Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 54 references

Polaritonic Coupled Cluster Theory for Unpolarized Cavities Exploiting Point Group Symmetry

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Two perpendicular, equally coupled cavity modes preserve the rotational symmetry of an unpolarized Fabry-Pérot cavity, which lets point-group symmetry target individual polaritonic states.

desk verdict Real, modest extension of QED-CC to two-mode unpolarized cavities with a sound symmetry argument; lacks an independent two-mode benchmark but deserves peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.19180 v1 pith:UQFAOWV4 submitted 2025-07-25 quant-ph

Laurenz Monzel , Stella Stopkowicz This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph PACS 42.50.Pq31.15.-p
keywords quantumelectrodynamicscoupledclusterunpolarizedFabry-Pérotcavitypoint-groupsymmetrydirectproductdecompositionpolaritonicexcitedstatesequation-of-motionavoidedcrossingsdipoleself-energy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper extends quantum-electrodynamic coupled cluster theory to molecules inside an unpolarized optical Fabry-Pérot cavity, a common experimental setting. The central move is to describe the cavity field by two modes with perpendicular polarizations and identical frequency and coupling strength, which keeps the Hamiltonian invariant under rotations about the cavity axis. The authors then adapt point-group symmetry, via direct-product decomposition, to the polaritonic coupled cluster equations so that excited states carry irreducible representation labels and can be computed individually. They apply the method to benzene, fluorobenzene, azulene and H$_2$, finding dense avoided-crossing landscapes and polarization-dependent electron density shifts, including removal of density from a carbon-fluorine bond.

What carries the argument

The central object is the two-mode rotation operator $\hat C_\theta = \exp[\theta(\hat\alpha^\dagger\bar{\hat\alpha} - \bar{\hat\alpha}^\dagger\hat\alpha)]$ for the perpendicular mode pair, together with the equal-coupling condition $\lambda_\alpha=\bar\lambda_\alpha$. This operator generates the $\mathrm{C}_\infty$ rotations of the displacement field, and combined with the equal-coupling condition it makes the bilinear term $\hat D\cdot\hat d$ (and hence the full Hamiltonian) rotationally invariant. The second piece of machinery is the direct-product decomposition of the point group applied to the QED-CC equations, which blocks the bilinear coupling integrals and cluster amplitudes by irreducible representation so that the non-linear coupled cluster equations factor into symmetry sectors and the $\hat R$ excitation operator of EOM-CC can be built for a chosen irrep.

