Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 2 cited by

Eliminating beam-induced depolarizing effects in the hydrogen jet target for high-precision proton beam polarimetry at the Electron-Ion Collider

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Raising the hydrogen jet target's magnetic guide field to about 400 mT moves all hyperfine transition frequencies past the beam-harmonic cutoff, keeping EIC absolute proton polarimetry at the required 1% precision.

desk verdict New, specific, and plausibly important claim about EIC target depolarization—but the abstract alone doesn't secure the factor-of-three cutoff. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.01366 v1 pith:FNUSO4IP submitted 2025-08-02 physics.acc-ph nucl-ex

F. Rathmann , A. Nass , K.O. Eyser , V. Shmakova , E.C. Aschenauer , G. Atoian , A. Cannavo , K. Hock
show 11 more authors
H. Huang H. Lovelace G. Mahler J. Ritter G. Robert-Demolaize V. Schoefer P. Shanmuganathan E. Shulga H. Soltner X. Chu Z. Zhang
This is my paper
classification physics.acc-phnucl-ex
keywords beam-induceddepolarizationhydrogenjettargetabsolutepolarimetryElectron-IonColliderhyperfinetransitionsbunchharmonicsmagneticguidefieldfrequency-domainanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to show that the hydrogen jet target used for absolute proton beam polarimetry at RHIC cannot run unchanged at the Electron-Ion Collider: the EIC's bunch structure produces electromagnetic harmonics that can resonantly drive hyperfine transitions in the target hydrogen atoms and depolarize them. The authors analyze the beam's harmonic content in the frequency domain and establish a photon-emission threshold above which beam-induced fields are too weak to cause significant depolarization. At the current guide field of 120 mT, the threshold is exceeded for both EIC injection at 23.5 GeV and flattop at 275 GeV, so the required 1% polarimetry precision would be lost. Raising the guide field to about 400 mT moves every hyperfine transition frequency to at least three times the cutoff frequency, restoring a safety margin. If this is right, the EIC's polarimetry target gets a concrete magnet specification rather than a redesign.

