Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 26 references

Exploring Dynamic Parameters for Vietnamese Gender-Independent ASR

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that polar-coordinate features computed in SSCF ratio planes, plus a pseudo-F0 from the lowest spectral band, lower Vietnamese ASR word error rates and shrink gender gaps.

desk verdict The paper has a useful empirical result on Vietnamese ASR, but the claimed 'ratio-plane' angle is mathematically identical to the raw polar angle, so the central novelty is an overclaim. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.22964 v1 pith:WX2YZPTI submitted 2025-07-30 eess.AS cs.CLcs.SDeess.SP

classification eess.AScs.CLcs.SDeess.SP
keywords speechdynamicsacousticgesturegender-independentrecognitiontonallanguagelow-resourcespectralsubbandcentroidfrequencypolarcoordinatesVietnameseASR
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that dynamic speech information, encoded as polar coordinates in ratio planes of Spectral Subband Centroid Frequencies (SSCFs), makes Vietnamese automatic speech recognition more accurate and less dependent on speaker gender. The authors add these polar-ratio features to a six-dimensional MFCC baseline and use SSCF0, the lowest subband centroid, as a stand-in for pitch to carry tonal information. On a 17-hour Vietnamese corpus, the best configuration lowers word error rate from 12.77% to 9.50% in mixed-gender training and from 14.06% to 11.05% in male-only training, while reaching or beating a 13-MFCC baseline with fewer coefficients. If the claim holds, low-resource tonal ASR can get a cheap, speaker-variation-resistant feature set without explicit pitch tracking.

What carries the argument

The central object is the polar-ratio parameter: for each frame, the SSCFs (spectral subband centroid frequencies, weighted mean frequencies per subband, with SSCF0 tracking the lowest band) are placed in the two ratio planes SSCF1/SSCF3 and SSCF2/SSCF3, and the transition dynamics are summarized by the polar radius $r=\sqrt{SSCF_{i+1}^2+SSCF_i^2}$ and angle $\theta=\arctan(SSCF_{i+1}/SSCF_i)$ computed against the current subband pair. These coordinates avoid the discontinuity of a raw transition angle while capturing the direction and magnitude of spectral movement. The normalized SSCF0, mean-and-variance normalized within each utterance, is appended as a pseudo-F0 for tonal information. The ratio-plane construction carries the argument because it is the mechanism intended to suppress gender-dependent spectral variation.

What would settle it

Take the same Vietnamese corpus and measure true formant frequencies and F0; if the SSCF1/SSCF3 and SSCF2/SSCF3 ratios scatter by gender as much as the absolute SSCFs do, or if SSCF0 correlates poorly with measured F0, then the gender-independence claim is not supported and the WER gains could come from added feature dimensions or normalization rather than from the ratio mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the direction and magnitude of spectral transitions, measured as polar radius and angle in the SSCF1/SSCF3 and SSCF2/SSCF3 ratio planes, preserve phonetic information that is relatively invariant across male and female speakers, and that the lowest SSCF subband can serve as a pseudo fundamental frequency for Vietnamese tones. Combined with six MFCCs and their deltas, the proposed parameters reach 9.50% word error in mixed-gender training, 11.05% in male-only training, and 11.01% in female-only training. The gender gap is smaller than the 13-MFCC baseline in all three training conditions and smaller than the six-MFCC baseline in mixed-gender and female-only training. The authors conclude that these dynamic features are a more gender-independent acoustic representation for Vietnamese than absolute-frequency cepstral coefficients.