What would settle it

Compute the two-mode QED-CC ground-state energy and first polaritonic gap for a small molecule such as H$_2$, then repeat with a larger set of modes at the same frequency and coupling; if the two-mode results shift by more than chemical accuracy, the discrete two-mode representation of the unpolarized cavity fails. A complementary test is to measure the coupling strengths for the two orthogonal polarizations of a real Fabry-Pérot cavity and check whether they are equal, since unequal $\lambda_\epsilon$ and $\lambda_{\bar\epsilon}$ would lift the predicted rotational degeneracy of molecular orientations.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper argues that an unpolarized Fabry-Pérot cavity is faithfully represented, in the dipole approximation, by explicitly including two modes per cavity frequency with perpendicular polarization vectors $\epsilon$ and $\bar\epsilon$ having equal frequency and equal coupling strength $\lambda_\alpha=\bar\lambda_\alpha$. With this choice, the bare cavity Hamiltonian $\hat H_{\rm bare} = \sum_\alpha \omega_\alpha(\hat\alpha^\dagger\hat\alpha + \bar{\hat\alpha}^\dagger\bar{\hat\alpha})$ is invariant under the continuous rotation operator $\hat C_\theta = \exp[\theta \sum_\alpha(\hat\alpha^\dagger\bar{\hat\alpha} - \bar{\hat\alpha}^\dagger\hat\alpha)]$; the displacement field $\hat D$ itself is not invariant, but the bilinear coupling $\hat D\cdot\hat d$ is, so the full polaritonic Hamiltonian retains the $\mathrm{D}_{\infty h}$ symmetry of the bare cavity. Treating the two polarizations in the coupled cluster ansatz (QED-CCSD-12-SD with the $\hat\Gamma_1$ and $\hat\Gamma_2$ photonic operators) and exploiting point-group symmetry through direct-product decomposition reduces the floating-point cost by a factor of $h^2$ (the group order) and, crucially, allows polaritonic excited states to be assigned to irreducible representations and to be targeted individually. The result is a symmetry-exact description of unpolarized cavities, which the paper uses to show that such cavities produce dense avoided-crossing landscapes, allowed crossings between states differing by more than one photon, and electron density shifts roughly twice as large as in a linearly polarized cavity.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that an unpolarized Fabry-Pérot cavity is faithfully captured by two discrete modes with identical frequency and identical coupling strength $\lambda$ to the molecule, with all other cavity modes, mode continua, and mass renormalization effects neglected — an approximation the paper states explicitly and flags as future work.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In an unpolarized cavity, any orientation of an asymmetric molecule rotated about the cavity wave vector $\mathbf k$ is degenerate in energy; for benzene this means the unpolarized cavity stabilizes the orientations with $\mathbf k$ in the molecular plane as an infinite degenerate family, whereas a linearly polarized cavity selects a single orientation.
  • Point-group symmetry turns polaritonic excited states into labeled objects: two states mix (forming upper/lower polaritons) only if the direct product of their electronic and photonic irreducible representations contains the totally symmetric representation, so one can predict which transitions will show Rabi splitting.
  • States of the same irreducible representation can still cross if they differ by more than one photon, because the CCSD-12-SD similarity-transformed Hamiltonian has no two-photon creation with a single electronic de-excitation; this produces allowed crossings that a less truncated treatment (adding $\hat\Gamma_3$ or $\hat S^2_1$) would turn into avoided crossings.
  • For the H$_2$ molecule, the unpolarized cavity is effectively a superposition of two orthogonal linearly polarized cavities, so the excited-state landscape contains degenerate pairs ($\Pi_g$, $\Delta_g$) that carry direct information about the rotational symmetry.
  • The ground-state electron density shifts in an unpolarized cavity are roughly twice as large as in a linearly polarized one at the same coupling strength, because two polarization components contribute to the interaction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the two-mode model is correct, the same point-group logic extends to any number of degenerate mode pairs, so a multi-mode unpolarized cavity could be handled by the same symmetry-blocked machinery; the practical obstacle would then be the choice of relevant frequencies and the growing mass renormalization, which the paper leaves to future work.
  • The basis-independence shown in the appendix (real versus complex polarization vectors related by a unitary transformation) implies that the unpolarized-cavity description contains both linear and circular polarization descriptions as special bases, so computed polaritonic spectra should be invariant under that change—a direct check of the implementation.
  • The truncation-sensitive crossings suggest that predictions about photochemistry in the strong-coupling regime should be tested against calculations that include higher photonic excitations, since the present scheme may artificially allow crossings that a more complete treatment would convert into avoided crossings, changing the dynamical picture.
  • The equal-coupling condition $\lambda_\epsilon=\lambda_{\bar\epsilon}$ is a testable experimental assumption: if a carefully characterized Fabry-Pérot cavity shows different coupling strengths for the two orthogonal polarizations, the rotational symmetry and the resulting degeneracies would be lifted, and the model would need to be relaxed.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper extends polaritonic coupled-cluster theory (QED-CC/EOM-QED-CC) to unpolarized optical cavities by explicitly including two degenerate cavity modes with perpendicular linear polarizations and equal coupling. Sections 2.2 and 2.3 derive the rotational and reflection symmetries of the two-mode Hamiltonian at the operator level and argue that the coupled light-matter system is form-invariant under rotations of the polarization basis. Section 2.6 adapts direct-product point-group decomposition to the photonic indices, giving selection rules and block-structured tensors for the coupled-cluster implementation. Numerical results obtained with the Qcumbre/CFOUR implementation cover ground-state densities of benzene, fluorobenzene, and azulene in linearly polarized versus unpolarized cavities, and excited-state energy scans of H2 in both cavity types, including assignments of polaritonic states by irreducible representation and a discussion of truncation-induced crossings. The paper concludes that unpolarized cavities can be viewed as effectively combining two orthogonal linear polarizations and that point-group symmetry enables targeted excited-state calculations.

