Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 64 references

Probing Bound State Relaxation Dynamics in Systems Out-of-Equilibrium on Quantum Computers

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper extends an ancilla-free functional-derivative response scheme to time-dependent Hamiltonians and shows that local magnetization measurements can track mesonic bound states and Bloch oscillations in the mixed-field Ising chain…

desk verdict A credible extension of the authors' ancilla-free response method to time-dependent Hamiltonians, undercut by a missing direct validation of the extracted χR against the exact commutator. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.22988 v1 pith:EUCUE2RT submitted 2025-07-30 quant-ph cond-mat.otherhep-lat

Heba A. Labib , Goksu Can Toga , J. K. Freericks , A. F. Kemper This is my paper
classification quant-phcond-mat.otherhep-lat
keywords pump-probespectroscopylinearresponsefunctionalderivativesmixed-fieldIsingmodelmesonicboundstatesBlochoscillationsfalsevacuumdecayancilla-freequantumsimulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that pump-probe spectroscopy can be simulated on quantum computers for systems driven out of equilibrium, with no ancillary qubits. The authors extend a functional-derivative linear-response scheme to time-dependent Hamiltonians: a pump pulse kicks the mixed-field Ising chain out of equilibrium, and weak probe pulses arriving at successive times let them extract the retarded response function from local magnetization measurements alone. The scheme tracks how mesonic bound states, confined kink-antikink pairs, shift and proliferate as a confining field relaxes, and in the false-vacuum case it separates Bloch oscillations, the lattice-induced oscillations that block bubble growth, from the bound-state spectrum using frequency-selective probes. If correct, the approach gives a practical route to studying relaxation dynamics and false vacuum decay on near-term quantum hardware without ancilla-based circuits.

What carries the argument

The central object is the functional-derivative identity that converts a measured linear response into a correlation function: given $\delta A(t) = \int dt'\, \chi_R(t,t')\phi(t')$, the retarded response $\chi_R(t,t') = -i\theta(t-t')\langle\psi_0|[A(t),H'(t')]|\psi_0\rangle$ is obtained by numerically differentiating the measured $\delta A(t)$ with respect to the probe envelope $\phi(t)$. With $A(t)=Z_0(t)$ and $H'=Z_0$, only local magnetization measurements are needed. The out-of-equilibrium extension adds a stream of probes at times $t_p$, introducing a second time axis so that $\chi_R(\omega,t_p)$ shows how the spectrum evolves as the pump relaxes; a frequency-selective probe $\phi(t) \propto e^{-(t-t_p)^2/2\sigma^2}\sin(\omega(t-t_p))$ acts as a filter that isolates Bloch frequencies from nearby mesonic peaks.

What would settle it

Run the same pump-probe protocol on the 12-site chain by exact diagonalization and compare the functional-derivative-extracted $\chi_R(\omega,t_p)$ against a direct evaluation of the retarded commutator $\langle[Z_0(t),Z_0(t_p)]\rangle$ for the full time-dependent Hamiltonian; if the extraction misses peaks present in the direct commutator, or if the claimed Bloch peaks do not sit at equally spaced $\omega = n\cdot 2|h_l(t_p)|(1-h_t^2)^{1/8}$ tracking the relaxing field, the central claim would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that non-equilibrium response functions, correlations of a time-dependent system that no longer has time-translation invariance, can be obtained from local measurements through the functional-derivative linear-response approach. Starting the mixed-field Ising chain in either the true vacuum or the false vacuum, the authors apply a pump that turns on a longitudinal field $h_l(t) = h_l^{\max}\theta(t-t_0)e^{-(t-t_0)/\tau}$ and then send weak probe pulses at various arrival times $t_p$, measuring the local magnetization response $\delta Z_0(t)$. Taking the functional derivative of the response with respect to the probe envelope yields the retarded correlation function $\chi_R(t,t_p)$, and Fourier analysis gives $\chi_R(\omega,t_p)$, tracking the spectrum as the pump dissipates. For the true vacuum, they observe bound-state (meson) energies moving from high to low frequencies as confinement weakens. For the false vacuum, they observe that long-lived oscillations persist even though decay is energetically favored, and identify these with Bloch oscillations, frequencies starting near $\omega_b \approx \chi = 2|h_l|(1-h_t^2)^{1/8}$ with equally spaced harmonics below the mesonic threshold, which a frequency-selective probe isolates clearly. The authors conclude that the method can track relaxation dynamics of systems without time-translation invariance by setting up simulations that resemble pump-probe experiments, without ancillary qubits.

