Sliding Engineering Spin-Valley-Layer Coupling and Altermagnetism in Bilayer Antiferromagnetic Honeycomb Lattices

Li Huang; Wen-Xin Jiang; Yuantao Chen; Zhen-Hao Gong; Zhigang Gui

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 13 references

Sliding Engineering Spin-Valley-Layer Coupling and Altermagnetism in Bilayer Antiferromagnetic Honeycomb Lattices

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Sliding the layers of bilayer MnPTe3 between AB and BA stacking reverses not just the electric polarization but also the valley order, the spin splitting, and the sign of the anomalous Hall response.

desk verdict A solid, potentially important computational proposal for sliding-controlled valley-spin-layer locking in 2D AFM bilayers; the central switch is plausible and well-documented at one Hubbard U, but the lack of U-dependence and the fitted-model framing keep me from fully endorsing the quantitative claims. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.20690 v2 pith:ACD6JLYE submitted 2025-07-28 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Wen-Xin Jiang , Zhen-Hao Gong , Yuantao Chen , Zhigang Gui , Li Huang This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords valleypolarizationaltermagnetismslidingferroelectricitybilayerMnPTe3spin-valleylockinganomalousHalleffectk·pmodelmagnetoelectriccoupling

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes a general design for coupling ferroelectricity to both valley polarization and altermagnetism in bilayer antiferromagnetic honeycomb lattices, and validates it with first-principles calculations on bilayer MnPTe$_3$. It shows that sliding the two layers between AB and BA stacking reverses the out-of-plane electric polarization, and that the same sliding step inverts both the layer-resolved valley polarization and the momentum-dependent spin splitting while keeping their magnitudes. Because the reversal is nonvolatile and does not move any magnetic moment, one mechanical manipulation rewrites the spin, valley, and layer order at once. The authors argue that this yields a switchable layer- and spin-locked anomalous valley Hall effect and an altermagnetic magnetoelectric response, providing a route to electrically programmable valleytronic and spintronic devices.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is a four-band spinful $k\cdot p$ Hamiltonian for the bilayer, built from two layer-resolved honeycomb Dirac models coupled by a weak interlayer hopping. Each layer carries a mass term that opens the gap, a spin-splitting term proportional to $k_y$ that encodes the altermagnetic texture, spin-valley coupling terms with layer-dependent coefficients, and half the electrostatic potential difference between layers. The upper layer is related to the lower by a $C_{2z}$ rotation, and the model shows that reversing the electric polarization flips the sign of the layer-dependent couplings, which inverts the valley splitting and the spin texture while leaving their magnitudes unchanged. The symmetry condition that makes the mechanism work is that the polar stacking breaks $PT$ but keeps a vertical mirror connecting the two magnetic sublattices; that is what allows altermagnetic spin splitting with zero net magnetization.

What would settle it

A decisive check would be to recompute bilayer MnPTe$_3$ with Hubbard $U$ values from about 3 to 7 eV and see whether the 22.3 meV valley splitting and the anomalous Hall sign reversal survive; alternatively, an experiment that slides between AB and BA stacking and finds no reversal of the valley-selective optical response or of the anomalous Hall conductivity near the conduction band edge would contradict the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In an intralayer antiferromagnet arranged as a honeycomb bilayer, the authors claim that polar stacking does three linked jobs at once: it produces a spontaneous out-of-plane electric polarization, it lifts the $K$/$K'$ valley degeneracy through layer-dependent electrostatic and spin-orbit terms, and it breaks the combined time-reversal and inversion ($PT$) symmetry that keeps the monolayer spin-degenerate while preserving a vertical mirror that connects opposite-spin sublattices, which creates altermagnetism. The central result is that sliding between AB and BA stacking reverses the polarization and, with it, simultaneously inverts both the valley polarization and the spin polarization while preserving the size of the splittings. In bilayer MnPTe$_3$ this appears as a 22.3 meV conduction-band valley splitting whose valley order exchanges $K'\leftrightarrow K$, an emergent spin splitting at the valley edges with opposite spin character for the two stackings, opposite-sign Berry curvatures, and a sign-reversing anomalous Hall conductivity near the conduction band minimum. The same mechanism is argued to be general for intralayer antiferromagnetic honeycomb bilayers with the required mirror symmetry, with strained bilayer CrCl$_3$ given as a second example.

