Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

PointGauss: Point Cloud-Guided Multi-Object Segmentation for Gaussian Splatting

T0 review · 5 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read PointGauss segments Gaussian Splatting scenes directly through a point cloud decoder, producing 3D instance masks in under a minute and improving multi-view mIoU by up to 31.78%.

desk verdict The dataset is the most tangible contribution on this abstract; the method's core transfer step is plausible but unverified here. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.00259 v1 pith:J63CN574 submitted 2025-08-01 cs.CV

Wentao Sun , Hanqing Xu , Quanyun Wu , Dedong Zhang , Yiping Chen , Lingfei Ma , John S. Zelek , Jonathan Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords GaussianSplatting3Dinstancesegmentationpointcloudmulti-viewconsistencyradiancefieldsDesktopObjects-360real-time2Dmaskrendering
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces PointGauss, a framework that performs multi-object 3D segmentation directly on Gaussian Splatting representations. Instead of relying on slow initialization or per-scene supervision, it adapts point cloud segmentation to parse the Gaussian primitives themselves, producing 3D instance masks in under a minute. It also renders these masks into 2D views with GPU acceleration to keep segmentations consistent across viewpoints. On existing benchmarks the method reports multi-view mIoU gains of 1.89% to 31.78% over prior state of the art. The authors also contribute DesktopObjects-360, a large 360-degree dataset with multi-object scenes and globally consistent 2D and 3D masks, to address benchmark gaps.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the point cloud-based Gaussian primitive decoder, which treats the set of Gaussian primitives in a splatting scene as a point cloud and applies point cloud segmentation to generate 3D instance masks. A complementary GPU-accelerated 2D mask rendering system projects those 3D masks into multiple viewpoints, enforcing multi-view consistency. Together these components replace the usual per-scene optimization or clustering stage with a single forward pass through the scene representation.

What would settle it

Take a trained PointGauss model and evaluate it on a held-out Gaussian Splatting scene where the primitives have been re-sampled at a different density or with a different ordering but represent the same objects; if the 3D instance masks degrade substantially, the transferability assumption behind the method's speed and accuracy claims would collapse.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the entire Gaussian Splatting model can be treated as a point cloud for segmentation, turning the task into a point cloud parsing problem that runs in a single forward pass. A point cloud-based Gaussian primitive decoder consumes the primitives and outputs 3D instance masks without per-scene fine-tuning, while a GPU-accelerated 2D mask rendering system projects those masks into multiple views to enforce multi-view consistency. The paper reports that this direct primitive parsing is substantially faster than prior methods and improves multi-view mIoU by up to 31.78%. It also presents DesktopObjects-360 as a benchmark that fills gaps left by existing radiance-field segmentation datasets.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a point cloud segmentation model trained on conventional point clouds transfers directly to Gaussian primitives without any per-scene supervision and still produces accurate, multi-view-consistent masks.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, 3D instance segmentation from radiance fields no longer requires per-scene optimization, making interactive or real-time editing of captured scenes feasible.
  • Multi-view consistent masks from one forward pass could directly supervise downstream tasks such as object manipulation, scene understanding, or training dataset generation.
  • DesktopObjects-360 provides a common evaluation standard with 3D masks, so future radiance-field segmentation methods can be compared on multi-object, full-360-degree scenes rather than single-object benchmarks.
  • The speed claim (masks within one minute) would enable segmentation-driven Gaussian Splatting editing pipelines on typical consumer hardware.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method implicitly assumes Gaussian primitives behave like conventional point clouds; scenes with highly anisotropic, transparent, or overlapping primitives may require additional handling that the paper does not explicitly address.
  • The reported multi-view mIoU gains might not transfer directly to large outdoor scenes where point cloud segmentation models often degrade; testing on open-world categories would be a natural next step.
  • The benchmark's adoption of 3D evaluation masks could set a precedent that makes purely 2D-projection-based evaluations obsolete, though the metric's usefulness depends on how consistently masks are aligned across views.
  • Comparing the point cloud decoder against a directly trained transformer on Gaussian primitives would help isolate whether the speed and accuracy gains come from the point cloud prior or from the decoder architecture itself.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper introduces PointGauss, a point cloud-guided segmentation framework for multi-object segmentation in Gaussian splatting scenes, and a new dataset DesktopObjects-360. The abstract claims that the method generates 3D instance masks within 1 minute, achieves multi-view mIoU gains of 1.89% to 31.78% over prior state-of-the-art, and provides a large-scale benchmark with 360-degree coverage and 3D evaluation masks. The manuscript as supplied to the reviewer contains only the abstract; the technical body, equations, and experimental details are absent.

