The holographic $\textrm{T}\overline{\textrm{T}}$ deformation of the CFT$_2$ with gravitational anomalies

Debarshi Basu; Mingshuai Xu; Qiang Wen

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 112 references

The holographic $\textrm{T}\overline{\textrm{T}}$ deformation of the CFT$_2$ with gravitational anomalies

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Same deformed spectrum survives chiral gravitational anomalies

desk verdict A genuine, mostly solid extension of T\bar{T} holography to anomalous CFTs with cL≠cR, held back by a central typo in Eq. (4.25) and a Section 4.3 derivation that is not as independent as claimed. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.20292 v2 pith:X3ALQOVN submitted 2025-07-27 hep-th

Debarshi Basu , Qiang Wen , Mingshuai Xu This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-th MSC 81T4083C57

keywords TTbardeformationgravitationalanomaliestopologicalmassivegravityholographicentanglemententropyreflectedmixedboundaryconditionsHagedorntemperatureBTZblackhole

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that the $\mathrm{T}\overline{\mathrm{T}}$ deformation of a two-dimensional conformal field theory remains exactly solvable when the theory carries a gravitational anomaly, meaning unequal left and right central charges. The authors construct the deformed black-hole geometry dual to such an anomalous CFT using a mixed boundary condition prescription for topological massive gravity, and derive the deformed energy spectrum. They find the same universal square-root formula $E_\mu=(-1+\sqrt{1+4\mu(E+\mu^2J^2)})/(2\mu)$ that governs parity-symmetric $\mathrm{T}\overline{\mathrm{T}}$ theories, with the anomaly entering through the deformed temperature parameters and the allowed range of the deformation. They also show that first-order corrections to entanglement entropy and reflected entropy computed on the field-theory side match holographic computations with spinning worldlines, and that the holographic entanglement entropy stays real only below an anomaly-dependent Hagedorn bound.

What carries the argument

The machinery has four parts. The mixed boundary condition prescription converts the $\mathrm{T}\overline{\mathrm{T}}$ flow into a field-dependent coordinate transformation that maps the auxiliary rotating BTZ solution into the deformed bulk metric, replacing the finite-cutoff construction that fails for topological massive gravity. A spinning worldline action, consisting of a length term plus a normal-frame twist term carrying the Chern-Simons contribution, computes holographic entanglement entropy and entanglement wedge cross-section in the deformed geometry. Conservation of thermal entropy and of the quantized angular momentum under the flow supplies the parameter map that turns deformed bulk charges into the undeformed spectrum. On the field-theory side, the factorization formula for the expectation value of the $\mathrm{T}\overline{\mathrm{T}}$ operator, valid because translation invariance and stress-tensor conservation survive on a flat background, extends the universal spectrum argument to the anomalous case.

What would settle it

Compute the second-order $O(\mu^2)$ correction to the deformed thermal entropy $S_\mu$ starting from the deformed geometry and the proposed boundary stress tensor; if $S_\mu$ differs from $S_0$ at order $\mu^2$ while $E_\mu$ is kept at its claimed value, the parameter map and the universal spectrum are falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the universal flow equation and deformed spectrum of a $\mathrm{T}\overline{\mathrm{T}}$-deformed CFT$_2$ are unchanged by gravitational anomalies. Setting $c_L\neq c_R$ and taking the bulk dual to be topological massive gravity, the paper uses the mixed boundary condition prescription to obtain a deformed rotating BTZ geometry; requiring thermal entropy and quantized angular momentum to be unchanged under the flow fixes the map between deformed and undeformed charges and yields $E_\mu=(-1+\sqrt{1+4\mu(E+\mu^2J^2)})/(2\mu)$, identical in form to the parity-symmetric case. On the boundary side the authors compute the leading $O(\mu)$ changes to entanglement entropy and reflected entropy from conformal perturbation theory on a twisted cylinder, and on the bulk side they evaluate the same quantities with spinning-particle worldlines in the deformed geometry; the two agree in the high-temperature limit. The paper further claims that the reality of holographic entanglement entropy imposes an anomaly-dependent upper bound on $\mu$, reproducing a generalized Hagedorn temperature, and that the balanced partial entanglement entropy constructed from the non-perturbative holographic entanglement entropy exactly reproduces the entanglement wedge cross-section including the Chern-Simons correction.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the $\mathrm{T}\overline{\mathrm{T}}$ flow preserves the thermal (horizon) entropy and the quantized angular momentum, since the entire parameter map from deformed to undeformed charges and hence the universal spectrum rests on those two conservation statements.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The same deformed energy formula holds for anomalous CFT$_2$, so exact solvability of the $\mathrm{T}\overline{\mathrm{T}}$ flow survives parity violation and unequal left and right central charges.
First-order entanglement and reflected entropy corrections match spinning-worldline holography, so the mixed boundary condition dictionary remains valid when a gravitational Chern-Simons term is present.
The reality condition on holographic entanglement entropy produces a generalized, anomaly-dependent Hagedorn bound on the deformation parameter, and the same bound follows independently from the asymptotic density of states.
The balanced partial entanglement entropy computed non-perturbatively from single-interval holographic entanglement entropy reproduces the entanglement wedge cross-section with its Chern-Simons correction.
In the chiral limits $\lambda=\pm 1$, where one central charge vanishes, the holographic entanglement entropy is independent of the deformation parameter.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural test of this framework is to compute second-order corrections to R\'enyi or reflected entropies on both sides; if the $O(\mu^2)$ terms disagree, the claimed matching is only a leading-order effect rather than evidence of an exact dictionary.
Because the deformed spectrum depends on the anomaly only through the allowed range of $\mu$ and through temperature relations, the flow may not mix left- and right-moving sectors; this could be probed by computing left- and right-temperature-dependent observables separately.
The $\mu$-independence of chiral-limit entanglement entropy suggests that the pure chiral sector is invisible to the $\mathrm{T}\overline{\mathrm{T}}$ flow in these observables; an independent check could come from modular commutator or edge-mode transport calculations.
The anomaly-dependent Hagedorn bound might be interpreted as the radius of convergence of the conformal perturbation series, and a direct comparison with the radius predicted by the square-root singularity in the deformed ground-state energy would test that reading.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Main thing to know: this is a genuine extension of the T\bar{T} holography toolbox to cL≠cR with TMG as the bulk. The deformed spectrum itself is not new—it was anticipated in the literature—but the mixed-boundary-condition construction, the O(μ) entanglement and reflected entropy computations, the BPE-EWCS matching, and the generalized Hagedorn bounds are new. The paper deserves a serious referee.