Load-bearing premise

Every quantitative prediction for MnPTe$_3$ rests on density functional calculations with a fixed Hubbard $U$ of 5.0 eV on manganese and 3.0 eV on chromium, and the paper does not test how the results change with $U$, so the exact splitting sizes and Berry curvature values could shift even though the reversal under sliding is symmetry-protected.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

In bilayer MnPTe$_3$, sliding from AB to BA stacking reverses the ferroelectric polarization, swaps the $K'$ and $K$ valley order of the 22.3 meV conduction-band splitting, and flips the spin polarization at the band edges while preserving splitting magnitudes.
The anomalous Hall conductivity changes sign when the stacking changes, so the layer- and spin-locked anomalous valley Hall effect is nonvolatile and electrically switchable by sliding.
The altermagnetic magnetoelectric effect switches spin splitting by reversing polarization rather than rotating magnetic moments, offering an energy-efficient route to spin control in antiferromagnets.
The design principle is presented as general: strained bilayer CrCl$_3$ is given as a weak-spin-orbit example where the same sliding mechanism reverses a 4 meV valley polarization with layer exchange.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural extension the paper leaves implicit is that other intralayer antiferromagnetic honeycomb bilayers with the same surviving vertical mirror should show the same simultaneous reversal, making the MPX$_3$ family a wider test bed than the two compounds computed here.
Because the reversal is a rigid interlayer slide with a 71.5 meV barrier rather than an ionic displacement, it may be drivable by an atomic-force tip or by an in-plane electric field at feasible force scales, but the paper does not simulate device cycling or critical fields.
The polarization-controlled spin splitting away from $K$ suggests that the same switch could gate spin currents in the valence band, not only the anomalous valley Hall response at the conduction band edge; this is an untested consequence of the computed band structure.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper gives a compact, physically transparent route to controlling valley, spin, and layer simultaneously through interlayer sliding in an intralayer AFM honeycomb bilayer. In bilayer MnPTe3 the effect shows up cleanly in DFT: flipping AB to BA stacking inverts both the layer-resolved valley splitting and the altermagnetic spin splitting, and the anomalous Hall conductivity reverses sign. The four-band k·p model is minimal, and the symmetry logic is clean—polar stacking breaks PT, leaving a mirror that connects opposite spin sublattices, which yields altermagnetic splitting and FE-valley locking in one go.

What is genuinely new is the combination. Earlier work did FE-valley coupling in sliding bilayers and FE-switchable altermagnetism separately; I don't know of a prior paper that puts layer-resolved valley polarization and altermagnetic spin splitting under the same sliding switch. The AVHE switch follows naturally, and the supporting strained CrCl3 calculation broadens the claim to a general design principle. The DFT is careful: Berry curvature is cross-checked with VASPBERRY, AHC with WannierTools, and the citations are appropriate and current.

Soft spots, in order. First, no Hubbard U sensitivity test. The weak/strong SOC boundary in the model sits about 0.10 eV away in fitted-parameter space, and those parameters can move by tens of meV with U. The direct DFT at the chosen U already shows the reversal, so this is a robustness question, not a refutation, but a U sweep would settle it. Second, the k·p model is fitted to the same bands it then reproduces; the analytical valley-splitting formula is a restatement of fitted parameters, not a prediction. The independent evidence is the DFT itself and the WannierTools AHC, not the model. Third, the novelty is slightly oversold—"unprecedented" is too strong given refs 40/41/43/44 on stacking-switchable altermagnets; the layer-resolved locking is a real step beyond, and that is enough. Minor: a few typos ("stable stable", "seperated") and some prose that could be tightened.

