Quark confinement consistent with holography due to hyperbolic magnetic monopoles and hyperbolic vortices unifiedly reduced from symmetric instantons

Kei-Ichi Kondo

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 108 references

Quark confinement consistent with holography due to hyperbolic magnetic monopoles and hyperbolic vortices unifiedly reduced from symmetric instantons

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that quark confinement follows from symmetric instantons reduced to hyperbolic monopoles and vortices, whose dilute gas makes the Wilson loop obey an area law.

desk verdict A self-described review that usefully assembles the hyperbolic monopole/vortex literature, but the abstract's claim that confinement is 'shown to be realized' outruns what the area-law calculation actually supports. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.20372 v1 pith:RD6AGE65 submitted 2025-07-27 hep-th

Kei-Ichi Kondo This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-th

keywords quarkconfinementhyperbolicmagneticmonopolevortexsymmetricinstantondimensionalreductionWilsonlooparealawholographydualsuperconductivity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review paper argues that quark confinement—the empirical fact that quarks are never found alone—can be traced to a specific family of pure SU(2) gauge-theory configurations. Demanding that an instanton be invariant under a spatial rotation, up to a gauge transformation, forces the four-dimensional Euclidean space to factor conformally into a negatively curved hyperbolic factor times a compact circle or sphere; dimensional reduction then turns the self-dual equations into magnetic-monopole equations on the hyperbolic space $H^3$ and vortex equations on the hyperbolic plane $H^2$. The two topological defects are shown to be equivalent, the monopole is fixed by its boundary data (a holographic statement on $AdS_3$), and a dilute gas of such defects makes the Wilson-loop expectation value decay as an exponential of the loop area. The significance is that this gives a concrete semi-classical picture of confinement from the gauge field alone, without adding scalar fields, and ties that picture to holography.

What carries the argument

Central object: the spatially symmetric instanton, defined as a solution of the self-dual gauge equation invariant under a spatial rotation up to a compensating gauge transformation. The $SO(2)$ case reduces the instanton to a hyperbolic magnetic monopole on $H^3$; the $SO(3)$ case reduces it to a hyperbolic vortex on $H^2$. The compact directions $S^1$ and $S^2$ are what make the four-dimensional action finite, so these lower-dimensional defects can contribute to the gauge-theory path integral, unlike time-translation-invariant monopoles. The unification is carried by the identity $\lVert\Phi(x^4,x^3,\rho)\rVert^2 = [\rho^2|\varphi(x^4,r)|^2+(x^3)^2]/(4r^2)$, which relates the bulk monopole field to the boundary vortex field; the same defect appears as a vortex on the equatorial slice $x^3=0$ and as a monopole in the bulk. The area law is then produced by two standard implements: the identity rewriting the non-Abelian Wilson loop as a $U(1)$ flux integral, and the dilute-gas summation over instantons and anti-instantons.

What would settle it

Evaluate the omitted measure $\mu(\lambda)$ that defines $K$ in Eq. (338): if the collective-coordinate integral diverges or the one-instanton contribution vanishes after including the functional determinant, the dilute-gas string tension has no well-defined value and the area-law conclusion fails. A lattice simulation of SU(2) gauge theory restricted to configurations with the relevant rotational symmetry would show whether the area law actually survives beyond the dilute-gas approximation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the non-perturbative gauge-theory vacuum is disordered by hyperbolic magnetic monopoles and hyperbolic vortices obtained from symmetric instantons, and that this disorder confines quarks. The paper establishes the chain: conformal equivalence $R^4\setminus R^2 \simeq H^3 \times S^1$ and $R^4\setminus R^1 \simeq H^2 \times S^2$; restriction to instantons invariant under the corresponding rotation group; dimensional reduction to the first-order monopole equation on $H^3$ or the vortex equation on $H^2$; an explicit norm identity relating the monopole scalar field to the vortex scalar field; and finally a dilute-instanton-gas computation in which the Wilson loop average obeys the area law with string tension $\sigma = 2K e^{-S_1/\hbar}[\cos(\theta c_2)-\cos(\theta c_2+2\pi J c_1)]$. It also shows that on the conformal boundary the non-Abelian Wilson loop reduces to an Abelian $U(1)$ flux integral, so Abelian and magnetic-monopole dominance hold there, and that singular symmetric instantons produce fractional topological charge.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the gauge-theory path integral is approximated by a dilute gas of the symmetric-instanton reductions, with the collective-coordinate measure constant $K$ in Eq. (338) left undetermined; if other field configurations contribute substantially, or if $K$ is zero or divergent, the area-law string tension is not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Unlike a time-translation-invariant monopole, which has infinite four-dimensional action and drops out of the path integral, the spatially symmetric instanton reductions have finite action and can contribute to the quantum gauge theory.
In a $\theta$-vacuum, the Wilson loop average obeys the area law with the stated string tension; quarks feel a linear static potential when the representation is half-integer, while integer-representation charges are screened.
On the conformal boundary $\partial H^3 \simeq S^2$, the non-Abelian Wilson loop reduces to an Abelian $U(1)$ Wilson loop, implementing Abelian dominance and magnetic-monopole dominance.
The magnetic charge of a hyperbolic monopole equals the vortex number, computed as a boundary flux integral, so the two topological objects are one defect seen in different dimensions.
Singular symmetric instantons with nontrivial holonomy around the singularity yield fractional topological charges (for example $c_1=3/2$) and extend the gas to non-integer vortices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial: if the omitted collective-coordinate measure $K$ can be evaluated explicitly, the formula for $\sigma$ becomes a quantitative prediction for the $\theta$-dependence of the string tension that lattice simulations could test directly.
Editorial: the conformal-equivalence selection rule offers a criterion for choosing spacetime compactifications in semiclassical studies of confinement: only compactifications obtained by quotienting a symmetry group of instantons give finite-action contributions; this could remove the arbitrariness noted in the introduction.
Editorial: the holographic reduction works in pure gauge theory on $AdS_3$ without supersymmetry or string theory; if it survives beyond the dilute-gas approximation, it would provide a minimal toy model for a confinement-holography correspondence.
Editorial: because the area law comes from center-vortex counting, one could try to isolate symmetric-instanton dominance numerically by measuring Wilson loops in sectors with prescribed rotational symmetry, giving a direct check of whether the dilute-gas mechanism is the dominant one.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

You should know two things about arXiv:2507.20372. First, it is explicitly a review — the abstract says so, and nearly every proposition is attributed to prior work (Atiyah, Witten, Manton, Nash, Maldonado, Landweber). Don't read it expecting a new result. Second, the paper's central area-law argument is honest in the body and overstated in the abstract. Section XII computes the Wilson loop in the dimensionally reduced U(1) gauge-scalar theory on H2 within a dilute vortex gas; the string tension σ in Eq. (333) contains an undetermined constant K, which the paper itself admits it has not computed (Eq. 338). The abstract nevertheless says confinement "is shown to be realized." That is the wrong verb for a semi-classical picture with an uncomputed constant.

