Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Resurgent Lambert series with characters

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Exact transseries found for doubly twisted Lambert series

desk verdict A genuine generalization of resurgent Lambert series to Dirichlet characters, with complete proofs in the terminating integer-parameter cases and an openly admitted, numerically well-tested conjecture underpinning the generic transseries. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.21352 v2 pith:JISRN5YE submitted 2025-07-28 math.NT hep-th

David Broadhurst , Daniele Dorigoni This is my paper
classification math.NThep-th MSC 11F1111F6711M0611M41
keywords LambertseriesDirichletcharacterstransseriesresurgenceFrickeinvolutiontwistedEisensteinquantummodularitytopologicalstringtheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies the doubly twisted Lambert series $\Xi_{s_1,s_2}(\chi_{r_1},\chi_{r_2};q)=\sum_{n_1,n_2}\chi_{r_1}(n_1)n_1^{-s_1}\chi_{r_2}(n_2)n_2^{-s_2}q^{n_1n_2}$ as $q\to1^-$, with $s_1,s_2\in\mathbb{C}$ and Dirichlet characters of moduli $r_1,r_2$. It claims that this series is captured exactly, for generic parameters and primitive characters, by a complete transseries: the resummation of the factorially divergent perturbative series plus an infinite non-perturbative tower of the same series evaluated at the Fricke-inverted argument $-1/(r_1r_2\tau)$, with Stokes phases fixed by (3.40). When the parameters are integers satisfying $s_1+s_2\equiv\kappa_1+\kappa_2+1\pmod 2$, the perturbative part terminates and the transseries is proved from the Fricke action on twisted Eisenstein series. The payoff is a unifying exact description that includes the sunset Feynman integral and the weak/strong resurgent structures of topological-string spectral traces as special cases of one quantum-modular identity.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the two-parameter Lambert series with doubly twisted divisor function, written in Mellin-Barnes form $\int \Gamma(t)L(\chi_{r_1},t+s_1)L(\chi_{r_2},t+s_2)(2\pi y)^{-t}\,dt/(2\pi i)$. Its small-$y$ expansion is a factorially divergent power series whose Borel transform is a combination of hypergeometric ${}_2F_1(1-s_1,1-s_2,1;\pm t)$ functions; the discontinuity of ${}_2F_1$ across its branch cut produces the Stokes automorphism and the exponentially suppressed tower. In the truncating cases the differential identity $(q\frac{d}{dq})^{s_1}\Xi_{s_1,s_2}=G_m(\chi_{r_1},\chi_{r_2};q)-A_m$ identifies the series with iterated integrals of twisted Eisenstein series, and the Fricke relation $G_m(\chi_{r_1},\chi_{r_2};\tau)=i^{\kappa_1+\kappa_2}\epsilon(\chi_{r_1})\epsilon(\chi_{r_2})r_1^{\frac12-m}r_2^{-\frac12}\tau^{-m}G_m(\bar\chi_{r_2},\bar\chi_{r_1};-1/(r_1r_2\tau))$ turns the transseries into an integrated form of Fricke involution.