For people working on 2D magnets, valleytronics, or sliding ferroelectricity, this paper is worth a careful read. The central qualitative result looks sound, the data presentation is solid, and a revision that adds U-dependence and dials back the abstract would make me comfortable publishing it. Send it to a serious referee.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a four-band spin-full k·p model for bilayer antiferromagnetic honeycomb lattices in which interlayer sliding reverses the ferroelectric polarization and simultaneously inverts layer-resolved valley polarization and altermagnetic spin splitting. The proposal is validated in bilayer MnPTe3 by first-principles calculations, which show a 22.3 meV valley splitting, layer-selective conduction band minima, spin-valley-layer locking, and sign-reversing Berry curvature and anomalous Hall conductivity between AB and BA stackings. The authors also describe a strong-SOC regime in which layer-selective control is lost, and they generalize the idea to strained bilayer CrCl3.

Significance. If the qualitative reversal is robust, the work offers a concrete route to electrically programmable valleytronic, spintronic, and layertronic functionality in a single 2D antiferromagnet. The paper combines a transparent model, direct DFT evidence of the AB/BA inversion, and independent transport calculations with VASPBERRY and WannierTools. The principal weakness is that the central claim is demonstrated at a single Hubbard-U value and the k·p model is fitted to the same DFT bands it later 'reproduces'; still, the core qualitative observation—the simultaneous inversion under sliding—is directly visible in the DFT band structures, so the claim does not rest solely on the model.

major comments (4)

[Computational details; Fig. 3; Table S1] The central claim that polarization reversal inverts both layer-resolved valley polarization and altermagnetic spin splitting is demonstrated only for fixed Hubbard-U parameters (U=5.0 eV for Mn, 3.0 eV for Cr). The model's strong/weak SOC boundary is set by λ+ϕ−λ′−ϕ′ = 2UE; for AB stacking the fitted parameters give λ+ϕ−λ′−ϕ′ ≈ −0.024 eV versus 2UE = 0.080 eV, a margin of about 0.10 eV for the conduction band and an even smaller margin for the valence band. Since U controls d-electron localization, the band gap, and the spin-valley couplings, a U-dependence study (for example, U = 3–7 eV for Mn) is needed to confirm that the system remains in the weak-SOC regime and that the valley/spin inversion persists. Without such tests, the title and abstract claims are contingent on a single DFT setup.
[Four-band k·p model; Fig. 4; Table S1] The k·p parameters are obtained by fitting the same DFT bands that the model is then used to reproduce, so the quantitative 'predictions'—the valley-splitting formula −λ−ϕ+λ′+ϕ′+2UE and the Berry-curvature distribution—are not independent validations. The independent evidence for the reversal is the direct DFT comparison in Fig. 3; the model serves an interpretive role. The authors should state this explicitly, or alternatively fit the model to one stacking and predict the other, to avoid overstating the model's predictive power.
[Abstract; Introduction; Section on model A] The strong-SOC regime is described only in words and with a reference to Fig. S5; the main text does not derive from Eqs. (1)–(2) how 'band extrema remain locked to specific valleys regardless of polarization direction' while 'valley polarization persists.' This is a load-bearing distinction because it defines the regime in which the central layer-selective inversion is lost. The authors should either provide a short derivation in the main text or move the relevant figure and its explanation into the Results section, so that readers can verify the claimed behavior.
[Abstract] The phrase 'unprecedented magnetoelectric response in 2D antiferromagnets' is too strong given recent works (Refs. 40, 41, 43, 44) that already propose ferroelectric-switchable altermagnetism and magnetoelectric coupling in 2D antiferromagnets. The actual novelty is the simultaneous, layer-resolved control of valley and spin polarization, which should be stated more precisely without claiming overall uniqueness.

minor comments (6)