What the paper does well: it is a competent, well-organized synthesis. The derivations I spot-checked — the Nash solutions of the Bogomolny equation on H3, the vortex solutions via the superpotential, the Maldonado relation between the monopole and vortex fields, the JNR and ADHM constructions — are standard and correctly reproduced. The CDGFN-decomposition viewpoint in Section XIII is a useful framing, and the account of why hyperbolic monopoles have a holographic boundary description, unlike flat-space monopoles, is accurate. For a graduate student entering this literature, this is a genuinely useful road map.

The soft spots, in proportion. The area law is derived in a fixed symmetric-instanton sector of a dimensionally reduced 2D theory, and the paper never shows that the full 4D SU(2) path integral is dominated by that sector. The finite-action argument in Eq. (29) establishes that these configurations contribute, not that everything else is subleading. Relatedly, the reduction of the non-Abelian Wilson loop to the boundary Abelian Wilson loop (Prop. 23) is asserted as a consequence of Prop. 16, but the holographic correspondence is deferred in Section IX with the paper's own words: "the proof is too complicated to give a review here." These are load-bearing steps, and they are precisely the steps one would need to call the result "confinement in Yang-Mills." The undetermined K is a third, smaller issue: the area-law shape survives, but there is no numerical string tension. The dilute-gas approximation is also invoked without discussion of its regime of validity here, though that is a minor point for a review.

Who this is for: people working on semi-classical confinement mechanisms, and anyone who wants a single reference tying together hyperbolic monopoles, hyperbolic vortices, symmetric instantons, and the CDGFN decomposition. It deserves a serious referee. The referee's job should be to insist that the abstract and conclusions match the body's caveats: "consistent with a semi-classical picture" rather than "shown to be realized," and an explicit statement that K and sector dominance remain open. With those changes, this is a publishable review.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper is a review of a proposed semi-classical mechanism for quark confinement. It starts from the conformal equivalences R^4\R^2 ≃ H^3 × S^1 and R^4\R^1 ≃ H^2 × S^2, restricts 4D Euclidean SU(2) Yang-Mills configurations to SO(2)- or SO(3)-symmetric instantons, and dimensionally reduces them to hyperbolic magnetic monopoles on H^3 and hyperbolic vortices on H^2. The text reproduces explicit monopole and vortex solutions, derives the relationship between the two types of defects, discusses holographic boundary data for hyperbolic monopoles, and then uses a non-Abelian Stokes theorem together with a dilute instanton gas to compute the Wilson loop expectation value. Proposition 22 and Eq. (333) claim an area law with string tension σ = 2K e^{-S1/ℏ}[cos(θc2) − cos(θc2 + 2πJ c1)], which is the basis for the claimed quark confinement. Appendices review the ADHM and S^1-equivariant ADHM constructions and the Cho-Duan-Ge-Faddeev-Niemi decomposition. The central advertised claim is that the non-perturbative vacuum disordered by these hyperbolic defects realizes Wilson's area law.

Significance. The review has real expository value: it collects in one place the standard results on Atiyah hyperbolic monopoles, Witten-Manton hyperbolic vortices, their explicit analytic solutions (Propositions 5 and 12, Examples 4 and 8), the relation between the two (Propositions 2–4), and the equivariant ADHM construction (Appendix C). These parts are largely standard material and are quoted with appropriate references. The proposed unification of monopoles and vortices through conformal equivalence is clearly presented and is a useful organizing principle. If the area-law calculation of Section XII were fully justified—in particular, if the dominance of the symmetric-instanton sector and the constant K in Eq. (338) were established—the result would be a significant semi-classical derivation of confinement with a holographic flavor. In its present form, however, the confinement claim is conditional on at least two unproven steps, so the significance is that of a promising framework rather than an established derivation.

major comments (3)

[Section XII, Eq. (338)] Equation (338) explicitly leaves the collective-coordinate constant K undetermined, stating that the measure μ(λ) is omitted. This constant enters the string tension σ in Eq. (333) multiplicatively. As a result, the paper provides no numerical value for σ, no proof that σ is positive, and no smallness parameter controlling the dilute-gas expansion used in Proposition 22. The area-law statement should either be accompanied by a computation (or at least a bound) for K, or explicitly weakened to an area-law form with an undetermined coefficient.
[Sections III and XII, Eqs. (29), (32), (167), (333)] The finite-action conditions (29) and (32) show only that the SO(2)- and SO(3)-symmetric instanton configurations are admissible in the 4D Yang-Mills path integral; they do not demonstrate that these configurations dominate over all other field configurations. The Wilson-loop computation in Section XII is performed in the dimensionally reduced U(1)-gauge-scalar theory on H^2 (Eqs. (167)–(168)), and Eq. (333) is a statement about that 2D model, not directly about the original 4D SU(2) Yang-Mills theory. A quantitative estimate of the contribution of non-symmetric configurations, or an explicit restriction of the claim to the symmetric-instanton sector, is required before the result can be read as a property of 4D Yang-Mills theory.
[Sections IX and XII, Propositions 16 and 23] Proposition 23 is the hinge that replaces the non-Abelian Wilson loop by the Abelian boundary Wilson loop, yet its proof is given as an immediate consequence of Proposition 16, while the holographic correspondence on which it relies is explicitly deferred: Section IX states that the proof is too complicated to give in the review. Since this step connects the original 4D Wilson loop to the 2D Abelian quantity whose dilute-gas average is then computed, the missing argument is load-bearing and should be supplied, or the result should be labeled as conditional on the deferred proof.

minor comments (4)