What carries the argument

The central object is the set of hyperfine transition frequencies of atomic hydrogen in a magnetic guide field, compared with the harmonic content of the EIC beam's electromagnetic field at the target. The bunch repetition frequency and bunch duration generate a harmonic series; a harmonic that coincides with a hyperfine transition can resonantly drive it and depolarize the target atoms. The analysis introduces a photon-emission threshold (a cutoff frequency) above which the beam-induced fields are too weak to cause significant depolarization, and it adopts as a design criterion that all transition frequencies be at least three times this cutoff. The magnetic guide field $B_0$ is the tuning knob: raising it shifts the hyperfine transition frequencies upward through the Zeeman effect, pushing them past the cutoff and restoring a safe margin.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of the hydrogen jet target's polarization under EIC-like bunch structure at both 120 mT and 400 mT would settle the claim: if depolarization remains significant at 400 mT, or turns out to be absent at 120 mT, the threshold model is wrong. A time-domain simulation that includes coherent multi-bunch phases and the full electromagnetic field components could also test whether any hyperfine transition rate exceeds the cutoff at 400 mT.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that for EIC injection at 23.5 GeV and flattop at 275 GeV, beam-induced depolarization through the bunch structure renders operation at the current RHIC magnetic guide field at the target, $B_0 = 120\,\mathrm{mT}$, untenable. It further claims that increasing the guide field to $B_0 \approx 400\,\mathrm{mT}$ moves all hyperfine transition frequencies to at least three times the cutoff frequency, ensuring reliable absolute beam polarimetry with the required 1% precision. The argument rests on a frequency-domain analysis in which beam harmonics are compared with the hydrogen hyperfine transition frequencies, together with a photon-emission threshold that separates harmonics strong enough to depolarize the target from those that are too weak to matter.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the beam's effect on the target atoms is fully captured by the harmonic content of its fields at the target, and that a photon-emission threshold based on the hyperfine transition rate cleanly separates dangerous from harmless harmonics; if coherent multi-bunch effects or higher-order field components contribute, the 400 mT recommendation may not actually provide the claimed safety margin.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The EIC hydrogen jet target must be operated with a guide field near 400 mT instead of the 120 mT used at RHIC.
  • At 400 mT, all hydrogen hyperfine transition frequencies lie at least three times above the cutoff frequency, providing the margin needed for 1% absolute polarimetry.
  • Absolute proton beam polarimetry at EIC injection and flattop energies can meet its precision target without changing the bunch structure.
  • The frequency-domain threshold criterion gives a reusable method for evaluating beam-induced depolarization in other jet targets or accelerators.
  • The required change is a local upgrade of the target's magnet, not a redesign of the jet or the polarimeter.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same cutoff criterion could be applied to other polarized atomic targets, such as deuterium or helium-3, at machines where bunch harmonics might resonantly drive hyperfine or Zeeman transitions.
  • The factor-of-three margin is a design choice rather than a derived bound; if later studies find coherent multi-bunch effects, the required field could be higher or lower, so an on-line check of target polarization during early EIC commissioning would be prudent.
  • Because the jet atoms move rapidly through the beam, time-of-flight smearing could alter how sharply the beam harmonics resonate with the hyperfine transitions, an effect not obviously visible in a stationary frequency-domain picture.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript (arXiv:2508.01366) as provided consists of an abstract only. It claims that at the EIC, the bunch structure of the beams (higher repetition frequencies, shorter bunch durations) will cause beam-induced depolarization of the hydrogen jet target through resonant driving of hyperfine transitions at the current RHIC guide field of B0 = 120 mT. The abstract recommends increasing the guide field to B0 ≈ 400 mT so that all hyperfine transition frequencies are at least three times a 'cutoff frequency' above which beam harmonics are too weak to cause significant depolarization, thereby enabling 1% absolute polarimetry. No derivation, beam parameters, model description, or error estimates are presented.

Significance. The proposed change to the HJET guide field is of clear practical importance for the EIC polarimetry program: if the 400 mT recommendation is correct, it is a simple and implementable modification that would preserve absolute polarimetry accuracy. However, because the manuscript contains no supporting technical analysis, the actual significance and correctness cannot be evaluated. The claim that the current 120 mT operation is 'untenable' at the EIC is a strong, falsifiable prediction that, if properly derived, would be a useful design constraint. No credit can be given for derivations, code, or data, as none are included.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract (full manuscript text is absent)] The manuscript contains only the abstract; the full text is missing. There is no derivation of the frequency-domain model, no definition of the 'photon emission threshold' or 'cutoff frequency', no beam parameters (bunch length, repetition rate, intensity, beam-target geometry), and no error analysis. The central claims cannot be reproduced or checked from the submitted material.
  2. [Abstract] The factor-of-three criterion is stated without derivation or justification. The abstract converts a continuous spectral roll-off into a binary safety condition ('at least three times the cutoff frequency'), but provides no relation between this frequency ratio and the depolarization rate. If the cutoff is defined as the frequency at which the spectral amplitude reaches a given threshold, harmonics above that cutoff still contribute a finite transition rate. Given an EIC fill with on the order of 10^5 bunches per second over hours, even a rate nominally suppressed by a factor of three could accumulate to exceed the 1% polarimetry tolerance. A quantitative tolerance budget, including the total number of bunches per measurement, is required to support the 400 mT recommendation.
  3. [Abstract] The physical model is underspecified. The abstract mentions 'hyperfine transitions in hydrogen' and a 'photon emission threshold', but does not specify which hyperfine states are involved, how the guide field shifts the transition frequencies (e.g., via the Breit-Rabi formula), or how the beam-induced magnetic fields couple to the target atoms. It also does not address coherent multi-bunch effects or non-Gaussian longitudinal bunch profiles, either of which could produce narrow spectral components near the transition frequencies that a smooth harmonic envelope would underestimate. Without these details, the claim that 400 mT moves all transitions to a safe region is not established.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'at least three times the cutoff frequency' is ambiguous because the abstract does not specify what property of the cutoff is being multiplied; define the cutoff precisely and state the metric used for the factor of three.
  2. [Abstract] The manuscript would benefit from references to the HJET design and to prior RHIC polarimetry measurements, so that readers can assess the operational context and the significance of the proposed change.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity is evident in the provided abstract; the beam-harmonic versus hyperfine-transition comparison is not constructed from the paper's conclusion.

