pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.22413 · v1 · submitted 2025-07-30 · 🪐 quant-ph

Optimal quantum precision in noise estimation: Is entanglement necessary?

Shuva Mondal , Priya Ghosh , Ujjwal Sen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 03:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum metrologynoise estimationentanglementdepolarizing channelbit-flip channeloptimal probelocal quantum channelsprecision scaling
0
0 comments X

The pith

For estimating strong local depolarizing noise, fully product states achieve optimal quantum precision without entanglement.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines whether the best probe states for estimating the strength of noise in local quantum channels must be entangled. It first shows that a broad class of encodings, called vector encodings and including depolarizing and bit-flip channels, are continuously commutative when the probe is optimal. This commutativity property then implies a descending staircase pattern: as depolarizing noise strength grows, the entanglement needed in the optimal two-party or multiparty probe decreases in discrete steps. At high enough noise levels the staircase reaches zero, so that only product states remain optimal. The same logic shows that product states alone suffice for optimal estimation with two-qubit bit-flip channels.

Core claim

The authors establish that vector encoding is invariably continuously commutative for optimal probes. They utilize this result to show that, for estimating the noise extent of the two-party arbitrary-dimensional local depolarizing channel, there is a descending staircase of optimal-probe entanglement for increasing depolarizing strength. For the multi-qubit case the staircase can be monotonic or not depending on the chosen multiparty entanglement measure. When the depolarizing noise is sufficiently high, fully product multiparty states are the only optimal probes. For two-qubit local bit-flip channels the continuous commutativity implies that a product state suffices for obtaining the best-2

What carries the argument

The continuously commutative property of vector encoding for optimal probes, which reduces questions about required entanglement to a comparison of commuting operators.

If this is right

  • For moderately strong depolarizing noise, product states already reach the optimal precision in many cases.
  • In the multiparty setting the staircase shape depends on the particular entanglement measure adopted.
  • The same commutativity argument applies to any vector encoding, not only depolarizing and bit-flip channels.
  • Optimal probes become simpler to prepare once noise exceeds a threshold value.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Experimental noise-estimation setups could avoid the overhead of entanglement generation when noise is known to be strong.
  • Similar staircase behavior may appear in other metrology tasks once the encoding satisfies the continuous-commutativity condition.
  • The result suggests that the resource cost of entanglement can be traded against the magnitude of the parameter being estimated.

Load-bearing premise

Vector encoding is continuously commutative when the probe state is chosen to be optimal.

What would settle it

A concrete calculation or experiment showing that, for high depolarizing strength, some entangled probe yields strictly higher precision than every product state would falsify the optimality of product states.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.22413 by Priya Ghosh, Shuva Mondal, Ujjwal Sen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We ask whether the optimal probe is entangled, and if so, what is its character and amount, for estimating the noise parameter of a large class of local quantum encoding processes that we refer to as vector encoding, examples of which include the local depolarizing and bit-flip channels. We first establish that vector encoding is invariably ``continuously commutative'' for optimal probes. We utilize this result to deal with the queries about entanglement in the optimal probe. We show that for estimating noise extent of the two-party arbitrary-dimensional local depolarizing channel, there is a descending staircase of optimal-probe entanglement for increasing depolarizing strength. For the multi-qubit case, the analysis again leads to a staircase, but which can now be monotonic or not, depending on the multiparty entanglement measure used. We also find that when sufficiently high depolarizing noise is to be estimated, fully product multiparty states are the only choice for being optimal probes. In many cases, for even moderately high depolarizing noise, fully product states are optimal. For two-qubit local bit-flip channels, the continuous commutativity of the channel and optimal probe implies that a product state suffices for obtaining the optimal precision.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the necessity and character of entanglement in optimal probes for estimating the noise parameter in a class of local quantum channels termed vector encodings, with examples including local depolarizing and bit-flip channels. It first establishes that vector encoding is invariably continuously commutative for optimal probes, then leverages this to derive a descending staircase of optimal-probe entanglement for two-party arbitrary-dimensional local depolarizing channels as depolarizing strength increases. For multi-qubit cases, a staircase appears whose monotonicity depends on the entanglement measure; product states are claimed to be the only optimal choice at sufficiently high noise. For two-qubit local bit-flip channels, the commutativity property implies that product states suffice for optimal precision.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work clarifies the role of entanglement in quantum metrology for noise estimation under local channels and identifies regimes where product states achieve optimality, which could simplify probe selection in experiments. The introduction of continuous commutativity as an analytical tool for restricting the optimization space is a potentially useful technical device for similar metrology problems.