[Abstract; Introduction] Several typos appear: 'oﬀering unique opportunities' in the abstract and 'veratile' in the Introduction; also 'seperated' in the Results section.
[Eq. (1)] The term δσ0τ0szky is described as 'spin splitting (keeping the lowest order) without SOC', yet it is proportional to sz. Clarify that this term arises from the altermagnetic order that breaks PT symmetry, not from spin-orbit coupling.
[Fig. 3 caption] The numbers '22.3 meV' and '18.0 meV' appear in the caption without labels; specify which quantity each refers to (for example, CBM valley splitting and VBM valley splitting for AB stacking).
[Fig. 4(e)] The anomalous Hall conductivity is plotted in units of S/cm; for a 2D system, the more standard unit is S (2D conductance). If S/cm is used, state the thickness normalization used to convert from the 2D calculation.
[Table S1] The table caption does not give units for vf; from the Hamiltonian the Fermi velocity is in units of eV·Å (since k is in Å⁻¹). Add this to the caption.
[Results; Fig. 2] The energy barrier for sliding is reported as 71.5 meV; it would be useful to state whether this is per formula unit or per unit cell, and to specify the precise sliding path between AB and BA.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central sliding-induced reversal is established by direct DFT and symmetry analysis, and the fitted k·p model is not used as an independent predictive source for that claim.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that interlayer sliding between AB and BA stackings simultaneously inverts ferroelectric polarization, layer-resolved valley polarization, and altermagnetic spin splitting—is demonstrated directly by first-principles DFT band structures (Figs. 3 and 5), not derived from the fitted parameters. The k·p model is explicitly presented as a fitting/interpolation tool: 'Our parameterized k·p model, carefully fitted to DFT results near the Fermi level at the K and K′ points (Table S1), well reproduces the spin-split band structure (Fig. 4).' The valley-splitting expression −λ−ϕ+λ′+ϕ′+2UE is a restatement of the model Hamiltonian's eigenevalues with parameters fitted to the same DFT, but the paper does not present these magnitudes as first-principles predictions; the qualitative reversal is a symmetry consequence of the C2z-related layer Hamiltonians and is confirmed independently by DFT. Berry curvature from the fitted model is cross-checked by 'independent VASPberry calculations (Fig. S3 in Supporting Information)', and the anomalous Hall conductivity is evaluated separately via WannierTools. The self-citations that appear (e.g., refs. 29 and 42) are contextual and not load-bearing: no uniqueness theorem or unverified prior result is invoked to forbid alternatives. The fixed Hubbard-U values are a parameter-choice sensitivity issue relevant to correctness, not a circularity: the qualitative inversion is protected by stacking symmetry and does not reduce to the fitted parameters. Therefore no step exhibits self-definition, fitted-input-called-prediction, or self-citation load-bearing reduction.

Assumptions & free parameters 11 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model has 10 k·p parameters fitted to the DFT band structure plus a hand-chosen Hubbard U; these are the adjustable inputs that carry the quantitative content. No new physical entities are introduced. The axioms are standard DFT assumptions and symmetry approximations.

free parameters (11)

vf (Fermi velocity) = 2.16 eV·Å (AB and BA)
Fitted to DFT band slopes near K; enters the kinetic term of the k·p model.
m (mass/gap) = 0.4210 eV (AB), 0.4108 eV (BA)
Fitted to DFT gap; controls the band gap in the model.
λ_c (spin-valley coupling, lower layer, conduction) = 0.0408 eV (AB), 0.0680 eV (BA)
Fitted to DFT; sets the spin-valley splitting in the conduction band.
λ'_c (upper layer, conduction) = 0.0650 eV (AB), 0.0430 eV (BA)
Fitted to DFT; layer-dependent spin-valley coupling in conduction band.
λ_v (spin-valley coupling, lower layer, valence) = 0.0100 eV (AB), 0.0080 eV (BA)
Fitted to DFT; valence band counterpart of λ_c.
λ'_v (upper layer, valence) = 0.0073 eV (AB), 0.0100 eV (BA)
Fitted to DFT; layer-dependent valence coupling.
ϕ (inversion-breaking spin-valley coupling, lower layer) = 0.0060 eV (AB), -0.0060 eV (BA)
Fitted to DFT; sign change between stackings drives the FE coupling in the model.
ϕ' (upper layer) = 0.0060 eV (AB), -0.0060 eV (BA)
Fitted to DFT; sign change between stackings, mirroring ϕ.
δ (altermagnetic spin-splitting coefficient) = -0.0100 eV (both stackings)
Fitted to DFT spin splitting; generates the momentum-linear altermagnetic spin texture.
U_E (interlayer electrostatic potential difference) = 0.0400 eV (AB), -0.0400 eV (BA)
Fitted to DFT; represents half the potential difference from out-of-plane dipoles.
Hubbard U = 5.0 eV (Mn), 3.0 eV (Cr)
Chosen from prior literature and applied in PBE+U; not fitted here but controls all quantitative band features.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption PBE+U with the chosen U values adequately captures the ground state and band structure of MnPTe3 and CrCl3.
All quantitative results rely on this; no U-dependence tests are shown.
domain assumption Monolayer MnPTe3 is an intralayer Néel antiferromagnet with PT symmetry and a 103.6 meV valley splitting, as previously reported.
The bilayer design builds on this monolayer property.
domain assumption The interlayer hopping H⊥ is negligible compared to the intralayer terms.
Invoked when defining the block-diagonal bilayer Hamiltonian; justified by weak vdW interactions.
standard math The k·p expansion around K/K′ with leading-order momentum terms is sufficient to describe the low-energy physics.
Standard low-energy approximation; all fitted quantities are near the K points.
standard math The mirror-symmetry analysis in the SI correctly identifies the allowed leading-order spin textures.
Group-theoretic argument used to justify the δ term in the model.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sliding Engineering Spin-Valley-Layer Coupling and Altermagnetism in Bilayer Antiferromagnetic Honeycomb Lattices." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ACD6JLYE