full rationale

The available text (the abstract only) presents an analysis that compares beam harmonic frequencies, determined by EIC bunch structure and magnetic guide field, with hydrogen hyperfine transition frequencies. The recommendation B0 ≈ 400 mT is tied to a stated criterion — all hyperfine transition frequencies at least three times a photon-emission cutoff — rather than to a target depolarization value. The factor-of-three cutoff is not derived in the abstract and may be an under-specified design rule, but under-derivation is a completeness or correctness concern, not circularity: no equation in the supplied text defines the cutoff in terms of the 1% precision requirement or fits the guide field to the quoted conclusion. No self-citation is invoked in the abstract. Therefore, no specific reduction from conclusion to input can be exhibited, and the appropriate finding is no significant circularity (score 0). If the full text were available, the derivation of the cutoff frequency would be the place to check for a hidden self-consistency condition, but with the supplied material there is no basis for a circularity finding.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on the standard hyperfine structure of hydrogen, a frequency-domain representation of the beam, and a safety criterion that the abstract does not derive. No new entities are introduced. The 3x margin is a design parameter.

free parameters (1)
  • safety margin factor = 3
    The abstract states that transition frequencies must be at least three times the cutoff frequency. This factor is a stated design criterion, not derived from the abstract's visible content.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The beam's electromagnetic field at the target can be represented by its harmonic content determined by bunch repetition frequency and bunch duration.
    Central to the frequency-domain analysis; if multi-bunch or coherent effects dominate, the harmonic model may fail.
  • standard math Hyperfine transition frequencies of hydrogen in a magnetic field follow the known Breit-Rabi relation.
    The analysis compares beam harmonics to these transition frequencies, so the standard atomic physics is assumed.
  • ad hoc to paper A transition frequency at least three times the cutoff frequency avoids significant depolarization.
    The abstract introduces this safety factor without derivation, and the recommendation depends on it.
  • domain assumption Increasing the guide field to 400 mT does not introduce other depolarizing mechanisms or operational problems.
    The recommendation assumes the higher field is compatible with the target and accelerator environment.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Eliminating beam-induced depolarizing effects in the hydrogen jet target for high-precision proton beam polarimetry at the Electron-Ion Collider." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FNUSO4IP

@misc{pith2026250801366,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Eliminating beam-induced depolarizing effects in the hydrogen jet target for high-precision proton beam polarimetry at the Electron-Ion Collider},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FNUSO4IP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.01366}
}
abstract

We analyze beam-induced depolarizing effects in the hydrogen jet target (HJET) at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) that has been used for absolute hadron beam polarimetry and shall be employed at the Electron-Ion Collider (EIC). The EIC's higher bunch repetition frequencies and shorter bunch durations shift beam harmonics to frequencies that can resonantly drive hyperfine transitions in hydrogen, threatening to depolarize the target atoms. Using frequency-domain analysis of beam harmonics and hyperfine transition frequencies, we establish a photon emission threshold above which beam-induced fields are too weak to cause significant depolarization. For EIC injection (\SI{23.5}{\GeV}) and flattop (\SI{275}{\GeV}), beam-induced depolarization through the bunch structure renders operation at the current RHIC magnetic guide field at the target of $B_0 = \SI{120}{\milli\tesla}$ untenable. Increasing the magnetic guide field at the target to $B_0 \approx \SI{400}{\milli\tesla}$ moves all hyperfine transition frequencies to at least three times the cutoff frequency, ensuring reliable absolute beam polarimetry with the required 1\% precision at the EIC.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Evaluation of the beam-induced depolarization of the HJET target at the EIC

    physics.ins-det 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Beam-induced depolarization of the HJET target at the EIC is ≤0.011% for nominal parameters — an order of magnitude below the jet-polarization accuracy requirement — because only strongly-suppressed high harmonics of ...

