Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Jailbreaking Large Language Diffusion Models: Revealing Hidden Safety Flaws in Diffusion-Based Text Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2507.19227 v1 pith:ZVYCU3GO submitted 2025-07-25 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords lldmslanguagemodelsdiffusion-basedgenerationharmfuljailbreakllms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Diffusion Models (LLDMs) exhibit comparable performance to LLMs while offering distinct advantages in inference speed and mathematical reasoning tasks.The precise and rapid generation capabilities of LLDMs amplify concerns of harmful generations, while existing jailbreak methodologies designed for Large Language Models (LLMs) prove limited effectiveness against LLDMs and fail to expose safety vulnerabilities.Successful defense cannot definitively resolve harmful generation concerns, as it remains unclear whether LLDMs possess safety robustness or existing attacks are incompatible with diffusion-based architectures.To address this, we first reveal the vulnerability of LLDMs to jailbreak and demonstrate that attack failure in LLDMs stems from fundamental architectural differences.We present a PArallel Decoding jailbreak (PAD) for diffusion-based language models. PAD introduces Multi-Point Attention Attack, which guides parallel generative processes toward harmful outputs that inspired by affirmative response patterns in LLMs. Experimental evaluations across four LLDMs demonstrate that PAD achieves jailbreak attack success rates by 97%, revealing significant safety vulnerabilities. Furthermore, compared to autoregressive LLMs of the same size, LLDMs increase the harmful generation speed by 2x, significantly highlighting risks of uncontrolled misuse.Through comprehensive analysis, we provide an investigation into LLDM architecture, offering critical insights for the secure deployment of diffusion-based language models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Beyond the Bidirectional Promise: Re-evaluating the Robustness of Diffusion Language Models

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Diffusion language models are not inherently more robust than autoregressive models to natural input noise, but they are consistently overconfident and resist short gradient-based suffix attacks.

  2. Step-Wise Refusal Dynamics in Autoregressive and Diffusion Language Models

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Diffusion language models can revise away harmful intermediate text, and a step-wise internal refusal signal detects jailbreaks cheaply across autoregressive and diffusion models.

Pith tools