The core construction is carefully put together. The parameter map (4.23) reduces to the known non-anomalous result in the appropriate limit, and the leading-order matching between conformal perturbation theory and spinning worldlines is reassuring. The chiral limits also come out sensibly. Credit where due: the technical work is real and the paper is honest about much of what it builds on.

The soft spots, in order of severity:

(1) Eq. (4.25) has a typo that matters. As printed, the argument of the square root is 1 + 4μ(E + μ²J²), which does not follow from Eqs. (4.15) and (4.23) and disagrees with the universal formula quoted earlier in Eq. (2.16). The correct expression is 1 + 4μE + 4μ²J². The stress-test note is right. The paper’s own later Eq. (4.29) uses the correct form, so the intended claim survives, but taken literally the abstract’s statement that the universal flow equation remains valid is false at O(μ²) for J≠0. This must be fixed before acceptance.

(2) Section 4.3 is not an independent derivation of the Hagedorn bound. It feeds in the same deformed spectrum and the same modular transformation that already produced Eq. (4.33). It is a consistency check, not independent evidence. Also, Eq. (4.39) does not cleanly follow from the preceding formulas; the saddle-point expression appears to have a sign and factor issue relative to the later Hagedorn beta. I would ask the authors to redo that step carefully and present it as a check rather than an independent derivation.

(3) Minor: the paper should clarify more explicitly which results are new relative to [57], especially for the spectrum.

Overall, the central holographic construction is plausible and the entanglement computations are substantial. With the typo corrected and Section 4.3 cleaned up, this is a solid, citable paper for people working on irrelevant deformations and anomalous holography. I would send it out for peer review.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a holographic framework for the T̄T deformation of two-dimensional CFTs with unequal left and right central charges (gravitational anomalies), using topological massive gravity (TMG) as the bulk dual. The authors construct the deformed BTZ geometry via the mixed boundary condition prescription, derive the deformed energy spectrum, and compute leading-order corrections to entanglement entropy, reflected entropy, and balanced partial entanglement entropy from both boundary conformal perturbation theory and bulk spinning-worldline probes. They also analyze the reality condition for holographic entanglement entropy, extracting a generalized Hagedorn-like bound, and compare it with an asymptotic density-of-states computation.

Significance. If correct, the paper extends the holoographic T̄T dictionary to parity-violating CFTs with c_L ≠ c_R, a regime not covered by the standard finite-cutoff prescription. The explicit mixed-boundary construction and the claimed universal deformed spectrum, together with the O(μ) matching of entanglement and reflected entropy, constitute a substantial contribution to the T̄T deformation literature. The paper also provides concrete non-perturbative holographic expressions for entanglement measures in the deformed anomalous background, and the proposed generalized Hagedorn behavior is a physically interesting prediction. The manuscript is carefully structured and contains many explicit formulas that can be checked; several of the central perturbative matchings appear to work. However, the key displayed spectrum equation and the Hagedorn saddle-point analysis contain errors that must be corrected before the central claims can be accepted.

major comments (4)

