Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 39 references

ScenePainter: Semantically Consistent Perpetual 3D Scene Generation with Concept Relation Alignment

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read ScenePainter claims that a hierarchical scene concept graph, learned from the first view and refined during generation, prevents semantic drift in perpetual 3D scene expansion.

desk verdict A credible scene-level customization method with a real novelty gap vs. prior work, but the paper's central claim about eliminating long-range semantic drift is only weakly supported because drift is never directly measured. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.19058 v1 pith:3HLGGPET submitted 2025-07-25 cs.CV

Chong Xia , Shengjun Zhang , Fangfu Liu , Chang Liu , Khodchaphun Hirunyaratsameewong , Yueqi Duan This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords perpetual3Dscenegenerationsemanticdriftconceptgraphscene-levelcustomizationimageoutpaintingdiffusionmodelsuser-guidededitingtextualinversion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

ScenePainter addresses the semantic drift that plagues perpetual 3D scene generation, where iterated outpainting gradually turns a coherent scene into a different one. The paper argues that the fix is to give the outpainting model a scene-specific prior extracted from the first view, encoded as a hierarchical graph of concepts and their relations. It constructs this SceneConceptGraph with optimized textual embeddings and model weights, then uses it to initialize and continuously refine the outpainter. If the claim is right, long-range view sequences remain semantically consistent while users can still add, remove, or alter objects, which would make single-image 3D exploration and long video synthesis more practical.

What carries the argument

The central object is the SceneConceptGraph, a three-layer hierarchical graph with a root node for global environment and style, second-layer nodes for category regions, and third-layer nodes for individual objects, connected by relation edges that encode spatial layout and semantic connections. It carries the argument by acting as a persistent scene memory: concept-relation pairs are converted into optimized textual embeddings and model weights, so the graph both describes the scene and steers the outpainter. During test-time refinement, only one relation edge is updated per step, keeping the process fast while letting the scene evolve through user text commands.

What would settle it

Generate a long view sequence (for example, 30 or more frames) from a single image with ScenePainter, and compare a run with the SceneConceptGraph and refinement disabled against a full run using CLIP-I and DINO between the first and last views; if the ablated run matches the full method, the graph is not what prevents semantic drift. Alternatively, if editing one concept causes unrelated concepts or the global style to change in later frames, the one-edge-per-step refinement claim is violated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Starting from one image, ScenePainter builds a three-level SceneConceptGraph whose nodes are the overall environment and style, category regions, and individual objects, and whose edges encode spatial and semantic relations. Each concept-relation pair is turned into dedicated textual embeddings, optimized together with a diffusion model by masked reconstruction, scene-prior preservation, and cross-attention losses, so the model learns what the scene is both as a whole and as a set of related parts. This customized model becomes the outpainter's initialization via Blended Latent Diffusion, and during view generation the graph is refined one edge at a time, updating text embeddings and model weights so newly added, changed, or removed concepts stay consistent with the original environment. The paper claims that this alignment removes the accumulated deviation that causes semantic drift and produces view sequences that are both consistent and diverse, supported by fidelity metrics and user preference over previous methods.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the scene-specific prior learned from the first view remains a valid guide for every later outpainting step, so errors in the initial SceneConceptGraph do not compound as the camera moves.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Long view sequences generated from a single image will keep a stable overall style, object set, and spatial layout instead of drifting into a different scene.
  • Users can edit scenes while they are generated using short text handles: add a bookshelf, remove a chair, recolor a blanket, or recombine concept relations.
  • Combining the graph with a 3D representation pipeline yields 3D structures that stay geometrically plausible because semantic consistency prevents the objects and surroundings from distorting.
  • The scene-specific prior can be transferred to any outpainting module that can be initialized from the customized text-to-image model, not just the one used in the paper.
  • The approach offers a practical keyframing path from one picture to long, editable 3D video sequences.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the SceneConceptGraph could be reused as a semantic memory for interactive world building, letting an agent accumulate what it knows about a scene and query or update it as new views arrive.
  • One could test the graph's generality by extending the relation types beyond spatial layout and style, for example to temporal or causal relations, which would let the same framework sustain story-like scene evolution.
  • The error-compounding assumption suggests a stress test: if refinement updates only one edge per frame, scenes with many simultaneous changes may eventually outrun the graph and drift; weighting or scheduling multiple edge updates could be a natural extension.
  • Because the method optimizes embeddings and weights at test time, its quick refinement step makes it suitable for offline keyframe generation; a distilled or faster variant would be needed for real-time navigation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes ScenePainter, a two-stage framework for perpetual 3D scene generation from a single image. In the first stage, it constructs a hierarchical SceneConceptGraph with three levels of scene concepts and three relation types, and optimizes dedicated text embeddings and a diffusion model using masked reconstruction, prior preservation, and cross-attention losses. In the second stage, the outpainter is initialized with the optimized model and the graph is refined at test time by updating one edge at a time, enabling user-driven add, remove, or modify operations on scene concepts. The paper reports qualitative comparisons, DINO/CLIP-I fidelity scores, a user study, and ablations, and claims to overcome semantic drift in long-range 3D view sequences.