[Abstract and Introduction] There are several typographical errors that should be corrected, including 'vortic es' in the abstract, 'quarksrs' in Section I, 'condensationon' in Section I, and 'the the non-perturbative vacuum' in the abstract.
[Section XIV] In the first bullet of the conclusions, 'Both H3 and H3 are curved space AdS3 and AdS2' should presumably read 'Both H3 and H2 are curved spaces AdS3 and AdS2'; the current sentence confuses the two spaces.
[Section XII] The phrase 'The dilute gau approximation' before Proposition 22 contains a typo. In addition, the sentence after Eq. (341) says the 'volume dependence disappears by taking the ratio', but it is the total volume V that cancels, not the dependence on the loop area A(C).
[References] The reference list should be checked for accuracy: [9] cites papers on quantum liquid models for the QCD vacuum, but the text uses it for the Nielsen-Olesen vortex, whose original reference is H.B. Nielsen and P. Olesen, Nucl. Phys. B 61 (1973) 45.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular reasoning found; the Wilson-loop area law is a standard dilute-gas computation, and the cited self-results have independent support.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is a review of known dimensional reductions and classical solutions. The central new step, Section XII, computes the Wilson loop average in a dilute instanton/vortex gas. The string tension σ in Eq. (333) is obtained by summing the grand partition functions; no parameter is fitted to the Wilson loop data, and the undetermined collective-coordinate constant K (Eq. (338), explicitly left open) is not used as a fitted input. The reduction of the non-Abelian Wilson loop to an Abelian one rests on the non-Abelian Stokes theorem (Prop. 21), whose proof is cited to Kondo (2008)/Kondo et al. (2015); although these are self-citations, the theorem is also attributed to Diakonov-Petrov and is a parameter-free identity independent of the confinement claim, so it does not make the argument circular. The holographic boundary reduction (Prop. 16/23) is asserted from prior results [54,55,57], and the paper itself states the proof is too complicated to include (Sec. IX); this is an omitted proof or an unverified assumption, not a circular reduction. The main scientific weakness—that the full 4D SU(2) path integral is assumed to be dominated by the symmetric-instanton sector—is an unproven dominance/approximation issue, not a self-referential equation. No step equates the conclusion to the premise by construction. Hence score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities. It relies on established mathematical facts (conformal equivalence, self-duality) and physical assumptions (dilute gas dominance, holographic determination). The only undetermined quantity is the constant K in the area-law calculation.

free parameters (1)

K
Normalization constant of the dilute instanton gas partition function, left undetermined in Section XII, Eq. (338). The string tension in Prop. 22 depends on K, so the prediction is not quantitative.

assumptions (4)

standard math Four-dimensional Euclidean Yang-Mills theory is conformally invariant, and the self-dual equations are conformally invariant.
Used throughout Section II to justify conformal equivalence between E4 and H3 × S1 / H2 × S2.
domain assumption Symmetric instantons with spatial symmetries SO(2) or SO(3) give finite four-dimensional action after dimensional reduction because the compact directions have finite volume.
Section III, Eqs. (29) and (32), asserts that finite lower-dimensional action plus compact fiber integration yields finite total action, which is essential for the configurations to contribute to the path integral.
ad hoc to paper The dilute instanton gas approximation is valid for the dimensionally reduced theory.
Section XII invokes the standard dilute gas approximation without quantitative justification of its applicability to the hyperbolic monopole/vortex ensemble.
domain assumption Hyperbolic magnetic monopoles are completely determined by their boundary values on the conformal sphere at infinity (holography).
Section IX, Propositions 14 and 15, cites Braam-Austin (1990) and Norbury (1999) for this property, which is then used to reduce the Wilson loop to the boundary.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quark confinement consistent with holography due to hyperbolic magnetic monopoles and hyperbolic vortices unifiedly reduced from symmetric instantons." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RD6AGE65

@misc{pith2026250720372,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quark confinement consistent with holography due to hyperbolic magnetic monopoles and hyperbolic vortices unifiedly reduced from symmetric instantons},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RD6AGE65}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.20372}
}

read the original abstract

We give a review on hyperbolic magnetic monopoles and hyperbolic vortices obtained in the unified way through the conformal equivalence by the dimensional reduction from the symmetric instantons with various spatial symmetries in the four-dimensional Euclidean Yang-Mills theory. They are used to understand quark confinement in the sense of the area law of the Wilson loop average in a semi-classical picture from a unified treatment of Atiyah's hyperbolic magnetic monopole and Witten-Manton's hyperbolic vortex. In this way quark confinement is shown to be realized by the the non-perturbative vacuum disordered by these topological defects. For this purpose we start from the 4-dim. Euclidean Yang-Mills theory and require the conformal equivalence between the 4-dim. Euclidean space and the possible curved spacetimes with some compact dimensions. This requirement forces us to restrict the gauge configurations of 4-dim.Yang-Mills instantons to those with some spatial symmetries (called symmetric instantons) which are identified with magnetic monopoles and vortices living in the lower-dimensional curved hyperbolic spacetime with constant negative curvature through the dimensional reduction. At the same time, this scheme caused by the dimensional reduction give a holographic description of hyperbolic magnetic monopole dominance on AdS3 in the rigorous way without any further assumptions, which does not hold in the flat Euclidean case. This unified treatment of two topological defects is shown to give the semi-classical picture for quark confinement in the sense of Wilson. We give the understanding of the result from the viewpoint of the gauge-covariant Cho-Duan-Ge-Faddeev-Niemi decomposition for the gauge field.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.20372 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Fig.2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2: 4-dim. Euclidean space [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (11 more)

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5: Conformal equivalence, symmetric instanton, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6: The relationship between hyperbolic vortices [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7: The profile functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8: The norm of the scalar field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9: The norm of the scalar field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: FIG. 10: The relationship between the complex number [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png]

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: FIG. 11: The 1-vortex solution with the center at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_11.png]

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: FIG. 12: (Left) The relationship between Wilson loop [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_12.png]

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: FIG. 13: The Wilson loop [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_13.png]

**Figure 14.** Figure 14: Remark 20. The independent field degrees of freedom in both sides of the Cho-Duan-Ge-Faddeev-Niemi decomposition of the D = 4 and SU(2) Yang-Mills field have the correct matching as follows. FIG. 14: (Left) n, ∂µn, ∂µn × n as a basis for SU(2) space, (Right) Rotation…

**Figure 15.** Figure 15: FIG. 15: The color field and symmetry breaking. (Left [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_15.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

[1]

Yang and R.L

C.N. Yang and R.L. Mills, Conservation of isotopic spin and isotopic gauge invariance, Phys. Rev. 96, 191–195 (1954)

1954
[2]

(294) The center of the vortex is given by the zero of φ: φ(r, t) = 0 is on the (t, r) = (0 , λ)

= 4r2λ2 (t2 + r2 + λ2)2 . (294) The center of the vortex is given by the zero of φ: φ(r, t) = 0 is on the (t, r) = (0 , λ). The U (1) gauge ﬁeld is written as at = ∂ ∂r ln Ξ 2 − 1 r = − 2λ2r (t2 + r2)(t2 + r2 + λ2) , (295) ar = − ∂ ∂t ln Ξ 2 = 2λ2t (t2 + r2)(t2 + r2 + λ2) . (296) Then the ﬁeld strength of the U (1) gauge ﬁeld reads Fr4 := ∂rat − ∂tar = 4λ...