[§4.2, Eq. (4.25)] The deformed energy spectrum as printed does not follow from the preceding equations. Substituting the parameter map (4.23) into (4.15) and expanding yields the universal formula with the combination 1 + 4 μ E + 4 μ² J² inside the square root, whereas Eq. (4.25) prints 1 + 4 μ (E + μ² J²), i.e., 1 + 4 μ E + 4 μ³ J². The difference appears at O(μ³) for J ≠ 0 and conflicts with the non-anomalous formula (2.16). Since this equation is the paper's central claim of universality, the authors must correct the typo and verify that subsequent uses of the spectrum (e.g., Eq. (4.29)) are consistent with the corrected expression.
[§4.3, Eq. (4.39)] The saddle-point result β_*² = 2 (E₀ ± √(E₀² - J₀²)) μ + O(1/μE) is not consistent with Eq. (4.30). With E₀ = -(c_L + c_R)/24 < 0 and J₀ = (c_L - c_R)/24, for λ > 1 both choices of the sign give a negative β_*², while the subsequent expression (1 ∓ √(λ²-1)/λ) μ is positive. There is also a clear factor-of-2π discrepancy between this expression and the later Hagedorn inverse temperature β_H in Eq. (4.41). The saddle-point analysis must be redone; as written it invalidates the claimed derivation of the Hagedorn behavior.
[§4.3 and Abstract] The density-of-states derivation in Section 4.3 is not an independent derivation of the Hagedorn behavior. It uses the same deformed spectrum (4.25) and the same modular transformation (4.28) that were already used to obtain the bound (4.33). The abstract's claim that this transition is 'independently reproduced from the asymptotic density of states' is therefore misleading. The authors should either present a genuinely independent argument or explicitly frame this as a consistency check.
[§5.4] The claimed exact non-perturbative matching between the balanced partial entanglement entropy and the entanglement wedge cross-section is stated as 'straightforward to demonstrate' but the balancing computation is not shown. Given that this is one of the advertised non-perturbative results, the authors should provide the explicit algebra (or a detailed derivation outline) showing that the coordinates (5.47) indeed solve the balance conditions and that the BPE reproduces Eq. (5.29).

minor comments (4)

[§4.2, Eq. (4.21)] The denominator in Eq. (4.21) is written as (-1 + 4 μ² κκ̄ L L̄), which conflicts in sign with the horizon-length formulas (4.20). Please check and fix this sign inconsistency.
[§4.3, Eqs. (4.31)-(4.33)] The numerical coefficients in the bounds (4.31)-(4.33) should be rechecked after the spectrum and Hagedorn derivations are corrected; there appear to be discrepancies in powers of 2π when comparing with the reality condition derived from Eq. (4.29).
[§2.2 and §4] The deformation parameter μ is rescaled by 8πG on the gravity side (see §2.2) but this convention is not consistently flagged in §4 and §5. Please add a clear statement of which μ is being used in each section.
[§4.2, Eqs. (4.23)] The notation L_μ, ar{L}_μ for the deformed Bañados parameters can be confused with μ-dependent functions; consider using a different symbol (e.g., L_+, L_- or L_μ^0) for clarity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; lambda and G are theory inputs and mu is the flow parameter. The axioms are standard or domain assumptions inherited from [34,57,58], with the most fragile being the entropy matching used to derive the spectrum.

assumptions (6)

standard math Zamolodchikov factorization <TT> = <T><Tbar> - <Theta>^2 (Eq 4.26) is used to argue the deformed spectrum keeps its universal form.
This is a standard result for translation-invariant theories with conserved stress tensor; the paper argues flat background keeps conservation despite the anomaly.
domain assumption Brown-Henneaux central charges cL = (3/(2G))(1 + 1/lambda), cR = (3/(2G))(1 - 1/lambda) hold in TMG (Eq 2.18).
This is the standard holographic dictionary for TMG, taken from the literature.
domain assumption The boundary metric remains flat under the TTbar flow, so the stress tensor is conserved and the factorization argument applies.
Invoked in Section 4.2 to extend the universal spectrum to anomalous CFTs.
domain assumption Thermal entropy and angular momentum are unchanged by the TTbar flow, used to fix L_mu and Lbar_mu in Eq (4.23).
This is the standard entropy-matching assumption from [34], but it is load-bearing for the holographic spectrum derivation.
domain assumption The spinning worldline action (2.20) from [58] remains valid in the TTbar-deformed geometry.
The paper argues the derivation of the worldline action does not depend on asymptotic boundary conditions, but this is an inherited assumption.
domain assumption The high-temperature limit beta -> 0 with beta_U / beta_V fixed is the regime where rotating BTZ is dual to the field theory.
Used in Section 5.1 to match the holographic entanglement entropy to the perturbative CFT result.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The holographic $\textrm{T}\overline{\textrm{T}}$ deformation of the CFT$_2$ with gravitational anomalies." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/X3ALQOVN

@misc{pith2026250720292,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The holographic $\textrmT\overline\textrmT$ deformation of the CFT$_2$ with gravitational anomalies},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/X3ALQOVN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.20292}
}

abstract

We develop the holographic framework for the $\textrm{T}\overline{\textrm{T}}$ deformation of two-dimensional conformal field theories (CFT$_2$) with gravitational anomalies, characterized by unequal left and right central charges and holographically dual to topological massive gravity (TMG). Utilizing the mixed boundary condition prescription, we construct the deformed BTZ black hole geometry and derive the corresponding deformed energy spectrum, confirming that the universal flow equation remains valid despite the presence of gravitational anomalies. From the boundary perspective, we compute leading-order corrections to entanglement entropy and reflected entropy induced by the $\textrm{T}\overline{\textrm{T}}$ deformation, as well as the balanced partial entanglement entropy non-perturbatively. On the gravity side, these quantities are evaluated using spinning worldlines in the deformed bulk geometry, with results matching their field-theoretic counterparts in the high-temperature limit. We further analyze the reality condition for holographic entanglement entropy, which constrains the deformation parameter and reveals a generalized Hagedorn behavior. This Hagedorn-like transition is also independently reproduced from the asymptotic density of states in the deformed anomalous CFT$_2$, providing additional evidence for its universality.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

