Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 183 references

Beyond Classical Models: Statistical Physics Tools for the Analysis of Time Series in Modern Air Transport

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This review argues that statistical physics tools—from probability distributions to chaos metrics—can recover the hidden micro-rules of air-traffic dynamics from coarse-grained time series such as average delays.

desk verdict A useful pedagogical review of statistical physics for aviation researchers, but its fractality claims are internally inconsistent and need major revision before acceptance. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.20927 v1 pith:IJ57T2TJ submitted 2025-07-28 physics.data-an physics.soc-ph

Felipe Olivares , Massimiliano Zanin This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.data-anphysics.soc-ph
keywords airtransporttimeseriesanalysisstatisticalphysicsentropymultifractalityLyapunovexponentcorrelationdimensiondelaypropagation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is a review aimed at aeronautics researchers, making the case that tools developed in statistical physics can recover the microscopic rules of air transport from coarse-grained time series such as hourly average delays. It walks through four families of tools—empirical probability distributions, entropy-based disorder metrics, fractal and multifractal analysis, and nonlinear-dynamics measures like the largest Lyapunov exponent and correlation dimension—and surveys evidence that air-traffic data are non-Gaussian, long-range correlated, multifractal, and in some settings chaotic. The payoff the authors want to establish is practical: if delays carry memory and nonlinear structure, then Gaussian random models and naive Poisson approximations are insufficient, and forecasting, simulation, and efficiency metrics should be built on the statistical-physics description instead.

What carries the argument

The machinery is an inverse statistical-physics pipeline: infer micro-scale rules from macro-scale observables, implemented as a progression of tools. At the core is the scaling identity $F(s) \propto s^{H}$ that defines the Hurst exponent $H$, and its multifractal generalization $h(q)$ via Multifractal Detrended Fluctuation Analysis; around it sit Shannon and permutation entropies for disorder, and the largest Lyapunov exponent and correlation dimension $D_2$ for nonlinear dynamics. The load-bearing identity is the relation between the fluctuation function's power-law slope and memory: $H > 1/2$ means persistent clustering, $H = 1/2$ means memoryless noise, and a $q$-dependent spectrum $h(q)$ means multifractality. Each tool is introduced with definitions aimed at readers who are not physicists.

What would settle it

Take the same airport delay and landing-interval series, remove the daily and weekly cycles, and then recompute the memory exponents on shuffled surrogates that keep the heavy tails but destroy correlations; the central claim would collapse if the detrended exponents all revert to $1/2$ and the multifractal spectra match the surrogates. A second decisive check: if Lyapunov exponents estimated from the same traffic volumes flip sign under standard embedding-parameter choices, the chaos claim is not stable.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the review's central claim is that a coherent conceptual ladder exists for analysing air-transport time series and that each rung has already yielded replicable findings. The empirical distribution is the zero-th step: departure and arrival delays are skewed, heavy-tailed, and better described by q-exponentials, truncated power laws, or Student's t than by Gaussians. Entropy-based metrics quantify unpredictability and reveal characteristic temporal scales, such as the periodic daily clockwork of airport traffic visible as drops in multiscale permutation entropy. Fractal analysis with Detrended Fluctuation Analysis and its multifractal extension finds Hurst exponents above $1/2$ in delay, landing-interval, and traffic-volume series, indicating persistent clustering; and Lyapunov exponents and correlation dimensions estimated from en-route and arrival volumes point to low-dimensional chaos, meaning short-term forecasts are possible but long-term ones are not. The review also states the correctives: daily oscillations can inflate Hurst exponents, heavy tails can bias scaling estimates, and entropy is not the same as complexity.

Load-bearing premise

The whole synthesis depends on the assumption that the numbers extracted from the data—the memory exponents, the multifractal widths, and the chaos indicators—reflect the real behaviour of air traffic and are not artefacts of daily cycles, extreme-value outliers, or short records.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the reviewed results hold, delay distributions at major airports should not be treated as Gaussian: heavy tails, q-exponential decay, and truncated power laws become the empirical benchmarks, and models that ignore them will misestimate the probability of large delays.
  • Hurst exponents above $1/2$ in delay and flow series imply that congestion is persistent: a busy hour tends to be followed by a busy hour, so scheduling and recovery strategies should exploit this memory rather than assume independent arrivals.
  • Positive Lyapunov exponents reported for en-route and arrival traffic volumes imply a practical forecasting horizon: short-term prediction is feasible, but long-term deterministic prediction is not.
  • Because daily oscillations and heavy tails can inflate or corrupt scaling estimates, Hurst and multifractal measurements in air transport should be paired with detrending of periodic components and surrogate tests.
  • The metrics are not interchangeable: entropy, fractality, and chaos probes answer different questions, and a holistic combination—such as entropy planes plus irreversibility—is the intended route to operational insight.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Going beyond the paper: the same four-rung ladder could be turned into a cross-modal diagnostic—if rail, maritime, or pedestrian flow series also show $H > 1/2$ and q-exponential tails, the same non-Gaussian, memory-based modelling principles should apply there.
  • Going beyond the paper: the drops in multiscale permutation entropy that the reviewed studies find at characteristic lags could be monitored in real time as a health check; a sudden shift in the location or depth of those minima would flag a change in an airport's internal scheduling clockwork before delay statistics worsen.
  • Going beyond the paper: because irreversibility in landing intervals concentrates near the runway, a testable extension is to compare airports with different sequencing procedures—tighter procedural constraints should produce measurably stronger time asymmetry if the mechanism is procedural rather than weather-driven.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a review of statistical-physics tools applied to air-transport time series, organized as a progression from empirical probability distributions, to entropy-based metrics, to fractal/multifractal analysis, and finally to nonlinear-dynamics indicators (largest Lyapunov exponent and correlation dimension). Each methodological section is followed by a table of selected applications and a short 'lessons learned' discussion; the final section sketches future directions such as spectral analysis, phase transitions, time irreversibility, universality classes, and ergodicity. The stated aim is to make these tools accessible to aeronautics researchers and to argue that air-traffic time series exhibit properties (long-range correlations, multifractality, chaos) that traditional Gaussian/Poisson models cannot capture.