Significance. If the model assumption is accepted, the paper delivers a practically useful and internally consistent symmetry framework: the two-mode Hamiltonian in Eqs. (8)-(18) is explicitly rotationally invariant, the direct-product decomposition is a parameter-free algebraic argument that yields concrete selection rules in Eqs. (41)-(44), and the H2 state assignments follow the stated symmetry rules. The comparison with an independent QEDFT calculation for azulene is a welcome external check. Strengths include the explicit operator-level derivation, the use of the eT benchmark for the single-polarization limit, and the substantial numerical tables. The main caveats are that the mapping from a real Fabry-Pérot cavity to the two-mode equal-coupling model is not quantified, and the new two-mode numerical implementation is not benchmarked against any independent method; these limit the strength of the physical conclusions but do not undermine the internal consistency of the symmetry derivation itself.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.2, Eq. (11)] As written, the operator in Eq. (11) does not implement the reflection/C2 transformation whose action is stated in Eq. (12). For n = (1,0) (n1 = 1, n2 = 0), Eq. (11) reduces to exp(iπ N̄/2), which maps ᾱ to -i ᾱ, not to -ᾱ as required by Eq. (12); it also does not square to the identity on odd photon-number states. The correct generator for a reflection across the plane containing n is iπ times the projector onto the perpendicular direction, i.e., iπ[n2^2 α†α + n1^2 ᾱ†ᾱ - n1n2(ᾱ†α + α†ᾱ)], without the factors 1/2 on the diagonal terms. Please correct Eq. (11) and confirm that it satisfies σv^2 = 1, since this is part of the central symmetry derivation.
  2. [§2.1 and §2.4; Eqs. (8), (15), (20)] The central claim that a real unpolarized Fabry-Pérot cavity is faithfully represented by two discrete modes with identical frequency and identical coupling strength is asserted rather than justified. A planar cavity supports a continuum of transverse modes for each longitudinal frequency, and the dipole self-energy in Eq. (6) receives contributions from all of them, with mass renormalization growing as more modes are included (as the authors note in Section 2.1 and defer to future work in Section 4). All symmetry statements and numerical results, including the H2 level structure and the density shifts for benzene and azulene, are therefore properties of the truncated two-mode Hamiltonian. Please provide a quantitative estimate of the neglected-mode and continuum contribution, for example a convergence study in the number of explicitly included modes for a small system or an analytic estimate of the effect on Δρ and polariton splittings, or explicitly restrict the physical claims to the two-mode model.
  3. [§2.7 and Results, Figs. 3-12] The implementation is verified only in the single-polarization limit against the eT program. The new two-mode unpolarized results, including density differences, degeneracies, and avoided crossings, are not checked against any independent implementation. Given that this is the paper's main methodological novelty, please add at least one independent validation for the two-mode case, for example (i) a QED-FCI or QED-CI comparison for H2 with the same two-mode Hamiltonian, or (ii) a numerical test that energies and Δρ are invariant under an arbitrary polarization-basis rotation angle θ in Eq. (9). Such a check would confirm that the reported state assignments and crossings are not artifacts of the implementation.
minor comments (7)
  1. [§3.1, Fig. 3 vs. Table 4] The coupling strength is stated as λ = 0.1 in the caption of Fig. 3, whereas Section 3 and Table 4 use λ = 0.05; please harmonize these values and state explicitly which value was used for each figure.
  2. [Fig. 12 caption] The caption states a cavity frequency of 12.68 eV, while the text and Tables 5-12 use 12.48 eV; please correct the discrepancy.
  3. [Table 5 header] The last two columns are both labelled ϵ∥(B1u); the second one should likely be ϵ∥(B3u) to match the other tables and the symmetry discussion.
  4. [§2.3, Eq. (18)] Please clarify that Cθ in Eq. (9) is a photon-basis rotation and that Eq. (18) is a form-invariance statement: the Hamiltonian is invariant under simultaneous rotation of the polarization vectors, and for the full symmetry operation also of the electronic coordinates. As written, a photon-only Cθ acting on D·d gives D'·d with rotated polarization vectors, not literally D·d.
  5. [§3.3, azulene comparison] The comparison with Flick et al. (Ref. 15) is qualitative because the molecular geometry is said to differ; please state the geometry difference explicitly or provide a quantitative metric (for example the integrated density difference) so that the comparison is more than visual.
  6. [§2.5, Eqs. (25)-(26)] The symmetrization notation around Eqs. (25) and (26) is confusing; please define once whether γαβ, γ̄ᾱβ̄, and γ̄αβ are symmetric in their photonic indices before presenting the unrestricted-sum formula.
  7. [§3, Eq. (46)] The integral in Eq. (46) is written with both limits as ∞; it should be ∫ from -∞ to ∞ over d3r.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the symmetry analysis is self-contained, and the two-mode equal-coupling model is an explicitly stated modeling input rather than a fitted or self-cited prediction.

