Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 37 references

Features of Charged Lepton Flavor Violation in an $A_4$ Symmetric Neutrino Mass Model

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that in a neutrino mass model with A4 symmetry, the symmetry forces the amplitudes for radiative lepton-flavour-violating decays such as μ→eγ to vanish, while meson decays such as KL→μ+e− proceed at tree level with…

desk verdict The paper's headline radiative-vanishing claim is undone by its own coupling table; the semileptonic CLFV catalog is new and worth saving, but the paper needs a real correction, not copyedit. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.23747 v1 pith:CQNGM6H5 submitted 2025-07-31 hep-ph

Pravesh Chndra Awasthi , Jai More , Akhila Kumar Pradhan , Kumar Rao , Purushottam Sahu , S. Uma Sankar This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords chargedleptonflavourviolationA4symmetrytri-bimaximalmixingneutrinomassmodelflavour-changingneutralcurrentsmesondecaysradiativeheavyscalars
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Neutrino oscillations imply that charged leptons must also change flavour, but different neutrino mass models disagree about which decays should appear first. This paper analyzes a model with an A4 discrete flavour symmetry that produces tri-bimaximal (a specific simple pattern of) neutrino mixing, and claims that the symmetry cleanly separates the two main classes of flavour-violating decays: radiative decays such as $\mu\to e\gamma$ get zero amplitude at this order, while meson decays such as $K_L\to\mu^+e^-$ proceed at tree level with branching ratios large enough for near-future experiments. If correct, this would overturn the standard seesaw expectation that radiative rates always dominate meson rates in charged lepton flavour violation. The paper works out the full scalar potential, derives the neutral scalar mass eigenstates, and lists a concrete set of predicted upper bounds, several within a factor of a few of present limits.

What carries the argument

The object that carries the argument is the A4 group structure of the model and the table of flavour-changing neutral-scalar couplings it produces. A4, the group of even permutations of four objects, is used to organise three generations of quarks and leptons together with three scalar doublets and three scalar singlets; the assumed vacuum values leave all three doublets with a common value $v$ and only one singlet nonzero. Diagonalising the full neutral-scalar mass matrix yields four mass eigenstates, of which $\Phi_2^0$ and $\Phi_3^0$ carry purely flavour-violating Yukawa couplings. The A4 phase factors $\omega$ (a cube root of unity) arrange these couplings so that half of them are zero, and whenever a coupling to $\Phi_2^0$ is nonzero the corresponding coupling to $\Phi_3^0$ is zero, and vice versa. This complementary half-zero pattern is what makes radiative amplitude products vanish while meson amplitude products survive.

What would settle it

Look for $\mu\to e\gamma$ and $K_L\to\mu^+e^-$ with comparable sensitivity: the model requires the radiative mode to stay invisible while $K_L\to\mu^+e^-$ sits just below $4.7\times10^{-12}$. A confirmed $\mu\to e\gamma$ signal, or a measured $K_L\to\mu^+e^-$ rate above the model's computed upper bound of $4.0\times10^{-12}$ for scalar masses $\ge 900$ GeV, would refute the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the A4 symmetry, together with the assumed vacuum alignment, determines a complementary pattern of flavour-changing neutral-scalar couplings: each pair of charged leptons couples to exactly one of the two flavour-violating scalars $\Phi_2^0$ or $\Phi_3^0$, never to both. That pattern kills every radiative-loop product, for instance $(g_\ell^{e\tau})(g_\ell^{\mu\tau})^*$ vanishes, while leaving non-zero products such as $h_{3d}h_{1\ell}$ for tree-level meson decays. As a result, the branching ratios of meson CLFV decays are not correlated with radiative ones as they are in seesaw models. The paper also finds that neutral meson mixing vanishes at tree level and that the symmetry imposes a charge selection rule: if $M^0\to \ell_m^+\ell_n^-$ is allowed, then $M^0\to \ell_m^-\ell_n^+$ is forbidden. The most striking numerical consequence is $K_L\to\mu^+e^-$ with an upper bound of $4.0\times10^{-12}$, just below the current experimental bound of $4.7\times10^{-12}$.