  2. Comments on the paper "Eliminating beam-induced depolarizing effects in the hydrogen jet target for high-precision proton beam polarimetry at the Electron-Ion Collider"

    physics.acc-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    Critique shows that assumptions including photon emission threshold and Fermi's Golden Rule application in Rathmann et al. create spurious depolarization effects; consistent QM treatment finds them negligible at the EIC.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Willeke \ and\ author J

    author author F. Willeke \ and\ author J. Beebe-Wang ,\ https://doi.org/10.2172/1765663 title Electron Ion Collider Conceptual Design Report 2021 ,\ type Tech. Rep. \ ( institution Brookhaven National Lab. (BNL), Upton, NY (United States); Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (TJNAF), Newport News, VA (United States) ,\ year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi:10.2172/1765663 2021

  2. [2]

    Accardi , author J

    author author A. Accardi , author J. L. \ Albacete , author M. Anselmino , author N. Armesto , author E. C. \ Aschenauer , author A. Bacchetta , author D. Boer , author W. K. \ Brooks , author T. Burton , author N.-B. \ Chang , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2016-16268-9 journal journal European Physical Journal A \ volume 52 ,\ pages 268 ( year ...

    arXiv

  3. [3]

    Abdul Khalek , author A

    author author R. Abdul Khalek , author A. Accardi , author J. Adam , author D. Adamiak , author W. Akers , author M. Albaladejo , author A. Al-bataineh , author M. Alexeev , author F. Ameli , author P. Antonioli , author N. Armesto , author W. Armstrong , author M. Arratia , author J. Arrington , author A. Asaturyan , author M. Asai , author E. Aschenauer...

    work page arXiv

  4. [4]

    Zelenski , author G

    author author A. Zelenski , author G. Atoian , author D. Raparia , author J. Ritter , author A. Kolmogorov ,\ and\ author V. Davydenko ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5053343 journal journal AIP Conf. Proc. \ volume 2011 ,\ pages 070001 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5053343 2011

  5. [5]

    Zelenski , author G

    author author A. Zelenski , author G. Atoian , author E. Beebe , author S. Ikeda , author T. Kanesue , author S. Kondrashev , author J. Maxwell , author R. Milner , author M. Musgrave , author M. Okamura , author A. Poblaguev , author D. Raparia , author J. Ritter , author A. Sukhanov ,\ and\ author S. Trabocchi ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/...

    work page arXiv

  6. [6]

    Wang , author O

    author author E. Wang , author O. Rahman , author J. Skaritka , author W. Liu , author J. Biswas , author C. Degen , author P. Inacker , author R. Lambiase ,\ and\ author M. Paniccia ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.25.033401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams \ volume 25 ,\ pages 033401 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.25.033401

  7. [7]

    Wang , author O

    author author E. Wang , author O. Rahman , author J. Biswas , author J. Skaritka , author P. Inacker , author W. Liu , author R. Napoli ,\ and\ author M. Paniccia ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0216694 journal journal Appl. Phys. Lett. \ volume 124 ,\ pages 254101 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0216694

  8. [8]

    Fischer \ and\ author A

    author author W. Fischer \ and\ author A. Bazilevsky ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.15.041001 journal journal Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams \ volume 15 ,\ pages 041001 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevstab.15.041001 2012

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    author author V. H. \ Ranjbar ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.22.091001 journal journal Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams \ volume 22 ,\ pages 091001 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  2. [10]

    Huang \ and\ author K

    author author H. Huang \ and\ author K. Kurita ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2401392 journal journal AIP Conf. Proc. \ volume 868 ,\ pages 3 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006 doi

  3. [11]

    Alekseev , author C

    author author I. Alekseev , author C. Allgower , author M. Bai , author Y. Batygin , author L. Bozano , author K. Brown , author G. Bunce , author P. Cameron , author E. Courant , author S. Erin , author J. Escallier , author W. Fischer , author R. Gupta , author K. Hatanaka ,...

