pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.00402 · v1 · submitted 2025-08-01 · ✦ hep-ph

Analysis of the hadronic molecules DK, D^*K, DK^* and their bottom analogs with QCD sum rules

Ze Zhou , Guo-Liang Yu , Zhi-Gang Wang , Jie Lu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 01:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords QCD sum ruleshadronic moleculestetraquarkscharm-strange statesbottom analogsD_s0(2317)molecular states
0
0 comments X

The pith

QCD sum rules give masses for DK, D*K and DK* molecules that match D_s0(2317), D_s1(2460) and D_s1(2536).

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies two-point QCD sum rules to color-singlet-color-singlet currents for hadronic molecules formed from charm-strange and bottom-strange meson pairs. Condensates are kept up to dimension 12 and Borel windows plus continuum thresholds are chosen to extract masses and residues. The resulting values for the DK, D*K and DK* systems sit at 2.322, 2.457 and 2.538 GeV and line up with the experimental masses of D_s0(2317), D_s1(2460) and D_s1(2536). For the bottom sector the BK* mass falls below its threshold while the BK and B*K masses lie above theirs.

Core claim

By constructing color-singlet-color-singlet interpolating currents and using QCD sum rules with vacuum condensates up to dimension 12, the masses of the DK, D*K and DK* molecular states are predicted to be 2.322 GeV, 2.457 GeV and 2.538 GeV, respectively; these values agree with the observed D_s0(2317), D_s1(2460) and D_s1(2536). The BK* molecular state is predicted at 6.158 GeV, below the BK* threshold, implying a possible bound state.

What carries the argument

Color-singlet-color-singlet interpolating currents inserted into two-point QCD sum rules to extract masses of tetraquark molecular states.

If this is right

  • The D_s0(2317) can be interpreted as a DK molecular state.
  • The D_s1(2460) and D_s1(2536) can be interpreted as D*K and DK* molecular states.
  • The BK* system may form a bound molecular state below its two-meson threshold.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same current construction and sum-rule setup could be applied to other heavy-light molecular candidates to test consistency across flavor sectors.
  • Lattice QCD or decay-width calculations could provide an independent check on whether the predicted pole residues align with observed branching ratios.
  • Observation of a narrow resonance near 6.158 GeV in the B K* channel would strengthen the molecular interpretation for the bottom sector.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen currents faithfully represent the molecular configurations and the operator product expansion truncated at dimension 12 with the selected Borel windows produces reliable mass predictions.

What would settle it

A high-precision measurement showing that the mass of the candidate BK* state lies above the BK* threshold or that the D_s0(2317) lacks a dominant molecular component would contradict the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.00402 by Guo-Liang Yu, Jie Lu, Ze Zhou, Zhi-Gang Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The masses of the tetraquark molecular states with va [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The absolute values of di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The pole and continuum contributions with variation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this work, we construct the color-singlet-color-singlet type currents to study the masses and pole residues of charm-strange tetraquark states and their bottom analogs with $J^P$ = $0^+$ and $1^+$ by using two-point QCD sum rules, where the vacuum condensates are considered up to dimension 12. The predicted masses for $DK$, $D^*K$ and $DK^*$ molecular states are $2.322_{ - 0.072}^{ + 0.066}$ GeV, $2.457_{ - 0.068}^{ + 0.064}$ GeV and $2.538_{ - 0.062}^{ + 0.059}$ GeV. These results are consistent well with the experimental data of $D_{s0}(2317)$, $D_{s1}(2460)$ and ${D}_{s1}(2536)$, respectively. The theoretical results for $BK$ and $B^*K$ molecular states are $5.970_{ - 0.064}^{ + 0.061}$ GeV and $6.050_{ - 0.064}^{ + 0.062}$ GeV which are all higher than their own thresholds. Finally, the mass of hadronic molecule $BK^*$ is predicted to be $6.158_{ - 0.063}^{ + 0.061}$ GeV. This value is lower than the threshold of $BK^*$, which implies that it may be a bound hadronic molecular state.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper constructs color-singlet-color-singlet interpolating currents for DK, D*K, DK* and bottom analogs with J^P=0^+ and 1^+, then applies two-point QCD sum rules including vacuum condensates up to dimension 12. It reports masses 2.322_{-0.072}^{+0.066} GeV, 2.457_{-0.068}^{+0.064} GeV and 2.538_{-0.062}^{+0.059} GeV for the charm molecular states, consistent with D_s0(2317), D_s1(2460) and D_s1(2536); the bottom BK* state is predicted at 6.158 GeV below threshold and interpreted as a possible bound state.