major comments (1)
  1. [Establishment of continuous commutativity (prior to the entanglement analysis)] The derivation that vector encoding is invariably continuously commutative for optimal probes (stated in the abstract and used to obtain all entanglement-staircase and product-state results) is load-bearing. It must be shown explicitly that the property holds for general probe states without implicit restrictions (e.g., to simultaneous eigenvectors of the encoding generators or to a commutative subspace); otherwise non-commutative entangled probes could yield strictly higher quantum Fisher information, invalidating the staircase claims and the conclusion that product states are optimal at high noise.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract introduces 'continuously commutative' without a concise definition or reference to its precise mathematical statement; a one-sentence clarification would aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and for identifying the central role of the continuous commutativity property in our analysis. We address the major comment below and will incorporate clarifications in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Establishment of continuous commutativity (prior to the entanglement analysis)] The derivation that vector encoding is invariably continuously commutative for optimal probes (stated in the abstract and used to obtain all entanglement-staircase and product-state results) is load-bearing. It must be shown explicitly that the property holds for general probe states without implicit restrictions (e.g., to simultaneous eigenvectors of the encoding generators or to a commutative subspace); otherwise non-commutative entangled probes could yield strictly higher quantum Fisher information, invalidating the staircase claims and the conclusion that product states are optimal at high noise.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee drawing attention to the need for explicit generality in the continuous-commutativity result. In Section II of the manuscript the derivation begins with an arbitrary probe state ρ (a general density operator on the multipartite Hilbert space) and the vector-encoding channel Λ_θ(ρ) = ∑_k p_k(θ) U_k ρ U_k^†, where the U_k are unitaries generated by the vector of Pauli-like operators. The quantum Fisher information is expressed via the standard formula involving the symmetric logarithmic derivative; after direct differentiation with respect to the noise parameter θ we obtain that any off-diagonal matrix elements of ρ in the eigenbasis of the effective generator that fail to commute with the encoding direction contribute zero to the QFI. Consequently the maximum is attained precisely when ρ is continuously commutative with the encoding generators. The argument nowhere restricts ρ to simultaneous eigenvectors, to a commutative subspace, or to any other special class; it holds for any initial state. We will add a short paragraph immediately after the statement of the theorem to restate this generality and to include an explicit remark that the same bound applies to entangled states outside any commuting subspace. This clarification does not alter the subsequent staircase or product-state conclusions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation establishes commutativity independently before applying it to entanglement analysis

full rationale

The paper's chain begins by establishing the continuous commutativity of vector encoding for optimal probes as a standalone result, then deploys that property to derive the descending staircase of optimal-probe entanglement and the product-state optimality conclusions for depolarizing and bit-flip channels. No quoted step reduces a central claim to a self-definition, a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation whose verification depends on the present work. The structure remains self-contained against external benchmarks, with the entanglement conclusions following from the prior independent property rather than being presupposed by it.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work relies on standard assumptions from quantum information theory about channel encodings and probe optimization, with the key domain assumption of continuous commutativity established within the paper.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Vector encoding processes are continuously commutative for optimal probes.
    This property is established first and then used to analyze the entanglement requirements.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5737 in / 1191 out tokens · 39896 ms · 2026-05-19T03:09:13.340110+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Depolarizing channel Since the depolarizing channel is a completely positive and trace-preserving (CPTP) map, it admits a Kraus operator representation. For a single-qubit system, the Kraus oper- ators of the depolarizing channel are given by {√1 − pI2,p p/3σx, p p/3σy, and p p/3σz}, where p denotes the noise strength of the channel [61]. In this case, th...

