Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 33 references

Two-mode and dual-resonant planar photonic waveguides for efficient guiding and trapping of atoms

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A two-mode blue field in a suspended rib waveguide can trap rubidium atoms at depths above 0.3 mK.

desk verdict Genuinely new two-mode design idea with internally consistent numbers, but the headline trap depths rest on an unjustified incoherent-addition assumption for the two blue modes. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.23352 v1 pith:TAEKJ6BH submitted 2025-07-31 physics.atom-ph physics.app-phquant-ph

Yuri B. Ovchinnikov This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-phphysics.app-phquant-ph
keywords two-colourevanescenttrapopticalribwaveguide87RbTE01modedipolepotentialatomchipsuspendedintegratedatomo-photonics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the lateral depth of a two-colour evanescent atom trap on a suspended silica rib waveguide can be increased dramatically by guiding the blue-detuned light in the two lowest transverse modes instead of one. In the 1300/698 nm mono-resonant design, adding the TE01 mode to the blue field raises the minimum lateral trap depth from about 99 µK to 317.6 µK; in the dual-resonant 980/420.2 nm design, tuned to two different rubidium transitions, the same technique gives 313.3 µK. The paper treats the two blue modes as adding in intensity. If the claim holds, planar photonic waveguides become practical platforms for coherent manipulation of ultracold atoms, with applications in quantum sensing, clocks, and neutral-atom quantum computing.

What carries the argument

The central object is the bi-exponential evanescent dipole potential $U_{\mathrm{dip}}(x)=U_r e^{-2x/d_r}+U_b e^{-2x/d_b}$, where the red-detuned component is attractive ($U_r<0$) and the blue-detuned component is repulsive ($U_b>0$), with penetration depths $d_r>d_b$. Laterally, stable trapping requires the red field to dominate near the trap minimum. The paper's lever is to guide the blue light in the two lowest transverse modes, TE00 and TE01; because the TE01 intensity peaks away from the centre, adding it broadens the blue repulsive profile and deepens the lateral well. The efficiency coefficient $\eta=(d_r-d_b)/d_r$ quantifies how much of the red potential is usable at the minimum, and the paper reports values 0.644 and 0.74 for the two designs.

What would settle it

Compute the full three-dimensional optical field with both blue modes, $E=c_0 E_{00}(x,y)e^{i\beta_{00}z}+c_1 E_{01}(x,y)e^{i\beta_{01}z}$, and include the interference cross term $2\,\mathrm{Re}[c_0 c_1^* E_{00}E_{01}^*]\cos((\beta_{00}-\beta_{01})z)$. If the resulting longitudinal corrugation, with period $2\pi/(\beta_{00}-\beta_{01})\approx 50\,\mu\mathrm{m}$ at 698 nm, lowers the minimum trap depth below the quoted values, then the reported depths are z-averaged rather than the field an atom experiences. A measurement of atom survival versus position along the guide would settle which description is correct.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a two-mode suspended optical rib waveguide, in which the higher-frequency blue-detuned component propagates in the TE00 and TE01 transverse modes while the lower-frequency red-detuned component propagates in a single TE00 mode, produces a two-colour evanescent dipole trap for 87Rb with a lateral depth of about 0.3 mK or more. The mechanism is that the TE01 blue mode has intensity maxima away from the waveguide centre, so the combined blue repulsive profile is broader and lets the red attractive mode dominate at the trap minimum. For $\lambda_r = 1300$ nm and $\lambda_b = 698$ nm the paper computes a minimum lateral trap depth of 317.6 µK at milliwatt-level powers, with spontaneous scattering rates of a few s−1 and a heating rate near 0.8 µK/s. For the dual-resonant design, with $\lambda_r = 980$ nm and $\lambda_b = 420.2$ nm, it computes 313.3 µK, with a scattering rate of 298 s−1 and an estimated trapping time of about 2 s. The two designs are characterized by efficiency coefficients of 0.644 and 0.74, respectively.