Load-bearing premise

The predictions stand on the assumed vacuum alignment, with all three A4 doublet scalars sharing a common value $v$, one singlet scalar taking value $w$ and the others zero, and with the additional simplifying choice $v_0=v$; if the true minimum of the scalar potential differs, or if $v_0\neq v$, the Yukawa normalization and every quoted branching ratio change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the model is right, $K_L\to\mu^+e^-$ should appear near the present experimental limit, and a dedicated search with sensitivity just below $10^{-12}$ can settle it.
  • The decays $B_s^0\to\mu^+e^-$ and $B^+\to K^+\mu^+e^-$ are predicted with upper bounds around $10^{-11}$, within reach of the next generation of rare-decay experiments.
  • Radiative decays $\mu\to e\gamma$, $\tau\to e\gamma$, and $\tau\to\mu\gamma$ should remain unseen, because their scalar-mediated amplitudes vanish at this order.
  • Tree-level neutral meson mixing is absent, so the scalar masses are constrained by direct collider searches for heavy scalars rather than by $K^0$-$\bar K^0$ or $B^0$-$\bar B^0$ mixing.
  • The charge selection rule means experiments should look for $M^0\to\ell_m^+\ell_n^-$ and not expect the charge-conjugated mode; the three-lepton tau decays $\tau^-\to\mu^-\mu^-e^+$ and $\tau^-\to e^-e^-\mu^+$ are predicted at the $10^{-14}$ level.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If a near-future experiment sees $K_L\to\mu^+e^-$ but not $\mu\to e\gamma$, that pattern would be natural here but hard to accommodate in standard seesaw models; it would point toward discrete-symmetry neutrino mass models as a class.
  • The quoted branching ratios scale with the assumed scalar masses and with the choice $v_0=v$; if the electroweak constraint $v_0^2+3v^2=v_{EW}^2$ is imposed with $v_0\neq v$, the Yukawa normalization shifts and the predicted upper bounds move by order-one factors, so the exact proximity of $K_L\to\mu^+e^-$ to the present limit should not be read too precisely.
  • The model's most distinctive signature is the anti-correlation between radiative and meson CLFV; a future simultaneous limit from both classes can be used to test this decoupling without observing any single decay.
  • The same A4 mechanism might be transplanted to other non-Abelian discrete groups, where different phase factors would produce different charge selection rules and different hierarchies among meson modes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies charged lepton flavour violation (CLFV) in an A4-symmetric neutrino mass model originally proposed in ref. [6], where the vacuum alignment is chosen to produce tribimaximal neutrino mixing. After diagonalizing the full neutral scalar potential, the authors identify two flavour-diagonal and two flavour-violating neutral scalars, list all tree-level flavour-changing neutral couplings in Table 2, and compute meson CLFV branching ratios (both purely leptonic and semileptonic) using LHC lower bounds on the scalar masses and external form factors. The central advertised result is that, in contrast to standard seesaw models, meson CLFV decays can be within reach of near-future experiments while radiative CLFV decays are negligibly small, allegedly because A4 forbids the radiative amplitudes. The paper also derives a charge-selection rule for M0 -> l_m+ l_n- decays.

