Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

RelMap: Reliable Spatiotemporal Sensor Data Visualization via Imputative Spatial Interpolation

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Feeding graph-neural-network imputation values into spatial interpolation produces heatmaps that are both more accurate and more explicit about their own uncertainty.

desk verdict Unassessable: the supplied full text is an unrelated MeshLLM paper, so RelMap's claims cannot be checked. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.01240 v1 pith:G7HQNGJL submitted 2025-08-02 cs.LG cs.HC

classification cs.LGcs.HC
keywords spatiotemporalsensordataspatialinterpolationgraphneuralnetworksimputationuncertaintyvisualizationheatmapPrincipalNeighborhoodAggregationGeographicalPositionalEncoding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the usual practice of interpolating sparse sensor readings directly into a map is fragile, because sparse and irregular coverage leaves large areas dominated by guesswork. It proposes feeding the interpolator a dense set of reference values produced by a graph neural network, one that learns spatiotemporal dependencies using Principal Neighborhood Aggregation and Geographical Positional Encoding, so the map is built on informed estimates rather than raw distances alone. On top of that, it adds an uncertainty-encoding heatmap design meant to show viewers which parts of the map are reliable and which are not. If the approach holds, environmental and meteorological dashboards could show both a fuller picture and an honest account of where that picture is weak.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the impute-then-interpolate pipeline: a graph neural network with Principal Neighborhood Aggregation (a message-passing scheme that aggregates neighbor features with multiple aggregators) and Geographical Positional Encoding (a way of giving nodes a sense of location) produces dense reference values, which are then fed to a spatial interpolator to build the heatmap. The second mechanism is the extrinsic, static uncertainty encoding, an overlay that marks the map's credibility region-by-region. The two together carry the claim that reliability gains come from the imputation reference, not from the interpolator alone.

What would settle it

Take a real-world sensor dataset with complete ground truth, mask readings at a random subset of stations, run the pipeline, and compare the resulting map to the true field; if the imputation-reference map is no more accurate than plain spatial interpolation of the masked readings, or if the uncertainty heatmap does not assign higher uncertainty where the error is actually larger, the central claim is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a spatial interpolation pipeline can be made more reliable by first running a GNN-based imputation step whose output supplies dense reference data to the interpolator, and that the resulting heatmap can communicate the uncertainty of the interpolated field through an extrinsic, static visual encoding. The model learns spatiotemporal structure through Principal Neighborhood Aggregation and Geographical Positional Encoding, and the paper reports evaluations on real-world datasets and user studies showing better imputation accuracy, better interpolation quality when reference data is used, and clearer perception of uncertainty in the proposed heatmap design.

Load-bearing premise

The whole benefit rests on the GNN-imputed reference values being reliable enough that their errors do not outweigh the interpolator's own uncertainty, so a bad imputation model could make the map look fuller while actually making it less trustworthy.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Imputation reference data from a GNN improves the accuracy of spatial interpolation compared with interpolating raw sparse readings.
  • The PNA-GPE model captures spatiotemporal dependencies better than baseline imputation methods on real-world environmental and meteorological datasets.
  • A static, extrinsic uncertainty encoding lets viewers distinguish high-confidence from low-confidence regions of an interpolated heatmap.
  • The pipeline increases temporal resolution by filling gaps in sensor readings, enabling denser time series.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If imputation errors are spatially autocorrelated, the uncertainty heatmap may understate risk in exactly the regions where the GNN is confidently wrong; a natural extension is to calibrate the uncertainty display against held-out stations.
  • The same impute-then-interpolate idea could transfer to other sparse-measurement domains, such as air-quality or noise monitoring, wherever a graph of sensor locations is available.
  • A testable extension is to make the uncertainty encoding dynamic, letting users see how uncertainty grows as sensor coverage thins over time.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript, as identified by its abstract, claims to introduce RelMap, a spatial interpolation pipeline for spatiotemporal sensor data that uses imputation reference data from Graph Neural Networks with Principal Neighborhood Aggregation and Geographical Positional Encoding, along with an uncertainty-encoded heatmap visualization. The abstract further claims that extensive evaluations on real-world datasets and user studies demonstrate superior data imputation, improved interpolant quality, and effective uncertainty communication. The full text provided, however, is a different manuscript titled 'MeshLLM: Empowering Large Language Models to Progressively Understand and Generate 3D Mesh,' which contains no material related to RelMap. As a result, the actual method and evidence for RelMap are entirely absent from the submitted manuscript.

