Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 46 references

From Gallery to Wrist: Realistic 3D Bracelet Insertion in Videos

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A hybrid pipeline combines 3D Gaussian Splatting rendering with diffusion-based refinement to insert a bracelet into video with both temporal consistency and realistic lighting, and user studies prefer it over diffusion-only alternatives.

desk verdict A sensible hybrid for bracelet insertion whose temporal-consistency equation, as written, does not actually couple adjacent frames—fixable, but it undercuts the paper's central claim until addressed. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.20331 v2 pith:CNXYVF37 submitted 2025-07-27 cs.CV

Chenjian Gao , Lihe Ding , Rui Han , Zhanpeng Huang , Zibin Wang , Tianfan Xue This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords videoobjectinsertion3DGaussianSplattingdiffusionmodeltemporalconsistencyrelightingintrinsicimagedecompositionvirtualtry-onediting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that inserting a 3D object into a dynamic video can achieve temporal consistency and realistic lighting at the same time, and that the way to get both is to let 3D rendering handle geometry while a 2D diffusion model handles lighting. It demonstrates this on virtual bracelets worn on wrists: a 3D Gaussian Splatting model renders the bracelet consistently across frames, then a shading-driven enhancement network relights it, casts shadows, and refines details in sRGB space. The authors report that a user study strongly prefers this hybrid over diffusion-only video editing baselines on realism, consistency, and fidelity, and that automatic metrics agree. If correct, the result is a practical prescription: use 3D geometry for what it is good at, and use image priors to fix the lighting afterwards.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the shading-driven realism loop built on the intrinsic decomposition $\tilde I_t = A_t \cdot S_t + R_t$. The enhancement networks $f_{br}$, $f_{sh}$, and $f_{sRGB}$ are fine-tuned from Stable Diffusion with a single-step formulation and an enhanced decoder; temporal coherence is enforced by optimizing only the spherical-harmonic color coefficients of the 3DGS model against a Gaussian-weighted window of refined frames. This separates lighting edits from texture edits and lets the 3D model absorb per-frame color refinements without changing geometry.

What would settle it

On synthetic wrist videos where the true shading and light directions are known, run the enhancement stage alone and compare predicted shading to ground truth. If the shading network does not move predictions closer to ground truth than direct sRGB enhancement, or if the decomposition alters the surface color of a bracelet with strong highlights, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a pipeline that decomposes the inserted object's appearance into albedo, shading, and residual reflectance, edits only the shading and the surrounding shadow region with a single-step diffusion model, then re-renders through the 3D Gaussian Splatting model while optimizing spherical-harmonic color coefficients with a Gaussian-weighted multi-frame objective. The paper's key claim is that this is the first approach to combine 3D rendering and 2D diffusion for video object insertion, and that it outperforms diffusion-only baselines on realism, temporal consistency, and fidelity. In the user study, the proposed method receives 81.7% preference for realism, 84.1% for consistency, and 84.1% for fidelity, with the highest automatic scores as well.

Load-bearing premise

The realism gain depends on the pretrained intrinsic-decomposition model separating the rendered bracelet's surface color (albedo) from its shading correctly; if it misassigns highlights or material colors, the relighting and shadow networks spread those errors through every frame.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Diffusion-only video editing baselines tend to lose the inserted object's identity or flicker under pose change; the hybrid approach avoids this by keeping 3D geometry fixed.
  • Editing in the shading domain preserves the bracelet's texture and color better than direct sRGB enhancement, because the albedo is left untouched during relighting.
  • Optimizing only the spherical-harmonic color coefficients of the 3DGS model allows per-frame appearance refinements to be absorbed without changing geometry, yielding smooth transitions.
  • The interactive GUI lets a user place the bracelet, adjust its pose in 3D, and select tracking anchors, so the insertion pipeline supports manual control rather than fully automatic generation.
  • The method ranks first on both user preference and automatic metrics across realism, temporal consistency, and fidelity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the same recipe likely transfers to other objects that can be reconstructed as 3DGS and tracked through a scene, with bracelet-specific training data replaced by object-specific data.
  • Since temporal smoothing edits only the 3DGS color coefficients, one could condition the same machinery on per-frame lighting estimates to relight the object as the scene illumination changes, a variant the paper does not explore.
  • The paper states its scope excludes poor-quality footage with motion blur or severe artifacts; a video-restoration front end would be a natural extension, but the current evidence does not cover that regime.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a pipeline for inserting a 3D bracelet model into real-world videos of wrists, combining 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) rendering with a diffusion-based realism enhancement. The bracelet is tracked using CoTracker and UniDepth, rendered with 3DGS, then refined by a shading-driven enhancement network that separates albedo, shading, and residual, relights the bracelet, generates shadows, and refines the sRGB output. A final temporal smoothing stage optimizes 3DGS colors over a sliding window and interpolates shadows. The method is evaluated through a user study (36 participants, 7 video groups) and automatic metrics (DeQA, Temporal Consistency, CLIP Score) against AnyV2V, ReVideo, and ConsistI2V, and the paper reports that the proposed method is preferred on realism, consistency, and fidelity.