Significance. The paper fills a real gap: there is no up-to-date, pedagogically oriented review of statistical-physics time-series methods for the ATM community, and the authors correctly emphasize that entropy is not complexity and that detrended fluctuation analysis is sensitive to trends and heavy tails. The systematic tables of applications and the balanced discussion of contradictory results in the literature (e.g., Lyapunov exponents, delay distribution families) are useful. However, the review's central claim—that air-traffic data are genuinely multifractal or chaotic and that models must incorporate these properties—rests on empirical studies that are not critically vetted against the review's own caveats in §4.3 and §5.3. In addition, a notable fraction of the cited applications are the authors' own works (Refs [61], [62], [67], [100], [101]), and the manuscript does not flag this self-citation pattern or provide independent corroboration. The review is therefore valuable as an introduction, but its synthetic conclusions need revision before the paper can serve as a reliable reference.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.2–§4.3, Table 3] The review's positive synthesis for long-range correlations and multifractality rests on the empirical studies in Table 3, but §4.3 concedes that oscillatory daily trends can artificially inflate H and 'mimic multifractality and falsely suggest long-range correlations' (Refs [134,135]), and that heavy tails can bias H (Ref [137]). The review never reports whether any of the Table 3 studies removed the daily cycle, used surrogate data, or otherwise controlled for these confounds. Because §1.2 states that these properties are 'fundamentally incompatible with traditional Gaussian random models' and that models 'must incorporate such properties', the empirical footing of the central claim is not established. The authors should either add a critical assessment of each reported H and multifractal spectrum against the §4.3 caveats, or explicitly restrict the scope of their claim.
  2. [§4.2, Ref. [62]] The text describes Ref. [62] as having 'found a bifractal nature' in landing-interval data at Frankfurt, Heathrow, and Tegel. The title of that reference, 'Corrupted bifractal features in finite uncorrelated power-law distributed data', indicates that its main message is the opposite: bifractal signatures can be corrupted artifacts of finite heavy-tailed noise. Unless the empirical airport results in [62] are shown to be immune to the corruption mechanism, citing it as evidence for genuine bifractality is misleading. Please clarify what [62] actually established and, if necessary, re-classify it as a cautionary reference.
  3. [§5.2–§5.3, Table 4] The review reports contradictory findings for the largest Lyapunov exponent: positive values in Refs [143–145] and zero in Ref [146], with the discrepancy attributed to temporal resolution. Given §5.3's own warning that LLE estimation 'represents a challenging task' and that noise, finite length, and low resolution can lead to 'a wrong classification', the review should state which of these studies (if any) applied the recommended robustness checks (e.g., surrogate data or multiple embedding parameters) before presenting the positive LLE as evidence of chaos. Without this, Table 4's entries cannot support the claim that air traffic flows exhibit chaotic signatures.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§1.2] The sentence 'Finally, Sec. 5 will conclude by discussing some additional techniques' is a cross-reference error: the additional techniques are discussed in Sec. 6.1, not in Sec. 5.
  2. [§4.2] The sentence 'To the best of our knowledge, Tab. 4 lists all papers analysing fractal and multi-fractal properties' should refer to Table 3; Table 4 is the table for nonlinear-dynamics papers.
  3. [Table 4] The table header reads 'Larguest Lyapunov Exponent'; it should be 'Largest Lyapunov Exponent'.
  4. [§3.2] The phrase 'the most significant scale being the one of six hours' is awkward; consider rephrasing to 'the most significant scale being six hours'.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Review-level circularity is partial: landing-interval fractality and irreversibility pillars rest on the reviewers' own prior works, and §4.2's 'bifractal nature' reading of self-cited [62] collides with §4.3's artifact warning drawn from the same reference, though the central thesis retains independent support.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 4.2 (Fractality, Applications), citing Ref. [62]; contradicted by Section 4.3 (Fractality, Lessons learned)]
    "§4.2: "Multifractal properties were also found in landing time intervals at three major European airports (Frankfurt, Heathrow, and Tegel) [62]. The authors found a bifractal nature." §4.3: "oscillatory trends can introduce artificial crossovers in the fluctuation function, mimicking multifractality and falsely suggesting long-range correlations [62, 134, 135]." Ref. [62] title: "Corrupted bifractal features in finite uncorrelated power-law distributed data.""

    The review's only support for the 'bifractal nature' of landing intervals is self-authored Ref. [62], the same reference it cites in §4.3 to warn that oscillatory trends mimic multifractality and falsely suggest long-range correlations, and whose own title says the bifractal features are corrupted. §4.3 also states that 'daily trends are an inherent part of the dynamics' and can 'artificially increase the value of H'. The review never reports whether the landing-interval series of [61,62] were detrended of that daily cycle, nor whether surrogate or null-model controls were applied, so the positive multifractality claim for this data type reduces to a self-citation whose content flags the very signature as possibly spurious.

  2. self citation load bearing [Section 6.1 (Time irreversibility)]
    ""To the best of our knowledge, only three works have used irreversibility tests in the context of air transport. Using two different metrics, Refs. [101] and [179] respectively detected low and large irreversibility on delay time series... In a recent analysis [61], the authors investigated the irreversibility of inter-landing time sequences...""

    The paragraph's directional conclusion that irreversibility findings 'point to the presence of delay propagation mechanisms and memory' is supported exclusively by three works, each co-authored by the present reviewers: Ref. [101] (Martinez/Ramasco/Zanin), Ref. [179] (Zanin), and Ref. [61] (Olivares et al.). The review even asserts completeness ('only three works have used irreversibility tests'), so the entire empirical basis of this claim is the authors' own corpus, with no independent corroboration cited. The conclusion is therefore sustained by a self-citation cluster rather than by external evidence.

full rationale

This paper is a literature review: it performs no new estimation, fits no parameters, and derives no equation from data, so the classic circular patterns (a self-definitional X-from-Y, a fitted input renamed as a prediction, an ansatz smuggled in via citation, or a uniqueness theorem imported from the authors) are absent by construction. The central thesis — that statistical physics metrics uncover long-range correlations, multifractality, and chaos in air-traffic time series — is genuinely supported by non-self-cited studies: Hurst exponents above 0.5 for delay series come from Ref. [130]; flow-volume multifractality with a roughly 26-hour crossover from Refs. [132,133]; positive largest Lyapunov exponents and non-integer correlation dimensions from Refs. [143-146]. On that basis the review scores low on derivation-level circularity. However, two sub-pillars of the narrative are carried by the reviewers' own prior corpus. First, the claim of a 'bifractal nature' in European landing intervals (§4.2) is attributed solely to self-authored Ref. [62], the same reference on which §4.3 relies for the warning that oscillatory trends 'mimic multifractality and falsely suggest long-range correlations', and whose own title announces 'Corrupted bifractal features in finite uncorrelated power-law distributed data'. The review never states whether the landing-interval series were detrended of the daily cycle it calls 'an inherent part of the dynamics', nor whether surrogate or null-model controls were applied, so this positive evidence reduces to a self-citation whose content flags the signature as potentially spurious. Second, the irreversibility discussion in §6.1 asserts a completeness claim ('only three works') and a directional conclusion ('delay propagation mechanisms and memory') whose cited evidence consists exclusively of works co-authored by the reviewers ([101], [179], [61]). These are load-bearing self-citations for the landing-interval and irreversibility facets, though not for the whole thesis; the score of 4 reflects partial rather than total circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is a review with no new derivations, so it introduces no free parameters or invented entities. Its central thesis rests on the reliability of the cited primary literature and on the applicability of statistical physics concepts to air transport data.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The cited empirical studies on air transport time series are methodologically sound and their findings accurately reported.
    The review's synthesis of long-range correlations, multifractality, and chaotic signatures is built entirely on the results of the papers it cites, including several by the authors.
  • domain assumption Statistical physics concepts (entropy, Hurst exponent, Lyapunov exponent) transfer meaningfully to aggregate air transport time series.
    The paper assumes that coarse-grained operational data behave like physical observables with stationary statistical properties, despite known non-stationarities and data heterogeneity discussed in Section 6.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Beyond Classical Models: Statistical Physics Tools for the Analysis of Time Series in Modern Air Transport." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IJ57T2TJ

@misc{pith2026250720927,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Beyond Classical Models: Statistical Physics Tools for the Analysis of Time Series in Modern Air Transport},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IJ57T2TJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.20927}
}
read the original abstract

Within the continuous endeavour of improving the efficiency and resilience of air transport, the trend of using concepts and metrics from statistical physics has recently gained momentum. This scientific discipline, which integrates elements from physics and statistics, aims at extracting knowledge about the microscale rules governing a (potentially complex) system when only its macroscale is observable. Translated to air transport, this entails extracting information about how individual operations are managed, by only studying coarse-grained information, e.g. average delays. We here review some fundamental concepts of statistical physics, and explore how these have been applied to the analysis of time series representing different aspects of the air transport system. In order to overcome the abstractness and complexity of some of these concepts, intuitive definitions and explanations are provided whenever possible. We further conclude by discussing the main obstacles towards a more widespread adoption of statistical physics in air transport, and sketch topics that we believe may be relevant in the future.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

