Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 43 references

Algebro-geometric integration of the Boussinesq hierarchy

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that every $(3,3N+1)$ spectral curve with $h_2=0$ yields an exact quasi-periodic Boussinesq solution $w=-3\wp_{1,1}((x,t,0,\dots)^\top+C)$.

desk verdict A genuine new family of explicit finite-gap Boussinesq solutions, but the non-special divisor step is delegated and load-bearing; worth a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.19179 v2 pith:K2QDIZJ5 submitted 2025-07-25 nlin.SI math-phmath.MP

Julia Bernatska , Taras Skrypnyk This is my paper · ORCID
classification nlin.SImath-phmath.MP MSC 14H7037K1035Q5314H42
keywords Boussinesqequationintegrablehierarchyorbitmethodcoadjointorbitsloopalgebrasl(3)trigonalspectralcurvesKleiniansigmafunctionsJacobiinversionproblem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper constructs an integrable Boussinesq hierarchy on coadjoint orbits in the loop algebra of $\mathfrak{sl}(3)$ and proves that its finite-gap systems are solved by $w(x,t)=-3\wp_{1,1}((x,t,0,\dots,0)^\top+C)$, where $\wp_{1,1}$ is a Kleinian multiply periodic function on a trigonal spectral curve. Separation of variables turns the Boussinesq flow into a straight line on the Jacobian variety, and the Jacobi inversion problem is solved uniformly for every genus $3N$. This yields exact quasi-periodic solutions for every $N$, expressed through the same kind of function that solves KdV on hyperelliptic curves. The paper reports these as the first explicit quasi-periodic solutions of the Boussinesq equation with graphical illustrations, while noting that only singular real solutions have been found so far.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the spectral curve $V:\ -w^3+wI_{2N-1}(z)+I_{3N+1}(z)=0$, a $(3,3N+1)$-trigonal curve of genus $g=3N$, together with the Kleinian $\wp$-functions built from its $\sigma$ function. The mechanism is separation of variables: the zeros of the pair of polynomials (41) are the separation variables, their quasi-canonical brackets are proven through the auxiliary pair $(A,B)$, and the Abel map sends their divisor to a linear flow on the Jacobian. Uniformization by the imported Theorem 5 rewrites the polynomial coefficients as expressions in $\wp$-functions, converting the separation system directly into the solution formula. The identity (67), derived from the $\wp$-function identities of the abelian function field, then shows that this function solves the Boussinesq equation.