Significance. If the results hold, the hybrid 3D+2D design is a sensible and promising way to obtain both temporal coherence and photorealistic lighting for object insertion, and the shading-driven refinement is a useful architectural idea. The paper includes a user study, ablations, and a newly collected bracelet dataset, which are positive features. However, the temporal smoothing objective as written does not implement the claimed cross-frame coupling, and the evaluation lacks statistical support for the word "significantly preferred." These issues are load-bearing for the paper's main claims, so the manuscript cannot be accepted in its current form.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 3.3 and Supplementary Sec. 8] The temporal smoothing objective is written as G*_t = argmin_G sum_{k=t-W/2}^{t+W/2} w(k-t) * ||R(K, P_k, G) - I_refined_t||^2, with I_refined_t fixed inside the sum. This objective makes the 3DGS model reproduce the single frame t's refined appearance from neighboring poses, but because G*_t is optimized separately for each t and the final output at frame t is I_rerender_t = R(K, P_t, G*_t), nothing couples I_refined_t and I_refined_{t+1}. The claim that "each frame is more influenced by temporally or visually adjacent frames" is therefore not supported by the stated objective. If the intended objective is sum_{k} w(k-t) * ||R(K, P_k, G) - I_refined_k||^2, the equations in both places must be corrected; if the literal objective is used, the temporal smoothing cannot deliver the consistency that is half of the paper's central claim. No code or artifact is released to resolve this ambiguity.
  2. [Sec. 4, Tables 1 and 2] The user study reports only raw percentages (36 participants, 7 video groups) with no confidence intervals, error bars, or significance tests, yet the text states that the method is "significantly preferred." Table 2 reports single scalar averages for DeQA, Temporal Consistency, and CLIP Score with no variance over the 56 insertion cases. To support the superiority claim over the three baselines, the authors should report per-case distributions, confidence intervals, and appropriate significance tests (e.g., paired tests across participants). This is a load-bearing part of the central claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The sentence "Achieving both temporal consistency, or realistic lighting remains difficult" should be reworded to "Achieving both temporal consistency and realistic lighting remains difficult".
  2. [Fig. 2] Figure 2 is very small and the three pipeline stages are hard to read; a larger or decomposed figure would improve clarity.
  3. [Sec. 2.1 and Conclusion] The claim of being the "first approach to synergize 3D rendering and 2D diffusion for video object insertion" should be tempered or justified more carefully, given the related-work discussion of hybrid or object-insertion systems such as VideoAnydoor [35].
  4. [Sec. 4, Table 2] The DeQA metric [42] is co-authored by an author of this paper; please discuss potential bias and, if possible, include an independent quality metric in the evaluation.
  5. [Overall] No code or dataset release is indicated; providing these would strengthen reproducibility, especially given the ambiguity in the Sec. 3.3 formulation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular derivation: realism and consistency are evaluated externally and trained on synthesized pairs; only a peripheral self-citation via DeQA [42].