Significance. If correct, the claimed decoupling between meson and radiative CLFV rates would be a striking counterexample to the seesaw expectation that meson CLFV branching ratios are always smaller than radiative ones, and it would motivate dedicated searches such as KL -> mu e. The paper has useful ingredients: a complete neutral-scalar mass eigenbasis, an explicit table of all FCNC couplings, a broad survey of current experimental limits, and a correct demonstration that neutral meson mixing vanishes at tree level in this model. However, the central radiative-decay claim is based on an incorrect identification of the one-loop amplitude, so the advertised A4-forbidding mechanism is not established. The correct amplitude is nonzero and requires a full one-loop evaluation; until that is supplied, the paper's headline phenomenological conclusion is unsupported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.4, Eq. (4.3), Table 2] The amplitude for mu -> e gamma is misidentified. From the mass-basis Lagrangian in Eq. (A.2), the one-loop dipole with an internal tau line uses the Phi3 couplings \bar mu_L tau_R and \bar e_R tau_L, giving a product (~g_{mu tau})(~g_{tau e})* = (h3_l omega)(h1_l omega)* = h3_l h1_l* != 0; Table 2 lists both ~g_{mu tau}=h3_l omega and ~g_{tau e}=h1_l omega as nonzero. The paper instead evaluates (g_{e tau})(g_{mu tau})* with g_{mu tau}=0 from the Phi2 column, so the conclusion that the amplitude vanishes is invalid. The same index-order error affects tau -> mu gamma and tau -> e gamma. A corrected one-loop calculation is required before the claim that A4 makes radiative CLFV amplitudes vanish, or that they are negligibly small, can be assessed.
  2. [Section 2.2, Eq. (2.2)] The text states that v0^2 + 3v^2 = v_EW^2 and then says 'we assume v0 = v, which implies v = v_EW.' With v0 = v, the constraint gives 4v^2 = v_EW^2, so v = v_EW/2, not v = v_EW. Since the Yukawa couplings are normalized as h_i = m_i/(sqrt(3) v), this changes the normalization of all lepton and quark Yukawas and therefore changes the numerical branching ratios in Tables 4-6. Please state which normalization was actually used and recompute the quoted bounds.
  3. [Tables 4-6] The predicted branching ratios are presented without any of the defining formulas, such as the relation between BR(KL -> mu e), the relevant Yukawa products, scalar masses, meson decay constants, and form factors. Without at least one representative amplitude and phase-space expression, the numerical results cannot be reproduced or checked. This is not merely a presentation issue, because the claimed proximity of KL -> mu+e- to the current experimental bound is a central part of the paper's message.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.4] The sentence 'From table 3, we see that the product of the coefficients in the above amplitude vanishes' refers to the lepton FCNC couplings, which are in Table 2, not Table 3.
  2. [Section 2, Table 2] The notation g_{ij} and ~g_{ij} is not defined explicitly. State that g_{ij} (~g_{ij}) is the coefficient of \bar i_L j_R Phi2 (Phi3); an explicit definition would have made the index-order mistake in Eq. (4.3) easier to catch.
  3. [Throughout] There are several typographical and grammatical errors: 'T able 2' in the Table 2 caption, 'F rom' and 'is are always zero' near Eq. (4.1), and 'three-level amplitudes' in Section 4.2 should be 'tree-level amplitudes.'
  4. [Section 3, Eq. (3.12)] The last row of the unitary matrix in Eq. (3.12) contains a stray comma and the row entries are not aligned with the other rows; please reformat the matrix.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the meson CLFV predictions are governed by fixed Yukawa couplings and external inputs, while the radiative-vanishing claim is an internal algebraic error rather than a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's CLFV branching ratios are computed from the model's Yukawa couplings, which are fixed by charged-fermion masses via eq. (2.6), from the collider bound m_{Phi2}, m_{Phi3} >= 900 GeV quoted from ref. [13], and from external form factors [19,20]. No CLFV branching ratio or related observable is used as an input, and no parameter is fitted to the target decays. The A4 structure enters through the FCNI coupling table, but that table is derived from the explicit Lagrangian (A.2)-(A.6) and is not equivalent to the predicted CLFV rates. The self-citation to ref. [7] in the introduction and conclusion is contextual; the paper does not use ref. [7] as the proof of the vanishing radiative amplitudes, it attempts its own derivation in Sec. 4.4. That derivation is incorrect, because the one-loop dipole requires the product (g_{e tau})(g_{tau mu})*, and the zero entry in table 2 is g_{mu tau}, not g_{tau mu}; reading eq. (A.2), g_{tau mu} = h_{2 ell} omega^2 is nonzero. However, an internal algebraic mistake is not circularity. The assumption v0 = v is an unconstrained model choice, not a fit to CLFV data. No circular step is exhibited, so the circularity score is low; the only minor blemish is a non-load-bearing self-citation, motivating 1 rather than 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central rates rest on the assumed vacuum alignment of the A4 model, the electroweak scale normalization, and the LHC mass bound. The paper introduces no new particles. No free parameters are fitted to CLFV data.