Significance. If substantiated, the claimed speed improvement (3D masks in under a minute) and the new benchmark would be valuable contributions to 3D scene understanding and radiance-field editing. The point cloud-guided Gaussian primitive decoder is an intriguing idea, and the dataset could fill a real gap in existing benchmarks. However, the abstract alone cannot establish these contributions; the key technical choices (input feature representation, baseline protocol, consistency guarantees) remain unspecified, and the missing full text prevents any verification of the numbers.

major comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract does not specify the input representation consumed by the point cloud segmentation model when it 'directly parses Gaussian primitives.' If the model sees only Gaussian centers, it discards covariance, opacity, and view-dependent features that encode object boundaries; if it sees all attributes, the input distribution differs significantly from ordinary point clouds. This mapping is the load-bearing transferability assumption, and the paper must define it and provide ablations or transfer experiments.
  2. [Abstract] The reported mIoU gains of 1.89%-31.78% are presented without a baseline protocol. I need to know which prior methods were compared, whether they used identical initialization, rendering, and optimization budgets, and whether the reported numbers are single runs or include variance. Without this, the improvements could stem from pipeline differences rather than the point-cloud-guided parsing itself.
  3. [Abstract] The claim that a 'GPU-accelerated 2D mask rendering system ensures multi-view consistency' is not supported by evidence in the abstract. Rendering masks from a single 3D segmentation does not automatically guarantee boundary-accurate consistency under occlusion or viewpoint-dependent appearance. The paper should either define a quantitative consistency metric and report it, or provide qualitative failure-case analysis in the full text.
  4. [Abstract] The DesktopObjects-360 dataset is announced but its description is insufficient. The abstract mentions over 27 thousand 2D masks, full 360-degree coverage, and 3D evaluation masks, but omits the number of scenes, object categories, annotation procedure, and how the 3D masks were generated. Since the dataset serves as the evaluation basis for the claimed gains, its quality and annotation protocol must be documented in detail.
  5. [Full manuscript] The submission contains only an abstract; no full text is provided. This makes it impossible to assess the soundness of the method, the experiments, or the reproducibility of the results. The authors should resubmit a complete manuscript before any further review.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The range '1.89 to 31.78%' is unusually wide; please specify whether these values correspond to different scenes, object categories, or baselines.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract uses 'instance masks' but evaluates with 'multi-view mIoU,' which is typically a semantic metric; clarify whether this is instance or semantic segmentation and how the metric is computed per instance.
  3. [Abstract] The term 'real-time' is used but the pipeline takes 'within 1 minute'; clarify whether real-time refers to rendering after a one-minute optimization, and what hardware is assumed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity detectable from the abstract; the pipeline's inputs and evaluation targets are external to each other.