What would settle it

Take an explicit Lax matrix for $N=1$ whose spectral curve has a double branch point, lying on the discriminant locus, compute the divisor from (41), and check whether $w(x,t)=-3\wp_{1,1}((x,t,0)^\top+C)$ still satisfies $3w_{tt}+4ww_{xx}+4w_x^2+w_{xxxx}=0$; a nonzero residual, or a divisor whose Abel image does not move linearly with $(x,t)$, would falsify the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 6: for the hierarchy built from the rational r-matrix and shift element of Section 3, the divisor of separation variables has Abel image $u=(x,t,0,\dots,0)^\top+C$, and the field $w(x,t)=-3\wp_{1,1}(u+C)$ satisfies the Boussinesq equation $3w_{tt}+4ww_{xx}+4w_x^2+w_{xxxx}=0$. The companion field is $v(x,t)=2\wp_{1,1,1}(u+C)-\tfrac32\wp_{1,2}(u+C)$. The equation itself becomes the dynamical identity (67) for $\wp_{1,1}$ on the Jacobian of any $(3,3N+1)$-curve with $h_2=0$, so each such curve supplies an explicit finite-gap solution.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the divisor of zeros of the separation system (41) is always non-special and that the spectral curve avoids the discriminant locus; on that imported premise the $\wp$-function expressions (61) and the linear flow $u=(x,t,0,\dots)$ in Theorem 6 depend.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every $N$, the hierarchy supplies a $6N$-dimensional integrable Hamiltonian system whose two distinguished flows generate the Boussinesq equation, giving finite-gap solutions at every genus $3N$.
  • The same function $\wp_{1,1}$ that solves KdV on hyperelliptic curves solves Boussinesq on trigonal curves, unifying the algebro-geometric integration of the two equations.
  • The zero-curvature representation with explicit matrices $\nabla h_5$ and $\nabla h_6$ provides a Lax pair for the whole hierarchy, so all flows of the hierarchy can in principle be integrated by the same Jacobi-inversion scheme.
  • If the paper's reality conjectures hold, the solution formula specializes to real-valued quasi-periodic waves on two families of spectral curves, with plots given for all-real and mixed-complex branch point configurations.
  • The paper's conclusion that only singular real solutions have been obtained marks bounded real solutions as the next open target within the same construction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the identity (69) suggests that the case $h_2\neq0$ should also be integrable by the same scheme, with the full canonical Boussinesq equation arising as the dynamical equation for $\wp_{1,1}$ on $(3,3N+1)$-curves without the $h_2=0$ constraint.
  • Because the hierarchy is built from a rational r-matrix with an explicit shift element, the same orbit construction can likely generate higher Boussinesq flows whose spectral curves are other $(n,s)$-curves, with solutions given by the corresponding Kleinian functions.
  • The restriction to singular real solutions may reflect the choice $C=u[K]$; exploring other characteristics or half-period subspaces could produce bounded real solutions, a testable variant of the paper's Conjecture 3.
  • The linearization proof identifies the first two Abel coordinates with $x$ and $t$ directly, so the same divisor-flow computation should extend to the next hierarchy flows, yielding higher-order Boussinesq-type equations solved by the same $\wp$-functions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs the Boussinesq hierarchy from an sl(3) loop-algebra r-matrix by the orbit method, obtains finite-gap Hamiltonian systems on coadjoint orbits, and identifies their spectral curves as (3,3N+1)-curves. Separation of variables is used to reduce the flows to a Jacobi inversion problem, whose solution is expressed through Kleinian ℘-functions. The central result is an explicit quasi-periodic solution w(x,t) = -3℘_{1,1}((x,t,0,...,0)^T + C) of the Boussinesq equation 3w_tt + 4w w_xx + 4w_x^2 + w_xxxx = 0, together with a companion formula for v, and numerical plots for two genus-3 curves.