112 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

[57]

J. Tian, T. Lai and F. Omidi,Modular transformations of on-shell actions of (root-)TT deformed holographic CFTs, Nucl. Phys. B 1007 (2024) 116675, [2404.16354]

arXiv 2024
[1]

J. D. Brown and M. Henneaux,Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity, Commun. Math. Phys.104 (1986) 207–226

1986
[2]

Strominger,Black hole entropy from near horizon microstates, JHEP 02 (1998) 009, [hep-th/9712251]

A. Strominger,Black hole entropy from near horizon microstates, JHEP 02 (1998) 009, [hep-th/9712251]

arXiv 1998
[3]

J. M. Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Int. J. Theor. Phys.38 (1999) 1113–1133, [hep-th/9711200]

arXiv 1999
[4]

A. B. Zamolodchikov,Expectation value of composite field T anti-T in two-dimensional quantum field theory, hep-th/0401146

arXiv
[5]

F. A. Smirnov and A. B. Zamolodchikov,On space of integrable quantum field theories, Nucl. Phys. B 915 (2017) 363–383, [1608.05499]

arXiv 2017
[6]

Cavaglià, S

A. Cavaglià, S. Negro, I. M. Szécsényi and R. Tateo,T ¯T-deformed 2D Quantum Field Theories, JHEP 10 (2016) 112, [1608.05534]

arXiv 2016
[7]

Cardy,The TT deformation of quantum field theory as random geometry, JHEP 10 (2018) 186, [1801.06895]

J. Cardy,The TT deformation of quantum field theory as random geometry, JHEP 10 (2018) 186, [1801.06895]

arXiv 2018

Show all 112 references

[8]

Dubovsky, V

S. Dubovsky, V. Gorbenko and G. Hernández-Chifflet,TT partition function from topological gravity, JHEP 09 (2018) 158, [1805.07386]. – 40 –

2018 arXiv
[9]

Datta and Y

S. Datta and Y. Jiang,T ¯T deformed partition functions, JHEP 08 (2018) 106, [1806.07426]

2018 arXiv
[10]

Aharony, S

O. Aharony, S. Datta, A. Giveon, Y. Jiang and D. Kutasov,Modular invariance and uniqueness ofT ¯T deformed CFT, JHEP 01 (2019) 086, [1808.02492]

2019 arXiv
[11]

He and H

S. He and H. Shu,Correlation functions, entanglement and chaos in theTT/JT-deformed CFTs, JHEP 02 (2020) 088, [1907.12603]

2020 arXiv
[12]

S. He, Y. Sun and Y.-X. Zhang,TT-flow effects on torus partition functions, JHEP 09 (2021) 061, [2011.02902]

2021 arXiv
[13]

Tian,On-shell action of T¯T-deformed Holographic CFTs, 2306.01258

J. Tian,On-shell action of T¯T-deformed Holographic CFTs, 2306.01258

arXiv
[14]

M. He, J. Hou and Y. Jiang,TT-deformed entanglement entropy for IQFT, JHEP 03 (2024) 056, [2306.07784]

2024 arXiv
[15]

He and Y

M. He and Y. Sun,Holographic entanglement entropy inTT-deformed AdS3, Nucl. Phys. B 990 (2023) 116190, [2301.04435]

2023 arXiv
[16]

He,One-loop partition functions inTT-deformed AdS3, JHEP 05 (2024) 067, [2401.09879]

M. He,One-loop partition functions inTT-deformed AdS3, JHEP 05 (2024) 067, [2401.09879]

2024 arXiv
[17]

McGough, M

L. McGough, M. Mezei and H. Verlinde,Moving the CFT into the bulk withTT, JHEP 04 (2018) 010, [1611.03470]

2018 arXiv
[18]

Kraus, J

P. Kraus, J. Liu and D. Marolf,Cutoff AdS3 versus theTT deformation, JHEP 07 (2018) 027, [1801.02714]

2018 arXiv
[19]

Taylor,T ¯T deformations in general dimensions, Adv

M. Taylor,T ¯T deformations in general dimensions, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.27 (2023) 37–63, [1805.10287]

2023 arXiv
[20]

Kraus, R

P. Kraus, R. Monten and K. Roumpedakis,Refining the cutoff 3d gravity/TT correspondence, JHEP 10 (2022) 094, [2206.00674]

2022 arXiv
[21]

Asrat, A

M. Asrat, A. Giveon, N. Itzhaki and D. Kutasov,Holography Beyond AdS, Nucl. Phys. B 932 (2018) 241–253, [1711.02690]

2018 arXiv
[22]

Shyam,Background independent holographic dual toT ¯T deformed CFT with large central charge in 2 dimensions, JHEP 10 (2017) 108, [1707.08118]

V. Shyam,Background independent holographic dual toT ¯T deformed CFT with large central charge in 2 dimensions, JHEP 10 (2017) 108, [1707.08118]

2017 arXiv
[23]

