transporta- tion, Big Data & Smart City (ICITBS), pp. 443–446 (2019). 49

    2019

  84. [92]

    Lin, C.-C., Huang, A. Y. Q., Lu, O. H. T.: Artificial intelligence in intelligent tutoring systems toward sustainable education: a systematic review. In: Smart Learning Environments, vol. 10, pp. 1–22 (2023)

    2023

  85. [93]

    R., Lin, J., Gatz, E., Gurung, A., Gupta, S., Norberg, K., Fancsali, S

    Thomas, D. R., Lin, J., Gatz, E., Gurung, A., Gupta, S., Norberg, K., Fancsali, S. E., Aleven, V., Branstetter, L., Brunskill, E., Koedinger, K.: Improving Student Learning with Hybrid Human-AI Tutoring: A Three-Study Quasi-Experimental Investigation. In: Proceedings of the 14...

    2023

  86. [94]

    In: Educational Psychologist, vol

    VanLehn, K.: The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems. In: Educational Psychologist, vol. 46, pp. 197–221 (2011)

    2011

  87. [95]

    J., Jordan, P

    Chi, M., VanLehn, K., Litman, D. J., Jordan, P. W.: An Evaluation of Pedagogical Tutorial Tactics for a Natural Language Tutoring System: A Reinforcement Learn- ing Approach. In: International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 21, pp. 83–113 (2011)

    2011

  88. [96]

    D., Burstein, J.: Automated Essay Scoring: A Cross-disciplinary Perspective

    Shermis, M. D., Burstein, J.: Automated Essay Scoring: A Cross-disciplinary Perspective. In: Proceedings (2003)

    2003

  89. [97]

    T., Heffernan, C., Mani, M.: Using Mixed-Effects Mod- eling to Analyze Different Grain-Sized Skill Models in an Intelligent Tutoring System

    Feng, M., Heffernan, N. T., Heffernan, C., Mani, M.: Using Mixed-Effects Mod- eling to Analyze Different Grain-Sized Skill Models in an Intelligent Tutoring System. In: IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol. 2, pp. 79–92 (2009)

    2009

  90. [98]

    In: Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol

    Phobun, P., Vicheanpanya, J.: Adaptive intelligent tutoring systems for e-learning systems. In: Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 2, pp. 4064–4069 (2010)

    2010

  91. [99]

    In: Technology, Knowledge and Learning (2024)

    Ifenthaler, D., Majumdar, R., Gorissen, P., Judge, M., Mishra, S., Raffaghelli, J., Shimada, A.: Artificial Intelligence in Education: Implications for Policymakers, Researchers, and Practitioners. In: Technology, Knowledge and Learning (2024)

    2024

  92. [100]

    In: Smart Cities (2024)

    Adel, A.: The Convergence of Intelligent Tutoring, Robotics, and IoT in Smart Education for the Transition from Industry 4.0 to 5.0. In: Smart Cities (2024)

    2024

  93. [101]

    ArXiv, abs/2404.02798 (2024)

    Laak, K.-J., Aru, J.: AI and personalized learning: bridging the gap with modern educational goals. ArXiv, abs/2404.02798 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  94. [102]

    L., Weitzman, L.: STEAMER: An Interactive Inspectable Simulation-Based Training System

    Hollan, J., Hutchins, E. L., Weitzman, L.: STEAMER: An Interactive Inspectable Simulation-Based Training System. In: AI Magazine, vol. 5, pp. 15–27 (1984)

    1984

  95. [103]

    M., Hughes, E

    Katz, S., Lesgold, A. M., Hughes, E. J., Peters, D., Eggan, G., Gordin, M., Greenberg, L.: Sherlock 2: An Intelligent Tutoring System Built on the LRDC Tutor Framework. (2020). 50

    2020

  96. [104]

    M., Alanazi, S

    Kamruzzaman, M. M., Alanazi, S. A., Alruwaili, M., Alshammari, N. O., Elaiwat, S., Abu-Zanona, M., Innab, N., Elzaghmouri, B. M., Alanazi, B. A.: AI- and IoT-Assisted Sustainable Education Systems during Pandemics, such as COVID-19, for Smart Cities. In: Sustainability (2023)

    2023

  97. [105]