Load-bearing premise

The quoted trap depths assume the two blue-detuned guided modes add as intensities; if they instead interfere coherently, the potential along the waveguide is corrugated and the depth an atom actually experiences may be lower.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For the 1300/698 nm waveguide, the minimum lateral trap depth rises from 99 µK without the TE01 mode to 317.6 µK with it, at similar milliwatt-level powers and with negligible heating of roughly 0.8 µK/s.
  • The dual-resonant 980/420.2 nm design reaches 313.3 µK, and its shorter blue wavelength is useful for building optical lattices and Bragg splitting at waveguide intersections.
  • The dual-resonant configuration can be switched to single-mode operation by replacing the 420 nm double mode with a single 640 nm mode, which may improve stability at waveguide crossings for atom interferometers.
  • The approach is not specific to rubidium; the paper states it applies to many other types of atoms as well.
  • The gain from the TE01 mode saturates at high relative intensities, so a modest TE01 power provides most of the lateral depth increase.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If coherent beating between the two blue modes is not suppressed, the trap potential is corrugated along the waveguide axis with a period on the order of 50 µm at 698 nm, so the quoted depths describe an intensity-averaged field rather than the field an atom moving along the guide would see.
  • The two-mode broadening recipe could be transferred to other alkali species and other waveguide cross-sections, and possibly applied with the roles of red and blue light reversed to shape the attractive rather than the repulsive potential.
  • The dual-resonant design's scattering rate of 298 s−1 at 420.2 nm makes it most suitable for short interrogation cycles, while the far-detuned 1300/698 nm design is better suited to long-coherence storage; a hybrid sequence could exploit both.
  • A direct experimental test would load atoms from an optical tweezer into the waveguide trap and measure the lifetime and heating rate; matching the predicted 2 s at 420.2 nm would validate the scattering calculation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper models two-colour evanescent dipole traps for 87Rb above suspended silica rib waveguides. Its central proposal is to guide the blue-detuned frequency component in the two lowest transverse modes (TE00 and TE01) while the red-detuned component propagates in a single TE00 mode, thereby broadening the lateral intensity profile of the blue field. Applying this to a 1300/698 nm mono-resonant design and to a 980/420.2 nm dual-resonant design, the paper reports minimum lateral trap depths of 317.6 µK and 313.3 µK, respectively, and states that total depths of 0.3 mK are reachable under reasonable conditions. The analytic framework of Section 2 is internally consistent, and the quoted η, S, and penetration-depth values are mutually consistent with the reported mode simulations.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the two-mode strategy would directly address the well-known lateral-anisotropy problem of planar waveguide evanescent traps, a problem that has so far prevented experimental realization. The paper is a forward calculation with no fitted parameters: the trap depths follow from specified geometries, mode powers, and literature atomic matrix elements, and the paper explicitly checks η and S against the penetration depths. It also provides scattering rates and heating estimates for the proposed configurations, which is valuable for experimental planning. However, the headline depth values rest on an unphysical incoherent superposition of the two blue modes, so the quantitative conclusions are not yet established.