Significance. If the mass predictions and their uncertainties hold after verification of OPE convergence, the work supplies concrete support for the molecular assignment of three observed charm-strange states and offers a falsifiable prediction for a bound BK* state. The explicit inclusion of dimension-10 and -12 condensates is a methodological strength that allows direct assessment of truncation error in the molecular-current channel.

major comments (2)
  1. [Numerical analysis] Numerical analysis section: the manuscript asserts Borel stability and OPE convergence up to dimension 12 inside the chosen windows, yet provides no table or figure that quantifies the fractional contribution of each condensate (especially dim-10 and dim-12) relative to the leading terms for any of the six currents. Without this breakdown it is impossible to confirm that higher-dimensional terms remain perturbative, which directly affects the reliability of the quoted ~60 MeV uncertainties.
  2. [Numerical analysis] Section on continuum threshold choice: s0 is selected near the expected mass squared for each channel. This introduces a moderate circularity that is not mitigated by a systematic scan or by reporting the pole dominance ratio as a function of s0; the central values therefore depend on a parameter choice whose sensitivity is only partially captured by the quoted errors.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract quotes asymmetric errors but does not state whether they arise solely from M^2 and s0 variation or also include condensate uncertainties; a brief clarification would improve reproducibility.
  2. [Introduction] Notation for the molecular currents (color-singlet-color-singlet) is introduced without an explicit equation reference in the main text; adding the defining expression as Eq. (X) would aid readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments, which will help improve the clarity of our numerical analysis. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Numerical analysis section: the manuscript asserts Borel stability and OPE convergence up to dimension 12 inside the chosen windows, yet provides no table or figure that quantifies the fractional contribution of each condensate (especially dim-10 and dim-12) relative to the leading terms for any of the six currents. Without this breakdown it is impossible to confirm that higher-dimensional terms remain perturbative, which directly affects the reliability of the quoted ~60 MeV uncertainties.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit breakdown of the individual condensate contributions would strengthen the demonstration of OPE convergence. In the revised manuscript we will add a new table that reports the fractional contribution of each condensate (dimensions 4 through 12) relative to the perturbative term, evaluated at the central Borel parameter and s0 for all six currents. This will confirm that the dim-10 and dim-12 terms remain below the 10% level, supporting the quoted uncertainties. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Section on continuum threshold choice: s0 is selected near the expected mass squared for each channel. This introduces a moderate circularity that is not mitigated by a systematic scan or by reporting the pole dominance ratio as a function of s0; the central values therefore depend on a parameter choice whose sensitivity is only partially captured by the quoted errors.

    Authors: We selected s0 to ensure both Borel stability and pole dominance greater than 50% while varying it by approximately 0.5 GeV² to estimate uncertainties. To address the concern about circularity more transparently, the revised manuscript will include an additional figure (or table) showing the pole contribution ratio as a function of s0 for each channel. This will demonstrate the stability of the extracted masses within the chosen windows and make the sensitivity analysis fully explicit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Standard QCD sum-rule parameter choice with limited self-reference

full rationale

The derivation proceeds from color-singlet-color-singlet interpolating currents through the standard OPE truncated at dimension 12, Borel transformation, and extraction of the ground-state mass via the ratio of moments. Vacuum condensates are taken from external literature and are not fitted to the target states. Continuum thresholds and Borel windows are chosen to enforce pole dominance and stability, which is conventional methodology rather than a direct renaming or fitting of the output mass to the input. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a self-citation or to the final mass value itself; the central predictions therefore retain independent content from the OPE.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The calculation rests on the operator product expansion truncated at dimension 12, standard numerical values for quark and gluon condensates, and the assumption that the chosen molecular currents dominate the spectral density in the chosen Borel window.