183 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [62]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications603, 127828 (2022)

    Olivares, F., Zanin, M.: Corrupted bifractal features in finite uncorrelated power- law distributed data. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications603, 127828 (2022)

    2022

  2. [61]

    Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review170, 102998 (2023) 32

    Olivares, F., Sun, X., Wandelt, S., Zanin, M.: Measuring landing indepen- dence and interactions using statistical physics. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review170, 102998 (2023) 32

    2023

  3. [67]

    Entropy27(4), 354 (2025)

    Olivares,F.,Zanin,M.:Quantifyingdeviationsfromgaussianitywithapplication to flight delay distributions. Entropy27(4), 354 (2025)

    2025

  4. [100]

    Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science33(3) (2023)

    Olivares, F., Zunino, L., Zanin, M.: Markov-modulated model for landing flow dynamics: An ordinal analysis validation. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science33(3) (2023)

    2023

  5. [101]

    Chaos: An Interdisci- plinary Journal of Nonlinear Science33(3) (2023)

    Martinez, J.H., Ramasco, J.J., Zanin, M.: On the complementarity of ordinal 35 patterns-based entropy and time asymmetry metrics. Chaos: An Interdisci- plinary Journal of Nonlinear Science33(3) (2023)

    2023

  6. [137]

    Physica A: statistical mechanics and its applications 389(18), 3844–3855 (2010)

    Barunik, J., Kristoufek, L.: On hurst exponent estimation under heavy-tailed distributions. Physica A: statistical mechanics and its applications 389(18), 3844–3855 (2010)

    work page 2010

  7. [146]

    Trans- actions of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics31(6), 636–642 (2014)

    wei, C., Minghua, H.: Chaotic characteristic analysis of air traffic system. Trans- actions of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics31(6), 636–642 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [1]

    CRC Press, London, UK

    Janic, M.: Air Transport System Analysis and Modelling. CRC Press, London, UK. (2000)

    2000

Show all 183 references
  1. [2]

    Springer, Vienna

    Schmitt, D., Gollnick, V., Schmitt, D., Gollnick, V.: The Air Transport System. Springer, Vienna. (2016)

    2016

  2. [3]

    Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., England

    Cook, A.: European Air Traffic Management: Principles, Practice, and Research. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., England. (2007)

    2007

  3. [4]

    Elsevier, Netherlands

    Arblaster, M.: Air Traffic Management: Economics, Regulation and Governance. Elsevier, Netherlands. (2018)

    2018

  4. [5]

    Transportation research record2177(1), 49–59 (2010)

    Baik, H., Li, T., Chintapudi, N.K.: Estimation of flight delay costs for us domestic air passengers. Transportation research record2177(1), 49–59 (2010)

    2010

  5. [6]

    Journal of Transport Economics and Policy (JTEP)47(1), 107–121 (2013) 28

    Peterson, E.B., Neels, K., Barczi, N., Graham, T.: The economic cost of airline flight delay. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy (JTEP)47(1), 107–121 (2013) 28

    2013

  6. [7]

    Trans- portation Research Part A: General25(2-3), 91–99 (1991)

    Gifford, J.L., Sinha, P.: Airport congestion and near-midair collisions. Trans- portation Research Part A: General25(2-3), 91–99 (1991)

    1991

  7. [8]

    International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace 11(1), 4 (2024)

    Dy, L.R.I., Mott, J.H.: Airspace saturation and midair collision risk: A case study at a class d airport. International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace 11(1), 4 (2024)

    2024

  8. [9]

    Management Science41(8), 1279–1295 (1995)

    Peterson, M.D., Bertsimas, D.J., Odoni, A.R.: Models and algorithms for tran- sient queueing congestion at airports. Management Science41(8), 1279–1295 (1995)

    1995

  9. [10]

    Journal of Air Transport Management34, 116–122 (2014)

    Caccavale, M.V., Iovanella, A., Lancia, C., Lulli, G., Scoppola, B.: A model of inbound air traffic: The application to heathrow airport. Journal of Air Transport Management34, 116–122 (2014)

    2014

  10. [11]

    IEEE transactions on Control systems technology 14(5), 804–818 (2006)

    Bayen, A.M., Raffard, R.L., Tomlin, C.J.: Adjoint-based control of a new eule- rian network model of air traffic flow. IEEE transactions on Control systems technology 14(5), 804–818 (2006)

    2006

  11. [12]

    Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics29(1), 12–19 (2006)

    Menon, P., Sweriduk, G., Lam, T., Diaz, G., Bilimoria, K.D.: Computer-aided eulerian air traffic flow modeling and predictive control. Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics29(1), 12–19 (2006)

    2006

  12. [13]

    Transportation research part B: Methodological 106, 29–51 (2017)

    Yang, L., Yin, S., Han, K., Haddad, J., Hu, M.: Fundamental diagrams of air- port surface traffic: Models and applications. Transportation research part B: Methodological 106, 29–51 (2017)

    2017

  13. [14]

    Transportation research part B: Methodological 53, 1–16 (2013)

    Wei, P., Cao, Y., Sun, D.: Total unimodularity and decomposition method for large-scale air traffic cell transmission model. Transportation research part B: Methodological 53, 1–16 (2013)

    2013

  14. [15]

    Scientific reports3(1), 1159 (2013)

    Fleurquin, P., Ramasco, J.J., Eguiluz, V.M.: Systemic delay propagation in the us airport network. Scientific reports3(1), 1159 (2013)

    2013

  15. [16]

    Nature 435(7039), 207–211 (2005)

    Barabasi, A.-L.: The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics. Nature 435(7039), 207–211 (2005)

    2005

  16. [17]

    Journal of Transportation Engineering135(4), 206–216 (2009)

    Janic, M.: Modeling airport operations affected by a large-scale disruption. Journal of Transportation Engineering135(4), 206–216 (2009)

    2009

  17. [18]

    Journal of Air Transportation24(1), 18–28 (2016)

    Kicinger, R., Chen, J.-T., Steiner, M., Pinto, J.: Airport capacity predic- tion with explicit consideration of weather forecast uncertainty. Journal of Air Transportation24(1), 18–28 (2016)

    2016

  18. [19]

    Simulation98(12), 1097–1114 29 (2022)

    Jen, H.-C., Huff, B.L., LeBoulluec, A.K., Nasirian, B., Bum Kim, S., Rosen- berger, J.M., Chen, V.C.: A discrete-event simulation tool for airport deicing activities: Dallas-fort worth international airport. Simulation98(12), 1097–1114 29 (2022)

    2022

  19. [20]

    Journal of Air Transportation33(2), 158–168 (2025)

    Jones, J.C., Ellenbogen, Z.: Risk-adjusted air traffic management strategies for convective weather conditions. Journal of Air Transportation33(2), 158–168 (2025)

    2025

  20. [21]

    Aerospace5(4), 109 (2018)

    Schultz, M., Lorenz, S., Schmitz, R., Delgado, L.: Weather impact on airport performance. Aerospace5(4), 109 (2018)

    2018

  21. [22]

    Transportation research part D: transport and environment83, 102362 (2020)

    Zhou, L., Chen, Z.: Measuring the performance of airport resilience to severe weather events. Transportation research part D: transport and environment83, 102362 (2020)

    2020

  22. [23]

    Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies143, 103811 (2022)

    Lui, G.N., Hon, K.K., Liem, R.P.: Weather impact quantification on airport arrival on-time performance through a bayesian statistics modeling approach. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies143, 103811 (2022)

    2022

  23. [24]

    Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York

    Huang, K.: Introduction to Statistical Physics. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York. (2009)

    2009

  24. [25]

    John Wiley & Sons, Germany

    Reichl, L.E.: A Modern Course in Statistical Physics. John Wiley & Sons, Germany. (2016)

    2016

  25. [26]

    Advances in physics 50(2), 209–295 (2001)

    Drossel, B.: Biological evolution and statistical physics. Advances in physics 50(2), 209–295 (2001)

    2001

  26. [27]

    Trends in ecology & evolution26(8), 424–432 (2011)

    De Vladar, H.P., Barton, N.H.: The contribution of statistical physics to evolutionary biology. Trends in ecology & evolution26(8), 424–432 (2011)

    2011

  27. [28]

    Reviews of modern physics81(2), 591–646 (2009)

    Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., Loreto, V.: Statistical physics of social dynamics. Reviews of modern physics81(2), 591–646 (2009)

    2009

  28. [29]

    Physics Reports329(4-6), 199–329 (2000)

    Chowdhury, D., Santen, L., Schadschneider, A.: Statistical physics of vehicular traffic and some related systems. Physics Reports329(4-6), 199–329 (2000)

    2000

  29. [30]

    Physics World14(7), 33 (2001)

    Barabasi, A.-L.: The physics of the web. Physics World14(7), 33 (2001)

    2001

  30. [31]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications392(11), 2688–2700 (2013)

    Pagani, G.A., Aiello, M.: The power grid as a complex network: a survey. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications392(11), 2688–2700 (2013)

    2013

  31. [32]

    Nature Reviews Physics1(6), 406–415 (2019)

    Barthelemy, M.: The statistical physics of cities. Nature Reviews Physics1(6), 406–415 (2019)

    2019

  32. [33]

    Journal of Air Transport Management42, 149–158 (2015)

    Cook, A., Blom, H.A., Lillo, F., Mantegna, R.N., Micciche, S., Rivas, D., Vazquez, R., Zanin, M.: Applying complexity science to air traffic management. Journal of Air Transport Management42, 149–158 (2015)

    2015

  33. [34]

    Chaos, Solitons & Fractals81, 117–135 (2015)

    Tang, L., Lv, H., Yang, F., Yu, L.: Complexity testing techniques for time series 30 data: A comprehensive literature review. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals81, 117–135 (2015)

    2015

  34. [35]

    Cambridge university press, England

    Kantz, H., Schreiber, T.: Nonlinear Time Series Analysis. Cambridge university press, England. (2003)

    2003

  35. [36]

    Springer, New York

    Tsonis, A.A.: Chaos: from Theory to Applications. Springer, New York. (2012)

    2012

  36. [37]

    In: Universality in Chaos, 2nd Edition, pp

    Lorenz, E.N.: Deterministic nonperiodic flow 1. In: Universality in Chaos, 2nd Edition, pp. 367–378. Routledge, ??? (2017)

    2017

  37. [38]

    Physica D: nonlinear phenomena9(1-2), 189–208 (1983)

    Grassberger, P., Procaccia, I.: Measuring the strangeness of strange attractors. Physica D: nonlinear phenomena9(1-2), 189–208 (1983)

    1983

  38. [39]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications316(1-4), 87–114 (2002)

    Kantelhardt, J.W., Zschiegner, S.A., Koscielny-Bunde, E., Havlin, S., Bunde, A., Stanley, H.E.: Multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis of nonstationary time series. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications316(1-4), 87–114 (2002)

    2002

  39. [40]

    Journal of Applied Probability 12(4), 831–836 (1975)

    Weiss, G.: Time-reversibility of linear stochastic processes. Journal of Applied Probability 12(4), 831–836 (1975)

    1975

  40. [41]

    Entropy20(9), 665 (2018)

    Zanin, M., Rodriguez-Gonzalez, A., Menasalvas Ruiz, E., Papo, D.: Assess- ing time series reversibility through permutation patterns. Entropy20(9), 665 (2018)

    2018

  41. [42]

    A Companion to the Philosophy of Time, 262–281 (2013)

    Wallace, D.: The arrow of time in physics. A Companion to the Philosophy of Time, 262–281 (2013)

    2013

  42. [43]

    186–190 (2022)

    Wang,J.,Pan,W.:Flightdelaypredictionbasedonarima.In:2022International Conference on Computer Engineering and Artificial Intelligence (ICCEAI), pp. 186–190 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCEAI55464.2022.00047

    2022

  43. [44]

    IET Intelligent Transport Systems16(7), 890–907 (2022)

    Wang, F., Bi, J., Xie, D., Zhao, X.: Flight delay forecasting and analysis of direct and indirect factors. IET Intelligent Transport Systems16(7), 890–907 (2022)

    2022

  44. [45]

    Sustainability 14(22), 15180 (2022)

    Wang, Z., Liao, C., Hang, X., Li, L., Delahaye, D., Hansen, M.: Distribution prediction of strategic flight delays via machine learning methods. Sustainability 14(22), 15180 (2022)

    2022

  45. [46]

    Journal of Air Transport Management 87, 101852 (2020)

    Straubinger, A., Rothfeld, R., Shamiyeh, M., Büchter, K.-D., Kaiser, J., Plötner, K.O.: An overview of current research and developments in urban air mobility– setting the scene for uam introduction. Journal of Air Transport Management 87, 101852 (2020)

    2020

  46. [47]

    IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems22(9), 6074–6087 (2021) 31

    Cohen, A.P., Shaheen, S.A., Farrar, E.M.: Urban air mobility: History, ecosys- tem, market potential, and challenges. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems22(9), 6074–6087 (2021) 31

    2021

  47. [48]

    nature521(7553), 460–466 (2015)

    Floreano, D., Wood, R.J.: Science, technology and the future of small autonomous drones. nature521(7553), 460–466 (2015)

    2015

  48. [49]

    Physical review 106(4), 620 (1957)

    Jaynes, E.T.: Information theory and statistical mechanics. Physical review 106(4), 620 (1957)

    1957

  49. [50]

    Physica A: Statistical mechanics and its applications 322, 267–275 (2003)

    Beck, C., Cohen, E.G.: Superstatistics. Physica A: Statistical mechanics and its applications 322, 267–275 (2003)

    2003

  50. [51]

    The Bell system technical journal27(3), 379–423 (1948)

    Shannon, C.E.: A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell system technical journal27(3), 379–423 (1948)

    1948

  51. [52]

    In: Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Vol- ume 1: Contributions to the Theory of Statistics, vol

    Renyi, A.: On measures of entropy and information. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Vol- ume 1: Contributions to the Theory of Statistics, vol. 4, pp. 547–562 (1961). University of California Press

    1961

  52. [53]

    Journal of statistical physics52, 479–487 (1988)

    Tsallis, C.: Possible generalization of boltzmann-gibbs statistics. Journal of statistical physics52, 479–487 (1988)

    1988

  53. [54]

    Springer, ??? (2005)

    Dekking, F.M.: A Modern Introduction to Probability and Statistics: Under- standing Why and How. Springer, ??? (2005)

    2005

  54. [55]

    CRC press, ??? (2024)

    Casella, G., Berger, R.: Statistical Inference. CRC press, ??? (2024)

    2024

  55. [56]

    John Wiley & Sons, ??? (2011)