Load-bearing premise

The central assumption is that the chosen time-dependent longitudinal-field profile, a sudden jump to $h_l^{\max}$ followed by an exponential decay with time constant $\tau$, together with an artificial damping factor $e^{-t/\tau}$ applied to the response, faithfully represents how a real pumped system dissipates energy back to equilibrium; the paper gives no microscopic justification and no numerical values for these relaxation times.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Non-equilibrium response functions can be extracted from local $\langle Z\rangle$ measurements alone, so pump-probe simulations on quantum hardware need no ancillary qubits.
  • Probing at multiple arrival times $t_p$ yields a two-time response $\chi_R(\omega,t_p)$ that tracks how the excitation spectrum relaxes even when time-translation invariance is broken.
  • Frequency-selective probes separate spectrally close but physically distinct features, here Bloch oscillations from mesonic bound states, more cleanly than ordinary quench spectroscopy.
  • In the false vacuum, Bloch oscillations, not free bubble growth, are the source of the long-lived oscillations in this finite-size chain, explaining why the metastable state persists.
  • The bound-state spectrum follows the instantaneous confining field: early probe times (large $|h_l|$) show few high-energy confined states, while late times show more numerous low-energy states as confinement fades.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the pump profile $h_l(t)$ and the damping factor $e^{-t/\tau}$ are modeling choices rather than derived from a microscopic bath, the extracted relaxation dynamics is specific to that dissipation model; a different pulse shape or explicit bath coupling could change which oscillations persist, a point the paper leaves untested.
  • The Bloch-oscillation assignment carries a quantitative prediction, peaks at $\omega = n\cdot 2|h_l(t_p)|(1-h_t^2)^{1/8}$, that the paper displays but does not tabulate; checking the harmonic spacing against $h_l(t_p)$ at each probe time would be a direct validation.
  • The same probe-time-axis construction should work with a momentum-selective probe to obtain momentum-resolved response functions, which the authors mention as a next step; such a capability would connect the scheme directly to ARPES-style measurements.
  • On real hardware the ancilla-free gain comes at the cost of many separate experiments, one per probe time $t_p$, so the method trades circuit depth for shot overhead; reusing the evolved state across probes could amortize that cost.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper extends an earlier ancilla-free linear-response quantum simulation method to time-dependent effective Hamiltonians and applies it as a simulated pump-probe experiment to the mixed-field Ising model. The authors study the evolution of confined bound states (mesons) after a longitudinal-field pump that turns on and then relaxes, for both true-vacuum and false-vacuum initial states, using exact diagonalization of a 12-site chain. They extract retarded response functions χR(tp, ω) from the response of a local observable to a weak probe, demonstrate that frequency-selective probes can isolate Bloch oscillations from mesonic peaks, and argue that the approach tracks the relaxation dynamics of a system without time-translation invariance.