full rationale

The central derivation, namely the C-infinity rotational invariance of the two-mode cavity Hamiltonian and the resulting point-group selection rules, is carried out by explicit algebra in Section 2.2-2.3 and is not circular. The two-mode equal-frequency, equal-coupling ansatz is introduced as a physical modeling choice, not derived from the results it is later used to explain, and the paper openly flags the neglect of additional modes and mass renormalization as approximations (Sections 2.1, 2.4, and 4). The point-group machinery is standard direct-product group theory applied to a Hamiltonian whose symmetry was established independently. External comparisons and validations exist: the azulene density is compared with independent QEDFT results from Flick et al., and the single-polarization special case is validated against the separate eT program package. Self-citations to the authors' own Qcumbre code and to their earlier diagrammatic paper (Refs. 39, 46-47) are implementation references and are not load-bearing evidence for the main scientific claims. The reported roughly doubled density shift for the unpolarized versus linearly polarized cavity is a direct consequence of coupling two modes with equal lambda, which is an explicit input of the model rather than a concealed fitted parameter. No equation in the paper reduces to a fitted quantity or to a self-citation chain, so the honest finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the dipole approximation, the two-mode equal-coupling model of an unpolarized cavity, standard CC/EOM-CC machinery, and fixed cavity-free geometries. The only hand-chosen numeric inputs are the cavity frequency and coupling strength, neither of which is fitted to data.

free parameters (2)
  • cavity frequency omega = 0.466 Eh (12.68 eV) for H2; 2.41 eV for azulene; 0 to 27 eV scan for benzene
    Chosen experimental input, not fitted to data. The results depend on it because it sets the resonance condition for polariton formation.
  • cavity coupling strength lambda = 0.05 a.u. default; 0.08 a.u. for azulene; 0.1 a.u. for benzene frequency scans
    Chosen to represent strong coupling, not fitted. The central derivation does not depend on its value.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Dipole approximation: cavity wavelength is large compared to molecular dimension, and matter is not close to mirrors.
    Used in Section 2.1 to write the Pauli-Fierz Hamiltonian in length gauge with homogeneous field and to set sigma_h = 1 in Section 2.2.
  • domain assumption Born-Oppenheimer separation between electrons and photons on one side and nuclei on the other.
    Stated in Section 2: the authors separate nuclear motion from the electron-photon wave function in the polaritonic partitioning.
  • ad hoc to paper An unpolarized Fabry-Perot cavity is represented by two discrete modes with equal frequency and equal coupling strength; other modes and mass renormalization are neglected.
    Introduced in Sections 2.2-2.4. This is the central modeling premise; the authors acknowledge neglecting mass renormalization and extra modes in Section 4.
  • ad hoc to paper Real-valued polarization vectors and alignment of one polarization with the molecular dipole moment where present.
    Section 2.6 chooses the orientation; Appendix A shows complex vectors are unitarily equivalent, so this is a basis choice rather than a physical restriction.
  • standard math Standard coupled-cluster and EOM-CC machinery: HF reference determinant, similarity-transformed Hamiltonian, Davidson diagonalization.
    Invoked throughout Section 2.5; implementation details are drawn from Refs. 39 and 41.
  • domain assumption Molecular geometries are taken from cavity-free B3LYP/def2-SVP optimization and are not relaxed in the cavity.
    Section 3, computations paragraph. Geometry relaxation in the cavity could change densities and state ordering.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Polaritonic Coupled Cluster Theory for Unpolarized Cavities Exploiting Point Group Symmetry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UQFAOWV4

@misc{pith2026250719180,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Polaritonic Coupled Cluster Theory for Unpolarized Cavities Exploiting Point Group Symmetry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UQFAOWV4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.19180}
}
abstract