Significance. The topic addressed by the abstract—reliable spatiotemporal interpolation with explicit uncertainty visualization—is practically important for environmental monitoring and meteorological decision-making. If the claimed results were present and correct, the combination of GNN-based imputation reference data with a novel uncertainty-encoded heatmap could be a useful contribution to the sensor data visualization community. However, because the submitted full text is unrelated, no methodological details, derivations, equations, experimental results, or user-study design are available for assessment. I cannot verify the validity of the claims or compare them with existing work, so the significance remains unsubstantiated in this submission.

major comments (2)
  1. [Full text] The supplied full text is arXiv:2508.01242v2, 'MeshLLM: Empowering Large Language Models to Progressively Understand and Generate 3D Mesh,' which contains no mention of RelMap, spatial interpolation, GNN imputation, PNA, GPE, or uncertainty visualization; consequently, none of the abstract's claims about RelMap's pipeline, evaluations, or user studies can be checked against the manuscript body.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract asserts 'superior performance' for data imputation, 'improvements to the interpolant with reference data,' and 'effectiveness of our visualization design' without reporting any quantitative results or evaluation protocol; because the body text is absent, these assertions are unsupported, and the load-bearing premise that GNN-imputed reference data improve rather than corrupt the interpolated map remains untested.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'imputative spatial interpolation' is not a standard term; please define it in the main text or use conventional terminology such as 'interpolation with imputed reference data.'
  2. [Abstract] The abstract introduces PNA and GPE without definitions or citations; please provide brief explanations and references when the actual manuscript is submitted.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity can be assessed: the supplied full text is an unrelated MeshLLM manuscript, so the RelMap abstract's derivation chain is not present for audit.

full rationale

The abstract describes RelMap, a spatiotemporal interpolation pipeline with GNN-imputation reference data, PNA/GPE architecture, uncertainty-encoded heatmaps, and user studies. The provided full text, however, is the MeshLLM manuscript (arXiv:2508.01242), which contains no equations, methods, or experiments corresponding to RelMap. Without the actual methods section, there is no derivational chain to walk and no quoted reduction of a prediction to its fitted inputs or self-cited premise. The reader's concern about imputation-error propagation and the user-study confound are plausible risk factors, but they cannot be evaluated from the supplied text. Per the hard rules, circularity may only be flagged when the paper itself exhibits the specific reduction; no such exhibit is possible here. The honest finding is therefore no significant circularity identifiable from the available evidence, with the caveat that the evidence does not match the claimed paper.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The available record is the abstract only because the manuscript body is an unrelated paper. The abstract specifies no free parameters. The axioms listed are the implicit assumptions on which the abstract's claims depend, particularly the reliability of GNN imputation and the validity of the user study. No invented entities are introduced.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption GNN-imputed reference data is accurate enough to improve interpolation reliability rather than corrupting it.
    The abstract claims that imputation reference data from GNNs enhances visualization reliability. If imputed values carry large errors, the interpolation result is not more reliable.
  • domain assumption Spatial interpolation assumes spatial autocorrelation of the underlying sensor values.
    The abstract describes spatial interpolation as a core component. Without a spatial structure in the data, interpolated heatmaps would be meaningless.
  • domain assumption The user study measures uncertainty communication rather than subjective preference.
    The abstract claims effectiveness of the visualization design in communicating uncertainties. This depends on the design and task validity of the user study.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of RelMap: Reliable Spatiotemporal Sensor Data Visualization via Imputative Spatial Interpolation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/G7HQNGJL

@misc{pith2026250801240,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: RelMap: Reliable Spatiotemporal Sensor Data Visualization via Imputative Spatial Interpolation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/G7HQNGJL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.01240}
}
read the original abstract