    R., Yaqin, L

    Bilad, M. R., Yaqin, L. N., Zubaidah, S.: Recent Progress in the Use of Arti- ficial Intelligence Tools in Education. In: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika, vol. 8, pp. 51–57 (2024)

    2024

  98. [106]

    I.: Rule Based Multi Agent Student Modeling Intelligent Tutoring System

    Isaiah, A. I.: Rule Based Multi Agent Student Modeling Intelligent Tutoring System. In: Proceedings (2015)

    2015

  99. [107]

    In: AI Communications, vol

    Aamodt, A., Plaza, E.: Case-Based Reasoning: Foundational Issues, Method- ological Variations, and System Approaches. In: AI Communications, vol. 7, pp. 39–59 (1994)

    1994

  100. [108]

    R., Hadley, W

    Koedinger, K., Anderson, J. R., Hadley, W. H., Mark, M. A.: Intelligent Tutoring Goes To School in the Big City. In: Proceedings (1997)

    1997

  101. [109]

    J., Silliman, S.: ITSPOKE: An Intelligent Tutoring Spoken Dialogue System

    Litman, D. J., Silliman, S.: ITSPOKE: An Intelligent Tutoring Spoken Dialogue System. In: NAACL (2004)

    2004

  102. [110]

    In: The Adaptive Web (2007)

    Brusilovsky, P., Mill´ an, E.: User Models for Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Educational Systems. In: The Adaptive Web (2007)

    2007

  103. [111]

    J., Dal Mas, F., Gon¸ calves, S

    Sousa, M. J., Dal Mas, F., Gon¸ calves, S. P., Calandra, D. M.: AI and Blockchain as New Triggers in the Education Arena. In: European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, vol. 12, pp. 445–447 (2022). https://api. semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:248060133

    2022

  104. [112]

    In: Advanced Technology for Learning, vol

    Paredes, P., Rodr´ ıguez, P.: A Mixed Approach to Modelling Learning Styles in Adaptive Educational Hypermedia. In: Advanced Technology for Learning, vol. 1 (2004)

    2004

  105. [113]

    In: Springer Briefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering (2012)

    Manouselis, N., Drachsler, H., Verbert, K., Duval, E.: Recommender Systems for Learning. In: Springer Briefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering (2012)

    2012

  106. [114]

    T., Anderson, J

    Corbett, A. T., Anderson, J. R.: Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. In: User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, vol. 4, pp. 253–278 (2005)

    2005

  107. [115]

    K., Graesser, A

    D’Mello, S. K., Graesser, A. C.: AutoTutor and affective autotutor: Learning by talking with cognitively and emotionally intelligent computers that talk back. In: ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, vol. 2, 23:1–23:39 (2012)

    2012

  108. [116]

    R., Corbett, A

    Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K., Pelletier, R.: Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned. In: The Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 4, pp. 167–207 51 (1995)

    1995

  109. [117]

    R.: Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains

    de Jong, T., van Joolingen, W. R.: Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains. In: Review of Educational Research, vol. 68, pp. 179–201 (1998)

    1998

  110. [118]

    S., Hakkarainen, K.: Systematic Review of Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Hard Skills Training in Virtual Reality Envi- ronments

    Laine, J., Lindqvist, T., Korhonen, T. S., Hakkarainen, K.: Systematic Review of Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Hard Skills Training in Virtual Reality Envi- ronments. In: International Journal of Technology in Education and Science (2022)

    2022

  111. [119]

    C., Liu, L., Liu, Q., Adesope, O

    Nesbit, J. C., Liu, L., Liu, Q., Adesope, O. O.: Work in Progress: Intelli- gent Tutoring Systems in Computer Science and Software Engineering Education. (2015)

    2015

  112. [120]

    In: China Communications, vol

    Li, Z., Ma, Z.: A blockchain-based credible and secure education experi- ence data management scheme supporting for searchable encryption. In: China Communications, vol. 18, pp. 172–183 (2021)

    2021

  113. [121]

    ArXiv, abs/2401.07518 (2024)

    Lan, Y., Li, X., Du, H., Lu, X., Gao, M., Qian, W., Zhou, A.: Survey of Natural Language Processing for Education: Taxonomy, Systematic Review, and Future Trends. ArXiv, abs/2401.07518 (2024)

    2024

  114. [122]

    In: European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences (2023)