full rationale

The available manuscript text (the abstract) describes a pipeline that consumes Gaussian primitives and point cloud segmentation features to produce 3D instance masks, which are then evaluated against mIoU benchmarks and runtime targets. None of the stated components is defined in terms of the evaluation metric, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The claimed performance gains are measured against prior methods and external datasets, and the introduced DesktopObjects-360 dataset is described as an independent benchmark. Without equations or a full method section, there is no basis to exhibit a specific reduction of a claimed result to its own input, so the circularity burden is not met. The transferability concern raised by the reader is a correctness or validation gap, not a circularity, because it concerns whether the point cloud model generalizes to Gaussian primitives rather than whether the result is true by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities are discernible from the abstract. The approach rests on standard point cloud segmentation and Gaussian splatting, plus the reliability of the new dataset.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Point cloud segmentation can be effectively transferred to Gaussian primitives
    The central method assumes that parsing Gaussian primitives via a point cloud segmentation pipeline preserves or improves segmentation accuracy without requiring per-scene optimization.
  • domain assumption The DesktopObjects-360 dataset provides globally consistent 2D annotations and 3D evaluation masks
    The claimed performance improvements depend on the quality and consistency of the new dataset's labels, which cannot be verified from the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of PointGauss: Point Cloud-Guided Multi-Object Segmentation for Gaussian Splatting." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/J63CN574

@misc{pith2026250800259,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: PointGauss: Point Cloud-Guided Multi-Object Segmentation for Gaussian Splatting},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/J63CN574}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.00259}
}
read the original abstract

We introduce PointGauss, a novel point cloud-guided framework for real-time multi-object segmentation in Gaussian Splatting representations. Unlike existing methods that suffer from prolonged initialization and limited multi-view consistency, our approach achieves efficient 3D segmentation by directly parsing Gaussian primitives through a point cloud segmentation-driven pipeline. The key innovation lies in two aspects: (1) a point cloud-based Gaussian primitive decoder that generates 3D instance masks within 1 minute, and (2) a GPU-accelerated 2D mask rendering system that ensures multi-view consistency. Extensive experiments demonstrate significant improvements over previous state-of-the-art methods, achieving performance gains of 1.89 to 31.78% in multi-view mIoU, while maintaining superior computational efficiency. To address the limitations of current benchmarks (single-object focus, inconsistent 3D evaluation, small scale, and partial coverage), we present DesktopObjects-360, a novel comprehensive dataset for 3D segmentation in radiance fields, featuring: (1) complex multi-object scenes, (2) globally consistent 2D annotations, (3) large-scale training data (over 27 thousand 2D masks), (4) full 360{\deg} coverage, and (5) 3D evaluation masks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CDSeg: A Renderable Gaussian Carrier for Image-to-3D Label Transfer

    cs.CV 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CDSeg lifts 2D masks into 3D by using the Gaussian splatting renderer to decide which primitives each pixel label belongs to, then fusing labels across views by voting.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    3D gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering

    Bernhard Kerbl, Georgios Kopanas, Thomas Leimk \"u hler, and George Drettakis. 3D gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering. ACM Trans. Graph., 42 0 (4): 0 139--1, 2023

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T

    Ben Mildenhall, Pratul P. Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T. Barron, Ravi Ramamoorthi, and Ren Ng. Nerf: representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis. Commun. ACM, 65 0 (1): 0 99–106, December 2021

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Vr-gs: A physical dynamics-aware interactive gaussian splatting system in virtual reality

    Ying Jiang, Chang Yu, Tianyi Xie, Xuan Li, Yutao Feng, Huamin Wang, Minchen Li, Henry Lau, Feng Gao, Yin Yang, and Chenfanfu Jiang. Vr-gs: A physical dynamics-aware interactive gaussian splatting system in virtual reality. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2024 Conference Papers, 2024 a

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Is 3dgs useful?: Comparing the effectiveness of recent reconstruction methods in vr

    Hyunjeong Kim and In-Kwon Lee. Is 3dgs useful?: Comparing the effectiveness of recent reconstruction methods in vr. In 2024 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), pages 71--80, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Drivinggaussian: Composite gaussian splatting for surrounding dynamic autonomous driving scenes

    Xiaoyu Zhou, Zhiwei Lin, Xiaojun Shan, Yongtao Wang, Deqing Sun, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. Drivinggaussian: Composite gaussian splatting for surrounding dynamic autonomous driving scenes. In 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 21634--21643, 2024 a