major comments (1)
  1. [Sec. 5, Fig. 4; Sec. 6, Fig. 9] The statement in Section 7 that mode-selective coupling can be achieved with directional couplers does not resolve the coherence issue. Directional couplers set the amplitudes of the TE00 and TE01 modes, but the relative phase at the trapping region depends on the coupler design and the propagation length to that region. Unless the two modes are driven at distinctly different frequencies, the interference term remains and the trap depth is z-dependent. The manuscript should either provide a specific phase-controlled excitation scheme or explicitly demonstrate that the resulting interference pattern does not reduce the lateral barrier below the quoted values.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 6 caption] The caption for Fig. 6 incorrectly states the wavelengths as λr = 782 nm and λb = 778 nm; this appears to be a copy-paste from the Fig. 2 caption. The figure shows the 1300/698 nm two-mode case and the caption should state those wavelengths.
  2. [Sec. 6, text near Eq. (6)] The sentence 'The frequency of the "red" component is chosen to be far below the 5S−5P transition at λb = 980nm' uses the subscript b for the 980 nm mode; this should be λr = 980 nm.
  3. [Sec. 5, first paragraph] The numerical simulations of the waveguide modes are attributed to reference [21] in Section 5, whereas Sections 4 and 6 attribute the same kind of simulation to reference [22]. The reference number in Section 5 appears to be a typographical error and should be corrected to [22].
  4. [Fig. 4 and Sec. 5, paragraph before Fig. 6] Fig. 4 is described as showing the sum of the TE00 and TE01 intensities 'with the same amplitudes', while the actual trap calculation in Fig. 6 uses powers of 7.73 mW and 8.65 mW for the two modes. Please clarify whether the dotted curve is only illustrative or whether it corresponds to the exact power ratio used in the trap-depth calculation.
  5. [Eq. (10)] The van der Waals term is written as '-C3λef f/2π / x3(x + λef f/2π)', which is hard to parse. Please write the expression with explicit brackets, e.g., -C3 (λeff/2π) / [x^3 (x + λeff/2π)], to avoid ambiguity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the trap depths are forward calculations from stated powers, waveguide geometry, and externally tabulated rubidium matrix elements; self-citations are background formulas, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central results of Sections 5 and 6 are obtained by direct numerical simulation: the waveguide mode fields are computed with an external mode solver [22], the dipole potentials are evaluated from the ac polarizability formula (6) with matrix elements taken from independent published sources [19,20], and the total potential is assembled using Eq. (10). The reported lateral depths of 317.6 uK and 313.3 uK are outputs of this calculation, not parameters fitted to reproduce those depths. The efficiency coefficient eta in Eq. (5) is an algebraic consequence of the bi-exponential ansatz (1)-(4), not an input. The author's own prior work is cited for standard background such as the two-colour evanescent trap concept [5], optical dipole trap theory [17], and atom-chip waveguide context [1,2,33], but none of these citations is used to forbid alternatives or to justify the novel quantitative claim that adding a TE01 mode increases lateral depth; that claim is verified by the simulation shown in Figures 4-7 and 9. The only notable modeling assumption is that the TE00 and TE01 blue fields are added incoherently (dotted curve in Fig. 4), which neglects the z-dependent interference term 2 Re[c0 c1* E00 E01] cos(Delta beta z). This is a physics/correctness limitation, not circularity: the calculation does not assume the resulting depth; it computes a z-averaged potential from a stated model. The paper is not benchmarked against a measured trap depth, so its predictions remain untested theoretically, but the derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No physical entity is invented. The paper's central numbers are controlled by chosen geometry, chosen powers, external mode-solver output, and standard atom-light formulas.

free parameters (3)
  • waveguide geometry (h, hr, w) = h=150nm, hr=30nm, w=2.5um (Sec.5); h=150nm, hr=15nm, w=1.5um (Sec.6)
    Chosen by hand to realize the desired single-mode and two-mode regimes; all trap depths scale with these dimensions.
  • mode optical powers = e.g. 7.03mW (1300nm TE00), 7.73mW (698nm TE00), 8.65mW (698nm TE01); 6.3mW, 4.66mW, 5.78mW for Sec.6
    Selected by the author to define 'reasonable conditions'; depths are proportional to these inputs rather than predicted from constraints.
  • wavelength and frequency detunings = lambda_r=1300nm, lambda_b=698nm (Sec.5); lambda_b=420.2nm, lambda_r=980nm (Sec.6)
    Chosen to satisfy the large-frequency-difference and two-mode conditions; the 0.1nm detuning in Sec.6 drives the high scattering rate.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Scalar ac polarizability (Eq. 6) with reduced matrix elements from Table 1 gives the optical dipole potential.
    All trap depths are proportional to this polarizability. Matrix elements are taken from refs [17,19,20], not re-measured.
  • domain assumption The external WMSS mode solver [22] accurately models the supported modes and evanescent decay lengths of the suspended silica rib waveguides.
    No mode-solver files, version, or convergence checks are provided; the numerical penetration depths drive Eqs. (2)-(5).
  • domain assumption The total potential is a sum of two exponential evanescent potentials plus a regularized van der Waals or Casimir-Polder term (Eq. 10).
    Standard for planar evanescent traps [1], but ignores possible non-exponential near-field corrections and mode-shape evolution away from the surface.
  • domain assumption Spontaneous scattering is described by Eq. (8) with the condition Gamma much less than Omega much less than detuning.
    The paper states this condition, but at the 420.2nm design the detuning is only 0.1nm, near the edge of validity; branching to other decay channels is acknowledged but not included in detail.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Two-mode and dual-resonant planar photonic waveguides for efficient guiding and trapping of atoms." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TAEKJ6BH

@misc{pith2026250723352,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Two-mode and dual-resonant planar photonic waveguides for efficient guiding and trapping of atoms},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TAEKJ6BH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.23352}
}
read the original abstract