Load-bearing premise

The method assumes that the ratio of two frequency-band locations removes male-female vocal-tract differences for Vietnamese speech just as formant ratios do for English vowels, and that the lowest frequency band can stand in for vocal pitch; neither is checked against direct formant or F0 measurements on this corpus.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A six-MFCC system fitted with polar-ratio and SSCF0 features can beat a 13-MFCC baseline in cross-gender Vietnamese recognition, suggesting that feature design can substitute for extra filter-bank resolution in low-resource settings.
  • Training on one gender only generalizes better to the other gender with these features: male-only training drops from 14.06% to 11.05% WER on a mixed test set.
  • Tonal ASR can avoid fragile explicit pitch extraction if SSCF0 reliably carries pitch-related information.
  • The same ratio-plane recipe, if the gender-invariance premise holds, is a candidate for other tonal and low-resource languages.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The gender-invariance rationale is borrowed from English formant-ratio data, so the mechanism would be on firmer ground if tested on real Vietnamese formant measurements; the paper does not report such a check.
  • Because the polar-ratio addition also raises the feature dimension, part of the WER gain could come from the extra dimensions rather than from gender-invariant structure; a control with matched numbers of decorrelated features would isolate the mechanism.
  • If SSCF0 is a good pitch proxy, the same pseudo-F0 idea may transfer to other tone languages, but only after comparing it against measured F0 on continuous speech.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes new acoustic features for Vietnamese ASR: polar-coordinate parameters (radius and angle) computed in a 'ratio plane' of Spectral Subband Centroid Frequencies (SSCF1/SSCF3 and SSCF2/SSCF3), a pseudo-F0 feature based on SSCF0, and combinations of these with MFCCs. The features are evaluated on a 17-hour, 28-speaker Vietnamese corpus using a Kaldi DNN-HMM system with 7-fold cross-validation under TrainMix, TrainMale, and TrainFemale conditions. The paper reports that the proposed feature sets reduce word error rates relative to 6- and 13-dimensional MFCC baselines and exhibit smaller male-female WER gaps in several conditions, e.g., 9.50% versus 12.77% in TrainMix and 11.05% versus 14.06% in TrainMale for the full proposed system.

Significance. If the reported improvements are statistically reliable, the work offers a low-cost, hand-crafted feature alternative for low-resource and tonal language ASR, with the practical advantage of not requiring explicit F0 tracking. The experimental design is transparent: feature equations are explicit, the Kaldi recipe is standard, and the three training/test gender configurations directly address the gender-independence claim. The main weaknesses are that the central theoretical motivation for the ratio plane is undermined by a mathematical identity, the WER comparisons lack significance testing or error bars, and the pseudo-F0 contribution is not validated against measured pitch. These issues make the central claim currently unverified rather than proven.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5, Table 3] The proposed polar parameters in the ratio plane (SSCF1/SSCF3, SSCF2/SSCF3) are mathematically equivalent to the raw SSCF1-SSCF2 polar parameters up to a frame-wise radial rescaling. For positive SSCF3, Eq. (4) gives arctan((SSCF2/SSCF3)/(SSCF1/SSCF3)) = arctan(SSCF2/SSCF1), which is exactly the angle in the raw SSCF1-SSCF2 plane, and Eq. (3) gives sqrt(SSCF1^2+SSCF2^2)/SSCF3, i.e., the raw radius divided by SSCF3. Thus the ratio plane introduces no new angular or directional dynamics, and the Peterson-style ratio-invariance mechanism invoked from [19] is not actually implemented in the angle. The small and inconsistent differences between the Polar and Polar-Ratio rows in Table 3 (e.g., TrainMix 9.89 vs. 9.94; TrainMale 11.78 vs. 11.64; TrainFemale 11.77 vs. 11.53) should therefore be attributed to the radial rescaling, not to ratio-based angle invariance. The authors should either correct the derivation, define a genuinely different ratio-plane angle, or reframe the contribution as a radial normalization effect.
  2. [Section 3.2] The paper repeatedly claims that the proposed parameters 'significantly reduce' word error rates and exhibit 'greater gender independence,' but no statistical significance tests, confidence intervals, or per-fold error bars are reported. The 7-fold cross-validation is described, but Table 3 reports only a single WER point per condition, so the reader cannot assess whether the differences (e.g., 9.50% vs. 12.77% in TrainMix) are stable across folds or driven by a particular split. The authors should report per-fold results, standard deviations, and paired significance tests (e.g., matched-pairs or bootstrap) for the key comparisons, especially given the small corpus of 28 speakers and 17 hours.
  3. [Section 4.2] The use of SSCF0 as a pseudo-F0 is asserted without comparing it to a standard F0 estimate or to pitch-tracker output, and without any analysis isolating tonal errors. The conclusion that 'SSCF0 enhances Vietnamese speech recognition by capturing valuable information related to the fundamental frequency' is therefore not directly supported. To justify this claim, the authors should show that SSCF0 tracks F0 on a held-out sample, or present an ablation or error analysis demonstrating that the benefit of adding SSCF0 is concentrated in tonal distinctions rather than in general spectral information.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 1] There is a typo: 'sparse datasets' appears as 'spare datasets' in the sentence about low-resource languages.
  2. [Section 3] The statement that 'only the SSCF1-SSCF2 plane was chosen' and that 'other SSCF planes do not improve the recognition results' is not accompanied by any supporting data. Either provide a small ablation table or remove the unsupported claim.
  3. [Section 2] Equation (2) defines the angle from end-to-start differences of a whole transition, while Eqs. (3)-(4) define frame-wise polar parameters from instantaneous SSCF values. The relationship between these two formulations should be clarified, since the frame-wise features are what is used in the ASR experiments.
  4. [Section 5] The phrase 'making the parameters greater independent' should be 'making the parameters more gender-independent' or similar.
  5. [Section 3] The text says in Section 3 that the previous polar parameters 'achieved higher word error rates than the MFCCs' on French data; this phrasing is ambiguous because 'higher' means worse, and the following sentence explains that the polar parameters omit detailed information. Consider rephrasing to clearly state that the earlier features alone were less accurate than MFCCs.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The proposed 'polar-ratio' angle is identical by construction to the previously reported raw SSCF1–SSCF2 polar angle; the ratio-plane novelty reduces to a radial rescaling, and the gender-independence rationale imports same-group prior results.