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Gs-planner: A gaussian-splatting-based planning framework for active high-fidelity reconstruction

    Rui Jin, Yuman Gao, Yingjian Wang, Yuze Wu, Haojian Lu, Chao Xu, and Fei Gao. Gs-planner: A gaussian-splatting-based planning framework for active high-fidelity reconstruction. In 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 11202--11209, 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Gs-slam: Dense visual slam with 3D gaussian splatting

    Chi Yan, Delin Qu, Dan Xu, Bin Zhao, Zhigang Wang, Dong Wang, and Xuelong Li. Gs-slam: Dense visual slam with 3D gaussian splatting. In 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 19595--19604, 2024 a

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Hidenobu Matsuki, Riku Murai, Paul H. J. Kelly, and Andrew J. Davison. Gaussian splatting slam. In 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 18039--18048, 2024

    work page 2024

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Multi-modal nerf self-supervision for lidar semantic segmentation

    Xavier Timoneda, Markus Herb, Fabian Duerr, Daniel Goehring, and Fisher Yu. Multi-modal nerf self-supervision for lidar semantic segmentation. In 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 12939--12946, 2024

    2024

  2. [10]

    Sanerf-hq: Segment anything for nerf in high quality

    Yichen Liu, Benran Hu, Chi-Keung Tang, and Yu-Wing Tai. Sanerf-hq: Segment anything for nerf in high quality. In 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 3216--3226, 2024

    2024

  3. [11]

    Garfield: Group anything with radiance fields

    Chung Min Kim, Mingxuan Wu, Justin Kerr, Ken Goldberg, Matthew Tancik, and Angjoo Kanazawa. Garfield: Group anything with radiance fields. In 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 21530--21539, 2024

    2024

  4. [12]

    Segment anything in 3D with nerfs

    Jiazhong Cen, Zanwei Zhou, Jiemin Fang, chen yang, Wei Shen, Lingxi Xie, Dongsheng Jiang, XIAOPENG ZHANG, and Qi Tian. Segment anything in 3D with nerfs. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 36, pages 25971--25990, 2023

    2023

  5. [13]

    Berg, Wan-Yen Lo, Piotr Dollar, and Ross Girshick

    Alexander Kirillov, Eric Mintun, Nikhila Ravi, Hanzi Mao, Chloe Rolland, Laura Gustafson, Tete Xiao, Spencer Whitehead, Alexander C. Berg, Wan-Yen Lo, Piotr Dollar, and Ross Girshick. Segment anything. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision ...

    2023

  6. [14]

    Gaussian grouping: Segment and edit anything in 3D scenes

    Mingqiao Ye, Martin Danelljan, Fisher Yu, and Lei Ke. Gaussian grouping: Segment and edit anything in 3D scenes. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), pages 162--179, 2025

    2025

  7. [15]

    Segment any 3d gaussians

    Jiazhong Cen, Jiemin Fang, Chen Yang, Lingxi Xie, Xiaopeng Zhang, Wei Shen, and Qi Tian. Segment any 3d gaussians. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 39 0 (2): 0 1971--1979, Apr. 2025

    1971

  8. [16]

    Click-gaussian: Interactive segmentation to any 3D gaussians

    Seokhun Choi, Hyeonseop Song, Jaechul Kim, Taehyeong Kim, and Hoseok Do. Click-gaussian: Interactive segmentation to any 3D gaussians. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), page 289–305, 2024

    2024

  9. [17]

    Omniseg3d: Omniversal 3D segmentation via hierarchical contrastive learning

    Haiyang Ying, Yixuan Yin, Jinzhi Zhang, Fan Wang, Tao Yu, Ruqi Huang, and Lu Fang. Omniseg3d: Omniversal 3D segmentation via hierarchical contrastive learning. In 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 20612--20622, 2024

    2024

  10. [18]

    Feature 3dgs: Supercharging 3D gaussian splatting to enable distilled feature fields

    Shijie Zhou, Haoran Chang, Sicheng Jiang, Zhiwen Fan, Zehao Zhu, Dejia Xu, Pradyumna Chari, Suya You, Zhangyang Wang, and Achuta Kadambi. Feature 3dgs: Supercharging 3D gaussian splatting to enable distilled feature fields. In 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pa...