    Forbes, C., Evans, M., Hastings, N., Peacock, B.: Statistical Distributions. John Wiley & Sons, ??? (2011)

    2011

  56. [57]

    Scientific Reports11(1), 7855 (2021)

    Mitsokapas, E., Schäfer, B., Harris, R.J., Beck, C.: Statistical characterization of airplane delays. Scientific Reports11(1), 7855 (2021)

    2021

  57. [58]

    In: AIAA’s Aircraft Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) 2002 Technical Forum, p

    Mueller, E., Chatterji, G.: Analysis of aircraft arrival and departure delay char- acteristics. In: AIAA’s Aircraft Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) 2002 Technical Forum, p. 5866 (2002)

    2002

  58. [59]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association103(481), 112–125 (2008)

    Tu, Y., Ball, M.O., Jank, W.S.: Estimating flight departure delay distribu- tions—a statistical approach with long-term trend and short-term pattern. Journal of the American Statistical Association103(481), 112–125 (2008)

    2008

  59. [60]

    Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst., DSES Tech

    Willemain, T.R., Fan, H., Ma, H.: Statistical analysis of intervals between pro- jected airport arrivals. Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst., DSES Tech. Rept, 38–04 (2004)

    2004

  60. [63]

    Physical Review E92(6), 062815 (2015)

    Ito, H., Nishinari, K.: Universal bursty behavior in the air transportation system. Physical Review E92(6), 062815 (2015)

    2015

  61. [64]

    Scientific reports 10(1), 6890 (2020)

    Wang, Y., Cao, Y., Zhu, C., Wu, F., Hu, M., Duong, V., Watkins, M., Barzel, B., Stanley, H.E.: Universal patterns in passenger flight departure delays. Scientific reports 10(1), 6890 (2020)

    2020

  62. [65]

    Journal of Advanced Transportation 2019(1), 7069380 (2019)

    Cao, Y., Zhu, C., Wang, Y., Li, Q.: A method of reducing flight delay by explor- ing internal mechanism of flight delays. Journal of Advanced Transportation 2019(1), 7069380 (2019)

    2019

  63. [66]

    Master’s thesis (2023)

    Szabo, Z.: Non-linear transitions in air transport delays: models and data. Master’s thesis (2023)

    2023

  64. [68]

    Physical Review E105(4), 045310 (2022)

    Zunino,L.,Olivares,F.,Ribeiro,H.V.,Rosso,O.A.:Permutationjensen-shannon distance: A versatile and fast symbolic tool for complex time-series analysis. Physical Review E105(4), 045310 (2022)

    2022

  65. [69]

    Physical review letters88(17), 174102 (2002)

    Bandt, C., Pompe, B.: Permutation entropy: a natural complexity measure for time series. Physical review letters88(17), 174102 (2002)

    2002

  66. [70]

    Chinese Journal of Aeronautics30(2), 479–490 (2017)

    Cook, A., Belkoura, S., Zanin, M.: Atm performance measurement in europe, the us and china. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics30(2), 479–490 (2017)

    2017

  67. [71]

    Molecular BioSystems5(12), 1482–1493 (2009)

    Lima-Mendez, G., Van Helden, J.: The powerful law of the power law and other myths in network biology. Molecular BioSystems5(12), 1482–1493 (2009)

    2009

  68. [72]

    Nature communications 10(1), 1017 (2019)

    Broido, A.D., Clauset, A.: Scale-free networks are rare. Nature communications 10(1), 1017 (2019)

    2019

  69. [73]

    Physical Review Research1(3), 033034 (2019)

    Voitalov, I., Van Der Hoorn, P., Van Der Hofstad, R., Krioukov, D.: Scale-free networks well done. Physical Review Research1(3), 033034 (2019)

    2019

  70. [74]

    Scientific reports11(1), 6542 (2021)

    Smith, H.B., Kim, H., Walker, S.I.: Scarcity of scale-free topology is universal across biochemical networks. Scientific reports11(1), 6542 (2021)

    2021

  71. [75]

    Proceed- ings of the national academy of sciences88(6), 2297–2301 (1991)

    Pincus, S.M.: Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. Proceed- ings of the national academy of sciences88(6), 2297–2301 (1991)

    1991

  72. [76]

    PNAS nexus 3(10), 417 (2024) 33

    Wang, H., Song, C., Gao, P.: Complexity and entropy of natural patterns. PNAS nexus 3(10), 417 (2024) 33

    2024

  73. [77]

    American Journal of Physics 33(5), 391–398 (1965)

    Jaynes, E.T.,et al.: Gibbs vs boltzmann entropies. American Journal of Physics 33(5), 391–398 (1965)

    1965

  74. [78]

    Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General12(11), 2053 (1979)

    Powell, G., Percival, I.: A spectral entropy method for distinguishing regular and irregular motion of hamiltonian systems. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General12(11), 2053 (1979)

    1979

  75. [79]

    Journal of neuroscience methods105(1), 65–75 (2001)

    Rosso, O.A., Blanco, S., Yordanova, J., Kolev, V., Figliola, A., Schürmann, M., Başar, E.: Wavelet entropy: a new tool for analysis of short duration brain electrical signals. Journal of neuroscience methods105(1), 65–75 (2001)

    2001

  76. [80]

    American journal of physiology-heart and circulatory physiology278(6), 2039–2049 (2000)

    Richman, J.S., Moorman, J.R.: Physiological time-series analysis using approx- imate entropy and sample entropy. American journal of physiology-heart and circulatory physiology278(6), 2039–2049 (2000)

    2000

  77. [81]

    Entropy21(6), 541 (2019)

    Delgado-Bonal, A., Marshak, A.: Approximate entropy and sample entropy: A comprehensive tutorial. Entropy21(6), 541 (2019)

    2019

  78. [82]

    Physical review letters 100(15), 158101 (2008)

    Staniek, M., Lehnertz, K.: Symbolic transfer entropy. Physical review letters 100(15), 158101 (2008)

    2008

  79. [83]

    Lake, D.E., Richman, J.S., Griffin, M.P., Moorman, J.R.: Sample entropy analy- sisofneonatalheartratevariability.AmericanJournalofPhysiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology283(3), 789–797 (2002)

    2002

  80. [84]

    Annals of biomedical engineering41, 349–365 (2013)

    Yentes, J.M., Hunt, N., Schmid, K.K., Kaipust, J.P., McGrath, D., Stergiou, N.: The appropriate use of approximate entropy and sample entropy with short data sets. Annals of biomedical engineering41, 349–365 (2013)

    2013

  81. [85]

    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment28, 1401–1408 (2014)

    Chou, C.-M.: Complexity analysis of rainfall and runoff time series based on sample entropy in different temporal scales. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment28, 1401–1408 (2014)

    2014

  82. [86]

    Theoretical and Applied Climatology136, 429–440 (2019)

    Xavier, S.F.A., Silva Jale, J., Stosic, T., Santos, C.A.C., Singh, V.P.: An appli- cation of sample entropy to precipitation in paraiba state, brazil. Theoretical and Applied Climatology136, 429–440 (2019)

    2019

  83. [87]

    Procedia Computer Science 207, 255–264 (2022)

    Olbrys, J., Majewska, E.: Approximate entropy and sample entropy algorithms in financial time series analyses. Procedia Computer Science 207, 255–264 (2022)

    2022

  84. [88]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications369(2), 439–462 (2006)

    Martin, M., Plastino, A., Rosso, O.A.: Generalized statistical complexity mea- sures: Geometrical and analytical properties. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications369(2), 439–462 (2006)