  1. renaming known result [Section 3.1, Eqs. (3)-(4) and the definition of the ratio plane (SSCF1/SSCF3, SSCF2/SSCF3)]
    "P olar-Anglei,i+1(j) = 180◦/π arctan(SSCF i+1(j)/SSCF i(j)) (4) ... Building on this finding, we propose computing the polar parameters in the ratio plane of SSCF1/SSCF3 and SSCF2/SSCF3."

    Replacing SSCF_i(j) and SSCF_{i+1}(j) in Eq. (4) with SSCF1/SSCF3 and SSCF2/SSCF3 algebraically yields arctan((SSCF2/SSCF3)/(SSCF1/SSCF3)) = arctan(SSCF2/SSCF1), which is exactly the Polar-Angle of the raw SSCF1–SSCF2 plane; SSCF3 cancels in the arctan. The radius becomes sqrt(SSCF1^2+SSCF2^2)/SSCF3, a frame-wise rescaling of the raw radius. Hence the 'ratio-plane dynamics' carry no new angular information; the Table 3 Polar vs Polar-Ratio differences are attributable only to this radial scaling, not to a Peterson-style ratio-invariance mechanism. The claimed new contribution is therefore equivalent to the known raw SSCF1–SSCF2 polar parameters under a coordinate renaming, with a scaled radius.

  2. self citation load bearing [Section 2 and Section 3.1]
    "According to the study, the average angles for both male and female speakers are similar, with small standard deviation at different speaking rates for each transition ... Building on this finding, we propose computing the polar parameters in the ratio plane of SSCF1/SSCF3 and SSCF2/SSCF3."

    The gender-independence premise motivating the ratio plane is imported from prior same-group work [24] (Tran's Grenoble thesis) and the authors' own [10]. Since the angle in the proposed ratio plane is algebraically identical to the raw SSCF1–SSCF2 angle, the new 'ratio-plane' variant does not independently re-derive or test the gender-independence property; it inherits it from the self-cited result. The paper presents [24] as established fact, but the algebraic identity shows the central novelty adds no new angular content to that cited result, making the self-citation load-bearing for the gender-independence claim.