    2024

  11. [19]

    Schwing, and Oliver Wang

    Zhongzheng Ren, Aseem Agarwala, Bryan Russell, Alexander G. Schwing, and Oliver Wang. Neural volumetric object selection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 6123--6132, 2022

    2022

  12. [20]

    Derpanis, Jonathan Kelly, Marcus A

    Ashkan Mirzaei, Tristan Aumentado-Armstrong, Konstantinos G. Derpanis, Jonathan Kelly, Marcus A. Brubaker, Igor Gilitschenski, and Alex Levinshtein. SPIn-NeRF : Multiview segmentation and perceptual inpainting with neural radiance fields. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confere...

    2023

  13. [21]

    A survey on 3d gaussian splatting

    Guikun Chen and Wenguan Wang. A survey on 3d gaussian splatting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.03890, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Gaussianobject: High-quality 3D object reconstruction from four views with gaussian splatting

    Chen Yang, Sikuang Li, Jiemin Fang, Ruofan Liang, Lingxi Xie, Xiaopeng Zhang, Wei Shen, and Qi Tian. Gaussianobject: High-quality 3D object reconstruction from four views with gaussian splatting. ACM Trans. Graph., 43 0 (6), November 2024 a

    2024

  15. [23]

    Dngaussian: Optimizing sparse-view 3d gaussian radiance fields with global-local depth normalization

    Jiahe Li, Jiawei Zhang, Xiao Bai, Jin Zheng, Xin Ning, Jun Zhou, and Lin Gu. Dngaussian: Optimizing sparse-view 3d gaussian radiance fields with global-local depth normalization. In 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 20775--20785, 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    Fsgs: Real-time few-shot view synthesis using gaussian splatting

    Zehao Zhu, Zhiwen Fan, Yifan Jiang, and Zhangyang Wang. Fsgs: Real-time few-shot view synthesis using gaussian splatting. In Computer Vision -- ECCV 2024, pages 145--163, Cham, 2025

    2024

  17. [25]

    Pixelsplat: 3d gaussian splats from image pairs for scalable generalizable 3d reconstruction

    David Charatan, Sizhe Lester Li, Andrea Tagliasacchi, and Vincent Sitzmann. Pixelsplat: 3d gaussian splats from image pairs for scalable generalizable 3d reconstruction. In 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 19457--19467, 2024

    2024

  18. [26]

    Compressed 3d gaussian splatting for accelerated novel view synthesis

    Simon Niedermayr, Josef Stumpfegger, and Rüdiger Westermann. Compressed 3d gaussian splatting for accelerated novel view synthesis. In 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 10349--10358, 2024

    2024

  19. [27]

    Compact 3D gaussian representation for radiance field

    Joo Chan Lee, Daniel Rho, Xiangyu Sun, Jong Hwan Ko, and Eunbyung Park. Compact 3D gaussian representation for radiance field. In 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 21719--21728, 2024

    2024

  20. [28]

    Gaussianimage: 1000 fps image representation and compression by 2d gaussian splatting

    Xinjie Zhang, Xingtong Ge, Tongda Xu, Dailan He, Yan Wang, Hongwei Qin, Guo Lu, Jing Geng, and Jun Zhang. Gaussianimage: 1000 fps image representation and compression by 2d gaussian splatting. In Computer Vision -- ECCV 2024, pages 327--345, Cham, 2025

    2024

  21. [29]

    Gaussianshader: 3d gaussian splatting with shading functions for reflective surfaces