    Vindigni, G.: Adaptive and Re-adaptive Pedagogies in Higher Education: A Comparative, Longitudinal Study of Their Impact on Professional Competence Development across Diverse Curricula. In: European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences (2023)

    2023

  115. [123]

    In: Heliyon, vol

    Muangprathub, J., Boonjing, V., Chamnongthai, K.: Learning recommendation with formal concept analysis for intelligent tutoring system. In: Heliyon, vol. 6 (2020)

    2020

  116. [124]

    A., Abu Naser, S

    Al-Nakhal, M. A., Abu Naser, S. S.: Adaptive Intelligent Tutoring System for learning Computer Theory. (2017)

    2017

  117. [125]

    Hooshyar, D., Ahmad, R. B., Yousefi, M., Fathi, M., Horng, S.-J., Lim, H.: Applying an online game-based formative assessment in a flowchart-based intel- ligent tutoring system for improving problem-solving skills. In: Computers & Education, vol. 94, pp. 18–36 (2016)

    2016

  118. [126]

    In: Journal of Educational Psychology, vol

    Steenbergen-Hu, S., Cooper, H.: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems on college students’ academic learning. In: Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 106, pp. 331–347 (2014)

    2014

  119. [127]

    In: Journal of Educational Psychology, vol

    Steenbergen-Hu, S., Cooper, H.: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intel- ligent tutoring systems on K–12 students’ mathematical learning. In: Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 105, pp. 970–987 (2013). 52

    2013

  120. [128]

    A., Robert, S.: Learning Logical Reasoning Using an Intelligent Tutoring System: A Hybrid Approach to Student Modeling

    Nkambou, R., Brisson, J., Nyamen Tato, A. A., Robert, S.: Learning Logical Reasoning Using an Intelligent Tutoring System: A Hybrid Approach to Student Modeling. In: AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2023)

    2023

  121. [129]

    T., Trung, N

    Binh, H. T., Trung, N. Q., Duy, B. T.: Responsive student model in an intelligent tutoring system and its evaluation. In: Education and Information Technologies, vol. 26, pp. 4969–4991 (2021)

    2021

  122. [130]

    In: Education and Information Technologies, pp

    Wang, H., Tlili, A., Huang, R., Cai, Z., Li, M., Cheng, Z., Yang, D., Li, M., Zhu, X., Fei, C.: Examining the applications of intelligent tutoring systems in real educational contexts: A systematic literature review from the social experiment perspective. In: Education and Inf...

    2023

  123. [131]

    D.: Usability evaluation of intelligent tutoring system

    Chughtai, R., Zhang, S., Craig, S. D.: Usability evaluation of intelligent tutoring system. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 59, pp. 367–371 (2015)

    2015

  124. [132]

    M., Milligan, S., Selwyn, N., Gaˇ sevi´ c, D.: Assessment in the age of artificial intelligence

    Swiecki, Z., Khosravi, H., Chen, G., Mart´ ınez Maldonado, R., Lodge, J. M., Milligan, S., Selwyn, N., Gaˇ sevi´ c, D.: Assessment in the age of artificial intelligence. In: Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3, 100075 (2022)

    2022

  125. [133]

    T., Koedinger, K.: Intelligent Tutoring Systems are Missing the Tutor: Building a More Strategic Dialog-Based Tutor

    Heffernan, N. T., Koedinger, K.: Intelligent Tutoring Systems are Missing the Tutor: Building a More Strategic Dialog-Based Tutor. Online (2000). https://api. semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:62663223

    2000

  126. [134]

    C., Llamas, M.: A Case-Based Approach for Building Intelligent Tutoring Systems

    Gonz´ alez, C., Burguillo, J. C., Llamas, M.: A Case-Based Approach for Building Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In: 2006 7th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training, pp. 442–446 (2006)

    2006

  127. [135]

    A.: Using adaptive learning technologies to personalize instruc- tion to student interests: The impact of relevant contexts on performance and learning outcomes

    Walkington, C. A.: Using adaptive learning technologies to personalize instruc- tion to student interests: The impact of relevant contexts on performance and learning outcomes. In: Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 105, pp. 932–945 (2013)

    2013

  128. [136]

    In: Education and Information Technologies, vol

    Bellarhmouch, Y., Jeghal, A., Tairi, H., Benjelloun, N.: A proposed architec- tural learner model for a personalized learning environment. In: Education and Information Technologies, vol. 28, pp. 4243–4263 (2022)