Significance. If the derivation is correct, the paper gives the first explicit family of quasi-periodic finite-gap solutions of the Boussinesq equation in terms of Kleinian ℘-functions for arbitrary genus 3N, connecting the orbit-method hierarchy to the algebro-geometric uniformization of trigonal curves. The paper also contains useful concrete material: the explicit r-matrix and shift element, the reduction of the h5,h6 flows to Boussinesq in Theorem 2, and the verification that the ℘-identity (67) implies that w = -3℘_{1,1} satisfies (39). The N=1 examples compute period matrices and produce graphical output, which is a valuable check on the formalism. At the same time, the manuscript relies heavily on the authors' previous papers [4,5,6,7] for the decisive separation, non-specialness, Jacobi inversion, and ℘-identity steps; these citations are published and are not circular in themselves, but the present paper does not make the required hypotheses fully explicit.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4, Theorem 3] The claim that the divisor defined by the system (41) is non-special is load-bearing for the entire uniformization argument, but the proof is only delegated: 'A proof is made by the method proposed in [4]'. Theorem 5 of [5], imported in Section 5.3, applies only to a non-special positive divisor of degree 3N, and the coefficient identifications (61) and hence Theorem 6 collapse if the divisor is special for some orbit. The paper should state the precise theorem or proposition in [4] that guarantees non-specialness, verify its hypotheses for the divisor produced by (41), and indicate why the parameter values used in the Section 7 examples lie in the allowed regime; currently no check of non-specialness is supplied for the plotted cases.
  2. [Section 5.3 and Theorem 6 (65)] The formula for v is internally inconsistent. From (61), β_{2;1} = (1/2)(℘_{1,1,1} - ℘_{1,2}) and β_{3;1} = -℘_{1,1}; hence 3β_{2;1} - (3/2)∂_x β_{3;1} = 3℘_{1,1,1} - (3/2)℘_{1,2}. The printed equality in Section 5.3 gives instead (3/2)(℘_{1,1,1} - ℘_{1,2}) + (1/2)∂_x℘_{1,1} = 2℘_{1,1,1} - (3/2)℘_{1,2}, which is what Theorem 6 states. More seriously, the Theorem 6 expression v = 2℘_{1,1,1} - (3/2)℘_{1,2} does not satisfy the first equation of (38), w_t = 2v_x, because w_t = -3℘_{1,1,2} whereas v_x = 2℘_{1,1,1,1} - (3/2)℘_{1,1,2}. The correct companion variable should be derived from w_t = 2v_x, which gives v = -(3/2)℘_{1,2} up to a function of t. This affects only the auxiliary field v and not the w-solution, but the inconsistency must be corrected.
  3. [Section 5.3, equations (60)-(61)] The identification of the separation divisor (41) with the common zero divisor of the uniformizing polynomials (60) is asserted by comparing coefficients, but this identification is exactly the content of Theorem 5 of [5] and requires the divisor to be non-special. The paper does not prove that the particular divisor produced by the separation system (41) satisfies the hypotheses, nor does it discuss what happens when the curve parameters approach the discriminant locus Discr. The assertion 'The obtained equalities are solvable for the dynamic variables' is also not justified; a short argument or an explicit reference to the relevant theorem in [4] or [5] should be supplied.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] There are numerous encoding artifacts from the LaTeX source, such as 'hierarch y', 'Korteweg/emdash.cyrde Vries', '/guillemotleft.cyr', '/greaterorequalslant', and 'hamiltoninans'; these should be cleaned before publication.
  2. [Abstract and Section 7] The abstract uses 'N ∈ \Natural' with an undefined symbol \Natural; this should be written as N ∈ ℕ.
  3. [Section 7.2] In the list of branch points for V2R6C, e8 is listed before e6 and e7; the ordering should be made consistent so that the sheet-joining pattern (70) and the homology basis are unambiguous.
  4. [Section 7 and Figures 1-2] The axes of the plots are not labeled, and the captions do not state the values of the Hamiltonians h5, h6, h9, h12 used; adding this information is important for reproducibility.
  5. [Section 8] The conclusion states that bounded real-valued solutions remain an open problem, and Section 6 only presents conjectures on reality conditions; the abstract's phrase 'exact finite-gap solution' should be qualified to indicate that the obtained solutions may be complex-valued or singular in the real case.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the finite-gap solution follows from independent SoV/Jacobi-inversion theorems, with no fitted constants or self-referential definitions.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained in the required sense: the Boussinesq equation is obtained from the h5 and h6 Hamiltonian flows by explicit Poisson-bracket computations (Eqs. (32)-(39)), and the finite-gap solution is then constructed by separation of variables (Theorems 3-4, Eq. (41)) and Jacobi inversion/uniformization (Theorem 5 from [5], Eqs. (60)-(61)). No parameter is fitted to the solution w = -3 ℘1,1; the constants C in (65) are arbitrary integration constants, not tuned to a data subset. The cited results [4,5,6] are published, parameter-free algebraic-geometric theorems whose assumptions do not include the Boussinesq equation, so their use is independent evidence rather than circularity. The only vulnerability is that the non-special divisor claim of Theorem 3 is delegated to [4], and the discriminant exclusion h ∉ Discr in Section 5.1 does not by itself rule out special separation divisors; this is a correctness or completeness gap, not a reduction of the conclusion to its inputs. The conclusion's open remarks about bounded real solutions further confirm that no hidden fitted output is being presented as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The core solution formula is parameter-free in the ℘-function sense; the spectral curve coefficients act as integration constants, and the nontrivial external input is the Jacobi inversion theorem [5] and the ℘-identities [6]. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • spectral curve coefficients {h3k+2, h3k+3} (N=1 examples h5,h8,h6,h9,h12) = V8R: h5=8, h8=238, h6=-192, h9=-836, h12=680; V2R6C: h5=8, h8=238, h6=-75, h9=-175, h12=680
    These coefficients are integrals of motion fixing the coadjoint orbit and the spectral curve. They parameterize the solution family and are chosen for the examples, not fitted to any target data.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Jacobi inversion theorem for (3,3N+1)-curves [5, Theorem 3] expresses the non-special divisor in terms of ℘-functions via equations (60a)-(60c).
    Invoked in Section 5.3 to identify beta and B coefficients with ℘ derivatives; not proved in this paper.
  • domain assumption The Kleinian ℘-function identities (68), including the Boussinesq identity (67) with h2=0, hold on the Jacobian of (3,3N+1)-curves.
    Used in Remark 3 and in verifying the solution; sourced from [6].
  • domain assumption The divisor defined by the separation system (41) is non-special, and spectral-curve parameters avoid the discriminant locus Discr so the genus is exactly 3N.
    Needed for Theorem 3 and for Theorem 5 to apply; stated in Section 5.1 but not proved here.
  • domain assumption All finite branch points have winding number one.
    Assumed in Section 5.1 before defining differentials and periods; this is the generic case outside Discr.
  • standard math Standard theory of compact Riemann surfaces: Abel map, period matrices, theta functions, and uniformization of the Jacobian variety.
    Throughout Section 5 this is standard background, not proved in the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Algebro-geometric integration of the Boussinesq hierarchy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/K2QDIZJ5