free parameters (2)
  • v0/v ratio = 1 (assumed)
    To reduce undetermined parameters, Sec 2.2 sets v0=v, but this conflicts with the stated constraint v0^2+3v^2=v_EW^2, which would require v=v_EW/2. This normalization enters all Yukawa couplings and branching ratios.
  • m_Phi2, m_Phi3 = 900 GeV (lower bound)
    Branching ratios scale as 1/m^4; the paper uses the LHC lower bound as the mass to quote maximum allowed rates. Higher masses would reduce all predictions.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption A4 field content and VEV alignment of ref [6] with TBM mixing
    The entire FCNC texture and selection rules come from this assumed vacuum, taken from the 2006 model paper without re-deriving stability in the present work.
  • domain assumption Type-I seesaw with M around 1 TeV and m_D around 0.1 MeV
    Used to fix light-heavy neutrino mixing as negligibly small; it does not affect the tree-level scalar FCNC rates.
  • domain assumption LHC lower bounds on heavy scalar masses
    m_Phi2 and m_Phi3 greater than or equal to 900 GeV from refs [12,13] are used to set the maximum allowed branching ratios.
  • ad hoc to paper rho3 real and simplified scalar potential
    Sec 3 assumes rho3 real 'to simplify the algebra'; the mass eigenbasis for the FCNC scalars is independent of this choice, so this assumption is harmless.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Features of Charged Lepton Flavor Violation in an $A_4$ Symmetric Neutrino Mass Model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CQNGM6H5

@misc{pith2026250723747,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Features of Charged Lepton Flavor Violation in an $A_4$ Symmetric Neutrino Mass Model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CQNGM6H5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.23747}
}
abstract

Neutrino flavour oscillations imply that there must be charged lepton flavour violation (CLFV) also. Different neutrino mass models predict different patterns of CLFV decays. Neutrino mass generation through standard see-saw mechanisms leads to the prediction that the branching ratios of meson CLFV decays will always be smaller than the corresponding radiative CLFV decays. In this work, we analyse an interesting neutrino mass model, based on $A_4$ symmetry, in which the symmetry and the symmetry-breaking pattern lead the neutrino mixing matrix to be of tri-bimaximal (TBM) form. In this model, we find that the meson CLFV decay amplitudes are not correlated to the corresponding radiative CLFV amplitudes, unlike in the case of see-saw models. The branching ratios of radiative CLFV decays are predicted to be negligibly small in this model, but those of the meson CLFV decays can be large enough to be observable in the near future.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

  1. [6]

    A(4) flavor symmetry breaking scheme for understanding quark and neutrino mixing angles ,

    X.-G. He, Y.-Y. Keum, and R. R. Volkas, “ A(4) flavor symmetry breaking scheme for understanding quark and neutrino mixing angles ,” JHEP 04 (2006) 039, arXiv:hep-ph/0601001

    arXiv 2006

  2. [1]

    A search for µ+ → e+γ with the first dataset of the MEG II experiment,

    MEG II, K. Afanaciev et al. , “A search for µ+ → e+γ with the first dataset of the MEG II experiment,” Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024) no. 3, 216, arXiv:2310.12614. [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 84, 1042 (2024)]

    arXiv 2024

  3. [2]

    COMET Phase-I Technical Design Report ,

    COMET, R. Abramishvili et al. , “COMET Phase-I Technical Design Report ,” PTEP 2020 (2020) no. 3, 033C01, arXiv:1812.09018

    arXiv 2020

  4. [3]

    Technical design of the phase I Mu3e experiment ,

    Mu3e, K. Arndt et al. , “Technical design of the phase I Mu3e experiment ,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1014 (2021) 165679, arXiv:2009.11690

    arXiv 2021

  5. [4]

    Neutrino mass models ,

    S. F. King, “ Neutrino mass models ,” Rept. Prog. Phys. 67 (2004) 107–158, arXiv:hep-ph/0310204

    arXiv 2004

  6. [5]

    Charged Lepton Flavour Violating meson decays in seesaw models ,

    P. C. Awasthi, J. More, A. K. Pradhan, K. Rao, P. Sahu, and S. U. Sankar, “ Charged Lepton Flavour Violating meson decays in seesaw models ,” JHEP 03 (2025) 183, arXiv:2410.10490

    arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Signatures of $A_4$ symmetry in the charged lepton flavour violating decays in a neutrino mass model

    R. Korrapati, J. More, U. Rahaman, and S. U. Sankar, “ Signatures of A4 symmetry in the charged lepton flavour violating decays in a neutrino mass model ,” Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) no. 5, 382, arXiv:2009.00865

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Finite flavour groups of fermions

    W. Grimus and P. O. Ludl, “ Finite flavour groups of fermions ,” J. Phys. A 45 (2012) 233001, arXiv:1110.6376

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

Show all 37 references
  1. [9]

    NuFit-6.0: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations ,

    I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J. P. Pinheiro, and T. Schwetz, “NuFit-6.0: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations ,” JHEP 12 (2024) 216, arXiv:2410.05380