Significance. The paper addresses a real problem in perpetual 3D scene generation: semantic drift in autoregressive outpainting. The proposed SceneConceptGraph is an interpretable and structured scene prior, and the two-stage pipeline of construction and test-time refinement is a plausible way to condition an outpainter. The ablations indicate that the loss components and graph levels contribute to customization quality. If the long-range consistency claim were properly validated, this would be a useful contribution to 3D content generation and editing. The paper also offers a meaningful extension of customization methods from single-object or multi-object settings to scene-level concepts and relations.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.3, Table 2] The user study in Table 2 reports preference percentages (e.g., 89.3% quality over WonderJourney) without the number of participants, confidence intervals, or significance tests. Because the central claim about consistency and diversity in long-range view sequences rests on this table, the evidence is statistically unsubstantiated. Please report sample size, per-scene variance, and a significance test (e.g., bootstrap or sign test), and clarify whether ties were allowed.
  2. [Section 4.3, Table 1 and Section 3.2] The DINO/CLIP-I metrics in Table 1 are computed on a single generated image against the input image. Since the SceneConceptGraph and the fine-tuned model are optimized with a reconstruction loss on that same input (Eq. 5), high fidelity is partly by construction. More importantly, these scores do not measure semantic consistency across the iterated outpainting sequence of Section 3.1. The paper's headline claim of overcoming semantic drift needs a direct measurement of drift over the generated sequence, e.g., CLIP/DINO similarity between frame 1 and frame T, or per-frame semantic alignment with the SceneConceptGraph.
  3. [Section 3.3] The refinement stage updates only one relation edge between the first-level concept v0 and a user-specified second-level concept per step. The paper assumes this sparse update plus the fixed initialization prevents accumulated drift, but no experiment validates that assumption. Please provide either a long-sequence study measuring drift over many outpainting steps (e.g., 50-100 frames) or an analysis of how the graph and model are updated each step and whether errors compound.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 4.5] The values of lambda_prior and lambda_attn in Eq. (5) are not reported; please specify them in the implementation details.
  2. [Figure 2] The colored dots and regions in Figure 2 are mentioned in the caption but are not clearly labeled in the figure; please add a legend for the concept nodes and relation edges.
  3. [Section 5] The conclusion states that the method 'eliminates the semantic drift problem,' which is stronger than the evidence; I suggest wording such as 'substantially reduces observed semantic drift in the tested scenarios.'
  4. [Section 4.2] The qualitative comparison does not state how many scenes are shown in the figures or whether the selected examples are representative; please add a brief description of the selection protocol.
  5. [Section 2] The discussion of video generation methods is brief; consider adding citations for recent long-video models to clarify the distinction between viewpoint-centric 3D generation and object-centric video generation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the SceneConceptGraph and scene prior are trained inputs, not disguised predictions; the long-range drift claim is weakly evidenced but not derived from its own outputs.