  4. [12]

    author author RHIC Polarimetry Group ,\ https://technotes.bnl.gov/PDF?publicationId=209057 title RHIC polarization for Runs 9-17 ,\ type Technical Note \ number BNL-209057-2018-TECH C-A/AP/609 \ ( institution Brookhaven National Laboratory ,\ year 2018 )\ note Collider Acceler...

    2018

  5. [13]

    ottcher , author A. Borissov , author J. Brack , author S. Brauksiepe , author B. Braun , author B. Bray , author S. Brons , author W. Br\

    author author K. Ackerstaff , author A. Airapetian , author N. Akopov , author M. Amarian , author E. C. \ Aschenauer , author H. Avakian , author R. Avakian , author A. Avetissian , author B. Bains , author C. Baumgarten , author M. Beckmann , author S. Belostotski , author J...

  6. [14]

    Haeberli ,\ https://cerncourier.com/a/h-jet-measures-beam-polarization-at-rhic/ journal journal CERN Cour

    author author W. Haeberli ,\ https://cerncourier.com/a/h-jet-measures-beam-polarization-at-rhic/ journal journal CERN Cour. \ volume 45N8 ,\ pages 15 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005

  7. [15]

    author author A. A. \ Poblaguev et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.162001 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 123 ,\ pages 162001 ( year 2019 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.11135 arXiv:1909.11135 [hep-ex] NoStop

    2019 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Harrison , author S

    author author M. Harrison , author S. Peggs ,\ and\ author T. Roser ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nucl.52.050102.090650 journal journal Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science \ volume 52 ,\ pages 425 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

  9. [17]

    Akchurin , author J

    author author N. Akchurin , author J. Langland , author Y. Onel , author B. E. \ Bonner , author M. D. \ Corcoran , author J. Cranshaw , author F. Nessi-Tedaldi , author M. Nessi , author C. Nguyen , author J. B. \ Roberts , author J. Skeens , author J. L. \ White , author A. ...

  10. [18]

    author author I. G. \ Alekseev , author A. Bravar , author G. Bunce , author S. Dhawan , author K. O. \ Eyser , author R. Gill , author W. Haeberli , author H. Huang , author O. Jinnouchi , author A. Kponou , author Y. Makdisi , author I. Nakagawa , author A. Nass , author H. ...

    doi

  11. [19]

    author author N. H. \ Buttimore ,\ in\ https://pos.sissa.it/173/057/ booktitle Proceedings of the 2013 International Workshop on Polarized Sources, Targets and Polarimetry (PSTP2013) \ ( publisher PoS ,\ year 2013 )\ p.\ pages 057 NoStop

    2013

  12. [20]

    author author B. Z. \ Kopeliovich \ and\ author L. I. \ Lapidus ,\ @noop journal journal Yad. Fiz. \ volume 19 ,\ pages 218 ( year 1974 ) NoStop

    1974

  13. [21]

    author author N. H. \ Buttimore , author E. Gotsman ,\ and\ author E. Leader ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.18.694 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 18 ,\ pages 694 ( year 1978 ) NoStop

    1978 doi

  14. [22]

    author author N. H. \ Buttimore , author B. Z. \ Kopeliovich , author E. Leader , author J. Soffer ,\ and\ author T. L. \ Trueman ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.59.114010 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 59 ,\ pages 114010 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    doi

  15. [23]

    = 2G \, _N reflects the deviation from the Dirac value 2 \, _N

    note This can be rewritten as _p = 2(1 + G) \, _N = 2 \, _N + 2G \, _N , showing explicitly that the anomalous contribution _p^ anom. = 2G \, _N reflects the deviation from the Dirac value 2 \, _N . Stop