    2024 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters ,

    Planck, N. Aghanim et al. , “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters ,” Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6, arXiv:1807.06209. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    2020 arXiv

  3. [11]

    The µ − e Conversion in Nuclei, µ → eγ, µ→ 3e Decays and TeV Scale See-Saw Scenarios of Neutrino Mass Generation ,

    D. N. Dinh, A. Ibarra, E. Molinaro, and S. T. Petcov, “ The µ − e Conversion in Nuclei, µ → eγ, µ→ 3e Decays and TeV Scale See-Saw Scenarios of Neutrino Mass Generation ,” JHEP 08 (2012) 125, arXiv:1205.4671. [Erratum: JHEP 09, 023 (2013)]

    2012 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Search for heavy neutral Higgs bosons decaying into a top quark pair in 140 fb −1 of proton-proton collision data at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector ,

    A TLAS, G. Aad et al. , “Search for heavy neutral Higgs bosons decaying into a top quark pair in 140 fb −1 of proton-proton collision data at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector ,” JHEP 08 (2024) 013, arXiv:2404.18986. – 18 –

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Search for lepton flavour violating decays of a neutral heavy Higgs boson to µτ and eτ in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV,

    CMS, A. M. Sirunyan et al. , “Search for lepton flavour violating decays of a neutral heavy Higgs boson to µτ and eτ in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV,” JHEP 03 (2020) 103, arXiv:1911.10267

    2020 arXiv

  6. [14]

    New limit on muon and electron lepton number violation from K 0 L → µ±e∓ decay,

    BNL, D. Ambrose et al. , “New limit on muon and electron lepton number violation from K 0 L → µ±e∓ decay,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 5734–5737, arXiv:hep-ex/9811038

    1998 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Search for the lepton-flavour violating decays B0 (s) → e±µ∓,

    LHCb, R. Aaij et al. , “Search for the lepton-flavour violating decays B0 (s) → e±µ∓,” JHEP 03 (2018) 078, arXiv:1710.04111

    2018 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Search for the lepton-flavour-violating decays B0 s → τ ±µ∓ and B0 → τ ±µ∓,

    LHCb, R. Aaij et al. , “Search for the lepton-flavour-violating decays B0 s → τ ±µ∓ and B0 → τ ±µ∓,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) no. 21, 211801, arXiv:1905.06614

    2019

  9. [17]

    Search for B0 → τ ±ℓ∓ (ℓ = e, µ) with a hadronic tagging method at Belle ,

    Belle, H. Atmacan et al. , “Search for B0 → τ ±ℓ∓ (ℓ = e, µ) with a hadronic tagging method at Belle ,” Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) no. 9, L091105, arXiv:2108.11649

    2021 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Search for B0 s → ℓ∓τ ± with the Semi-leptonic Tagging Method at Belle,

    Belle, L. Nayak et al. , “Search for B0 s → ℓ∓τ ± with the Semi-leptonic Tagging Method at Belle,” JHEP 08 (2023) 178, arXiv:2301.10989

    2023 arXiv

  11. [19]

    K → π semileptonic form factors with Nf = 2 + 1 + 1 twisted mass fermions ,

    N. Carrasco, P. Lami, V. Lubicz, L. Riggio, S. Simula, and C. Tarantino, “ K → π semileptonic form factors with Nf = 2 + 1 + 1 twisted mass fermions ,” Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) no. 11, 114512, arXiv:1602.04113

    2016 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Lepton flavor violation in exclusive b →dℓiℓj and b →sℓiℓj decay modes,

    D. Beˇ cirevi´ c, F. Jaffredo, J. P. Pinheiro, and O. Sumensari, “Lepton flavor violation in exclusive b →dℓiℓj and b →sℓiℓj decay modes,” Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) no. 7, 075004, arXiv:2407.19060

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    An Improved upper limit on the decay K + → π+µ+e−,

    A. Sher et al. , “An Improved upper limit on the decay K + → π+µ+e−,” Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 012005, arXiv:hep-ex/0502020

    2005 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Upper Limits on D± and B± Decays to Two Leptons Plus π± or K ±,

    A. J. Weir et al. , “Upper Limits on D± and B± Decays to Two Leptons Plus π± or K ±,” Phys. Rev. D 41 (1990) 1384

    1990

  15. [23]