What would settle it

Evaluate both sides of (3.46) for generic complex parameters (for instance $s_1=1/3$, $s_2=2/5$) with a real primitive character such as $\chi_{3,2}$ and a non-real one such as $\chi_{5,2}$, at small real $y$, and compare the first exponentially small term against the phase (3.40); a mismatch would disprove the generic transseries. The paper reports agreement at 100 digits in tested cases, so any decisive check must probe new parameter values or provide an independent derivation of $\sigma_{\pm}$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For primitive characters and generic $s_1,s_2\in\mathbb{C}$, the paper asserts the exact transseries (3.46): $$\Xi_{s_1,s_2}(\chi_{r_1},\chi_{r_2};\tau)=S_-\,[\$Xi^{{\mathrm{Pert}}$}_{s_1,s_2}](\chi_{r_1},\chi_{r_2};\tau)+$r_1^{{\frac12-s_1}}$$r_2^{{\frac12-s_2}}$\epsilon(\chi_{r_1})\epsilon(\chi_{r_2})$i^{{\kappa_1+\kappa_2}}$\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(s_1)_n(s_2)_n}{n!}\frac{(r_1r_2\tau)^{s_1+s_2+n-1}}{(-2\pi i)^n}\,\Xi_{s_1+n,s_2+n}\left(\bar\chi_{r_2},\bar\chi_{r_1};-\frac{1}{r_1r_2\tau}\right),$$ with Stokes phase $\sigma_{\pm}=\exp(\mp i(s_1+s_2+\kappa_1+\kappa_2-1)\pi/2)$ from (3.40). This is a quantum-modular version of Fricke involution: the modularity gap is analytic in the upper half-plane, and the non-perturbative tower is a Fricke-dual copy with shifted exponents and conjugated, exchanged characters. When $s_1,s_2\in\mathbb{Z}$ satisfy $s_1+s_2\equiv\kappa_1+\kappa_2+1\pmod 2$, the perturbative part truncates to a Laurent polynomial and the transseries is proved from the Fricke action on twisted Eisenstein series via Eichler integrals. The imprimitive case is a finite divisor sum given in (3.52).

Load-bearing premise

The generic-parameter result rests on the unproved claim that the Stokes phase exponentiates to $\sigma_{\pm}=\exp(\mp i(s_1+s_2+\kappa_1+\kappa_2-1)\pi/2)$; the paper states that it has not proved this and relies on 100-digit numerical checks, whereas the integer-parity cases proved in Section 4 do not use it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For primitive characters and generic parameters, (3.46) provides an exact identity valid for all $\tau$ with $\mathrm{Im}\,\tau>0$, not merely an asymptotic statement as $\tau\to i\infty$.
  • In the integer-parity cases the transseries is proven and shows that the non-perturbative terms survive even when the perturbative series terminates (Cheshire-cat resurgence), as in (4.3)-(4.4).
  • The vector-valued form built from the towers transforms under Fricke with an analytic modularity gap, realizing quantum modularity.
  • The $s=1$ cases with $\chi_{3,2}$ and $\chi_{4,3}$ reproduce the weak- and strong-coupling resurgent expansions of the first fermionic spectral traces of local $P^2$ and local $P_{m,n}$, including their Stokes constants.
  • Imprimitive characters are handled by divisor sums: each imprimitive transseries is a finite linear combination of primitive ones, e.g. the level-6 identity (5.60).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the exponentiated phase (3.40) survives further testing, the same transseries mechanism should apply to other character-twisted divisor generating functions, including triple-character generalizations, wherever the Mellin-Barnes integrand has only gamma and Dirichlet L-function poles.
  • Beyond the paper: the Fricke-dual structure suggests that the sunset and kite Feynman period families obey the same two-character transseries, with the Stokes phase controlled only by $s_1+s_2+\kappa_1+\kappa_2$; this could be checked order by order in dimensional regularization.
  • Beyond the paper: for non-real primitive characters the phase $\sigma_{\pm}$ is genuinely complex, so comparing the real and imaginary parts of the median resummation at finite $y$ with the complex-conjugated tower in (3.45) offers a numerical criterion that distinguishes the exponentiation conjecture from alternative Stokes constants.
  • Beyond the paper: the Laurent-polynomial modularity gaps in Section 4 should match period polynomials of the relevant twisted Eisenstein series, and the eta-quotient patterns in Tables 1 and 2 may extend to higher levels as a classification problem in its own right.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the two-parameter double Lambert series Ξ_{s1,s2}(χr1,χr2;q) defined in (1.1) and proposes a complete transseries expansion as q→1−. For primitive characters and generic complex s1,s2 it claims (3.46), expressing the series as a lateral Borel resummation of the perturbative series plus a non-perturbative tower of Fricke-inverted series, with Stokes phase (3.40). For integer parameters satisfying the parity condition (3.19), the perturbative series terminates and the transseries is derived from the Fricke involution on twisted Eisenstein series in Section 4. The paper also treats imprimitive characters (3.52), presents many explicit modular primitives and eta quotients in Section 5, and connects the s=1 cases with quantum dilogarithms and topological-string spectral traces in Section 6.