1986
[3]

(351) Example 12 (Wu-Yang magnetic monopole)

(350) 36 In particular, the one-instanton solution of Belavin- Polyakov-Shwarts-Tyupkin (BPST) [13] corresponds to the following choice of Ansatz function: A0 =F (r, t)r, A 1 = −F (r, t)t, φ1 = − F (r, t)rt, φ 2 = F (r, t)r2 − 1, F (r, t) = 2 r2 + t2 + λ2 . (351) Example 12 (Wu-Yang magnetic monopole) . The Wu-Yang magnetic monopole conﬁguration (Wu and Y...

1975
[4]

(362) where Gµν :=∂µcν − ∂ν cµ, H µν := −g−1n · (∂µn × ∂νn), Dµφa :=∂µφa + ǫabgcµφb

− 1]Hµν }n + (Dµφ1∂ν n − Dνφ1∂µn) + (Dµφ2∂ν n × n − Dνφ2∂µn × n). (362) where Gµν :=∂µcν − ∂ν cµ, H µν := −g−1n · (∂µn × ∂νn), Dµφa :=∂µφa + ǫabgcµφb. (363) 37 n n U(1)U(1) SU(2)/U(1) =S 2 0 SU(2) U(1) ~ RD RD x (x) x FIG. 15: The color ﬁeld and symmetry breaking. (Left panel) The original local SU (2) gauge symmetry is preserved by a local embedding of t...

1999
[5]

(C21) 45 Example 16 (1-magnetic monopole)

Therefore, we obtain the scalar ﬁeld Φ(0) at X = 0: Φ(0) = Aϕ(0) = V † 0 1 2 ( −µ L −L† M ) V0 = (−µ L )1 2 ( −µ L −L† M )( µ L† ) = 1 2 (−µ L )( −µ2 + LL† −L†µ + M L† ) = 1 2 (−µ L )( 1 0 ) = − 1 2 µ. (C21) 45 Example 16 (1-magnetic monopole) . For n = 1 , ˆM that satisﬁes the constraints is given e.g., by ˆM = (√ 1 − a2 ai ) (|a| < 1). (C22) In fact, (i...

2017
[6]

Gell-Mann, A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons, Phys

M. Gell-Mann, A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons, Phys. Lett. 8, 214–215 (1964). G. Zweig, An SU(3) Model for Strong Interaction Sym- metry and its Breaking, CERN Report No.8182/TH.401 (1964)

1964
[7]

Nambu, Strings, monopoles, and gauge ﬁelds, Phys

Y. Nambu, Strings, monopoles, and gauge ﬁelds, Phys. Rev. D 10, 4262–4268 (1974). G. ’t Hooft, in: High Energy Physics, edited by A. Zichichi (Editorice Compositori, Bologna, 1975). S. Mandelstam, Vortices and quark conﬁnement in non-abelian gauge theories, Phys. Report 23, 245–249 (1976)

1974
[8]

Polyakov, Compact gauge ﬁelds and the infrared catastrophe, Phys

A.M. Polyakov, Compact gauge ﬁelds and the infrared catastrophe, Phys. Lett. B 59, 82–84 (1975)

1975

Show all 108 references

[9]

Polyakov, Quark conﬁnement and topology of gauge theories, Nucl

A.M. Polyakov, Quark conﬁnement and topology of gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B 120, 429–458 (1977)

1977
[10]

Seiberg and E

N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Electric-magnetic duality, 46 monopole condensation, and conﬁnement in N=2 super- symmetric Yang-Mills theory, Nucl. Phys. B 426, 19– 52 (1994), Erratum-ibid. B 430, 485–486 (1994). [hep- th/9407087]

1994
[11]

Bardeen, L

J. Bardeen, L. Cooper and J. R. Schrieﬀer, Theory of superconductivity, Phys. Rev. 108, 1175 (1957)

1957
[12]

Ginzburg and L.D

V.L. Ginzburg and L.D. Landau, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 20, 1064 (1950). English translation in: L. D. Landau, Collected papers (Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1965) p. 546

1950
[13]

H. B. Nielsen and P. Olesen, A Quantum Liquid Model for the QCD Vacuum: Gauge and Rotational Invariance of Domained and Quantized Homogeneous Color Fields, Nucl. Phys. B 160, 380–396 (1979) J. Ambjorn and P. Olesen, On the Formation of a Ran- dom Color Magnetic Quantum Liquid ...

1979
[14]

Abrikosov, The magnetic properties of supercon- ducting alloys

A.A. Abrikosov, The magnetic properties of supercon- ducting alloys. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, 2(3), 199–208 (1957)

1957
[15]

Wilson, Conﬁnement of quarks, Phys

K. Wilson, Conﬁnement of quarks, Phys. Rev. D 10, 2445–2459 (1974)

1974
[16]

Kondo, S

K.-I. Kondo, S. Kato, A. Shibata and T. Shinohara, Phys. Rept. 579, 1 (2015). [arXiv:1409.1599 [hep-th]]

2015 arXiv
[17]

Belavin, A

A.A. Belavin, A. M. Polyakov, A.S. Shwarts and Yu.S. Tyupkin, Pseudoparticle Solutions of the Yang-Mills Equations, Phys.Lett. B 59, 85–87 (1975)

1975
[18]

Quark Conﬁnement and Field Theory

E. Corrigan and D.B. Fairlie, Scalar Field Theory and Exact Solutions to a Classical SU(2) Gauge Theory, Phys. Lett. B 67, 69–71 (1977). G. ’t Hooft, Computation of the Quantum Eﬀects Due to a Four-Dimensional Pseudoparticle, Phys. Rev. D 14, 3432–3450 (1976); Erratum-ibid. D ...