Significance. If the central extraction step is valid, the paper offers a practical, ancilla-free route to non-equilibrium response functions on near-term quantum computers, and it provides a concrete demonstration on the mixed-field Ising model with physically interesting phenomenology. The manuscript is generally well organized, and the use of exact diagonalization makes all numerical results reproducible in principle. The explicit comparison of true-vacuum confinement versus false-vacuum Bloch oscillations, and the use of frequency-selective probes, are valuable. However, the key numerical inversion that produces χR(tp, ω) is not validated against an independent exact calculation, and the time-dependent inversion formula is not rigorously justified; these gaps are load-bearing for the paper's main claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III and Appendix A] The central numerical extraction of χR(tp, ω) is never validated against the exact retarded commutator. Equation (7) defines χR(t, t′) = −iθ(t−t′)⟨ψ0|[A(t), H′(t′)]|ψ0⟩, and for an N=12 exact-diagonalization calculation this object is directly computable under the same time-dependent H0(t). The paper instead obtains χR by inverting the convolution in Eq. (A1), dividing by the probe profile in frequency space, and applying an ad hoc damping factor e^{−t/τ}. Appendix A only checks causality (χR(t<tp)=0) and shows how the inverse Fourier transform depends on probe width; it never compares the extracted χR to the exact commutator. Causality is a necessary but not sufficient check, and the uncontrolled effects of finite probe amplitude, finite time sampling, division by φ(ω), and the damping factor could all bias the peak positions and the apparent tp-dependent relaxation shown in Figs. 4–6. A direct comparison for at least one representative tp and probe shape is required to support the paper's quantitative claims.
  2. [Section III, Eq. (8)] The factorization A(ω, tp) = χR(ω, tp)ϕ(ω) is not justified for a time-dependent Hamiltonian. For a general non-equilibrium system, χR(t, t′) depends on both times separately, so the Fourier transform of the convolution in Eq. (6) does not reduce to a simple product with a single function χR(ω, tp). The text introduces tp as the center of the probe pulse, but Eq. (8) is written as if the response function depends only on t−t′ (or as if the probe is perfectly localized). The manuscript should define precisely what χR(ω, tp) means in the time-dependent setting—e.g., a windowed Fourier transform or a short-probe approximation—and state the conditions under which Eq. (8) and the subsequent division by ϕ(ω) are valid. Without this, the inversion procedure that produces every spectrum in the paper is not well defined.
  3. [Eq. (10) and Section III] The relaxation dynamics, which are the main subject of the paper, depend on parameters that are never specified or tested for sensitivity. The pump profile in Eq. (10) contains an unspecified relaxation time τ, and Section III states that a damping factor e^{−t/τ} is added to δA(t) before the functional derivative, again without giving τ or demonstrating that the extracted spectra are insensitive to it. The probe width σ is also not specified for the broadband results. Since the central claim is that the method 'tracks relaxation dynamics,' the quantitative dependence on these choices is load-bearing. The manuscript should provide the numerical values used and, ideally, a short check showing that the main peaks persist under variations of τ and σ.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section II] The section headings 'T rue Vacuum with false vacuum bubbles' and 'F alse vacuum with true vacuum bubbles' contain stray spaces; the same issue appears in Fig. 1's caption ('T racking').
  2. [Section IV B] The text refers to 'Fig. 5(d)' when zooming in on Bloch frequencies, but Fig. 5 appears to have only panels (a)–(c); please correct the cross-reference.
  3. [Throughout] There are several typos, including 'Brillioun zone' in Section II and 'oft' in the Acknowledgments section; a careful proofread is needed.
  4. [Appendix A2] The discussion of frequency-selective probes correctly notes that χR(t<tp) can be nonzero in the extracted signal, but the statement that this 'does not break causality' would be clearer if accompanied by a demonstration that the nonzero pre-tp signal is bounded by the probe width and vanishes in the exact commutator.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the response functions are obtained by stated linear-response inversion, probe profiles are declared inputs, and equilibrium spectra serve as external benchmarks.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. Equations (5)-(8) define the time-dependent linear response and the functional-derivative extraction; Appendix A quotes the exact inversion δZ(t)=∫χR(t,t′)φ(t′)dt′ (Eq. A1) and reports a causality check. No parameter is fitted to the observed peaks, and no predicted peak position is an input renamed as an output. The probe profiles, including the Gaussian and the frequency-selective form of Eq. (11), are stated inputs; centering the selective probe near a Bloch frequency expected from the equilibrium spectra of Figs. 2-3 is a measurement choice, not a fit, and the time-dependent variation of the extracted signal along tp is not encoded in the probe. Reference [23] is prior work by the authors used for context and for the ancilla-free quantum-circuit claim; it is not used here as a substitute for the numerical derivation, which is carried out independently with exact diagonalization. Appendix A validates causality rather than comparing the extracted χR to the exact commutator ⟨ψ0|[Z(t),Z(tp)]|ψ0⟩; this is an omitted validation that bears on correctness, but it is not a circular reduction. Overall, the central claim does not reduce by definition or by self-citation to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard linear response formalism, the two-kink approximation, and a prior interpretation of Bloch oscillations in the false-vacuum regime. No new physical entities are introduced. The main ad hoc elements are the chosen relaxation profile and the artificial damping factor, both of which are essential to the claimed relaxation dynamics but are not derived or fully specified. No parameters are fitted to reproduce the peaks; the response functions are computed directly from time evolution.