The trapping of ultracold atoms using two-colour evanescent light waves formed by propagating modes of suspended optical rib waveguides is modelled in different configurations. Reducing the anisotropy of the two-colour evanescent optical dipole potential requires two laser light components with a large frequency difference. The upper frequency is guided in the two lowest transverse waveguide modes and the lower frequency propagates in a single-mode regime. This increases the dipole potential depth in the lateral direction. An additional increase in the optical dipole potential can be achieved by tuning the frequencies of the two modes to two different atomic transitions. When applied to rubidium, the total depth of the corresponding surface optical dipole traps can reach 0.3 mK or above under reasonable conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.23352 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Geometry of a suspended optical rib waveguide. The valence part of the scalar ac polarizability for the ground state 5 2S1/2 of 87Rb atoms driven by light of frequency ω is given by the formula [18]: αv (ω) = 1 3ℏ X 8 n=5   ωnp1/2 ⟨5s ∥D∥ np1/2⟩ 2 ω2 np1/2 − ω2 + ωnp3/2 ⟨5s ∥D∥ np3/2⟩ 2 ω2 np3/2 − ω2   , (6) where ωnpj ′ are frequencies of the 5 2S1/2 − n 2Pj ′ atomic transitions, j ′ = 1/2, 3/2, n = 5, 6, 7...,… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Cross section of the total potential for two TE00 modes at λr = 782 nm and λb = 778 nm of a suspended optical rib waveguide at maximum surface light intensities Ir(0, 0) = 6.6 × 109 W/m2 and Ib(0, 0) = 7.5 × 109 W/m2 . evanescent waves of these modes in a vacuum are dr = 151.37 nm and db = 150.30 nm, respectively. The total potential, calculated from equations (6,7,10), for optical powers in the two modes of Pr = 7.… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Numerically simulated spatial distributions of light intensities in guiding modes of the suspended optical rib waveguide in xy-plane: a) TE00 mode at 698 nm; b) TE01 mode at 698 nm; c) TE00 mode at 1300 nm. Single-mode propagation can be achieved for 1300 nm light, whereas 698 nm light propagates in a two-mode regime. Numerical simulations [21] show that a suspended silica rib waveguide with h = 150 nm, hr = 30 nm a… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Normalized intensity distributions of light in the modes of the suspended optical rib waveguide along y-axis. Solid red curve is the TE00 mode at 1300 nm, solid blue curve is the TE00 mode at 698 nm, dashed blue curve is the TE01 mode at 698 nm and dotted curve is a su…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Cross section of the total potential for two TE00 modes at λr = 1300 nm and λb = 698 nm of a suspended optical rib waveguide at maximum surface light intensities Ir(0, 0) = 1.5 × 1010 W/m2 and Ib(0, 0) = 1.2 × 1010 W/m2 . The total potential of the trap (3) is simulate…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Cross section of the total potential for two TE00 modes at λr = 782 nm and λb = 778 nm of a suspended optical rib waveguide at maximum surface light intensities Ir(0, 0) = 6.6 × 109 W/m2 and Ib(0, 0) = 7.5 × 109 W/m2 . The dashed blue curve in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Minimum depth of the total potential for a trap formed by λr = 1300 nm and λb = 698 nm modes of a two-mode suspended optical rib waveguide as a function of relative intensity of the 698 nm TE01 mode. It can be concluded that this trap configuration is efficient in term…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The frequency of the "blue" optical field component of the two-colour evanescent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Energy levels of four lowest 5s − npj ′ transitions of 87Rb and frequencies of the two modes of the waveguide. light includes two modes: TE00 with nef f = 1.2870 and β = 19.2487 µm−1 and TE01 mode with nef f = 1.2768 and β = 19.0963 µm−1 . The corresponding penetration…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Cross section of total potential for one TE00 mode of a suspended optical rib waveguide at λr = 980 nm and two modes TE00 and TE01 at λb = 420.2 nm. The total potential of the trap for powers of modes PTE00(980nm) = 6.3 mW, PTE00(420.2nm) = 4.66 mW and PTE01(420.2nm) =…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [13]

    Two-colour atom guide and 1D optical lattice using evanescent fields of high-order transverse modes

    J. Fu, X. Yin, and L. Tong, “Two-colour atom guide and 1D optical lattice using evanescent fields of high-order transverse modes” J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys.40 4195 (2007)

    work page 2007

  2. [1]

    Towards all-optical atom chips based on optical waveguides,

    Y. B. Ovchinnikov, and F. E. Ayi-Yovo, “Towards all-optical atom chips based on optical waveguides,” New J. Phys.22 053003 (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [2]