    2022

  129. [137]

    P., van Hillegersberg, J., van den Berg, S

    Abdi, A., Sedrakyan, G., Veldkamp, B. P., van Hillegersberg, J., van den Berg, S. M.: Students feedback analysis model using deep learning-based method and linguistic knowledge for intelligent educational systems. In: Soft Computing, vol. 27, pp. 14073–14094 (2023)

    2023

  130. [138]

    A., Noor, N

    Hasan, M. A., Noor, N. F. M., Rahman, S. S. A., Rahman, M. M.: The Transition From Intelligent to Affective Tutoring System: A Review and Open Issues. In: IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 204612–204638 (2020). 53

    2020

  131. [139]

    R., Rakhshan, M., Keikha, L., Ghazi Saeedi, M.: Intelligent tutoring systems: a systematic review of characteristics, applications, and evaluation methods

    Mousavinasab, E., Zarifsanaiey, N., Niakan Kalhori, S. R., Rakhshan, M., Keikha, L., Ghazi Saeedi, M.: Intelligent tutoring systems: a systematic review of characteristics, applications, and evaluation methods. In: Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 29, pp. 142–163 (2018)

    2018

  132. [140]

    C., Sikumbang, H.: Characteristics and Appli- cation of Intelligent Tutoring Systems: A Review

    Djunaidi, K., Siswipraptini, P. C., Sikumbang, H.: Characteristics and Appli- cation of Intelligent Tutoring Systems: A Review. In: 2023 10th International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS), pp. 1–7 (2023)

    2023

  133. [141]

    J., Gonz´ alez-Morcillo, C., Albusac, J., Vallejo-Fernandez, D.: An intelligent tutoring system for supporting active learning: A case study on predictive parsing learning

    Castro-Schez, J. J., Gonz´ alez-Morcillo, C., Albusac, J., Vallejo-Fernandez, D.: An intelligent tutoring system for supporting active learning: A case study on predictive parsing learning. In: Information Sciences, vol. 544, pp. 446–468 (2020)

    2020

  134. [142]

    In: International Journal of Education and Humanities (2024)

    Ou, S.: Transforming Education: The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in The Students Academic Performance. In: International Journal of Education and Humanities (2024)

    2024

  135. [143]

    In: Education Sciences (2022)

    Mainetti, L., Paiano, R., Pedone, M., Quarta, M., Dervishi, E.: Digital Brick: Enhancing the Student Experience Using Blockchain, Open Badges and Recom- mendations. In: Education Sciences (2022)

    2022

  136. [144]

    In: SEFM Workshops (2021)

    Terzi, S., Stamelos, I., Votis, K., Tsiatsos, T.: A Life-Long Learning Edu- cation Passport Powered by Blockchain Technology and Verifiable Digital Cre- dentials: The BlockAdemiC Project. In: SEFM Workshops (2021). https://api. semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:252546481

    2021

  137. [145]

    In: Asia Pacific Education Review, vol

    Guo, L., Wang, D., Gu, F., Li, Y., Wang, Y., Zhou, R.: Evolution and trends in intelligent tutoring systems research: a multidisciplinary and scientometric view. In: Asia Pacific Education Review, vol. 22, pp. 441–461 (2021)

    2021

  138. [146]

    A., Ubaid, A., Hussain, O

    Alsobhi, H., Alakhtar, R. A., Ubaid, A., Hussain, O. K., Hussain, F. K.: Blockchain-based micro-credentialing system in higher education institutions: Systematic literature review. In: Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 265, 110238 (2023)

    2023

  139. [147]

    J.: An Adaptive Framework of Learner Model Using Learner Characteristics for Intelligent Tutoring Systems

    Kumar, A., Ahuja, N. J.: An Adaptive Framework of Learner Model Using Learner Characteristics for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In: Advances in Intelli- gent Systems and Computing (2019)

    2019

  140. [148]

    Noodle Factory. (2024). https://www.noodlefactory.ai/ Accessed: 2024-07-25

    2024

  141. [149]

    Tutello. (2024). https://www.tutello.com/ Accessed: 2024-07-25

    2024

  142. [150]