We introduce a generalization of the quantum electrodynamic coupled cluster (QED-CC)wave function ansatz, to describe the strongly coupled light-matter system in an unpolarized optical Fabry-P\'erot cavity. This is achieved by explicitly treating two cavity modes in our calculation with perpendicular polarizations and demonstrate that this ansatz preserves the symmetry of an unpolarized cavity. Furthermore, exploiting point-group symmetry enables the assignment of polaritonic excited states as well as their targeted calculation. Using our implementation, the aromatic species benzene, fluorobenzene and azulene are investigated. We demonstrate that molecules in unpolarized cavities have a complicated excited-state landscapes with a plethora of avoided-crossings. We compare the results for a cavity with a single polarization to those of an unpolarized cavity described by two perpendicular polarization vectors using the excited states of the H$_2$ molecule as an example.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.19180 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Cavity symmetry with and with￾out the dipole approximation, respectively, in a multi-mode vs. single-mode approximation. Polarization vectors are shown bidirectional to resemble the correct symmetry of the system. rewritten as Hˆ bare = N Xcav/2 α ωα(ˆα †αˆ + αˆ¯ †αˆ¯) . (8) To show that the Hamiltonian is rotationally invariant, we introduce the associated operators for a rotation with respect to the principal axis… view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. The principal rotation axis is then re￾duced from C∞ to C2, noting that two orthog￾onal C2 rotations remain. When applying the dipole approximation it is assumed that the wavelength of the EM field is large over the dimension of the molecule and that the matter-system is not close to the boundaries. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Exemplary matrix representation of the bilinear coupling ˜d α pq and ˜d α¯ pq. The polar￾ization ϵ is here equal to the totally symmet￾ric irreducible representation Γα = Γ1 and the electronic indices become block diagonal. The second polarization ¯ϵ is not totally symmetric and the occupation for the electronic indices is on the off-diagonal blocks. is fulfilled and Γph ̸= Γ1. An exemplary repre￾sentation of the bi… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: QED-CC ground-state energy differ￾ence of the benzene monomer with respect to the cavity frequency. Left: various orientations of benzene in a linearly polarized cavity; Right: various orientations of benzene in an unpolar￾ized cavity. A coupling strength of λ = 0.1 wa…
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Correlated one-electron density differ￾ences for benzene in a linearly polarized cavity. Left and right plots are different perspectives on the same density difference. The upper plots show the ϵ vector aligned in the molecular plane and the lower plots show the ϵ-vect…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Correlated one-electron density differ￾ence for a benzene molecule in an unpolarized cavity. Left and right plots are different per￾spectives on the same density difference. Lower plots show the k vector aligned in the molecu￾lar plane and the upper plots show the k-ve…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Correlated one-electron density dif￾ferences for fluorobenzene in two orientations within an unpolarized cavity. 0.08 a.u. and a frequency of ω = 2.41 eV . These parameters are consistent with those used in Ref. 15, except for the molecular geometry, which may differ s…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Exemplary energy landscape for an electronic three level system in presence of a single photonic mode. The irreducible repre￾sentations of the electronic ground state is ΓG and for the two excited states ΓE1 and ΓE2 . The irreducible representation of the photon is Γph…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Low-lying singlet states of H2 in a linearly polarized cavity with the polariza￾tion vector aligned parallel (green) and per￾pendicular (red) with respect to the molecular axis. Only selected states of ungerade parity are shown. The cavity frequency was set to 12.48 eV…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Low-lying singlet states of H2 in a symmetrically polarized cavity with the wave￾vector aligned parallel (left) and perpendicular (right) with respect to the molecular axis. Only selected states of ungerade parity are shown to focus on the formation of the upper and l…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Upper part: Low-lying singlet states of H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Correlated one-electron density differences for fluorobenzene in two orientations within [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_13.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ebbesen, T. W. Hybrid light--matter states in a molecular and material science perspective. Acc. Chem. Res. 2016, 49, 2403--2412

    2016

  2. [2]

    J.; Moran, J.; Chervy, T.; Zhong, X.; Devaux, E.; Genet, C.; others Ground-state chemical reactivity under vibrational coupling to the vacuum electromagnetic field

    Thomas, A.; George, J.; Shalabney, A.; Dryzhakov, M.; Varma, S. J.; Moran, J.; Chervy, T.; Zhong, X.; Devaux, E.; Genet, C.; others Ground-state chemical reactivity under vibrational coupling to the vacuum electromagnetic field. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 128, 11634--11638

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    F.; Recabal, F.; Herrera, F.; Simpkins, B

    Ahn, W.; Triana, J. F.; Recabal, F.; Herrera, F.; Simpkins, B. S. Modification of ground-state chemical reactivity via light–matter coherence in infrared cavities. Science 2023, 380, 1165--1168

    2023

  4. [4]

    Walther, H.; Varcoe, B. T. H.; Englert, B.-G.; Becker, T. Cavity quantum electrodynamics. Reports on Progress in Physics 2006, 69, 1325

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    A.; Genet, C.; Ebbesen, T

    Schwartz, T.; Hutchison, J. A.; Genet, C.; Ebbesen, T. W. Reversible Switching of Ultrastrong Light-Molecule Coupling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 106, 196405

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    a.; Pupillo, G.; Genet, C.; Ebbesen, T

    Shalabney, A.; George, J.; Hutchison, J. a.; Pupillo, G.; Genet, C.; Ebbesen, T. W. Coherent coupling of molecular resonators with a microcavity mode. Nature communications 2015, 6, 5981

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Understanding polaritonic chemistry from ab initio quantum electrodynamics

    Ruggenthaler, M.; Sidler, D.; Rubio, A. Understanding polaritonic chemistry from ab initio quantum electrodynamics. Chem. Rev. 2023, 123, 11191--11229

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Herrera, F.; Spano, F. C. Cavity-Controlled Chemistry in Molecular Ensembles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 116, 238301

    work page 2016

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    F.; Martínez-Martínez, L