    2006

  85. [89]

    Physical 34 Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics86(4), 046210 (2012)

    Zunino, L., Soriano, M.C., Rosso, O.A.: Distinguishing chaotic and stochastic dynamics from time series by using a multiscale symbolic approach. Physical 34 Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics86(4), 046210 (2012)

    2012

  86. [90]

    Physics Letters A372(27-28), 4768–4774 (2008)

    Zunino, L., Perez, D.G., Martin, M., Garavaglia, M., Plastino, A., Rosso, O.A.: Permutation entropy of fractional brownian motion and fractional gaussian noise. Physics Letters A372(27-28), 4768–4774 (2008)

    2008

  87. [91]

    Physical review letters99(15), 154102 (2007)

    Rosso, O.A., Larrondo, H., Martin, M.T., Plastino, A., Fuentes, M.A.: Distin- guishing noise from chaos. Physical review letters99(15), 154102 (2007)

    2007

  88. [92]

    Europhysics Letters79(5), 50001 (2007)

    Amigo, J.M., Zambrano, S., Sanjuan, M.A.: True and false forbidden patterns in deterministic and random dynamics. Europhysics Letters79(5), 50001 (2007)

    2007

  89. [93]

    Computers in biology and medicine42(3), 319–327 (2012)

    Parlitz, U., Berg, S., Luther, S., Schirdewan, A., Kurths, J., Wessel, N.: Classi- fying cardiac biosignals using ordinal pattern statistics and symbolic dynamics. Computers in biology and medicine42(3), 319–327 (2012)

    2012

  90. [94]

    In: 2012 Proceedings of International Conference on Modelling, Identification and Control, pp

    Dong, B., Du, W.: Analysis of complexity measure of air traffic flow at termi- nal area based on approximate entropy. In: 2012 Proceedings of International Conference on Modelling, Identification and Control, pp. 1272–1277 (2012). IEEE

    2012

  91. [95]

    Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (2003)

    Sprott, J.C.: Chaos and Time-Series Analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (2003)

    2003

  92. [96]

    In: 2019 Chinese Control And Decision Conference (CCDC), pp

    Wang, F., Zhao, L.: Complexity analysis of air traffic flow based on sample entropy. In: 2019 Chinese Control And Decision Conference (CCDC), pp. 5368– 5371 (2019). IEEE

    2019

  93. [97]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 548, 124485 (2020)

    Liu, H., Zhang, X., Zhang, X.: Multiscale complexity analysis on airport air traf- fic flow volume time series. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 548, 124485 (2020)

    2020

  94. [98]

    Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 82(4), 046212 (2010)

    Zunino, L., Soriano, M.C., Fischer, I., Rosso, O.A., Mirasso, C.R.: Permutation- information-theory approach to unveil delay dynamics from time-series analysis. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 82(4), 046212 (2010)

    2010

  95. [99]

    Chaos, Solitons & Fractals165, 112795 (2022)

    Liu, H., Zhang, X., Hu, H., Zhang, X.: Exploring the impact of flow values on multiscale complexity quantification of airport flight flow fluctuations. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals165, 112795 (2022)

    2022

  96. [102]

    Feldman, D.P., Crutchfield, J.P.: Measures of statistical complexity: Why? Physics Letters A238(4-5), 244–252 (1998)

    1998

  97. [103]

    IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 17(5), 1250–1257 (2011)

    Zunino, L., Rosso, O.A., Soriano, M.C.: Characterizing the hyperchaotic dynam- ics of a semiconductor laser subject to optical feedback via permutation entropy. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 17(5), 1250–1257 (2011)

    2011

  98. [104]

    Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal20, 3257–3267 (2022)

    Zanin, M., Olivares, F., Pulido-Valdeolivas, I., Rausell, E., Gomez-Andres, D.: Gait analysis under the lens of statistical physics. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal20, 3257–3267 (2022)

    2022

  99. [105]

    Physical review letters70(9), 1343 (1993)

    Peng, C.-K., Mietus, J., Hausdorff, J., Havlin, S., Stanley, H.E., Goldberger, A.L.: Long-range anticorrelations and non-gaussian behavior of the heartbeat. Physical review letters70(9), 1343 (1993)

    1993

  100. [106]

    Chinese Physics B19(8), 080205 (2010)

    Peng, S., Jun-Feng, W., Tie-Qiao, T., Shu-Long, Z.: Long-range correlation analysis of urban traffic data. Chinese Physics B19(8), 080205 (2010)

    2010

  101. [107]

    Physical Review E89(3), 032916 (2014)

    Wang, J., Shang, P., Cui, X.: Multiscale multifractal analysis of traffic signals to uncover richer structures. Physical Review E89(3), 032916 (2014)

    2014

  102. [108]

    Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 28(1-3), 98–108 (2015)

    Xu, M., Shang, P., Xia, J.: Traffic signals analysis using qsdiff and qhdiff with surrogate data. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 28(1-3), 98–108 (2015)

    2015

  103. [109]

    In: Proceedings of the 23rd SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, pp

    Thakur, G.S., Hui, P., Helmy, A.: Evidence of long range dependence and self- similarity in urban traffic systems. In: Proceedings of the 23rd SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, pp. 1–10 (2015)

    2015

  104. [110]

    Europhysics Letters118(3), 38005 (2017)

    Krause, S.M., Habel, L., Guhr, T., Schreckenberg, M.: The importance of antipersistence for traffic jams. Europhysics Letters118(3), 38005 (2017)

    2017

  105. [111]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications492, 639–650 (2018)

    Feng, S., Wang, X., Sun, H., Zhang, Y., Li, L.: A better understanding of long- range temporal dependence of traffic flow time series. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications492, 639–650 (2018)

    2018

  106. [112]

    Optics letters 41(24), 5696–5699 (2016)

    Funes, G., Olivares, F., Weinberger, C.G., Carrasco, Y.D., Nuñez, L., Perez, D.G.: Synthesis of anisotropic optical turbulence at the laboratory. Optics letters 41(24), 5696–5699 (2016)

    2016

  107. [113]

    Fractals29(02), 2150049 (2021) 36

    Olivares, F., Funes, G., Perez, D.G.: High frequency multifractality in return intervals from fading induced by turbulence. Fractals29(02), 2150049 (2021) 36

    2021

  108. [114]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications390(6), 981–989 (2011)

    Ozger, M.: Scaling characteristics of ocean wave height time series. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications390(6), 981–989 (2011)

    2011

  109. [115]

    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 30, 1515–1525 (2016)

    He, H.-d., Pan, W., Lu, W.-z., Xue, Y., Peng, G.-h.: Multifractal prop- erty and long-range cross-correlation behavior of particulate matters at urban traffic intersection in shanghai. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 30, 1515–1525 (2016)

    2016

  110. [116]

    Routledge, New York

    Beran, J.: Statistics for Long-memory Processes. Routledge, New York. (2017)

    2017

  111. [117]

    Transactions of the American society of civil engineers116(1), 770–799 (1951)

    Hurst, H.E.: Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs. Transactions of the American society of civil engineers116(1), 770–799 (1951)

    1951

  112. [118]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications295(3-4), 441–454 (2001)

    Kantelhardt, J.W., Koscielny-Bunde, E., Rego, H.H., Havlin, S., Bunde, A.: Detecting long-range correlations with detrended fluctuation analysis. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications295(3-4), 441–454 (2001)

    2001

  113. [119]

    Physical review e 49(2), 1685 (1994)