full rationale

ScenePainter is an empirical systems paper rather than a formal derivation. The claimed chain is: fit scene-specific textual embeddings and model weights to the first view using the losses in Eq. 5, convert the fitted text-to-image model into an outpainter via Blended Latent Diffusion, and then use that outpainter with test-time refinement to generate subsequent views. None of these steps uses the target claim ('semantic drift is overcome') as an input. The SceneConceptGraph is constructed from the initial view by segmentation and optimization, not defined in terms of the drift metric. The DINO/CLIP-I scores in Table 1 compare generated images with the same image used for customization; this is standard identity-preservation evaluation in the customization literature and is not a prediction of an independent quantity. The main 3D-consistency claim rests on the user study in Table 2 and qualitative comparisons, which are methodologically thin (no number of users, no significance test, no direct first-to-last drift measurement), but weak evidence is not circularity. No load-bearing self-citation appears: the cited customization and 3D-generation works are by other groups, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work. Therefore no step reduces by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The method relies on standard diffusion and segmentation models, but introduces several hand-chosen hyperparameters and a new graph structure whose validity is shown only within the paper's own experiments.

free parameters (3)
  • lambda_prior = not reported
    Weight for the scene-specific prior preservation loss in Eq. (5), chosen by hand.
  • lambda_attn = not reported
    Weight for the cross-attention loss in Eq. (5), chosen by hand.
  • training steps and learning rates = 400 steps, 1e-6 (TI), 400 steps, 1e-4 (DB), 50 steps, 1e-4 (refinement)
    Manually selected hyperparameters for the customization and refinement stages, as reported in Section 4.5.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption An off-the-shelf monocular depth estimator provides sufficient geometric accuracy for unprojection.
    Section 3.1, Eq. (1) uses DepthEstimator without fine-tuning or error analysis, yet the whole 3D pipeline depends on it.
  • domain assumption The combination of Textual Inversion and DreamBooth in two phases preserves scene identity while allowing diversity.
    Section 3.2 adopts this combination from Break-A-Scene without proving it holds for entire scenes rather than individual objects.
  • domain assumption The cross-attention loss aligns each textual handle with its mask in the generated image.
    Section 3.2, Eq. (5) includes L_attn, and the paper provides only visual evidence that the alignment holds.
invented entities (1)
  • SceneConceptGraph
    purpose: Hierarchical graph (three levels) encoding scene concepts and their relations to guide the outpainting model.
    Only evaluated through the paper's own ablations and qualitative examples; no external benchmark or formal definition is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of ScenePainter: Semantically Consistent Perpetual 3D Scene Generation with Concept Relation Alignment." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3HLGGPET

@misc{pith2026250719058,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: ScenePainter: Semantically Consistent Perpetual 3D Scene Generation with Concept Relation Alignment},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3HLGGPET}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.19058}
}
read the original abstract

Perpetual 3D scene generation aims to produce long-range and coherent 3D view sequences, which is applicable for long-term video synthesis and 3D scene reconstruction. Existing methods follow a "navigate-and-imagine" fashion and rely on outpainting for successive view expansion. However, the generated view sequences suffer from semantic drift issue derived from the accumulated deviation of the outpainting module. To tackle this challenge, we propose ScenePainter, a new framework for semantically consistent 3D scene generation, which aligns the outpainter's scene-specific prior with the comprehension of the current scene. To be specific, we introduce a hierarchical graph structure dubbed SceneConceptGraph to construct relations among multi-level scene concepts, which directs the outpainter for consistent novel views and can be dynamically refined to enhance diversity. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our framework overcomes the semantic drift issue and generates more consistent and immersive 3D view sequences. Project Page: https://xiac20.github.io/ScenePainter/.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.19058 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. We propose ScenePainter, which aims to generate semantically consistent yet visually diverse 3D view sequences starting from a single view. We show painted images from the view of a moist and shadowed street with a receding 3D camera motion. ScenePainter can generate plausible and consistent content given the first view while maintaining diversity in forms and appearances. Abstract Perpetual 3D scene generation aims… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overall framework of our approach ScenePainter. We propose a two-stage framework that constructs and refines scene concept relations with the graph structure SceneConceptGraph, and aligns the outpainting model with the scene-specific prior during the ongoing painting process. We use colored dots and regions to represent scene concept nodes and their masks, and black and red lines in SceneConceptGraph to denote the i… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison with other customization methods. InstantBooth and IP-Adapter are designed for the whole image customization without concept mask, while Custom Diffusion and Break-A-Scene focus on multi-concept customization. All these methods fail to achieve satisfactory scene-level customization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison with WonderJourney [36] and SceneScape [10]. We simply combine multi-concept customization method Break￾A-Scene and 3D views generation framework WonderJourney as the baseline BAS+WJ for a comprehensive comparison. Customization and 3D Views Generation. For …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: 3D representation comparison with WonderJourney [36]. We use the same first view and fixed camera path for evaluation. The generated 3D view sequences are shown in the supplementary material. scene views with great fidelity and novel combination ways of scene concepts,…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Diversity and instruction fidelity of our approach. We use square brackets to denote defined concepts, parentheses to denote new objects, and angle brackets to indicate the relations between concepts. 4.3. Quantitative Comparison Single Image Customization. To quantita…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Qualitative comparison results of the ablation study on the construction loss function. Input Image w/o V1 w/o V3 w/o R Ours [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Qualitative comparison results of the ablation study on the SceneConceptGraph structure. overfitting to the initial scene image layout and construc￾tion without relations causes distorted layouts and chaotic geometric structures. 4.5. Implementation Details In the conc…