    Ribeiro, R. F.; Martínez-Martínez, L. A.; Du, M.; Campos-Gonzalez-Angulo, J.; Yuen-Zhou, J. Polariton chemistry: controlling molecular dynamics with optical cavities. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 6325--6339

    2018

  2. [10]

    A.; Genet, C.; Jouaiti, A.; Hosseini, M

    Wang, S.; Mika, A.; Hutchison, J. A.; Genet, C.; Jouaiti, A.; Hosseini, M. W.; Ebbesen, T. W. Phase transition of a perovskite strongly coupled to the vacuum field. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 7243--7248

    2014

  3. [11]

    S.; Ronca, E.; Kj nstad, E

    Haugland, T. S.; Ronca, E.; Kj nstad, E. F.; Rubio, A.; Koch, H. Coupled cluster theory for molecular polaritons: Changing ground and excited states. Phys. Rev. X 2020, 10, 041043

    2020

  4. [12]

    R.; Castagnola, M.; Koch, H

    El Moutaoukal, Y.; Riso, R. R.; Castagnola, M.; Koch, H. Toward Polaritonic Molecular Orbitals for Large Molecular Systems. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2024, 20, 8911--8920, PMID: 39348190

    2024

  5. [13]

    V.; Rubio, A

    Ruggenthaler, M.; Flick, J.; Pellegrini, C.; Appel, H.; Tokatly, I. V.; Rubio, A. Quantum-electrodynamical density-functional theory: Bridging quantum optics and electronic-structure theory. Phys. Rev. A 2014, 90, 012508

    2014

  6. [14]

    Atoms and molecules in cavities, from weak to strong coupling in quantum-electrodynamics (QED) chemistry

    Flick, J.; Ruggenthaler, M.; Appel, H.; Rubio, A. Atoms and molecules in cavities, from weak to strong coupling in quantum-electrodynamics (QED) chemistry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2017, 114, 3026--3034

    2017

  7. [15]

    Ab Initio Optimized Effective Potentials for Real Molecules in Optical Cavities: Photon Contributions to the Molecular Ground State

    Flick, J.; Schäfer, C.; Ruggenthaler, M.; Appel, H.; Rubio, A. Ab Initio Optimized Effective Potentials for Real Molecules in Optical Cavities: Photon Contributions to the Molecular Ground State. ACS Photonics 2018, 5, 992--1005, PMID: 29594185

    2018

  8. [16]

    J.; Rubio, A.; Manby, F

    Mordovina, U.; Bungey, C.; Appel, H.; Knowles, P. J.; Rubio, A.; Manby, F. R. Polaritonic coupled-cluster theory. Phys. Rev. Res. 2020, 2, 023262

    2020

  9. [17]

    S.; Schäfer, C.; Ronca, E.; Rubio, A.; Koch, H

    Haugland, T. S.; Schäfer, C.; Ronca, E.; Rubio, A.; Koch, H. Intermolecular interactions in optical cavities: An ab initio QED study . The Journal of Chemical Physics 2021, 154, 094113

    2021

  10. [18]

    Perturbation theoretical approaches to strong light--matter coupling in ground and excited electronic states for the description of molecular polaritons

    Bauer, M.; Dreuw, A. Perturbation theoretical approaches to strong light--matter coupling in ground and excited electronic states for the description of molecular polaritons. J. Chem. Phys. 2023, 158

    2023

  11. [19]

    E.; Riso, R

    Moutaoukal, Y. E.; Riso, R. R.; Castagnola, M.; Ronca, E.; Koch, H. Strong coupling M ller-Plesset perturbation theory. 2025; https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.08051

    2025 arXiv

  12. [20]

    P.; Panyala, A.; Mutlu, E.; Govind, N.; Foley, J

    Vu, N.; Mejia-Rodriguez, D.; Bauman, N. P.; Panyala, A.; Mutlu, E.; Govind, N.; Foley, J. J. I. Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics Complete Active Space Configuration Interaction Theory. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2024, 20, 1214--1227

    2024

  13. [21]

    Polaritonic Unitary Coupled Cluster for Quantum Computations

    Pavošević, F.; Flick, J. Polaritonic Unitary Coupled Cluster for Quantum Computations. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2021, 12, 9100--9107

    2021

  14. [22]

    P.; Panyala, A.; Kowalski, K

    Pathak, H.; Bauman, N. P.; Panyala, A.; Kowalski, K. Quantum Electrodynamics Coupled-Cluster Theory: Exploring Photon-Induced Electron Correlations. 2024; https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.06858

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Strong light–matter interactions: a new direction within chemistry

    Hertzog, M.; Wang, M.; Mony, J.; Börjesson, K. Strong light–matter interactions: a new direction within chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 937--961