Cottrell and A

W. Cottrell and A. Hashimoto,Comments onT ¯T double trace deformations and boundary conditions, Phys. Lett. B789 (2019) 251–255, [1801.09708]

2019 arXiv
[24]

Hartman, J

T. Hartman, J. Kruthoff, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini,Holography at finite cutoff with a T 2 deformation, JHEP 03 (2019) 004, [1807.11401]

2019 arXiv
[25]

Shyam,Finite Cutoff AdS5 Holography and the Generalized Gradient Flow, JHEP 12 (2018) 086, [1808.07760]

V. Shyam,Finite Cutoff AdS5 Holography and the Generalized Gradient Flow, JHEP 12 (2018) 086, [1808.07760]

2018 arXiv
[26]

Jafari, A

G. Jafari, A. Naseh and H. Zolfi,Path Integral Optimization forT ¯T Deformation, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 026007, [1909.02357]

2020 arXiv
[27]

Caputa, S

P. Caputa, S. Datta and V. Shyam,Sphere partition functions \& cut-off AdS, JHEP 05 (2019) 112, [1902.10893]

2019 arXiv
[28]

Lewkowycz, J

A. Lewkowycz, J. Liu, E. Silverstein and G. Torroba,TT and EE, with implications for (A)dS subregion encodings, JHEP 04 (2020) 152, [1909.13808]

2020
[29]

Giveon, N

A. Giveon, N. Itzhaki and D. Kutasov,A solvable irrelevant deformation of AdS3/CFT2, JHEP 12 (2017) 155, [1707.05800]. – 41 –

2017 arXiv
[30]

Chang, S

J.-C. Chang, S. He, Y.-X. Liu and L. Zhao,The holographicT ¯T deformation of the entanglement entropy in (A)dS3/CFT2, 2409.08198

arXiv
[31]

Pant and H

S. Pant and H. Parihar,Mixed state entanglement in deformed field theory at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) 086020, [2412.19680]

2025 arXiv
[32]

Basu and S

D. Basu and S. Biswas,Entanglement, TT and rotating black holes, JHEP 03 (2025) 167, [2410.06363]

2025 arXiv
[33]

Faraji Astaneh,Holographic action principle for TT¯-deformation, Phys

A. Faraji Astaneh,Holographic action principle for TT¯-deformation, Phys. Lett. B860 (2025) 139227, [2407.16391]

2025 arXiv
[34]

Guica and R

M. Guica and R. Monten,T ¯T and the mirage of a bulk cutoff, SciPost Phys. 10 (2021) 024, [1906.11251]

2021 arXiv
[35]

Dubovsky, V

S. Dubovsky, V. Gorbenko and M. Mirbabayi,Asymptotic fragility, near AdS2 holography and TT, JHEP 09 (2017) 136, [1706.06604]

2017 arXiv
[36]

Callebaut, J

N. Callebaut, J. Kruthoff and H. Verlinde,TT deformed CFT as a non-critical string, JHEP 04 (2020) 084, [1910.13578]

2020 arXiv
[37]

A. J. Tolley,TT deformations, massive gravity and non-critical strings, JHEP 06 (2020) 050, [1911.06142]

2020 arXiv
[38]

Apolo, P.-X

L. Apolo, P.-X. Hao, W.-X. Lai and W. Song,Glue-on AdS holography forTT-deformed CFTs, JHEP 06 (2023) 117, [2303.04836]

2023 arXiv
[39]

Apolo, P.-X

L. Apolo, P.-X. Hao, W.-X. Lai and W. Song,Extremal surfaces in glue-on AdS/TT holography, JHEP 01 (2024) 054, [2311.04883]

2024 arXiv
[40]

Hirano and M

S. Hirano and M. Shigemori,Random boundary geometry and gravity dual ofTT deformation, JHEP 11 (2020) 108, [2003.06300]

2020 arXiv
[41]

Hirano, T

S. Hirano, T. Nakajima and M. Shigemori,TT Deformation of stress-tensor correlators from random geometry, JHEP 04 (2021) 270, [2012.03972]

2021 arXiv
[42]

Jiang,A pedagogical review on solvable irrelevant deformations of 2D quantum field theory, Commun

Y. Jiang,A pedagogical review on solvable irrelevant deformations of 2D quantum field theory, Commun. Theor. Phys.73 (2021) 057201, [1904.13376]

2021 arXiv
[43]

S. He, Y. Li, H. Ouyang and Y. Sun,TT Deformation: Introduction and Some Recent Advances, 2503.09997

arXiv
[44]

Wen,Theory of the edge states in fractional quantum Hall effects, Int

X.-G. Wen,Theory of the edge states in fractional quantum Hall effects, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 6 (1992) 1711–1762

1992
[45]

Read,Non-Abelian adiabatic statistics and Hall viscosity in quantum Hall states and p(x) + ip(y) paired superfluids, Phys

N. Read,Non-Abelian adiabatic statistics and Hall viscosity in quantum Hall states and p(x) + ip(y) paired superfluids, Phys. Rev. B79 (2009) 045308, [0805.2507]

2009 arXiv
[46]

D. J. Gross, J. A. Harvey, E. J. Martinec and R. Rohm,Heterotic String Theory. 1. The Free Heterotic String, Nucl. Phys. B 256 (1985) 253