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. The realism networks f_br, f_sh, and f_sRGB are trained on synthetic degradation pairs (Sec. 3.2.3), where well-lit images are decomposed and their shading is perturbed; the reported realism, consistency, and fidelity results are obtained from a user study and external metrics (DeQA, CLIP, and consecutive-frame CLIP cosine similarity), so they are not refits of the training targets. The 3DGS smoothing stage (Sec. 3.3) optimizes color/SH attributes against the per-frame image I_refined_t; the equation as written keeps the reference fixed while varying P_k, which is a possible under-specification or indexing issue in the claimed temporal coupling, but it is a correctness concern rather than a circular reduction, because the output is not equal to its input by construction and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The only self-citation touching the evaluation is the DeQA metric [42], co-authored by T. Xue; that metric is an external pretrained quality estimator applied to outputs, not a parameter fitted in this paper, so it is a minor self-citation rather than load-bearing circularity. No load-bearing uniqueness theorem, ansatz, or known result is imported from the authors' own prior work. Score 1 reflects only the peripheral self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard deep learning assumptions and several hand-tuned augmentation ranges, all documented in the paper. No new physical entities, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • shading sharpness exponent alpha = sampled from [1.0, 6.0]
    Controls sharpness of synthetic shading maps in relighting augmentation, Sec. 3.2.3.
  • grayscale blend weight beta = uniform [0, 1]
    Blends original grayscale shading with synthetic shading in training, Sec. 3.2.3.
  • intensity scaling factor gamma = uniform [0.5, 1.5]
    Scales shading intensity range in augmentation, Sec. 3.2.3.
  • shadow patch amplitude and scale ranges = ranges [A_min, A_max] and [sigma_min, sigma_max], concrete values not given
    Controls random Gaussian patches added in shadow augmentation, Sec. 3.2.3.
  • temporal window size W and Gaussian weights = not specified in main text
    Sliding window for 3DGS color optimization in temporal smoothing, Sec. 3.3.
  • shading loss weights lambda_1 and lambda_2 = not specified
    Balance L1 and multiscale gradient losses in shading enhancement training, Sec. 3.2.4.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Pretrained intrinsic decomposition model [3] yields valid albedo/shading/residual separation for rendered bracelet images.
    Sec. 3.2.1: the whole shading-driven enhancement operates on S_t and A_t from [3]; if decomposition fails on synthetic renderings, relighting corrupts texture.
  • domain assumption CoTracker and UniDepth provide sufficient 2D tracking and metric depth to recover accurate 3D pose via PnP solving across frames.
    Sec. 3.1 and Supplementary Sec. 6-7; pose error propagates to all rendered frames and occlusion masks.
  • domain assumption Synthesized shading augmentations cover the distribution of real relighting and shadow effects encountered at test time.
    Sec. 3.2.3; the networks only see augmented synthetic pairs during training, so generalization depends on this coverage.
  • domain assumption sRGB-to-linear gamma 2.2 conversion and the linear composition A_t * S_t + R_t sufficiently describe the image formation of the rendered bracelet.
    Sec. 3.2.1; used to separate diffuse and residual components before relighting.
  • domain assumption Single-step diffusion with a zero latent (formulation from [24]) retains Stable Diffusion's image prior while maintaining identity fidelity.
    Sec. 3.2.2; used for all three enhancement networks (f_br, f_sh, f_sRGB).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of From Gallery to Wrist: Realistic 3D Bracelet Insertion in Videos." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CNXYVF37

@misc{pith2026250720331,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: From Gallery to Wrist: Realistic 3D Bracelet Insertion in Videos},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CNXYVF37}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.20331}
}
read the original abstract

Inserting 3D objects into videos is a longstanding challenge in computer graphics with applications in augmented reality, virtual try-on, and video composition. Achieving both temporal consistency, or realistic lighting remains difficult, particularly in dynamic scenarios with complex object motion, perspective changes, and varying illumination. While 2D diffusion models have shown promise for producing photorealistic edits, they often struggle with maintaining temporal coherence across frames. Conversely, traditional 3D rendering methods excel in spatial and temporal consistency but fall short in achieving photorealistic lighting. In this work, we propose a hybrid object insertion pipeline that combines the strengths of both paradigms. Specifically, we focus on inserting bracelets into dynamic wrist scenes, leveraging the high temporal consistency of 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) for initial rendering and refining the results using a 2D diffusion-based enhancement model to ensure realistic lighting interactions. Our method introduces a shading-driven pipeline that separates intrinsic object properties (albedo, shading, reflectance) and refines both shading and sRGB images for photorealism. To maintain temporal coherence, we optimize the 3DGS model with multi-frame weighted adjustments. This is the first approach to synergize 3D rendering and 2D diffusion for video object insertion, offering a robust solution for realistic and consistent video editing. Project Page: https://cjeen.github.io/BraceletPaper/

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.20331 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. We propose a hybrid pipeline for inserting 3D objects into videos, combining 3D Gaussian Splatting rendering for temporal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Method overview. Our pipeline inserts a 3D bracelet into a video while maintaining temporal consistency and realistic lighting. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Interactive GUI. (a) Put Bracelet: Place the bracelet on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Network architecture. We adopt single-step diffusion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Shading maps in data augmentation. (a) Bracelet shad [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Qualitative comparison results. We compare our method against AnyV2V[ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Ablation Study on Shading-Driven Enhancement. We [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Ablation Study on Temporal Smoothing. We compare [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Deep image- based illumination harmonization