    K., C ¸ etin,˙I.: Design framework of adaptive intelligent tutoring systems

    Er¨ umit, A. K., C ¸ etin,˙I.: Design framework of adaptive intelligent tutoring systems. In: Education and Information Technologies, vol. 25, pp. 4477–4500 (2020). 54

    2020

  143. [151]

    C.: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of ALEKS on learning

    Fang, Y., Ren, Z., Hu, X., Graesser, A. C.: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of ALEKS on learning. In: Educational Psychology, vol. 39, pp. 1278–1292 (2018)

    2018

  144. [152]

    J., Kao, D.: A Systematic Review of Literature on the Effectiveness of Intelligent Tutoring Systems in STEM

    Feng, S., Magana, A. J., Kao, D.: A Systematic Review of Literature on the Effectiveness of Intelligent Tutoring Systems in STEM. In: 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. 1–9 (2021)

    2021

  145. [153]

    C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., et al.: A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews

    Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., et al.: A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. In: BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 16 (2016)

    2016

  146. [154]

    Nkambou, R., Mizoguchi, R., Bourdeau, J.: Advances in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. (2010)

    2010

  147. [155]

    In: International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol

    VanLehn, K.: The Behavior of Tutoring Systems. In: International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 16, pp. 227–265 (2006)

    2006

  148. [156]

    J.: Focus on Formative Feedback

    Shute, V. J.: Focus on Formative Feedback. In: Review of Educational Research, vol. 78, pp. 153–189 (2007)

    2007

  149. [157]

    O., Steinhauser, N

    Dzikovska, M. O., Steinhauser, N. B., Farrow, E., Moore, J. D., Campbell, G. E.: BEETLE II: Deep Natural Language Understanding and Automatic Feed- back Generation for Intelligent Tutoring in Basic Electricity and Electronics. In: International Journal of Artificial Intelligen...

    2014

  150. [158]

    In: IEEE Access, vol

    Paladines, J., Ram´ ırez, J.: A Systematic Literature Review of Intelligent Tutor- ing Systems With Dialogue in Natural Language. In: IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 164246–164267 (2020)

    2020

  151. [159]

    A.: Incorporating Focus to Enhance Staff-student Interactions in For- mative Feedback

    Modi, B. A.: Incorporating Focus to Enhance Staff-student Interactions in For- mative Feedback. In: Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Vol. 2 (2022)

    2022

  152. [160]

    F.: A machine learning approach for intelligent tutoring systems

    Sindi, H. F.: A machine learning approach for intelligent tutoring systems. (2005)

    2005

  153. [161]

    In: Expert Systems with Applications, vol

    Jeremi´ c, Z., Jovanovi´ c, J., Gaˇ sevi´ c, D.: Student modeling and assessment in intelligent tutoring of software patterns. In: Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, pp. 210–222 (2012)

    2012

  154. [162]

    Gong, Y.-T.: Student Modeling in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. (2014). https: //api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:108388149

    2014

  155. [163]

    Kass, R.: Student Modeling in Intelligent Tutoring Systems — Implications for User Modeling. (1989). 55

    1989

  156. [164]

    M.: Transferable Student Performance Modeling for Intelligent Tutoring Systems

    Schmucker, R., Mitchell, T. M.: Transferable Student Performance Modeling for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ArXiv, abs/2202.03980 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  157. [165]

    B.: Bayesian Networks in Intelligent Tutoring Systems as an Assess- ment of Student Performance using Student Modeling

    Alday, R. B.: Bayesian Networks in Intelligent Tutoring Systems as an Assess- ment of Student Performance using Student Modeling. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Systems (2018)

    2018

  158. [166]

    In: Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol

    Yang, C., Chiang, F.-K., Cheng, Q., Ji, J.: Machine Learning-Based Student Modeling Methodology for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In: Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 59, pp. 1015–1035 (2021)

    2021

  159. [167]

    In: Applied Sciences (2021)

    Gonz´ alez-Calatayud, V., Prendes-Espinosa, P., Roig-Vila, R.: Artificial Intel- ligence for Student Assessment: A Systematic Review. In: Applied Sciences (2021)

    2021

  160. [168]

    C., Junior, G

    dos Santos, S. C., Junior, G. A. S.: Opportunities and Challenges of AI to Support Student Assessment in Computing Education: A Systematic Literature Review. In: International Conference on Computer Supported Education (2024)

    2024

  161. [169]

    In: PAIS@ECAI (2022)