    Peng, C.-K., Buldyrev, S.V., Havlin, S., Simons, M., Stanley, H.E., Goldberger, A.L.: Mosaic organization of dna nucleotides. Physical review e 49(2), 1685 (1994)

    1994

  114. [120]

    Physical Review E107(3), 034139 (2023)

    Kwapien, J., Blasiak, P., Drozdz, S., Oswiecimka, P.: Genuine multifractality in time series is due to temporal correlations. Physical Review E107(3), 034139 (2023)

    2023

  115. [121]

    Nonlinear Dynamics 100(2), 1689–1704 (2020)

    Oswiecimka, P., Drozdz, S., Frasca, M., Gebarowski, R., Yoshimura, N., Zunino, L., Minati, L.: Wavelet-based discrimination of isolated singularities masquerad- ing as multifractals in detrended fluctuation analyses. Nonlinear Dynamics 100(2), 1689–1704 (2020)

    2020

  116. [122]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications392(23), 5845– 5864 (2013)

    Grech, D., Pamuła, G.: On the multifractal effects generated by monofractal signals. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications392(23), 5845– 5864 (2013)

    2013

  117. [123]

    Physics Letters A 266(4-6), 282–289 (2000)

    Nakao, H.: Multi-scaling properties of truncated levy flights. Physics Letters A 266(4-6), 282–289 (2000)

    2000

  118. [124]

    Journal of time series analysis4(4), 221–238 (1983)

    Geweke, J., Porter-Hudak, S.: The estimation and application of long memory time series models. Journal of time series analysis4(4), 221–238 (1983)

    1983

  119. [125]

    IEEE transactions on information theory44(1), 2–15 (1998)

    Abry, P., Veitch, D.: Wavelet analysis of long-range-dependent traffic. IEEE transactions on information theory44(1), 2–15 (1998)

    1998

  120. [126]

    Physical Review E85(2), 021915 (2012)

    Gierałtowski, J., Żebrowski, J., Baranowski, R.: Multiscale multifractal analy- sis of heart rate variability recordings with a large number of occurrences of arrhythmia. Physical Review E85(2), 021915 (2012)

    2012

  121. [127]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 397, 17–30 (2014)

    Gulich, D., Zunino, L.: A criterion for the determination of optimal scaling 37 ranges in dfa and mf-dfa. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 397, 17–30 (2014)

    2014

  122. [128]

    Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 126, 63–88 (2016)

    Thompson, J.R., Wilson, J.R.: Multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis: Practical applications to financial time series. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 126, 63–88 (2016)

    2016

  123. [129]

    Frontiers in physiology3, 141 (2012)

    Ihlen, E.A.: Introduction to multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis in matlab. Frontiers in physiology3, 141 (2012)

    2012

  124. [130]

    Journal of Intelligent Systems30(1), 361–375 (2020)

    Lan, M., Shangheng, O.: Characteristic analysis of flight delayed time series. Journal of Intelligent Systems30(1), 361–375 (2020)

    2020

  125. [131]

    In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS-C), pp

    Wang, C., Zhang, Z., Zhu, M.: Nonlinear dynamic analysis of air traffic flow at different temporal scales: Nonlinear analysis approach versus complex net- works approach. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS-C), pp...

    2018

  126. [132]

    Zhang, X., Liu, H., Zhao, Y., Zhang, X.: Multifractal detrended fluctuation analysisonairtrafficflowtimeseries:Asingleairportcase.PhysicaA:Statistical Mechanics and its Applications531, 121790 (2019)

    2019

  127. [133]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications545, 123585 (2020)

    Liu, H., Zhang, X., Zhang, X.: Multiscale multifractal analysis on air traffic flow time series: A single airport departure flight case. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications545, 123585 (2020)

    2020

  128. [134]

    Katsev, S., L’Heureux, I.: Are hurst exponents estimated from short or irregular time series meaningful? Computers & Geosciences29(9), 1085–1089 (2003)

    2003

  129. [135]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 390(13), 2480–2490 (2011)

    Ludescher, J., Bogachev, M.I., Kantelhardt, J.W., Schumann, A.Y., Bunde, A.: On spurious and corrupted multifractality: The effects of additive noise, short- term memory and periodic trends. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 390(13), 2480–2490 (2011)

    2011

  130. [136]

    International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 15(05), 1767–1773 (2005)

    Nagarajan, R., Kavasseri, R.G.: Minimizing the effect of sinusoidal trends in detrended fluctuation analysis. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 15(05), 1767–1773 (2005)

    2005

  131. [138]

    Physica D: nonlinear phenomena 16(3), 285–317 (1985)

    Wolf, A., Swift, J.B., Swinney, H.L., Vastano, J.A.: Determining lyapunov expo- nents from a time series. Physica D: nonlinear phenomena 16(3), 285–317 (1985)

    1985

  132. [139]

    Physical 38 review letters50(5), 346 (1983)

    Grassberger, P., Procaccia, I.: Characterization of strange attractors. Physical 38 review letters50(5), 346 (1983)

    1983

  133. [140]

    Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 65(1-2), 117–134 (1993)

    Rosenstein, M.T., Collins, J.J., De Luca, C.J.: A practical method for calcu- lating largest lyapunov exponents from small data sets. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 65(1-2), 117–134 (1993)

    1993

  134. [141]

    Physics letters A185(1), 77–87 (1994)

    Kantz, H.: A robust method to estimate the maximal lyapunov exponent of a time series. Physics letters A185(1), 77–87 (1994)

    1994

  135. [142]

    Physical review A34(3), 2427 (1986)

    Theiler, J.: Spurious dimension from correlation algorithms applied to limited time-series data. Physical review A34(3), 2427 (1986)

    1986

  136. [143]

    Journal of Internet Technology24(5), 1131–1139 (2023)

    Yang, X., He, L., Zhang, Z., Luo, Q.: A chaotic discriminant algorithm for arrival traffic flow time series based on improved alternative data method. Journal of Internet Technology24(5), 1131–1139 (2023)

    2023

  137. [144]

    Journal of Advanced Transportation 2020(1), 8830731 (2020)

    Zhang, Z., Zhang, A., Sun, C., Xiang, S., Li, S.: Data-driven analysis of the chaotic characteristics of air traffic flow. Journal of Advanced Transportation 2020(1), 8830731 (2020)

    2020

  138. [145]

    Fractals32(04), 2340131 (2024)

    Zhang, Z., Cui, Z., Wang, Z., Meng, L.: Research on chaotic characteristics and short-term prediction of en-route traffic flow using ads-b data. Fractals32(04), 2340131 (2024)

    2024

  139. [147]

    nature410(6825), 268–276 (2001)

    Strogatz, S.H.: Exploring complex networks. nature410(6825), 268–276 (2001)

    2001

  140. [148]

    Information Sciences208, 39–54 (2012)

    Lizier, J.T., Prokopenko, M., Zomaya, A.Y.: Local measures of information storage in complex distributed computation. Information Sciences208, 39–54 (2012)

    2012

  141. [149]

    Physics Letters A209(5), 321–326 (1995)

    Lopez-Ruiz, R., Mancini, H., Calbet, X.: A statistical measure of complexity. Physics Letters A209(5), 321–326 (1995)

    1995

  142. [150]

    Physical review letters 63(2), 105 (1989)

    Crutchfield, J.P., Young, K.: Inferring statistical complexity. Physical review letters 63(2), 105 (1989)

    1989

  143. [151]

    Problems of information transmission1(1), 1–7 (1965)