    2019

  16. [24]

    From a quantum-electrodynamical light--matter description to novel spectroscopies

    Ruggenthaler, M.; Tancogne-Dejean, N.; Flick, J.; Appel, H.; Rubio, A. From a quantum-electrodynamical light--matter description to novel spectroscopies. Nature Reviews Chemistry 2018, 2, 1--16

    2018

  17. [25]

    R.; Grazioli, L.; Ronca, E.; Giovannini, T.; Koch, H

    Riso, R. R.; Grazioli, L.; Ronca, E.; Giovannini, T.; Koch, H. Strong coupling in chiral cavities: nonperturbative framework for enantiomer discrimination. Phys. Rev. X 2023, 13, 031002

    2023

  18. [26]

    T.; Angelico, S.; Kjønstad, E

    Lexander, M. T.; Angelico, S.; Kjønstad, E. F.; Koch, H. Analytical Evaluation of Ground State Gradients in Quantum Electrodynamics Coupled Cluster Theory. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2024, 20, 8876--8885, PMID: 39392767

    2024

  19. [27]

    Physics and Device Applications of Optical Microcavities

    Yokoyama, H. Physics and Device Applications of Optical Microcavities. Science 1992, 256, 66--70

    1992

  20. [28]

    Resolution of gauge ambiguities in ultrastrong-coupling cavity quantum electrodynamics

    Di Stefano, O.; Settineri, A.; Macr \` , V.; Garziano, L.; Stassi, R.; Savasta, S.; Nori, F. Resolution of gauge ambiguities in ultrastrong-coupling cavity quantum electrodynamics. Nature Physics 2019, 15, 803--808

    2019

  21. [29]

    M.; Ruggenthaler, M.; Rubio, A

    Rokaj, V.; Welakuh, D. M.; Ruggenthaler, M.; Rubio, A. Light–matter interaction in the long-wavelength limit: no ground-state without dipole self-energy. 2018, 51, 034005

    2018

  22. [30]

    F.; Gauss, J.; Watts, J

    Stanton, J. F.; Gauss, J.; Watts, J. D.; Bartlett, R. J. A direct product decomposition approach for symmetry exploitation in many‐body methods. I. Energy calculations . J. Chem. Phys 1991, 94, 4334--4345

    1991

  23. [31]

    D.; Schaefer III, H

    Crawford, T. D.; Schaefer III, H. F. An introduction to coupled cluster theory for computational chemists. Reviews in computational chemistry 2007, 14, 33--136

    2007

  24. [32]

    Shavitt, I.; Bartlett, R. J. Many-body methods in chemistry and physics: MBPT and coupled-cluster theory; Cambridge university press, 2009

    2009

  25. [33]

    J.; Hofierka, J.; Cederbaum, L

    Fábri, C.; Halász, G. J.; Hofierka, J.; Cederbaum, L. S.; Vibók, a. Impact of Dipole Self-Energy on Cavity-Induced Nonadiabatic Dynamics. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2025, 21, 575--589, PMID: 39772522

    2025

  26. [34]

    K.; Ruggenthaler, M.; Hübener, H.; Schäfer, C.; Eckstein, M.; Rubio, A.; Latini, S

    Svendsen, M. K.; Ruggenthaler, M.; Hübener, H.; Schäfer, C.; Eckstein, M.; Rubio, A.; Latini, S. Effective Equilibrium Theory of Quantum Light-Matter Interaction in Cavities: Extended Systems and the Long Wavelength Approximation. 2025; https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.17374

    2025 arXiv

  27. [35]

    M.; Rokaj, V.; Ruggenthaler, M.; Rubio, A

    Welakuh, D. M.; Rokaj, V.; Ruggenthaler, M.; Rubio, A. Nonperturbative mass renormalization effects in nonrelativistic quantum electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. Res. 2025, 7, 013093

    2025

  28. [36]

    Bishop, D. M. Group theory and chemistry; Courier Corporation, 1993

    1993

  29. [37]

    Molecular electronic-structure theory; John Wiley & Sons, 2013

    Helgaker, T.; Jorgensen, P.; Olsen, J. Molecular electronic-structure theory; John Wiley & Sons, 2013

    2013

  30. [38]

    Diagrams in Polaritonic Coupled Cluster Theory

    Monzel, L.; Stopkowicz, S. Diagrams in Polaritonic Coupled Cluster Theory. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2024, 128, 9572--9586, PMID: 39442089

    2024

  31. [39]