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Break-a-scene: Extracting multi- ple concepts from a single image

    Omri Avrahami, Kfir Aberman, Ohad Fried, Daniel Cohen- Or, and Dani Lischinski. Break-a-scene: Extracting multi- ple concepts from a single image. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2023 Conference Papers, pages 1–12, 2023. 3, 5, 6

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Blended latent diffusion

    Omri Avrahami, Ohad Fried, and Dani Lischinski. Blended latent diffusion. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG) , 42 (4):1–11, 2023. 4, 5, 8

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets

    Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Sumith Kulal, Daniel Mendelevitch, Maciej Kilian, Dominik Lorenz, Yam Levi, Zion English, Vikram V oleti, Adam Letts, et al. Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15127, 2023. 3

    arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Video generation models as world simulators, 2024

    Tim Brooks, Bill Peebles, Connor Holmes, Will DePue, Yufei Guo, Li Jing, David Schnurr, Joe Taylor, Troy Luh- man, Eric Luhman, et al. Video generation models as world simulators, 2024. 3

    2024

  5. [5]

    Diffdreamer: Towards consistent unsupervised single-view scene extrapolation with conditional diffusion models

    Shengqu Cai, Eric Ryan Chan, Songyou Peng, Mohamad Shahbazi, Anton Obukhov, Luc Van Gool, and Gordon Wetzstein. Diffdreamer: Towards consistent unsupervised single-view scene extrapolation with conditional diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Con- ference on Computer Vision, pages 2139–2150, 2023. 2

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Emerg- ing properties in self-supervised vision transformers

    Mathilde Caron, Hugo Touvron, Ishan Misra, Herv ´e J´egou, Julien Mairal, Piotr Bojanowski, and Armand Joulin. Emerg- ing properties in self-supervised vision transformers. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on com- puter vision, pages 9650–9660, 2021. 7

    2021

  7. [7]

    Persistent nature: A generative model of un- bounded 3d worlds

    Lucy Chai, Richard Tucker, Zhengqi Li, Phillip Isola, and Noah Snavely. Persistent nature: A generative model of un- bounded 3d worlds. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF con- ference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 20863–20874, 2023. 2

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Videocrafter1: Open diffusion models for high-quality video generation

    Haoxin Chen, Menghan Xia, Yingqing He, Yong Zhang, Xiaodong Cun, Shaoshu Yang, Jinbo Xing, Yaofang Liu, Qifeng Chen, Xintao Wang, et al. Videocrafter1: Open diffusion models for high-quality video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.19512, 2023. 3

    arXiv

Show all 39 references
  1. [9]

    Luciddreamer: Domain-free gen- eration of 3d gaussian splatting scenes

    Jaeyoung Chung, Suyoung Lee, Hyeongjin Nam, Jaerin Lee, and Kyoung Mu Lee. Luciddreamer: Domain-free gen- eration of 3d gaussian splatting scenes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.13384, 2023. 4

    2023 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Scenescape: Text-driven consistent scene generation

    Rafail Fridman, Amit Abecasis, Yoni Kasten, and Tali Dekel. Scenescape: Text-driven consistent scene generation. Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024. 2, 4, 6, 7, 8

    2024

  3. [11]

    An image is worth one word: Personalizing text-to- image generation using textual inversion