Accurate and reliable visualization of spatiotemporal sensor data such as environmental parameters and meteorological conditions is crucial for informed decision-making. Traditional spatial interpolation methods, however, often fall short of producing reliable interpolation results due to the limited and irregular sensor coverage. This paper introduces a novel spatial interpolation pipeline that achieves reliable interpolation results and produces a novel heatmap representation with uncertainty information encoded. We leverage imputation reference data from Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to enhance visualization reliability and temporal resolution. By integrating Principal Neighborhood Aggregation (PNA) and Geographical Positional Encoding (GPE), our model effectively learns the spatiotemporal dependencies. Furthermore, we propose an extrinsic, static visualization technique for interpolation-based heatmaps that effectively communicates the uncertainties arising from various sources in the interpolated map. Through a set of use cases, extensive evaluations on real-world datasets, and user studies, we demonstrate our model's superior performance for data imputation, the improvements to the interpolant with reference data, and the effectiveness of our visualization design in communicating uncertainties.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. NarraGuide: an LLM-based Narrative Mobile Robot for Remote Place Exploration

    cs.HC 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    A location-aware LLM-narrating telepresence robot helped remote users explore a museum, according to a 20-person deployment study.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Gpt-4 technical report

    Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ah- mad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774 ,

  2. [2]

    Polydiff: Generating 3d polygonal meshes with diffusion models

    Antonio Alliegro, Yawar Siddiqui, Tatiana Tommasi, and Matthias Nießner. Polydiff: Generating 3d polygonal meshes with diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11417 ,

  3. [3]

    Palm 2 technical report

    Rohan Anil, Andrew M Dai, Orhan Firat, Melvin John- son, Dmitry Lepikhin, Alexandre Passos, Siamak Shakeri, Emanuel Taropa, Paige Bailey, Zhifeng Chen, et al. Palm 2 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10403, 2023. 1

  4. [4]

    Qwen technical report

    Jinze Bai, Shuai Bai, Yunfei Chu, Zeyu Cui, Kai Dang, Xiaodong Deng, Yang Fan, Wenbin Ge, Yu Han, Fei Huang, et al. Qwen technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16609, 2023. 1

  5. [5]

    Deepseek llm: Scaling open- source language models with longtermism

    Xiao Bi, Deli Chen, Guanting Chen, Shanhuang Chen, Damai Dai, Chengqi Deng, Honghui Ding, Kai Dong, Qiushi Du, Zhe Fu, et al. Deepseek llm: Scaling open- source language models with longtermism. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.02954, 2024. 2

  6. [6]

    Lan- guage models are few-shot learners

    Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Sub- biah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakan- tan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. Lan- guage models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural In- formation Processing Systems, 33:1877–1901, 2020. 1, 2

  7. [7]

    Shapenet: An information-rich 3d model repository

    Angel X Chang, Thomas Funkhouser, Leonidas Guibas, Pat Hanrahan, Qixing Huang, Zimo Li, Silvio Savarese, Manolis Savva, Shuran Song, Hao Su, et al. Shapenet: An information-rich 3d model repository. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.03012, 2015. 5

  8. [8]

    Meshxl: Neural coordinate field for generative 3d foundation models

    Sijin Chen, Xin Chen, Anqi Pang, Xianfang Zeng, Wei Cheng, Yijun Fu, Fukun Yin, Billzb Wang, Jingyi Yu, Gang Yu, et al. Meshxl: Neural coordinate field for generative 3d foundation models. Advances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems, 37:97141–97166, 2025. 3, 5, 6, 8, 1

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Meshanything: Artist-created mesh generation with au- toregressive transformers

    Yiwen Chen, Tong He, Di Huang, Weicai Ye, Sijin Chen, Ji- axiang Tang, Xin Chen, Zhongang Cai, Lei Yang, Gang Yu, et al. Meshanything: Artist-created mesh generation with au- toregressive transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.10163,

  2. [10]

    Meshany- thing v2: Artist-created mesh generation with adjacent mesh tokenization

    Yiwen Chen, Yikai Wang, Yihao Luo, Zhengyi Wang, Zilong Chen, Jun Zhu, Chi Zhang, and Guosheng Lin. Meshany- thing v2: Artist-created mesh generation with adjacent mesh tokenization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.02555, 2024. 3, 8

  3. [11]