    A search for the decay modes B+− → h+−τ +−l,

    BaBar, J. P. Lees et al., “A search for the decay modes B+− → h+−τ +−l,” Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 012004, arXiv:1204.2852

    2012 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Search for the rare decay B → πl+l−,

    BaBar, B. Aubert et al., “Search for the rare decay B → πl+l−,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 051801, arXiv:hep-ex/0703018

    2007 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Search for Lepton-Flavor Violating Decays B+ → K +µ±e∓,

    LHCb, R. Aaij et al. , “Search for Lepton-Flavor Violating Decays B+ → K +µ±e∓,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) no. 24, 241802, arXiv:1909.01010

    2019

  18. [26]

    Search for the Lepton Flavor Violating Decays B+ → K +τ ±ℓ∓(ℓ = e, µ) at Belle ,

    Belle, S. Watanuki et al. , “Search for the Lepton Flavor Violating Decays B+ → K +τ ±ℓ∓(ℓ = e, µ) at Belle ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) no. 26, 261802, arXiv:2212.04128

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Test of lepton flavor universality and search for lepton flavor violation in B → Kℓℓ decays,

    BELLE, S. Choudhury et al. , “Test of lepton flavor universality and search for lepton flavor violation in B → Kℓℓ decays,” JHEP 03 (2021) 105, arXiv:1908.01848

    2021 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Search for the lepton-flavour violating decays B0 → K ∗0µ±e∓ and B0 s → ϕµ±e∓,

    LHCb, R. Aaij et al. , “Search for the lepton-flavour violating decays B0 → K ∗0µ±e∓ and B0 s → ϕµ±e∓,” JHEP 06 (2023) 073, arXiv:2207.04005

    2023

  21. [29]

    Search for the lepton-flavour violating decays B0 → K ∗0τ ±µ∓,

    LHCb, R. Aaij et al. , “Search for the lepton-flavour violating decays B0 → K ∗0τ ±µ∓,” JHEP 06 (2023) 143, arXiv:2209.09846

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Search for the lepton-flavour-violating decays B0 → K ∗0τ ±e∓,

    LHCb, R. Aaij et al. , “Search for the lepton-flavour-violating decays B0 → K ∗0τ ±e∓,” arXiv:2506.15347

  23. [31]

    Search for the lepton-flavor violating decay B0 s → ϕµ±τ ∓,

    LHCb, R. Aaij et al. , “Search for the lepton-flavor violating decay B0 s → ϕµ±τ ∓,” Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) no. 7, 072014, arXiv:2405.13103. – 19 –

    2024

  24. [32]

    Search for the lepton-flavour violating decay D0 → e±µ∓,

    LHCb, R. Aaij et al. , “Search for the lepton-flavour violating decay D0 → e±µ∓,” Phys. Lett. B 754 (2016) 167–175, arXiv:1512.00322

    2016 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Search for lepton-flavor-violating decays D0 → X 0e±µ∓,

    BaBar, J. P. Lees et al. , “Search for lepton-flavor-violating decays D0 → X 0e±µ∓,” Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) no. 11, 112003, arXiv:2004.09457

    2020

  26. [34]

    Probes of flavour symmetry and violation with top quarks in ATLAS and CMS ,

    A TLAS, CMS, M. Watson, “Probes of flavour symmetry and violation with top quarks in ATLAS and CMS ,” in 17th International Workshop on Top Quark Physics . 1, 2025. arXiv:2501.14498

    2025

  27. [35]

    Search for charged-lepton flavour violation in top quark interactions with an up-type quark, a muon, and a τ lepton in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV ,

    CMS, A. Hayrapetyan et al. , “Search for charged-lepton flavour violation in top quark interactions with an up-type quark, a muon, and a τ lepton in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV ,” arXiv:2504.08532

  28. [36]

    Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.20 ppm ,

    Muon g-2, D. P. Aguillard et al. , “Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.20 ppm ,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) no. 16, 161802, arXiv:2308.06230

    2023

  29. [37]

    Search for Lepton Flavor Violating Tau Decays into Three Leptons with 719 Million Produced Tau+Tau- Pairs ,

    K. Hayasaka et al. , “Search for Lepton Flavor Violating Tau Decays into Three Leptons with 719 Million Produced Tau+Tau- Pairs ,” Phys. Lett. B 687 (2010) 139–143, arXiv:1001.3221. – 20 –

    2010 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.