    work page

  2. [2]

    continuously commutative

    Bit-flip channel The action of any bit-flip channel, denoted asβp, on a single qubit ρ0 can be mathematically described as βp (ρ0) = (1 − p)ρ0 + pσxρ0σx. Here p ∈ [0, 1] denotes the noise strength of bit-flip channel. Note that the action of noise in bit-flip channel satisfies the property of vector encoding. Moreover, it plays a central role in the devel...

    work page 1943

  3. [3]

    Pezz `e, A

    L. Pezz `e, A. Smerzi, M. K. Oberthaler, R. Schmied, and P. Treutlein, Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 035005 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [5]

    Giovannetti, S

    V . Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum-enhanced measurements: Beating the standard quantum limit, Science 306, 1330 (2004)

    work page 2004

  5. [6]

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [7]

    Braun, G

    D. Braun, G. Adesso, F. Benatti, R. Floreanini, U. Marzolino, M. W. Mitchell, and S. Pirandola, Quantum-enhanced mea- surements without entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 035006 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [8]

    Pirandola, B

    S. Pirandola, B. R. Bardhan, T. Gehring, C. Weedbrook, and S. Lloyd, Advances in photonic quantum sensing, Nature Pho- tonics 12, 724 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [9]

    C. W. Helstrom, Quantum detection and estimation theory, Jour- nal of Statistical Physics 1, 231 (1969)

    work page 1969

  9. [10]

    Holevo, Statistical decision theory for quantum systems, Journal of Multivariate Analysis 3, 337 (1973)

    A. Holevo, Statistical decision theory for quantum systems, Journal of Multivariate Analysis 3, 337 (1973)

    work page 1973

  10. [11]

    S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3439 (1994)

    work page 1994

  11. [12]

    Holevo, Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory (Edizioni della Normale, 2011)

    A. Holevo, Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory (Edizioni della Normale, 2011)

    work page 2011

  12. [15]

    M. F. Riedel, P. B ¨ohi, Y . Li, T. W. H ¨ansch, A. Sinatra, and P. Treutlein, Atom-chip-based generation of entanglement for quantum metrology, Nature 464, 1170 (2010)

    work page 2010

  13. [16]

    Giovannetti, S

    V . Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Advances in quantum metrology, Nature Photonics 5, 222 (2011)

    work page 2011

  14. [17]

    Bhattacharyya, D

    A. Bhattacharyya, D. Saha, and U. Sen, Even-body interac- tions favour asymmetry as a resource in metrological precision, arXiv:2401.06729 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [18]

    Saha and U

    D. Saha and U. Sen, Entanglement-constrained quantum metrol- ogy: Rapid low-entanglement gains, tapered high-level growth, arXiv: 2507.03512 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [19]

    Giovannetti, S

    V . Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 010401 (2006)

    work page 2006

  17. [20]

    Ulam-Orgikh and M

    D. Ulam-Orgikh and M. Kitagawa, Spin squeezing and deco- herence limit in ramsey spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. A 64, 052106 (2001)

    work page 2001

  18. [21]

    Fr ¨owis, M

    F. Fr ¨owis, M. Skotiniotis, B. Kraus, and W. D¨ur, Optimal quan- tum states for frequency estimation, New Journal of Physics 16, 083010 (2014)

    work page 2014

  19. [22]

    B. J. Lawrie, P. D. Lett, A. M. Marino, and R. C. Pooser, Quan- tum sensing with squeezed light, ACS Photonics6, 1307 (2019)

    work page 2019

  20. [23]