Significance. If fully established, the generic transseries would be a substantial extension of the authors' earlier Lambert-series work [1] to arbitrary Dirichlet characters, giving a vector-valued quantum-modular structure with explicit non-perturbative terms and a modularity gap. The paper contains a large amount of explicit, checkable material: the parity-restricted transseries identity (4.2), the Fricke relations (4.8), the eta-quotient tables in Section 5, and the dilogarithm identities in Section 6. These proven cases are genuine and useful, and the detailed examples are a strength of the paper. The main caveat is that the generic claim is conditional on an unproved conjecture, so the paper's stated contribution needs to be reclassified and its abstract qualified.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.1, Eqs. (3.39)–(3.41), (3.46)] The complete transseries for generic parameters is not proved. The computation of the Stokes discontinuity in (3.36)–(3.37) fixes only the coefficient of sin(...), i.e. the imaginary part of the Stokes constant, as the paper itself writes in (3.39). The real part, equivalently the amplitude of the non-perturbative term S0[ΞNP], is undetermined. Equation (3.40) is introduced as a conjecture, and the text explicitly states: 'We have not proved that the transseries parameter σ exponentiates in accordance with (3.40).' Since (3.41) and (3.46) are the central generic results, the abstract's 'exact resurgent transseries expansion' overstates the proven content. The authors should either prove (3.40) or state the generic theorem as conditional on a named conjecture.
  2. [§3.1, Eqs. (3.28)–(3.34)] The Borel-resummation derivation is set up for real parameters s1,s2 ('The task at hand is to define an unambiguous resummation ... when the parameters (s1,s2) are real numbers'), but the theorem is then stated for all s1,s2∈C in (3.46) and in the abstract. The analytic continuation in s1,s2 of the lateral resummations, and the constancy of the Stokes phase (3.40) under that continuation, are not addressed. The domain of the generic claim therefore lacks support as it stands.
  3. [§4, final paragraph] The statement 'our general result in (3.41), with exact non-perturbative terms in (3.44), holds for all s1,s2 ∈ C' is not supported by the proof in Section 4, which covers only the terminating integer cases with m=s1−s2+1≡κ1+κ2 mod 2. For generic parameters the non-perturbative amplitude is fixed only by conjecture (3.40), so the general claim should be explicitly separated from the proven parity-restricted cases.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3, Eq. (3.8)] In (3.8) and the following display (3.9), the second L-factor is written with χr1 rather than χr2; the correct Mellin–Barnes kernel should be L(χr1,t+s1)L(χr2,t+s2), as is clear from (3.2) and from the later formulas (3.23)–(3.27).
  2. [§3.1, Eq. (3.39)] The equation 'Im σ± = ∓i sin(...)' is dimensionally inconsistent: for a complex number σ, Im σ is real. Presumably the intended statement is that the coefficient of the non-perturbative jump is ∓ sin(...), or that the imaginary part of σ± equals ∓ sin(...).
  3. [§3.1, numerical verification] The claimed 100-digit numerical verification of (3.40) is not documented with any reproducible example, parameter set, or code. Since this conjecture carries the main generic result, at least one high-precision table or reproducible script should be included.
  4. [§3, after Eq. (3.52)] There is a typo in the sentence 'Before moving on to study impritive characters': 'impritive' should be 'imprimitive'.