@misc{pith2026250719179,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Algebro-geometric integration of the Boussinesq hierarchy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/K2QDIZJ5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.19179}
}
abstract

We construct an integrable hierarchy of the Boussinesq equation using the Lie-algebraic approach of Holod-Flashka-Newell-Ratiu. We show that finite-gap hamiltonian systems of the hierarchy arise on coadjoint orbits in the loop algebra of $\mathfrak{sl}(3)$, and possess spectral curves from the family of $(3,3N\,{+}\,1)$-curves, $N\,{\in}\, \Natural$. Separation of variables leads to the Jacobi inversion problem on the mentioned curves, which is solved in terms of the corresponding multiply periodic functions. An exact finite-gap solution of the Boussinesq equation is obtained explicitly, and a conjecture on the reality conditions is made. The obtained solutions are computed for several spectral curves, and illustrated graphically.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.19179 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Plots of w(x,t) = −3℘1,1((x,t, 0)t + C) with different values of C, associated with V8R [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Plots of w(x,t) = −3℘1,1((x,t, 0)t + C) with different values of C, associated with V2R6C [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_2.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [4]

    Orbit approach to separation of va riables in sl(3)-related integrable systems, Commun

    Bernatska J., Holod P. Orbit approach to separation of va riables in sl(3)-related integrable systems, Commun. Math. Phys. , 333 (2015), pp. 905-929

    work page 2015

  2. [5]

    Solution of the Jacobi inversi on problem on non-hyperelliptic curves

    Bernatska, J.; Leykin, D. Solution of the Jacobi inversi on problem on non-hyperelliptic curves. Lett. Math. Phys. , 113 (2023) 110

    work page 2023

  3. [1]

    A van J., Talon M., Rational and trigonometric constant n on-antisymmetric R-matrices, Physics Letters B , 241:1 (1990), pp. 77–82

    work page 1990

  4. [2]

    Babelon O., Viallet C-M., Hamiltonian structures and La x equations, Physics Letters B , 237:3-4 (1990), pp. 411–416

    work page 1990

  5. [3]

    Baker H.F., Abelian functions: Abel’s theorem and the al lied theory of theta functions, Cambridge University press, Cambridge, 1897

    work page

  6. [6]

    Bernatska J., Abelian function fields on Jacobian variet ies, Axioms, 14:2 (2025), 90

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Bernatska J., Computation of ℘-functions on plane algebraic curves, Journal of experimental mathematics, arXiv:2407.05632

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    Bernatska J., Reality conditions for the KdV equation an d exact quasi-periodic solutions in finite phase spaces, J. Geom. Phys. 206 (2024), 105322

    work page 2024

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Bernatska J., Reality conditions for the sine-Gordon eq uation and exact quasi-periodic solu- tions in finite phase spaces, arXiv:2501.07862

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    Bernatska J., Exact quasi-periodic solutions to the MK dV equation, arXiv:2507.23469

    arXiv

  3. [11]

    Bogdanov L.V., Zakharov V.E., The Boussinesq equation revisited, Physica D 165, 137–162 (2002)

    2002

  4. [12]

    M., Enolskii V

    Buchstaber V. M., Enolskii V. Z., and Leykin D. V., Hyper elliptic Kleinian functions and applications, preprint ESI 380 (1996), Vienna