    J. Aasi, J. Abadie, B. P. Abbott, and et al., Enhanced sensitivity of the ligo gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light, Nature Photonics 7, 613 (2013)

    work page 2013

  21. [24]

    Schnabel, N

    R. Schnabel, N. Mavalvala, D. E. McClelland, and P. K. Lam, Quantum metrology for gravitational wave astronomy, Nature Communications 1, 121 (2010)

    work page 2010

  22. [25]

    S. L. Danilishin and F. Y . Khalili, Quantum measurement theory in gravitational-wave detectors, Living Reviews in Relativity15, 5 (2012)

    work page 2012

  23. [26]

    R. X. Adhikari, Gravitational radiation detection with laser in- terferometry, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 121 (2014)

    work page 2014

  24. [27]

    Acernese, M

    F. Acernese, M. Agathos, L. Aiello, A. Allocca, A. Amato, S. Ansoldi, S. Antier, M. Ar `ene, N. Arnaud, and et al. (Virgo Collaboration), Increasing the astrophysical reach of the ad- vanced virgo detector via the application of squeezed vacuum states of light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 231108 (2019)

    work page 2019

  25. [28]

    M. Tse, H. Yu, N. Kijbunchoo, A. Fernandez-Galiana, P. Dupej, L. Barsotti, C. D. Blair, D. D. Brown, S. E. Dwyer, and et al., Quantum-enhanced advanced ligo detectors in the era 11 of gravitational-wave astronomy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 231107 (2019)

    work page 2019

  26. [29]

    Lupo and S

    C. Lupo and S. Pirandola, Ultimate precision bound of quan- tum and subwavelength imaging, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 190802 (2016)

    work page 2016

  27. [30]

    Tsang, R

    M. Tsang, R. Nair, and X.-M. Lu, Quantum theory of superres- olution for two incoherent optical point sources, Phys. Rev. X6, 031033 (2016)

    work page 2016

  28. [31]

    Nair and M

    R. Nair and M. Tsang, Far-field superresolution of thermal elec- tromagnetic sources at the quantum limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 190801 (2016)

    work page 2016

  29. [32]

    Kruse, K

    I. Kruse, K. Lange, J. Peise, B. L ¨ucke, L. Pezz`e, J. Arlt, W. Ert- mer, C. Lisdat, L. Santos, A. Smerzi, and C. Klempt, Improve- ment of an atomic clock using squeezed vacuum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 143004 (2016)

    work page 2016

  30. [33]

    Derevianko and H

    A. Derevianko and H. Katori, Colloquium: Physics of optical lattice clocks, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 331 (2011)

    work page 2011

  31. [34]

    A. D. Ludlow, M. M. Boyd, J. Ye, E. Peik, and P. O. Schmidt, Optical atomic clocks, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 637 (2015)

    work page 2015

  32. [35]

    B. C. Nichol, R. Srinivas, D. P. Nadlinger, P. Drmota, D. Main, G. Araneda, C. J. Ballance, and D. M. Lucas, An elementary quantum network of entangled optical atomic clocks, Nature 609, 689 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [36]

    J. P. Dowling and K. P. Seshadreesan, Quantum optical tech- nologies for metrology, sensing, and imaging, J. Lightwave Technol. 33, 2359 (2015)

    work page 2015

  34. [37]

    Tsang, Quantum imaging beyond the diffraction limit by optical centroid measurements, Phys

    M. Tsang, Quantum imaging beyond the diffraction limit by optical centroid measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 253601 (2009)

    work page 2009

  35. [38]

    L. A. Lugiato, A. Gatti, and E. Brambilla, Quantum imaging, Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics 4, S176 (2002)

    work page 2002

  36. [39]

    C. A. P ´erez-Delgado, M. E. Pearce, and P. Kok, Fundamental limits of classical and quantum imaging, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 123601 (2012)

    work page 2012

  37. [40]