    Kulshreshtha, D., Shayan, M., Belfer, R., Reddy, S., Serban, I., Kochmar, E.: Few-shot Question Generation for Personalized Feedback in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In: PAIS@ECAI (2022)

    2022

  162. [170]

    Bai, J. Y. H., Zawacki-Richter, O., Bozkurt, A., Lee, K., Fanguy, M., Sari, B. C., Mar´ ın, V. I.: Automated Essay Scoring (AES) Systems: Opportunities and Chal- lenges for Open and Distance Education. In: Tenth Pan-Commonwealth Forum on Open Learning (2022)

    2022

  163. [171]

    A.: Towards Smart Education through Internet of Things: A Survey

    Badshah, A., Ghani, A., Daud, A., Jalal, A., Bilal, M., Crowcroft, J. A.: Towards Smart Education through Internet of Things: A Survey. In: ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 56, pp. 1–33 (2023)

    2023

  164. [172]

    Mokmin, N. A. M., Masood, M.: The design and development of an intelli- gent tutoring system as a part of the architecture of internet of things (IoT). In: International Conference on Telecommunications and Communication Engineering (2017)

    2017

  165. [173]

    In: 2024 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp

    Frank, L., Herth, F., Stuwe, P., Klaiber, M., Gerschner, F., Theissler, A.: Lever- aging GenAI for an Intelligent Tutoring System for R: A Quantitative Evaluation of Large Language Models. In: 2024 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 1–9 (2024)

    2024

  166. [174]

    In: Frontiers in Education (2023)

    Yu, H., Guo, Y.: Generative artificial intelligence empowers educational reform: current status, issues, and prospects. In: Frontiers in Education (2023)

    2023

  167. [175]

    J.: Towards Educator-Driven Tutor Authoring: Genera- tive AI Approaches for Creating Intelligent Tutor Interfaces

    Cal` o, T., MacLellan, C. J.: Towards Educator-Driven Tutor Authoring: Genera- tive AI Approaches for Creating Intelligent Tutor Interfaces. In: ACM Conference 56 on Learning @ Scale (2024)

    2024

  168. [176]

    In: AI and Ethics, vol

    Akgun, S., Greenhow, C.: Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings. In: AI and Ethics, vol. 2, pp. 431–440 (2021)

    2021

  169. [177]

    In: Education and Information Technologies (2024)

    Airaj, M.: Ethical artificial intelligence for teaching-learning in higher education. In: Education and Information Technologies (2024)

    2024

  170. [178]

    B., Karki, P

    Khatri, B. B., Karki, P. D.: Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Higher Educa- tion: Growing Academic Integrity and Ethical Concerns. In: Nepalese Journal of Development and Rural Studies (2023)

    2023

  171. [180]

    In: International Journal of Advanced Natural Sciences and Engineering Researches, vol

    Abazi Chaushi, B., Ismaili, F., Chaushi, A.: Pros and Cons of Artificial Intelli- gence in Education. In: International Journal of Advanced Natural Sciences and Engineering Researches, vol. 8, pp. 51–57 (2024)

    2024

  172. [181]

    In: Computers, vol

    Govea, J., Ocampo, E., Revelo-Tapia, S., Villegas, W.: Optimization and Scal- ability of Educational Platforms: Integration of Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Computing. In: Computers, vol. 12, 223 (2023). doi:10.3390/computers12110223

    2023 doi

  173. [182]

    S., Jia, X., Lee, J., Sun, K., Colombo, A

    Peres, R. S., Jia, X., Lee, J., Sun, K., Colombo, A. W., Barata, J.: Industrial Artificial Intelligence in Industry 4.0 - Systematic Review, Challenges and Outlook. In: IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 220121–220139 (2020)

    2020

  174. [183]

    A., Kazim, E.: Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd): a high- level academic and industry note 2021

    Chaudhry, M. A., Kazim, E.: Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd): a high- level academic and industry note 2021. In: AI and Ethics, vol. 2, pp. 157–165 (2021)

    2021

  175. [184]

    C.: New Potentials for Data-Driven Intelligent Tutoring System Development and Optimization

    Koedinger, K., Brunskill, E., Baker, R., McLaughlin, E., Stamper, J. C.: New Potentials for Data-Driven Intelligent Tutoring System Development and Optimization. In: AI Magazine, vol. 34, pp. 27–41 (2013)