    Grounded 3d-llm with referent tokens

    Yilun Chen, Shuai Yang, Haifeng Huang, Tai Wang, Run- sen Xu, Ruiyuan Lyu, Dahua Lin, and Jiangmiao Pang. Grounded 3d-llm with referent tokens. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.10370, 2024. 1

  4. [12]

    Sdfusion: Multimodal 3d shape completion, reconstruction, and generation

    Yen-Chi Cheng, Hsin-Ying Lee, Sergey Tulyakov, Alexan- der G Schwing, and Liang-Yan Gui. Sdfusion: Multimodal 3d shape completion, reconstruction, and generation. InPro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 4456–4465, 2023. 3

  5. [13]

    Palm: Scaling language modeling with pathways

    Aakanksha Chowdhery, Sharan Narang, Jacob Devlin, Maarten Bosma, Gaurav Mishra, Adam Roberts, Paul Barham, Hyung Won Chung, Charles Sutton, Sebastian Gehrmann, et al. Palm: Scaling language modeling with pathways. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 24(240): 1–113, 2023. 1

  6. [14]

    Scan2mesh: From un- structured range scans to 3d meshes

    Angela Dai and Matthias Nießner. Scan2mesh: From un- structured range scans to 3d meshes. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 5574–5583, 2019. 3

  7. [15]

    Objaverse-xl: A universe of 10m+ 3d objects

    Matt Deitke, Ruoshi Liu, Matthew Wallingford, Huong Ngo, Oscar Michel, Aditya Kusupati, Alan Fan, Christian Laforte, Vikram V oleti, Samir Yitzhak Gadre, et al. Objaverse-xl: A universe of 10m+ 3d objects. Advances in Neural Informa- tion Processing Systems, 36:35799–35813, 2023. 5, 1

  8. [16]

    Meteor universal: Lan- guage specific translation evaluation for any target language

    Michael Denkowski and Alon Lavie. Meteor universal: Lan- guage specific translation evaluation for any target language. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, pages 376–380, 2014. 6

  9. [17]

    Enhancing chat language models by scal- ing high-quality instructional conversations

    Ning Ding, Yulin Chen, Bokai Xu, Yujia Qin, Zhi Zheng, Shengding Hu, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun, and Bowen Zhou. Enhancing chat language models by scal- ing high-quality instructional conversations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14233, 2023. 6

  10. [18]

    Hyperdiffusion: Generating implicit neural fields with weight-space diffusion

    Ziya Erkoc ¸, Fangchang Ma, Qi Shan, Matthias Nießner, and Angela Dai. Hyperdiffusion: Generating implicit neural fields with weight-space diffusion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 14300–14310, 2023. 6, 1

  11. [19]

    Efficient implicit sdf and color recon- struction via shared feature field

    Shuangkang Fang, Dacheng Qi, Weixin Xu, Yufeng Wang, Zehao Zhang, Xiaorong Zhang, Huayu Zhang, Zeqi Shao, and Wenrui Ding. Efficient implicit sdf and color recon- struction via shared feature field. InProceedings of the Asian Conference on Computer Vision, pages 3499–3516, 2024. 3

  12. [20]

    Chat- edit-3d: Interactive 3d scene editing via text prompts

    Shuangkang Fang, Yufeng Wang, Yi-Hsuan Tsai, Yi Yang, Wenrui Ding, Shuchang Zhou, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. Chat- edit-3d: Interactive 3d scene editing via text prompts. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 199–216. Springer, 2024. 2

  13. [21]

    Scene-llm: Extending language model for 3d visual understanding and reasoning

    Rao Fu, Jingyu Liu, Xilun Chen, Yixin Nie, and Wen- han Xiong. Scene-llm: Extending language model for 3d visual understanding and reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.11401, 2024. 1

  14. [22]

    Worldgpt: Empowering llm as multimodal world model

    Zhiqi Ge, Hongzhe Huang, Mingze Zhou, Juncheng Li, Guoming Wang, Siliang Tang, and Yueting Zhuang. Worldgpt: Empowering llm as multimodal world model. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 7346–7355, 2024. 1

  15. [23]