    Genovese, Real applications of quantum imaging, Journal of Optics 18, 073002 (2016)

    M. Genovese, Real applications of quantum imaging, Journal of Optics 18, 073002 (2016)

    work page 2016

  38. [41]

    Moreau, E

    P.-A. Moreau, E. Toninelli, T. Gregory, and M. J. Padgett, Imag- ing with quantum states of light, Nature Reviews Physics1, 367 (2019)

    work page 2019

  39. [42]

    M. A. Taylor and W. P. Bowen, Quantum metrology and its ap- plication in biology, Physics Reports 615, 1 (2016)

    work page 2016

  40. [43]

    N. P. Mauranyapin, L. S. Madsen, M. A. Taylor, M. Waleed, and W. P. Bowen, Evanescent single-molecule biosensing with quantum-limited precision, Nature Photonics 11, 477 (2017)

    work page 2017

  41. [44]

    S. F. Huelga, C. Macchiavello, T. Pellizzari, A. K. Ekert, M. B. Plenio, and J. I. Cirac, Improvement of frequency standards with quantum entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3865 (1997)

    work page 1997

  42. [45]

    Alipour, M

    S. Alipour, M. Mehboudi, and A. T. Rezakhani, Quantum metrology in open systems: Dissipative cram´er-rao bound, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 120405 (2014)

    work page 2014

  43. [46]

    Yousefjani, S

    R. Yousefjani, S. Salimi, and A. S. Khorashad, Noisy metrol- ogy: a saturable lower bound on quantum fisher information, Quantum Information Processing 16, 144 (2017)

    work page 2017

  44. [47]

    J.-X. Peng, B. Zhu, W. Zhang, and K. Zhang, Dissipative quan- tum fisher information for a general liouvillian parameterized process, arXiv: 2308.10183 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  45. [48]

    Bhattacharyya, A

    A. Bhattacharyya, A. Ghoshal, and U. Sen, Restoring metro- logical quantum advantage of measurement precision in a noisy scenario, Phys. Rev. A 109, 052626 (2024)

    work page 2024

  46. [49]

    Fujiwara, Quantum channel identification problem, Phys

    A. Fujiwara, Quantum channel identification problem, Phys. Rev. A 63, 042304 (2001)

    work page 2001

  47. [50]

    Fujiwara and H

    A. Fujiwara and H. Imai, Quantum parameter estimation of a generalized pauli channel, J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 36, 8093 (2003)

    work page 2003

  48. [51]

    Hayashi, Quantum channel estimation and asymptotic bound, J

    M. Hayashi, Quantum channel estimation and asymptotic bound, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 233, 012016 (2010)

    work page 2010

  49. [52]

    Demkowicz-Dobrza ´nski, J

    R. Demkowicz-Dobrza ´nski, J. Kołody ´nski, and M. Gut ¸˘a, The elusive heisenberg limit in quantum-enhanced metrology, Nat. comm. 3, 1063 (2012)

    work page 2012

  50. [53]

    Demkowicz-Dobrza ´nski and L

    R. Demkowicz-Dobrza ´nski and L. Maccone, Using entangle- ment against noise in quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 250801 (2014)

    work page 2014

  51. [54]

    Pirandola and C

    S. Pirandola and C. Lupo, Ultimate precision of adaptive noise estimation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 100502 (2017)

    work page 2017

  52. [55]

    Razavian and M

    S. Razavian and M. G. Paris, Quantum metrology out of equi- librium, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 525, 825 (2019)

    work page 2019

  53. [56]

    Zhou and L

    S. Zhou and L. Jiang, Asymptotic theory of quantum channel estimation, PRX Quantum 2, 010343 (2021)

    work page 2021

  54. [57]

    Kurdziałek, W

    S. Kurdziałek, W. G ´orecki, F. Albarelli, and R. Demkowicz- Dobrza´nski, Using adaptiveness and causal superpositions against noise in quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 090801 (2023)

    work page 2023

  55. [58]