1985
[47]

Castro, A

A. Castro, A. Maloney and A. Strominger,Hidden Conformal Symmetry of the Kerr Black Hole, Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 024008, [1004.0996]

2010 arXiv
[48]

Detournay, T

S. Detournay, T. Hartman and D. M. Hofman,Warped Conformal Field Theory, Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 124018, [1210.0539]

2012 arXiv
[49]

Alvarez-Gaume and E

L. Alvarez-Gaume and E. Witten,Gravitational Anomalies, Nucl. Phys. B 234 (1984) 269

1984
[50]

Alvarez-Gaume and P

L. Alvarez-Gaume and P. H. Ginsparg,The Structure of Gauge and Gravitational Anomalies, Annals Phys. 161 (1985) 423. – 42 –

1985
[51]

Kitaev and J

A. Kitaev and J. Preskill,Topological entanglement entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett.96 (2006) 110404, [hep-th/0510092]

2006 arXiv
[52]

Ryu and S.-C

S. Ryu and S.-C. Zhang,Interacting topological phases and modular invariance, Phys. Rev. B 85 (2012) 245132, [1202.4484]

2012 arXiv
[53]

Jensen, R

K. Jensen, R. Loganayagam and A. Yarom,Thermodynamics, gravitational anomalies and cones, JHEP 02 (2013) 088, [1207.5824]

2013 arXiv
[54]

Deser, R

S. Deser, R. Jackiw and S. Templeton,Three-Dimensional Massive Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.48 (1982) 975–978

1982
[55]

W. Li, W. Song and A. Strominger,Chiral Gravity in Three Dimensions, JHEP 04 (2008) 082, [0801.4566]

2008 arXiv
[56]

Jiang, TT-deformed 1d Bose gas, SciPost Phys

Y. Jiang, TT-deformed 1d Bose gas, SciPost Phys. 12 (2022) 191, [2011.00637]

2022 arXiv
[58]

Castro, S

A. Castro, S. Detournay, N. Iqbal and E. Perlmutter,Holographic entanglement entropy and gravitational anomalies, JHEP 07 (2014) 114, [1405.2792]

2014 arXiv
[59]

Jiang,Anomalous Gravitation and its Positivity from Entanglement, JHEP 10 (2019) 283, [1906.04142]

H. Jiang,Anomalous Gravitation and its Positivity from Entanglement, JHEP 10 (2019) 283, [1906.04142]

2019 arXiv
[60]

D. Basu, H. Parihar, V. Raj and G. Sengupta,Entanglement negativity, reflected entropy, and anomalous gravitation, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 086013, [2202.00683]

2022 arXiv
[61]

Wen and H

Q. Wen and H. Zhong,Covariant entanglement wedge cross-section, balanced partial entanglement and gravitational anomalies, SciPost Phys. 13 (2022) 056, [2205.10858]

2022 arXiv
[62]

Q. Wen, M. Xu and H. Zhong,Timelike and gravitational anomalous entanglement from the inner horizon, 2412.21058

arXiv
[63]

Chang, C

C.-K. Chang, C. Ferko and S. Sethi,Holography and irrelevant operators, Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 126021, [2302.03041]

2023 arXiv
[64]

A. Dei, B. Knighton, K. Naderi and S. Sethi,Tensionless AdS3/CFT2 and single traceTT, JHEP 11 (2024) 145, [2408.00823]

2024 arXiv
[65]

Tsolakidis,Massive gravity generalization ofTT deformations, JHEP 09 (2024) 167, [2405.07967]

E. Tsolakidis,Massive gravity generalization ofTT deformations, JHEP 09 (2024) 167, [2405.07967]

2024 arXiv
[66]

Deser, R

S. Deser, R. Jackiw and S. Templeton,Topologically Massive Gauge Theories, Annals Phys. 140 (1982) 372–411

1982
[67]

Banados,Three-dimensional quantum geometry and black holes, AIP Conf

M. Banados,Three-dimensional quantum geometry and black holes, AIP Conf. Proc.484 (1999) 147–169, [hep-th/9901148]

1999 arXiv
[68]

de Haro, S

S. de Haro, S. N. Solodukhin and K. Skenderis,Holographic reconstruction of space-time and renormalization in the AdS / CFT correspondence, Commun. Math. Phys.217 (2001) 595–622, [hep-th/0002230]

2001 arXiv
[69]

Balasubramanian and P

V. Balasubramanian and P. Kraus,A Stress tensor for Anti-de Sitter gravity, Commun. Math. Phys. 208 (1999) 413–428, [hep-th/9902121]

1999 arXiv
[70]

Caputa, V

P. Caputa, V. Jejjala and H. Soltanpanahi,Entanglement entropy of extremal BTZ black holes, Phys. Rev. D89 (2014) 046006, [1309.7852]. – 43 –

2014 arXiv
[71]

Kraus and F

P. Kraus and F. Larsen,Holographic gravitational anomalies, JHEP 01 (2006) 022, [hep-th/0508218]

2006 arXiv
[72]