    1996

  5. [13]

    M., Enolskii V

    Buchstaber V. M., Enolskii V. Z., Leykin D. V., Multi-di mensional sigma functions, arXiv:1208.0990

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    M., Leikin D

    Buchstaber V. M., Leikin D. V., Addition laws on Jacobia n varieties of plane algebraic curves, Nonlinear dynamics, Collected papers, Tr. Mat. Inst. Stekl ova, 251 (2005), pp. 54–126

    2005

  7. [15]

    Pure Appl

    Deift P., Tomei C., Trubowitz E., Inverse scattering an d the Boussinesq equation, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. , 35:5 (1982), pp. ˙567–628

    1982

  8. [16]

    Dubrovin B., Skrypnyk T., Separation of variables for l inear Lax algebras and classical r- matrices, Journal of Mathematical Physics , 59:9 (2018), 091405

    2018

  9. [17]

    Falkovich G.E., Spector M.D., Turitsyn S.K., Destruct ion of stationary solutions and collapse in the nonlinear string equation, Phys. Lett. A 99 (1983), pp. 271–274

    1983

  10. [18]

    II-III, Physica D , 9:3 (1983), pp

    Flaschka H., Newell A., Ratiu T., Kac–Moody Lie algebra s and soliton equations. II-III, Physica D , 9:3 (1983), pp. 300–323; 324–332

    1983

  11. [19]

    Hirota R., Exact N -soliton solutions of the wave equation of long waves in shal low-water and in nonlinear lattices, J. Math. Phys. 14 (1973), pp. 810–814 ALGEBRO-GEOMETRIC INTEGRATION OF THE BOUSSINESQ HIERARCH Y 19

    1973

  12. [20]

    Holod P.I., Integrable Hamiltonian systems on the orbi ts of the affine Lie groups and a periodic problem for the modified Korteweg-de Vries equatio n, Preprint ITP-82-144, 1982 (in Russian)

    1982

  13. [21]

    Sagdeev, R

    Holod P., Hamiltonian systems on the orbits of affine Lie g roups and finite-band integration of nonlinear equation, in Proceedings of the International W o rkshop on Nonlinear and Turbulent Processes in Physics, ed. Sagdeev, R. Z., Horwood Akad. Pres s, Chur, Switzerland, Vol. 3...

    1984

  14. [22]

    Holod P.I., Hamiltonian systems connected with anisot ropic affine Lie algebras and higher equations of Landau-Lifshitz hierarchy, Dokl. Akad. Nauk Ukrainian SSR , Ser. A:5 (1984), pp. 5–8

    1984

  15. [23]

    Holod P.I., Hidden symmetry of the Landau/emdash.cyrLifshitz equation, hierarchy of higher equations, and the dual equation for an asymmetric chiral field, Theoretical and Mathematical Physics , 70:1 (1987), pp. 18–29

    1987

  16. [24]

    Holod P.I., Finite-gap extension of the hamiltonian sy stem for the Kirchhoff problem in the Steklov integrable case, Preprint ITP-84-87P, 1984 (in Rus sian)

    1984

  17. [25]

    292:5 (1987), pp

    Holod P.I., Two-dimensional extension of the Steklov i ntegrable case of the motion of rigid body in the liquid, DAN of the USSR , Ser. 292:5 (1987), pp. ˙1087–1091

    1987

  18. [26]

    Shkil, M.I., Nikitin, A.G., Boyko, V.M., Vol

    Holod P., Kisilevich A., Kondratyuk S., An orbit struct ure for integrable equations of ho- mogeneous and principal hierarchies, in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference Symmetry in Nonlinear Mathematical Physics , Eds. Shkil, M.I., Nikitin, A.G., Boyko, V.M., Vol. 2...