    Zhongyun Bao, Chengjiang Long, Gang Fu, Daquan Liu, Yuanzhen Li, Jiaming Wu, and Chunxia Xiao. Deep image- based illumination harmonization. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 18542–18551, 2022. 3

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Cut-and-paste object insertion by enabling deep image prior for reshading

    Anand Bhattad and David A Forsyth. Cut-and-paste object insertion by enabling deep image prior for reshading. In2022 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) , pages 332–

    work page

  3. [3]

    Colorful diffuse intrinsic image decomposition in the wild

    Chris Careaga and Ya ˘gız Aksoy. Colorful diffuse intrinsic image decomposition in the wild. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 43(6):1–12, 2024. 4

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Chris Careaga, S. Mahdi H. Miangoleh, and Ya ˘gız Aksoy. Intrinsic harmonization for illumination-aware compositing. In Proc. SIGGRAPH Asia, 2023. 3, 4

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Anydoor: Zero-shot object-level im- age customization

    Xi Chen, Lianghua Huang, Yu Liu, Yujun Shen, Deli Zhao, and Hengshuang Zhao. Anydoor: Zero-shot object-level im- age customization. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) ,

    work page

  6. [6]

    High-resolution im- age harmonization via collaborative dual transformations

    Wenyan Cong, Xinhao Tao, Li Niu, Jing Liang, Xuesong Gao, Qihao Sun, and Liqing Zhang. High-resolution im- age harmonization via collaborative dual transformations. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vi- sion and Pattern Recognition, pages 18470–18479, 2022. 3

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Tutorial on variational autoencoders

    Carl Doersch. Tutorial on variational autoencoders. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.05908, 2016. 5

    arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    Structure and content-guided video synthesis with diffusion models

    Patrick Esser, Johnathan Chiu, Parmida Atighehchian, Jonathan Granskog, and Anastasis Germanidis. Structure and content-guided video synthesis with diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 7346–7356, 2023. 7, 8

    work page 2023

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography.Communications of the ACM, 24(6):381–395, 1981

    Martin A Fischler and Robert C Bolles. Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography.Communications of the ACM, 24(6):381–395, 1981. 1

    1981

  2. [10]

    Lora-edit: Controllable first-frame- guided video editing via mask-aware lora fine-tuning

    Chenjian Gao, Lihe Ding, Xin Cai, Zhanpeng Huang, Zibin Wang, and Tianfan Xue. Lora-edit: Controllable first-frame- guided video editing via mask-aware lora fine-tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.10082, 2025. 2

    2025

  3. [11]

    Intrinsic image harmonization

    Zonghui Guo, Haiyong Zheng, Yufeng Jiang, Zhaorui Gu, and Bing Zheng. Intrinsic image harmonization. In Pro- ceedings of the ieee/cvf conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 16367–16376, 2021. 3

    2021

  4. [12]

    Transformer for image harmonization and beyond

    Zonghui Guo, Zhaorui Gu, Bing Zheng, Junyu Dong, and Haiyong Zheng. Transformer for image harmonization and beyond. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 45(11):12960–12977, 2022

    2022

  5. [13]

    Neursf: Neural shading field for image harmoniza- tion

    Zhongyun Hu, Ntumba Elie Nsampi, Xue Wang, and Qing Wang. Neursf: Neural shading field for image harmoniza- tion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.01314, 2021. 3

    2021 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Ebsynth: Fast example-based image synthesis and style transfer

    Ondrej Jamriska. Ebsynth: Fast example-based image synthesis and style transfer. https://github.com/ jamriska/ebsynth, 2018. 6, 8

    2018

  7. [15]

    Co- tracker3: Simpler and better point tracking by pseudo- labelling real videos

    Nikita Karaev, Iurii Makarov, Jianyuan Wang, Natalia Neverova, Andrea Vedaldi, and Christian Rupprecht. Co- tracker3: Simpler and better point tracking by pseudo- labelling real videos. In Proc. arXiv:2410.11831, 2024. 3, 1

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Harmonizer: Learning to perform white-box image and video harmonization