1977
[19]

Witten, Some Exact Multi - Instanton Solutions of Classical Yang-Mills Theory, Phys

E. Witten, Some Exact Multi - Instanton Solutions of Classical Yang-Mills Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 121– 124 (1977)

1977
[20]

Manton, Instantons on a line, Phys

N.S. Manton, Instantons on a line, Phys. Lett.B 76, 111–112 (1978)

1978
[21]

Manton, Complex Structure of Monopoles, Nucl

N.S. Manton, Complex Structure of Monopoles, Nucl. Phys. B 135, 319–332 (1978)

1978
[22]

Forgacs and N.S

P. Forgacs and N.S. Manton, Space-Time Symmetries in Gauge Theories, Commun. Math. Phys. 72, 15–35 (1980)

1980
[23]

Manton and P

N. Manton and P. Sutcliﬀe, Topological Solitons (Cam- bridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics), (Cam- bridge Univ. Press, 2004)

2004
[24]

M. F. Atiyah and R. S. Ward, Instantons and algebraic geometry, Comm. Math. Phys. 55, 117–124 (1977)

1977
[25]

Ward, A Yang-Mills Higgs Monopole of Charge 2, Commun.Math.Phys

R.S. Ward, A Yang-Mills Higgs Monopole of Charge 2, Commun.Math.Phys. 79, 317–325 (1981)

1981
[26]

N. J. Hitchin, Monopoles and geodesics, Commun. Math. Phys. 83, 579–602 (1982)

1982
[27]

Murry, Monopoles and spectral curves for arbi- trary Lie groups, Commun

M.K. Murry, Monopoles and spectral curves for arbi- trary Lie groups, Commun. Math. Phys. 90, 263–271 (1983)

1983
[28]

Hitchin and M.K

N.J. Hitchin and M.K. Murry, Spectral curves and the ADHM method, Commun. Math. Phys. 114, 463–474 (1988)

1988
[29]

Atiyah, N.J

M.F. Atiyah, N.J. Hitchin, V.G. Drinfeld and Y.I. Manin, Construction of instantons, Phys. Lett. A 65, 185–187 (1978)

1978
[30]

Nahm, The algebraic geometry of multimonopoles, Bonn University preprint, BONN-HE-82-30

W. Nahm, The algebraic geometry of multimonopoles, Bonn University preprint, BONN-HE-82-30
[31]

Nash and S

C. Nash and S. Sen Topology and Geometry for Physi- cists, (Academic Press, 1992). and (Dover Publications, 2011)

1992
[32]

Donaldson, S.K., Nahm’s equations and the classiﬁca- tion of monopoles, Commun. Math. Phys. 96, 387–407 (1984)

1984
[33]

Hitchin, N.J., On the construction of monopoles, Comm. Math. Phys. 89, no. 2, 145–190 (1983)

1983
[34]

Math., Spe- cial 70th Birthday Issue for Sir Michael Atiyah

Ward R.S., Two Integrable Systems Related to Hyper- bolic Monopoles, To appear in Asian J. Math., Spe- cial 70th Birthday Issue for Sir Michael Atiyah. solv- int/9811012
[35]

Jaﬀe, A., Taubes, C., Vortices and monopoles, (Birkhauser, Boston, 1980)

1980
[36]

Thesis, The University of Melbourne (2017)

Joseph Yew Choe Chan, On hyperbolic monopoles, Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Melbourne (2017)

2017
[37]

Bolognesi, Multi-monopoles and magnetic bags, Nucl

S. Bolognesi, Multi-monopoles and magnetic bags, Nucl. Phys. B 752, 93–123 (2006). e-Print: 0512133 [hep-th]

2006
[38]

e-Print: 1404.1846 [hep-th]

Stefano Bolognesi, Alex Cockburn, and Paul Sutcliﬀe, Hyperbolic monopoles, JNR data and spectral curves, Nonlinearity 28, 211 (2014). e-Print: 1404.1846 [hep-th]

2014 arXiv
[39]

e-Print: 1504.01477 [hep-th]

Stefano Bolognesi, Derek Harland, and Paul Sutcliﬀe, Magnetic bags in hyperbolic space, Phys.Rev.D 92, 025052 (2015). e-Print: 1504.01477 [hep-th]

2015 arXiv
[40]

Strachan, Low velocity scattering of vortices in a modiﬁed Abelian Higgs model, J

I.A.B. Strachan, Low velocity scattering of vortices in a modiﬁed Abelian Higgs model, J. Math. Phys. 33, 102–110 (1992)

1992
[41]

Garcia-Prada, A direct existence proof for the vor- tex equations over a compact Riemann surface, Bull

O. Garcia-Prada, A direct existence proof for the vor- tex equations over a compact Riemann surface, Bull. London Maht. Soc. 26, 88–96 (1994)

1994
[42]

Samols, Vortex scattering Commun

T.M. Samols, Vortex scattering Commun. Math. Phys. 145, 149–180 (1992)

1992
[43]

Manton and S.M

N.S. Manton and S.M. Nasir, Volume of vortex moduli spaces, Commun. Math. Phys. 199, 591–604 (1999). e- Print: hep-th/9807017 [hep-th]

1999 arXiv
[44]

Manton, Statistical mechanics of vortices, Pub- lished in: Nucl.Phys.B 400, 624–632 (1993)

N.S. Manton, Statistical mechanics of vortices, Pub- lished in: Nucl.Phys.B 400, 624–632 (1993). e-Print: 2204.01389 [hep-th]

1993 arXiv
[45]

Manton and Norman A

Nicholas S. Manton and Norman A. Rink, Vortices on Hyperbolic Surfaces, J. Phys. A 43, 434024 (2010). e- Print: 0912.2058 [hep-th]

2010 arXiv
[46]

Maldonado and N.S

R. Maldonado and N.S. Manton, Analytic vortex so- lutions on compact hyperbolic surfaces, J.Phys.A 48, 245403 (2015). e-Print: 1502.01990 [hep-th]

2015 arXiv
[47]

Manton , Five Vortex Equations J

Nicholas S. Manton , Five Vortex Equations J. Phys. A 50, 125403 (2017). e-Print: 1612.06710 [hep-th]

2017 arXiv
[48]

‘t Hooft, Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity, arXiv: gr-qc/9310026

G. ‘t Hooft, Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity, arXiv: gr-qc/9310026

arXiv
[49]

Susskind, The world as a hologram, J

L. Susskind, The world as a hologram, J. Math. Phys. 36, 6377-6396 (1995). arXiv: hep-th/9409089

1995 arXiv
[50]

Maldacena, The large N limit of superconformal ﬁeld theories and super gravity, Adv

J. Maldacena, The large N limit of superconformal ﬁeld theories and super gravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998). arXiv: hep-th/971120

1998
[51]

Witten, Anti De Sitter space and holography, Adv

E. Witten, Anti De Sitter space and holography, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 253 (1998). arXiv: hep- th/9802150

1998
[52]