    Rinon Gal, Yuval Alaluf, Yuval Atzmon, Or Patash- nik, Amit H Bermano, Gal Chechik, and Daniel Cohen- Or. An image is worth one word: Personalizing text-to- image generation using textual inversion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.01618, 2022. 3, 5

    2022 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Svdiff: Compact param- eter space for diffusion fine-tuning

    Ligong Han, Yinxiao Li, Han Zhang, Peyman Milanfar, Dimitris Metaxas, and Feng Yang. Svdiff: Compact param- eter space for diffusion fine-tuning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 7323–7334, 2023. 3

    2023

  5. [13]

    Denoising dif- fusion probabilistic models

    Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising dif- fusion probabilistic models. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020. 2, 3

    2020

  6. [14]

    Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models

    Edward J Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen- Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.09685, 2021. 3

    2021 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Peekaboo: Interactive video generation via masked- diffusion

    Yash Jain, Anshul Nasery, Vibhav Vineet, and Harkirat Behl. Peekaboo: Interactive video generation via masked- diffusion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 8079– 8088, 2024. 3

    2024

  8. [16]

    Infinite images: Creating and ex- ploring a large photorealistic virtual space

    Biliana Kaneva, Josef Sivic, Antonio Torralba, Shai Avidan, and William T Freeman. Infinite images: Creating and ex- ploring a large photorealistic virtual space. Proceedings of the IEEE, 98(8):1391–1407, 2010. 2

    2010

  9. [17]

    3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering

    Bernhard Kerbl, Georgios Kopanas, Thomas Leimk ¨uhler, and George Drettakis. 3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering. ACM Trans. Graph., 42(4):139–1,

  10. [18]

    Segment any- thing

    Alexander Kirillov, Eric Mintun, Nikhila Ravi, Hanzi Mao, Chloe Rolland, Laura Gustafson, Tete Xiao, Spencer White- head, Alexander C Berg, Wan-Yen Lo, et al. Segment any- thing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international confer- ence on computer vision, pages 4015–4026, 2023. 8

    2023

  11. [19]

    Multi-concept customization of text-to-image diffusion

    Nupur Kumari, Bingliang Zhang, Richard Zhang, Eli Shechtman, and Jun-Yan Zhu. Multi-concept customization of text-to-image diffusion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 1931–1941, 2023. 3, 6

    1931

  12. [20]

    Infinitenature-zero: Learning perpetual view generation of natural scenes from single images

    Zhengqi Li, Qianqian Wang, Noah Snavely, and Angjoo Kanazawa. Infinitenature-zero: Learning perpetual view generation of natural scenes from single images. In Eu- ropean Conference on Computer Vision , pages 515–534. Springer, 2022. 2

    2022

  13. [21]

    Infinite na- ture: Perpetual view generation of natural scenes from a sin- gle image

    Andrew Liu, Richard Tucker, Varun Jampani, Ameesh Makadia, Noah Snavely, and Angjoo Kanazawa. Infinite na- ture: Perpetual view generation of natural scenes from a sin- gle image. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 14458–14467, 2021. 2

    2021

  14. [22]

    Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion mod- els for high-resolution image synthesis

    Dustin Podell, Zion English, Kyle Lacey, Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Jonas M ¨uller, Joe Penna, and Robin Rombach. Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion mod- els for high-resolution image synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01952, 2023. 2, 3

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervi- sion

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervi- sion. In International conference on machine learning, ...

    2021

  16. [24]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Bj ¨orn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10684–10695, 2022. 2, 3, 8

    2022

  17. [25]

    Dreambooth: Fine tuning text-to-image diffusion models for subject-driven generation

    Nataniel Ruiz, Yuanzhen Li, Varun Jampani, Yael Pritch, Michael Rubinstein, and Kfir Aberman. Dreambooth: Fine tuning text-to-image diffusion models for subject-driven generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 2250...