    Zhanghan Ke, Chunyi Sun, Lei Zhu, Ke Xu, and Rynson WH Lau. Harmonizer: Learning to perform white-box image and video harmonization. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 690–706. Springer, 2022. 3

    2022

  9. [17]

    3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering

    Bernhard Kerbl, Georgios Kopanas, Thomas Leimk ¨uhler, and George Drettakis. 3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 42 (4), 2023. 2, 1

    2023

  10. [18]

    3d object manipulation in a single photograph using stock 3d models

    Natasha Kholgade, Tomas Simon, Alexei Efros, and Yaser Sheikh. 3d object manipulation in a single photograph using stock 3d models. ACM Transactions on graphics (TOG), 33 (4):1–12, 2014. 2

    2014

  11. [19]

    A method for stochastic optimization

    Diederik Kinga, Jimmy Ba Adam, et al. A method for stochastic optimization. In International conference on learning representations (ICLR) . San Diego, California;,

  12. [20]

    Anyv2v: A plug-and-play framework for any video- to-video editing tasks

    Max Ku, Cong Wei, Weiming Ren, Huan Yang, and Wenhu Chen. Anyv2v: A plug-and-play framework for any video- to-video editing tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.14468 ,

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    Megadepth: Learning single- view depth prediction from internet photos

    Zhengqi Li and Noah Snavely. Megadepth: Learning single- view depth prediction from internet photos. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2041–2050, 2018. 6

    2018

  14. [22]

    An approximate shading model with detail decom- position for object relighting

    Zicheng Liao, Kevin Karsch, Hongyi Zhang, and David Forsyth. An approximate shading model with detail decom- position for object relighting. International Journal of Com- puter Vision, 127:22–37, 2019. 3

    2019

  15. [23]

    Decoupled weight decay regularization

    I Loshchilov. Decoupled weight decay regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101, 2017. 6

    2017 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Fine-tuning image-conditional diffusion models is easier than you think

    Gonzalo Martin Garcia, Karim Abou Zeid, Christian Schmidt, Daan de Geus, Alexander Hermans, and Bastian Leibe. Fine-tuning image-conditional diffusion models is easier than you think. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Win- ter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV),

  17. [25]

    Revideo: Remake a video with motion and content control

    Chong Mou, Mingdeng Cao, Xintao Wang, Zhaoyang Zhang, Ying Shan, and Jian Zhang. Revideo: Remake a video with motion and content control. NeurIPS, 2024. 2, 7

    2024

  18. [26]

    I2vedit: First-frame-guided video editing via image-to- video diffusion models

    Wenqi Ouyang, Yi Dong, Lei Yang, Jianlou Si, and Xingang Pan. I2vedit: First-frame-guided video editing via image-to- video diffusion models. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2024 Confer- ence Papers. Association for Computing Machinery, 2024. 2

    2024

  19. [27]

    UniDepth: 9 Universal monocular metric depth estimation

    Luigi Piccinelli, Yung-Hsu Yang, Christos Sakaridis, Mattia Segu, Siyuan Li, Luc Van Gool, and Fisher Yu. UniDepth: 9 Universal monocular metric depth estimation. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2024. 3, 1

    2024

  20. [28]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervi- sion

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervi- sion. In International conference on machine learning, ...

    2021

  21. [29]

    Unwrap mosaics: a new representation for video editing

    Alex Rav-Acha, Pushmeet Kohli, Carsten Rother, and An- drew Fitzgibbon. Unwrap mosaics: a new representation for video editing. ACM Trans. Graph., 27(3):1–11, 2008. 2

    2008

  22. [30]

    Consisti2v: Enhanc- ing visual consistency for image-to-video generation

    Weiming Ren, Huan Yang, Ge Zhang, Cong Wei, Xinrun Du, Wenhao Huang, and Wenhu Chen. Consisti2v: Enhanc- ing visual consistency for image-to-video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.04324, 2024. 2, 7

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Bj ¨orn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 10684–10695, 2022. 2, 3, 5, 6

    2022

  24. [32]

    U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation

    Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In Proceedings of Medical Image Computing and Computer- Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), 2015. 5

    2015

  25. [33]

    Object- stitch: Object compositing with diffusion model

    Yizhi Song, Zhifei Zhang, Zhe Lin, Scott Cohen, Brian Price, Jianming Zhang, Soo Ye Kim, and Daniel Aliaga. Object- stitch: Object compositing with diffusion model. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 18310–18319, 2023. 2

    2023

  26. [34]

    Imprint: Generative object compositing by learning identity-preserving representation

    Yizhi Song, Zhifei Zhang, Zhe Lin, Scott Cohen, Brian Price, Jianming Zhang, Soo Ye Kim, He Zhang, Wei Xiong, and Daniel Aliaga. Imprint: Generative object compositing by learning identity-preserving representation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision ...