    Yingwenqi Jiang, Jiadong Tu, Yuan Liu, Xifeng Gao, Xiaoxiao Long, Wenping Wang, and Yuexin Ma. Gaussianshader: 3d gaussian splatting with shading functions for reflective surfaces. In 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 5322--5332, 2024 b

    2024

  22. [30]

    Multi-scale 3d gaussian splatting for anti-aliased rendering

    Zhiwen Yan, Weng Fei Low, Yu Chen, and Gim Hee Lee. Multi-scale 3d gaussian splatting for anti-aliased rendering. In 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 20923--20931, 2024 b

    2024

  23. [31]

    Gaussian shadow casting for neural characters

    Luis Bolanos, Shih-Yang Su, and Helge Rhodin. Gaussian shadow casting for neural characters. In 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 20997--21006, 2024

    2024

  24. [32]

    Mip-splatting: Alias-free 3d gaussian splatting

    Zehao Yu, Anpei Chen, Binbin Huang, Torsten Sattler, and Andreas Geiger. Mip-splatting: Alias-free 3d gaussian splatting. In 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 19447--19456, 2024

    2024

  25. [33]

    Sugar: Surface-aligned gaussian splatting for efficient 3D mesh reconstruction and high-quality mesh rendering

    Antoine Guédon and Vincent Lepetit. Sugar: Surface-aligned gaussian splatting for efficient 3D mesh reconstruction and high-quality mesh rendering. In 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 5354--5363, 2024

    2024

  26. [34]

    Fregs: 3d gaussian splatting with progressive frequency regularization

    Jiahui Zhang, Fangneng Zhan, Muyu Xu, Shijian Lu, and Eric Xing. Fregs: 3d gaussian splatting with progressive frequency regularization. In 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 21424--21433, 2024

    2024

  27. [35]

    2D gaussian splatting for geometrically accurate radiance fields

    Binbin Huang, Zehao Yu, Anpei Chen, Andreas Geiger, and Shenghua Gao. 2D gaussian splatting for geometrically accurate radiance fields. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2024 Conference Papers, 2024

    2024

  28. [36]

    Scaffold-gs: Structured 3d gaussians for view-adaptive rendering

    Tao Lu, Mulin Yu, Linning Xu, Yuanbo Xiangli, Limin Wang, Dahua Lin, and Bo Dai. Scaffold-gs: Structured 3d gaussians for view-adaptive rendering. In 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 20654--20664, 2024

    2024

  29. [37]

    Language embedded 3d gaussians for open-vocabulary scene understanding

    Jin-Chuan Shi, Miao Wang, Hao-Bin Duan, and Shao-Hua Guan. Language embedded 3d gaussians for open-vocabulary scene understanding. In 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 5333--5343, 2024

    2024

  30. [38]

    4d gaussian splatting for real-time dynamic scene rendering

    Guanjun Wu, Taoran Yi, Jiemin Fang, Lingxi Xie, Xiaopeng Zhang, Wei Wei, Wenyu Liu, Qi Tian, and Xinggang Wang. 4d gaussian splatting for real-time dynamic scene rendering. In 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 20310--20320, 2024 a

    2024

  31. [39]

    Deformable 3d gaussians for high-fidelity monocular dynamic scene reconstruction

    Ziyi Yang, Xinyu Gao, Wen Zhou, Shaohui Jiao, Yuqing Zhang, and Xiaogang Jin. Deformable 3d gaussians for high-fidelity monocular dynamic scene reconstruction. In 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 20331--20341, 2024 b

    2024

  32. [40]

    Don't splat your gaussians: Volumetric ray-traced primitives for modeling and rendering scattering and emissive media

    Jorge Condor, Sebastien Speierer, Lukas Bode, Aljaz Bozic, Simon Green, Piotr Didyk, and Adrian Jarabo. Don't splat your gaussians: Volumetric ray-traced primitives for modeling and rendering scattering and emissive media. ACM Trans. Graph., 44 0 (1), February 2025