    R.; Barlini, A.; Ronca, E.; Koch, H

    Castagnola, M.; Riso, R. R.; Barlini, A.; Ronca, E.; Koch, H. Polaritonic response theory for exact and approximate wave functions. WIREs Computational Molecular Science 2024, 14, e1684

    2024

  32. [40]

    F.; Bartlett, R

    Stanton, J. F.; Bartlett, R. J. The equation of motion coupled‐cluster method. A systematic biorthogonal approach to molecular excitation energies, transition probabilities, and excited state properties. The Journal of Chemical Physics 1993, 98, 7029--7039

    1993

  33. [41]

    Davidson, E. R. The iterative calculation of a few of the lowest eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors of large real-symmetric matrices. Journal of Computational Physics 1975, 17, 87--94

    1975

  34. [42]

    F.; Bartlett, R

    Gauss, J.; Stanton, J. F.; Bartlett, R. J. Coupled‐cluster open‐shell analytic gradients: Implementation of the direct product decomposition approach in energy gradient calculations. The Journal of Chemical Physics 1991, 95, 2623--2638

    1991

  35. [43]

    CFOUR, coupled-cluster techniques for computational chemistry, a quantum-chemical program package,

    J. F. Stanton, J. Gauss, L. Cheng, M. E. Harding, D. A. Matthews, and P. G. Szalay, “CFOUR, coupled-cluster techniques for computational chemistry, a quantum-chemical program package,” with contributions from A. Asthana, A. A. Auer, R. J. Bartlett, U. Benedikt, C. Berger, D. E...

  36. [44]

    A.; Cheng, L.; Harding, M

    Matthews, D. A.; Cheng, L.; Harding, M. E.; Lipparini, F.; Stopkowicz, S.; Jagau, T.-C.; Szalay, P. G.; Gauss, J.; Stanton, J. F. Coupled-cluster techniques for computational chemistry: The CFOUR program package. J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 152

    2020

  37. [45]

    QCUMBRE, Quantum Chemical Utility enabling Magnetic-field dependent investigations Benefitting from Rigorous Electron-correlation treatment. F. Hampe, S. Stopkowicz, N. Groß, M.-P. Kitsaras, L. Grazioli, S. Blaschke, L. Monzel, Ü. P. Yergün, www.qcumbre.org

  38. [46]

    Equation-of-motion coupled-cluster methods for atoms and molecules in strong magnetic fields

    Hampe, F.; Stopkowicz, S. Equation-of-motion coupled-cluster methods for atoms and molecules in strong magnetic fields. J. Chem. Phys. 2017, 146

    2017

  39. [47]

    Folkestad, S. D. et al. eT 1.0: An open source electronic structure program with emphasis on coupled cluster and multilevel methods. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2020, 152, 184103

    2020

  40. [48]

    Dunning Jr, T. H. Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. I. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90, 1007--1023

    1989

  41. [49]

    The ORCA program system

    Neese, F. The ORCA program system. WIREs Computational Molecular Science 2012, 2, 73--78

    2012

  42. [50]

    Cavity-mediated hybridization of several molecules in the strong coupling regime

    Nobakht, J.; Pscherer, A.; Renger, J.; Götzinger, S.; Sandoghdar, V. Cavity-mediated hybridization of several molecules in the strong coupling regime. 2024; https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.00414

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Theory of Magnetic Properties in Quantum Electrodynamics Environments: Application to Molecular Aromaticity

    Barlini, A.; Bianchi, A.; Ronca, E.; Koch, H. Theory of Magnetic Properties in Quantum Electrodynamics Environments: Application to Molecular Aromaticity. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2024, 20, 7841--7854, PMID: 39255400

    2024

  44. [52]

    Greiner, J.; Gauss, J.; Eriksen, J. J. Exploiting Non-Abelian Point-Group Symmetry to Estimate the Exact Ground-State Correlation Energy of Benzene in a Polarized Split-Valence Triple-Zeta Basis Set. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2024, 15, 9881--9887, PMID: 39302884

    2024

  45. [53]

    Can coupled-cluster theory treat conical intersections? The Journal of Chemical Physics 2007, 127, 044105

    Köhn, A.; Tajti, A. Can coupled-cluster theory treat conical intersections? The Journal of Chemical Physics 2007, 127, 044105

    2007

  46. [54]

    Quantum Cooperativity of Light and Matter

    Csehi, A.; Vib\'ok, A.; Hal\'asz, G. J.; Kowalewski, M. Quantum control with quantum light of molecular nonadiabaticity. Phys. Rev. A 2019, 100, 053421 mcitethebibliography main.tex0000664000000000000000000045503215040657035011242 0ustar rootroot [manuscript=article, layout=tw...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.