  5. [§3, Eqs. (3.14)–(3.15)] The unified perturbative formula (3.14) uses the generic symbol χr for both L-factors; for clarity it should be written explicitly as L(χr1,s1−k)L(χr2,s2−k), and the coefficient A_{s1,s2} in (3.15) should display L(χr1,s1+1−s2).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular reduction: the generic transseries is conditional on an explicitly unproved Stokes phase, while the terminating cases are proven independently via Fricke involution.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained up to the Mellin–Barnes representation (3.8), the residue expansion (3.14), and the Borel–Écalle resummation (3.32)–(3.38). The Stokes discontinuity (3.36)–(3.37) is computed from the hypergeometric discontinuity, and the non-perturbative term (3.44) is an exact integral expression. The only load-bearing assumption for generic s1, s2 is the exponentiation conjecture (3.40), for which only the imaginary part of the jump, (3.39), is derived. The paper states this plainly: 'We have not proved that the transseries parameter σ exponentiates in accordance with (3.40).' This is a proof gap and an overstatement of the abstract's claim of an exact transseries for generic parameters, but it is not a circularity: the conjectured phase is not defined to be the output, and it is supported by independent numerical checks. For the terminating cases of Section 4, the Stokes phase reduces to ±1 by (4.1), and the transseries is proven from the Fricke action on twisted Eisenstein series via Eichler integrals and period polynomials, not from the conjecture. The citation of the authors' earlier work [1] provides the untwisted special case and a prior conjectural precedent, but it is not used as a uniqueness theorem or as the sole justification of the new twisted results. Section 6 additionally reproduces external topological-string expansions from [2, 3], providing independent benchmarks. No step was found in which a prediction is equivalent to an input by construction or in which a fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central generic claim rests on one unproved conjecture (the Stokes phase); everything else uses standard arithmetic function theory, Mellin-Barnes, and Borel-Ecalle machinery. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • Stokes phase σ± = σ± = exp(∓ i (s1+s2+κ1+κ2−1)π/2)
    Introduced ad hoc to complete the transseries; imaginary part is fixed by the computed Stokes discontinuity, while the real part is conjectured and verified numerically at 100 decimal digits (Section 3.1, Eq. (3.40)).
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Primitive Dirichlet characters satisfy the functional equation (A.7) with Gauss sum ϵ(χr).
    Used to rewrite the perturbative series in (3.23) as a sum over L(χ̄, k+1-s).
  • standard math Mellin-Barnes representation (3.8) and residue expansion are valid for the relevant ranges; zeta and L-function values at negative integers are known.
    Provides the perturbative expansion (3.14).
  • standard math Borel-Ecalle resummation, lateral resummations S±, and median resummation correctly reconstruct the function from its formal asymptotic series.
    Underpins the transseries construction (3.34)-(3.41).
  • ad hoc to paper The transseries parameter σ exponentiates as in (3.40).
    Unproved conjecture, numerically checked at 100 digits; load-bearing for the generic transseries (3.46).
  • domain assumption Tangential-basepoint regularization prescription R i∞_τ τ1^k dτ1 = -τ^{k+1}/(k+1) for iterated Eisenstein integrals.
    Needed in Section 4.2 to define Eichler integrals at the cusp; standard in the theory of multiple modular values [8].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Resurgent Lambert series with characters." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JISRN5YE