@misc{pith2026250720690,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sliding Engineering Spin-Valley-Layer Coupling and Altermagnetism in Bilayer Antiferromagnetic Honeycomb Lattices},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ACD6JLYE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.20690}
}

abstract

Valley polarization and altermagnetism are two emerging fundamental phenomena in condensed matter physics, offering unprecedented opportunites for information encoding and processing in novel energy-efficient devices. By coupling valley and spin degrees of freedom with ferroic orders such as ferroelectricity, nonvolatile memory functionalities can be achieved. Here, we propose a way to realize ferroelectric-valley (FE-valley) and FE-altermagnetic coupling in a bilayer antiferromagnetic (AFM) honeycomb lattices based on an effective four-band spin-full $k\cdot p$ model. Our proposal is validated in bilayer MnPTe$_3$ through first-principles calculations. A spontaneous out-of-plane electric polarization occurs in AB- (BA-) stacking configuration, which is reversibly switchable via interlayer sliding. Remarkably, polarization reversal simultaneously inverts both layer-resolved valley polarization and altermagnetic spin splitting. This dual control enables tunable layer-spin-locked anomalous valley Hall effects and an unprecedented magnetoelectric response in 2D antiferromagnets. Our work establishes a general paradigm for electrically programmable valleytronic and spintronic functionalities of 2D AFM materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.20690 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Stacking-dependent ferroelectricity in bilayer MnPTe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Layer-projected electronic structure of bilayer MnPTe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Electronic structure and topological transport properties of bilayer MnPTe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: (a)-(b) Band structures of AB- and BA-stacked bilayer MnPTe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

13 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

[1]

Valley-contrasting physics in graphene: magnetic moment and topological transport

(1) Xiao, D.; Yao, W.; Niu, Q. Valley-contrasting physics in graphene: magnetic moment and topological transport. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 99, 236809. (2) Yao, W.; Xiao, D.; Niu, Q. Valley-dependent optoelectronics from inversion symmetry breaking. Phys. Rev. B 2008, 77, 235406. (3) Xiao, D.; Liu, G.-B.; Feng, W.; Xu, X.; Yao, W. Coupled Spin and Valley Phy...

work page 2007
[2]

Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 125, 247601. 17 (27) Zhang, T.; Xu, X.; Huang, B.; Dai, Y.; Ma, Y. 2D spontaneous valley polarization from inversion symmetric single-layer lattices. npj Comput. Mater. 2022, 8,

work page 2020
[3]

Phys. Rev. B 2023, 107, 035139. 20 (55) Huang, C.; Du, Y.; Wu, H.; Xiang, H.; Deng, K.; Kan, E. Prediction of intrinsic ferromagnetic ferroelectricity in a transition-metal halide monolayer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 120, 147601. (56) Xue, F.; Hou, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wu, R. Two-dimensional ferromagnetic van der Waals CrCl3 monolayer with enhanced anisotropy and C...

work page 2023
[6]