Hotta, Y

K. Hotta, Y. Hyakutake, T. Kubota and H. Tanida,Brown-Henneaux’s Canonical Approach to Topologically Massive Gravity, JHEP 07 (2008) 066, [0805.2005]

2008 arXiv
[73]

Compere and S

G. Compere and S. Detournay,Semi-classical central charge in topologically massive gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.26 (2009) 012001, [0808.1911]

2009 arXiv
[74]

Takayanagi and K

T. Takayanagi and K. Umemoto,Entanglement of purification through holographic duality, Nature Phys. 14 (2018) 573–577, [1708.09393]

2018 arXiv
[75]

Nguyen, T

P. Nguyen, T. Devakul, M. G. Halbasch, M. P. Zaletel and B. Swingle,Entanglement of purification: from spin chains to holography, JHEP 01 (2018) 098, [1709.07424]

2018 arXiv
[76]

Dutta and T

S. Dutta and T. Faulkner,A canonical purification for the entanglement wedge cross-section, JHEP 03 (2021) 178, [1905.00577]

2021 arXiv
[77]

Wen,Balanced Partial Entanglement and the Entanglement Wedge Cross Section, JHEP 04 (2021) 301, [2103.00415]

Q. Wen,Balanced Partial Entanglement and the Entanglement Wedge Cross Section, JHEP 04 (2021) 301, [2103.00415]

2021 arXiv
[78]

B. M. Terhal, M. Horodecki, D. W. Leung and D. P. DiVincenzo,The entanglement of purification, J. Math. Phys.43 (2002) 4286–4298, [quant-ph/0202044]

2002 arXiv
[79]

B. Chen, L. Chen and P.-X. Hao,Entanglement entropy inTT-deformed CFT, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 086025, [1807.08293]

2018 arXiv
[80]

Asrat,Entropicc–functions inT ¯T,J ¯T,T ¯J deformations, Nucl

M. Asrat,Entropicc–functions inT ¯T,J ¯T,T ¯J deformations, Nucl. Phys. B 960 (2020) 115186, [1911.04618]

2020 arXiv
[81]

Basu, Lavish and B

D. Basu, Lavish and B. Paul,Entanglement negativity in TT¯-deformed CFT2s, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 126026, [2302.11435]

2023
[82]

D. Basu, S. Biswas, A. Dey, B. Paul and G. Sengupta,Odd entanglement entropy in TT¯ deformed CFT2s and holography, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 126013, [2307.04832]

2023 arXiv
[83]

Basu and V

D. Basu and V. Raj,Reflected entropy and timelike entanglement in TT¯-deformed CFT2s, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 046009, [2402.07253]

2024 arXiv
[84]

Jeong, K.-Y

H.-S. Jeong, K.-Y. Kim and M. Nishida,Reflected Entropy and Entanglement Wedge Cross Section with the First Order Correction, JHEP 12 (2019) 170, [1909.02806]

2019 arXiv
[85]

Asrat and J

M. Asrat and J. Kudler-Flam,T ¯T, the entanglement wedge cross section, and the breakdown of the split property, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 045009, [2005.08972]

2020 arXiv
[86]

Calabrese and J

P. Calabrese and J. L. Cardy,Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory, J. Stat. Mech. 0406 (2004) P06002, [hep-th/0405152]

2004 arXiv
[87]

Calabrese and J

P. Calabrese and J. Cardy,Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory, J. Phys. A42 (2009) 504005, [0905.4013]

2009 arXiv
[88]

Jeong, K.-Y

H.-S. Jeong, K.-Y. Kim and M. Nishida,Entanglement and Rényi entropy of multiple intervals inTT-deformed CFT and holography, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 106015, [1906.03894]

2019 arXiv
[89]

A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan and M. T. Walters,Universality of Long-Distance AdS Physics from the CFT Bootstrap, JHEP 08 (2014) 145, [1403.6829]

2014 arXiv
[90]

Sahoo and A

B. Sahoo and A. Sen,BTZ black hole with Chern-Simons and higher derivative terms, JHEP 07 (2006) 008, [hep-th/0601228]. – 44 –

2006 arXiv
[91]

Park,BTZ black hole with gravitational Chern-Simons: Thermodynamics and statistical entropy, Phys

M.-I. Park,BTZ black hole with gravitational Chern-Simons: Thermodynamics and statistical entropy, Phys. Rev. D77 (2008) 026011, [hep-th/0608165]

2008 arXiv
[92]

Tachikawa,Black hole entropy in the presence of Chern-Simons terms, Class

Y. Tachikawa,Black hole entropy in the presence of Chern-Simons terms, Class. Quant. Grav. 24 (2007) 737–744, [hep-th/0611141]

2007 arXiv
[93]

Dubovsky, R

S. Dubovsky, R. Flauger and V. Gorbenko,Solving the Simplest Theory of Quantum Gravity, JHEP 09 (2012) 133, [1205.6805]

2012 arXiv
[94]

Banerjee and P

A. Banerjee and P. Roy,Bounds onTT deformation from entanglement, JHEP 10 (2024) 064, [2404.16946]

2024 arXiv
[95]

H. A. Camargo, P. Nandy, Q. Wen and H. Zhong,Balanced partial entanglement and mixed state correlations, SciPost Phys. 12 (2022) 137, [2201.13362]