free parameters (2)
  • Borel mass M^2
    Varied within a window to ensure OPE convergence and pole dominance; not fixed by external data.
  • Continuum threshold s0
    Chosen near the expected resonance mass squared to separate ground-state contribution.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption OPE converges sufficiently when truncated at dimension 12
    Standard assumption in QCD sum-rule analyses of heavy-light systems.
  • domain assumption Color-singlet-color-singlet currents couple strongly to the molecular states
    Central modeling choice for interpreting the states as hadronic molecules.
invented entities (1)
  • DK, D*K, DK* and BK, B*K, BK* molecular states no independent evidence
    purpose: To model the tetraquarks as loosely bound meson-meson systems
    Postulated configurations whose existence is tested by the mass predictions

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5833 in / 1537 out tokens · 59248 ms · 2026-05-19T01:51:39.191074+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 94 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    to further calculate the correlation function, and the correlation fu nction in the QCD side can also be expanded in different tensor struc- tures which are the same as Eq. ( 5) in the phenomenological side, ΠQCD0(p) = ΠQCD0(p2) ΠQCD1 µν (p) = ΠQCD1 gµν (p2)gµν+ ΠQCD1 pµpν (p2)pµpν ΠQCD2 µν (p) = ΠQCD2 gµν (p2)gµν+ ΠQCD2 pµpν (p2)pµpν (11) where ΠQCD0(p2),...

    work page

  2. [2]

    1) GeV2, ⣨ αsGG π ⟩ = (0. 012±0. 004) GeV4 at the energy scalar µ=1 GeV with q = u and d quarks [76, 77, 85]. It is noted that the the masses of c and b quarks and the values of vacuum condensates are energy dependent, which can be expressed as follows by using the renormlization grou p equation(RGE), ⟨ ¯qq⟩ (µ) = ⟨ ¯qq⟩ (1GeV) [ αs(1GeV) αs(µ) ] 12 33−2n...

    work page

  3. [3]

    It is also shown that contribution s from condensate terms ( n > 8) become smaller with increase of n

    From this figure, we notice that condensate terms with dimension n =3, 6 and 8 play important roles to the final results. It is also shown that contribution s from condensate terms ( n > 8) become smaller with increase of n. Therefore, the convergence of OPE is satisfied. As for the pole contributions of di fferent molecular states, we show them in Fig. 4 in ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    970+0. 061 −0. 064 GeV , 6. 050+0. 062 −0. 064 GeV and 6. 158+0. 061 −0. 063 GeV , respec- 6 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 n 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 |D(n)| DK * D*K B*K BK * BK DK FIG. 3: The absolute values of di fferent dimensional contributions of tetraquark molecular states. tively, where theoretical value of BK ∗is consistent well with the measuring...

    work page

  5. [5]

    In addition, studying the production of these physical states from the nonleptonic B decay process is also essential to recognize their inner structure

    22 [9]. In addition, studying the production of these physical states from the nonleptonic B decay process is also essential to recognize their inner structure. As for the two other predic ted resonance states BK, B∗K, the information of decay width is also very attractive for us, which can help to discover these states in experiments in the future, and t...

    work page

  6. [6]

    050+0. 062 −0. 064 GeV . Further theoretical analysis about the decay width of these charm /bottom strange hadronic molecules is very helpful to confirm the inner structure of these physical states. The predicted pole residues in the present work are i m- portant input parameters in three-point QCD sum rules which can be used to study the decay properties ...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Aubert et al

    B. Aubert et al. [BaBar], Observation of a narrow meson decaying to D+ s π0 at a mass of 2.32 GeV /c2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 242001 (2003)

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    Besson et al

    D. Besson et al. [CLEO], Observation of a narrow resonance of mass 2.46 GeV /c2 decaying to D∗+ s π0 and confirmation of the D∗ sJ (2317) state, Phys. Rev. D 68, 032002 (2003)

    work page 2003

  9. [9]