Aharony, S.S

O. Aharony, S.S. Gubser, J. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, and Y. Oz, Large N ﬁeld theories, string theory and gravity, Phys. Rep. 323, 183–386 (2000)

2000
[53]

Atiyah, Instantons in two and four dimensions, Commun

M.F. Atiyah, Instantons in two and four dimensions, Commun. Math. Phys. 93, 437–451 (1984)

1984
[54]

Atiyah, Magnetic monopoles in hyperbolic spaces, 47 in Proc

M.F. Atiyah, Magnetic monopoles in hyperbolic spaces, 47 in Proc. of Bombay Colloquium 1984 on Vector Bundles on Algebraic Varieties, Oxford University Press (1987), 1–34

1987
[55]

Chakrabarti, Construction of Hyperbolic Monopoles, J

A. Chakrabarti, Construction of Hyperbolic Monopoles, J. Math.Phys. 27, 340–348 (1986)

1986
[56]

Nash, Geometry of Hyperbolic Monopoles J

C. Nash, Geometry of Hyperbolic Monopoles J. Math. Phys. 27, 2160–2164 (1986)

1986
[57]

Chakrabarti, Harrison-neugebauer Type Transfor- mations for Instantons: Multicharged Monopoles as Limits, Phys.Rev.D 25, 3282–3298 (1982)

A. Chakrabarti, Harrison-neugebauer Type Transfor- mations for Instantons: Multicharged Monopoles as Limits, Phys.Rev.D 25, 3282–3298 (1982)

1982
[58]

Braam and D.M

P.J. Braam and D.M. Austin, Boundary values of hy- perbolic monopoles, Nonlinearity 3, 809–823 (1990)

1990
[59]

Murray and M

M. Murray and M. Singer, Spectral curves of non- integral hyperbolic monopoles, Nonlinearity 9, 973–997 (1996)

1996
[60]

Stuart Jarvis and Paul Norbury, ZERO AND IN- FINITE CUR V ATURE LIMITS OF HYPERBOLIC MONOPOLES, Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 29, 737–744 (1997)

1997
[61]

Norbury, Asymptotic values of hyperbolic monopoles, e-Print: math/9911146 [math.DG]

P. Norbury, Asymptotic values of hyperbolic monopoles, e-Print: math/9911146 [math.DG]

arXiv
[62]

Murray, Paul Norbury and Michael A

Michael K. Murray, Paul Norbury and Michael A. Singer, Hyperbolic monopoles and holomorphic spheres, e-Print: math/0111202 [math.DG]

arXiv
[63]

Paul Norbury, Boundary algebras of hyperbolic monopoles, e-Print: math-ph/0106013 [math-ph]

arXiv
[64]

235, 275–288 (2003)

Gabor Etesi and Tamas Hausel, On Yang–Mills In- stantons over Multi-Centered Gravitational Instantons, Commun.Math.Phys. 235, 275–288 (2003). e-Print: hep-th/0207196

2003 arXiv
[65]

e-Print: hep-th/0303146

Gabor Etesi, Classiﬁcation of ’t Hooft instantons over multicentered gravitational instantons, Nucl.Phys.B 662, 511–530 (2003). e-Print: hep-th/0303146

2003 arXiv
[66]

Romao, Spectral curves and the mass of hyperbolic monopoles, Com- mun.Math.Phys

Paul Norbury and Nuno M. Romao, Spectral curves and the mass of hyperbolic monopoles, Com- mun.Math.Phys. 270, 295–333 (2007). e-Print: math- ph/0512083 [math-ph]

2007
[67]

277, 161–187 (2008)

Oliver Nash, Singular hyperbolic monopoles, Com- mun.Math.Phys. 277, 161–187 (2008)

2008
[68]

Manton and Paul M

Nicholas S. Manton and Paul M. Sutcliﬀe, Platonic hy- perbolic monopoles, Commun. Math. Phys. 325, 821– 845 (2014). e-Print: 1207.2636 [hep-th]

2014 arXiv
[69]

Guido Franchetti and Rafael Maldonado, Monopoles, instantons and the Helmholtz equation, J. Math. Phys. 57, 073502 (2016). e-Print: 1603.09575 [hep-th]

2016 arXiv
[70]

Lang, Hyperbolic monopoles with continuous sym- metries, J

C.J. Lang, Hyperbolic monopoles with continuous sym- metries, J. Geom. Phys. 203, 105258 (2024). e-Print: 2310.10626 [math-ph]

2024 arXiv
[71]

Lang, Instantons with continuous conformal sym- metries: Hyperbolic and singular monopoles and more, oh my!, e-Print: 2501.07406 [math-ph]

C.J. Lang, Instantons with continuous conformal sym- metries: Hyperbolic and singular monopoles and more, oh my!, e-Print: 2501.07406 [math-ph]
[72]

Maldonado, Hyperbolic monopoles from hyper- bolic vortices, Nonlinearity 30, 2443 (2017)

R. Maldonado, Hyperbolic monopoles from hyper- bolic vortices, Nonlinearity 30, 2443 (2017). e-Print: 1508.07304 [hep-th]

2017 arXiv
[73]

Harland, Hyperbolic calorons, monopoles, and in- stantons, Commun

D. Harland, Hyperbolic calorons, monopoles, and in- stantons, Commun. Math. Phys. 280, 727–735 (2008). e-Print: hep-th/0703277 [hep-th]

2008 arXiv
[74]

e-Print: 1503.01198 [math-ph]

Lesley Sibner, Robert Sibner and Yisong Yang, Ex- istence of Hyperbolic Calorons, Proc.Roy.Soc.Lond.A 471 (2015) 0970. e-Print: 1503.01198 [math-ph]

2015 arXiv
[75]

thesis (2015)

Alexander Cockburn, Aspects of vortices and hyperbolic monopoles, Ph.D. thesis (2015)

2015
[76]

Landweber, Singular instantons with SO(3) sym- metry, e-Print: math/0503611 [math.DG]

G.D. Landweber, Singular instantons with SO(3) sym- metry, e-Print: math/0503611 [math.DG]

arXiv
[77]

Forgacs, Z

P. Forgacs, Z. Horvath and L. Palla, Exact, Fractionally Charged Self-Dual Solution, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 392 (1981). P. Forgacs, Z. Horvath and L. Palla, One can have noninteger topological charge, Z. Phys.C 12, 359 (1982)

1981
[78]

Mason and N

L.J. Mason and N. M. J. Woodhouse, Integrability, Self- Duality, and Twistor Theory (London Mathematical So- ciety Monographs) - (Clarendon Press, 1996)