free parameters (4)
  • Relaxation time τ in Eq. (10) = not stated
    Controls the exponential decay of the longitudinal field after the pump; central to the claimed relaxation dynamics, but no value or derivation is provided.
  • Damping time constant in e^{-t/τ} applied to δA(t) = not stated
    Introduced to smooth the signal and improve the computed response; affects the linewidths and is not specified.
  • Probe width σ = 0.2, 1, 1.5, 2
    Chosen by hand in different simulations; controls frequency resolution and the background structure in the extracted response function (Appendix A).
  • Maximum longitudinal field hl_max = 0.4 / -0.4
    Selected to reach a high-confinement regime; the qualitative results depend on this amplitude.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Linear response theory applies to the time-dependent Hamiltonian: δA(t) = ∫ dt' χR(t,t') φ(t') + O(φ²).
    Section III, Eqs. (6)-(7); assumes the probe is weak and the response is linear to first order.
  • domain assumption The two-kink approximation and the confining potential V(r) = -χr (Eq. 2) describe the bound-state spectrum of the mixed-field Ising model.
    Section II; used to interpret the spectral peaks as mesonic bound states.
  • domain assumption Bloch oscillations arise at the Brillouin zone boundaries k = ±π in the false-vacuum regime.
    Section II and Refs. 46,51; used to assign the equally spaced low-frequency peaks to Bloch oscillations.
  • ad hoc to paper The exponentially decaying longitudinal field hl(t) = hlmax θ(t-t0) e^{-(t-t0)/τ} represents the dissipative return to equilibrium after the pump.
    Section IV.A, Eq. (10); no microscopic justification for this profile is given, and it directly determines the relaxation dynamics studied.
  • ad hoc to paper Adding a damping factor e^{-t/τ} to δA(t) improves the signal without changing the physical response.
    End of Section III; the factor is introduced to smooth the computed spectra, but its value and its effect on the extracted line shapes are not quantified.
  • domain assumption Exact diagonalization of an N=12 periodic chain captures the relevant finite-size dynamics of the model.
    Section II; all results are obtained for this small system, and the paper claims the dynamics are representative of the physics.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Probing Bound State Relaxation Dynamics in Systems Out-of-Equilibrium on Quantum Computers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EUCUE2RT

@misc{pith2026250722988,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Probing Bound State Relaxation Dynamics in Systems Out-of-Equilibrium on Quantum Computers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EUCUE2RT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.22988}
}
read the original abstract

Pump-probe spectroscopy is a powerful tool for probing response dynamics of quantum many-body systems in and out-of-equilibrium. Quantum computers have proved useful in simulating such experiments by exciting the system, evolving, and then measuring observables to first order, all in one setting. Here, we use this approach to investigate the mixed-field Ising model, where the longitudinal field plays the role of a confining potential that prohibits the spread of the excitations, spinons, or domain walls into space. We study the discrete bound states that arise from such a setting and their evolution under different quench dynamics by initially pumping the chain out of equilibrium and then probing various non-equal time correlation functions. Finally, we study false vacuum decay, where initially one expects unhindered propagation of the ground state, or true vacuum, bubbles into the lattice, but instead sees the emergence of Bloch oscillations that are directly the reason for the long-lived oscillations in this finite-size model. Our work sets the stage for simulating systems out-of-equilibrium on classical and quantum computers using pump-probe experiments without needing ancillary qubits.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.22988 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. We see that increasing hl produces stronger con￾finement (panels a-d), in agreement with Eq. 3. To get the spectrum, we take the Fourier transform of these cor￾relators, which is shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a)), we can study the trend of the decay and the emergent low-frequency oscillations as a function of time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author G. D. \ Mahan ,\ @noop title Many Particle Physics \ ( publisher Springer ,\ address New York, NY10013, USA ,\ year 2010 ) NoStop