@misc{pith2026250721352,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Resurgent Lambert series with characters},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JISRN5YE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.21352}
}
abstract

We consider certain Lambert series as generating functions of divisor sums twisted by Dirichlet characters and compute their exact resurgent transseries expansion near $q=1^-$. For special values of the parameters, these Lambert series are expressible in terms of iterated integrals of holomorphic Eisenstein series twisted by the same characters and the transseries representation is a direct consequence of the action of Fricke involution on such twisted Eisenstein series. When the parameters of the Lambert series are generic the transseries representation provides for a quantum-modular version of Fricke involution which for a particular example we show being equivalent to modular resurgent structures found in topological strings observables.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Resurgent Lambert series from Feynman and beyond

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Sunrise/banana Feynman integrals and topological-string spectral traces are Lambert series twisted by Dirichlet characters; the P^{m,n} case with conductor N=m+n+1 splits into terminating even-character contributions ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Resurgent expansion of Lambert series and iterated Eisenstein integrals

    D. Dorigoni and A. Kleinschmidt, “Resurgent expansion of Lambert series and iterated Eisenstein integrals,” Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 15 (2021) no.1, 1-57 [ 2001.11035 [hep-th]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

  2. [2]

    Resurgence, Stokes constants, and arithmetic functions in topological string theory,

    C. Rella, “Resurgence, Stokes constants, and arithmetic functions in topological string theory,” Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 17 (2023) no.3, 709-820 [ 2212.10606 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Strong-weak symmetry and quantum modularity of resurgent topological strings on local P2,

    V. Fantini and C. Rella, “Strong-weak symmetry and quantum modularity of resurgent topological strings on local P2,” Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 19 (2025) no.1, 1-73 [2404.10695 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Modular resurgence, q-Pochhammer symbols, and quantum operators from mirror curves,

    V. Fantini and C. Rella, “Modular resurgence, q-Pochhammer symbols, and quantum operators from mirror curves,” [ 2506.08265 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  5. [5]

    Modular resurgent structures,

    V. Fantini and C. Rella, “Modular resurgent structures,” [ 2404.11550 [math.NT]]

    arXiv

  6. [6]

    Les Fonctions Resurgentes,

    J. Ecalle, “Les Fonctions Resurgentes,” vol. I - III. Publ. Math. Orsay, 1981

    work page 1981

  7. [7]

    Resurgent methods in semi-classical asymptotics,

    E. Delabaere and F. Pham, “Resurgent methods in semi-classical asymptotics,” Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Phys. Th´ eor.71 (1999) 1

    work page 1999

  8. [8]

    Multiple Modular Values and the relative completion of the fundamental group of M1,1,

    F. Brown, “Multiple Modular Values and the relative completion of the fundamental group of M1,1,” [1407.5167v4 [math.NT]]

    arXiv

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    A class of non-holomorphic modular forms I,

    F. Brown, “A class of non-holomorphic modular forms I,” Res. Math. Sc. 5 (2018) 7 [1707.01230 [math.NT]]

    2018 arXiv

  2. [10]

    A class of non-holomorphic modular forms II : equivariant iterated Eisenstein inte- grals,

    F. Brown, “A class of non-holomorphic modular forms II : equivariant iterated Eisenstein inte- grals,” [1708.03354 [math.NT]]

    arXiv

  3. [11]

    Relations between elliptic multiple zeta values and a special derivation algebra,

    J. Broedel, N. Matthes and O. Schlotterer, “Relations between elliptic multiple zeta values and a special derivation algebra,” J. Phys. A 49 (2016) no.15, 155203 [ 1507.02254 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Elliptic symbol calculus: from elliptic polylogarithms to iterated integrals of Eisenstein series,

    J. Broedel, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, B. Penante and L. Tancredi, “Elliptic symbol calculus: from elliptic polylogarithms to iterated integrals of Eisenstein series,” JHEP 1808 (2018) 014 [ 1803.10256 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  5. [13]

    From elliptic multiple zeta values to modular graph functions: open and closed strings at one loop,

    J. Broedel, O. Schlotterer and F. Zerbini, “From elliptic multiple zeta values to modular graph functions: open and closed strings at one loop,” JHEP 1901 (2019) 155 [1803.00527 [hep-th]]. 62

    2019 arXiv

  6. [14]

    One-Loop String Scattering Amplitudes as Iterated Eisenstein Integrals,

    J. Broedel and O. Schlotterer, “One-Loop String Scattering Amplitudes as Iterated Eisenstein Integrals,” Proceedings of KMPB Conference: Elliptic Integrals, Elliptic Functions and Modular Forms in Quantum Field Theory

  7. [15]