    2013

  176. [185]

    ArXiv, abs/2405.04645 (2024)

    Stamper, J., Xiao, R., Hou, X.: Enhancing LLM-Based Feedback: Insights from Intelligent Tutoring Systems and the Learning Sciences. ArXiv, abs/2405.04645 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  177. [186]

    Ramadhan, A., Warnars, H. L. H. S., Razak, F. H. A.: Combining intelligent tutoring systems and gamification: a systematic literature review. In: Education and Information Technologies, vol. 29, pp. 6753–6789 (2023)

    2023

  178. [187]

    In: IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol

    Liu, H., Zhang, Y., Jia, J.: The Design of Guiding and Adaptive Prompts for Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Its Effect on Students’ Mathematics Learning. In: IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol. 17, pp. 1379–1389 (2024). 57

    2024

  179. [188]

    Heilman, M.: Language Learning: Challenges for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. (2006)

    2006

  180. [189]

    L., Greene, M

    Bernacki, M. L., Greene, M. J., Lobczowski, N. G.: A Systematic Review of Research on Personalized Learning: Personalized by Whom, to What, How, and for What Purpose(s)? In: Educational Psychology Review, vol. 33, pp. 1675–1715 (2021)

    2021

  181. [190]

    J., Yan, D., Gobert, J

    Mislevy, R. J., Yan, D., Gobert, J. D., Sao Pedro, M. A.: Automated Scoring in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. (2020)

    2020

  182. [191]

    A., Hassan, H

    Hussein, M. A., Hassan, H. A., Nassef, M.: Automated language essay scoring systems: a literature review. In: PeerJ Computer Science, vol. 5 (2019)

    2019

  183. [192]

    C., VanLehn, K., Ros´ e, C

    Graesser, A. C., VanLehn, K., Ros´ e, C. P., Jordan, P. W., Harter, D.: Intelligent Tutoring Systems with Conversational Dialogue. In: AI Magazine, vol. 22, pp. 39–52 (2001)

    2001

  184. [193]

    B´ obo, M. L. D. R., Campos, F., Stroele, V., David, J. M. N., Braga, R. I., Torrent, T. T.: Using Sentiment Analysis to Identify Student Emotional State to Avoid Dropout in E-Learning. In: International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, vol. 20, pp. 1–24 (2022)

    2022

  185. [194]

    In: Cognitive Systems Research, vol

    Sychev, O.: Educational models for cognition: Methodology of modeling intel- lectual skills for intelligent tutoring systems. In: Cognitive Systems Research, vol. 87 (2024)

    2024

  186. [195]

    In: International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (2024)

    Soto-Forero, D., Ackermann, S., Betbeder, M.-L., Henriet, J.: The Intelligent Tutoring System AI-VT with Case-Based Reasoning and Real Time Recommender Models. In: International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (2024)

    2024

  187. [196]

    H., Ramachandran, S.: A Case-Based Reasoning Approach to Inter- net Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) and ITS Authoring

    Stottler, R. H., Ramachandran, S.: A Case-Based Reasoning Approach to Inter- net Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) and ITS Authoring. In: The Florida AI Research Society (1999)

    1999

  188. [197]

    In: AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2007)

    Soh, L.-K.: Integrated Introspective Case-Based Reasoning for Intelligent Tutor- ing Systems. In: AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2007)

    2007

  189. [198]

    Masood, M., Mokmin, N. A. M.: Case-based Reasoning Intelligent Tutoring Sys- tem: An Application of Big Data and IoT. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Big Data Research (2017)

    2017

  190. [199]

    In: Intelligent Decision Technologies, vol

    Hafidi, M., Bensebaa, T.: Design and evaluation of an adaptive and intelligent tutoring system by expert system. In: Intelligent Decision Technologies, vol. 7, pp. 253–264 (2013). 58

    2013

  191. [200]

    Zarandi, M. H. F., Khademian, M., Minaei-Bidgoli, B., Turksen, I. B.: A Fuzzy Expert System Architecture for Intelligent Tutoring Systems: A Cognitive Mapping Approach. In: Journal of Intelligent Learning Systems and Applications, vol. 04, pp. 29–40 (2012)

    2012

  192. [201]