    A perspective on integrated atomo-photonic waveguide circuits,

    Y. B. Ovchinnikov, “A perspective on integrated atomo-photonic waveguide circuits,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 120 010502 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [3]

    Essay: Quantum Sensing with Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Platforms for Fundamental Physics,

    J. Ye, P. Zoller, “Essay: Quantum Sensing with Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Platforms for Fundamental Physics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132 190001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [4]

    Quantum computing with neutral atoms,

    L. Henriet, L. Beguin, A. Signoles A, et al. “Quantum computing with neutral atoms,” Quantum 4 327 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [5]

    An atomic trap based on evanescent light waves,

    Y. B. Ovchinnikov, S. V. Shul’ga, and V. I. Balykin “An atomic trap based on evanescent light waves,” J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.24, 3173-3178 (1991)

    work page 1991

  7. [6]

    Two-Dimensional Bose-Einstein Condensate in an Optical Surface Trap,

    M. Hammes, D. Rychtarik, B. Engeser,et al., “Two-Dimensional Bose-Einstein Condensate in an Optical Surface Trap,” Phys. Rev. Lett.90 173001 (2003)

    work page 2003

  8. [7]

    Optical Nanofibers: a new platform for quantum optics,

    P. Solano, J. A. Grover, J. E. Hoffman,et al., “Optical Nanofibers: a new platform for quantum optics,” Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys.66, 439-505 (2017). Two-mode and dual-resonant planar photonic waveguides for efficient guiding and trapping of atoms14

    work page 2017

Show all 33 references
  1. [8]

    Optical nanofibres and neutral atoms,

    T. Nieddu, V. Gokhoroo, and S. N. Chormaic, “Optical nanofibres and neutral atoms,” Journal of Optics 18 053001 (2016)

    2016

  2. [9]

    Optical Interface Created by Laser-Cooled Atoms Trapped in the Evanescent Field Surrounding an Optical Nanofiber,

    E. Vetsch, D. Reitz, G. Sague´, et al. , “Optical Interface Created by Laser-Cooled Atoms Trapped in the Evanescent Field Surrounding an Optical Nanofiber,” Phys. Rev. Let.104 203603 (2010)

    2010

  3. [10]

    Characterization of suspended membrane waveguides towards a photonic atom trap integrated platform,

    M. Gehl, W. Kindel, N. Karl N,et al., “Characterization of suspended membrane waveguides towards a photonic atom trap integrated platform,” Optics Express textbf29 13129-13140 (2021)

    2021

  4. [11]

    Substrate-based atom waveguide using guided two-color evanescent light fields,

    A. H. Barnett, S. P. Smith, M. Olshanii,et al., “Substrate-based atom waveguide using guided two-color evanescent light fields,” Phys. Rev. A61, 023608 (2000)

    2000

  5. [12]

    Designingneutral-atomnanotrapswithintegrated optical waveguides

    J.P.Burke, S.-T.Chu, G.W.Bryant, et al., “Designingneutral-atomnanotrapswithintegrated optical waveguides” Phys. Rev. A65, 043411 (2002)

    2002

  6. [14]

    Integrated optical dipole trap for cold neutral atoms with an optical waveguide coupler,

    J. Lee, D. H. Park, S. Mittal,et al., “Integrated optical dipole trap for cold neutral atoms with an optical waveguide coupler,” New Journal of Physics15, 043010 (2013)

    2013

  7. [15]

    A nanowaveguide platform for collective atom-light interaction,

    Y. Meng, J. Lee, M. Dagenais, et al. , “A nanowaveguide platform for collective atom-light interaction,” Appl. Phys. Lett.107, 091110 (2015)

    2015

  8. [16]

    Trapped atoms and superradiance on an integrated nanophotonic microring circuit,

    X. Zhou, H. Tamura, T.-H. Chang T-H, et al. , “Trapped atoms and superradiance on an integrated nanophotonic microring circuit,” Phys. Rev. X14 031004 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Optical dipole traps for neutral atoms,

    R. Grimm, M. Weidemüller, Y. B. Ovchinnikov, “Optical dipole traps for neutral atoms,” Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys.42 95-170 (2000)

    2000

  10. [18]

    Relativistic many-body calculations of electric- dipole matrix elements, lifetimes, and polarizabilities in rubidium,

    M. S. Safronova, C. J. Williams, C. W. Clark, “Relativistic many-body calculations of electric- dipole matrix elements, lifetimes, and polarizabilities in rubidium,” Phys. Rev. A69 022509 (2004)