full rationale

The central numerical results are not circular in the usual fitted-parameter sense: the features are defined by fixed equations and evaluated on held-out cross-validation folds, and the full Polar-Ratio+SSCF0-MVN system does improve WER over MFCC baselines. However, the paper's signature contribution, the 'ratio plane' of SSCF1/SSCF3 and SSCF2/SSCF3, collapses by construction: substituting these ratio coordinates into the paper's own Eq. (4) yields the same polar angle as the raw SSCF1–SSCF2 plane, and the radius is merely the raw radius divided by SSCF3. Thus the claimed Peterson-inspired ratio-invariance mechanism is not actually implemented in the angular dynamics; the difference between the 'Polar' and 'Polar-Ratio' rows in Table 3 can only reflect the radial rescaling, not new directional information. The gender-independence motivation is also loaded from same-group prior work ([10], [24]) rather than independently established for the new feature. These are concrete reductions of the paper's own equations, not speculation. Because the empirical evaluation and the full feature combination retain independent content, the overall circularity is partial rather than total, supporting a score of 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical or mathematical entities; it repurposes existing SSCF features and prior findings. The main hidden costs are the hand-selected SSCF plane and normalization mode, plus several domain assumptions borrowed from prior studies without targeted validation.

free parameters (3)
  • SSCF pair plane index = SSCF1-SSCF2
    The authors state that other SSCF planes (SSCF2-SSCF3, etc.) do not improve recognition results, so the SSCF1-SSCF2 plane was selected on the same evaluation data. This is a hand-chosen, post-hoc selection.
  • SSCF0 normalization mode = mean-variance normalization (MVN)
    MVN of SSCF0 was chosen because it yielded the best results among the tested variants; this is a data-driven choice rather than an a priori motivated one.
  • MFCC dimensionality used in the combination = 6
    The proposed features are attached to 6 MFCCs rather than 13, allowing a lower-dimensional feature set while claiming comparable or better performance. This choice affects the comparison and the 'fewer parameters' claim.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math SSCF definition in Eq. (1) from Paliwal (1998) is meaningful for speech recognition.
    The paper adopts the spectral subband centroid frequency definition from prior literature; this is standard acoustic feature extraction, not in dispute.
  • domain assumption Spectral transition angles on SSCF planes are relatively independent of speaker gender and speaking rate.
    The polar parameters are motivated by Tran's 2016 thesis (ref [24]) showing angle independence for vowel-to-vowel transitions. This is a background empirical assumption from a different study, taken as given.
  • domain assumption Formant ratios F1/F3 and F2/F3 are relatively stable across men, women, and children, and this property transfers to SSCF ratios in Vietnamese.
    Peterson's 1951 study on American English vowels is cited to justify the ratio plane. The paper extends this to Vietnamese SSCFs without empirical validation of ratio invariance on the target corpus.
  • domain assumption SSCF0 serves as a pseudo-F0 that captures tonal information in Vietnamese.
    Section 3.2 asserts that SSCF0 can replace the fundamental frequency for tone-related information, but no comparison with measured F0 or pitch errors is provided.
  • domain assumption The 17-hour MICA corpus with 28 speakers is sufficient and representative for drawing conclusions about cross-gender ASR.
    The experimental claims rely on this small corpus; the authors do not justify its representativeness or the stability of 7-fold CV across such few speakers.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exploring Dynamic Parameters for Vietnamese Gender-Independent ASR." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WX2YZPTI

@misc{pith2026250722964,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exploring Dynamic Parameters for Vietnamese Gender-Independent ASR},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WX2YZPTI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.22964}
}
read the original abstract

The dynamic characteristics of speech signal provides temporal information and play an important role in enhancing Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR). In this work, we characterized the acoustic transitions in a ratio plane of Spectral Subband Centroid Frequencies (SSCFs) using polar parameters to capture the dynamic characteristics of the speech and minimize spectral variation. These dynamic parameters were combined with Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs) in Vietnamese ASR to capture more detailed spectral information. The SSCF0 was used as a pseudo-feature for the fundamental frequency (F0) to describe the tonal information robustly. The findings showed that the proposed parameters significantly reduce word error rates and exhibit greater gender independence than the baseline MFCCs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.22964 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The average angles of 14 vowel-to-vowel transitions on the SSCF1-SSCF2 plane produced by Vietnamese speakers at different speaking rates (source [24]). positive and negative, producing noise and instability during transitions (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The angles of the /ai/ transition on the SSCF1-SSCF2 plane produced by a female Vietnamese speaker. The red dots represent the start and end points of angle inversion during the transition caused by the arctan function. P olar-Radiusi,i+1(j) = p SSCFi+1(j) 2 + SSCFi(j) 2 (3) P olar-Anglei,i+1(j) = 180◦ π arctan(SSCFi+1(j) SSCFi(j) ) (4) Where SSCFi(j) corresponds to the SSCFi at frame j of the transition. 2 [PITH_F… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. ). This highlights the importance of formant transitions and dynamic shifts in vowel articulation, reinforcing the role of formant ratios as an acoustic correlate of vowel perception [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The polar parameters (radius and angle) of /ai/ transition on the SSCF1-SSCF2 plane produced by a female Vietnamese speaker. 3 Proposed Method The polar parameters proposed by [10] were evaluated using a French dataset [25] for speech recognition. The study showed that…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [19]