  16. [24]

    author author P. J. \ Mohr , author D. B. \ Newell ,\ and\ author B. N. \ Taylor ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.91.035009 journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 91 ,\ pages 035009 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  17. [25]

    Zelenski , author A

    author author A. Zelenski , author A. Bravar , author D. Graham , author W. Haeberli , author S. Kokhanovski , author Y. Makdisi , author G. Mahler , author A. Nass , author J. Ritter , author T. Wise ,\ and\ author V. Zubets ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2...

    doi

  18. [26]

    Bunce , author N

    author author G. Bunce , author N. Saito , author J. Soffer ,\ and\ author W. Vogelsang ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nucl.50.1.525 journal journal Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science \ volume 50 ,\ pages 525 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    doi

  19. [27]

    Poblaguev , author A

    author author A. Poblaguev , author A. Zelenski , author G. Atoian , author Y. Makdisi ,\ and\ author J. Ritter ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2020.164261 journal journal Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectromet...

    2020

  20. [28]

    Mikirtychyants , author R

    author author M. Mikirtychyants , author R. Engels , author K. Grigoryev , author H. Kleines , author P. Kravtsov , author S. Lorenz , author M. Nekipelov , author V. Nelyubin , author F. Rathmann , author J. Sarkadi , author H. Paetz gen. Schieck , author H. Seyfarth , author...

    doi

  21. [29]

    Nass , author C

    author author A. Nass , author C. Baumgarten , author B. Braun , author G. Ciullo , author G. Court , author P. Dalpiaz , author A. Golendukhin , author G. Graw , author W. Haeberli , author M. Henoch , author R. Hertenberger , author N. Koch , author H. Kolster , author P. Le...

  22. [30]

    U berschallexpansionen : Eine Studie zur Formation von kalten Wasserstoff- und Deuteriumatomstrahlen f \

    author author A. Na ,\ title Niederdruck- \"U berschallexpansionen : Eine Studie zur Formation von kalten Wasserstoff- und Deuteriumatomstrahlen f \"u r polarisierte Gastargets ,\ https://doi.org/10.3204/DESY-THESIS-2002-012 Ph.D. thesis ,\ school U. Erlangen-Nuremberg (main) ...

    2002 doi

  23. [31]

    The Madison convention is more natural for fixed target experiments with inherently Cartesian coordinate systems

    note Here the Madison convention is used \, Ohlsen1972, MadisonConvention1971 , which employs Cartesian observables ( A_y , A_ yy , A_ xx , etc.) relative to the beam and scattering plane, rather than the spherical tensor notation ( A_N , A_ NN , etc.) of the Ann Arbor convent...

  24. [32]

    author author R. C. \ Hanna ,\ in\ @noop booktitle Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Polarization Phenomena of Nucleons ,\ editor edited by\ editor P. Huber \ and\ editor H. Schopper \ ( publisher Birkhäuser Verlag ,\ address Basel, Switzerland ,\ year 1966 )\ ...

    1966

  25. [33]

    Rathmann , author B

    author author F. Rathmann , author B. von Przewoski , author W. A. \ Dezarn , author J. Doskow , author M. Dzemidzic , author W. Haeberli , author J. G. \ Hardie , author B. Lorentz , author H. O. \ Meyer , author P. V. \ Pancella , author R. E. \ Pollock , author T. Rinckel ,...

    doi

  26. [34]

    author author B. v. \ Przewoski , author F. Rathmann , author W. A. \ Dezarn , author J. Doskow , author M. Dzemidzic , author W. Haeberli , author J. G. \ Hardie , author B. Lorentz , author H. O. \ Meyer , author P. V. \ Pancella , author R. E. \ Pollock , author T. Rinckel ...

    doi

  27. [35]

    author author N. F. \ Ramsey ,\ @noop title Molecular Beams \ ( publisher Oxford University Press ,\ year 1956 ) NoStop

    1956

  28. [36]