    Krokovny et al

    P . Krokovny et al. [Belle], Observation of the DsJ (2317) and DsJ (2457) in B decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 262002 (2003)

    work page 2003

  10. [10]

    Aubert et al

    B. Aubert et al. [BaBar], Study of B → D(∗)+ sJ ¯D(∗) decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 181801 (2004)

    work page 2004

  11. [11]

    Aubert et al

    B. Aubert et al. [BaBar], A Study of the D∗ sJ (2317) and DsJ (2460) Mesons in Inclusive c¯c Production Near √s = 10.6 GeV ,Phys. Rev. D 74, 032007 (2006)

    work page 2006

  12. [12]

    Observation of a New Charmed - Strange Meson,

    H. Albrecht et al. [ARGUS], “Observation of a New Charmed - Strange Meson,” Phys. Lett. B 230, 162 (1989)

    work page 1989

  13. [13]

    Mikami et al

    Y . Mikami et al. [Belle], Measurements of the DsJ resonance properties, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 012002 (2004)

    work page 2004

  14. [14]

    Measurement of the D_(sJ)(2317) and D_(sJ)(2460) Properties in e^+ e^- --> c c-bar Production

    B. Aubert et al. [BaBar], Measurement of the DsJ (2317)+ and DsJ (2460)+ properties in e+e− → c¯c production, arXiv:hep-ex/0408067 [hep-ex] (2004)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  15. [15]

    Aubert et al

    B. Aubert et al. [BaBar], Observation of a narrow me- son decaying to D+ s π0γ at a mass of 2.458 GeV /c2, Phys. Rev. D 69, 031101 (2004)

    work page 2004

  16. [16]

    E. K. Akhmedov and M. Frigerio, Duality in Left-Right Symmetric Seesaw Mechanism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 061802 (2006)

    work page 2006

  17. [17]

    Navas et al

    S. Navas et al. [Particle Data Group], Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Godfrey and N

    S. Godfrey and N. Isgur, Mesons in a Relativized Quark Mo del with Chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 32, 189 (1985)

    work page 1985

  19. [19]

    Godfrey and R

    S. Godfrey and R. Kokoski, The Properties of p Wave Meson s with One Heavy Quark, Phys. Rev. D 43, 1679 (1991)

    work page 1991

  20. [20]

    Di Pierro and E

    M. Di Pierro and E. Eichten, Excited Heavy - Light System s and Hadronic Transitions, Phys. Rev. D 64, 114004 (2001) . 7

    work page 2001

  21. [21]

    G. Moir, M. Peardon, S. M. Ryan, C. E. Thomas and L. Liu, Excited spectroscopy of charmed mesons from lattice QCD, JHEP 05, 021 (2013)

    work page 2013

  22. [22]

    S. Q. Luo, B. Chen, Z. W. Liu and X. Liu, Resolving the low mass puzzle of Λc(2940)+, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 301 (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Y . S. Kalashnikova, Coupled-channel model for charmonium levels and an option for X(3872), Phys. Rev. D 72, 034010 (2005)

    work page 2005

  24. [24]

    Nielsen, R

    M. Nielsen, R. D. Matheus, F. S. Navarra, M. E. Bracco and A. Lozea, Diquark-antidiquark with open charm in QCD sum rules, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 161, 193 (2006)

    work page 2006

  25. [25]

    Z. G. Wang and S. L. Wan, Ds0(2317) as a tetraquark state with QCD sum rules in heavy quark limit, Nucl. Phys. A 778, 22 (2006)

    work page 2006

  26. [26]

    Y . Q. Chen and X. Q. Li, A Comprehensive four- quark interpretation of Ds(2317), Ds(2457) and Ds(2632), Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 232001 (2004)

    work page 2004

  27. [27]

    Dmitrasinovic, D+ s0(2317)-D0(2308) mass di fference as evi- dence for tetraquarks, Phys

    V . Dmitrasinovic, D+ s0(2317)-D0(2308) mass di fference as evi- dence for tetraquarks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 162002 (2005)

    work page 2005

  28. [28]