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Bruus \ and\ author K

    author author H. Bruus \ and\ author K. Flensberg ,\ @noop title Many-body quantum theory in condensed matter physics: an introduction \ ( publisher OUP Oxford ,\ year 2004 ) NoStop

    work page 2004

  3. [3]

    Freericks \ and\ author A

    author author J. Freericks \ and\ author A. F. \ Kemper ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena \ volume 251 ,\ pages 147104 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Maldonado , author K

    author author P. Maldonado , author K. Carva , author M. Flammer , \ and\ author P. M. \ Oppeneer ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.174439 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 96 ,\ pages 174439 ( year 2017 ) ,\ note publisher: American Physical Society NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.174439 2017

  5. [5]

    Stefanucci \ and\ author R

    author author G. Stefanucci \ and\ author R. van Leeuwen ,\ @noop title Nonequilibrium Many - Body Theory of Quantum Systems : A Modern Introduction ,\ edition 1st \ ed.\ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ year 2013 ) NoStop

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    Tsuji , author T

    author author N. Tsuji , author T. Oka , \ and\ author H. Aoki ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.047403 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 103 ,\ pages 047403 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.047403 2009

  7. [7]

    Xu \ and\ author Y

    author author J. Xu \ and\ author Y. Guo ,\ 10.1088/1367-2630/ac69b2 journal journal New Journal of Physics \ volume 24 ,\ pages 053028 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ac69b2 2022

  8. [8]

    Bloch , author J

    author author I. Bloch , author J. Dalibard , \ and\ author W. Zwerger ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.885 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 80 ,\ pages 885 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.885 2008

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    Krull , author D

    author author H. Krull , author D. Manske , author G. S. \ Uhrig , \ and\ author A. P. \ Schnyder ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.014515 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 90 ,\ pages 014515 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  2. [10]

    Shao , author T

    author author C. Shao , author T. Tohyama , author H.-G. \ Luo , \ and\ author H. Lu ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.195144 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 93 ,\ pages 195144 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  3. [11]

    Cabanillas-Gonzalez , author G

    author author J. Cabanillas-Gonzalez , author G. Grancini , \ and\ author G. Lanzani ,\ @noop journal journal Advanced materials \ volume 23 ,\ pages 5468 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011

  4. [12]

    Fushitani ,\ @noop journal journal Annual Reports Section" C"(Physical Chemistry) \ volume 104 ,\ pages 272 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    author author M. Fushitani ,\ @noop journal journal Annual Reports Section" C"(Physical Chemistry) \ volume 104 ,\ pages 272 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008

  5. [13]

    Zonno , author F

    author author M. Zonno , author F. Boschini , \ and\ author A. Damascelli ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena \ volume 251 ,\ pages 147091 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021

  6. [14]

    Perfetto , author S

    author author E. Perfetto , author S. Bianchi , \ and\ author G. Stefanucci ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 101 ,\ pages 041201 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020

  7. [15]

    author author J. P. \ Revelle , author A. Kumar , \ and\ author A. F. \ Kemper ,\ @noop journal journal Condensed Matter \ volume 4 ,\ pages 79 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019

  8. [16]

    Orenstein \ and\ author J

    author author J. Orenstein \ and\ author J. S. \ Dodge ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.134507 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 92 ,\ pages 134507 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  9. [17]

    author author P. P. \ Mazza , author G. Perfetto , author A. Lerose , author M. Collura , \ and\ author A. Gambassi ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.180302 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 99 ,\ pages 180302 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  10. [18]

    author author A. H. \ Karamlou , author J. Braum \"u ller , author Y. Yanay , author A. Di Paolo , author P. M. \ Harrington , author B. Kannan , author D. Kim , author M. Kjaergaard , author A. Melville , author S. Muschinske , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal npj Quantum Info...