    Haeberli ,\ https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ns.17.120167.002105 journal journal Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science \ volume 17 ,\ pages 373 ( year 1967 ) NoStop

    author author W. Haeberli ,\ https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ns.17.120167.002105 journal journal Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science \ volume 17 ,\ pages 373 ( year 1967 ) NoStop

    1967

  29. [37]

    Cohen-Tannoudji , author B

    author author C. Cohen-Tannoudji , author B. Diu ,\ and\ author F. Laloë ,\ @noop title Quantenmechanik ,\ edition 2nd \ ed.\ ( publisher de Gruyter ,\ address Berlin ,\ year 1999 ) NoStop

    1999

  30. [38]

    Breit \ and\ author I

    author author G. Breit \ and\ author I. I. \ Rabi ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.38.2082.2 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 38 ,\ pages 2082 ( year 1931 ) NoStop

    1931 doi

  31. [39]

    Diermaier , author C

    author author M. Diermaier , author C. B. \ Jepsen , author B. Kolbinger , author C. Malbrunot , author O. Massiczek , author C. Sauerzopf , author M. C. \ Simon , author J. Zmeskal ,\ and\ author E. Widmann ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15749 journal journal Nature Commun....

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    note A similar classification scheme was used in the analysis of beam-induced depolarization at the HERMES experiment at DESY, where RF fields generated by the HERA electron beam lead to transitions between hyperfine states of hydrogen and deuterium atoms in the polarized stor...

  33. [41]

    \, eq:Breit-Rabi-formula

    note The effective magnetic moment can be defined as _ eff = - dE dB , where E is the energy of a state from the Breit-Rabi formula in Eq. \, eq:Breit-Rabi-formula . Stop

  34. [42]

    note FFT stands for Fast Fourier Transform , a computational algorithm used to efficiently evaluate the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) of a signal, converting it from the time domain into its frequency components. Stop

  35. [43]

    Wise , author M

    author author T. Wise , author M. Chapman , author W. Haeberli , author H. Kolster ,\ and\ author P. Quin ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2005.09.042 journal journal Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, D...

    2005 doi

  36. [44]

    author author S. Y. \ Lee ,\ @noop title Accelerator Physics ,\ edition 3rd \ ed.\ ( publisher World Scientific ,\ year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011

  37. [45]

    Zelenski , author G

    author author A. Zelenski , author G. Atoian , author A. Bogdanov , author D. Raparia , author M. Runtso ,\ and\ author E. Stephenson ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/295/1/012132 journal journal Journal of Physics: Conference Series \ volume 295 ,\ pages 012132 ( year 201...

    doi

  38. [46]

    Accardi et al

    author author A. Accardi et al. ( collaboration LHCspin ),\ @noop \ ( year 2025 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.16034 arXiv:2504.16034 [hep-ex] NoStop

    2025 arXiv

  39. [47]

    author author G. G. \ Ohlsen ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/35/2/305 journal journal Reports on Progress in Physics \ volume 35 ,\ pages 717 ( year 1972 ) NoStop

    1972 doi

  40. [48]

    in\ @noop booktitle Polarization Phenomena in Nuclear Reactions: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Polarization Phenomena in Nuclear Reactions ,\ editor edited by\ editor H. H. \ Barschall \ and\ editor W. Haeberli \ ( publisher University of Wisconsin Press ...

    1971

  41. [49]

    Ashkin , author E

    author author J. Ashkin , author E. Leader , author M. L. \ Marshak , author J. B. \ Roberts , author J. Soffer ,\ and\ author G. H. \ Thomas ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.31281 journal journal AIP Conf. Proc. \ volume 42 ,\ pages 142 ( year 1978 ) NoStop

    doi

  42. [50]

    Airapetian , author N

    author author A. Airapetian , author N. Akopov , author Z. Akopov , author M. Amarian , author A. Andrus , author E. Aschenauer , author W. Augustyniak , author R. Avakian , author A. Avetissian , author E. Avetissian , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2004.11.020 jour...

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.