1996
[79]

Chapline and N.S

G. Chapline and N.S. Manton, The Geometrical Sig- niﬁcance of Certain Higgs Potentials: An Approach to Grand Uniﬁcation, Nucl. Phys.B 184, 391–405 (1981)

1981
[80]

Manton, Fermions and Parity Violation in Dimen- sional Reduction Schemes, Nucl.Phys.B 193, 502–516 (1981)

N.S. Manton, Fermions and Parity Violation in Dimen- sional Reduction Schemes, Nucl.Phys.B 193, 502–516 (1981)

1981
[81]

Cho, Restricted gauge theory, Phys

Y.M. Cho, Restricted gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D 21, 1080–1088 (1980). Y.M. Cho, Extended gauge theory and its mass spec- trum, Phys. Rev. D 23, 2415–2426 (1981)

1980
[82]

Duan and M.L

Y.S. Duan and M.L. Ge, Sinica Sci., 11, 1072–1081 (1979)

1979
[83]

Faddeev and A.J

L. Faddeev and A.J. Niemi, Partially dual variables in SU(2) Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1624– 1627 (1999). [hep-th/9807069] L.D. Faddeev and A.J. Niemi, Spin-Charge Separation, Conformal Covariance and the SU(2) Yang-Mills The- ory, Nucl. Phys. B 776, 38-65 (2007)...

1999 arXiv
[84]

Faddeev and A.J

L. Faddeev and A.J. Niemi, Partial duality in SU(N) Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Lett. B 449, 214–218 (1999). [hep-th/9812090]

1999 arXiv
[85]

Faddeev and A.J

L. Faddeev and A.J. Niemi, Decomposing the Yang- Mills ﬁeld, Phys. Lett. B 464, 90–93 (1999). [hep- th/9907180]

1999
[86]

Shabanov, An eﬀective action for monopoles and knot solitons in Yang-Mills theory, Phys

S.V. Shabanov, An eﬀective action for monopoles and knot solitons in Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Lett. B 458, 322–330 (1999). [hep-th/0608111] S.V. Shabanov, Yang-Mills theory as an Abelian theory without gauge ﬁxing, Phys. Lett. B 463, 263–272 (1999). [hep-th/9907182]

1999 arXiv
[87]

Kondo, T

K.-I. Kondo, T. Murakami and T. Shinohara, Yang- Mills theory constructed from Cho–Faddeev–Niemi de- composition, Prog. Theor. Phys. 115, 201–216 (2006). [hep-th/0504107] K.-I. Kondo, T. Murakami and T. Shinohara, BRST quantization of the Yang-Mills theory in the Cho– Faddeev–...

2006 arXiv
[88]

Yuya Tanizaki and Mithat ¨Unsal, Center vortex and conﬁnement in Yang-Mills theory and QCD with anomaly-preserving compactiﬁcations, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 04A108 (2022). e-Print: 2201.06166 [hep-th]

2022 arXiv
[89]

Yui Hayashi and Yuya Tanizaki, Unifying Monopole and Center Vortex as the Semiclassical Conﬁnement Mech- anism Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 171902 (2024). e-Print: 2405.12402 [hep-th]

2024 arXiv
[90]

Yui Hayashi, Tatsuhiro Misumi and Yuya Tanizaki, Semiclassics for the QCD vacuum structure through T- compactiﬁcation with the baryon-’t Hooft ﬂux, JHEP 08, 001 (2024). e-Print: 2402.04320 [hep-th] Yui Hayashi, Tatsuhiro Misumi and Yuya Tanizaki, Monopole-vortex continuity of ...

2024 arXiv
[91]

e-Print: 2405.13696 [hep-th]

Canberk G¨ uvendik, Thomas Schaefer and Mithat¨Unsal, The metamorphosis of semi-classical mechanisms of con- ﬁnement: from monopoles on R × S1 to center-vortices on R3 × T 2, JHEP 11, 163 (2024). e-Print: 2405.13696 [hep-th]

2024 arXiv
[92]

Dashen, Brosl Hasslacher, and Andre Neveu, Nonperturbative Methods and Extended Hadron Mod- els in Field Theory

Roger F. Dashen, Brosl Hasslacher, and Andre Neveu, Nonperturbative Methods and Extended Hadron Mod- els in Field Theory. 3. Four-Dimensional Nonabelian Models, Phys. Rev. D 10, 4138–4142 (1974)

1974
[93]

Diakonov and V.Yu

D.I. Diakonov and V.Yu. Petrov, A formula for the Wil- son loop, Phys. Lett. B 224, 131–135 (1989)

1989
[94]

Diakonov and V

D. Diakonov and V. Petrov, Non-Abelian Stokes theo- rem and quark-monopole interaction, [hep-th/9606104] D. Diakonov and V. Petrov, On the non-Abelian Stokes theorem, [hep-lat/0008004] D. Diakonov and V. Petrov, Non-Abelian Stokes Theorems in Yang-Mills and Gravity Theories, [...

arXiv
[95]

Kondo, Abelian magnetic monopole dominance in quark conﬁnement, Phys

K.-I. Kondo, Abelian magnetic monopole dominance in quark conﬁnement, Phys. Rev. D 58, 105016 (1998). [hep-th/9805153]

1998 arXiv
[96]

Kondo and Y

K.-I. Kondo and Y. Taira, Non-Abelian Stokes Theo- rem and Quark Conﬁnement in SU(3) Yang-Mills gauge theory, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 15, 367–377 (2000); [hep- th/9906129] K.-I. Kondo and Y. Taira, Non-Abelian Stokes Theo- rem and Quark Conﬁnement in SU(N) Yang-Mills gauge theory, ...

2000
[97]

Kondo, Wilson loop and magnetic monopole through a non-Abelian Stokes theorem, Phys

K.-I. Kondo, Wilson loop and magnetic monopole through a non-Abelian Stokes theorem, Phys. Rev. D 77, 085029 (2008). arXiv:0801.1274 [hep-th]

2008 arXiv
[98]

Kondo, Magnetic monopoles and center vortices as gauge-invariant topological defects simultaneously re - sponsible for conﬁnement, J

K.-I. Kondo, Magnetic monopoles and center vortices as gauge-invariant topological defects simultaneously re - sponsible for conﬁnement, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 35, 085001 (2008). arXiv:0802.3829 [hep-th]

2008 arXiv
[99]

Dirac, Quantized Singularities in the Electro- magnetic Field, Proc

P.A.M. Dirac, Quantized Singularities in the Electro- magnetic Field, Proc. Roy. Soc. London, A 133, 60–72 (1931)

1931
[100]

Tai Tsun Wu, Chen Ning Yang, Concept of Noninte- grable Phase Factors and Global Formulation of Gauge Fields, Phys. Rev. D 12, 3845–3857 (1975). T.T. Wu and C.N. Yang, Dirac Monopole Without Strings: Monopole Harmonics, Nucl. Phys. B 107, 365– 380 (1976). Dirac’s Monopole With...