    1997

  19. [27]

    Holod P., Kisilevich A., Orbit structure of finite-gap s ector of the Toda equation and equations of the KdV(MKdV) type, Journal of Physical Studies , 3:4 (1999), pp. 391–398

    1999

  20. [28]

    V., Construction of exact solutions of the Bo ussinesq equation, Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics , 39:3 (1998) pp

    Kaptsov O. V., Construction of exact solutions of the Bo ussinesq equation, Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics , 39:3 (1998) pp. 389–392,

    1998

  21. [29]

    M., Methods of algebraic geometry in the th eory of non-linear equations, Russian Mathematical Surveys, 32:6 (1977), pp

    Krichever I. M., Methods of algebraic geometry in the th eory of non-linear equations, Russian Mathematical Surveys, 32:6 (1977), pp. 185–213

    1977

  22. [30]

    B., Smirnov A

    Matveev V. B., Smirnov A. O., On the Riemann theta functi on of a trigonal curve and solutions of the Boussinesq and KP equations, Lett. Math. Phys. , 14 (1987), pp. 25–31

    1987

  23. [31]

    P., Boussinesq’s equation on the circle, Phys ica 3D (1981) 1& 2, pp

    McKean H. P., Boussinesq’s equation on the circle, Phys ica 3D (1981) 1& 2, pp. 294–305

    1981

  24. [32]

    D., Zaitsev V., F., Handbook of Nonlinear Pa rtial Differential Equations, Chap- man & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, 2004

    Polyanin A. D., Zaitsev V., F., Handbook of Nonlinear Pa rtial Differential Equations, Chap- man & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, 2004

    2004

  25. [33]

    Sklyanin E., Separation of variables in the classical i ntegrable SL(3) magnetic chain, Com- mun. Math. Phys. , 150:1 (1992), pp. 181–191

    1992

  26. [34]

    Skrypnyk T., Generalized Gaudin systems in magnetic fie ld and non-skew-symmetric r- matrices, J. Phys. A 40:44 (2007), 13337

    2007

  27. [35]

    Infinite-dimensional Lie algebras, classi cal r-matrices, and Lax operators: two approaches, J

    Skrypnyk T. Infinite-dimensional Lie algebras, classi cal r-matrices, and Lax operators: two approaches, J. Math. Phys. 54:10 (2013), 103507

    2013

  28. [36]

    Many-poled r-matrix Lie algebras, Lax oper ators, and integrable systems’, J

    Skrypnyk T. Many-poled r-matrix Lie algebras, Lax oper ators, and integrable systems’, J. Math.Phys., 55 (2014), 083507

    2014

  29. [37]

    Generalized shift elements: construction and applications, Journal of Geometry and Physics , 80 (2014), pp

    Skrypnyk T. Generalized shift elements: construction and applications, Journal of Geometry and Physics , 80 (2014), pp. 71–84

    2014

  30. [38]

    Reductions in soliton hierarchies and spec ial points of classical r-matrices, Jour- nal of Geometry and Physics , 130 (2018), pp

    Skrypnyk T. Reductions in soliton hierarchies and spec ial points of classical r-matrices, Jour- nal of Geometry and Physics , 130 (2018), pp. 260–287

    2018

  31. [39]

    Skrypnyk T, On a class of gl(n)⊗gl(n)-valued classical r-matrices and separation of variables”, Journal of Mathematical Physics , 62:6 (2021), 063508

    2021

  32. [40]

    II: B¨ acklund transformation, Lax pairs, and the Schwarzian derivative, J

    W eiss J., The Painlev´ e property for partial differential equations. II: B¨ acklund transformation, Lax pairs, and the Schwarzian derivative, J. Math. Phys. , 24 (1983), pp. 1405–1413

    1983

  33. [41]

    Shabat, A.B

    Zakharov, V.E. Shabat, A.B. Exact theory of two-dimens ional self-focusing and one- dimensional self-modulation of waves in nonlinear media, Sov. Phys. JETP , 34 (1972), pp. 62– 69

    1972

  34. [42]

    Zakharov V.E., On stochastization of one-dimensional chains of nonlinear oscillations, Sov. Phys. JETP , 38 (1974), pp. 108–110

    1974

  35. [43]

    Zhou RuGuang, The restricted Boussinesq flows, their La x representation and r-matrix, Comm. Theor. Phys. , 33:1 (2000), pp. 75–80. 20 JULIA BERNATSKA AND TARAS SKRYPNYK University of Connecticut, Department of Mathematics, 341 Mansfield Rd, Storrs, CT 06269 Email address : jul...

    2000

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.