    D., de Melo, F

    de Carvalho, S. D., de Melo, F. R., Flˆ ores, E. L., Pires, S. R., Loja, L. F. B.: Intelligent tutoring system using expert knowledge and Kohonen maps with automated training. In: Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 32, pp. 13577– 13589 (2020)

    2020

  193. [202]

    In: 2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp

    Mitrovic, A., Williamson, C., Bebbington, A., Mathews, M., Suraweera, P., Mar- tin, B., Thomson, D., Holland, J.: Thermo-Tutor: An Intelligent Tutoring System for thermodynamics. In: 2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 378–385 (2011)

    2011

  194. [203]

    K., Olney, A

    D’Mello, S. K., Olney, A. M., Williams, C., Hays, P.: Gaze tutor: A gaze-reactive intelligent tutoring system. In: International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 70, pp. 377–398 (2012)

    2012

  195. [204]

    A., Le˜ ao, L

    Pereira, L. A., Le˜ ao, L. L. S., Dermeval, D., Coelho, J. A. P. M.: ECG Tutor: a gamified intelligent tutoring system for electrocardiogram teaching. In: Revista Brasileira de Educa¸ c˜ ao M´ edica (2023)

    2023

  196. [205]

    In: International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology (2024)

    Shah, T.: AI-Powered Personalised Learning Plans for Intelligent Tutoring Sys- tems. In: International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology (2024)

    2024

  197. [206]

    A., Salas, E.: Examining Challenges and Approaches to Building Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Teams

    Sottilare, R. A., Salas, E.: Examining Challenges and Approaches to Building Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Teams. In: Research on Managing Groups and Teams (2018)

    2018

  198. [207]

    D., Belfer, R., Gupta, V., Serban, I., Pineau, J.: Automated Personalized Feedback Improves Learning Gains in An Intelligent Tutoring System

    Kochmar, E., Vu, D. D., Belfer, R., Gupta, V., Serban, I., Pineau, J.: Automated Personalized Feedback Improves Learning Gains in An Intelligent Tutoring System. In: Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 12164, pp. 140–146 (2020)

    2020

  199. [208]

    I., Evangelidis, G.: Aug- mented Reality and Virtual Reality in Education: Public Perspectives, Sentiments, Attitudes, and Discourses

    Lampropoulos, G., Keramopoulos, E., Diamantaras, K. I., Evangelidis, G.: Aug- mented Reality and Virtual Reality in Education: Public Perspectives, Sentiments, Attitudes, and Discourses. In: Education Sciences (2022)

    2022

  200. [209]

    A., Fletcher, J

    Kulik, J. A., Fletcher, J. D.: Effectiveness of Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In: Review of Educational Research, vol. 86, pp. 42–78 (2016)

    2016

  201. [210]

    In: Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol

    Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., Hwang, G.-J.: Application and theory gaps during the rise of Artificial Intelligence in Education. In: Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, 100002 (2020). 59

    2020

  202. [211]

    In: Contemporary Educational Technology, vol

    Bacca-Acosta, J., ´Avila-Garz´ on, C., Kinshuk, Duarte, J., Betancourt, J.: Aug- mented Reality in Education: An Overview of Twenty-Five Years of Research. In: Contemporary Educational Technology, vol. 13, ep302 (2021)

    2021

  203. [212]

    A.: Intelligent Language Tutor- ing System: Integrating Intelligent Computer-Assisted Language Learning Into Language Education

    Tafazoli, D., G´ omez Mar´ ıa, E., Huertas Abril, C. A.: Intelligent Language Tutor- ing System: Integrating Intelligent Computer-Assisted Language Learning Into Language Education. In: International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, vol. 15, pp. 6...

    2019

  204. [213]

    In: IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, vol

    Kelkar, S.: Between AI and Learning Science: The Evolution and Commercializa- tion of Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In: IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, vol. 44, pp. 20–30 (2022)

    2022

  205. [214]

    In: Journal of Intelligence and Knowledge Engineering (2024)

    Deng, Y., Wu, C.: Research on the Construction of Mobile Terminal Assisted Language Learning Model Based on Artificial Intelligence Technology. In: Journal of Intelligence and Knowledge Engineering (2024)

    2024

  206. [215]

    In: Arab World English Journal (2023)

    Dahbi, M.: Integrating an Intelligent Language Tutoring System in Teaching English Grammar. In: Arab World English Journal (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.