    Modular graph forms from equivariant iterated Eisenstein integrals,

    D. Dorigoni, M. Doroudiani, J. Drewitt, M. Hidding, A. Kleinschmidt, N. Matthes, O. Schlotterer and B. Verbeek, “Modular graph forms from equivariant iterated Eisenstein integrals,” JHEP 12 (2022), 162 [ 2209.06772 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Non-holomorphic modular forms from zeta generators,

    D. Dorigoni, M. Doroudiani, J. Drewitt, M. Hidding, A. Kleinschmidt, O. Schlotterer, L. Schneps and B. Verbeek, “Non-holomorphic modular forms from zeta generators,” JHEP 10 (2024), 053 [2403.14816 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    The elliptic dilogarithm for the sunset graph,

    S. Bloch and P. Vanhove, “The elliptic dilogarithm for the sunset graph,” J. Number Theor. 148 (2015), 328-364 [ 1309.5865 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Feynman integrals and iterated integrals of modular forms,

    L. Adams and S. Weinzierl, “Feynman integrals and iterated integrals of modular forms,” Com- mun. Num. Theor. Phys. 12 (2018), 193-251 [ 1704.08895 [hep-ph]]

    2018 arXiv

  11. [19]

    From modular forms to differential equations for Feynman integrals,

    J. Broedel, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, B. Penante and L. Tancredi, “From modular forms to differential equations for Feynman integrals,” Proceedings of KMPB Conference: Elliptic Integrals, Elliptic Functions and Modular Forms in Quantum Field Theory [ 1807.00842 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    The soaring kite: a tale of two punctured tori,

    M. Giroux, A. Pokraka, F. Porkert and Y. Sohnle, “The soaring kite: a tale of two punctured tori,” JHEP 05 (2024), 239 [ 2401.14307 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Twisted elliptic multiple zeta values and non-planar one-loop open-string amplitudes,

    J. Broedel, N. Matthes, G. Richter and O. Schlotterer, “Twisted elliptic multiple zeta values and non-planar one-loop open-string amplitudes,” J. Phys. A 51 (2018) no.28, 285401 [ 1704.03449 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Elliptic modular graph forms II: Iterated integrals,

    M. Hidding, O. Schlotterer and B. Verbeek, “Elliptic modular graph forms II: Iterated integrals,” [2208.11116 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    Deconstructing zero: resurgence, supersymmetry and complex saddles,

    G. V. Dunne and M. ¨Unsal, “Deconstructing zero: resurgence, supersymmetry and complex saddles,” JHEP 1612 (2016) 002 [ 1609.05770 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Cheshire Cat resurgence, Self- resurgence and Quasi-Exact Solvable Systems,

    C. Koz¸ caz, T. Sulejmanpasic, Y. Tanizaki and M. ¨Unsal, “Cheshire Cat resurgence, Self- resurgence and Quasi-Exact Solvable Systems,” Commun. Math. Phys. 364 (2018) 835 [1609.06198 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  17. [25]

    The LMFDB Collaboration, the L-functions and modular forms database

  18. [26]

    D. B. Zagier, The Mellin transform and other useful analytic techniques, Appendix to E. Zeidler, Quantum Field Theory I: Basics in Mathematics and Physics. A Bridge Between Mathematicians and Physicists. 63

  19. [27]

    An Introduction to Resurgence, Trans-Series and Alien Calculus,

    D. Dorigoni, “An Introduction to Resurgence, Trans-Series and Alien Calculus,” Annals Phys. 409 (2019), 167914 [ 1411.3585 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Transseries for Beginners,

    G. A. Edgar, “Transseries for Beginners,” Real Anal. Exchange, Vol 35, (2009) no. 2, 253-310. [0801.4877 [math.RA]]

    2009 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Quantum modular forms,

    D. Zagier, “Quantum modular forms,” In: Quanta of Math: Conference in honor of Alain Connes, Clay Mathematics Proceedings 11, AMS and Clay Mathematics Institute (2010), 656–675