    2024

  27. [35]

    Videoanydoor: High-fidelity video ob- ject insertion with precise motion control, 2025

    Yuanpeng Tu, Hao Luo, Xi Chen, Sihui Ji, Xiang Bai, and Hengshuang Zhao. Videoanydoor: High-fidelity video ob- ject insertion with precise motion control, 2025. 2

    2025

  28. [36]

    Anton van den Hengel, Anthony Dick, Thorsten Thorm¨ahlen, Ben Ward, and Philip H. S. Torr. Video- trace: rapid interactive scene modelling from video. ACM Trans. Graph., 26(3):86–es, 2007. 2

    2007

  29. [37]

    Semi-supervised parametric real-world image harmonization

    Ke Wang, Micha ¨el Gharbi, He Zhang, Zhihao Xia, and Eli Shechtman. Semi-supervised parametric real-world image harmonization. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 5927– 5936, 2023. 3

    2023

  30. [38]

    L-cad: Language-based colorization with any-level descrip- tions using diffusion priors

    Shuchen Weng, Peixuan Zhang, Yu Li, Si Li, Boxin Shi, et al. L-cad: Language-based colorization with any-level descrip- tions using diffusion priors. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024. 5

    2024

  31. [39]

    Objectdrop: Bootstrap- ping counterfactuals for photorealistic object removal and in- sertion

    Daniel Winter, Matan Cohen, Shlomi Fruchter, Yael Pritch, Alex Rav-Acha, and Yedid Hoshen. Objectdrop: Bootstrap- ping counterfactuals for photorealistic object removal and in- sertion. In ECCV, 2024. 2

    2024

  32. [40]

    Paint by example: Exemplar-based image editing with diffusion mod- els

    Binxin Yang, Shuyang Gu, Bo Zhang, Ting Zhang, Xuejin Chen, Xiaoyan Sun, Dong Chen, and Fang Wen. Paint by example: Exemplar-based image editing with diffusion mod- els. In 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 18381–18391, 2023. 2

    2023

  33. [41]

    Rerender a video: Zero-shot text-guided video-to-video translation

    Shuai Yang, Yifan Zhou, Ziwei Liu, and Chen Change Loy. Rerender a video: Zero-shot text-guided video-to-video translation. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2023 Conference Papers , pages 1–11, 2023. 6

    2023

  34. [42]

    Teaching large language models to regress accurate image quality scores using score distribution

    Zhiyuan You, Xin Cai, Jinjin Gu, Tianfan Xue, and Chao Dong. Teaching large language models to regress accurate image quality scores using score distribution. In IEEE Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2025. 7, 8

    2025

  35. [43]

    Controlcom: Controllable image composition using diffusion model

    Bo Zhang, Yuxuan Duan, Jun Lan, Yan Hong, Huijia Zhu, Weiqiang Wang, and Li Niu. Controlcom: Controllable image composition using diffusion model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.10040, 2023. 2 10 From Gallery to Wrist: Realistic 3D Bracelet Insertion in Videos Supplementary Materia...

    2023 arXiv

  36. [44]

    We rely on 2D keypoint tracking result of skin near the bracelet, and use them to calculate 3D bracelet motion

    Bracelet 3D Motion Calculation Given a 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) model G of the bracelet and its initial pose P1 = ( R1, T1) in the first frame, we compute the bracelet’s pose in subsequent frames to align it with the wrist’s motion. We rely on 2D keypoint tracking result o...

  37. [45]

    To align depth across frames, we compute a scale factor st for each framet using the calculated pose Pt: arg min st NX i=1 ∥st· Dt(xi t)− [PtXi 1]z∥2

    Occlusion Handling To ensure a correct depth ordering between human, back- ground, and bracelet, we use monocular depth maps Dt from UniDepth as the 3D context to handle the occlusion. To align depth across frames, we compute a scale factor st for each framet using the calcula...

  38. [46]

    Optimizing 3D Gaussian for Smoothing To achieve smooth temporal transitions while preserving the geometric structure of the bracelet, we optimize only the spherical harmonics (SH) coefficients associated with each splat in the 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) model [17]. The SH co...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.