    H. Y . Cheng and W. S. Hou, B decays as spectroscope for charmed four quark states, Phys. Lett. B 566, 193 (2003)

    work page 2003

  29. [29]

    Terasaki, BABAR resonance as a new window of hadron physics, Phys

    K. Terasaki, BABAR resonance as a new window of hadron physics, Phys. Rev. D 68, 011501 (2003)

    work page 2003

  30. [30]

    Dmitrasinovic, D∗+ s (2317) and D∗+ s (2460): Tetraquarks bound by the t Hooft instanton-induced interaction?, Phys

    V . Dmitrasinovic, D∗+ s (2317) and D∗+ s (2460): Tetraquarks bound by the t Hooft instanton-induced interaction?, Phys. Rev. D 70, 096011 (2004)

    work page 2004

  31. [31]

    Kim and Y

    H. Kim and Y . Oh, Ds(2317) as a four-quark state in QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 72, 074012 (2005)

    work page 2005

  32. [32]

    J. R. Zhang, Revisiting D∗ s0(2317) as a 0 + tetraquark state from QCD sum rules, Phys. Lett. B 789, 432 (2019)

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    W. A. Bardeen, E. J. Eichten and C. T. Hill, Chiral Multip lets of Heavy - Light Mesons, Phys. Rev. D 68, 054024 (2003)

    work page 2003

  34. [34]

    Deandrea, G

    A. Deandrea, G. Nardulli and A. D. Polosa, On the Mass of t he Ds(0+, 1+) system, Phys. Rev. D 68, 097501 (2003)

    work page 2003

  35. [35]

    Y . B. Dai, C. S. Huang, C. Liu and S. L. Zhu, Understand- ing the D+ sJ (2317) and D+ sJ (2460) with sum rules in HQET, Phys. Rev. D 68, 114011 (2003)

    work page 2003

  36. [36]

    Sadzikowski, The Masses of D∗ s j(2317) and D∗ s j(2463) in the MIT bag model, Phys

    M. Sadzikowski, The Masses of D∗ s j(2317) and D∗ s j(2463) in the MIT bag model, Phys. Lett. B 579, 39 (2004)

    work page 2004

  37. [37]

    R. N. Cahn and J. D. Jackson, Spin orbit and tensor forces in heavy quark light quark mesons: Implications of the new Ds state at 2.32 GeV ,Phys. Rev. D 68, 037502 (2003)

    work page 2003

  38. [38]

    D. S. Hwang and D. W. Kim, Mass of D∗ sJ (2317) and coupled channel effect, Phys. Lett. B 601, 137 (2004)

    work page 2004

  39. [39]

    Y . A. Simonov and J. A. Tjon, The Coupled-channel analys is of the D and Ds mesons, Phys. Rev. D 70, 114013 (2004)

    work page 2004

  40. [40]

    H. Y . Cheng and F. S. Y u, Near mass degeneracy in the scalar meson sector: Implications for B∗ (s)0 and B′ (s)1 mesons, Phys. Rev. D 89, 114017 (2014)

    work page 2014

  41. [41]

    Q. T. Song, D. Y . Chen, X. Liu and T. Matsuki, Charmed- strange mesons revisited: mass spectra and strong decays, Phys. Rev. D 91, 054031 (2015)

    work page 2015

  42. [42]

    H. Y . Cheng and F. S. Y u, Masses of Scalar and Axial-V ector B Mesons Revisited, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 668 (2017)

    work page 2017

  43. [43]

    S. Q. Luo, B. Chen, X. Liu and T. Matsuki, Predicting a new resonance as charmed-strange baryonic analog of D∗ s0(2317), Phys. Rev. D 103, 074027 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    Z. Y . Zhou and Z. Xiao, Two-pole structures in a relativi stic Friedrichs–Lee-QPC scheme, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 551 (2021)

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    M. H. Alhakami, Mass Spectra of Heavy-Light Mesons in Heavy Hadron Chiral Perturbation Theory, Phys. Rev. D 93, 094007 (2016)

    work page 2016

  46. [46]