    Imagebind: One embedding space to bind them all

    Rohit Girdhar, Alaaeldin El-Nouby, Zhuang Liu, Mannat Singh, Kalyan Vasudev Alwala, Armand Joulin, and Ishan Misra. Imagebind: One embedding space to bind them all. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 15180–15190, 2023. 2

  16. [24]

    The llama 3 herd of models

    Aaron Grattafiori, Abhimanyu Dubey, Abhinav Jauhri, Ab- hinav Pandey, Abhishek Kadian, Ahmad Al-Dahle, Aiesha Letman, Akhil Mathur, Alan Schelten, Alex Vaughan, et al. The llama 3 herd of models. arXiv e-prints, pages arXiv– 2407, 2024. 2, 5

  17. [25]

    Deepseek-r1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in llms via reinforcement learning

    Daya Guo, Dejian Yang, Haowei Zhang, Junxiao Song, Ruoyu Zhang, Runxin Xu, Qihao Zhu, Shirong Ma, Peiyi Wang, Xiao Bi, et al. Deepseek-r1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in llms via reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12948, 2025. 2

  18. [26]

    Point-bind & point-llm: Aligning point cloud with multi-modality for 3d understand- ing, generation, and instruction following

    Ziyu Guo, Renrui Zhang, Xiangyang Zhu, Yiwen Tang, Xi- anzheng Ma, Jiaming Han, Kexin Chen, Peng Gao, Xi- anzhi Li, Hongsheng Li, et al. Point-bind & point-llm: Aligning point cloud with multi-modality for 3d understand- ing, generation, and instruction following. arXiv prepri...

  19. [27]

    3dgen: Triplane latent diffusion for textured mesh generation

    Anchit Gupta, Wenhan Xiong, Yixin Nie, Ian Jones, and Bar- las O˘guz. 3dgen: Triplane latent diffusion for textured mesh generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.05371, 2023. 3

  20. [28]

    Audioclip: Extending clip to image, text and au- dio

    Andrey Guzhov, Federico Raue, J ¨orn Hees, and Andreas Dengel. Audioclip: Extending clip to image, text and au- dio. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pages 976–980. IEEE, 2022. 2

  21. [29]

    Y2seq2seq: Cross-modal repre- sentation learning for 3d shape and text by joint reconstruc- tion and prediction of view and word sequences

    Zhizhong Han, Mingyang Shang, Xiyang Wang, Yu-Shen Liu, and Matthias Zwicker. Y2seq2seq: Cross-modal repre- sentation learning for 3d shape and text by joint reconstruc- tion and prediction of view and word sequences. InProceed- ings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intell...

  22. [30]

    Shapecaptioner: Generative caption network for 3d shapes by learning a mapping from parts detected in multiple views to sentences

    Zhizhong Han, Chao Chen, Yu-Shen Liu, and Matthias Zwicker. Shapecaptioner: Generative caption network for 3d shapes by learning a mapping from parts detected in multiple views to sentences. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 1018–1027, 2020. 3

  23. [31]

    Meshtron: High-fidelity, artist-like 3d mesh generation at scale

    Zekun Hao, David W Romero, Tsung-Yi Lin, and Ming-Yu Liu. Meshtron: High-fidelity, artist-like 3d mesh generation at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.09548, 2024. 3

  24. [32]

    Training compute-optimal large language mod- els

    Jordan Hoffmann, Sebastian Borgeaud, Arthur Mensch, Elena Buchatskaya, Trevor Cai, Eliza Rutherford, Diego de Las Casas, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Johannes Welbl, Aidan Clark, et al. Training compute-optimal large language mod- els. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.15556, 2022. 1

  25. [33]

    3d-llm: In- jecting the 3d world into large language models

    Yining Hong, Haoyu Zhen, Peihao Chen, Shuhong Zheng, Yilun Du, Zhenfang Chen, and Chuang Gan. 3d-llm: In- jecting the 3d world into large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:20482–20494,

  26. [34]

    2d gaussian splatting for geometrically ac- curate radiance fields

    Binbin Huang, Zehao Yu, Anpei Chen, Andreas Geiger, and Shenghua Gao. 2d gaussian splatting for geometrically ac- curate radiance fields. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2024 Conference Papers, pages 1–11, 2024. 3