    2022

  11. [19]

    Riera , author C

    author author A. Riera , author C. Gogolin , \ and\ author J. Eisert ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 108 ,\ pages 080402 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012

  12. [20]

    author author N. J. \ Robinson , author A. J. A. \ James , \ and\ author R. M. \ Konik ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.195108 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 99 ,\ pages 195108 ( year 2019 ) ,\ note arXiv:1808.10782 [cond-mat] NoStop

    2019 arXiv

  13. [21]

    author author D. M. \ Kennes , author E. Y. \ Wilner , author D. R. \ Reichman , \ and\ author A. J. \ Millis ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.054506 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 96 ,\ pages 054506 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  14. [22]

    Osborne , author I

    author author J. Osborne , author I. P. \ McCulloch , \ and\ author J. C. \ Halimeh ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.12210 \ ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023

  15. [23]

    Kökcü , author H

    author author E. Kökcü , author H. A. \ Labib , author J. K. \ Freericks , \ and\ author A. F. \ Kemper ,\ 10.1038/s41467-024-47729-z journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 15 ,\ pages 3881 ( year 2024 ) ,\ note publisher: Nature Publishing Group NoStop

    2024 doi

  16. [24]

    Kormos , author M

    author author M. Kormos , author M. Collura , author G. Takács , \ and\ author P. Calabrese ,\ 10.1038/nphys3934 journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 13 ,\ pages 246 ( year 2017 ) ,\ note number: 3 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group NoStop

    2017 doi

  17. [25]

    Lagnese , author F

    author author G. Lagnese , author F. M. \ Surace , author S. Morampudi , \ and\ author F. Wilczek ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.08340 title Detecting a long lived false vacuum with quantum quenches , \ ( year 2023 ),\ note arXiv:2308.08340 [cond-mat, physics:hep-th, physics:qua...

    2023 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Luo , author F

    author author D. Luo , author F. M. \ Surace , author A. De , author A. Lerose , author E. R. \ Bennewitz , author B. Ware , author A. Schuckert , author Z. Davoudi , author A. V. \ Gorshkov , author O. Katz , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09607 \ (...

    2025 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Coldea , author D

    author author R. Coldea , author D. A. \ Tennant , author E. M. \ Wheeler , author E. Wawrzynska , author D. Prabhakaran , author M. Telling , author K. Habicht , author P. Smeibidl , \ and\ author K. Kiefer ,\ 10.1126/science.1180085 journal journal Science \ volume 327 ,\ pa...

    doi

  20. [28]

    Delfino \ and\ author J

    author author G. Delfino \ and\ author J. Viti ,\ 10.1088/1751-8121/aa5660 journal journal Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical \ volume 50 ,\ pages 084004 ( year 2017 ) ,\ note arXiv:1608.07612 [cond-mat, physics:hep-th] NoStop

    2017 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Fonseca \ and\ author A

    author author P. Fonseca \ and\ author A. Zamolodchikov ,\ 10.48550/arXiv.hep-th/0612304 title Ising Spectroscopy I : Mesons at T T \_c , \ ( year 2006 ),\ note arXiv:hep-th/0612304 NoStop

    2006 doi arXiv

  22. [30]

    Gritsev , author E

    author author V. Gritsev , author E. Demler , author M. Lukin , \ and\ author A. Polkovnikov ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.200404 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 99 ,\ pages 200404 ( year 2007 ) ,\ note publisher: American Physical Society NoStop

    2007 doi

  23. [31]

    Krasznai \ and\ author G

    author author A. Krasznai \ and\ author G. Takács ,\ 10.48550/arXiv.2401.04193 title Schrödinger cats escape confinement \ ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi arXiv

  24. [32]

    author author W. L. \ Tan , author P. Becker , author F. Liu , author G. Pagano , author K. S. \ Collins , author A. De , author L. Feng , author H. B. \ Kaplan , author A. Kyprianidis , author R. Lundgren , author W. Morong , author S. Whitsitt , author A. V. \ Gorshkov , \ a...

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    author author M. J. \ Bhaseen \ and\ author A. M. \ Tsvelik \ ( year 2005 )\ pp.\ pages 661--683 ,\ note arXiv:cond-mat/0409602 NoStop

    2005 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Zou , author Y

    author author H. Zou , author Y. Cui , author X. Wang , author Z. Zhang , author J. Yang , author G. Xu , author A. Okutani , author M. Hagiwara , author M. Matsuda , author G. Wang , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 127 ,\ pages 077201 ( year 2...