    2010

  22. [30]

    The grin of Cheshire cat resurgence from supersymmetric localization,

    D. Dorigoni and P. Glass, “The grin of Cheshire cat resurgence from supersymmetric localization,” SciPost Phys. 4 (2018) 012 [ 1711.04802 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Picard-Lefschetz decomposition and Cheshire Cat resurgence in 3D N = 2 field theories,

    D. Dorigoni and P. Glass, “Picard-Lefschetz decomposition and Cheshire Cat resurgence in 3D N = 2 field theories,” JHEP 12 (2019), 085 [ 1909.05262 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Poincar´ e series for modular graph forms at depth two. Part I. Seeds and Laplace systems,

    D. Dorigoni, A. Kleinschmidt and O. Schlotterer, “Poincar´ e series for modular graph forms at depth two. Part I. Seeds and Laplace systems,” JHEP 01 (2022), 133 [ 2109.05017 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Poincar´ e series for modular graph forms at depth two. Part II. Iterated integrals of cusp forms,

    D. Dorigoni, A. Kleinschmidt and O. Schlotterer, “Poincar´ e series for modular graph forms at depth two. Part II. Iterated integrals of cusp forms,” JHEP 01 (2022), 134 [ 2109.05018 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  26. [34]

    BPS Dendroscopy on Local P2,

    P. Bousseau, P. Descombes, B. Le Floch and B. Pioline, “BPS Dendroscopy on Local P2,” Com- mun. Math. Phys. 405 (2024) no.4, 108 [ 2210.10712 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Real-analytic modular forms for Γ 0(N ) and their L-series

    J. Drewitt and J. Pimm, “Real-analytic modular forms for Γ 0(N ) and their L-series”, Journal of Number Theory 271 (2025), 1-32 [ 2310.01127 [math.NT]]

    2025 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Equivariant primitives of Eisenstein series for congruence subgroups,

    C. Duhr and F. Lippert, “Equivariant primitives of Eisenstein series for congruence subgroups,” [2502.04752 [math.NT]]

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    A cubic counterpart of Jacobi’s identity and the AGM,

    J. M. Borwein and P. B. Borwein, “A cubic counterpart of Jacobi’s identity and the AGM,” Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 323 (1991), no. 2, 691-701

    1991

  30. [38]

    Eta Quotients and Rademacher Sums,

    K. Acres and D. Broadhurst, “Eta Quotients and Rademacher Sums,” In: Bl¨ umlein, J., Schnei- der, C., Paule, P. (eds) Elliptic Integrals, Elliptic Functions and Modular Forms in Quantum Field Theory. Texts & Monographs in Symbolic Computation

  31. [39]

    Quantum Dilogarithm,

    L. D. Faddeev and R. M. Kashaev, “Quantum Dilogarithm,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A9 (1994), 427-434 [hep-th/9310070 [hep-th]]

    1994 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Operators from mirror curves and the quantum dilogarithm,

    R. Kashaev and M. Marino, “Operators from mirror curves and the quantum dilogarithm,” Commun. Math. Phys. 346 (2016) no.3, 967-994 [ 1501.01014 [hep-th]]. 64

    2016 arXiv

  33. [41]

    H. L. Montgomery and R. C. Vaughan, Multiplicative Number Theory I. Classical Theory, Cam- bridge University Press

  34. [42]

    Some properties of Dirichlet L-series

    I. J. Zucker and M. M. Robertson, “Some properties of Dirichlet L-series”, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 9 1207

  35. [43]

    Hida, Elementary theory of L-functions and Eisenstein series, Cambridge University Press

    H. Hida, Elementary theory of L-functions and Eisenstein series, Cambridge University Press

  36. [44]

    Miyake, Modular forms, Springer Monographs in Mathematics

    T. Miyake, Modular forms, Springer Monographs in Mathematics. 65

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.