    2023

  18. [26]

    Low-rank adaptation for fast text-to- image diffusion fine-tuning

    Simo Ryu. Low-rank adaptation for fast text-to- image diffusion fine-tuning. 2022. URL https://github. com/cloneofsimo/lora. 3

    2022

  19. [27]

    Instant- booth: Personalized text-to-image generation without test- time finetuning

    Jing Shi, Wei Xiong, Zhe Lin, and Hyun Joon Jung. Instant- booth: Personalized text-to-image generation without test- time finetuning. In CVPR, pages 8543–8552, 2024. 3, 6

    2024

  20. [28]

    p+: Extended textual conditioning in text-to- image generation

    Andrey V oynov, Qinghao Chu, Daniel Cohen-Or, and Kfir Aberman. p+: Extended textual conditioning in text-to- image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.09522, 2023. 3

    2023 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Customizing 360-degree panoramas through text-to-image diffusion models

    Hai Wang, Xiaoyu Xiang, Yuchen Fan, and Jing-Hao Xue. Customizing 360-degree panoramas through text-to-image diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Win- ter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision , pages 4933–4943, 2024. 2

    2024

  22. [30]

    Motionctrl: A unified and flexible motion controller for video generation

    Zhouxia Wang, Ziyang Yuan, Xintao Wang, Yaowei Li, Tianshui Chen, Menghan Xia, Ping Luo, and Ying Shan. Motionctrl: A unified and flexible motion controller for video generation. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2024 Conference Pa- pers, pages 1–11, 2024. 3

    2024

  23. [31]

    Elite: Encoding visual con- cepts into textual embeddings for customized text-to-image generation

    Yuxiang Wei, Yabo Zhang, Zhilong Ji, Jinfeng Bai, Lei Zhang, and Wangmeng Zuo. Elite: Encoding visual con- cepts into textual embeddings for customized text-to-image generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 15943–15953, 2023. 3

    2023

  24. [32]

    Layer- pano3d: Layered 3d panorama for hyper-immersive scene generation

    Shuai Yang, Jing Tan, Mengchen Zhang, Tong Wu, Yixuan Li, Gordon Wetzstein, Ziwei Liu, and Dahua Lin. Layer- pano3d: Layered 3d panorama for hyper-immersive scene generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.13252, 2024. 2

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Space-time diffusion features for zero-shot text-driven motion transfer

    Danah Yatim, Rafail Fridman, Omer Bar-Tal, Yoni Kasten, and Tali Dekel. Space-time diffusion features for zero-shot text-driven motion transfer. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 8466–8476, 2024. 3

    2024

  26. [34]

    Ip- adapter: Text compatible image prompt adapter for text-to- image diffusion models

    Hu Ye, Jun Zhang, Sibo Liu, Xiao Han, and Wei Yang. Ip- adapter: Text compatible image prompt adapter for text-to- image diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06721,

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    Wonderworld: Interactive 3d scene generation from a single image

    Hong-Xing Yu, Haoyi Duan, Charles Herrmann, William T Freeman, and Jiajun Wu. Wonderworld: Interactive 3d scene generation from a single image. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09394, 2024. 4

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Wonderjourney: Going from anywhere to everywhere

    Hong-Xing Yu, Haoyi Duan, Junhwa Hur, Kyle Sargent, Michael Rubinstein, William T Freeman, Forrester Cole, De- qing Sun, Noah Snavely, Jiajun Wu, et al. Wonderjourney: Going from anywhere to everywhere. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern R...

    2024

  29. [37]

    Taming stable diffusion for text to 360 panorama image generation

    Cheng Zhang, Qianyi Wu, Camilo Cruz Gambardella, Xi- aoshui Huang, Dinh Phung, Wanli Ouyang, and Jianfei Cai. Taming stable diffusion for text to 360 panorama image generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 6347– 6...

    2024

  30. [38]

    Holodreamer: Holistic 3d panoramic world generation from text descriptions

    Haiyang Zhou, Xinhua Cheng, Wangbo Yu, Yonghong Tian, and Li Yuan. Holodreamer: Holistic 3d panoramic world generation from text descriptions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.15187, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Dreamscene360: Uncon- strained text-to-3d scene generation with panoramic gaus- sian splatting

    Shijie Zhou, Zhiwen Fan, Dejia Xu, Haoran Chang, Pradyumna Chari, Tejas Bharadwaj, Suya You, Zhangyang Wang, and Achuta Kadambi. Dreamscene360: Uncon- strained text-to-3d scene generation with panoramic gaus- sian splatting. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 324...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.