(23) Shen, X.-W.; Tong, W.-Y.; Gong, S.-J.; Duan, C.-G

Nanoscale 2019, 11, 5163–5170. (23) Shen, X.-W.; Tong, W.-Y.; Gong, S.-J.; Duan, C.-G. Electrically tunable polarizer based on 2D orthorhombic ferrovalley materials. 2D Mater. 2017, 5, 011001. (24) Xiao, C.; Wang, F.; Yang, S. A.; Lu, Y.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, S. Elemental ferroelectricity and antiferroelectricity in Group-V monolayer. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018,...

work page 2019
[7]

Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022, 128, 197202. (32) Lee, S.; Lee, S.; Jung, S.; Jung, J.; Kim, D.; Lee, Y.; Seok, B.; Kim, J.; Park, B. G.; Šmejkal, L.; others Broken Kramers degeneracy in altermagnetic MnTe. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2024, 132, 036702. (33) Mazin, I. Altermagnetism in MnTe: Origin, predicted manifestations, and routes to detwinning. Phys. Rev. B 2023, 107, ...

work page 2022
[64]

Coexisting ferroelectric and ferrovalley polarizations in bilayer stacked magnetic semiconductors

(28) Wu, Y.; Tong, J.; Deng, L.; Luo, F.; Tian, F.; Qin, G.; Zhang, X. Coexisting ferroelectric and ferrovalley polarizations in bilayer stacked magnetic semiconductors. Nano Lett. 2023, 23, 6226–6232. (29) Gui, Z.; Huang, L. Stacking ferroelectricity in two-dimensional van der Waals materials. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2025, 37, 113005. (30) Šmejkal, L.; ...

work page 2023
[122]

Semiconductor spintron- ics

(47) Fabian, J.; Matos-Abiague, A.; Ertler, C.; Stano, P.; Žutić, I. Semiconductor spintron- ics. Acta Phys. Slovaca 2007, 57, 565–907. (48) Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 50, 17953. (49) Kresse, G.; Furthmüller, J.; Hafner, J. Theory of the crystal structures of selenium and tellurium: the eﬀect of generalized-gradient ...

work page 2007
[132]

Triferroic Material and Electrical Control of Valley Degree of Freedom

(17) Pei, Q.; Zhou, B.; Mi, W.; Cheng, Y. Triferroic Material and Electrical Control of Valley Degree of Freedom. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 12675–12682. (18) Hu, H.; Tong, W.-Y.; Shen, Y.-H.; Duan, C.-G. Electrical control of the valley degree 16 of freedom in 2D ferroelectric/antiferromagnetic heterostructures. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 8098...

work page 2019

Show all 13 references

[416]

A.; Yates, J

(60) Mostoﬁ, A. A.; Yates, J. R.; Pizzi, G.; Lee, Y.-S.; Souza, I.; Vanderbilt, D.; Marzari, N. An updated version of wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised Wannier functions. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2014, 185, 2309 –

2014
[1442]

(38) Zeng, M.; Zhu, M.-Y.; Zhu, Y.-P.; Liu, X.-R.; Ma, X.-M.; Hao, Y.-J.; Liu, P.; Qu, G.; Yang, Y.; Jiang, Z.; others Observation of Spin Splitting in Room-Temperature Metallic Antiferromagnet CrSb. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, 2406529. (39) Pan, B.; Zhou, P.; Lyu, P.; Xiao, H.; Yang,...

2024
[1758]

L.; Park, Y.; Lee, D.; Han, M.; MacDonald, A

(53) Chittari, B. L.; Park, Y.; Lee, D.; Han, M.; MacDonald, A. H.; Hwang, E.; Jung, J. Electronic and magnetic properties of single-layer MPX 3 metal phosphorous trichalco- genides. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 94, 184428. (54) Zhou, W.; Zheng, G.; Li, A.; Zhang, D.; Ouyang, F. Orbital...