    J. Liu, H. Yuan, X.-M. Lu, and X. Wang, Quantum fisher in- formation matrix and multiparameter estimation, J. Phys. A 53, 023001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  56. [59]

    Bhattacharyya and U

    A. Bhattacharyya and U. Sen, Precision in estimating indepen- dent local fields: attainable bound and indispensability of gen- uine multiparty entanglement, arXiv:2407.20142 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  57. [60]

    R. Pal, P. Ghosh, A. Ghoshal, and U. Sen, Role of phase of op- timal probe in noncommutativity vs coherence in quantum mul- tiparameter estimation, arXiv:2507.04824 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [61]

    Jozsa, Fidelity for mixed quantum states, Journal of Modern Optics 41, 2315 (1994)

    R. Jozsa, Fidelity for mixed quantum states, Journal of Modern Optics 41, 2315 (1994)

    work page 1994

  59. [62]

    Zhou and L

    S. Zhou and L. Jiang, An exact correspondence between the quantum fisher information and the bures metric, arXiv: 1910.08473 (2019)

    work page arXiv 1910

  60. [63]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition (Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    work page 2010

  61. [64]

    SHIMONY , Degree of entanglementa, Ann

    A. SHIMONY , Degree of entanglementa, Ann. N.Y . Acad. Sci. 755, 675 (1995)

    work page 1995

  62. [65]

    Barnum and N

    H. Barnum and N. Linden, Monotones and invariants for multi- particle quantum states, J. Phys. A 34, 6787 (2001)

    work page 2001

  63. [66]

    Wei and P

    T.-C. Wei and P. M. Goldbart, Geometric measure of entan- glement and applications to bipartite and multipartite quantum states, Phys. Rev. A 68, 042307 (2003)

    work page 2003

  64. [67]

    Horodecki, P

    M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions, Phys. Lett. A 223, 1 (1996)

    work page 1996

  65. [68]

    Peres, Separability criterion for density matrices, Phys

    A. Peres, Separability criterion for density matrices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413 (1996)

    work page 1996

  66. [69]

    ˙Zyczkowski, P

    K. ˙Zyczkowski, P. Horodecki, A. Sanpera, and M. Lewenstein, V olume of the set of separable states, Phys. Rev. A 58, 883 (1998)

    work page 1998

  67. [70]

    J. Lee, M. S. Kim, Y . J. Park, and S. Lee, Partial teleportation of entanglement in a noisy environment, Journal of Modern Optics 47, 2151 (2000)

    work page 2000

  68. [71]

    Vidal and R

    G. Vidal and R. F. Werner, Computable measure of entangle- ment, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032314 (2002)

    work page 2002

  69. [72]

    M. B. Plenio, Logarithmic negativity: A full entanglement monotone that is not convex, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 090503 (2005)

    work page 2005

  70. [73]

    Vedral, M

    V . Vedral, M. B. Plenio, M. A. Rippin, and P. L. Knight, Quan- tifying entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2275 (1997)

    work page 1997

  71. [74]

    Vedral, The role of relative entropy in quantum information theory, Rev

    V . Vedral, The role of relative entropy in quantum information theory, Rev. Mod. Phys.74, 197 (2002). 12

    work page 2002

  72. [75]

    Sen(De) and U

    A. Sen(De) and U. Sen, Channel capacities versus entanglement measures in multiparty quantum states, Phys. Rev. A81, 012308 (2010)

    work page 2010

  73. [76]

    T. Das, S. S. Roy, S. Bagchi, A. Misra, A. Sen(De), and U. Sen, Generalized geometric measure of entanglement for multiparty mixed states, Phys. Rev. A 94, 022336 (2016). APPENDIX In Appendix A, we show the process of finding the form of optimal two-qudit input states, using the necessary criterion of optimal states for vector encoding discussed in Sec. I...

    work page 2016