    2025

  33. [41]

    3d gaussian ray tracing: Fast tracing of particle scenes

    Nicolas Moenne-Loccoz, Ashkan Mirzaei, Or Perel, Riccardo de Lutio, Janick Martinez Esturo, Gavriel State, Sanja Fidler, Nicholas Sharp, and Zan Gojcic. 3d gaussian ray tracing: Fast tracing of particle scenes. ACM Trans. Graph., 43 0 (6), November 2024

    2024

  34. [42]

    Qi, Li Yi, Hao Su, and Leonidas J

    Charles R. Qi, Li Yi, Hao Su, and Leonidas J. Guibas. Pointnet++: deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS'17, page 5105–5114, 2017

    2017

  35. [43]

    Svaseg: Sparse voxel-based attention for 3D lidar point cloud semantic segmentation

    Lin Zhao, Siyuan Xu, Liman Liu, Delie Ming, and Wenbing Tao. Svaseg: Sparse voxel-based attention for 3D lidar point cloud semantic segmentation. Remote Sensing, 14 0 (18), 2022

    2022

  36. [44]

    Learning multi-view aggregation in the wild for large-scale 3D semantic segmentation

    Damien Robert, Bruno Vallet, and Loic Landrieu. Learning multi-view aggregation in the wild for large-scale 3D semantic segmentation. In 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 5565--5574, 2022

    2022

  37. [45]

    Point transformer v3: Simpler faster stronger

    Xiaoyang Wu, Li Jiang, Peng-Shuai Wang, Zhijian Liu, Xihui Liu, Yu Qiao, Wanli Ouyang, Tong He, and Hengshuang Zhao. Point transformer v3: Simpler faster stronger. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 4840--4851, 2024 b

    2024

  38. [46]

    3d-sis: 3D semantic instance segmentation of rgb-d scans

    Ji Hou, Angela Dai, and Matthias Nießner. 3d-sis: 3D semantic instance segmentation of rgb-d scans. In 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 4416--4425, 2019

    2019

  39. [47]

    A click-based interactive segmentation network for point clouds

    Wentao Sun, Zhipeng Luo, Yiping Chen, Huxiong Li, Jos \'e Marcato Junior, Wesley Nunes Gon \'e alves, and Jonathan Li. A click-based interactive segmentation network for point clouds. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 61: 0 1--12, 2023

    2023

  40. [48]

    Sgpn: Similarity group proposal network for 3D point cloud instance segmentation

    Weiyue Wang, Ronald Yu, Qiangui Huang, and Ulrich Neumann. Sgpn: Similarity group proposal network for 3D point cloud instance segmentation. In 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 2569--2578, 2018

    2018

  41. [49]

    Cloudcompare (version 2.13.2) [gpl software], 2024

    CloudCompare. Cloudcompare (version 2.13.2) [gpl software], 2024. URL http://www.cloudcompare.org/

    2024

  42. [50]

    Neo 360: Neural fields for sparse view synthesis of outdoor scenes

    Muhammad Zubair Irshad, Sergey Zakharov, Katherine Liu, Vitor Guizilini, Thomas Kollar, Adrien Gaidon, Zsolt Kira, and Rares Ambrus. Neo 360: Neural fields for sparse view synthesis of outdoor scenes. In 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 9...

    2023

  43. [51]

    Schönberger and Jan-Michael Frahm

    Johannes L. Schönberger and Jan-Michael Frahm. Structure-from-motion revisited. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 4104--4113, 2016

    2016

  44. [52]

    Sch \"o nberger, Enliang Zheng, Jan-Michael Frahm, and Marc Pollefeys

    Johannes L. Sch \"o nberger, Enliang Zheng, Jan-Michael Frahm, and Marc Pollefeys. Pixelwise view selection for unstructured multi-view stereo. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), pages 501--518, 2016

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.