    Vijande, F

    J. Vijande, F. Fernandez and A. V alcarce, Open-charm me son spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. D 73, 034002 (2006)

    work page 2006

  47. [47]

    Maiani, F

    L. Maiani, F. Piccinini, A. D. Polosa and V . Riquer, Diqu ark- antidiquarks with hidden or open charm and the nature of X(3872), Phys. Rev. D 71, 014028 (2005)

    work page 2005

  48. [48]

    Y . B. Dai, X. Q. Li, S. L. Zhu and Y . B. Zuo, Contribu- tion of DK continuum in the QCD sum rule for DsJ (2317), Eur. Phys. J. C 55, 249 (2008)

    work page 2008

  49. [49]

    T. E. Browder, S. Pakvasa and A. A. Petrov, Comment on the new D∗+ s π0 resonances, Phys. Lett. B 578, 365 (2004)

    work page 2004

  50. [50]

    van Beveren and G

    E. van Beveren and G. Rupp, Observed Ds(2317) and tentative D(2100–2300) as the charmed cousins of the light scalar nonet , Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 012003 (2003)

    work page 2003

  51. [51]

    L. Liu, K. Orginos, F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart and U. G. Meiss- ner, Interactions of charmed mesons with light pseudoscala r mesons from lattice QCD and implications on the nature of the D∗ s0(2317), Phys. Rev. D 87, 014508 (2013)

    work page 2013

  52. [52]

    Barnes, F

    T. Barnes, F. E. Close and H. J. Lipkin, Implications of a DK molecule at 2.32 GeV ,Phys. Rev. D 68, 054006 (2003)

    work page 2003

  53. [53]

    L. Roca, J. M. Dias and E. Oset, The Ds1(2460) → Dsπ+π− decay from a Ds1 molecular perspective, arXiv:2502.18401 [hep-ph] (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    S. Y . Kong, J. T. Zhu, D. Song and J. He, Heavy-strange mes on molecules and possible candidates D∗ s0(2317), Ds1(2460), and X0(2900), Phys. Rev. D 104, 094012 (2021)

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    E. E. Kolomeitsev and M. F. M. Lutz, On Heavy light meson resonances and chiral symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 582, 39 (2004)

    work page 2004

  56. [56]

    A. P . Szczepaniak, Description of the D∗ s(2320) resonance as the Dπatom, Phys. Lett. B 567, 23 (2003)

    work page 2003

  57. [57]

    Hofmann and M

    J. Hofmann and M. F. M. Lutz, Open charm meson resonances with negative strangeness, Nucl. Phys. A 733, 142 (2004)

    work page 2004

  58. [58]

    Gamermann, E

    D. Gamermann, E. Oset, D. Strottman and M. J. Vicente V ac as, Dynamically generated open and hidden charm meson systems, Phys. Rev. D 76, 074016 (2007)

    work page 2007

  59. [59]

    J. M. Flynn and J. Nieves, Elastic s-wave Bπ, Dπ, DK and Kπscattering from lattice calculations of scalar form-facto rs in semileptonic decays, Phys. Rev. D 75, 074024 (2007)

    work page 2007

  60. [60]

    Faessler, T

    A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, V . E. Lyubovitskij and Y . L. Ma, Strong and radiative decays of the D∗ s0(2317) meson in the DK- molecule picture, Phys. Rev. D 76, 014005 (2007)

    work page 2007

  61. [61]

    F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart and U. G. Meissner, Interactions be - tween heavy mesons and Goldstone bosons from chiral dynam- ics, Eur. Phys. J. A 40, 171 (2009)

    work page 2009

  62. [62]

    Z. X. Xie, G. Q. Feng and X. H. Guo, Analyzing D∗+ s0 (2317) in the DK molecule picture in the Beth-Salpeter approach, Phys. Rev. D 81, 036014 (2010)

    work page 2010

  63. [63]

    Cleven, F

    M. Cleven, F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart and U. G. Meissner, Light meson mass dependence of the positive parity heavy-strange mesons, Eur. Phys. J. A 47, 19 (2011)

    work page 2011

  64. [64]