  27. [35]

    Shap-e: Generat- ing conditional 3d implicit functions

    Heewoo Jun and Alex Nichol. Shap-e: Generat- ing conditional 3d implicit functions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.02463, 2023. 3

  28. [36]

    Scaling laws for neural language models

    Jared Kaplan, Sam McCandlish, Tom Henighan, Tom B Brown, Benjamin Chess, Rewon Child, Scott Gray, Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, and Dario Amodei. Scaling laws for neural language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08361,

  29. [37]

    3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering

    Bernhard Kerbl, Georgios Kopanas, Thomas Leimk ¨uhler, and George Drettakis. 3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering. ACM Trans. Graph., 42(4):139–1,

  30. [38]

    Audio-llm: Activating the capabilities of large language models to com- prehend audio data

    Dongting Li, Chenchong Tang, and Han Liu. Audio-llm: Activating the capabilities of large language models to com- prehend audio data. In International Symposium on Neural Networks, pages 133–142. Springer, 2024. 2

  31. [39]

    Acoustic prompt tun- ing: Empowering large language models with audition capa- bilities

    Jinhua Liang, Xubo Liu, Wenwu Wang, Mark D Plumbley, Huy Phan, and Emmanouil Benetos. Acoustic prompt tun- ing: Empowering large language models with audition capa- bilities. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, 2025. 2

  32. [40]

    Rouge: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries

    Chin-Yew Lin. Rouge: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In Text Summarization Branches out, pages 74–81, 2004. 6

  33. [41]

    Deepseek-v2: A strong, economical, and efficient mixture-of-experts language model

    Aixin Liu, Bei Feng, Bin Wang, Bingxuan Wang, Bo Liu, Chenggang Zhao, Chengqi Dengr, Chong Ruan, Damai Dai, Daya Guo, et al. Deepseek-v2: A strong, economical, and efficient mixture-of-experts language model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.04434, 2024. 2

  34. [42]

    Deepseek-v3 technical report

    Aixin Liu, Bei Feng, Bing Xue, Bingxuan Wang, Bochao Wu, Chengda Lu, Chenggang Zhao, Chengqi Deng, Chenyu Zhang, Chong Ruan, et al. Deepseek-v3 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.19437, 2024. 2

  35. [43]

    Visual instruction tuning

    Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, and Yong Jae Lee. Visual instruction tuning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:34892–34916, 2023. 1, 2

  36. [44]

    Improved baselines with visual instruction tuning

    Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Yuheng Li, and Yong Jae Lee. Improved baselines with visual instruction tuning. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 26296–26306, 2024. 2

  37. [45]

    Music understanding llama: Advancing text-to- music generation with question answering and captioning

    Shansong Liu, Atin Sakkeer Hussain, Chenshuo Sun, and Ying Shan. Music understanding llama: Advancing text-to- music generation with question answering and captioning. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pages 286–290. IEEE, 2024. 1

  38. [46]

    Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view syn- thesis

    Ben Mildenhall, Pratul P Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T Barron, Ravi Ramamoorthi, and Ren Ng. Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view syn- thesis. Communications of the ACM , 65(1):99–106, 2021. 3

  39. [47]

    Diffrf: Rendering-guided 3d radiance field diffusion

    Norman M ¨uller, Yawar Siddiqui, Lorenzo Porzi, Samuel Rota Bulo, Peter Kontschieder, and Matthias Nießner. Diffrf: Rendering-guided 3d radiance field diffusion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 4328–4338, 2023. 3 eri...

  40. [73]

    Video-llama: An instruction-tuned audio-visual language model for video un- derstanding

    Hang Zhang, Xin Li, and Lidong Bing. Video-llama: An instruction-tuned audio-visual language model for video un- derstanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.02858, 2023. 1, 2

  41. [74]

    Vgbench: Evaluating large language models on vector graphics understanding and generation

    Bocheng Zou, Mu Cai, Jianrui Zhang, and Yong Jae Lee. Vgbench: Evaluating large language models on vector graphics understanding and generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.10972, 2024. 2 Figure 10. Examples of the constructed Primitive-Mesh . (a) The KNN-based method is simple ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.