    The phonetic value of vowels

    Gordon E Peterson. The phonetic value of vowels. Lan- guage, pages 541–553, 1951

  2. [1]

    Reconnaissance de la parole par mod ´elisation des gestes

    A Alliot. Reconnaissance de la parole par mod ´elisation des gestes. Stage de fin d ´etudes–Mica, Vietnam, 2009

  3. [2]

    Automatic speech recognition and speech variability: A review

    Mohamed Benzeghiba, Renato De Mori, Olivier Deroo, Stephane Dupont, Teodora Erbes, Denis Jouvet, Luciano 5 AUTHOR VERSION Fissore, Pietro Laface, Alfred Mertins, Christophe Ris, et al. Automatic speech recognition and speech variability: A review. Speech communication, 49(10-11):763–786, 2007

  4. [3]

    Automatic speech recognition for under- resourced languages: A survey

    Laurent Besacier, Etienne Barnard, Alexey Karpov, and Tanja Schultz. Automatic speech recognition for under- resourced languages: A survey. Speech communication, 56:85–100, 2014

  5. [4]

    Signal dynamics in the production and per- ception of vowels

    Ren´e Carr´e. Signal dynamics in the production and per- ception of vowels. 2009), Approaches to phonological complexity, Berl´ın-Nueva York, Mouton de Gruyter, pages 59–81, 2009

  6. [5]

    Speech: A dynamic process

    Ren´e Carr ´e, Pierre Divenyi, and Mohamad Mrayati. Speech: A dynamic process. In Speech: A dynamic pro- cess. de Gruyter, 2017

  7. [6]

    The kaldi speech recog- nition toolkit

    Arnab Ghoshal and Daniel Povey. The kaldi speech recog- nition toolkit. IEEE 2011Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding, 2011

  8. [7]

    The state of the art of feature extraction techniques in speech recognition

    Divya Gupta, Poonam Bansal, and Kavita Choudhary. The state of the art of feature extraction techniques in speech recognition. Speech and language processing for human-machine communications, pages 195–207, 2018

Show all 26 references
  1. [8]

    V ocal tract acoustics.Journal of Voice, 7(2):97–117, 1993

    Raymond D Kent. V ocal tract acoustics.Journal of Voice, 7(2):97–117, 1993

  2. [9]

    Automatic speech recognition features extraction techniques: A multi-criteria comparison

    Maria Labied and Abdessamad Belangour. Automatic speech recognition features extraction techniques: A multi-criteria comparison. International Journal of Ad- vanced Computer Science and Applications, 12(8), 2021

  3. [10]

    Preliminary study on sscf-derived polar coordinate for asr

    Sotheara Leang, Eric Castelli, Dominique Vaufreydaz, and Sethserey Sam. Preliminary study on sscf-derived polar coordinate for asr. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.01245, 2022

  4. [11]

    End-to-end articu- latory attribute modeling for low-resource multilingual speech recognition

    Sheng Li, Chenchen Ding, Xugang Lu, Peng Shen, Tat- suya Kawahara, and Hisashi Kawai. End-to-end articu- latory attribute modeling for low-resource multilingual speech recognition. In Interspeech, pages 2145–2149, 2019

  5. [12]

    Efficient cepstral normalization for robust speech recognition

    Fu-Hua Liu, Richard M Stern, Xuedong Huang, and Ale- jandro Acero. Efficient cepstral normalization for robust speech recognition. In Human Language Technology: Proceedings of a Workshop Held at Plainsboro, New Jer- sey, March 21-24, 1993, 1993