    X. G. Wu and Q. Zhao, The mixing of Ds1(2460) and Ds1(2536), Phys. Rev. D 85, 034040 (2012)

    work page 2012

  65. [65]

    Z. H. Guo, U. G. Meißner and D. L. Yao, New in- sights into the D∗ s0(2317) and other charm scalar mesons, Phys. Rev. D 92, 094008 (2015)

    work page 2015

  66. [66]

    Albaladejo, D

    M. Albaladejo, D. Jido, J. Nieves and E. Oset, D∗ s0(2317) and DK scattering in B decays from BaBar and LHCb data, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 300 (2016)

    work page 2016

  67. [67]

    M. L. Du, F. K. Guo, U. G. Meißner and D. L. Yao, Study of open-charm 0 + states in unitarized chiral e ffective theory with one-loop potentials, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 728 (2017)

    work page 2017

  68. [68]

    Albaladejo, P

    M. Albaladejo, P . Fernandez-Soler, J. Nieves and P . G. O r- tega, Contribution of constituent quark model c ¯s states to the dynamics of the D∗ s0(2317) and Ds1(2460) resonances, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 722 (2018)

    work page 2018

  69. [69]

    Z. H. Guo, L. Liu, U. G. Meißner, J. A. Oller and A. Ruset- sky, Towards a precise determination of the scattering ampl i- 8 tudes of the charmed and light-flavor pseudoscalar mesons, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 13 (2019)

    work page 2019

  70. [70]

    T. W. Wu, M. Z. Liu, L. S. Geng, E. Hiyama and M. P . V alder- rama, DK, DDK , and DDDK molecules–understanding the na- ture of the D∗ s0(2317), Phys. Rev. D 100, 034029 (2019)

    work page 2019

  71. [71]

    E. B. Gregory, F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart, S. Krieg and T. Luu, C on- firmation of the existence of an exotic state in the πD system, arXiv:2106.15391 [hep-ph] (2021)

    work page arXiv 2021

  72. [72]

    Wang and X

    P . Wang and X. G. Wang, Study on 0 + states with open charm in unitarized heavy meson chiral approach, Phys. Rev. D 86, 014030 (2012)

    work page 2012

  73. [73]

    B. L. Huang, Z. Y . Lin and S. L. Zhu, Light pseudoscalar meson and heavy meson scattering lengths to O(p4) in heavy meson chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D 105, 036016 (2022)

    work page 2022

  74. [74]

    H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y . R. Liu and S. L. Zhu, A review of the open charm and open bottom systems, Rept. Prog. Phys. 80, 076201 (2017)

    work page 2017

  75. [75]

    Y . R. Liu, H. X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, Pentaquark and Tetraquark states, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 107, 237-320 (2019)

    work page 2019

  76. [76]

    J. X. Lin, H. X. Chen, W. H. Liang, C. W. Xiao and E. Oset, ¯B0 s → Ds1(2460)+K−, Ds1(2536)+K− and the nature of the two Ds1 resonances, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 439 (2024)

    work page 2024

  77. [77]

    Gamermann and E

    D. Gamermann and E. Oset, Axial resonances in the open an d hidden charm sectors, Eur. Phys. J. A 33, 119 (2007)

    work page 2007

  78. [78]

    F. K. Guo, P . N. Shen, H. C. Chiang, R. G. Ping and B. S. Zou, Dynamically generated 0 + heavy mesons in a heavy chiral uni- tary approach, Phys. Lett. B 641, 278 (2006)

    work page 2006

  79. [79]

    F. K. Guo, P . N. Shen and H. C. Chiang, Dynamically generated 1+ heavy mesons, Phys. Lett. B 647, 133 (2007)

    work page 2007

  80. [80]

    Faessler, T

    A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, V . E. Lyubovitskij and Y . L. Ma, Molecular structure of the B∗ s0(5725) and Bs1(5778) bottom- strange mesons, Phys. Rev. D 77, 114013 (2008)

    work page 2008

Showing first 80 references.