2022 arXiv
[96]

Vidal and Y

G. Vidal and Y. Chen,Entanglement contour, J. Stat. Mech.2014 (2014) P10011, [1406.1471]

2014 arXiv
[97]

Wen,Fine structure in holographic entanglement and entanglement contour, Phys

Q. Wen,Fine structure in holographic entanglement and entanglement contour, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 106004, [1803.05552]

2018 arXiv
[98]

Wen,Formulas for Partial Entanglement Entropy, Phys

Q. Wen,Formulas for Partial Entanglement Entropy, Phys. Rev. Res.2 (2020) 023170, [1910.10978]

2020 arXiv
[99]

Han and Q

M. Han and Q. Wen,Entanglement entropy from entanglement contour: higher dimensions, SciPost Phys. Core5 (2022) 020, [1905.05522]

2022 arXiv
[100]

D. Basu, J. Lin, Y. Lu and Q. Wen,Ownerless island and partial entanglement entropy in island phases, SciPost Phys. 15 (2023) 227, [2305.04259]

2023 arXiv
[101]

Skenderis and S

K. Skenderis and S. N. Solodukhin,Quantum effective action from the AdS / CFT correspondence, Phys. Lett. B472 (2000) 316–322, [hep-th/9910023]

2000 arXiv
[102]

Casini, M

H. Casini, M. Huerta and R. C. Myers,Towards a derivation of holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 05 (2011) 036, [1102.0440]

2011 arXiv
[103]

Llabrés,General solutions in Chern-Simons gravity andTT-deformations, JHEP 01 (2021) 039, [1912.13330]

E. Llabrés,General solutions in Chern-Simons gravity andTT-deformations, JHEP 01 (2021) 039, [1912.13330]

2021 arXiv
[104]

He and Y.-h

M. He and Y.-h. Gao,T ¯T/J ¯T-deformed WZW models from Chern-Simons AdS3 gravity with mixed boundary conditions, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 126019, [2012.05726]

2021 arXiv
[105]

W. Z. Chua, T. Hartman and W. W. Weng,Replica manifolds, pole skipping, and the butterfly effect, 2504.08139

arXiv
[106]

Guica,An integrable Lorentz-breaking deformation of two-dimensional CFTs, SciPost Phys

M. Guica,An integrable Lorentz-breaking deformation of two-dimensional CFTs, SciPost Phys. 5 (2018) 048, [1710.08415]

2018 arXiv
[107]

Chakraborty, A

S. Chakraborty, A. Giveon and D. Kutasov,JT deformed CFT2 and string theory, JHEP 10 (2018) 057, [1806.09667]

2018 arXiv
[108]

Bzowski and M

A. Bzowski and M. Guica,The holographic interpretation ofJ ¯T-deformed CFTs, JHEP 01 (2019) 198, [1803.09753]

2019 arXiv
[109]

Guica,On correlation functions inJ ¯T-deformed CFTs, J

M. Guica,On correlation functions inJ ¯T-deformed CFTs, J. Phys. A52 (2019) 184003, [1902.01434]

2019 arXiv
[110]

Kruthoff and O

J. Kruthoff and O. Parrikar,On the flow of states underTT, 2006.03054

2006 arXiv
[111]

Ali Ahmad, A

S. Ali Ahmad, A. Almheiri and S. Lin,TT and the black hole interior, 2503.19854. – 45 –

arXiv
[112]

Casini and M

H. Casini and M. Huerta,On the RG running of the entanglement entropy of a circle, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 125016, [1202.5650]. – 46 –

2012 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [57]

J. Tian, T. Lai and F. Omidi,Modular transformations of on-shell actions of (root-)TT deformed holographic CFTs, Nucl. Phys. B 1007 (2024) 116675, [2404.16354]

arXiv 2024

[2] [1]

J. D. Brown and M. Henneaux,Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity, Commun. Math. Phys.104 (1986) 207–226

1986

[3] [2]

Strominger,Black hole entropy from near horizon microstates, JHEP 02 (1998) 009, [hep-th/9712251]

A. Strominger,Black hole entropy from near horizon microstates, JHEP 02 (1998) 009, [hep-th/9712251]

arXiv 1998

[4] [3]

J. M. Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Int. J. Theor. Phys.38 (1999) 1113–1133, [hep-th/9711200]

arXiv 1999

[5] [4]

A. B. Zamolodchikov,Expectation value of composite field T anti-T in two-dimensional quantum field theory, hep-th/0401146

arXiv

[6] [5]

F. A. Smirnov and A. B. Zamolodchikov,On space of integrable quantum field theories, Nucl. Phys. B 915 (2017) 363–383, [1608.05499]

arXiv 2017

[7] [6]

Cavaglià, S

A. Cavaglià, S. Negro, I. M. Szécsényi and R. Tateo,T ¯T-deformed 2D Quantum Field Theories, JHEP 10 (2016) 112, [1608.05534]

arXiv 2016

[8] [7]

Cardy,The TT deformation of quantum field theory as random geometry, JHEP 10 (2018) 186, [1801.06895]

J. Cardy,The TT deformation of quantum field theory as random geometry, JHEP 10 (2018) 186, [1801.06895]

arXiv 2018