    Kolmogorov, A.N.: Three approaches to the quantitative definition of informa- tion. Problems of information transmission1(1), 1–7 (1965)

    1965

  144. [152]

    Journal of the ACM (JACM)13(4), 547–569 (1966)

    Chaitin, G.J.: On the length of programs for computing finite binary sequences. Journal of the ACM (JACM)13(4), 547–569 (1966)

    1966

  145. [153]

    814–819 (2020)

    Ge, J., He, Y., Zhan, F.: Measuring the cycle of air cargo transport in china basedonspectrumanalysis.In:2020IEEE2ndInternationalConferenceonCivil 39 Aviation Safety and Information Technology (ICCASIT, pp. 814–819 (2020). IEEE

    2020

  146. [154]

    Journal of Airport Management 16(1), 87–104 (2021)

    Diana, T.: Doing more with less: An assessment of capacity utilisation using stochastic frontier and spectral analysis models in the case of atlanta hartsfield- jackson international airport. Journal of Airport Management 16(1), 87–104 (2021)

    2021

  147. [155]

    Sustainability 14(7), 4345 (2022)

    Barczak, A., Dembinska, I., Rozmus, D., Szopik-Depczynska, K.: The impact of covid-19 pandemic on air transport passenger markets-implications for selected eu airports based on time series models analysis. Sustainability 14(7), 4345 (2022)

    2022

  148. [156]

    Acta mathematica55(1), 117–258 (1930)

    Wiener, N.: Generalized harmonic analysis. Acta mathematica55(1), 117–258 (1930)

    1930

  149. [157]

    Psychological Methods28(3), 631 (2023)

    Vowels, M.J., Vowels, L.M., Wood, N.D.: Spectral and cross-spectral analysis—a tutorial for psychologists and social scientists. Psychological Methods28(3), 631 (2023)

    2023

  150. [158]

    Biological cybernetics84(6), 463–474 (2001)

    Baccala, L.A., Sameshima, K.: Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination. Biological cybernetics84(6), 463–474 (2001)

    2001

  151. [159]

    Biological cybernetics65(3), 203–210 (1991)

    Kaminski, M.J., Blinowska, K.J.: A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures. Biological cybernetics65(3), 203–210 (1991)

    1991

  152. [160]

    Nature138(3498), 840–841 (1936)

    Landau, L.: The theory of phase transitions. Nature138(3498), 840–841 (1936)

    1936

  153. [161]

    Sole, R.V.: Phase Transitions vol. 3. Princeton University Press, ??? (2011)

    2011

  154. [162]

    Strocchi, F.: Symmetry Breaking vol. 643. Springer, ??? (2005)

    2005

  155. [163]

    New Journal of Physics11(7), 073008 (2009)

    Parrondo, J.M., Broeck, C., Kawai, R.: Entropy production and the arrow of time. New Journal of Physics11(7), 073008 (2009)

    2009

  156. [164]

    Physics Today46(9), 32–38 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.881363

    Lebowitz, J.L.: Boltzmann’s entropy and time’s arrow. Physics Today46(9), 32–38 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.881363

    1993 doi

  157. [165]

    The European Physical Journal B85, 1–11 (2012)

    Lacasa, L., Nunez, A., Roldan, E., Parrondo, J.M., Luque, B.: Time series irre- versibility: a visibility graph approach. The European Physical Journal B85, 1–11 (2012)

    2012

  158. [166]

    Reports on Progress in Physics81(6), 066601 (2018) 40

    Gnesotto, F.S., Mura, F., Gladrow, J., Broedersz, C.P.: Broken detailed balance and non-equilibrium dynamics in living systems: a review. Reports on Progress in Physics81(6), 066601 (2018) 40

    2018

  159. [167]

    Physical review letters98(8), 080602 (2007)

    Kawai, R., Parrondo, J.M., Broeck, C.V.: Dissipation: The phase-space perspec- tive. Physical review letters98(8), 080602 (2007)

    2007

  160. [168]

    irreversibility

    Daw, C., Finney, C., Kennel, M.: Symbolic approach for measuring temporal “irreversibility”. Physical Review E62(2), 1912 (2000)

    2000

  161. [169]

    MIT press, ??? (1991)

    Brock, W.A., Hsieh, D.A., LeBaron, B.D.: Nonlinear Dynamics, Chaos, and Instability: Statistical Theory and Economic Evidence. MIT press, ??? (1991)

    1991

  162. [170]

    Econometric reviews15(3), 197–235 (1996)

    Broock, W.A., Scheinkman, J.A., Dechert, W.D., LeBaron, B.: A test for independence based on the correlation dimension. Econometric reviews15(3), 197–235 (1996)

    1996

  163. [171]

    Physical review letters 95(19), 198102 (2005)

    Costa, M., Goldberger, A.L., Peng, C.-K.: Broken asymmetry of the human heartbeat: loss of time irreversibility in aging and disease. Physical review letters 95(19), 198102 (2005)

    2005

  164. [172]

    Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 69(5), 056208 (2004)

    Kennel, M.B.: Testing time symmetry in time series using data compression dictionaries. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 69(5), 056208 (2004)

    2004

  165. [173]

    Physics Letters A 201(2-3), 221–228 (1995)

    Diks, C., Van Houwelingen, J., Takens, F., DeGoede, J.: Reversibility as a criterion for discriminating time series. Physics Letters A 201(2-3), 221–228 (1995)

    1995

  166. [174]

    Journal of statistical physics117, 599–615 (2004)

    Gaspard, P.: Time-reversed dynamical entropy and irreversibility in markovian random processes. Journal of statistical physics117, 599–615 (2004)

    2004

  167. [175]

    Chaos, Solitons & Fractals32(5), 1649–1654 (2007)

    Cammarota, C., Rogora, E.: Time reversal, symbolic series and irreversibility of human heartbeat. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals32(5), 1649–1654 (2007)

    2007

  168. [176]

    Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science28(12) (2018)

    Martinez, J.H., Herrera-Diestra, J.L., Chavez, M.: Detection of time reversibility in time series by ordinal patterns analysis. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science28(12) (2018)

    2018

  169. [177]

    Entropy23(11), 1474 (2021)

    Zanin, M., Papo, D.: Algorithmic approaches for assessing irreversibility in time series: Review and comparison. Entropy23(11), 1474 (2021)

    2021

  170. [178]

    Entropy27(2), 126 (2025)

    Zanin, M., Papo, D.: Algorithmic approaches for assessing multiscale irreversibil- ity in time series: Review and comparison. Entropy27(2), 126 (2025)

    2025

  171. [179]

    Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science31(10) (2021)

    Zanin, M.: Assessing time series irreversibility through micro-scale trends. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science31(10) (2021)

    2021

  172. [180]

    IEEE Access10, 28520– 28534 (2022) 41

    Ivanoska, I., Pastorino, L., Zanin, M.: Assessing identifiability in airport delay propagation roles through deep learning classification. IEEE Access10, 28520– 28534 (2022) 41

    2022

  173. [181]

    Plos one 20(2), 0318108 (2025)

    Cuerno, M., Guijarro, L., Valdes, R.M.A., Comendador, F.G.: Topological data analysis in air traffic management: The shape of big flight data sets. Plos one 20(2), 0318108 (2025)

    2025

  174. [182]

    Springer, Switzerland

    Hawkins, J.: Ergodic Dynamics. Springer, Switzerland. (2021)

    2021

  175. [183]

    Advances in Physics31(6), 669–735 (1982) 42

    Palmer, R.G.: Broken ergodicity. Advances in Physics31(6), 669–735 (1982) 42

    1982

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.