2016
[2116]

(37) Yang, G.; Li, Z.; Yang, S.; Li, J.; Zheng, H.; Zhu, W.; Pan, Z.; Xu, Y.; Cao, S.; Zhao, W.; others Three-dimensional mapping of the altermagnetic spin splitting in CrSb. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16,

2025
[3865]

From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented- wave method

(52) Kresse, G.; Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented- wave method. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59,

1999

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Valley-contrasting physics in graphene: magnetic moment and topological transport

(1) Xiao, D.; Yao, W.; Niu, Q. Valley-contrasting physics in graphene: magnetic moment and topological transport. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 99, 236809. (2) Yao, W.; Xiao, D.; Niu, Q. Valley-dependent optoelectronics from inversion symmetry breaking. Phys. Rev. B 2008, 77, 235406. (3) Xiao, D.; Liu, G.-B.; Feng, W.; Xu, X.; Yao, W. Coupled Spin and Valley Phy...

work page 2007

[2] [2]

Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 125, 247601. 17 (27) Zhang, T.; Xu, X.; Huang, B.; Dai, Y.; Ma, Y. 2D spontaneous valley polarization from inversion symmetric single-layer lattices. npj Comput. Mater. 2022, 8,

work page 2020

[3] [3]

Phys. Rev. B 2023, 107, 035139. 20 (55) Huang, C.; Du, Y.; Wu, H.; Xiang, H.; Deng, K.; Kan, E. Prediction of intrinsic ferromagnetic ferroelectricity in a transition-metal halide monolayer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 120, 147601. (56) Xue, F.; Hou, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wu, R. Two-dimensional ferromagnetic van der Waals CrCl3 monolayer with enhanced anisotropy and C...

work page 2023

[4] [6]

(23) Shen, X.-W.; Tong, W.-Y.; Gong, S.-J.; Duan, C.-G

Nanoscale 2019, 11, 5163–5170. (23) Shen, X.-W.; Tong, W.-Y.; Gong, S.-J.; Duan, C.-G. Electrically tunable polarizer based on 2D orthorhombic ferrovalley materials. 2D Mater. 2017, 5, 011001. (24) Xiao, C.; Wang, F.; Yang, S. A.; Lu, Y.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, S. Elemental ferroelectricity and antiferroelectricity in Group-V monolayer. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018,...

work page 2019

[5] [7]

Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022, 128, 197202. (32) Lee, S.; Lee, S.; Jung, S.; Jung, J.; Kim, D.; Lee, Y.; Seok, B.; Kim, J.; Park, B. G.; Šmejkal, L.; others Broken Kramers degeneracy in altermagnetic MnTe. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2024, 132, 036702. (33) Mazin, I. Altermagnetism in MnTe: Origin, predicted manifestations, and routes to detwinning. Phys. Rev. B 2023, 107, ...

work page 2022

[6] [64]

Coexisting ferroelectric and ferrovalley polarizations in bilayer stacked magnetic semiconductors

(28) Wu, Y.; Tong, J.; Deng, L.; Luo, F.; Tian, F.; Qin, G.; Zhang, X. Coexisting ferroelectric and ferrovalley polarizations in bilayer stacked magnetic semiconductors. Nano Lett. 2023, 23, 6226–6232. (29) Gui, Z.; Huang, L. Stacking ferroelectricity in two-dimensional van der Waals materials. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2025, 37, 113005. (30) Šmejkal, L.; ...

work page 2023

[7] [122]

Semiconductor spintron- ics

(47) Fabian, J.; Matos-Abiague, A.; Ertler, C.; Stano, P.; Žutić, I. Semiconductor spintron- ics. Acta Phys. Slovaca 2007, 57, 565–907. (48) Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 50, 17953. (49) Kresse, G.; Furthmüller, J.; Hafner, J. Theory of the crystal structures of selenium and tellurium: the eﬀect of generalized-gradient ...

work page 2007

[8] [132]

Triferroic Material and Electrical Control of Valley Degree of Freedom

(17) Pei, Q.; Zhou, B.; Mi, W.; Cheng, Y. Triferroic Material and Electrical Control of Valley Degree of Freedom. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 12675–12682. (18) Hu, H.; Tong, W.-Y.; Shen, Y.-H.; Duan, C.-G. Electrical control of the valley degree 16 of freedom in 2D ferroelectric/antiferromagnetic heterostructures. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 8098...

work page 2019