  6. [13]

    V owel reduction in conversational speech in french: The role of lexical factors

    Christine Meunier and Robert Espesser. V owel reduction in conversational speech in french: The role of lexical factors. Journal of Phonetics, 39(3):271–278, 2011

  7. [14]

    Articulatory features from deep neural networks and their role in speech recog- nition

    Vikramjit Mitra, Ganesh Sivaraman, Hosung Nam, Carol Espy-Wilson, and Elliot Saltzman. Articulatory features from deep neural networks and their role in speech recog- nition. In 2014 IEEE international conference on acous- tics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP), pages 3017–

  8. [15]

    Joint modeling of articulatory and acoustic spaces for continuous speech recognition tasks

    Vikramjit Mitra, Ganesh Sivaraman, Chris Bartels, Ho- sung Nam, Wen Wang, Carol Espy-Wilson, Dimitra Ver- gyri, and Horacio Franco. Joint modeling of articulatory and acoustic spaces for continuous speech recognition tasks. In 2017 IEEE international conference on acous- tics,...

  9. [16]

    Articulatory information and multiview features for large vocabulary continuous speech recognition

    Vikramjit Mitra, Wen Wang, Chris Bartels, Horacio Franco, and Dimitra Vergyri. Articulatory information and multiview features for large vocabulary continuous speech recognition. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 5...

  10. [17]

    To- wards improving low-resource speech recognition using articulatory and language features

    Markus M¨uller, Sebastian St¨uker, and Alex Waibel. To- wards improving low-resource speech recognition using articulatory and language features. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Spoken Language Translation, 2016

  11. [18]

    Spectral subband centroid features for speech recognition

    Kuldip K Paliwal. Spectral subband centroid features for speech recognition. In Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP’98 (Cat. No. 98CH36181), volume 2, pages 617–620. IEEE, 1998

  12. [20]

    End-to-end speech recog- nition: A survey

    Rohit Prabhavalkar, Takaaki Hori, Tara N Sainath, Ralf Schl¨uter, and Shinji Watanabe. End-to-end speech recog- nition: A survey. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 2023

  13. [21]

    A review on different approaches for speech recog- nition system

    Suman K Saksamudre, PP Shrishrimal, and RR Desh- mukh. A review on different approaches for speech recog- nition system. International Journal of Computer Appli- cations, 115(22), 2015

  14. [22]

    A com- parative analysis of pitch detection methods under the influence of different noise conditions

    Lyudmila Sukhostat and Yadigar Imamverdiyev. A com- parative analysis of pitch detection methods under the influence of different noise conditions. Journal of voice, 29(4):410–417, 2015

  15. [23]

    An overview of speaker identification: Accuracy and robustness issues

    Roberto Togneri and Daniel Pullella. An overview of speaker identification: Accuracy and robustness issues. IEEE circuits and systems magazine, 11(2):23–61, 2011

  16. [24]

    Acoustic gesture modeling

    Thi-Anh-Xuan Tran. Acoustic gesture modeling. Appli- cation to a Vietnamese speech recognition system. PhD thesis, Universit´e Grenoble Alpes (ComUE), 2016

  17. [25]

    A new methodology for speech corpora definition from internet documents

    Dominique Vaufreydaz, Carole Bergamini, Jean-Franc ¸ois Serignat, Laurent Besacier, and Mohamad Akbar. A new methodology for speech corpora definition from internet documents. In LREC’2000 (Language Resources & Eval- uation international Conference), pages pp–423, 2000

  18. [26]

    How to learn a new 6 AUTHOR VERSION language? an efficient solution for self-supervised learn- ing models unseen languages adaption in low-resource scenario

    Shih-Heng Wang, Zih-Ching Chen, Jiatong Shi, Ming-To Chuang, Guan-Ting Lin, Kuan-Po Huang, David Harwath, Shang-Wen Li, and Hung-yi Lee. How to learn a new 6 AUTHOR VERSION language? an efficient solution for self-supervised learn- ing models unseen languages adaption in low-r...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.