Recognition: unknown
Generating Project-Specific Test Cases with Requirement Validation Intention
read the original abstract
Test cases are valuable assets for maintaining software quality. State-of-the-art automated test generation techniques typically focus on maximizing program branch coverage or translating focal methods into test code. However, in contrast to branch coverage or code-to-test translation, practical tests are written out of the need to validate whether a requirement has been fulfilled. Specifically, each test usually reflects a developer's validation intention for a program function, regarding (1) what is the test scenario of a program function? and (2) what is expected behavior under such a scenario? Without taking such intention into account, generated tests are less likely to be adopted in practice. In this work, we propose IntentionTest, which generates project-specific tests given the description of validation intention. IntentionTest adopts a retrieval-and-edit manner. First, given a focal code and a description of validation intention consisting of a test objective with test precondition and expected results, IntentionTest retrieves a reusable test in the project as the test reference. Then, IntentionTest edits the test reference with an LLM regarding the validation intention toward the target test. We extensively evaluate IntentionTest against four baselines on 3,680 test cases. Compared to state-of-the-art baselines, IntentionTest can (1) generate tests far more semantically relevant to ground-truth tests by (i) killing 28.1% to 37.6% more common mutants and (ii) sharing 16.9% to 23.9% more common coverage; and (2) generate 23.7% to 49.0% more successful passing tests.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Generalizing Test Cases for Comprehensive Test Scenario Coverage
TestGeneralizer generalizes an initial test into a set of executable tests covering more diverse scenarios, delivering +31.66% mutation-based and +23.08% LLM-assessed scenario coverage gains over ChatTester on 12 open...
-
ARuleCon: Agentic Security Rule Conversion
ARuleCon uses AI agents plus execution-based checks to convert SIEM rules across vendors with 15% higher fidelity than standard LLM translation.
-
Learning Project-wise Subsequent Code Edits via Interleaving Neural-based Induction and Tool-based Deduction
TRACE improves project-wise subsequent code editing by interleaving neural-based induction for semantic edits and tool-based deduction for syntactic edits.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.