    2004

  11. [19]

    Critically evaluated theoretical energies, lifetimes, hyperfine constants, and multipole polarizabilities in 87Rb,

    M. S. Safronova, U. I. Safronova, “Critically evaluated theoretical energies, lifetimes, hyperfine constants, and multipole polarizabilities in 87Rb,” Phys. Rev. A83 052508 (2011)

    2011

  12. [20]

    Precision measurement of transition matrix elements via light shift cancellation,

    C. D. Herold, X. L. Vaidya, S. L. Rolston,et al., “Precision measurement of transition matrix elements via light shift cancellation,” Phys. Rev. Let.109 243003 (2012)

    2012

  13. [21]

    Coupling a single trapped atom to a nanoscale optical cavity,

    J. D. Thomson, T. G. Tiecke, N. P. de Leon,et al., “Coupling a single trapped atom to a nanoscale optical cavity,” Science, (supplementary material)340, 1202 (2013)

    2013

  14. [22]

    Wave-matching mode solver for rectangular dielectric optical waveguides,

    M. Hammer, “Wave-matching mode solver for rectangular dielectric optical waveguides,” https://www.computational-photonics.eu/wmms.html (2025)

    2025

  15. [23]

    Narrow-line cooling of87Rb using 5S1/2→ 6P1/2 open transition at 420 nm,

    R. C. Das, D. Shylla, A. Beraet al., “Narrow-line cooling of87Rb using 5S1/2→ 6P1/2 open transition at 420 nm,” J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.56 025301 (2023)

    2023

  16. [24]

    An optical lattice clock,

    M. Takamoto, F.-L. Hong, R. Higashi,et al., “An optical lattice clock,” Nature435 321 (2005)

    2005

  17. [25]

    Clock with8× 10−19 systematic uncertainty,

    A. Aeppli, K. Kim, W. Warfield,et al., “Clock with8× 10−19 systematic uncertainty,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 023401 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Prospects for optical clocks with a blue-detuned lattice,

    M. Takamoto, H. Katori, S. I. Marimo,et al., “Prospects for optical clocks with a blue-detuned lattice,” Phys. Rev. Lett.102 063002 (2009)

    2009

  19. [27]

    Spectroscopy of the1S0−3P0 Clock transition of87Sr in an optical lattice,

    M. Takamoto, H. Katori, “Spectroscopy of the1S0−3P0 Clock transition of87Sr in an optical lattice,” Phys. Rev. Lett.91 223001 (2003)

    2003

  20. [28]

    Distributed quasi-Bragg beam splitter in crossed atomic waveguides,

    V. Guarrera, R. Moore, A. Bunting,et al., “Distributed quasi-Bragg beam splitter in crossed atomic waveguides,” Sci. Reports7 4749 (2017)

    2017

  21. [29]

    Multimode waveguide based directional coupler,

    R. Ahmed, A. A. Rifat, A. Sabouri,et al., “Multimode waveguide based directional coupler,” Opt. Comm. 370 183 (2016)

    2016

  22. [30]

    Trapping single atoms on a nanophotonic circuit with configurable tweezer lattices,

    M. E. Kim, T.-H. Chang, B. M. Fields,et al., “Trapping single atoms on a nanophotonic circuit with configurable tweezer lattices,” Nature Comm.10 1647 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    Trapped Atoms and Superradiance on an Integrated Nanophotonic Microring Circuit,

    X. Zhou, H. Tamura, T.-H. Chang,et al., “Trapped Atoms and Superradiance on an Integrated Nanophotonic Microring Circuit,” Phys. Rev. X14 031004 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Roadmap on Atomtronics: State of the art and Two-mode and dual-resonant planar photonic waveguides for efficient guiding and trapping of atoms15 perspective,

    L. Amico, M. Bosher, G. Birkl, et al. , “Roadmap on Atomtronics: State of the art and Two-mode and dual-resonant planar photonic waveguides for efficient guiding and trapping of atoms15 perspective,” AVS Quantum Sci.3 039201 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    Optical dipole micro-trap for atoms based on crossed planar photonic waveguides,

    Y. B. Ovchinnikov, F. E. Ayi-Yovo and A. Spampinato, “Optical dipole micro-trap for atoms based on crossed planar photonic waveguides,” J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.56 235002 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.