    2021

  27. [35]

    author author J. A. \ Kj \"a ll , author F. Pollmann , \ and\ author J. E. \ Moore ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics \ volume 83 ,\ pages 020407 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011

  28. [36]

    Watanabe , author S

    author author Y. Watanabe , author S. Trebst , \ and\ author C. Hickey ,\ 10.48550/arXiv.2401.17266 title Exploring Two -dimensional Coherent Spectroscopy with Exact Diagonalization : Spinons and Confinement in 1D Quantum Magnets , \ ( year 2024 ),\ note arXiv:2401.17266 [cond...

    doi arXiv

  29. [37]

    Amelin , author J

    author author K. Amelin , author J. Viirok , author U. Nagel , author T. Rõõm , author J. Engelmayer , author T. Dey , author A. Agung Nugroho , author T. Lorenz , \ and\ author Z. Wang ,\ 10.1088/1751-8121/aca6b8 journal journal Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoreti...

    doi

  30. [38]

    Sim , author J

    author author G. Sim , author J. Knolle , \ and\ author F. Pollmann ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.L100404 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 107 ,\ pages L100404 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  31. [39]

    Wang , author M

    author author Z. Wang , author M. Schmidt , author A. Bera , author A. Islam , author B. Lake , author A. Loidl , \ and\ author J. Deisenhofer ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 91 ,\ pages 140404 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  32. [40]

    Morris , author R

    author author C. Morris , author R. Vald \'e s Aguilar , author A. Ghosh , author S. Koohpayeh , author J. Krizan , author R. Cava , author O. Tchernyshyov , author T. McQueen , \ and\ author N. Armitage ,\ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 112 ,\ pages 13...

    2014

  33. [41]

    Grenier , author S

    author author B. Grenier , author S. Petit , author V. Simonet , author E. Can \'e vet , author L.-P. \ Regnault , author S. Raymond , author B. Canals , author C. Berthier , \ and\ author P. Lejay ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 114 ,\ pages 017201 (...

    2015

  34. [42]

    Lagnese , author F

    author author G. Lagnese , author F. M. \ Surace , author M. Kormos , \ and\ author P. Calabrese ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 104 ,\ pages L201106 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021

  35. [43]

    Calabrese , author F

    author author P. Calabrese , author F. H. L. \ Essler , \ and\ author M. Fagotti ,\ 10.1088/1742-5468/2012/07/P07016 journal journal Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment \ volume 2012 ,\ pages P07016 ( year 2012 ) ,\ note arXiv:1204.3911 [cond-mat, physics:m...

    2012 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Pfeuty ,\ @noop journal journal ANNALS of Physics \ volume 57 ,\ pages 79 ( year 1970 ) NoStop

    author author P. Pfeuty ,\ @noop journal journal ANNALS of Physics \ volume 57 ,\ pages 79 ( year 1970 ) NoStop

    1970

  37. [45]

    Rutkevich ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 60 ,\ pages 14525 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    author author S. Rutkevich ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 60 ,\ pages 14525 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    1999

  38. [46]

    Pomponio , author M

    author author O. Pomponio , author M. A. \ Werner , author G. Zaránd , \ and\ author G. Takacs ,\ 10.21468/SciPostPhys.12.2.061 journal journal SciPost Physics \ volume 12 ,\ pages 061 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  39. [47]

    author author S. B. \ Rutkevich ,\ 10.1088/1742-5468/2010/07/P07015 journal journal Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment \ volume 2010 ,\ pages P07015 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010 doi

  40. [48]

    author author S. B. \ Rutkevich ,\ 10.1209/0295-5075/121/37001 journal journal EPL (Europhysics Letters) \ volume 121 ,\ pages 37001 ( year 2018 ) ,\ note arXiv:1710.11605 [cond-mat] NoStop

    2018 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Delfino ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevE.97.062138 journal journal Physical Review E \ volume 97 ,\ pages 062138 ( year 2018 ) ,\ note publisher: American Physical Society NoStop

    author author G. Delfino ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevE.97.062138 journal journal Physical Review E \ volume 97 ,\ pages 062138 ( year 2018 ) ,\ note publisher: American Physical Society NoStop

    2018 doi

  42. [50]

    Lagnese , author F

    author author G. Lagnese , author F. M. \ Surace , author M. Kormos , \ and\ author P. Calabrese ,\ 10.1088/1742-5468/abb368 journal journal Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment \ volume 2020 ,\ pages 093106 ( year 2020 ) ,\ note publisher: IOP Publishing an...