1975
[101]

’t Hooft, Magnetic Monopoles in Uniﬁed Gauge The- ories, Nucl

G. ’t Hooft, Magnetic Monopoles in Uniﬁed Gauge The- ories, Nucl. Phys. B 79, 276–284 (1974). A. M. Polyakov, Particle Spectrum in the Quantum Field Theory, JETP Lett. 20, 194–195 (1974). Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 20, 430–433 (1974)

1974
[102]

Goddard, J

P. Goddard, J. Nuyts, David I. Olive, Gauge Theories and Magnetic Charge, Nucl. Phys. B 125, 1–28 (1977)

1977
[103]

Goddard and D

P. Goddard and D. Olive, New Developments in the Theory of Magnetic Monopoles, Rep. Prog. Phys. 41, 1357–1437 (1978)

1978
[104]

E. B. Bogomolny, Stability of Classical Solutions, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 24 (1976), 449; Yad. Fiz. 24 (1976), 861

1976
[105]

Prasad and C.M

M.K. Prasad and C.M. Sommerﬁeld, Exact classical so- lution for the ‘t Hooft monopole and the Julia-Zee dyon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 760-762
[106]

Jackiw, C

R. Jackiw, C. Nohl and C. Rebbi, Conformal Proper- ties of Pseudoparticle Conﬁgurations, Phys. Rev. D 15, 1642–1646 (1977)

1977
[107]

Rajaraman, Solitons and Instantons: An Introduc- tion to Solitons and Instantons in Quantum Field The- ory (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1987)

R. Rajaraman, Solitons and Instantons: An Introduc- tion to Solitons and Instantons in Quantum Field The- ory (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1987)

1987
[108]

Coleman, The uses of instantons, Aspects of symme- try: Selected Erice lectures of Sidney Coleman (Cam- bridge Univ

S. Coleman, The uses of instantons, Aspects of symme- try: Selected Erice lectures of Sidney Coleman (Cam- bridge Univ. Press, 1985)

1985

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Yang and R.L

C.N. Yang and R.L. Mills, Conservation of isotopic spin and isotopic gauge invariance, Phys. Rev. 96, 191–195 (1954)

1954

[2] [2]

(294) The center of the vortex is given by the zero of φ: φ(r, t) = 0 is on the (t, r) = (0 , λ)

= 4r2λ2 (t2 + r2 + λ2)2 . (294) The center of the vortex is given by the zero of φ: φ(r, t) = 0 is on the (t, r) = (0 , λ). The U (1) gauge ﬁeld is written as at = ∂ ∂r ln Ξ 2 − 1 r = − 2λ2r (t2 + r2)(t2 + r2 + λ2) , (295) ar = − ∂ ∂t ln Ξ 2 = 2λ2t (t2 + r2)(t2 + r2 + λ2) . (296) Then the ﬁeld strength of the U (1) gauge ﬁeld reads Fr4 := ∂rat − ∂tar = 4λ...

1986

[3] [3]

(351) Example 12 (Wu-Yang magnetic monopole)

(350) 36 In particular, the one-instanton solution of Belavin- Polyakov-Shwarts-Tyupkin (BPST) [13] corresponds to the following choice of Ansatz function: A0 =F (r, t)r, A 1 = −F (r, t)t, φ1 = − F (r, t)rt, φ 2 = F (r, t)r2 − 1, F (r, t) = 2 r2 + t2 + λ2 . (351) Example 12 (Wu-Yang magnetic monopole) . The Wu-Yang magnetic monopole conﬁguration (Wu and Y...

1975

[4] [4]

(362) where Gµν :=∂µcν − ∂ν cµ, H µν := −g−1n · (∂µn × ∂νn), Dµφa :=∂µφa + ǫabgcµφb

− 1]Hµν }n + (Dµφ1∂ν n − Dνφ1∂µn) + (Dµφ2∂ν n × n − Dνφ2∂µn × n). (362) where Gµν :=∂µcν − ∂ν cµ, H µν := −g−1n · (∂µn × ∂νn), Dµφa :=∂µφa + ǫabgcµφb. (363) 37 n n U(1)U(1) SU(2)/U(1) =S 2 0 SU(2) U(1) ~ RD RD x (x) x FIG. 15: The color ﬁeld and symmetry breaking. (Left panel) The original local SU (2) gauge symmetry is preserved by a local embedding of t...

1999

[5] [5]

(C21) 45 Example 16 (1-magnetic monopole)

Therefore, we obtain the scalar ﬁeld Φ(0) at X = 0: Φ(0) = Aϕ(0) = V † 0 1 2 ( −µ L −L† M ) V0 = (−µ L )1 2 ( −µ L −L† M )( µ L† ) = 1 2 (−µ L )( −µ2 + LL† −L†µ + M L† ) = 1 2 (−µ L )( 1 0 ) = − 1 2 µ. (C21) 45 Example 16 (1-magnetic monopole) . For n = 1 , ˆM that satisﬁes the constraints is given e.g., by ˆM = (√ 1 − a2 ai ) (|a| < 1). (C22) In fact, (i...

2017

[6] [6]

Gell-Mann, A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons, Phys

M. Gell-Mann, A Schematic Model of Baryons and Mesons, Phys. Lett. 8, 214–215 (1964). G. Zweig, An SU(3) Model for Strong Interaction Sym- metry and its Breaking, CERN Report No.8182/TH.401 (1964)

1964

[7] [7]

Nambu, Strings, monopoles, and gauge ﬁelds, Phys

Y. Nambu, Strings, monopoles, and gauge ﬁelds, Phys. Rev. D 10, 4262–4268 (1974). G. ’t Hooft, in: High Energy Physics, edited by A. Zichichi (Editorice Compositori, Bologna, 1975). S. Mandelstam, Vortices and quark conﬁnement in non-abelian gauge theories, Phys. Report 23, 245–249 (1976)

1974

[8] [8]

Polyakov, Compact gauge ﬁelds and the infrared catastrophe, Phys

A.M. Polyakov, Compact gauge ﬁelds and the infrared catastrophe, Phys. Lett. B 59, 82–84 (1975)

1975