    2020 doi

  43. [51]

    author author S. B. \ Rutkevich ,\ 10.1007/s10955-008-9495-1 journal journal Journal of Statistical Physics \ volume 131 ,\ pages 917 ( year 2008 ) ,\ note arXiv:0712.3189 [cond-mat] NoStop

    2008 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Boschini , author M

    author author F. Boschini , author M. Zonno , \ and\ author A. Damascelli ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.96.015003 journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 96 ,\ pages 015003 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  45. [53]

    Vernes \ and\ author P

    author author A. Vernes \ and\ author P. Weinberger ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics \ volume 71 ,\ pages 165108 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005

  46. [54]

    Eskandari-asl \ and\ author A

    author author A. Eskandari-asl \ and\ author A. Avella ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.110.043520 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 110 ,\ pages 043520 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  47. [55]

    author author U. B. \ Hansen , author O. F. \ Syljuåsen , author J. Jensen , author T. K. \ Schäffer , author C. R. \ Andersen , author M. Boehm , author J. A. \ Rodriguez-Rivera , author N. B. \ Christensen , \ and\ author K. Lefmann ,\ 10.1038/s41467-022-29854-9 journal jour...

    doi

  48. [56]

    Song , author Z

    author author P. Song , author Z. Xiang , author Y.-X. \ Zhang , author Z. Wang , author X. Guo , author X. Ruan , author X. Song , author K. Xu , author Y. Y. \ Gao , author H. Fan , \ and\ author D. Zheng ,\ 10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.020302 journal journal PRX Quantum \ volume 5 ...

    doi

  49. [57]

    Verdel , author F

    author author R. Verdel , author F. Liu , author S. Whitsitt , author A. V. \ Gorshkov , \ and\ author M. Heyl ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.014308 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 102 ,\ pages 014308 ( year 2020 ) ,\ note arXiv:1911.11382 [cond-mat, physics:hep-th, physic...

    2020 arXiv

  50. [58]

    \ Guo , author Z.-Y

    author author X.-Y. \ Guo , author Z.-Y. \ Ge , author H. Li , author Z. Wang , author Y.-R. \ Zhang , author P. Song , author Z. Xiang , author X. Song , author Y. Jin , author L. Lu , author K. Xu , author D. Zheng , \ and\ author H. Fan ,\ 10.1038/s41534-021-00385-3 journal...

    doi

  51. [59]

    author author S. P. \ Jordan , author K. S. M. \ Lee , \ and\ author J. Preskill ,\ 10.1126/science.1217069 journal journal Science \ volume 336 ,\ pages 1130 ( year 2012 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.3633 arXiv:1111.3633 [quant-ph] NoStop

    2012 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Gustafson , author Y

    author author E. Gustafson , author Y. Meurice , \ and\ author J. Unmuth-Yockey ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.094503 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 99 ,\ pages 094503 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  53. [61]

    author author R. G. \ Jha , author A. Milsted , author D. Neuenfeld , author J. Preskill , \ and\ author P. Vieira ,\ @noop \ ( year 2024 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.13645 arXiv:2411.13645 [hep-th] NoStop

    2024 arXiv

  54. [62]

    author author R. C. \ Farrell , author N. A. \ Zemlevskiy , author M. Illa , \ and\ author J. Preskill ,\ @noop \ ( year 2025 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.03111 arXiv:2505.03111 [quant-ph] NoStop

    2025

  55. [63]

    author author E. R. \ Bennewitz et al. ,\ @noop \ ( year 2024 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.07061 arXiv:2403.07061 [quant-ph] NoStop

    2024 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Lerose , author F

    author author A. Lerose , author F. M. \ Surace , author P. P. \ Mazza , author G. Perfetto , author M. Collura , \ and\ author A. Gambassi ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.041118 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 102 ,\ pages 041118 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.